pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.17386 · v1 · submitted 2025-05-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Mechanics of three-dimensional micro-architected interpenetrating phase composites

Andrew Y. Chen , Carlos M. Portela This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 14:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords interpenetrating phase compositesarchitected materialsmechanical propertiesenergy absorptionfailure delocalization3D architecturecomposite mechanicsstress distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

A continuous matrix surrounding 3D architected networks distributes stress and delocalizes failure to raise composite strength and energy absorption.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops fabrication routes for centimeter-scale polymer- and carbon-based three-dimensional architected interpenetrating phase composites. Experiments combined with computational models show that the surrounding matrix phase spreads stress throughout the architecture, producing a high-strength and stable overall response. Delocalized failure increases energy dissipation, allowing the composites to reach specific energy absorption values comparable to those of conventional wound fiber tubes. Geometric choices are shown to tune the internal stress state, bridging the performance of traditional composites with the tunability of architected materials.

Core claim

In an interpenetrating phase composite formed by a continuous three-dimensional architected network surrounded by a load-bearing matrix across length scales, the matrix distributes stress effectively. This distribution produces a high-strength, stable mechanical response. Failure becomes delocalized rather than localized, which raises energy dissipation to levels that match those measured in wound fiber tubes. The internal stress state can be adjusted by changing the geometry of the architected phase.

What carries the argument

The interpenetrating phase composite (IPC) structure, a continuous 3D micro-architected network embedded in and surrounded by a load-bearing matrix at all relevant scales.

If this is right

  • The matrix phase produces high-strength and stable mechanical responses through effective stress distribution.
  • Failure delocalization raises energy dissipation to values comparable with wound fiber tubes.
  • Geometric design parameters can be used to tune the stress state inside an architected composite.
  • The approach connects the load-transfer efficiency of traditional composites with the tunability of single-material architected lattices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometry-tuning strategy could be applied to control other properties such as thermal conductivity or electrical percolation once additional phases are introduced.
  • Delocalized failure may translate to improved impact tolerance in lightweight structural components where sudden load drops are undesirable.
  • Validation of the models at larger scales would allow direct use of the geometric parameters to optimize parts for specific loading conditions.

Load-bearing premise

Fabrication consistently produces continuous, defect-free interpenetrating phases at all length scales and the models correctly predict stress distribution and failure without large unaccounted discrepancies.

What would settle it

Fabricated samples that exhibit catastrophic localized failure or specific energy absorption values substantially below model predictions and below those of wound fiber tubes would show that the matrix does not distribute stress or delocalize failure as claimed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17386 by Andrew Y. Chen, Carlos M. Portela.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of carbon-epoxy micro-architected interpenetrating phase composite fabrication by vat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Elastic behavior of architected IPCs. (a) Plotting the normalized effective composite stiffness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representative mechanical behavior of the carbon-epoxy composite in uniaxial compression. Un [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sequential X-ray computed tomography of composite samples under increasing macroscopic strain, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ashby plot of energy absorption capacity versus material density for single-material and composite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Architecting a stress state in a composite using geometry. Panel (a)(i) shows an “ordinary”, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Composite materials are used across engineering applications for their superior mechanical performance, a result of efficient load transfer between the structure and matrix phases. However, the inherently two-dimensional structure of laminated composites reduces their robustness to shear and out-of-plane loads, while unpredictable interlaminar failure and fiber pull-out can cause a catastrophic loss of load capacity. Meanwhile, advances toward uncovering structure-property relations in architected materials have led to highly tunable mechanical properties, deformation, and even failure. Some of these architected materials have reached near-theoretical limits; however, the majority of current work focuses on describing the response of a single-material network in air, and the effect of adding a load-bearing second phase to a three-dimensional architecture is not well understood. Here, we develop facile fabrication methods for realizing centimeter-scale polymer- and carbon-based architected interpenetrating phase composite (IPC) materials, i.e., two-phase materials consisting of a continuous 3D architecture surrounded by a load-bearing matrix across length scales, and determine the effect of geometry and constituent material properties on the mechanics of these architected IPCs. Using these experiments together with computational models, we show that the matrix phase distributes stress effectively, resulting in a high-strength, stable response. Notably, failure delocalization enhances energy dissipation of the composite, achieving specific energy absorption (SEA) values comparable to those of wound fiber tubes. Finally, we demonstrate that the stress state in an IPC can be tuned using geometric design and introduce an example in an architected composite. Altogether, this work bridges the gap between mechanically efficient composites and tunable architected materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops facile fabrication methods for centimeter-scale polymer- and carbon-based three-dimensional micro-architected interpenetrating phase composites (IPCs). Using experiments combined with computational models, it claims that the matrix phase distributes stress effectively to produce a high-strength, stable response; that failure delocalization enhances energy dissipation, yielding specific energy absorption (SEA) values comparable to those of wound fiber tubes; and that the stress state can be tuned via geometric design.

