Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 42 references

Fast and robust detection of single Rydberg excitations in mesoscopic ensembles

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single Rydberg excitation in a mesoscopic ensemble can be detected by making it switch on optical pumping in an Autler-Townes configuration, with projected infidelity below 1% for 100 atoms within 15 microseconds.

desk verdict Solid new detection scheme with a plausible mechanism and detailed modeling; the main caveats are the unquantified sample-sample interactions and the qualitative EIT comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15473 v1 pith:2W2P2XAC submitted 2025-05-21 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Sven Schmidt , Aaron Thielmann , Thomas Niederprüm , Herwig Ott This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph PACS 32.80.Ee42.50.Gy03.67.-a
keywords RydbergatomsAutler-TownessplittingmesoscopicensemblesopticalpumpingstatedetectionquantumsimulationFörsterresonancetweezers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a fast, non-destructive method to detect a single Rydberg excitation in a mesoscopic atomic ensemble. The trick is to let the excitation act as a switch: when no Rydberg atom is present, a strong coupling laser splits the probe transition and suppresses optical pumping; when a Rydberg excitation is present, its interactions shift an auxiliary Rydberg level, restoring pumping and transferring the ensemble to a second ground state that is read out. The paper argues this Autler-Townes imaging protocol delivers high fidelity on microsecond timescales, is robust against probe-laser frequency changes, and outperforms EIT-based detection with far smaller ensembles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Autler-Townes doublet of the probe transition, formed by a strong coupling laser that splits the intermediate state into two eigenstates separated by the coupling Rabi frequency. When a control Rydberg excitation sits nearby, the Rydberg-Rydberg interaction $V_{RyRy}$ detunes the auxiliary Rydberg state, reducing the effective probe detuning on one eigenstate and activating optical pumping. The quantitative machinery is the Hamiltonian $\hat{H}_{\mathrm{ATI}} = \hat{H}_{RyRy}(R) + \hat{H}_{\mathrm{Rabi}} + \hat{H}_{\mathrm{HFS}}$, diagonalized for one control and one sample atom, with the weak probe treated perturbatively to compute a scattering rate and a transfer probability averaged over the internuclear distance distribution.

What would settle it

Run the protocol with the paper's rubidium parameters (coupling Rabi frequency $2\pi \times 31 \, \mathrm{MHz}$, probe pulse $15 \, \mu\mathrm{s}$, about 100 atoms at $50 \, \mu\mathrm{K}$) and compare photon-count histograms with and without a control Rydberg excitation: an infidelity above $10^{-2}$, or a transfer-ratio spectrum that is not strongly asymmetric with a broad negative-detuning wing, would invalidate the predicted Autler-Townes switch mechanism and the two-particle model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an Autler-Townes based detection protocol in which the presence of a single Rydberg excitation (the control atom) controls the optical pumping of a mesoscopic sample from one hyperfine ground state to another. With no excitation, the coupling laser on the upper transition splits the intermediate state, leaving the probe far off resonance and the sample untouched. With an excitation, dipole-dipole or van der Waals interactions shift the auxiliary Rydberg state, break the Autler-Townes condition, and restore resonant probe scattering, transferring atoms to the lower ground state. A realistic multi-level simulation for rubidium, using Förster-enhanced Rydberg interactions and a two-particle Hamiltonian, predicts transfer probabilities of up to about 50% and detection infidelities below $10^{-2}$ for 100-atom samples on a 15-microsecond timescale.

