Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Density modulations in active colloidal systems through orthogonal propulsion control and sensory delays

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A finite sensory delay in photoconductive Janus particles lets them over-accumulate in dark regions of a light pattern, beyond the standard instantaneous-response limit.

desk verdict Clean experimental demonstration of delay-enhanced localization in photoconductive Janus colloids; quantitative design rules need simulation clarification. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15396 v1 pith:Y3CSZSME submitted 2025-05-21 cond-mat.soft

Ueli Töpfer , Maximilian R. Bailey , Sanjay Schreiber , Federico Paratore , Lucio Isa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords Janusparticlesinduced-chargeelectrophoresisphotoconductivitysensorydelaydensitylocalizationactivecolloidsmotilitycontrollightpatterning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Silica–titania Janus particles that swim by induced-charge electrophoresis in an AC field adjust their speed when UV light changes the conductivity of their titania caps. The paper's central claim is that the finite time this adjustment takes—about two seconds for slowing down—is a control handle: in checkerboard light patterns with feature sizes of 40 µm and larger, it produces steady-state densities in the dark regions that exceed the standard prediction $\rho_L v_L = \rho_H v_H$. The claim is supported by particle trajectories, density counts, and a Langevin simulation in which particles switch between two speeds at a rate $1/\tau$. The result is a design rule: the best delay satisfies $v_H \tau^* \approx 0.41L$, with the proportionality set by the average ballistic crossing length of the pattern. If correct, material-intrinsic sensory delay gives synthetic swimmers a biological-style adaptive response without external feedback.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the photoconductive titania cap on a Janus particle, whose UV-regulated conductivity changes propulsion speed independently of the AC field that drives ICEP; the sensory delay $\tau$ is the characteristic time of that speed change. The paper treats the delay with a two-state velocity switch ($v_L \leftrightarrow v_H$ at a rate proportional to $1/\tau$), anchored to the measured exponential relaxation, and a geometric identity: the average ballistic path across a square of side $L$ is $L_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx 0.82L$, so optimal penetration is $v_H \tau^* \approx 0.5 L_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx 0.41L$. The baseline it beats is the exact non-interacting result $\rho_L v_L = \rho_H v_H$, which assumes instantaneous response. A measured asymmetry—slowing takes about 2 s, acceleration is nearly instantaneous—is reported, while the simulations use a single relaxation rate from Section IV D.

