Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Kinetic approximation for equations of discrete turbulence in the subcritical case

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the energy spectrum of a damped/driven cubic NLS equation on a large torus follows a wave kinetic equation to order $\varepsilon^3$, extending previous quasisolution results to exact solutions.

desk verdict A real step forward: first rigorous event-level kinetic approximation for exact solutions in the subcritical Zakharov-L'vov setting, with a clean cumulant-induction proof; the in-principle gaps are mostly flagged by the author and do not break the main d≥3 theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16488 v2 pith:YDSDZXZF submitted 2025-05-22 math-ph math.APmath.MP

Andrey Dymov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 35Q5560H1535Q82
keywords waveturbulencekineticequationenergyspectrumcubicnonlinearSchrödingercumulantsquasisolutionssubcriticalscalingdiscrete
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that, for a damped/driven cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a large torus, the energy spectrum of the exact solution follows a wave kinetic equation to order $\varepsilon^3$, under a subcritical scaling where the nonlinearity parameter decays as $\varepsilon = L^{-\alpha}$ with $0<\alpha\le 1/2$. This extends a previous result that was limited to second-order 'quasisolutions' (truncations of the amplitude expansion) to the true solutions. The main advance is a uniform-in-torus-size bound on all joint cumulants of the Fourier coefficients, obtained by induction without Feynman diagrams. With these bounds the paper shows that high-order quasisolutions are $\varepsilon^\varrho$-close to exact solutions with overwhelming probability, and the desired kinetic approximation follows. A caveat is that the damping exponent must satisfy $r_* > d-1$, a restriction inherited from a number-theoretic estimate on sums over resonant frequency quadrics.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by an inductive bound on joint cumulants. For a multi-set $J$ of $2p$ random variables drawn from the field family generated by the Gaussian field $a^{(0)}$ and the operators $Y$, Proposition 3.3 gives $|\kappa(J)| \le C^\#_{p,\deg J}(\eta) L^{-(d-1)(p-1)}$, uniformly in time. The induction step uses the Malyshev formula to split a cumulant into products of smaller cumulants; the only genuinely number-theoretic input is the bound of Corollary C.3, which controls sums over the resonant quadric $u\cdot v=0$ by $C_d L^{2(d-1)}\langle(a,b)\rangle^{2(d-1)}$. A second set of estimates of the same type controls the kernels of the linearized operator $L$, allowing inversion of $\mathrm{Id}-\varepsilon L$ on the good event through the identity $(\mathrm{Id}-\varepsilon L)^{-1}=(\sum_{k=0}^{N-1}(\varepsilon L)^k)(\mathrm{Id}-(\varepsilon L)^N)^{-1}$, and a contraction-mapping argument closes the approximation of exact solutions by quasisolutions.

