Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Performance Analysis of Fluid Antenna System under Spatially-Correlated Rician Fading Channels

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a fluid antenna receiver with N switchable ports under spatially correlated Rician fading has an outage probability that falls roughly with port count, with planar port layouts beating linear ones.

desk verdict The Rician FAS analysis is a useful extension, but the 'exact' joint PDF drops a phase-dependent cross term, and the high-N slope argument holds the wrong quantity fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15200 v1 pith:JOPP6KF6 submitted 2025-05-21 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Jiangsheng Huangfu , Zhengyu Song , Tianwei Hou , Anna Li , Yuanwei Liu , Arumugam Nallanathan , Kai-Kit Wong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT MSC 94A05
keywords fluidantennasystemRicianfadingoutageprobabilityergodicratespatialcorrelationdiversityorderuniformlineararrayplanar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes a receiver whose single antenna can be reconfigured among N positions, or ports, over a small space—a fluid antenna system—under Rician fading with spatial correlation between ports. It claims to provide exact expressions for the joint statistics of the port gains and for the outage probability, plus closed-form upper and lower bounds and ergodic-rate bounds. The central message is that the outage probability falls steeply as N grows, with diversity order approximately N, and that arranging ports on a planar grid (UPA) outperforms a linear arrangement (ULA) for the same number of ports. A sympathetic reading takes this as evidence that fluid antenna systems are a viable single-RF-chain alternative to conventional antenna arrays in line-of-sight-rich 6G environments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a conditional-Rician joint distribution of the port amplitudes. It asserts that, with port 1 as reference, |h_n| given |h_1| = m_1 is Rician with noncentrality parameter $\sqrt$($ρ_n^{2}$ $m_1^{2}$ + (1−$ρ_n^{2}$)$A^{2}$), where ρ_n is the J0 Bessel correlation between ports and A is the line-of-sight amplitude. This factorization reduces the N-dimensional outage integral to a single integral over m_1 with a product of Marcum Q-functions for the other ports, and it is what every later bound and diversity-order result inherits.

What would settle it

Run a Monte Carlo simulation of the channel model in Eq. (10) with κ > 0, fix |h_1| = m_1, and compare the empirical distribution of |h_2| with the Rician density having noncentrality $\sqrt$($ρ_2^{2}$ $m_1^{2}$ + (1−$ρ_2^{2}$)$A^{2}$) and variance $σ^{2}$(1−$ρ_2^{2}$); if the empirical distribution shifts with the phase of h_1, the joint PDF in Eq. (12) and the outage expression (15) are not exact. The same comparison at κ = 0 should match, isolating the phase-dependence error.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, under spatially correlated Rician fading, the port channel amplitudes of an Rx-SISO-FAS have a joint density of the product form in Eq. (12), in which each non-reference port's amplitude, conditioned on the reference port's amplitude, is Rician with a noncentrality parameter involving the reference amplitude and the line-of-sight component. From this joint density, the outage probability reduces to a one-dimensional integral (Theorem 1, Eq. (15)) whose integrand is the Rician density of the reference port times products of first-order Marcum Q-functions. The same machinery yields lower and upper outage bounds, closed-form ergodic-rate bounds, and asymptotic results: diversity order approximately N at high SNR, an infinite slope in N, and a zero slope in the Rician factor at large κ. The numerical results support the qualitative conclusions that FAS outperforms a fixed-position antenna, can beat an L-branch MRC system, and works better with UPA than ULA ports.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the joint density assumes that, once the magnitude of the reference port's channel is fixed, each other port's channel magnitude follows a Rician distribution whose noncentrality depends only on that magnitude—not on the phase of the reference channel; in the paper's own channel model the phase matters whenever a line-of-sight component is present, so the 'exact' expressions are unstated approximations for κ > 0 and exact only for κ = 0.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At high SNR, the outage probability behaves roughly like (1/γ_th)^N, so each additional port adds about one order of diversity; even a small fluid antenna with dozens of ports can reach very low outage.
  • For a fixed physical size, increasing the number of ports N lowers outage substantially, and the slope of the outage curve steepens with N, so port density matters more than array footprint.
  • A planar (UPA) port arrangement yields lower outage than a linear (ULA) one with the same N because the Euclidean port distances are larger and the Bessel correlations are smaller.
  • A single-RF-chain FAS can outperform an L-branch MRC combiner once N is sufficiently large (for example, N > 30 beats L = 5 in the paper's settings), at lower hardware cost.
  • A strong line-of-sight component helps at high SNR but degrades outage at low SNR, and increasing the Rician factor flattens the outage curve, so LoS strength should be treated as a system parameter rather than a universal blessing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: Because the conditional-Rician step (A.2) ignores the phase of the reference channel, the formulas labeled exact should be read as approximations for κ > 0; the Monte Carlo agreement shown in the paper may hide errors at moderate κ or when ρ_n is large.
  • Editorial: The diversity-order claim d ≈ N likely survives the phase issue, since the N-fold product structure remains, but a proof that starts from the true conditional distribution could tighten or correct the order at finite SNR.
  • Editorial: The UPA-versus-ULA comparison suggests an optimization problem the paper does not solve: for a given rectangular footprint, the number of rows and columns that minimizes outage for fixed N can be chosen using the same correlation formulas.
  • Editorial: The same joint-distribution method could be extended to transmit-side FAS and dual-MIMO-FAS by conditioning on two reference ports, where the phase-dependence issue would need to be handled explicitly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript analyzes a single-input single-output fluid antenna system (Rx-SISO-FAS) with N candidate ports under spatially correlated Rician fading. It proposes an exact joint PDF/CDF for the port amplitudes, an outage-probability expression, closed-form upper and lower bounds, ergodic-rate formulas, and diversity-order claims, for both ULA and UPA port layouts. The results are supported by Monte Carlo simulations and comparisons with fixed-antenna and MRC benchmarks. The paper's principal analytical object is Lemma 1, whose Eq. (12) is used to derive all subsequent outage and rate results.