What would settle it

Measure $\rho_L/\rho_H$ versus pattern size across $L = 20$–$100\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ for at least two deliberately different delay times (for example, caps with different charge-carrier lifetimes) and check whether the peak position follows $v_H \tau^* \approx 0.41L$; if the peak does not shift with $\tau$ and $L$ in this way, the over-localization is not governed by the claimed ballistic-penetration balance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that a photoconductive cap with a seconds-long response time changes where active colloids accumulate. Measured against the steady-state rule $\rho_L v_L = \rho_H v_H$, which holds for instantaneously adapting swimmers, the particles over-localize in the low-activity (dark) squares of a checkerboard once the pattern size $L$ reaches about 40 µm. The localization ratio $\rho_L/\rho_H$ rises with the sensory delay $\tau$, passes through a maximum, and then falls again; the optimal delay scales with pattern size as $v_H \tau^* \approx 0.41(L - L_{\tau^*=0})$, matching a geometric estimate based on the average trajectory length $L_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx 0.82L$ through a square. The paper argues the mechanism is ballistic penetration: a fast particle crossing into a dark region keeps its high speed for a time $\tau$, travels deeper than an instantly adapting swimmer would, and therefore spends longer escaping at the low speed. This turns the charge-carrier lifetime of the titania cap into a physical parameter for density patterning.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative design rules from the simulations hold only if a single relaxation rate describes both speeding up and slowing down; in the measured response, slowing takes about two seconds while acceleration is nearly instantaneous, so a two-rate model could shift the predicted optimal delays and density ratios.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For pattern sizes $L \geq 40\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, choosing a material with the right delay gives a density contrast in dark regions beyond what the instantaneous inverse-velocity law allows.
  • The measured relation $v_H \tau^* \approx 0.41L$ gives a concrete target: engineers can tune the cap's charge-carrier lifetime to match a desired feature size.
  • For small patterns ($L \approx 20\,\mu\mathrm{m}$) or very short delays, the familiar $\rho \propto 1/v$ behavior is recovered, so the new effect appears only above a threshold set by the persistence length in the slow region.
  • Because speed control is orthogonal to propulsion, the same swimming mechanism can be used at different speeds without changing the electric field, simplifying pattern design.
  • The mapping of $(\rho_L/\rho_H)_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $\tau_{1/2}$ over $v_H$ and $L$ yields practical contrast-versus-resolution trade-offs for writing colloidal patterns.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The measured asymmetry (fast acceleration, ~2 s deceleration) suggests that reversing the polarity of a moving pattern, or modulating uniform light in time, should produce direction-dependent density responses; the paper's symmetric two-state model likely underestimates such effects.
  • The same material-intrinsic delay idea should transfer to other stimuli with slow material responses, such as pH, temperature, or chemical concentration, where the relaxation time of the transducer replaces external feedback.
  • A direct test of the ballistic-penetration mechanism would be to compare localization for square versus stripe patterns of equal area, since the average crossing length differs and the optimal delay should shift accordingly.
  • If charge-carrier lifetime can be shortened or lengthened independently (for example, by hole scavengers or surface treatments), the design rule maps directly onto a material-selection procedure, effectively making sensory delay a tunable material property.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental system of silica-titania Janus microswimmers driven by induced-charge electrophoresis in AC electric fields, with propulsion speed controlled orthogonally by UV illumination through the photoconductivity of the titania cap. The authors characterize the velocity response to illumination steps and find a strongly asymmetric sensory delay: deceleration from high to low velocity takes about 2 s, while acceleration is nearly instantaneous. In checkerboard illumination patterns, they observe enhanced localization of particles in low-activity regions beyond the standard steady-state relation ρ_L v_L = ρ_H v_H, and they attribute this enhancement to the finite sensory delay. Using Brownian dynamics simulations with parameters extracted from experiments, they reproduce the qualitative trajectories and the trend in localization, and they derive a scaling law for the optimal delay, v_H τ* ≈ 0.41 L, from a geometric argument. They also provide design maps for maximum localization contrast and for the delay tolerance as functions of pattern size and velocity ratio. The central conceptual claim is that material-intrinsic sensory delay, unlike the effectively instantaneous response assumed in most synthetic active colloids, is a useful and tunable control parameter for density patterning.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, this is a significant advance in active-matter control: it demonstrates a synthetic colloid whose propulsion speed is regulated by a material property (photoconductivity) orthogonal to the driving field, and it identifies sensory delay as a practical knob for density patterning, with explicit design rules. The experimental characterization of the asymmetric delay is clean and well documented, and the simulations use measured velocities and delay as inputs rather than fitting the localization data, so the over-localization is an emergent model prediction. The geometric scaling argument is transparent and matches the simulation slope closely. The paper also provides falsifiable design maps (Fig. 5c,d) that could guide material selection for other swimmers. However, the quantitative claims rest on a simulation model whose switching kinetics are not aligned with the measured asymmetric response, and the experimental localization data lack error bars; these weaknesses currently prevent a full quantitative assessment of the central claim of enhanced localization and of the specific design rules.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV D, Eq. (4)-(5), Fig. 2b] The simulation model is described as switching between the low and high velocities 'at a rate proportional to 1/τ', i.e., with a single characteristic response time. The measured response in Fig. 2b is strongly asymmetric: deceleration from high to low activity is exponential with τ ≈ 2 s, while acceleration from low to high activity is essentially instantaneous (below the 300 ms exposure time). A symmetric two-state model delays both transitions, so particles entering an illuminated region remain slow for an average time τ, which reduces the density ratio ρ_L/ρ_H and shifts the optimal delay relative to a model with one-sided delay. The Methods do not state whether different rates are used for the two transitions, and the quantitative results in Figs. 4 and 5 are produced by this model. The authors should implement the measured asymmetric kinetics in the simulations and show whether the localization ratios and the fitted slope in Fig. 5b are preserved, or justify explicitly why a symmetric model captures the relevant physics despite the measured asymmetry.
  2. [Fig. 4] The experimental localization ratios ρ_L/ρ_H in Fig. 4 are shown as single square markers with no error bars, no confidence intervals, and no stated number of particles or frames used for the steady-state average. Because the central quantitative claim is that experiments exceed the instantaneous-response prediction ρ_L v_L = ρ_H v_H for larger patterns, the absence of statistical information makes it impossible to assess the strength of the agreement with the simulations, which is a load-bearing element of the paper. The authors should provide error bars (e.g., standard error over independent measurements or temporal block averages), state the number of particles tracked and the equilibration time, and clarify how the steady state was determined.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II C, Fig. 5b] The geometric scaling argument is presented as a justification for the fitted slope 0.39 in Fig. 5b, but the derivation assumes purely ballistic motion and neglects rotational diffusion and translational noise, while the simulations include these effects. The paper does state that τ < 1/D_R in the investigated regime, which supports the ballistic approximation, but it would be helpful to state this explicitly in the derivation and to note that the geometric estimate is an approximation, so the close agreement with the fit is not by construction.
  2. [Supplementary S3, Eq. (7)] Equation (7) in the supplementary information appears to contain a typographical error: the integrand is written as sqrt((x−y)^2 + L + 2 sqrt(x^2 + y^2)), whereas the intended expression is presumably sqrt((x−y)^2 + L^2) + 2 sqrt(x^2 + y^2). Please correct this.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] In the caption of Fig. 5b, the phrase 'the hatched area are shows where' should be corrected to 'the hatched area shows where'.
  4. [Section II C] The threshold pattern size for which finite delay enhances localization is defined through the persistence length in the slow region, v_L τ_R, with τ_R = 1/D_R. Since the paper earlier defines the persistence length as L_p = v/D_R, the notation τ_R could be confused with response time; consider writing it as v_L/D_R for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental over-localization and the scaling v_H tau* ≈ 0.41 L are independent of the model inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental observation: the measured finite sensory delay (Fig. 2, Eq. 1) produces steady-state density ratios rho_L/rho_H that exceed the instantaneous benchmark rho_L v_L = rho_H v_H for checkerboard patterns L >= 40 µm (Fig. 4). The benchmark is an external result from [16-18], not an input to the experiments. The simulations in Figs. 3-5 use independently measured v_L, v_H, tau, D_R, D_T as inputs and the enhanced localization emerges from the Langevin dynamics; the localization ratio is not a fitted parameter and the simulations are compared with, not used to define, the experimental data. The optimal-delay scaling is derived geometrically in Supplementary S3 (L_eff ≈ 0.82L, so v_H tau* ≈ 0.5 L_eff ≈ 0.41L) before being compared with the simulation slope of 0.39, so it is a prediction rather than a post-hoc fit. The only self-citation is ref. [55] for the simulation framework; it is a previously published model with explicit equations (Eqs. 4-6) and its predictions are tested against the present experiments, so it does not function as a circular justification. The possible quantitative mismatch caused by using one symmetric switching rate despite the measured asymmetric response (Fig. 2b) is a modeling-accuracy concern, not a circularity: no quantity in the derivation is defined in terms of the claimed output.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The two free parameters are measured kinetic properties used as simulation inputs. The main assumptions are the standard density-speed relation used as a benchmark, the two-state switching model for velocity relaxation, the TiO2 trapped-charge mechanism for the delay, and the geometric trajectory average L_eff ≈ 0.82L.