Significance. If the central claims hold after validation, the work meaningfully bridges architected materials and load-bearing composites by demonstrating how a continuous matrix phase can delocalize failure and improve energy absorption in 3D architectures. The reported SEA comparability to established wound-fiber benchmarks and the geometric tunability of stress state would constitute a useful design advance for robust, high-dissipation materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Computational modeling section] Computational modeling section (near the discussion of stress distribution and failure paths): the models are invoked to support the central claim that the matrix distributes stress and produces delocalized failure. However, the description indicates use of idealized geometries with perfect bonding; no quantitative comparison to experimental interface behavior, crack paths, or strain fields is shown to confirm that fabrication-induced voids or imperfect phase continuity do not alter the predicted load transfer. This assumption is load-bearing for the SEA and delocalization conclusions.
  2. [Results section on SEA values] Results section on SEA values: the claim that IPC SEA matches wound fiber tubes is central to the significance statement, yet the manuscript provides no tabulated numerical values, error bars, specimen dimensions, or direct baseline comparisons that would allow assessment of the quantitative match or statistical robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] The abstract states that 'facile fabrication methods' are developed, but the main text should include a brief discussion of yield, defect statistics, and scalability limits at the reported length scales to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for experimental and simulated stress fields should explicitly state the boundary conditions, mesh convergence criteria, and any assumed interface properties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped us identify opportunities to strengthen the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Computational modeling section] Computational modeling section (near the discussion of stress distribution and failure paths): the models are invoked to support the central claim that the matrix distributes stress and produces delocalized failure. However, the description indicates use of idealized geometries with perfect bonding; no quantitative comparison to experimental interface behavior, crack paths, or strain fields is shown to confirm that fabrication-induced voids or imperfect phase continuity do not alter the predicted load transfer. This assumption is load-bearing for the SEA and delocalization conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that the computational models rely on idealized geometries and perfect bonding, and that a more explicit validation against experimental data would strengthen the support for our claims regarding stress distribution and failure delocalization. The models were intentionally simplified to isolate the role of architecture and phase continuity. Our experimental results show consistent qualitative agreement in terms of stable load response and distributed cracking. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the limitations of the perfect-bonding assumption, including potential effects of fabrication-induced voids, and provide side-by-side qualitative comparisons of simulated failure paths with post-mortem experimental images and any available strain-field data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section on SEA values] Results section on SEA values: the claim that IPC SEA matches wound fiber tubes is central to the significance statement, yet the manuscript provides no tabulated numerical values, error bars, specimen dimensions, or direct baseline comparisons that would allow assessment of the quantitative match or statistical robustness.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation of specific energy absorption (SEA) results lacks the tabulated numerical detail needed for full assessment. In the revised manuscript, we will insert a new table that reports mean SEA values with standard deviations, the number of tested specimens, specimen dimensions, and direct numerical comparisons to representative literature values for wound-fiber tubes, including the corresponding references. This addition will allow readers to evaluate the quantitative match and statistical robustness of the claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on new experiments and models

full rationale

The paper develops fabrication methods for 3D architected IPCs, performs mechanical testing, and uses computational models to show matrix-induced stress distribution and failure delocalization leading to high SEA. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, nor does any central result derive from a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks of fabrication and simulation fidelity, with claims grounded in direct observation rather than internal redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted; the work relies on standard assumptions in materials fabrication and modeling that are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5821 in / 1199 out tokens · 47296 ms · 2026-05-19T14:19:42.344177+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Garcia, B