Significance. If correct, the exact expressions would extend FAS performance analysis from Rayleigh and Nakagami-m models to Rician channels with arbitrary port correlation, and the UPA comparison would be a useful design insight. The manuscript is well organized, includes several useful reductions (the kappa=0 and N=1 cases limit to known results), and the ULA/UPA treatment is systematic. However, the central exactness claim is not supported: Lemma 1 is an approximation for kappa>0, and the phase dependence that is dropped propagates into Theorem 1 and the downstream results. The Monte Carlo agreement does not test the exact joint law, so the claimed exactness is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A / Lemma 1 (Eq. (12))] The conditional density asserted in Eq. (A.2) is not a consequence of the channel model in Eq. (10). From Eq. (10), h_n given h_1 is CN(rho_n h_1 + (1-rho_n)A, sigma^2(1-rho_n^2)) for n>=2, so the Rician noncentrality parameter conditioned only on |h_1|=m_1 is sqrt(rho_n^2 m_1^2 + (1-rho_n)^2 A^2 + 2 rho_n (1-rho_n) m_1 A cos(theta)), where theta = arg(h_1), and theta is not uniform given m_1 when A>0: its conditional density is proportional to exp(2 A m_1 cos(theta)/sigma^2). Eq. (A.2) drops the cross term and uses (1-rho_n^2)A^2 in its place. Consequently Eq. (12) is exact only for A=0 (kappa=0); for kappa>0 it is an unstated approximation, not an identity.
  2. [Theorem 1 / Eq. (15) and downstream results] Because Lemma 1 is the input to Lemma 2, the outage probability in Eq. (15), Corollaries 1-4, Theorem 2, Corollaries 5-6, and Theorem 3 for the UPA configuration all inherit the unverified approximation from Eq. (A.2). The curves labeled 'analytical' in Figs. 3-5 are computed from Eq. (15) or its corollaries, so agreement with Monte Carlo simulations at selected parameter points does not certify the exactness claim; a direct check would simulate the phase-preserving conditional law of Eq. (10) and compare the resulting empirical CDF with Eq. (15), or compute the phase-averaged integral of the true conditional Rician density numerically.
  3. [Appendix E / Corollary 5 (Eqs. (E.1)-(E.2), (36))] The claimed lower bound on the ergodic rate is not proven. Eq. (E.1) is an upper bound on the CDF F(x), but the transition to Eq. (E.2) discards the factor (1-e^{-x}) and the terms involving kappa(1-rho_n^2) and 2 sqrt(kappa x(kappa+1)); dropping terms from an upper bound does not in general yield a lower bound, and no inequality is shown to justify the '>=' in Eq. (36). In addition, the constants a_i and b_i contain c, which is never assigned a value, so the expression is not fully specified as a closed-form result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (14)] The outage event is written as SNR_FAS/SNRn = |h_FAS|^2/(A^2+sigma^2) < gamma_th, but SNR_FAS/SNRn is |h_FAS|^2/|hn|^2 by the preceding definitions; the normalization used in the subsequent integrals should be defined consistently.
  2. [Corollary 3 / Eq. (18)] The series representation indexes n=1...N with rho_1=0, but the product over n=2...N in Eq. (16) is the starting point; please confirm that the n=1 term is the correct Rician CDF in this representation.
  3. [Section V / Fig. 9] The ergodic-rate simulations use only 10^2 Monte Carlo samples, which is quite low for rate curves; reporting confidence intervals or increasing the number of samples would make the verification more convincing.
  4. [Proposition 2 / Eq. (28)] The proof uses 'approximately equal' signs inside a limit calculation; a formal diversity-order statement should be phrased as a limit inferior/superior or with explicit asymptotic bounds.
  5. [Throughout] There are minor typographical issues, including 'UP A' with a space in several places and 'the OP' at the start of Theorem 3; these should be corrected in a revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the outage and ergodic-rate derivations are self-contained from the assumed channel model, with no fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