What would settle it

Evaluate numerically the sum $\sum_{u,v\in \mathbb{Z}^d_L,\, u\cdot v=0} \langle (u+a,v+b)\rangle^{-\mu}$ for a Schwartz weight and for shifts with $|a|,|b|\sim L$ (for example $d=3$, $a=(R,0,0)$, $b=(0,R,0)$, $R\sim L$). If the sum exceeds $C_d L^{2(d-1)}\langle(a,b)\rangle^{2(d-1)}$ in any such direction, or violates the uniform bound of Conjecture C.4, then the induction in Proposition 3.3 cannot close as written and the $r_*>d-1$ restriction would be forced rather than removable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 2.1: for $d\ge 3$, subcritical scaling $\varepsilon = L^{-\alpha}$ with $0<\alpha\le 1/2$, and damping $r_* > d-1$, for any finite time $T$ and all large $L$ there is a high-probability event on which the effective equation of discrete turbulence (2.6) has a unique solution whose energy spectrum satisfies $|E_{\Omega_L}|a_s(\tau)|^2 - m(s,\tau)| \le C_{\alpha,T}(s)\varepsilon^3$ uniformly in $s\in \mathbb{Z}^d_L$ and $\tau\in [0,T]$, where $m$ solves the damped/driven wave kinetic equation (1.12). Under an additional moment bound, the same approximation holds for the unrestricted expectation $E|a_s(\tau)|^2$. The proof obtains uniform-in-$L$ estimates for all terms $a^{(m)}_s$ of the amplitude decomposition, so the quasisolution result of [13] is extended from order two to arbitrary order; a contraction argument then shows the exact solution is close to a sufficiently high-order quasisolution on the good event.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the number-theoretic estimate for sums over the resonant set $u\cdot v=0$ with a shifted weight; the needed uniform-in-shift form is only a conjecture, and the available non-uniform bound is what forces the damping exponent $r_* > d-1$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any $M\ge 2$, the energy spectrum of the $M$-th order quasisolution approximates the wave kinetic equation solution with precision $\varepsilon^3$; the earlier restriction to $M=2$ is removed.
  • The kinetic approximation holds for the exact solution of the discrete turbulence equation, not only for quasisolutions, on an event of probability $1-C^\#(L)$, and under a mild moment bound for the unrestricted expectation.
  • In dimension $d=2$ the same theorem holds with the modified scaling $\varepsilon = L^{-\alpha}$, $\alpha \le 1/6$, and the wave kinetic equation solution replaced by $m(s,\tau) + f(s,\tau,L)/\ln L$.
  • If the conjectured uniform-in-shift version of the quadric sum bound (Conjecture C.4) is proved, the restriction $r_* > d-1$ can be removed and the result should extend to all $r_*>0$.
  • The method avoids Feynman diagrams and the finite-field Bezout theorem, requiring only the circle-method estimate; the same cumulant bounds control the time-sup estimates of the solution and of the linearized kernels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the cumulant induction is not tied to the particular damping and noise structure, the same scheme should adapt to deterministic NLS with random initial data in the simultaneous limit $L\to\infty$, $\lambda\to0$, where the kinetic description is the undamped wave kinetic equation; the paper hints at this but does not prove it.
  • The factorial growth in estimate (2.23) is the only obstacle to the critical scaling; a polynomial-in-$m$ improvement of the cumulant bound would likely push Theorem 2.1 to fixed small $\varepsilon$, since the rest of the contraction argument is scale-agnostic.
  • A numerical check of the uniform-in-shift quadric bound would be informative: computing the resonant sums for shifts of order $L$ would show whether the $r_*>d-1$ restriction is an artifact of the proof or a genuine threshold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Zakharov-L'vov stochastic model for wave turbulence, a damped/driven cubic NLS equation on a d-dimensional torus, in the limit when first the viscosity ν tends to zero and then the period L tends to infinity, with a subcritical amplitude scaling ε = L^{-α}, 0 < α ≤ 1/2. For d ≥ 3 and damping growth exponent r∗ > d−1, Theorem 2.1(i) proves an event-level kinetic approximation: on a set Ω_L of probability 1 − C#_r(L), the expectation E_{Ω_L}|a_s(τ)|^2 of the exact solution of the effective discrete-turbulence equation (2.6) is within O(ε^3) of the solution m(s,τ) of the modified wave kinetic equation (1.12), uniformly in τ ∈ [0,T]. The proof works by decomposing the solution into a high-order quasisolution A^M plus a remainder, establishing new uniform-in-L estimates for the terms a^{(m)}_s via an inductive analysis of cumulants rather than Feynman diagrams, proving analogous estimates for iterates of the linearized operator, and then closing a contraction argument on a suitable high-probability event. A second statement, Theorem 2.1(ii), upgrades the result to the unconditional expectation E|a_s(τ)|^2, but only under an imported moment bound (2.7) from [22,24] that is not proved in the manuscript.

Significance. If the event-level theorem is correct, it is a substantial contribution: it gives a rigorous kinetic approximation for exact solutions of this discrete-turbulence model under subcritical scaling, by a method that avoids Feynman diagrams and is presented in a self-contained inductive form. The paper is careful about what is proved and what is imported: the restriction r∗ > d−1 is explicitly traced to the number-theoretic bound in Corollary C.3, and the uniform-in-shift Conjecture C.4 is used only for a conjectured extension, not for the main theorem. The cumulant estimates of Proposition 2.3 and the kernel estimates of Proposition 3.8 are the technical core and appear internally consistent. The principal caveat is that the exact-spectrum claim advertised in the abstract and introduction is conditional on an unproved imported estimate; the unconditional achievement is the event-level statement Theorem 2.1(i).