Load-bearing premise

The fidelity predictions assume that a single control atom paired with one representative sample atom captures all relevant physics, because multi-particle effects in the sample beyond the Rydberg blockade are neglected and each atom's transfer is treated independently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single Rydberg excitation can be mapped onto the ground-state population of a mesoscopic ensemble within a few microseconds and stored there for later readout, enabling fast non-destructive detection in quantum simulation and information processing.
  • The protocol works with standard fluorescence imaging at roughly ten detected photons per atom, so it avoids the need for single-photon-sensitive detectors.
  • The scheme is applicable to any atomic species with two stable hyperfine ground states and can be extended to multi-species systems because dipole-dipole interactions are not limited to a single species.
  • Increasing the principal quantum number of the Rydberg states increases the interaction radius, which should improve fidelity and could allow spatial separation of control and sample atoms.
  • Compared with EIT-based imaging, the ATI method reaches similar timescales with better fidelity at sample sizes above ten atoms, requiring far smaller ensembles (about 10 versus 400 atoms) for comparable performance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: The distance dependence of the transfer probability might be used to extract spatial information about the Rydberg excitation, not just its presence, by analyzing the total ensemble signal.
  • Editorial: The predicted broadening toward negative probe detunings implies the scheme tolerates residual light shifts and laser-frequency drifts, which could relax stabilization requirements in experimental implementations.
  • Editorial: Because the signal is stored in a long-lived ground-state population of many atoms, the protocol could serve as a quantum memory that decouples Rydberg detection from the fragile Rydberg coherence and may allow repeated or time-multiplexed measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-destructive detection scheme for single Rydberg excitations in mesoscopic ensembles, based on optical pumping in Autler-Townes configuration. The presence of a control Rydberg atom shifts the auxiliary Rydberg state, breaking the Autler-Townes resonance and activating a probe-induced transfer of sample atoms into a second ground state. The authors construct a detailed multi-level Hamiltonian for a control-sample pair, compute scattering rates from its eigenstates, and derive transfer probabilities and detection fidelities for rubidium parameters. They report infidelities below 10^-2 for 100 atoms at a 15 microsecond probe time and claim superiority over EIT-based detection for samples larger than 10 atoms.

Significance. If the fidelity estimates are reliable, the protocol offers a fast, robust, and technically simple method for single Rydberg excitation readout, which is relevant for quantum simulation and information processing with mesoscopic ensembles. The paper's strengths include a realistic multi-level treatment (hyperfine structure, Rydberg manifolds, and a Förster resonance), explicit modeling of control-atom decay and photon statistics in the fidelity estimate, and the demonstration of robustness against probe-laser detuning. The main limitation is the two-particle truncation, which the authors explicitly acknowledge; the open question is whether the neglected sample-sample interactions quantitatively affect the central fidelity claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (6)-(7) and Eq. (48)] The two-particle truncation neglects sample-sample Rydberg interactions, and this may affect the central fidelity claims. Two sample atoms can be simultaneously in the auxiliary Rydberg state with small probability, and their mutual interaction could break the Autler-Townes condition even in the absence of the control atom, creating a false-positive transfer channel. With N_at=100 and (Omega_p/Omega_c)^2 ~ 1e-3, the expected number of such pairs is at the 1e-2 level, comparable to the claimed infidelity of 1e-2. The authors should either provide a quantitative estimate of this effect (including the suppression due to Rydberg blockade) or modify the model to include it, since Eq. (48) assumes independent Poissonian transfer of each sample atom and thereby inherits this approximation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section VI] There are several typos: 'novell' should be 'novel', and 'af sample atoms' should be 'of sample atoms'. Please proofread the Discussion and the Supplementary Information.
  2. [Supplementary Section III] In the sentence about the harmonic trap, 'the the trap' should read 'the trap'. Also, the abbreviation 'IDPD' is sometimes written as 'IPDP'; please standardize.
  3. [Supplementary Section I.B] In the discussion of the simplified two-level model, 'states states' should be 'states', and 'additional additional' should be 'additional'.
  4. [Section III, Eq. (14)] Please clarify whether Gamma in the scattering rate formula is the natural linewidth of the intermediate state or the total decay rate including any additional broadening, since this affects the numerical scattering rates.
  5. [Supplementary Section II] The assumption that eigenenergies and admixtures are constant for R <= 0.2 um is an ad-hoc cutoff. Although the internuclear distance probability density is small in this region, the transfer probability is maximal there; a brief justification or sensitivity estimate would strengthen the presentation.
  6. [General] The main text refers to 'Appendix 1' through 'Appendix 5', but the supplementary sections use Roman numerals (I-V). Aligning these references would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported fidelities are forward-model outputs, and the one self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities—the transfer probability P (Eq. 20), transfer ratio R = P/P_noRyd, and detection infidelities (Appendix V)—are produced by a forward calculation: the Hamiltonian H_ATI (Eq. 7) is diagonalized for fixed physical parameters, scattering rates are obtained from Eqs. (14)-(19), and photon/atom-number histograms are built with Poisson statistics. No fidelity target is fitted; the parameters in Table I are presented as typical experimental settings. The only fitted constants, C3 and C6 in Appendix I A, calibrate the simplified two-level cross-check against the same interaction diagonalization, but the full-model fidelities use direct diagonalization of the Rydberg-Rydberg Hamiltonian and do not take those fitted coefficients as inputs. Thus there is no fitted-input-called-prediction and no self-definitional reduction. The acknowledged approximation in Section III, 'we neglect multi-particle effects between the atoms in the sample, which go beyond the Rydberg blockade physics,' is a modeling limitation rather than a circular step, because the calculation does not assume the detection-fidelity conclusion. The citation [28] to prior work by two of the present authors is used only to motivate the multi-level treatment; the model itself is constructed from an external interaction formalism [39] and stated physical parameters, so that self-citation is not load-bearing. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained for a theoretical proposal, and no prediction reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the physical model and the chosen parameters. No new particles or forces are introduced. The main burden is the set of approximations and parameter choices, which are reasonable but not experimentally validated.