No circular derivation is present. The paper's claimed results—the joint PDF in Lemma 1 (Eq. 12), the outage probability in Theorem 1 (Eq. 15), the bounds in Corollaries 1–4, and the ergodic-rate expressions in Theorem 2 and Corollaries 5–6—are derived from the assumed channel model (10) through explicit conditioning, Marcum Q-function identities, and bounding inequalities in Appendices A–E. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction; the free constant c in Corollary 2 is an artifact of an analytic bound, not a fitted value. The Monte Carlo simulations use the same channel model, so they serve as consistency checks rather than independent benchmarks, but the analytical curves are not regressed onto the simulation points, so this is not circularity. The self-citations ([22], [40], [41], [43], [45]) supply the FAS channel/correlation model and prior FAS background; these are model inputs, not load-bearing justifications for the new derivations, and the derivations themselves are written out in the appendices. Separately, there is a mathematical accuracy concern unrelated to circularity: in Appendix A, Eq. (A.2) conditions only on m1=|h1|, whereas under model (10) the conditional law of h_n given h1 has mean rho_n h1 + (1-rho_n)A, whose magnitude depends on arg(h1); therefore the claimed 'exact' joint PDF is actually an approximation for kappa>0. That concern affects correctness of the 'exact' label, but it is not an equivalence-to-inputs or self-citation issue, so the circularity score remains 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a one-factor correlation model and a conditional Rician step that is not exact under the paper's own channel model. The only free numeric knob is the bound constant c. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • c = unspecified
    Introduced in Corollary 2 and Appendix D as a constant greater than one in the Gaussian Q-function lower bound. It enters the outage upper bound and the ergodic-rate lower bound through alpha(c), but the paper never specifies its value, so the plotted bounds are not reproducible.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption One-factor spatial correlation model in Eq. (10): each port shares a common Gaussian pair (x0,y0) and the LoS term A is identical across ports.
    This is the basis for Lemma 1. It is not the full Jakes covariance and omits LoS phase progression across port positions; the paper does not justify it physically.
  • ad hoc to paper Conditional Rician parameter of |h_n| given |h_1| depends only on |h_1| and equals sqrt(rho_n^2 m1^2 + (1-rho_n^2)A^2).
    This is the step from Eq. (A.1) to Eq. (A.2). Under Eq. (10) the true parameter is |rho_n h_1 + (1-rho_n)A|, which depends on the phase of h_1. The equality holds only for A=0.
  • standard math The Chernoff-type lower bound on the Gaussian Q-function in Eq. (D.2) holds for any c>1 with the stated alpha.
    Taken from reference [56]; it is a standard bound, but the free parameter c is never assigned, so the resulting closed-form bounds are not fully specified.
  • domain assumption Perfect CSI at the receiver and selection of the port with the largest |h_n|.
    Stated in Section I and Eq. (11); it is the operational premise of the FAS model, not proven or tested.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Performance Analysis of Fluid Antenna System under Spatially-Correlated Rician Fading Channels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOPP6KF6