free parameters (2)
  • sensory delay time τ = ≈ 2 s (slow-down)
    Extracted from exponential fits to the ensemble-averaged velocity decay when UV is switched off (eq 1, Fig 2b). It is a measured material response, but it is the key input to the simulations and the design rules; its value is not derived from theory.
  • swimming velocities v_L and v_H = v_L < 1 µm/s, v_H up to > 8 µm/s (system-dependent)
    Obtained by fitting ensemble-averaged MSDs with the active Brownian particle model (eq 3) under global uniform illumination. They set the instantaneous baseline ρ_L v_L = ρ_H v_H and are used as simulation inputs.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Steady-state density of non-interacting swimmers with position-dependent, instantaneously adapting speed satisfies ρ(r) ∝ 1/v(r).
    Invoked in Section II C as the baseline for localization (refs 16-18). It is a standard result, but the paper's whole point is that it breaks down under finite delay, so it serves as the benchmark.
  • domain assumption The velocity relaxation of each simulated particle is a two-state switch with rate proportional to 1/τ (Section IV D, following the RABP model of ref 55).
    The simulation results (Figs 3-5) depend on this model. Whether it captures the experimentally measured asymmetric response (instant acceleration, ~2 s deceleration) is not stated, making this a load-bearing modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption Charge-carrier lifetimes in hydrated TiO2 of seconds to minutes explain the measured delay (refs 51,52).
    The paper attributes the delay to trapped-electron/hole stabilization by adsorbed water, but does not directly measure carrier dynamics in the 50 nm cap. The mechanism is plausible but unverified.
  • standard math L_eff ≈ 0.82L for trajectories through a square of side L (Supp. S3, eq 7).
    The scaling law v_H τ* ≈ 0.41 L relies on this geometric average; the calculation assumes straight trajectories crossing a square, which is an idealization of actual noisy paths.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Density modulations in active colloidal systems through orthogonal propulsion control and sensory delays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y3CSZSME

