Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Constructive approach to solution of the conservation condition for conformal higher spin tree-point correlation function with equal spins

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that conserved three-point functions of equal-spin conformal currents can be built, for any spin, from powers of four spin-one and spin-two building blocks, and it verifies the construction for spin three and four.

desk verdict A genuinely constructive method for s=3,4 conserved correlators, with a real but not fatal gap: the general ansatz rests on counting, not proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16634 v2 pith:WKH4N627 submitted 2025-05-22 hep-th

Melik Karapetyan , Ruben Manvelyan This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords conformalfieldtheoryhigherspincurrentsthree-pointcorrelationfunctionOsborn-PetkoustructuraltensorconservationconditionAdS/CFTcorrespondencecubicinteractionverticesequalspins
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors propose a constructive recipe for all three-point correlation functions of identical conformal higher-spin currents: take the four principal tensors that appear at spin one and spin two — G and Ψ from spin one, F1 and F2 from spin two — and form every monomial whose total degree equals the spin s. Counting these monomials reproduces exactly the known number of independent solutions of the Osborn-Petkou symmetry conditions, so they hypothesize that this monomial basis is complete. For spin three and spin four they then carry out the second step, forming linear combinations whose divergence vanishes, and in each case obtain all s+1 conserved correlation functions. If the completeness hypothesis holds for all spins, the hard classification problem of higher-spin correlators reduces to algebraic bookkeeping, and the spin-two pieces acquire a physical meaning as curvature corrections to flat-space cubic vertices in the dual AdS description.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the monomial ansatz (3.31) together with the divergence operator $\mathrm{Div}_a$ of (2.12). The ansatz asserts that the structural tensor of spin s is spanned by products $G^{s-2k-n}\Psi^n F_1^{k-m}F_2^m$, where G and Ψ are the two independent structures of the spin-one correlator and F1, F2 are the two additional structures that first appear at spin two; the coefficient count in the ansatz equals the independently computed number $N_{sss}$ in (3.29). The conservation condition is translated into $\mathrm{Div}_a \tilde t^{(s)}=0$, and the paper's work is to assemble the monomials into combinations whose divergence cancels term by term, which for spin three and four is achieved by the explicit lists (4.15)-(4.18) and (4.61)-(4.65). The spin-two building blocks play the role of lower-derivative corrections: in the bulk interpretation they correspond to curvature corrections to the flat-space cubic vertex.