@misc{pith2026250515200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Performance Analysis of Fluid Antenna System under Spatially-Correlated Rician Fading Channels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOPP6KF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15200}
}
abstract

Fluid antenna systems (FAS) are among the most promising technologies for the sixth generation (6G) mobile communication networks. Unlike traditional fixed-position multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, a FAS possesses position reconfigurability to switch on-demand among $N$ predefined ports over a prescribed space. This paper explores the performance of a single-input single-output (SISO) model with a fixed-position antenna transmitter and a single-antenna FAS receiver, referred to as the Rx-SISO-FAS model, under spatially-correlated Rician fading channels. Our contributions include exact expressions and closed-form bounds for the outage probability of the Rx-SISO-FAS model, as well as exact and closed-form lower bounds for the ergodic rate. Importantly, we also analyze the performance considering both uniform linear array (ULA) and uniform planar array (UPA) configurations for the ports of the FAS. To gain insights, we evaluate the diversity order of the proposed model and our analytical results indicate that with a fixed overall system size, increasing the number of ports, $N$, significantly decreases the outage performance of FAS under different Rician fading factors. Our numerical results further demonstrate that: $i)$ the Rx-SISO-FAS model can enhance performance under spatially-correlated Rician fading channels over the fixed-position antenna counterpart; $ii)$ the Rician factor negatively impacts performance in the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime; $iii$) FAS can outperform an $L$ branches maximum ratio combining (MRC) system under Rician fading channels; and $iv)$ when the number of ports is identical, UPA outperforms ULA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15200 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The ULA port configuration for FAS. tions for the ER. The diversity order is derived based on the upper bound of OP, which is shown to be only related to the number of ports, N, when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is high enough. • Then we consider both ULA and UPA models for FAS when deriving expressions for the OP and ER. Through numerical results, we compare the performance of ULA and UPA, showing that the UPA p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The UPA port configuration for FAS. γth of the Rx-SISO-FAS model can be found in closed form as RˆN,κ = 1 ln (2) Z∞ 0 1 − Fˆ (x) 1 + x dx ≥ 1 ln (2) X N n=2 X s⊆{1,...,N} |s|=n (−1)n+1 Y i⊆s ai Z∞ 0 e − P i⊆s bix 1 + x dx = 1 ln (2) X N n=2 X s⊆{1,...,N} |s|=n (−1)n+1 Y i⊆s aie − P i⊆s bi Ei  − X i⊆s bi   , (36) where bi = c 1 − ρ 2 i (κ + 1), ai = e 1 [π(c−1)+2] −κ 2c √ ρi r 1 π (c − 1) [π (c − 1) + 2], and Ei(… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The OP against the number of ports N under different Rician fading factor κ and SNR threshold γth, where the analytical results are derived from (15). Proof. The OP expression can be found by substituting (40) into (16), thereby completing the proof. Corollary 8. An upper bound of the OP under Rician fading factor κ and the SNR threshold γth of the Rx-SISO-FAS model with UPA port configuration is found as p˜out (γth… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The OP against the Rician fading factor κ under different number of ports N when γth = 3 dB and γth = 6 dB. could be flattened in FAS with fewer ports. This indicates that increasing the transmission power can significantly enhance the outage performance of FAS but onl…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Upper and lower bounds of OP when γth = 5 dB and γth = 0 dB under different Rician fading factor κ. 100 101 102 Number of ports N 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Outage probability pout Solid lines: W =0.5 Dashed lines: W=2 Dotted lines: W=5 =0 =2 =10 W=0.5 simulation W=2 simu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The OP against the number of ports N under different Rician fading factor κ with γth = 2 dB. SNR regime, the upper bound can be a conservative estimate of OP. Further examination of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The ER against the number of ports N under different Rician fading factor κ. 100 101 102 Number of Ports N 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Outage Probability pout th=0 dB th=2 dB Solid lines: ULA Dashed lines: UPA =0 =2 =10 UPA simulation ULA simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figur…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The OP against the number of ports N under ULA and UPA port configurations with γth = 0 dB and γth = 2 dB. bounds, respectively. We can observe that as the number of ports N increases, both the upper and lower bounds are good to imitate the rising trend of the ER when…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The past, present, and fut ure of mobile communications,