    E. Garcia, B. Wardle, A. J. Hart, N. Yamamoto, Fabrication and multifunctional prop- erties of a hybrid laminate with aligned carbon nanotubes grown in situ, Composites Sci- ence and Technology 68 (9) (2008) 2034–2041. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.028. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.028 2008

  2. [2]

    R. J. D’Mello, A. M. Waas, Inplane crush response and energy absorption of circu- lar cell honeycomb filled with elastomer, Composite Structures 106 (2013) 491–501. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.054. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.054

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.054 2013

  3. [3]

    Han, Z.-J

    B. Han, Z.-J. Zhang, Q.-C. Zhang, Q. Zhang, T. J. Lu, B.-H. Lu, Recent advances in hybrid lattice-cored sandwiches for enhanced multifunctional performance, Extreme Mechanics Letters 10 (2017) 58–69. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2016.11.009. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.11.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eml.2016.11.009 2017

  4. [4]

    M. R. Wisnom, S. R. Hallett, The role of delamination in strength, failure mech- anism and hole size effect in open hole tensile tests on quasi-isotropic laminates, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 40 (4) (2009) 335–342. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.013. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.013 2009

  5. [5]

    Xiong, A

    J. Xiong, A. Vaziri, R. Ghosh, H. Hu, L. Ma, L. Wu, Compression behavior and en- ergy absorption of carbon fiber reinforced composite sandwich panels made of three- dimensional honeycomb grid cores, Extreme Mechanics Letters 7 (2016) 114–120. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.012. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.012 2016

  6. [6]

    N. A. Fleck, V. S. Deshpande, M. F. Ashby, Micro-architectured materials: past, present and future, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466 (2121) (2010) 2495–2516. doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0215. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2010.0215

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0215 2010

  7. [7]

    Crook, J

    C. Crook, J. Bauer, A. Guell Izard, C. Santos de Oliveira, J. Martins de Souza e Silva, J. B. Berger, L. Valdevit, Plate-nanolattices at the theoretical limit of stiffness and strength, Nature Communications 11 (1) (2020) 1579. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15434-2. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15434-2 http://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15434-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15434-2 2020

  8. [8]

    Bauer, A

    J. Bauer, A. Schroer, R. Schwaiger, O. Kraft, Approaching theoretical strength in glassy carbon nanolattices, Nature Materials 15 (4) (2016) 438–443. doi:10.1038/nmat4561. URLhttp://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nmat4561 http://www.nature.com/articles/nmat4561

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4561 2016

  9. [9]

    Guell Izard, J

    A. Guell Izard, J. Bauer, C. Crook, V. Turlo, L. Valdevit, Ultrahigh energy absorption multifunctional spinodal nanoarchitectures, Small 15 (45) (Sep. 2019). 33 doi:10.1002/smll.201903834. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.201903834

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.201903834 2019

  10. [10]

    L. R. Meza, S. Das, J. R. Greer, Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices, Science 345 (6202) (2014) 1322–1326. doi:10.1126/science.1255908. URLhttp://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1255908

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1255908 2014

  11. [11]

    Bauer, L

    J. Bauer, L. R. Meza, T. A. Schaedler, R. Schwaiger, X. Zheng, L. Valdevit, Nanolat- tices: An emerging class of mechanical metamaterials, Advanced Materials 29 (40) (Sep. 2017). doi:10.1002/adma.201701850. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701850

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201701850 2017

  12. [12]

    Zheng, W

    X. Zheng, W. Smith, J. Jackson, B. Moran, H. Cui, D. Chen, J. Ye, N. Fang, N. Ro- driguez, T. Weisgraber, C. M. Spadaccini, Multiscale metallic metamaterials, Nature Materials 15 (10) (2016) 1100–1106. doi:10.1038/nmat4694. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4694

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4694 2016

  13. [13]

    A. J. D. Shaikeea, H. Cui, M. O’Masta, X. R. Zheng, V. S. Deshpande, The toughness of mechanical metamaterials, Nature Materials 21 (3) (2022) 297–304. doi:10.1038/s41563- 021-01182-1. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01182-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563- 2022

  14. [14]

    Serles, J

    P. Serles, J. Yeo, M. Hach´ e, P. G. Demingos, J. Kong, P. Kiefer, S. Dhulipala, B. Kumral, K. Jia, S. Yang, T. Feng, C. Jia, P. M. Ajayan, C. M. Portela, M. We- gener, J. Howe, C. V. Singh, Y. Zou, S. Ryu, T. Filleter, Ultrahigh specific strength by bayesian optimization of carbon nanolattices, Advanced Materials (Jan. 2025). doi:10.1002/adma.202410651. ...