@misc{pith2026250515396,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Density modulations in active colloidal systems through orthogonal propulsion control and sensory delays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y3CSZSME}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15396}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in active colloidal systems aim to mimic key characteristics of biological microswimmers, particularly their adaptive motility in response to environmental changes. While many approaches rely on externally imposing a propulsive force, achieving true autonomous and self-regulating adaptation to the environment remains limited. In this study, we develop and analyze Janus microswimmers driven by electrohydrodynamic flows that autonomously adjust their propulsion dynamics in response to varying illumination conditions. Our Janus particles are silica colloids partially coated with titania, which self-propel via induced-charge electrophoresis (ICEP) under uniform AC electric fields. Since titania is photoconductive, it increases its conductivity under UV illumination, which thereby regulates the propulsion velocity independently of and orthogonally to the applied electric field. Crucially, the velocity adaptation requires a finite time. This sensory delay, which we systematically characterize, leads to enhanced microswimmer localization in response to spatiotemporal light modulations compared to the typical case of instantaneous response considered for synthetic microswimmers. By harnessing these dynamics, akin to those of biological microswimmers, we exert precise control over both local and global particle behavior, presenting novel opportunities for adaptive active matter systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15396 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gigantic dynamical spreading and anomalous diffusion of jerky active particles

    cond-mat.soft 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A linear third-order 'jerk' equation driven by active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise yields mean-square displacement scaling with time exponents 6, 5, 4, or 3, and can destabilize harmonic confinement.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bhattacharjee, D

    T. Bhattacharjee, D. B. Amchin, J. A. Ott, F. Kratz, and S. S. Datta, Chemotactic migration of bacteria in porous media, Biophysical Journal120, 3483–3497 (2021). 17

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    G. H. Wadhams and J. P. Armitage, Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology5, 1024–1037 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    C. T. Lef` evre, M. Bennet, L. Landau, P. Vach, D. Pignol, D. A. Bazylinski, R. B. Frankel, S. Klumpp, and D. Faivre, Diversity of magneto-aerotactic behaviors and oxygen sensing mechanisms in cultured magnetotactic bacteria, Biophysical Journal107, 527–538 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    R. B. Frankel and D. A. Bazylinski, Magnetosomes and magneto-aerotaxis, inBacterial Sens- ing and Signaling(KARGER, 2009) p. 182–193

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Garcia, S

    X. Garcia, S. Rafa ¨ ı, and P. Peyla, Light control of the flow of phototactic microswimmer suspensions, Physical Review Letters110, 10.1103/physrevlett.110.138106 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.138106 2013