    H. Viswanathan and M. Weldon, “The past, present, and fut ure of mobile communications,” Bell Labs Tech. J. , vol. 19, pp. 8–21, Aug. 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    On limits of wireless comm unications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,

    G. J. Foschini, and M. J. Gans, “On limits of wireless comm unications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,” Wireless Pers. Commun., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–335, Mar. 1998

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    An overvi ew of MIMO communications – A key to gigabit wireless,

    A. Paulraj, D. Gore, R. Nabar, and H. Bolcskei, “An overvi ew of MIMO communications – A key to gigabit wireless,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 198–218, Feb. 2004

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Diversity and multiplexing: A funda mental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels,

    L. Zheng and D. Tse, “Diversity and multiplexing: A funda mental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1073–1096, May 2003

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Performance e n- hancement of multiuser MIMO wireless communication system s,

    K. K. Wong, R. D. Murch, and K. Ben Letaief, “Performance e n- hancement of multiuser MIMO wireless communication system s,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1960–1970, Dec. 2002

    work page 1960

  6. [6]

    A joint-chann el diagonalization for multiuser MIMO antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, R. D. Murch, and K. Ben Letaief, “A joint-chann el diagonalization for multiuser MIMO antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 773–786, Jul. 2003

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Duality, ac hievable rates, and sum-rate capacity of Gaussian MIMO broadcast channels,

    S. Vishwanath, N. Jindal, and A. Goldsmith, “Duality, ac hievable rates, and sum-rate capacity of Gaussian MIMO broadcast channels, ” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2658–2668, Oct. 2003. 13

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Zero-forci ng methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channe ls,

    Q. Spencer, A. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero-forci ng methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channe ls,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. , vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 461–471, Feb. 2004

    work page 2004

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,

    E. G. Larsson, O. Edfors, F. Tufvesson, and T. L. Marzetta , “Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 186–195, Feb. 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Energy and s pectral effi- ciency of very large multiuser MIMO systems,

    H. Q. Ngo, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, “Energy and s pectral effi- ciency of very large multiuser MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1436–1449, Apr. 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Extremely large-scale MIMO: Fundamentals, chal- lenges, solutions, and future directions,

    Z. Wang et al. , “Extremely large-scale MIMO: Fundamentals, chal- lenges, solutions, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 117–124, Jun. 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Application of non-orthogonal multiple access in LTE and 5G networks,

    Z. Ding et al. , “Application of non-orthogonal multiple access in LTE and 5G networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 185–191, Feb. 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    A survey of intelligent reflecting surfaces (I RSs): To- wards 6G wireless communication networks,

    J. Zhao, “A survey of intelligent reflecting surfaces (I RSs): To- wards 6G wireless communication networks,” [Online]. Avai lable: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04789, Nov. 2019

    1907 arXiv

  6. [14]

    An RIS-aided interference mitigation-based design for MIMO-NOMA in cellular networks,

    J. Li et al. , “An RIS-aided interference mitigation-based design for MIMO-NOMA in cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. & Netw., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 317–329, Mar. 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Performance analysis for large intelligent surfaces ena bled MIMO networks,

    T. Hou et al., “Performance analysis for large intelligent surfaces ena bled MIMO networks,” in Proc. IEEE Inter . Conf. Commun. (ICC), 7-11 Jun. 2020, Dublin, Ireland

    2020

  8. [16]

    MIMO assisted networks relying on intelligent reflective surfaces: A stochastic geometry based analysis,

    T. Hou et al., “MIMO assisted networks relying on intelligent reflective surfaces: A stochastic geometry based analysis,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 571–582, Jan. 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    MIMO and beamform ing solutions for 5G technology,

    F. W. V ook, A. Ghosh, and T. A. Thomas, “MIMO and beamform ing solutions for 5G technology,” in Proc. IEEE MTT-S Inter . Microw. Symp. (IMS2014), 1-6 Jun. 2014, Tampa, FL, USA

    2014

  10. [18]