What would settle it

For spin five, build all monomials allowed by the ansatz (3.31), impose the Osborn-Petkou symmetry conditions, and look for linear combinations with vanishing divergence; the hypothesis predicts exactly 6 independent conserved structures, so finding a different number — or discovering symmetry-allowed tensors outside the monomial basis — would refute the general claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is stated as the ansatz (3.31): the kernel structural tensor $\tilde t^{(s)}(a,b;c;\hat X)$ for the equal-spin three-point function is a linear combination of monomials $G^{s-2k-n}\Psi^{n} F_1^{k-m}F_2^m$, with the four principal terms defined by the spin-one correlators $G(a,b;c;\hat X)$ and $\Psi(a,b,c;\hat X)$ and the extra spin-two structures $F_1(a,b;c;\hat X)$ and $F_2(a,b;c;\hat X)$. The free coefficients in this ansatz number exactly $N_{sss}$, the count of independent solutions of the symmetry conditions (2.7)-(2.8). For the first nontrivial cases the authors construct the conserved combinations directly: four for spin three (4.19) and five for spin four (4.66), each built from pure spin-one parts $L^{(s)}_i$ plus spin-two corrections $M^{(s)}_k$, with the mixing matrix invertible in both cases. They further interpret the pure spin-one powers as the boundary image of flat-space cubic vertices with maximal derivatives, and the spin-two insertions as the image of curvature corrections required by AdS covariance, matching the vertex classification in the references they cite.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that every independent solution of the symmetry conditions is a linear combination of the monomials built from the four spin-one and spin-two objects; the paper verifies this only for spins three and four, and for higher spins it remains a conjecture.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For spin three and four, the paper delivers explicit closed-form conserved correlators — four and five independent ones respectively — written directly in terms of the four building blocks.
  • If the ansatz is complete for general s, classifying equal-spin correlators reduces to counting monomials in (3.31) and solving a linear system for vanishing divergences, with no new tensor structures appearing as the spin grows.
  • The number s+1 of conserved combinations found here matches the count of independent cubic interaction vertices in one higher dimension, supporting the conjectured holographic dictionary for higher spins.
  • The spin-two contributions to each correlator can be read as the boundary counterpart of AdS curvature corrections, giving a concrete prescription for how flat-space vertices are promoted to AdS vertices.
  • The authors note that the explicit constructions should be a suitable starting point for studying the singular behaviour at d=4 and extracting higher-spin trace anomalies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the monomial ansatz is complete, the equal-spin three-point problem is governed by an effective algebra of just four generators; a generating-function treatment in s could produce all conserved correlators at once, with the s+1 solutions encoded in a single determinant or Pfaffian.
  • The same 'principal terms' strategy might extend to mixed-spin correlators, where the kernel would mix powers of spin-one and spin-two objects with symmetry factors; the counting would then be a restricted product, which could be checked against known mixed-spin counts.
  • The paper's interpretation suggests a direct holographic check beyond counting: compute the cubic vertex for spin-three and spin-four massless fields in AdS_{d+1} and compare the relative coefficients of the flat-space and curvature-corrected pieces with the coefficients found here; agreement would elevate the correspondence from counting to dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a constructive ansatz, Eq. (3.31), for the Osborn-Petkou structural tensor of the three-point correlation function of three identical higher-spin conserved currents: every symmetry-adapted tensor at spin s is written as a linear combination of monomials in powers of the spin-one objects G and Ψ and the spin-two objects F1 and F2. The authors verify the ansatz for spins s=3 and s=4, obtaining respectively four and five explicitly conserved combinations whose divergence vanishes via Eq. (4.19) and Eq. (4.66). They further interpret the spin-two contributions as AdS curvature corrections to flat-space cubic vertices and conjecture that the construction extends to arbitrary spin.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides an explicit, constructive route to all equal-spin conserved three-point correlators from spin-one and spin-two building blocks, matching the known counting N_sss and the expected s+1 conserved structures. The explicit s=3 and s=4 formulas are nontrivial and the advertised AdS/CFT interpretation, while qualitative, is interesting and connects the construction to the existing classification of cubic vertices. The paper also gives detailed divergence formulas in the appendices that can, in principle, be checked independently. However, the two main pillars of the central claim—completeness of the ansatz and the reduction to the compact identities for s=4—are not fully demonstrated in the manuscript, so the verification is presently incomplete.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (3.31)-(3.32)] The central ansatz is supported only by the coefficient count #(A_knm)=N_sss. This does not prove that the monomials in (3.31) are linearly independent or that they span the solution space of the symmetry conditions (2.7)-(2.8). The tensors G, Ψ, F1, F2 satisfy algebraic relations—for example, I(a,b;X)=(ab)-2(aX)(bX) is used in their definitions—and the symmetry conditions impose further linear constraints on the coefficients, so a raw coefficient count cannot substitute for a rank computation. The paper asserts for s=3 and s=4 that the eight and fourteen terms are independent, but no independence proof is given. Without this, the claim that the construction yields all s+1 conserved correlators is not established.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.41)-(4.58)] The reduction from the Appendix divergences (A.7)-(A.20) to the compact identities (4.50)-(4.58) is presented as the outcome of 'lengthy calculations' and is not shown. These identities are the direct input for the five conserved combinations (4.61)-(4.65), so the spin-4 verification cannot be checked from the manuscript as it stands. The claimed result would become verifiable if the intermediate combinations and the use of relations (A.21)-(A.26) were spelled out, or if a machine-readable computation were provided as supplementary material.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.52) and (4.55)] The displayed divergences of T3 and T6 contain an unmatched parenthesis; the expressions should read ((d−2)Γ^2 + 4ΓΨ + F2)(a∇)I^2 rather than ((d−2)Γ^2 + 4ΓΨ) + F2)(a∇)I^2.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.67)-(4.68)] The vectors in the spin-4 matrix equation are labelled with spin-3 quantities (t^{(s=3)}_i, M^{(3)}_k, L^{(3)}_i); they should be relabelled with spin-4 superscripts to avoid confusion.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (4.23) and Appendix (A.5)] The determinant of the spin-3 mixing matrix contains a factor (d−2), and the inverse matrix in (A.5) has (d−2) in denominators; the paper should state explicitly the assumed dimension range, presumably d>3 or d≥3 with a separate check.
  4. [Section 4, 'independent terms'] The phrase 'independent terms' is used without a definition; the authors should specify whether it means linear independence over the coefficient space or independence as solutions of the symmetry conditions (2.7)-(2.8).
  5. [Introduction, Section 3] There is a typo in 'At the and of this section' which should read 'At the end of this section'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Explicit divergence cancellations for s=3,4 are self-contained; only the exhaustiveness counts are imported from the authors' own earlier classification [94].