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.2, §2.1, §2.2] The abstract and the unnumbered Main Theorem in Section 1.2 state the exact-spectrum approximation |n_s(L;τ) − m(s,τ)| ≤ C#_{α,T}(s) ε^3 as the main result. However, Theorem 2.1(ii), which is the exact-spectrum statement for E|a_s|^2, is explicitly conditional on the moment bound (2.7) imported from [22,24]. The text in Section 2.1 admits that (2.7) was proved in [22,24] only for d ≤ 3 and for the particular damping operator (1−Δ), that the L-dependence was not written there, and that the extension to general d and r∗ was only argued. This is load-bearing because the advertised extension to exact solutions rests on this estimate. The unconditional result proved in the manuscript is the event-level Theorem 2.1(i), and the paper should either supply a proof of (2.7) in the present framework or restate the abstract and introduction so that the main theorem is presented as the event-level statement, with the exact-spectrum statement as a conditional corollary.
  2. [§5] The claimed extension to d = 2 is presented only as a sketch. The text asserts that Theorem 2.1 remains true for d = 2 with α ∈ (0,1/6] and states that various bounds should be modified, e.g., replacing ϵ by ϵ/2 and multiplying (3.55) by ln⟨s⟩, but it does not provide the modified proofs. Since the number-theoretic input changes qualitatively in dimension two (the bound (C.5) acquires a logarithmic factor) and the scaling changes to (5.1), the d = 2 claim is not established to the same standard as the d ≥ 3 result. If the d = 2 extension is to be part of the paper's claims, it needs a full proof; otherwise it should be explicitly labelled as an informal outline or a conjecture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.2] The unnumbered 'Main Theorem' in the introduction should be aligned with the precise statement of Theorem 2.1: as written, it presents the exact-spectrum estimate without the condition (2.7), while Theorem 2.1(ii) is conditional.
  2. [Appendix C, proof of Proposition C.1] In the dyadic summation step the displayed exponent controlling the annulus pieces appears to be missing a minus sign: one expects ∥f_j∥_∞ ≤ C ∥f∥_{0,N} 2^{−N(j−1)}, not 2^{N(j−1)}. The conclusion is correct under the intended bound, but the displayed inequality should be fixed.
  3. [§4.3] In the derivation of the I_1 bound in the proof of Theorem 2.1(i), the inequality |w^M_s(τ)| ≤ L^d ⟨s⟩^{−r} |w^M|_{X_r} ≤ ε^3⟨s⟩^{−r} is valid under the stated choices, but the comparison with the condition on ϱ is not shown; adding the one-line verification would improve readability.
  4. [§2.1] The formatting 'Theorem A.([13])' contains a stray period before the bracket reference; this should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular dependency found: the WKE solution m is independently defined, and the cited prior theorems supply genuine external support rather than restating the target.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (1) Theorem 2.2 from [13] (Theorem A) gives the approximation of the quasisolution spectrum E|A^2_s|^2 by the WKE solution m(s,τ); (2) the new Proposition 2.3 / Proposition 3.3 provides uniform cumulant bounds for all terms a^(m)_s, using only the circle-method bound Corollary C.3 imported from [14]; (3) Theorem 2.8 shows the high-order quasisolution A^M approximates the exact solution on a high-probability event; (4) Theorem 2.1 assembles these ingredients. Throughout, m(s,τ) is the unique solution of the independently defined WKE (1.12) with kernel K(s,τ) constructed in Appendix A; no parameter is fitted to E|a_s|^2, and the approximation is checked against m, not derived from it. The self-citations to [13] and [14] are published theorems with hypotheses (d≥3, quasisolution order 2, L≥ε^{-2}, circle-method estimates) that do not include the exact-solution approximation of Theorem 2.1; they are therefore legitimate external support, not circular premises. Corollary C.4 is explicitly labeled a conjecture and is used only for the speculative extension to all r∗>0, not for the main theorem. The exact-spectrum statement Theorem 2.1(ii) is conditional on the L-dependent moment bound (2.7) imported from [22,24]; this is an openly stated assumption, not a hidden circular reduction, and the unconditional event-level statement (i) does not use it. No equation reduces to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theorem has no fitted constants: ε, T, and r∗ are model or scaling inputs. The paper is not self-contained, importing the second-order quasisolution/WKE analysis from [13], the quadric sum bound from [14], and the moment bound (2.7) from [22,24] for part (ii); these are prior theorems rather than fits to the target spectrum. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • subcritical scaling exponent α = α ∈ (0,1/2] for d≥3; α ∈ (0,1/6] for d=2
    Parameter in ε=L^{-α}; chosen so that (εL)^N →0 for N > α^{-1}(d+3). It is not fitted to data, but the theorem only holds for this range.
  • finite time horizon T = arbitrary T>0
    The constants C#_{α,T} depend on T; the approximation is uniform on the finite interval [0,T].
  • damping growth exponent r∗ = r∗ > d−1
    This lower bound is assumed so that the number-theoretic bound (C.5) yields the needed decay; it is a model restriction, not a fitted constant.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Heath-Brown circle-method bound from [14], Corollary C.3: shifted sums over the quadric u·v=0 with rapidly decaying weights satisfy (C.5), with polynomial factor ⟨(a,b)⟩^{2(d−1)}.
    Used in Proposition 3.3 to sum over u·v=0 in the resonant condition; this is the source of the r∗>d−1 restriction.
  • domain assumption Theorem 2.2 of [13]: for the order-2 quasisolution A^2, |E|A^2_s|^2 − m(s,τ)| ≤ C_r⟨s⟩^{−r}ε^3, plus existence and uniqueness of the WKE solution m.
    This prior theorem is the base quasisolution approximation on which Proposition 2.4 and the final theorem rely.
  • domain assumption Well-posedness and uniform moment bound (2.7) for exact solutions of (2.6), claimed to follow from [22,24] but not written there with explicit L-dependence.
    Needed for Theorem 2.1(ii) to pass from the good event Ω_L to the full expectation.
  • domain assumption Modeling assumptions: damping γ0 satisfies (1.4), noise amplitude b(s) is Schwartz, initial data is zero, the limit order is first ν→0 then L→∞, and λ=ενL.
    These define the problem and provide the stochastic Gaussian base process a^(0).
  • standard math Standard cumulant facts: Leonov-Shiryaev formula (B.4) and Malyshev formula (B.5).
    These are the algebraic backbone of the inductive cumulant estimates in Sections 3 and Appendix E.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinetic approximation for equations of discrete turbulence in the subcritical case." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YDSDZXZF

