Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 43 references

Superconducting vacancy-ordered rock-salt NbO films

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Single-phase, vacancy-ordered rock-salt NbO thin films grown by MBE superconduct up to 1.37 K, close to bulk single crystals.

desk verdict Useful substrate-selection study for epitaxial NbO, but the highest-Tc sample is likely off-stoichiometric NbO0.96 rather than the headline 'comparable to bulk' claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14997 v1 pith:IYDAKYMR submitted 2025-05-21 cond-mat.supr-con

classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.70.Ad81.15.Hi
keywords NbOniobiummonoxidevacancy-orderedrock-saltmolecularbeamepitaxysuperconductivityAl2O3(0001)epitaxialthinfilmsoxygenpartialpressure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that single-phase, vacancy-ordered rock-salt NbO thin films can be grown by molecular beam epitaxy and that these films superconduct up to Tc = 1.37 K, close to the bulk single-crystal value of 1.61 K. The central claim is that substrate choice, not lattice matching, decides success: despite the largest lattice mismatch (−7.7%), Al2O3(0001) is the optimal platform because it avoids the Mg–Nb–O alloying that ruins films on MgO and MgAl2O4. This matters because NbO is a rare stoichiometric binary oxide superconductor with an uncommon Nb2+ oxidation state and ordered cation and anion vacancies, and previously its thin-film form was hard to stabilize without defect phases. If correct, the work opens a route to studying superconductivity in a material whose vacancy order and oxidation state are intrinsically linked.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vacancy-ordered rock-salt structure of NbO (space group Pm3m), in which a quarter of both the Nb and O sites are empty in an ordered pattern; the paper uses an 'oxygen lattice parameter' aO to compare epitaxial templates—MgO, MgAl2O4, and Al2O3—as square or triangular oxygen lattices. The key mechanistic insight is that Al2O3(0001) is chemically inert toward the Nb–O system at 1000 °C, so the growth phase diagram contains only Nb, NbO, and NbO2, whereas MgO and MgAl2O4 produce Mg–Nb–O alloy phases at high temperature. The (111) plane is selected because it is the natural, lower-energy surface for vacancy-ordered NbO. The narrowness of the phase window, roughly 5 mTorr between Nb and NbO2, is what allows stoichiometry control.