  6. [6]

    Di Leonardo, A

    R. Di Leonardo, A. B´ uz´ as, L. Kelemen, D. T´ oth, S. T´ oth, P. Ormos, and G. Vizsnyiczai, Boundary shape engineering for the spatial control of confined active particles (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Palacci, S

    J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science339, 936–940 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Aubret, Q

    A. Aubret, Q. Martinet, and J. Palacci, Metamachines of pluripotent colloids, Nature Com- munications12, 10.1038/s41467-021-26699-6 (2021)

    doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26699-6 2021

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    F. Ma, S. Wang, D. T. Wu, and N. Wu, Electric-field–induced assembly and propulsion of chiral colloidal clusters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 6307–6312 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Bricard, J.-B

    A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of macro- scopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids, Nature503, 95–98 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    R. C. L¨ offler, E. Panizon, and C. Bechinger, Collective foraging of active particles trained by reinforcement learning, Scientific Reports13, 10.1038/s41598-023-44268-3 (2023)

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Heuthe, E

    V.-L. Heuthe, E. Panizon, H. Gu, and C. Bechinger, Counterfactual rewards promote collective transport using individually controlled swarm microrobots, Science Robotics9, 10.1126/scirobotics.ado5888 (2024)

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    J. Yan, M. Han, J. Zhang, C. Xu, E. Luijten, and S. Granick, Reconfiguring active particles by electrostatic imbalance, Nature Materials15, 1095–1099 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 219–244 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Geyer, D

    D. Geyer, D. Martin, J. Tailleur, and D. Bartolo, Freezing a flock: Motility-induced phase separation in polar active liquids, Physical Review X9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.031043 (2019). 18

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    M. J. Schnitzer, Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis, Physical Review E48, 2553–2568 (1993)

    1993

  9. [17]

    Stenhammar, R

    J. Stenhammar, R. Wittkowski, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Light-induced self-assembly of active rectification devices, Science Advances2, 10.1126/sciadv.1501850 (2016)

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Tailleur and M

    J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria, Physical Review Letters100, 10.1103/physrevlett.100.218103 (2008)

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    F. A. Lavergne, H. Wendehenne, T. B¨ auerle, and C. Bechinger, Group formation and cohesion of active particles with visual perception–dependent motility, Science364, 70–74 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Zehavi, D

    M. Zehavi, D. Sofer, T. Miloh, O. D. Velev, and G. Yossifon, Optically modulated propul- sion of electric-field-powered photoconducting janus particles, Physical Review Applied18, 10.1103/physrevapplied.18.024060 (2022)

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    J. R. Gomez-Solano, S. Samin, C. Lozano, P. Ruedas-Batuecas, R. van Roij, and C. Bechinger, Tuning the motility and directionality of self-propelled colloids, Scientific Reports7, 10.1038/s41598-017-14126-0 (2017)

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    M. A. Fernandez-Rodriguez, F. Grillo, L. Alvarez, M. Rathlef, I. Buttinoni, G. Volpe, and L. Isa, Feedback-controlled active brownian colloids with space-dependent rotational dynam- ics, Nature Communications11, 10.1038/s41467-020-17864-4 (2020)

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    J. Arlt, V. A. Martinez, A. Dawson, T. Pilizota, and W. C. K. Poon, Painting with light- powered bacteria, Nature Communications9, 10.1038/s41467-018-03161-8 (2018)

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Frangipane, D

    G. Frangipane, D. Dell’Arciprete, S. Petracchini, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, G. Vizs- nyiczai, M. L. Bernardini, and R. Di Leonardo, Dynamic density shaping of photokinetic e. coli, eLife7, 10.7554/elife.36608 (2018)

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Mijalkov, A

    M. Mijalkov, A. McDaniel, J. Wehr, and G. Volpe, Engineering sensorial delay to control pho- totaxis and emergent collective behaviors, Physical Review X6, 10.1103/physrevx.6.011008 (2016)