@misc{pith2026250516488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinetic approximation for equations of discrete turbulence in the subcritical case},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YDSDZXZF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16488}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a damped/driven cubic NLS equation on a torus under the limit when first the amplitude of solutions goes to zero and then the period of the torus goes to infinity. We suggest another proof of the kinetic approximation for the energy spectrum under a subcritical scaling, extending to the exact solutions result obtained in [Dymov, Kuksin, Maiocchi, Vladuts '2023] for quasisolutions which were defined as the second order truncations of decompositions for the solutions in amplitude. The proof does not involve Feynman diagrams, instead relying on a robust inductive analysis of cumulants.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    Dymov, S.B

    A. Dymov, S.B. Kuksin, A. Maiocchi and S. Vladuts, The long space-period limit for equations of discrete turbulence , Ann. H. Poincar´ e24, 3685-3739 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [14]

    Dymov, S

    A. Dymov, S. Kuksin, A. Maiocchi, S. Vl˘ adut ¸,A refinement of Heath-Brown ’s theorem on quadratic forms , Sbornik: Mathematics (2023). 46 ANDREY DYMOV

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Bedrossian, A note on cascade flux laws for the stochastically-driven nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinearity, 37, Paper No

    J. Bedrossian, A note on cascade flux laws for the stochastically-driven nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinearity, 37, Paper No. 065007, (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [2]

    Buckmaster, P

    T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, J. Shatah, Effective dynamics of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on large domains, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71, 1407–1460, (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [3]

    Buckmaster, P

    T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, J. Shatah, Onset of the wave turbulence descrip- tion of the longtime behaviour of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Invent. Math. 225, 787–855 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [4]

    Collot, P

    C. Collot, P. Germain, On the derivation of the homogeneous kinetic wave equation , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 78, 856-909 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [5]

    Collot, P

    C. Collot, P. Germain, Derivation of the homogeneous kinetic wave equation: longer time scales, (2020), arXiv:2007.03508

    arXiv 2020

  8. [6]

    Y. Deng, Z. Hani, On the derivation of the wave kinetic equation for NLS , Forum of Mathematics, Pi 9, 1–37 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 36 references
  1. [7]

    Y. Deng, Z. Hani, Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation , Invent. Math. 233, 543–724 (2023)

    2023

  2. [8]

    Y. Deng, Z. Hani, Derivation of the wave kinetic equation: full range of scaling laws , (2023), arXiv:2301.07063

    2023 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Y. Deng, Z. Hani, Long time justification of wave turbulence theory , (2023), arXiv:2311.10082

    2023 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Dymov, S

    A. Dymov, S. Kuksin, On the Zakharov-L’vov stochastic model for wave turbulence , Dokl. Math. 101, 102-109 (2020)

    2020

  5. [11]

    Dymov, S

    A. Dymov, S. Kuksin, Formal expansions in stochastic model for wave turbulence 1: kinetic limit , Comm. Math. Phys. 382, 951–1014 (2021)