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202410651 2025

  15. [15]

    Scida, A micromechanics model for 3d elasticity and failure of woven-fibre composite materials, Composites Science and Technology 59 (4) (1999) 505–517

    D. Scida, A micromechanics model for 3d elasticity and failure of woven-fibre composite materials, Composites Science and Technology 59 (4) (1999) 505–517. doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00096-7. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00096-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00096-7 1999

  16. [16]

    L. R. Meza, J. M. Schormans, J. J. Remmers, V. S. Deshpande, Shear response of 3d non-woven carbon fibre reinforced composites, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 125 (2019) 276–297. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2018.12.019. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.12.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2018.12.019 2019

  17. [17]

    Wegner, L

    L. Wegner, L. Gibson, The mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites – i: modelling, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 42 (5) (2000) 925–942. doi:10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00025-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00025-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00025-9 2000

  18. [18]

    Seetoh, K

    I. Seetoh, K. Markandan, C. Q. Lai, Effect of reinforcement bending on the elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites, Mechanics of Materials 136 (2019) 103071. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103071. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103071 34

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103071 2019

  19. [20]

    T. Li, Y. Chen, L. Wang, Enhanced fracture toughness in architected interpenetrating phase composites by 3d printing, Composites Science and Technology 167 (2018) 251–

    work page 2018

  20. [21]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.009

    doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.009. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.009 2018

  21. [22]

    Al-Ketan, M

    O. Al-Ketan, M. A. Assad, R. K. A. Al-Rub, Mechanical properties of periodic interpen- etrating phase composites with novel architected microstructures, Composite Structures 176 (2017) 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.026. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.026 2017

  22. [23]

    Carlsson, A

    J. Carlsson, A. Kuswoyo, A. Shaikeea, N. Fleck, Compression of filled, open- cell, 3d-printed kelvin lattices, Mechanics of Materials 188 (2024) 104851. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104851. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104851

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104851 2024

  23. [24]

    X. Wang, Z. Li, J. Deng, T. Gao, K. Zeng, X. Guo, X. Li, W. Zhai, Z. Wang, Unprecedented strength enhancement observed in interpenetrating phase compos- ites of aperiodic lattice metamaterials, Advanced Functional Materials (Jul. 2024). doi:10.1002/adfm.202406890. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202406890

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202406890 2024

  24. [25]

    Singh, O

    A. Singh, O. Al-Ketan, N. Karathanasopoulos, Mechanical performance of solid and sheet network-based stochastic interpenetrating phase composite materials, Composites Part B: Engineering 251 (2023) 110478. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110478. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110478

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110478 2023

  25. [26]

    R. Raj, A. Kumar, J.-Y. Jeng, Additive manufacturing of biphasic architectured struc- ture and analysis of its mechanical and functional response, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (Oct. 2024). doi:10.1007/s00170-024-14587-4. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14587-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00170-024-14587-4 2024

  26. [27]

    C. Fox, T. Magrini, C. Daraio, Fracture characterization of bioinspired irregular network reinforced composites (2024). arXiv:2410.09061. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09061

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [28]

    Singh, O

    A. Singh, O. Al-Ketan, N. Karathanasopoulos, Highly strain-rate sensitive and duc- tile composite materials combining soft with stiff tpms polymer-based interpenetrating phases, Composite Structures 328 (2024) 117646. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117646. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117646

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117646 2024

  28. [29]

    Sharma, C

    S. Sharma, C. N. Shyam Kumar, J. G. Korvink, C. K¨ ubel, Evolution of glassy carbon microstructure: In situ transmission electron microscopy of the pyrolysis process, Sci- entific Reports 8 (1) (Nov. 2018). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34644-9. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34644-9 35