  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Section 3, around eqs. (3.29)-(3.33); used again in Section 4]
    "In [94] we have classified all possible terms forming the solution of the symmetry conditions in general case. In the case of the equal spins the number of the independent solutions of (2.7) and (2.8) are: N^{even}_{sss}=... Another important classification result for us is that the number of solutions of the conservation condition (2.10),(2.11) is s+1."

    The completeness of the central ansatz (3.31) is asserted because its raw monomial count #(A_knm) equals N_sss, where N_sss is stated to be the number of independent symmetry solutions from the authors' own previous classification [94]. Raw coefficient-count equality with a dimension imported from a self-citation is not a proof that the monomials form a basis. The same self-citation supplies the s+1 count used to declare that the four (or five) explicitly constructed conserved combinations exhaust the space of conserved correlators. However, the explicit Div=0 checks in (4.19) and (4.66) are genuine algebraic verifications that do not assume the target result, so the circularity is confined to the exhaustiveness/completeness assertion rather than to the construction itself.

full rationale

The paper's core constructive work — writing down the symmetry-satisfying monomials built from G, Ψ, F1, F2, computing their divergences, and solving the linear cancellation conditions to obtain four conserved combinations for s=3 and five for s=4 — is carried out explicitly in the text and does not fit any data. Equations (4.19) and (4.66) state verified identities, and the matrix manipulations in (4.20)-(4.24) are algebraic consequences of the displayed divergence formulas. The ansatz (3.31) itself is a genuine hypothesis: its raw term count is equal to the generating sum (3.29) by construction, but the claim that this count equals the number of independent solutions of (2.7)-(2.8) is imported from the authors' own [94], as is the s+1 count of conserved solutions used to establish exhaustiveness. This is a load-bearing self-citation for the completeness claims, but not a definitional reduction of the verified divergence cancellations, and the counts are externally checkable. The skeptical concern that count equality does not prove linear independence is a mathematical rigor gap, not a circular step. Overall, the derivation is largely self-contained, with only this mild self-citation burden, so a score of 2 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters: the only numbers in the construction are the spacetime dimension d and rational coefficients fixed by divergence cancellation, not fitted to data. The axioms are the OP formulation, the counting results from [94], the completeness ansatz (3.31), the asserted algebraic identities, and the AdS interpretation.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Osborn-Petkou representation (2.2)-(2.8) for the three-point function of traceless conserved currents, including the equivalence of the conservation condition to Div_a tilde t = 0 in (2.11)-(2.12).
    Used as the starting framework in Section 2; taken from [68] and [94].
  • domain assumption The counting formulas N_sss (3.27)-(3.29) and the statement that the number of conserved equal-spin solutions is s+1.
    Imported from the authors' previous paper [94] and used to know how many independent terms and conserved combinations to look for; no independent proof is repeated here.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz (3.31) that every symmetry-adapted structural tensor at spin s is a linear combination of monomials G^{s-2k-n} Psi^n F1^{k-m} F2^m.
    This is the central hypothesis of the paper; it is verified only by counting agreement for s=3,4, not proven for arbitrary s (Section 3, eq. (3.31)).
  • ad hoc to paper The divergence identities (A.1)-(A.4), (A.7)-(A.20), and the gradient relations (A.21)-(A.26) used to simplify the spin-4 construction.
    The paper states these follow from 'lengthy calculation' (Section 4 and Appendix) and does not provide full derivations or computer algebra verification.
  • ad hoc to paper The identification of spin-two F1, F2 contributions with AdS curvature corrections to flat cubic vertices.
    Interpretation based on matching notation to flat-space vertex classification [42,44,48], stated in Section 4 and the Conclusion; not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constructive approach to solution of the conservation condition for conformal higher spin tree-point correlation function with equal spins." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WKH4N627