What would settle it

A long-exposure synchrotron XRD or atom-probe composition map of the 7 mTorr Al2O3 film that reveals elemental Nb, which superconducts at about 9.2 K, or NbO2 inclusions would falsify the assignment of the 1.37 K transition to vacancy-ordered NbO; conversely, a film with a residual resistivity ratio near the bulk value (above 100) and a sharp specific-heat jump at Tc would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that epitaxial (111)-oriented NbO films with the vacancy-ordered rock-salt structure, in which a quarter of both the Nb and O sites are empty in an ordered pattern, can be grown phase-pure at 1000 °C on Al2O3(0001) within a narrow oxygen nozzle pressure window of about 7–12 mTorr. The Al2O3 substrate suppresses the Mg–Nb–O alloy formation that dominates growth on MgO(001) and MgAl2O4, and the (111) orientation, promoted by the hexagonal Al2O3 surface, avoids the high-energy, vacancy-broken (001) surface. The films show metallic transport and zero-resistance superconducting transitions, with Tc(0) = 1.37 K at 7 mTorr, 1.27 K at 10 mTorr, and 0.67 K at 12 mTorr, and STEM images resolve the ordered vacancies directly. The 7 mTorr film may be slightly oxygen-deficient NbO1−δ, which the authors note has a bulk Tc of 1.37 K, matching their highest value.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central claim depends on the Al2O3-grown films really being single-phase NbO: the identification relies on XRD peak positions and STEM images rather than direct composition measurements, and the 7 mTorr sample (the one with the highest Tc) may contain oxygen vacancies or trace Nb metal below the detection limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NbO should be added to the short list of stoichiometric binary oxide superconductors that can be grown as epitaxial thin films, enabling integration with other oxides and superconductor-oxide heterostructures.
  • The substrate-selection rule implicit in this work—prioritize chemical stability over lattice match—should guide high-temperature MBE of other oxides with uncommon oxidation states.
  • The correlation between oxygen pressure and Tc (1.37, 1.27, 0.67 K) indicates that Tc in NbO films is tunable through stoichiometry and vacancy content, offering a parameter to study the pairing mechanism.
  • Twin-domain formation and the lack of a self-limited growth mode identify the next obstacles: buffer layers with cubic symmetry and high chemical stability could expand the growth window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1.37 K transition in the 7 mTorr film indeed comes from oxygen-deficient NbO1−δ rather than from a hidden Nb-rich phase, then NbO behaves like a conventional superconductor whose Tc responds to band filling, and engineering the vacancy concentration could push Tc above the bulk value.
  • The same inert-hexagonal-substrate strategy might apply to other vacancy-ordered rock-salt oxides such as TiO and VO, which suffer from alloying when grown on MgO-based substrates.
  • The six-fold twinning on Al2O3(0001) implies that two NbO(111) domains are rotated by 60°; verifying whether these twin boundaries act as weak links or vortex pinning centers would require transport measurements on patterned single-domain films.
  • A direct test of the assignment would be measurement of the upper critical field anisotropy on the 10 mTorr film: single-phase NbO should follow conventional dirty-limit behavior, whereas a Nb-rich secondary phase would produce an anisotropic or multi-step transition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports MBE growth of vacuum-ordered rock-salt NbO thin films on MgO, MgAl2O4, and Al2O3 substrates, with a comparative phase diagram and transport characterization. The authors identify Al2O3(0001) as the optimal substrate for high-temperature growth, leading to epitaxial (111)-oriented NbO films. Three Al2O3 samples grown at P_O2 = 7, 10, and 12 mTorr show superconducting transitions with Tc values up to 1.37 K, which the authors compare to bulk NbO single crystals. The paper claims that the vacancy-ordered rock-salt structure is unambiguously demonstrated and that the films are single-phase.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this work would expand the family of epitaxial thin-film superconductors to a vacancy-ordered rock-salt oxide with an uncommon oxidation state, and it provides a systematic substrate comparison and phase diagrams that are valuable for the oxide MBE community. The paper is strengthened by multiple independent structural probes (XRD, RHEED, STEM), a clear demonstration of vacancy ordering in the 10 mTorr sample, and transport measurements showing resistive transitions. The explicit comparison of growth on three substrates and the identification of Al2O3 as a chemically stable platform are useful contributions. However, the absence of direct composition analysis for the Al2O3 films, especially the sample with the highest Tc, leaves a load-bearing gap in the