    2021

  6. [12]

    Dymov, S

    A. Dymov, S. Kuksin, Formal expansions in stochastic model for wave turbulence 2: method of diagram decomposition, J. Stat. Phys. 190, article number: 3 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Erd¨ os, B

    L. Erd¨ os, B. Schlein, H.-T. Yau, Derivation of the cubic non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation from quantum dynamics of many-body systems , Invent. Math. 167, 515-614 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Erd¨ os, H.T

    L. Erd¨ os, H.T. Yau,Linear Boltzmann equation as the weak coupling limit of a random Schr¨ odinger equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 53, 667-735 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    Faou, Linearized wave turbulence convergence results for three-wave systems , Comm

    E. Faou, Linearized wave turbulence convergence results for three-wave systems , Comm. Math. Physics 378, 807-849 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    E. Faou, P. Germain, Z. Hani, The weakly nonlinear large-box limit of the 2D cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 29, 915–982 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Z. Hani, R. Grande, Rigorous derivation of damped-driven wave turbulence theory , (2024), arXiv:2407.10711

    2024

  12. [20]

    Hannani, M

    A. Hannani, M. Rosenzweig, G. Staffilani, and M.-B. Tran, On the Wave Turbulence Theory for a stochastic KdV type equation - generalization for the inhomogeneous kinetic limit , (2022), arXiv:2210.17445

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Heath–Brown, A new form of the circle method, and its application to quadratic forms, J

    D.R. Heath–Brown, A new form of the circle method, and its application to quadratic forms, J. Reine Angew. Math. 481 (1996), 149-206

    1996

  14. [22]

    Huang, S

    G. Huang, S. Kuksin, A. Maiocchi, Time-averaging for weakly nonlinear CGL equa- tions with arbitrary potentials , Fields Inst. Commun. 75, 323–349 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Kuksin, A

    S. Kuksin, A. Maiocchi, Derivation of a wave kinetic equation from the resonant- averaged stochastic NLS equation , Physica D 309, 65-70 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Kuksin and A

    S. Kuksin and A. Maiocchi, Resonant averaging for small solutions of stochastic NLS equations, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 147A, 1–38 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Lukkarinen, M

    J. Lukkarinen, M. Marcozzi, Wick polynomials and time-evolution of cumulants , J. Math. Phys. 57, 083301 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Lukkarinen, H

    J. Lukkarinen, H. Spohn, Weakly nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with random initial data, Invent. Math. 183, 79–188 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Nazarenko, Wave Turbulence, Springer 2011

    S. Nazarenko, Wave Turbulence, Springer 2011

    2011

  20. [28]

    Newell, B

    A.C. Newell, B. Rumpf, Wave Turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 59-78 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    Peccati, M.S

    G. Peccati, M.S. Taqqu, Wiener Chaos: Moments, Cumulants and Diagrams , Springer-Verlag Italia 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Peierls, On the kinetic theory of thermal conduction in crystals , Selected Scientific Papers of Sir Rudolf Peierls, with commentary, World Scientific, Singapore (1997), 15-48

    R. Peierls, On the kinetic theory of thermal conduction in crystals , Selected Scientific Papers of Sir Rudolf Peierls, with commentary, World Scientific, Singapore (1997), 15-48

    1997

  23. [31]

    Shiryaev, Probability, 2nd edition, Springer 1996

    A. Shiryaev, Probability, 2nd edition, Springer 1996

    1996

  24. [32]

    Staffilani and M.-B

    G. Staffilani and M.-B. Tran, On the wave turbulence theory for stochastic and random multidimensional KdV type equations , (2021), arXiv:2106.09819

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    de Suzzoni, A

    A.-S. de Suzzoni, A. Stingo, A. Touati, Wave turbulence for a semilinear Klein- Gordon system, (2025), arXiv:2503.24222

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Vladuts, An algebraic geometry question and wave turbulence , (2024), arXiv:2409.12316

    S. Vladuts, An algebraic geometry question and wave turbulence , (2024), arXiv:2409.12316

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Zakharov, V

    V. Zakharov, V. L’vov, Statistical description of nonlinear wave fields , Radiophys. Quan. Electronics 18, 1084-1097 (1975)

    1975

  28. [36]

    Zakharov, V

    V. Zakharov, V. L’vov, G. Falkovich, Kolmogorov Spectra of Turbulence , Springer 1992. Steklov Mathematical Institute of RAS, Moscow, Russia & National Re- search University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia & Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Ru...

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.