free parameters (9)
  • C3 = 3.8 MHz um^3
    Fitted to the Rydberg-Rydberg interaction diagonalization in the range R=3-5 um (Eq. 21).
  • C6 = 135.2 MHz um^6
    Fitted to the Rydberg-Rydberg interaction diagonalization in the range R=0.6-3 um (Eq. 21).
  • Coupling Rabi frequency Ωc = 2π x 31, 44, 54, 62, 76, 88, 98 MHz (scanned)
    Chosen to explore the trade-off between transfer probability and transfer ratio; optimal values selected for fidelity estimates.
  • Probe Rabi frequency Ωp = 2π x 1 MHz
    Chosen by hand to satisfy the weak-probe condition (Ωp small compared to Ωc, V_RyRy, V_HFS).
  • Probe pulse duration t_p = 15 us
    Set to half the black-body-limited lifetime of |39S1/2> (32.27 us at 300 K).
  • Mean detected photons per atom n̄_ph = 10
    Assumed for fluorescence imaging to account for light-assisted collision losses; conservative lower bound.
  • Background photon mean = 5
    Assumed noise level in the detection model.
  • Sample temperature T = 50 uK
    Typical after dark MOT loading; enters the internuclear distance probability density.
  • Tweezer waist and depth = w0=2 um, U0=1 mK
    Chosen as typical experimental parameters; determine the harmonic trapping frequencies and IDPD.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Standard optical Bloch equations describe the probe scattering rate (Eq. 14).
    Unproved background in quantum optics.
  • standard math The Rydberg-Rydberg interaction is dominated by dipolar coupling, as in Ref [39] (Eq. 27).
    Standard model for Rydberg interactions.
  • domain assumption The probe laser can be treated as a weak perturbation, separate from the strong-coupling diagonalization.
    Requires Ωp << Ωc, V_RyRy, V_HFS; the chosen Ωp=2π x 1 MHz is claimed to satisfy this.
  • domain assumption The basis truncation to Rydberg states with n={37,38,39}, l≤1 accounts for all relevant near-resonant states.
    Other states are assumed negligible due to energetic proximity.
  • domain assumption Multi-particle interactions among sample atoms beyond Rydberg blockade are negligible.
    Stated in Section III; allows reduction to a two-particle model.
  • domain assumption The sample is in thermal equilibrium in a harmonic trap at 50 uK, giving the IDPD of Eq. (43).
    Used to average the transfer probability over interatomic distances.
  • ad hoc to paper For R ≤ 0.2 um, eigenenergies and admixtures are constant and equal to those at R=0.2 um.
    Introduced to avoid complex avoided-crossing spectra at very short distances; mentioned only in the appendix.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast and robust detection of single Rydberg excitations in mesoscopic ensembles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2W2P2XAC