@misc{pith2026250516634,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constructive approach to solution of the conservation condition for conformal higher spin tree-point correlation function with equal spins},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WKH4N627}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16634}
}
abstract

We propose a new constructive approach to the solutions of the conservation condition for the three-point conformal correlation function in the Osborn-Petkou formulation generalized by the authors for higher spins. We propose for correlation functions of the same spin conformal currents the general hypothesis that the Osborn-Petkou structural tensor of higher spins satisfying the right symmetry conditions can be obtained from the combination of the principal terms of spin one and two structural tensors raised to the degree corresponding to the value of spin s. We verified this hypothesis for the case of spin three and four and showed that the construction of the conserved three-point function can be reduced to the algebraic task of canceling the right hand sides of the divergences of constructed terms. Moreover it follows from this consideration that for spin three and four cases our solutions can be interpreted as the $CFT$-dual to the cubic interaction in the AdS space with one dimension more.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetric formulation for higher spin correlators, quantum effective action and anomaly

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The trace anomaly of the higher-spin conformal effective action is shown to be the single source of both trace and gauge anomalies, with a 2s-derivative structure in d=4.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998), 231; [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998), 253; [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Cubic Interaction Terms for Arbitrary Spin,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson and L. Brink, “Cubic Interaction Terms for Arbitrary Spin,” Nucl. Phys. B227(1983), 31

    1983

  4. [4]

    On Spin Three Selfinteractions,

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers and H. Van Dam, “On Spin Three Selfinteractions,” Z. Phys. C24(1984), 247

    1984

  5. [5]

    On the Theoretical Problems in Constructing Interactions Involving Higher Spin Massless Particles,

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers and H. van Dam, “On the Theoretical Problems in Constructing Interactions Involving Higher Spin Massless Particles,” Nucl. Phys. B 260(1985), 295

    1985

  6. [6]

    On the Gravitational Interaction of Massless Higher Spin Fields,

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “On the Gravitational Interaction of Massless Higher Spin Fields,” Phys. Lett. B189(1987), 89

    1987

  7. [7]

    Cubic Interaction in Extended Theories of Massless Higher Spin Fields,

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “Cubic Interaction in Extended Theories of Massless Higher Spin Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B291(1987), 141. – 22 –

    1987

  8. [8]

    Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson and N. Linden, “Interacting Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front,” Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987), 1333

    1987

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    A Cubic interaction of totally symmetric massless representations of the Lorentz group in arbitrary dimensions,

    E. S. Fradkin and R. R. Metsaev, “A Cubic interaction of totally symmetric massless representations of the Lorentz group in arbitrary dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav.8 (1991), L89

    1991

  2. [10]

    Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991), 359

    1991

  3. [11]

    S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,

    R. R. Metsaev, “S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of internal symmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991), 2411

    1991

  4. [12]

    Cubic interactions of bosonic higher spin gauge fields in AdS 5,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Cubic interactions of bosonic higher spin gauge fields in AdS 5,” Nucl. Phys. B616(2001), 106-162 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B652(2003), 407-407]; [hep-th/0106200]

    2001 arXiv

  5. [13]

    N=1 supersymmetric theory of higher spin gauge fields in AdS(5) at the cubic level,

    K. B. Alkalaev and M. A. Vasiliev, “N=1 supersymmetric theory of higher spin gauge fields in AdS(5) at the cubic level,” Nucl. Phys. B655(2003), 57; [hep-th/0206068]

    2003 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Conformal coupling of higher spin gauge fields to a scalar field in AdS(4) and generalized Weyl invariance,

    R. Manvelyan and W. R¨ uhl, “Conformal coupling of higher spin gauge fields to a scalar field in AdS(4) and generalized Weyl invariance,” Phys. Lett. B593(2004), 253; [hep-th/0403241]

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Spin three gauge theory revisited,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger and S. Cnockaert, “Spin three gauge theory revisited,” JHEP 01(2006), 052; [hep-th/0508048]

    2006 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Cubic interaction vertices of massive and massless higher spin fields,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices of massive and massless higher spin fields,” Nucl. Phys. B759(2006), 147; [hep-th/0512342]