interpretation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Al2O3 (0001) and Discussion, Fig. 4, Table I] The identification of the 7 mTorr sample as stoichiometric, single-phase NbO is not established by composition analysis. The paper itself states that "Nb-rich growth conditions can yield either oxygen-deficient NbO1−δ or Nb-NbO mixed phases" and notes that NbO0.96 has Tc = 1.37 K, "nearly matching our highest Tc for the Nb-rich PO2 = 7 mTorr sample." Since no RBS, quantified EDS, or XPS is reported for the Al2O3 films, the possibility that the 1.37 K transition arises from Nb-rich NbO1−δ or a small-volume Nb-rich secondary phase is not excluded. The claim that the films are "controlled NbO" with Tc "comparable to bulk single crystals" therefore requires either direct stoichiometry measurements or a suitably qualified statement that the highest-Tc films are oxygen-deficient NbO1−δ.
  2. [Conclusion and Fig. 4g] The conclusion states that "the vacancy-ordered rock-salt structure in thin films is unambiguously demonstrated," but the STEM evidence for vacancy ordering is shown only for the 10 mTorr sample (Fig. 4g). The 7 and 12 mTorr samples, which also show superconductivity, are characterized only by XRD and RHEED, and the 7 mTorr sample shows transmission RHEED spots attributed to excess Nb. The manuscript should clarify explicitly which samples have confirmed vacancy ordering, and temper the global claim if it is intended to apply to all films.
  3. [Transport and superconductivity evidence] The superconducting transitions are demonstrated by resistivity alone; no magnetization or specific heat data are presented. Given that the 7 mTorr sample is suspected to be Nb-rich and that elemental Nb has Tc ≈ 9.2 K, a percolating Nb-rich secondary phase could in principle contribute to the zero-resistance transition. A magnetic susceptibility measurement (field-cooled and zero-field-cooled) for at least the 7 mTorr sample would support the interpretation of bulk superconductivity intrinsic to the NbO phase.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Al2O3 (0001), text vs Table I] The superconducting Tc for the 12 mTorr sample is given as 0.62 K in the main text but 0.67 K in Table I; please correct this inconsistency and state the criterion used to define Tc (e.g., mid-resistance, zero-resistance) for the Al2O3 samples, since the MgAl2O4 samples are explicitly defined by half-resistance.
  2. [Fig. 4j and Table I] The out-of-plane critical-field fits use the WHH formula for the 7 and 10 mTorr samples but the Gorter-Casimir model for the 12 mTorr sample; please justify the different choice or use a consistent fitting procedure.
  3. [Al2O3 (0001), RHEED discussion] The phrase "surface-localized off-stoichiometries" is somewhat speculative; consider rephrasing to describe the RHEED and XRD observations without implying a specific atomic-scale distribution of excess Nb or O.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the structural and superconducting claims rest on direct measurements and independent bulk comparisons, not on self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental synthesis and characterization study, and its claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The superconducting transition temperatures are direct resistive measurements, and the only quantitative extractions are standard Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg and Gorter-Casimir fits to the measured field-dependent resistivity, which are parameterizations rather than predictions forced by fitted inputs. The comparison of Tc = 1.37 K to bulk NbO0.96 comes from an independent prior measurement (Okaz and Keesom, Ref. [14]), not from the present data or from a self-citation. The self-citation to the authors' previous Ti-O study (Ref. [21]) concerns the growth apparatus, the nozzle-pressure configuration, and a general diffusion-enabled growth idea; it is not load-bearing for the central claims of NbO phase purity or superconductivity. The phase identification relies on XRD, RSM, and HAADF-STEM showing vacancy ordering, and while the absence of direct composition analysis is a legitimate correctness concern, it is not circular reasoning: the paper does not assume the conclusion in its evidence. No equation in the paper is defined in terms of the result it is used to support, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper's own caveat that Nb-rich conditions can yield oxygen-deficient NbO1−δ or Nb-NbO mixtures weakens the attribution of the 1.37 K transition to stoichiometric vacancy-ordered NbO, but that is an evidentiary limitation, not a circular derivation. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, and any circularity score is consequently low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The central claim rests on standard characterization assumptions and on independent cited bulk measurements. The only fitted quantities are critical-field extrapolations, which are not used to establish superconductivity.