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34644-9 2018

  29. [30]

    V. S. Deshpande, M. F. Ashby, N. A. Fleck, Foam topology: Bending versus stretching dominated architectures, Acta Materialia 49 (6) (2001) 1035–1040. doi:10.1016/S1359- 6454(00)00379-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359- 2001

  30. [31]

    N. A. Fleck, An overview of the mechanical properties of foams and periodic lattice materials, Cellular Metals and Polymers 2004 (8585858585) (2004) 1–4

    work page 2004

  31. [32]

    M. F. Ashby, The properties of foams and lattices., Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 364 (1838) (2006) 15–30. doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1678. URLhttp://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rsta.2005.1678

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1678 2006

  32. [33]

    L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878326

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139878326 1999

  33. [34]

    C. M. Portela, J. R. Greer, D. M. Kochmann, Impact of node geometry on the effective stiffness of non-slender three-dimensional truss lattice architectures, Extreme Mechanics Letters 22 (2018) 138–148. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2018.06.004. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2018.06.004 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352431618300725

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eml.2018.06.004 2018

  34. [35]

    L. R. Meza, G. P. Phlipot, C. M. Portela, A. Maggi, L. C. Montemayor, A. Comella, D. M. Kochmann, J. R. Greer, Reexamining the mechanical property space of three-dimensional lattice architectures, Acta Materialia 140 (2017) 424–432. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.052. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.052 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrie...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.052 2017

  35. [36]

    Q. Ma, Z. Yan, L. Zhang, M. Y. Wang, The family of elastically isotropic stretching- dominated cubic truss lattices, International Journal of Solids and Structures 239–240 (2022) 111451. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111451. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111451

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111451 2022

  36. [37]

    Pellegrino, C

    S. Pellegrino, C. R. Calladine, Matrix Analysis of Statically and Kinematically Inde- ternimate Frameworks, International Journal of Solids and Structures 22 (4) (1986) 409–428

    work page 1986

  37. [38]

    Weaire, Kelvin's ideal foam structure, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 158 (2009) 012005

    D. Weaire, Kelvin's ideal foam structure, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 158 (2009) 012005. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/158/1/012005. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/158/1/012005

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/158/1/012005 2009

  38. [39]

    A. Y. Chen, A. Chen, A. Fitzhugh, A. Hartman, P. Kaiser, I. Nwaogwugwu, J. Zeng, G. X. Gu, Multi jet fusion printed lattice materials: characterization and prediction of mechanical performance, Materials Advances 4 (4) (2023) 1030–1040. doi:10.1039/d2ma00972b. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2MA00972B 36

    work page doi:10.1039/d2ma00972b 2023

  39. [40]

    E. Wang, C. Chen, G. Zhang, Q. Luo, Q. Li, G. Sun, Multiaxial mechanical charac- terization of additively manufactured open-cell kelvin foams, Composite Structures 305 (2023) 116505. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116505. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116505

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116505 2023

  40. [41]

    Zhang, P

    I. Arretche, K. H. Matlack, On the interrelationship between static and vibration mit- igation properties of architected metastructures, Frontiers in Materials 5 (Nov. 2018). doi:10.3389/fmats.2018.00068. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2018.00068

    work page doi:10.3389/fmats.2018.00068 2018

  41. [42]

    Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Li, H. Gao, X. Li, Achieving the theoretical limit of strength in shell-based carbon nanolattices, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (34) (Aug. 2022). doi:10.1073/pnas.2119536119. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119536119

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2119536119 2022

  42. [43]

    Zhang, A

    X. Zhang, A. Vyatskikh, H. Gao, J. R. Greer, X. Li, Lightweight, flaw-tolerant, and ultrastrong nanoarchitected carbon, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (14) (2019) 6665–6672. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817309116. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817309116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1817309116 2019

  43. [44]

    B. C. White, A. Garland, R. Alberdi, B. L. Boyce, Interpenetrating lattices with enhanced mechanical functionality, Additive Manufacturing 38 (2021) 101741. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101741. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101741

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101741 2021

  44. [45]