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Leyman, F

    M. Leyman, F. Ogemark, J. Wehr, and G. Volpe, Tuning phototactic robots with sensorial delays, Physical Review E98, 10.1103/physreve.98.052606 (2018)

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    J. M. Walter, D. Greenfield, C. Bustamante, and J. Liphardt, Light-powering escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104, 2408–2412 (2007). 19

    2007

  20. [29]

    B. Qian, D. Montiel, A. Bregulla, F. Cichos, and H. Yang, Harnessing thermal fluctuations for purposeful activities: the manipulation of single micro-swimmers by adaptive photon nudging, Chemical Science4, 1420 (2013)

    2013

  21. [30]

    Lozano, B

    C. Lozano, B. ten Hagen, H. L¨ owen, and C. Bechinger, Phototaxis of synthetic microswimmers in optical landscapes, Nature Communications7, 10.1038/ncomms12828 (2016)

    2016 doi

  22. [31]

    Dietrich, N

    K. Dietrich, N. Jaensson, I. Buttinoni, G. Volpe, and L. Isa, Microscale marangoni surfers, Physical Review Letters125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.098001 (2020)

    2020 doi

  23. [32]

    D. P. Singh, W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, L. G. Wilson, and P. Fischer, Photogravitactic microswimmers, Advanced Functional Materials28, 10.1002/adfm.201706660 (2018)

    2018 doi

  24. [33]

    L. Wang, M. N. Popescu, F. Stavale, A. Ali, T. Gemming, and J. Simmchen, Cu@tio2 janus microswimmers with a versatile motion mechanism, Soft Matter14, 6969–6973 (2018)

    2018

  25. [34]

    M. R. Bailey, F. Grillo, N. D. Spencer, and L. Isa, Microswimmers from toposelective nanopar- ticle attachment, Advanced Functional Materials32, 10.1002/adfm.202109175 (2021)

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    Zhang, G

    X. Zhang, G. Si, Y. Dong, K. Chen, Q. Ouyang, C. Luo, and Y. Tu, Escape band in escherichia coli chemotaxis in opposing attractant and nutrient gradients, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 2253–2258 (2019)

    2019

  27. [36]

    Sourjik and H

    V. Sourjik and H. C. Berg, Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences99, 123–127 (2001)

    2001

  28. [37]

    Giometto, F

    A. Giometto, F. Altermatt, A. Maritan, R. Stocker, and A. Rinaldo, Generalized receptor law governs phototaxis in the phytoplankton euglena gracilis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 7045–7050 (2015)

    2015

  29. [38]

    Ohiri, C

    U. Ohiri, C. W. Shields, K. Han, T. Tyler, O. D. Velev, and N. Jokerst, Reconfigurable engineered motile semiconductor microparticles, Nature Communications9, 10.1038/s41467- 018-04183-y (2018)

    2018 doi

  30. [39]

    Dou and K

    Y. Dou and K. J. M. Bishop, Autonomous navigation of shape-shifting microswimmers, Phys- ical Review Research1, 10.1103/physrevresearch.1.032030 (2019)

    2019 doi

  31. [40]

    R. A. Archer, J. R. Howse, S. Fujii, H. Kawashima, G. A. Buxton, and S. J. Ebbens, ph- responsive catalytic janus motors with autonomous navigation and cargo-release functions, 20 Advanced Functional Materials30, 10.1002/adfm.202000324 (2020)

    2020 doi

  32. [41]

    van Kesteren, L

    S. van Kesteren, L. Alvarez, S. Arrese-Igor, A. Alegria, and L. Isa, Self-propelling col- loids with finite state dynamics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, 10.1073/pnas.2213481120 (2023)

    2023 doi

  33. [42]

    M.Boymelgreen, G

    A. M.Boymelgreen, G. Kunti, P. Garcia-Sanchez, A. Ramos, G. Yossifon, and T. Miloh, The role of particle-electrode wall interactions in mobility of active janus particles driven by electric fields, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science616, 465–475 (2022)

    2022

  34. [43]