free parameters (1)
  • Hc2(0) and coherence length from WHH/Gorter-Casimir fits = Hc2(0) = 0.053 to 0.141 T, xi(0) = 48 to 79 nm
    Obtained by fitting the temperature dependence of the upper critical field to standard models; these are parameter extractions, not assumptions of the superconductivity claim.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Bulk NbO reference values (Tc = 1.61 K, low-temperature resistivity about 0.1 micro-ohm cm) from Refs. 13, 14, and 30 are accepted as correct.
    Used to support the repeated comparison of film properties to bulk single crystals.
  • domain assumption The XRD and STEM characterization correctly identifies the films as single-phase vacancy-ordered NbO, including the discrimination from NbO2 and Nb.
    The central claim of single-phase superconducting NbO films depends on this identification.
  • domain assumption Van der Pauw resistivity measurements with Al wire contacts on 30 nm films reflect the intrinsic film transport, not contact artifacts or substrate conduction.
    Superconductivity is demonstrated only through resistance transitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconducting vacancy-ordered rock-salt NbO films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IYDAKYMR

@misc{pith2026250514997,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconducting vacancy-ordered rock-salt NbO films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IYDAKYMR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14997}
}
abstract

We report molecular beam epitaxy synthesis of vacancy-ordered rocksalt NbO thin films which display superconductivity. A comparative study of substrates identifies Al$_2$O$_3$ (0001) as the optimal platform for realizing high-quality, single-phase films when growing at temperatures exceeding 1000 $^\circ$C. The controlled NbO films exhibit superconductivity with critical temperatures up to $T_\mathrm{c}$ = 1.37 K, comparable to bulk single crystals. This work addresses the fundamental bottlenecks encountered in the high-temperature epitaxy of compounds with uncommon oxidation states, while expanding the scope of available thin-film superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14997 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Crystal structure of vacancy-ordered rock-salt NbO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Growth of Nb-O on MgO (001). (a) A growth phase diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. there was no evidence of alloying with Al-O species. Therefore, we hypothesize that despite the largest lat￾tice mismatch of approximately −7.7 %, Al2O3 may be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This phase diagram is distinguished from the former two in that it reflects only the Nb-O system without any alloys (Fig. 4a). In contrast to MgO and MgAl2O4 where excessive oxidation led to alloy forma￾tion, here we can see the formation of a rutile NbO2 phase in high…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. I. Khomskii, Transition metal compounds(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

  2. [2]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 1039 (1998)

  3. [3]

    Zaanen, G

    J. Zaanen, G. Sawatzky, and J. Allen, Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds, Physical review letters 55, 418 (1985)

  4. [4]

    Cox and A

    D. Cox and A. Sleight, Crystal structure of ba2bi3+ bi5+ o6, Solid State Communications 19, 969 (1976)

  5. [5]

    Johnston, A

    S. Johnston, A. Mukherjee, I. Elfimov, M. Berciu, and G. A. Sawatzky, Charge disproportionation with- out charge transfer in the rare-earth-element nickelates as a possible mechanism for the metal-insulator transi- tion, Physical review letters 112, 106404 (2014)

  6. [6]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, et al., Signatures of super- conductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature 621, 493 (2023)

  7. [7]

    Y. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. L¨ u, S. Li, R. Zou, and Y. Zhao, Antiperovskites with exceptional functionali- ties, Advanced Materials 32, 1905007 (2020)

  8. [8]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Supercon- ductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate, Nature 572, 624 (2019)

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    W. J. Kim, M. A. Smeaton, C. Jia, B. H. Goodge, B.-G. Cho, K. Lee, M. Osada, D. Jost, A. V. Ievlev, B. Moritz, et al., Geometric frustration of jahn–teller order in the infinite-layer lattice, Nature 615, 237 (2023)

  2. [10]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C.- T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, et al., Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film la3ni2o7, Nature , 1 (2024)

  3. [11]

    Mairoser, J

    T. Mairoser, J. A. Mundy, A. Melville, D. Hodash, P. Cueva, R. Held, A. Glavic, J. Schubert, D. A. Muller, D. G. Schlom, et al., High-quality euo thin films the easy way via topotactic transformation, Nature communica- tions 6, 7716 (2015)

  4. [12]

    H. Jeen, W. S. Choi, M. D. Biegalski, C. M. Folkman, I.- C. Tung, D. D. Fong, J. W. Freeland, D. Shin, H. Ohta, M. F. Chisholm, et al., Reversible redox reactions in an epitaxially stabilized srcoo x oxygen sponge, Nature ma- terials 12, 1057 (2013)

  5. [13]