@misc{pith2026250515473,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast and robust detection of single Rydberg excitations in mesoscopic ensembles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2W2P2XAC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15473}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a novel non-destructive method for the detection of single Rydberg excitations in a mesoscopic ensemble. The protocol achieves high fidelities on a microsecond timescale and is robust against changes in the probe laser frequency. The technique relies on optical pumping in Autler Townes configuration, whose efficiency is controlled by the presence/absence of a Rydberg excitation. Taking rubidium atoms as an example, we give realistic estimates for the achievable fidelities and parameters. However, our protocol can be transferred to any other atomic species which features multiple stable states. Our protocol is applicable in quantum simulation and quantum information processing with mesoscopic ensembles requiring fast and high fidelity Rydberg state detection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15473 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The ensemble prepared in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Multi-level extension of the system. The formerly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Basis sets to evaluate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Eigenenergies of the ATI system for increasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Transfer probability and transfer ratio for varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Top) Detection infidelity for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V . Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by- atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two- dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aah3778

    doi:10.1126/science.aah3778 2016

  2. [2]

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, and A. M. Kaufman, Microscopic control and detection of ultracold strontium in optical-tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. X8, 041054 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Cooper, J

    A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, Alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X8, 041055 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2208 (2000)

    2000

  5. [5]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti ´c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature595, 227 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V . Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Läuchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hundreds of rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti ´c, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170503 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    T. M. Graham, M. Kwon, B. Grinkemeyer, Z. Marra, X. Jiang, M. T. Lichtman, Y . Sun, M. Ebert, and M. Saffman, Rydberg- mediated entanglement in a two-dimensional neutral atom qubit array, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 230501 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti ´c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity control and entanglement of rydberg-atom qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 123603 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature622, 2...

    2023

  4. [12]

    T. M. Graham, Y . Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phuttitarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinkemeyer, M. Kwon, M. Ebert, J. Cherek, M. T. Lichtman, M. Gillette, J. Gilbert, D. Bowman, T. Ballance, C. Campbell, E. D. Dahl, O. Crawford, N. S. Blunt, B. Rogers, T. ...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Bluvstein, H

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature 604, 451 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Pause, L

    L. Pause, L. Sturm, M. Mittenbühler, S. Amann, T. Preuschoff, D. Schäffner, M. Schlosser, and G. Birkl, Supercharged two- dimensional tweezer array with more than 1000 atomic qubits, Optica11, 222 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits (2024), arXiv:2403.12021 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Y . Wang, S. Shevate, T. M. Wintermantel, M. Morgado, G. Lochead, and S. Whitlock, Preparation of hundreds of microscopic atomic ensembles in optical tweezer arrays, npj Quantum Information6, 54 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Gosar, V

    K. Gosar, V . Pirc Jevšenak, T. Mežnarši ˇc, D. c. v. Babiˇc, I. Poberaj, E. Zupani ˇc, and P. Jegli ˇc, Preparation of ultracold atomic-ensemble arrays using time-multiplexed optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. A106, 022604 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Ebert, M

    M. Ebert, M. Kwon, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Coherence and rydberg blockade of atomic ensemble qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 093601 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    N. L. R. Spong, Y . Jiao, O. D. W. Hughes, K. J. Weatherill, 9 I. Lesanovsky, and C. S. Adams, Collectively encoded rydberg qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 063604 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    W. Xu, A. V . Venkatramani, S. H. Cantú, T. Šumarac, V . Klüsener, M. D. Lukin, and V . Vuleti´c, Fast preparation and detection of a rydberg qubit using atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 050501 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Bergschneider, V

    A. Bergschneider, V . M. Klinkhamer, J. H. Becher, R. Klemt, G. Zürn, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Spin-resolved single-atom imaging of 6Li in free space, Phys. Rev. A97, 063613 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V . Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 857 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    R. Tao, M. Ammenwerth, F. Gyger, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, High-fidelity detection of large-scale atom arrays in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 013401 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    S. H. Autler and C. H. Townes, Stark effect in rapidly varying fields, Phys. Rev.100, 703 (1955)