    S. Das, K. Kandan, S. Kazemahvazi, H. Wadley, V. Deshpande, Compressive response of a 3d non-woven carbon-fibre composite, International Journal of Solids and Structures 136–137 (2018) 137–149. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.011. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.011 2018

  45. [46]

    Zhang, M.-T

    Y. Zhang, M.-T. Hsieh, L. Valdevit, Mechanical performance of 3d printed interpen- etrating phase composites with spinodal topologies, Composite Structures 263 (2021) 113693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113693. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822321001549

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113693 2021

  46. [47]

    Rezapourian, I

    M. Rezapourian, I. Jasiuk, M. Saarna, I. Hussainova, Selective laser melted ti6al4v split-p tpms lattices for bone tissue engineering, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 251 (2023) 108353. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108353. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108353

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108353 2023

  47. [48]

    Tancogne-Dejean, X

    T. Tancogne-Dejean, X. Li, M. Diamantopoulou, C. C. Roth, D. Mohr, High strain rate response of additively-manufactured plate-lattices: Experiments and modeling, Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials 5 (3) (2019) 361–375. doi:10.1007/s40870-019-00219- 6. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40870-019-00219-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s40870-019-00219- 2019

  48. [49]

    Y. Ren, Y. Nie, W. Ran, Z. Liu, L. Wang, C. Lou, W. Chen, Mechanical proper- ties and energy absorption of soft–hard dual phase lattice structures manufactured 37 via selective laser melting, Metals and Materials International 30 (2) (2023) 303–314. doi:10.1007/s12540-023-01502-x. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12540-023-01502-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s12540-023-01502-x 2023

  49. [50]

    H. Lei, C. Li, J. Meng, H. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, P. Wang, D. Fang, Evaluation of compressive properties of slm-fabricated multi-layer lattice structures by experimental test andµ-ct-based finite element analysis, Materials & Design 169 (2019) 107685. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107685. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107685

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107685 2019

  50. [51]

    Alvandi-Tabrizi, A

    Y. Alvandi-Tabrizi, A. Rabiei, Use of composite metal foam for improving absorption of collision forces, Procedia Materials Science 4 (2014) 377–382. doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.577. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.577

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.577 2014

  51. [52]

    Wendy Gu, J

    X. Wendy Gu, J. R. Greer, Ultra-strong architected cu meso-lattices, Extreme Mechan- ics Letters 2 (2015) 7–14. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2015.01.006. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2015.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eml.2015.01.006 2015

  52. [53]

    Kumar, J

    S. Kumar, J. Ubaid, R. Abishera, A. Schiffer, V. S. Deshpande, Tunable en- ergy absorption characteristics of architected honeycombs enabled via additive manufacturing, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 11 (45) (2019) 42549–42560. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b12880. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12880

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.9b12880 2019

  53. [54]

    A. Kudo, K. Kanamaru, J. Han, R. Tang, K. Kisu, T. Yoshii, S. Orimo, H. Nishi- hara, M. Chen, Stereolithography 3d printed carbon microlattices with hierarchi- cal porosity for structural and functional applications, Small 19 (47) (Aug. 2023). doi:10.1002/smll.202301525. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.202301525

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.202301525 2023

  54. [55]

    Z. Ye, B. Zhao, Q. Wang, K. Chen, M. Su, Z. Xia, L. Han, M. Li, X. Kong, Y. Shang, J. Liang, A. Cao, Crack-induced superelastic, strength-tunable car- bon nanotube sponges, Advanced Functional Materials 33 (44) (Jun. 2023). doi:10.1002/adfm.202303475. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202303475

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202303475 2023

  55. [56]

    Hsieh, C

    M.-T. Hsieh, C. S. Ha, Z. Xu, S. Kim, H. F. Wu, V. Kunc, X. Zheng, Stiff and strong, lightweight bi-material sandwich plate-lattices with enhanced energy absorption, Jour- nal of Materials Research 36 (18) (2021) 3628–3641. doi:10.1557/s43578-021-00322-2. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00322-2

    work page doi:10.1557/s43578-021-00322-2 2021

  56. [57]