    J. Hulm, C. Jones, R. Hein, and J. Gibson, Superconduc- tivity in the tio and nbo systems, Journal of Low Tem- perature Physics 7, 291 (1972)

  6. [14]

    A. M. Okaz and P. Keesom, Specific heat and magneti- zation of the superconducting monoxides: Nbo and tio, Physical Review B 12, 4917 (1975)

  7. [15]

    A. K. Efimenko, N. Hollmann, K. Hoefer, J. Weinen, D. Takegami, K. K. Wolff, S. G. Altendorf, Z. Hu, A. D. Rata, A. C. Komarek, et al., Electronic signature of the vacancy ordering in nbo (nb 3 o 3), Physical Review B 96, 195112 (2017)

  8. [16]

    J. K. Burdett and T. Hughbanks, Niobium oxide (nbo) and titanium oxide (tio): a study of the structural and electronic stability of structures derived from rock salt, Journal of the American Chemical Society 106, 3101 (1984)

  9. [17]

    Z. Liu, X. Zhou, D. Gall, and S. Khare, First-principles investigation of the structural, mechanical and electronic properties of the nbo-structured 3d, 4d and 5d transition metal nitrides, Computational materials science 84, 365 (2014)

  10. [18]

    X. Zhou, C. Gu, G. Song, D. Ma, L. Fang, C. Zhou, Y. Zhao, Y. Liang, and S. Wang, Synthesis, crystal struc- tures, mechanical properties, and formation mechanisms of cubic tungsten nitrides, Chemistry of Materials 34, 9261 (2022)

  11. [19]

    Janninck and D

    R. Janninck and D. Whitmore, Electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power of niobium dioxide, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 27, 1183 (1966)

  12. [20]

    Rempel, S

    Valeeva, . Rempel, S. Naumov, N. Kuranova, and H. Shrottner, Niobium monoxide nbo single crystal grow- ing by floating zone method, Materials Characterization 205, 113265 (2023)

  13. [21]

    J. R. Kim, S. Glotzer, A. Llanos, S. Salmani-Rezaie, and J. Falson, High-temperature diffusion enabled epitaxy of the ti–o system, Advanced Materials 37, 2413447 (2025)

  14. [22]

    Y. Gao, Y. J. Kim, and S. A. Chambers, Preparation and characterization of epitaxial iron oxide films, Journal of materials research 13, 2003 (1998)

  15. [23]

    A. Rata, A. Chezan, M. Haverkort, H. Hsieh, H.-J. Lin, C. Chen, L. Tjeng, and T. Hibma, Growth and properties of strained vo x thin films with controlled stoichiometry, Physical Review B 69, 075404 (2004)

  16. [24]

    Budde, C

    M. Budde, C. Tschammer, P. Franz, J. Feldl, M. Ram- steiner, R. Goldhahn, M. Feneberg, N. Barsan, A. Oprea, and O. Bierwagen, Structural, optical, and electrical properties of unintentionally doped nio layers grown on mgo by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy, Journal of A...

  17. [25]

    F. Li, Y. Zou, M.-G. Han, K. Foyevtsova, H. Shin, S. Lee, C. Liu, K. Shin, S. D. Albright, R. Sutarto, et al., Single- crystalline epitaxial tio film: A metal and superconduc- tor, similar to ti metal, Science Advances 7, eabd4248 (2021)

  18. [26]

    Ananta, Synthesis, formation and characterization of mg4nb2o9 powders, Materials Letters 58, 2530 (2004)

    S. Ananta, Synthesis, formation and characterization of mg4nb2o9 powders, Materials Letters 58, 2530 (2004)

  19. [27]

    Kimura, K

    R. Kimura, K. Kaminaga, T. Kobayashi, Y. Cho, S. Maruyama, A. Maeda, and Y. Matsumoto, Elevating the superconducting temperature in epitaxially stabilized rock-salt nbo, Chemistry of Materials 36, 5028 (2024)

  20. [28]