    2006 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On killing tensors and cubic vertices in higher-spin gauge theories,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, S. Cnockaert and S. Leclercq, “On killing tensors and cubic vertices in higher-spin gauge theories,” Fortsch. Phys.54(2006), 282; [hep-th/0602092]

    2006 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Consistent couplings between spin-2 and spin-3 massless fields,

    N. Boulanger and S. Leclercq, “Consistent couplings between spin-2 and spin-3 massless fields,” JHEP11(2006), 034; [hep-th/0609221]

    2006 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Current Exchanges and Unconstrained Higher Spins,

    D. Francia, J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “Current Exchanges and Unconstrained Higher Spins,” Nucl. Phys. B773(2007), 203; [hep-th/0701163]

    2007 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Higher-Spin Gauge Fields Interacting with Scalars: The Lagrangian Cubic Vertex,

    A. Fotopoulos, N. Irges, A. C. Petkou and M. Tsulaia, “Higher-Spin Gauge Fields Interacting with Scalars: The Lagrangian Cubic Vertex,” JHEP10(2007), 021; [0708.1399]

    2007 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Cubic interaction vertices for fermionic and bosonic arbitrary spin fields,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices for fermionic and bosonic arbitrary spin fields,” Nucl. Phys. B859(2012), 13; [0712.3526]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gauge Invariant Lagrangians for Free and Interacting Higher Spin Fields. A Review of the BRST formulation,

    A. Fotopoulos and M. Tsulaia, “Gauge Invariant Lagrangians for Free and Interacting Higher Spin Fields. A Review of the BRST formulation,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24 – 23 – (2009), 1; [0805.1346]

    2009 arXiv

  15. [23]

    On spin 3 interacting with gravity,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “On spin 3 interacting with gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009), 035022; [0805.2226]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    On The Uniqueness of Minimal Coupling in Higher-Spin Gauge Theory,

    N. Boulanger, S. Leclercq and P. Sundell, “On The Uniqueness of Minimal Coupling in Higher-Spin Gauge Theory,” JHEP08(2008), 056; [0805.2764]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Conformal invariant interaction of a scalar field with the higher spin field in AdS(D),

    R. Manvelyan and K. Mkrtchyan, “Conformal invariant interaction of a scalar field with the higher spin field in AdS(D),” Mod. Phys. Lett. A25(2010), 1333; [0903.0058]

    2010 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Off-shell construction of some trilinear higher spin gauge field interactions,

    R. Manvelyan, K. Mkrtchyan and W. R¨ uhl, “Off-shell construction of some trilinear higher spin gauge field interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B826(2010), 1; [0903.0243]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    On higher spin interactions with matter,

    X. Bekaert, E. Joung and J. Mourad, “On higher spin interactions with matter,” JHEP 05(2009), 126; [0903.3338]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Direct Construction of A Cubic Selfinteraction for Higher Spin gauge Fields,

    R. Manvelyan, K. Mkrtchyan and W. R¨ uhl, “Direct Construction of A Cubic Selfinteraction for Higher Spin gauge Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B844(2011), 348; [1002.1358]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    General trilinear interaction for arbitrary even higher spin gauge fields,

    R. Manvelyan, K. Mkrtchyan and W. R¨ uhl, “General trilinear interaction for arbitrary even higher spin gauge fields,” Nucl. Phys. B836(2010), 204; [1003.2877]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    String Lessons for Higher-Spin Interactions,

    A. Sagnotti and M. Taronna, “String Lessons for Higher-Spin Interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B842(2011), 299; [1006.5242]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Spin 3 cubic vertices in a frame-like formalism,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “Spin 3 cubic vertices in a frame-like formalism,” JHEP08(2010), 084; [1007.0158]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    On the Tensionless Limit of String theory, Off - Shell Higher Spin Interaction Vertices and BCFW Recursion Relations,

    A. Fotopoulos and M. Tsulaia, “On the Tensionless Limit of String theory, Off - Shell Higher Spin Interaction Vertices and BCFW Recursion Relations,” JHEP11(2010), 086; [1009.0727]

    2010 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A Generating function for the cubic interactions of higher spin fields,