    X. Wang, X. Li, Z. Li, Z. Wang, W. Zhai, Superior strength, toughness, and damage- tolerance observed in microlattices of aperiodic unit cells, Small 20 (23) (Jan. 2024). doi:10.1002/smll.202307369. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.202307369 38

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.202307369 2024

  57. [58]

    N. K. Choudhry, B. Panda, S. Kumar, Enhanced energy absorption performance of 3d printed 2d auxetic lattices, Thin-Walled Structures 186 (2023) 110650. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2023.110650. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.110650

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tws.2023.110650 2023

  58. [59]

    G. L. Farley, Relationship Between Mechanical-Property and Energy-Absorption Trends for Composite Tubes, NASA Langley Technical Report Server, 1999

    work page 1999

  59. [60]

    Masters, K

    I. Masters, K. Evans, Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs, Composite Structures 35 (4) (1996) 403–422. doi:10.1016/s0263-8223(96)00054-2. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0263-8223(96)00054-2 1996

  60. [61]

    K. E. Evans, A. Alderson, Auxetic materials: Functional materials and structures from lateral thinking!, Advanced Materials 12 (9) (2000) 617–628. doi:10.1002/(sici)1521- 4095(200005)12:9¡617::aid-adma617¿3.0.co;2-3. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521- 2000

  61. [62]

    R. C. Huang, L. Anand, Non-linear mechanical behavior of the elastomer polydimethyl- siloxane (pdms) used in the manufacture of microfluidic devices, 2005. URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7456

    work page 2005

  62. [63]

    Anand, K

    L. Anand, K. Kamrin, S. Govindjee, Introduction to Mechanics of Solid Materials, Oxford University Press, 2022. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866073.001.0001. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192866073.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780192866073.001.0001 2022

  63. [64]

    Oliver, G

    W. Oliver, G. Pharr, An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic mod- ulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments, Journal of Materials Research 7 (6) (1992) 1564–1583. doi:10.1557/jmr.1992.1564. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.1992.1564 1992

  64. [65]

    Y. M. Eggeler, K. C. Chan, Q. Sun, A. D. Lantada, D. Mager, R. Schwaiger, P. Gumbsch, R. Schr¨ oder, W. Wenzel, J. G. Korvink, M. Islam, A review on 3d architected pyrolytic carbon produced by additive micro/nanomanufacturing, Advanced Functional Materials 34 (20) (Jun. 2023). doi:10.1002/adfm.202302068. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202302068

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202302068 2023

  65. [66]

    M. F. Ashby, D. R. Jones, Mechanical Properties of Polymers, Elsevier, 2013, p. 419–440. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-096668-7.00025-5. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096668-7.00025-5

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-096668-7.00025-5 2013

  66. [67]

    doi:10.1520/d0695-15

    ASTM D695-15, Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015. doi:10.1520/d0695-15. URLwww.astm.org

    work page doi:10.1520/d0695-15 2015

  67. [68]

    Danielsson, D

    M. Danielsson, D. Parks, M. Boyce, Three-dimensional micromechanical modeling of voided polymeric materials, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 50 (2) (2002) 351–379. doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(01)00060-6. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00060-6 39

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(01)00060-6 2002

  68. [69]

    Okereke, A

    M. Okereke, A. Akpoyomare, A virtual framework for prediction of full-field elastic response of unidirectional composites, Computational Materials Science 70 (2013) 82–

    work page 2013

  69. [70]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.036

    doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.036. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.036 2012

  70. [71]

    Sadezky, H

    A. Sadezky, H. Muckenhuber, H. Grothe, R. Niessner, U. P¨ oschl, Raman microspec- troscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials: Spectral analysis and structural information, Carbon 43 (8) (2005) 1731–1742. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 2005

  71. [72]

    L. Gong, S. Kyriakides, Compressive response of open cell foams part ii: Initiation and evolution of crushing, International Journal of Solids and Structures 42 (5–6) (2005) 1381–1399. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.024. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.024 2005

  72. [73]

    Kucherov, M

    L. Kucherov, M. Ryvkin, Fracture toughness of open-cell kelvin foam, International Journal of Solids and Structures 51 (2) (2014) 440–448. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.015. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.015 40

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.015 2014