    T. M. SQUIRES and M. Z. BAZANT, Breaking symmetries in induced-charge electro-osmosis and electrophoresis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics560, 65–101 (2006)

    2006

  35. [44]

    A. M. Boymelgreen and T. Miloh, Alternating current induced-charge electrophoresis of leaky dielectric janus particles, Physics of Fluids24, 10.1063/1.4739932 (2012)

    2012 doi

  36. [45]

    Luttrell, S

    T. Luttrell, S. Halpegamage, J. Tao, A. Kramer, E. Sutter, and M. Batzill, Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? - model studies on epitaxial tio2 films, Scientific Reports4, 10.1038/srep04043 (2014)

    2014 doi

  37. [46]

    Brajsa, K

    A. Brajsa, K. Szaniawska, R. Barczy´ nski, L. Murawski, B. Ko´ scielska, A. Vomvas, and K. Pomoni, The photoconductivity of sol–gel derived tio2 films, Optical Materials26, 151 (2004), proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sol–Gel Materials. Research, Technolog...

    2004

  38. [47]

    T. M. SQUIRES and M. Z. BAZANT, Induced-charge electro-osmosis, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics509, 217–252 (2004)

    2004

  39. [48]

    C. Chen, F. Mou, L. Xu, S. Wang, J. Guan, Z. Feng, Q. Wang, L. Kong, W. Li, J. Wang, and Q. Zhang, Light-steered isotropic semiconductor micromotors, Advanced Materials29, 10.1002/adma.201603374 (2016)

    2016 doi

  40. [49]

    Aubret, M

    A. Aubret, M. Youssef, S. Sacanna, and J. Palacci, Targeted assembly and synchronization of self-spinning microgears, Nature Physics14, 1114–1118 (2018)

    2018

  41. [50]

    R. Dong, C. Wang, Q. Wang, A. Pei, X. She, Y. Zhang, and Y. Cai, Zno-based microrockets with light-enhanced propulsion, Nanoscale9, 15027–15032 (2017)

    2017

  42. [51]

    Litke, E

    A. Litke, E. J. M. Hensen, and J. P. Hofmann, Role of dissociatively adsorbed water on the formation of shallow trapped electrons in tio2 photocatalysts, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C121, 10153–10162 (2017). 21

    2017

  43. [52]

    Litke, Y

    A. Litke, Y. Su, I. Tranca, T. Weber, E. J. M. Hensen, and J. P. Hofmann, Role of adsorbed water on charge carrier dynamics in photoexcited tio2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, 7514–7524 (2017)

    2017

  44. [53]

    Caprini, U

    L. Caprini, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, R. Wittmann, and H. L¨ owen, Dynamics of active particles with space-dependent swim velocity, Soft Matter18, 1412–1422 (2022)

    2022

  45. [54]

    N. A. S¨ oker, S. Auschra, V. Holubec, K. Kroy, and F. Cichos, How activity landscapes po- larize microswimmers without alignment forces, Physical Review Letters126, 10.1103/phys- revlett.126.228001 (2021)

    2021 doi

  46. [55]

    M. R. Bailey, F. Grillo, and L. Isa, Simulation and time series analysis of responsive active brownian particles (rabps) with memory, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 505102 (2024)

    2024

  47. [56]

    H. C. Berg, Chemotaxis in bacteria, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering4, 119 (1975)

    1975

  48. [57]

    Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria, Annual review of biochemistry44, 341 (1975)

    J. Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria, Annual review of biochemistry44, 341 (1975)

    1975

  49. [58]

    Autrum, M

    H. Autrum, M. F. Bennett, B. Diehn, K. Hamdorf, M. Heisenberg, M. J¨ arvilehto, P. Kunze, R. Menzel, W. H. Miller, A. W. Snyder, D. G. Stavenga, and M. Yoshida,Comparative Phys- iology and Evolution of Vision in Invertebrates: A: Invertebrate Photoreceptors, edited by H. Autru...