    R. Manvelyan, K. Mkrtchyan and W. R¨ uhl, “A Generating function for the cubic interactions of higher spin fields,” Phys. Lett. B696(2011), 410; [1009.1054]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Higher Spins and Open Strings: Quartic Interactions,

    D. Polyakov, “Higher Spins and Open Strings: Quartic Interactions,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011), 046005; [1011.0353]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Solving Noether’s equations for gauge invariant local Lagrangians of N arbitrary higher even spin fields,

    W. R¨ uhl, “Solving Noether’s equations for gauge invariant local Lagrangians of N arbitrary higher even spin fields,” [1108.0225]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cubic Vertices for Symmetric Higher-Spin Gauge Fields in (A)dS d,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Cubic Vertices for Symmetric Higher-Spin Gauge Fields in (A)dS d,” Nucl. Phys. B862(2012), 341; [1108.5921]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cubic interactions of massless higher spins in (A)dS: metric-like approach,

    E. Joung and M. Taronna, “Cubic interactions of massless higher spins in (A)dS: metric-like approach,” Nucl. Phys. B861(2012), 145; [1110.5918]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [38]

    On the Structure of Quartic Vertices for Massless Higher Spin Fields on Minkowski Background,

    P. Dempster and M. Tsulaia, “On the Structure of Quartic Vertices for Massless Higher Spin Fields on Minkowski Background,” Nucl. Phys. B865(2012), 353; [1203.5597]. – 24 –

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    On the cubic interactions of massive and partially-massless higher spins in (A)dS,

    E. Joung, L. Lopez and M. Taronna, “On the cubic interactions of massive and partially-massless higher spins in (A)dS,” JHEP07(2012), 041; [1203.6578]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cubic interaction vertex of higher-spin fields with external electromagnetic field,

    I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev and Y. M. Zinoviev, “Cubic interaction vertex of higher-spin fields with external electromagnetic field,” Nucl. Phys. B864(2012), 694; [1204.2341]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Higher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields and Their Electromagnetic Coupling,

    M. Henneaux, G. Lucena G´ omez and R. Rahman, “Higher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields and Their Electromagnetic Coupling,” JHEP08(2012), 093; [1206.1048]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Solving the Noether procedure for cubic interactions of higher spins in (A)dS,

    E. Joung, L. Lopez and M. Taronna, “Solving the Noether procedure for cubic interactions of higher spins in (A)dS,” J. Phys. A46(2013), 214020; [1207.5520]

    2013 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Radial Reduction and Cubic Interaction for Higher Spins in (A)dS space,

    R. Manvelyan, R. Mkrtchyan and W. R¨ uhl, “Radial Reduction and Cubic Interaction for Higher Spins in (A)dS space,” Nucl. Phys. B872(2013), 265; [1210.7227]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Generating functions of (partially-)massless higher-spin cubic interactions,

    E. Joung, L. Lopez and M. Taronna, “Generating functions of (partially-)massless higher-spin cubic interactions,” JHEP01(2013), 168; [1211.5912]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Non-abelian cubic vertices for higher-spin fields in anti-de Sitter space,

    N. Boulanger, D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Non-abelian cubic vertices for higher-spin fields in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP05(2013), 008; [1211.6979]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Gravitational Interactions of Higher-Spin Fermions,

    M. Henneaux, G. Lucena G´ omez and R. Rahman, “Gravitational Interactions of Higher-Spin Fermions,” JHEP01(2014), 087; [1310.5152]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cubic-interaction-induced deformations of higher-spin symmetries,

    E. Joung and M. Taronna, “Cubic-interaction-induced deformations of higher-spin symmetries,” JHEP03(2014), 103; [1311.0242]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Spinor-Helicity Three-Point Amplitudes from Local Cubic Interactions,

    E. Conde, E. Joung and K. Mkrtchyan, “Spinor-Helicity Three-Point Amplitudes from Local Cubic Interactions,” JHEP08(2016), 040; [1605.07402]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Investigations into Light-front Quartic Interactions for Massless Fields (I): Non-constructibility of Higher Spin Quartic Amplitudes,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, “Investigations into Light-front Quartic Interactions for Massless Fields (I): Non-constructibility of Higher Spin Quartic Amplitudes,” JHEP12(2016), 134; [1607.06659]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cubic interactions of Maxwell-like higher spins,