    Prostakova, J

    V. Prostakova, J. Chen, E. Jak, and S. A. Decterov, Ex- perimental study and thermodynamic optimization of the cao–nio, mgo–nio and nio–sio2 systems, Calphad 37, 1 (2012)

  21. [29]

    Burnus, J

    R. Burnus, J. K¨ ohler, and A. Simon, Mn3nb6o11 und mg3nb6o11-darstellung von einkristallen und struk- turverfeinerung/mn3nb6o11 and mg3nb6o11-preparation of single crystals and structure refinement, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung B 42, 536 (1987)

  22. [30]

    Honig, W

    J. Honig, W. Wahnsiedler, and P. Eklund, Electrical properties of nbo in high magnetic fields, Journal of Solid 9 State Chemistry 6, 203 (1973)

  23. [31]

    Werthamer, E

    N. Werthamer, E. Helfand, and P. Hohenberg, Tempera- ture and purity dependence of the superconducting crit- ical field, h c 2. iii. electron spin and spin-orbit effects, Physical Review 147, 295 (1966)

  24. [32]

    C. J. Gorter and H. Casimir, On supraconductivity i, Physica 1, 306 (1934)

  25. [33]

    A. D. Rata and T. Hibma, Strain-induced properties of epitaxial vox thin films, The European Physical Jour- nal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 43, 195 (2005)

  26. [34]

    Wander, I

    A. Wander, I. Bush, and N. Harrison, Stability of rocksalt polar surfaces: An ab initio study of mgo (111) and nio (111), Physical Review B 68, 233405 (2003)

  27. [35]

    W. Liu, X. Liu, W. Zheng, and Q. Jiang, Surface energies of several ceramics with nacl structure, Surface science 600, 257 (2006)

  28. [36]

    M. B. Tellekamp, J. C. Shank, and W. A. Doolittle, Molecular beam epitaxy of lithium niobium oxide mul- tifunctional materials, Journal of Crystal Growth 463, 156 (2017)

  29. [37]

    A. A. Bolzan, C. Fong, B. J. Kennedy, and C. J. Howard, A powder neutron diffraction study of semiconducting and metallic niobium dioxide, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 113, 9 (1994)

  30. [38]

    H. P. Nair, J. P. Ruf, N. J. Schreiber, L. Miao, M. L. Grandon, D. J. Baek, B. H. Goodge, J. P. Ruff, L. F. Kourkoutis, K. M. Shen, et al., Demystifying the growth of superconducting sr2ruo4 thin films, APL Materials 6, 10.1063/1.5053084 (2018)

  31. [39]

    Ahadi, L

    K. Ahadi, L. Galletti, Y. Li, S. Salmani-Rezaie, W. Wu, and S. Stemmer, Enhancing superconductivity in srtio3 films with strain, Science advances 5, eaaw0120 (2019)

  32. [40]

    Hubbard and D

    K. Hubbard and D. Schlom, Thermodynamic stability of binary oxides in contact with silicon, Journal of Materials Research 11, 2757 (1996)

  33. [41]

    C. R. H. McRae, H. Wang, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, T. Brecht, A. Dunsworth, D. P. Pappas, and J. Mutus, Materials loss measurements using superconducting mi- crowave resonators, Review of Scientific Instruments 91, 10.1063/5.0017378 (2020)

  34. [42]

    Siddiqi, Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 875 (2021)

    I. Siddiqi, Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 875 (2021). 10 TABLE II. Structural data and epitaxial relationships Compounds Space group Out-of-plane In-plane Al2O3 R3c (167) [0001] [11 20] Nb Im3m (229) [110] [1 10] NbO P m3m (221)...

  35. [100]

    zone axis. Although a thorough structural iden- tification requires additional investigation, the cross- sectional feature of the (Nb,Mg)O phase appears anal- ogous to the rock-salt structure of MgO substrate layer. The STEM-EDS analysis shows a low but persistent Mg signal th...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.