    1955

  17. [25]

    Reinhard, T

    A. Reinhard, T. C. Liebisch, B. Knuffman, and G. Raithel, Level shifts of rubidium rydberg states due to binary interactions, Phys. Rev. A75, 032712 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Singer, J

    K. Singer, J. Stanojevic, M. Weidemüller, and R. Côté, Long- range interactions between alkali rydberg atom pairs correlated to the ns–ns, np–np and nd–nd asymptotes, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics38, S295 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    Comparat and P

    D. Comparat and P. Pillet, Dipole blockade in a cold rydberg atomic sample, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B27, A208 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Bender, P

    J. Bender, P. Mischke, T. Klas, F. Binoth, H. Naim, H. Ott, and T. Niederprüm, Competing interactions in strongly driven multi-level systems, New Journal of Physics26, 073012 (2024)

    2024

  21. [30]

    W. Li, I. Mourachko, M. W. Noel, and T. F. Gallagher, Millimeter-wave spectroscopy of cold rb rydberg atoms in a magneto-optical trap: Quantum defects of the ns, np, and nd series, Phys. Rev. A67, 052502 (2003)

    2003

  22. [31]

    Cardman and G

    R. Cardman and G. Raithel, Hyperfine structure ofnP 1/2 rydberg states in 85Rb, Phys. Rev. A106, 052810 (2022)

    2022

  23. [32]

    S. B. S., S. K. Barik, S. Chaudhuri, and S. Roy, Transition frequency measurement of highly excited rydberg states of 87rb for a wide range of principal quantum numbers, Opt. Continuum1, 1176 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    Förster, Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz, Annalen der Physik437, 55 (1948), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.19484370105

    T. Förster, Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz, Annalen der Physik437, 55 (1948), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.19484370105

    1948 doi

  25. [34]

    T. G. Walker and M. Saffman, Consequences of zeeman degeneracy for the van der waals blockade between rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A77, 032723 (2008)

    2008

  26. [35]

    C.-E. Wu, T. Kirova, M. Auzins, and Y .-H. Chen, Rydberg- rydberg interaction strengths and dipole blockade radii in the presence of förster resonances, Opt. Express31, 37094 (2023)

    2023

  27. [36]

    Günter, M

    G. Günter, M. Robert-de Saint-Vincent, H. Schempp, C. S. Hofmann, S. Whitlock, and M. Weidemüller, Interaction enhanced imaging of individual rydberg atoms in dense gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 013002 (2012)

    2012

  28. [37]

    Fuhrmanek, R

    A. Fuhrmanek, R. Bourgain, Y . R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Light-assisted collisions between a few cold atoms in a microscopic dipole trap, Phys. Rev. A85, 062708 (2012)

    2012

  29. [38]

    Gross and W

    C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection, Nature Physics17, 1316–1323 (2021)

    2021

  30. [40]

    W. P. Wolf and R. J. Birgeneau, Electric multipole interactions between rare-earth ions, Phys. Rev.166, 376 (1968)

    1968

  31. [41]

    Tu and E

    S.-J. Tu and E. Fischbach, Random distance distribution for spherical objects: general theory and applications to physics, Journal of Physics A35, 6557 (2002)

    2002

  32. [42]

    I. I. Beterov and M. Saffman, Rydberg blockade, förster resonances, and quantum state measurements with different atomic species, Phys. Rev. A92, 042710 (2015)

    2015

  33. [43]

    P. M. Ireland, D. M. Walker, and J. D. Pritchard, Interspecies förster resonances for rb-cs rydbergd-states for enhanced multi-qubit gate fidelities, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013293 (2024)

    2024

  34. [44]

    J. S. Otto, N. Kjærgaard, and A. B. Deb, Strong zero-field förster resonances in k-rb rydberg systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033474 (2020). 10 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TWO-LEVEL APPROXIMATION The general principle underlying the ATI scheme can be understood from a simple two-l...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.