    1979

  50. [59]

    J´ ekely, J

    G. J´ ekely, J. Colombelli, H. Hausen, K. Guy, E. Stelzer, F. N´ ed´ elec, and D. Arendt, Mechanism of phototaxis in marine zooplankton, Nature456, 395–399 (2008)

    2008

  51. [60]

    Marcos, H. C. Fu, T. R. Powers, and R. Stocker, Bacterial rheotaxis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 4780–4785 (2012)

    2012

  52. [61]

    H. R. Vutukuri, M. Lisicki, E. Lauga, and J. Vermant, Light-switchable propulsion of active particles with reversible interactions, Nature Communications11, 10.1038/s41467-020-15764- 1 (2020)

    2020 doi

  53. [62]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Li, C. Tian, and Y. Wang, Active colloidal molecules assembled via selec- tive and directional bonds, Nature Communications11, 10.1038/s41467-020-16506-z (2020)

    2020 doi

  54. [63]

    Cichos, K

    F. Cichos, K. Gustavsson, B. Mehlig, and G. Volpe, Machine learning for active matter, Nature Machine Intelligence2, 94–103 (2020)

    2020

  55. [64]

    Vizsnyiczai, G

    G. Vizsnyiczai, G. Frangipane, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, and R. Di Leonardo, Light controlled 3d micromotors powered by bacteria, Nature Communications8, 22 10.1038/ncomms15974 (2017)

    2017 doi

  56. [65]

    Pellicciotta, O

    N. Pellicciotta, O. S. Bagal, V. C. Sosa, G. Frangipane, G. Vizsnyiczai, and R. D. Leonardo, Light controlled biohybrid microbots, Advanced Functional Materials33, 10.1002/adfm.202214801 (2023)

    2023 doi

  57. [66]

    Putzke and H

    M. Putzke and H. Stark, Optimal navigation of a smart active particle: directional and dis- tance sensing, The European Physical Journal E46, 10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00309-3 (2023)

    2023 doi

  58. [67]

    Moreno-G´ amez, M

    S. Moreno-G´ amez, M. E. Hochberg, and G. S. van Doorn, Quorum sensing as a mechanism to harness the wisdom of the crowds, Nature Communications14, 10.1038/s41467-023-37950-7 (2023)

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    Massana-Cid, C

    H. Massana-Cid, C. Maggi, G. Frangipane, and R. Di Leonardo, Rectification and con- finement of photokinetic bacteria in an optical feedback loop, Nature Communications13, 10.1038/s41467-022-30201-1 (2022)

    2022 doi

  60. [69]

    H. H. Mohamed, R. Dillert, and D. W. Bahnemann, Reaction dynamics of the transfer of stored electrons on tio2 nanoparticles: A stopped flow study, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry217, 271–274 (2011)

    2011

  61. [70]

    Heinen, T

    L. Heinen, T. Heuser, A. Steinschulte, and A. Walther, Antagonistic enzymes in a biocatalytic ph feedback system program autonomous dna hydrogel life cycles, Nano Letters17, 4989–4995 (2017)

    2017

  62. [71]

    C. Lanz, N. K¨ unnecke, Y. Krysiak, and S. Polarz, Accelerating and breaking adaptive nano-colloids (100 nm) into unsteady state operation via push–pull effects, Nanoscale16, 15358–15365 (2024)

    2024

  63. [72]

    Yoshida and H

    K. Yoshida and H. Onoe, Soft spiral-shaped microswimmers for autonomous swim- ming control by detecting surrounding environments, Advanced Intelligent Systems2, 10.1002/aisy.202000095 (2020)

    2020 doi

  64. [73]

    Collins, A

    S. Collins, A. Ruina, R. Tedrake, and M. Wisse, Efficient bipedal robots based on passive- dynamic walkers, Science307, 1082–1085 (2005)

    2005

  65. [74]

    J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self- motile colloidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk, Physical Review Letters 99, 10.1103/physrevlett.99.048102 (2007)

    2007 doi

  66. [75]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active par- ticles in complex and crowded environments, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 10.1103/revmod- 23 phys.88.045006 (2016). 24 S1: P AR TICLE VELOCITY AS A FUNCTION OF THE ELECTRIC FIELD 1 2 3 ...

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.