    D. Francia, G. L. Monaco and K. Mkrtchyan, “Cubic interactions of Maxwell-like higher spins,” JHEP04(2017), 068; [1611.00292]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    On the Non-Local Obstruction to Interacting Higher Spins in Flat Space,

    M. Taronna, “On the Non-Local Obstruction to Interacting Higher Spins in Flat Space,” JHEP05(2017), 026; [1701.05772]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space,

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space,” JHEP04(2017), 139; [1701.05773]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), 171604; [1704.07859]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Feynman rules for higher-spin gauge fields on AdS d+1,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Feynman rules for higher-spin gauge fields on AdS d+1,” JHEP01(2018), 060; [1708.08668]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Cubic interaction for higher spins – 25 – in AdSd+1 space in the explicit covariant form,

    M. Karapetyan, R. Manvelyan and R. Poghossian, “Cubic interaction for higher spins – 25 – in AdSd+1 space in the explicit covariant form,” Nucl. Phys. B950(2020), 114876; [1908.07901]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A note on higher-order vertices of higher-spin fields in flat and (A)dS space,

    E. Joung and M. Taronna, “A note on higher-order vertices of higher-spin fields in flat and (A)dS space,” JHEP09(2020), 171; [1912.12357]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Restrictions forn-Point Vertices in Higher-Spin Theories,

    S. Fredenhagen, O. Kr¨ uger and K. Mkrtchyan, “Restrictions forn-Point Vertices in Higher-Spin Theories,” JHEP06(2020), 118; [1912.13476]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Massless higher spin cubic vertices in flat four dimensional space,

    M. V. Khabarov and Y. M. Zinoviev, “Massless higher spin cubic vertices in flat four dimensional space,” JHEP08(2020), 112; [2005.09851]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    On special quartic interaction of higher spin gauge fields with scalars and gauge symmetry commutator in the linear approximation,

    M. Karapetyan, R. Manvelyan and G. Poghosyan, “On special quartic interaction of higher spin gauge fields with scalars and gauge symmetry commutator in the linear approximation,” Nucl. Phys. B971(2021), 115512; [2104.09139]

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations,” JETP Lett.12(1970), 381

    1970

  53. [61]

    Conformal symmetry and three-point functions,

    E. J. Schreier, “Conformal symmetry and three-point functions,” Phys. Rev. D3 (1971), 980

    1971

  54. [62]

    Conformal invariance and bootstrap,

    A. A. Migdal, “Conformal invariance and bootstrap,” Phys. Lett. B37(1971), 386

    1971

  55. [63]

    Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo and R. Gatto, “Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion,” Annals Phys.76(1973), 161

    1973

  56. [64]

    Field representations of the conformal group with continuous mass spectrum,

    W. R¨ uhl, “Field representations of the conformal group with continuous mass spectrum,” Commun. Math. Phys.30(1973), 287

    1973

  57. [65]

    On conformal invariance of interacting fields,

    W. R¨ uhl, “On conformal invariance of interacting fields,” Commun. Math. Phys.34 (1973), 149

    1973

  58. [66]

    The Significance of Conformal Inversion in Quantum Field Theory,

    K. Koller, “The Significance of Conformal Inversion in Quantum Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.40, 15; DESY-74-8

  59. [67]

    Convergence of Operator Product Expansions on the Vacuum in Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory,

    G. Mack, “Convergence of Operator Product Expansions on the Vacuum in Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.53(1977), 155

    1977

  60. [68]

    Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,

    H. Osborn and A. C. Petkou, “Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,” Annals Phys.231(1994), 311; [hep-th/9307010]

    1994 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Implications of conformal invariance for quantum field theories in d>2,

    H. Osborn, “Implications of conformal invariance for quantum field theories in d>2,” [hep-th/9312176]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Conserved currents and the energy momentum tensor in conformally invariant theories for general dimensions,

    J. Erdmenger and H. Osborn, “Conserved currents and the energy momentum tensor in conformally invariant theories for general dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B483(1997), 431; [hep-th/9605009]

    1997 arXiv

  63. [71]

    N=1 superconformal symmetry in four-dimensions,

    J. H. Park, “N=1 superconformal symmetry in four-dimensions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13(1998), 1743; [hep-th/9703191]. – 26 –