    Hybrid digital and analog beamfor ming design for large-scale antenna arrays,

    F. Sohrabi and W. Y u, “Hybrid digital and analog beamfor ming design for large-scale antenna arrays,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 501–513, Apr. 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    Spectral efficiency of precoded 5G-NR i n single and multi-user scenarios under imperfect channel knowledg e: A compre- hensive guide for implementation,

    D. A. Urquiza Villalonga, H. OdetAlla, M. J. Fern´ andez -Getino Garcia, and A. Flizikowski, “Spectral efficiency of precoded 5G-NR i n single and multi-user scenarios under imperfect channel knowledg e: A compre- hensive guide for implementation,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 24 ...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Modeling and analyzing millimeter wave cellular systems,

    J. G. Andrews et al. , “Modeling and analyzing millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 403–430, Jan. 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    A speculative study on 6G,

    F. Tariq et al. , “A speculative study on 6G,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 118–125, Aug. 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Fluid ante nna system for 6G: When Bruce Lee inspires wireless communications,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Zhang, and Z. Zheng, “Fluid ante nna system for 6G: When Bruce Lee inspires wireless communications,” IET Elect. Lett., vol. 56, no. 24, pp. 1288–1290, Nov. 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    B ruce Lee- inspired fluid antenna system: Six research topics and the po tentials for 6G,

    K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, Y . Shen, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “B ruce Lee- inspired fluid antenna system: Six research topics and the po tentials for 6G,” Frontiers Commun. & Netw. , vol. 3, no. 853416, Mar. 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,

    W. K. New et al. , “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2407.03449, Jul. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Flexible liquid metal alloy (EGaIn) microstrip patch antenna,

    G. J. Hayes, J.-H. So, A. Qusba, M. D. Dickey, and G. Lazzi , “Flexible liquid metal alloy (EGaIn) microstrip patch antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 2151–2156, May 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    A liquid-metal monopole array with tunable frequency, gai n, and beam steering,

    A. M. Morishita, C. K. Y . Kitamura, A. T. Ohta, and W. A. Sh iroma, “A liquid-metal monopole array with tunable frequency, gai n, and beam steering,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 12, pp. 1388– 1391, 2013

    2013

  19. [27]

    Microfluidically rec onfigured wideband frequency-tunable liquid-metal monopole antenn a,

    A. Dey, R. Guldiken, and G. Mumcu, “Microfluidically rec onfigured wideband frequency-tunable liquid-metal monopole antenn a,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2572–2576, Jun. 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    A low-cost fluid switch for frequency-reconfigurable vival di antenna,

    C. Borda-Fortuny, K.-F. Tong, A. Al-Armaghany, and K.- K. Wong, “A low-cost fluid switch for frequency-reconfigurable vival di antenna,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 16, pp. 3151–3154, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    A multistate fre quency recon- figurable monopole antenna using fluidic channels,

    A. Singh, I. Goode, and C. E. Saavedra, “A multistate fre quency recon- figurable monopole antenna using fluidic channels,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 856–860, May 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Liqu id antennas: Past, present and future,

    Y . Huang, L. Xing, C. Song, S. Wang, and F. Elhouni, “Liqu id antennas: Past, present and future,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 2, pp. 473–487, Mar. 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Null steering in phased arrays by controlling the element positions,

    T. Ismail and M. Dawoud, “Null steering in phased arrays by controlling the element positions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1561–1566, Nov. 1991

    1991

  24. [32]

    Design and synthesis of antenna array with m ovable elements along semicircular paths,

    S. Basbug, “Design and synthesis of antenna array with m ovable elements along semicircular paths,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 3059–3062, 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    Sidelobe canceling for reconfigurable holographic metamaterial ant enna,

    M. C. Johnson, S. L. Brunton, N. B. Kundtz, and J. N. Kutz, “Sidelobe canceling for reconfigurable holographic metamaterial ant enna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1881–1886, Apr. 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Computa- tional polarimetric imaging using two-dimensional dynami c metasurface apertures,

    T. V . Hoang, V . Fusco, T. Fromenteze and O. Y urduseven, “ Computa- tional polarimetric imaging using two-dimensional dynami c metasurface apertures,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 2, pp. 488–497, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Reconfigurable holographic surfaces for ultra-massive MIMO in 6G: Practical design, optimization and implementat ion,

