REVIEW 2 cited by
Simulating Macroeconomic Expectations in Survey Experiments with LLM-based Economic Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a framework for simulating macroeconomic expectations in survey experiments using LLM-based economic agents (LLM Agents). We construct LLM Agents equipped with several functional modules that retrieve personal characteristics, prior expectations, and dynamic external information. We validate our framework by recapitulating three representative survey designs covering various expectations across different types of respondents. Our results show that LLM Agents generate expectation distributions highly similar to human data and capture human-aligned qualitative patterns in open-ended responses. Evaluation reveals that priors are crucial for matching distributions, whereas personal and external information drive human-like thought processes. Our findings offer guidance for narrowing the belief gap between generative AI and humans at the aggregate level while delineating the boundaries of the framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Uncovering Salience-Driven Dynamics in Consumer Confidence with Generative Social Simulation
ConsumerSim reconstructs official CCI series from synthetic populations and multi-source signals, outperforming baselines on reconstruction metrics and aiding short-horizon activity predictions.
-
OpenHospital: A Thing-in-itself Arena for Evolving and Benchmarking LLM-based Collective Intelligence
OpenHospital is an interactive physician-patient multi-agent arena that improves clinical metrics via ground-truth reflection and reports cooperative behaviors as evidence of evolving LLM collective intelligence.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.