    1998 arXiv

  64. [72]

    N=1 superconformal symmetry in four-dimensional quantum field theory,

    H. Osborn, “N=1 superconformal symmetry in four-dimensional quantum field theory,” Annals Phys.272(1999), 243; [hep-th/9808041]

    1999 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Superconformal symmetry and correlation functions,

    J. H. Park, “Superconformal symmetry and correlation functions,” Nucl. Phys. B559 (1999), 455; [hep-th/9903230]

    1999 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Higher spin current multiplets in operator product expansions,

    D. Anselmi, “Higher spin current multiplets in operator product expansions,” Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000), 1383; [hep-th/9906167]

    2000 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Correlation functions of conserved currents in N=2 superconformal theory,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Correlation functions of conserved currents in N=2 superconformal theory,” Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000), 665; [hep-th/9907107]

    2000 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Superconformal symmetry in three-dimensions,

    J. H. Park, “Superconformal symmetry in three-dimensions,” J. Math. Phys.41 (2000), 7129; [hep-th/9910199]

    2000 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions,

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, “Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions,” JHEP09(2010), 115; [0912.3462]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Higher Spins in AdS and Twistorial Holography,

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, “Higher Spins in AdS and Twistorial Holography,” JHEP04 (2011), 086; [1004.3736]

    2011 arXiv

  71. [79]

    A Note on CFT Correlators in Three Dimensions,

    S. Giombi, S. Prakash and X. Yin, “A Note on CFT Correlators in Three Dimensions,” JHEP07(2013), 105; [1104.4317]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Spinning Conformal Correlators,

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, “Spinning Conformal Correlators,” JHEP11(2011), 071; [1107.3554]

    2011 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Spinning Conformal Blocks,

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, “Spinning Conformal Blocks,” JHEP11(2011), 154; [1109.6321]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, “Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,” J. Phys. A46(2013), 214011; [1112.1016]

    2013 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Correlation Functions of Conserved Currents in Four Dimensional Conformal Field Theory,

    Y. S. Stanev, “Correlation Functions of Conserved Currents in Four Dimensional Conformal Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B865(2012), 200; [1206.5639]

    2012 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Conformal field theories with infinitely many conservation laws,

    I. Todorov, “Conformal field theories with infinitely many conservation laws,” J. Math. Phys.54(2013), 022303; [1207.3661]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [85]

    A note on three-point functions of conserved currents,

    A. Zhiboedov, “A note on three-point functions of conserved currents,” [1206.6370]

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry in d=4,

    V. Alba and K. Diab, “Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry in d=4,” [1307.8092]

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    Conformal correlators of mixed-symmetry tensors,

    M. S. Costa and T. Hansen, “Conformal correlators of mixed-symmetry tensors,” JHEP02(2015), 151; [1411.7351]

    2015 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry ind >3 dimensions,

    V. Alba and K. Diab, “Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry ind >3 dimensions,” JHEP03(2016), 044; [1510.02535]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Counting Conformal Correlators,

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Counting Conformal Correlators,” JHEP02 – 27 – (2018), 096; [1612.08987]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,

    E. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories,” JHEP06 (2019), 058; [1811.12333]

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Three-Point Functions of Higher-Spin Supercurrents in 4D N=1N= 1 Superconformal Field Theory,

    E. I. Buchbinder, J. Hutomo and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Three-Point Functions of Higher-Spin Supercurrents in 4D N=1N= 1 Superconformal Field Theory,” Fortsch. Phys.70(2022), 2200133; [2208.07057]

    2022 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Three-point functions of conserved currents in 3D CFT: General formalism for arbitrary spins,

    E. I. Buchbinder and B. J. Stone, “Three-point functions of conserved currents in 3D CFT: General formalism for arbitrary spins,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.4, 046007; [2210.13135]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Three-point functions of conserved currents in 4D CFT: general formalism for arbitrary spins,

    E. I. Buchbinder and B. J. Stone, “Three-point functions of conserved currents in 4D CFT: general formalism for arbitrary spins,” [2307.11435]

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    Karapetyan, R

    M. Karapetyan, R. Manvelyan and K. Mkrtchyan, JHEP03(2024), 161 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)161 [arXiv:2309.05129 [hep-th]]. – 28 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.