    R. Deng et al. , “Reconfigurable holographic surfaces for ultra-massive MIMO in 6G: Practical design, optimization and implementat ion,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2367–2379, Aug. 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    An efficient approach for optimi zing frequency reconfigurable pixel antennas using genetic algo rithms,

    S. Song and R. D. Murch, “An efficient approach for optimi zing frequency reconfigurable pixel antennas using genetic algo rithms,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 609–620, Feb. 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    Compact pattern reconfigura ble pixel antenna with diagonal pixel connections,

    L. Jing, M. Li and R. Murch, “Compact pattern reconfigura ble pixel antenna with diagonal pixel connections,” IEEE Trans. Antennas & Propag., vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 8951–8961, Oct. 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Design and implementation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas and experimental results for fluid ant enna multi- ple access,

    Y . Shen et al. , “Design and implementation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas and experimental results for fluid ant enna multi- ple access,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.09663, May 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    A pixel-based reconfigurable antenna design for fluid antenna systems,

    J. Zhang et al. , “A pixel-based reconfigurable antenna design for fluid antenna systems,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2406.05499, Jun. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Pe rformance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Pe rformance limits of fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    F luid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “F luid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    1950

  34. [42]

    Closed-for m expressions for spatial correlation parameters for perfor mance analysis of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Closed-for m expressions for spatial correlation parameters for perfor mance analysis of fluid antenna systems,” Elect. Lett., vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 454–457, Apr. 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    A new analy tical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,

    M. Khammassi, A. Kammoun and M.-S. Alouini, “A new analy tical ap- proximation of the fluid antenna system channel,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8843–8858, Dec. 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems,

    P . Ram´ ırez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, and K.-K. W ong, “A new spatial block-correlation model for fluid antenna systems, ” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun. , doi:10.1109/TWC.2024.3434509, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and dive rsity gain,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “ Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and dive rsity gain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 128–140, Jan. 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimiza- tion, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong and C.-B. Chae, “An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimiza- tion, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff and q-outage capacity,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5541–5556, Jun. 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Enhancing QoS through fluid antenna systems over corre lated Nakagami-m fading channels,

    L. Tlebaldiyeva, G. Nauryzbayev, S. Arzykulov, A. Elta wil, and T. Tsift- sis, “Enhancing QoS through fluid antenna systems over corre lated Nakagami-m fading channels,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. & Netw. Conf. (WCNC) , pp. 78–83, 10-13 Apr. 2022, Austin, TX, USA

    2022

  40. [48]

    Andrea Goldsmith, Wireless Communications , Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  41. [49]

    Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,

    H. Xu et al. , “Channel estimation for FAS-assisted multiuser mmWave systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 632–636, Mar. 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Successive B ayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna syste ms,

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, L. Dai, and R. W. Heath Jr, “Successive B ayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna syste ms,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2312.06551v3, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    M. K. Simon, Probability distributions involving Gaussian random variables: A handbook for engineers and scientists . Springer, 2002

    2002

  44. [52]

    Asymptotic and numerical aspects of the nonc entral Chi- Square distribution,

    N. Temme, “Asymptotic and numerical aspects of the nonc entral Chi- Square distribution,” Comput. & Math. with Appl. , vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 55–63, Mar. 1993

    1993

  45. [53]

    Ave rage outage duration of diversity systems over generalized fadi ng channels,

    Y oung-Chai Ko, A. Abdi, M.S. Alouini, and M. Kaveh, “Ave rage outage duration of diversity systems over generalized fadi ng channels,” in 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conferen ce. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540) , vol. 1, pp. 216–221, 2000. doi: 10.11...

  46. [54]

    Digital com munications over fading channels (mk Simon and ms Alouini; 2005) [book re view],

    Marvin K. Simon and Mohamed-Slim Alouini, “Digital com munications over fading channels (mk Simon and ms Alouini; 2005) [book re view],” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 3369– 3370, 2008

    2005

  47. [55]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products. New Y ork: Academic Press, 6th ed, 2000

    2000

  48. [56]

    A Chernoff-type lower bound for the Gaussian Q-function,

    F. D. Cˆ ot´ e, I. N. Psaromiligkos, and W. J. Gross, “A Chernoff-type lower bound for the Gaussian Q-function,” arXiv preprint , arXiv:1202.6483, Mar. 2012

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.