Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Inflaton Dynamics in Higher-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Four-derivative scalar-tensor corrections leave inflation's response to large inhomogeneities essentially unchanged, except for a tilted effective potential and an accumulated kinetic-term effect.

desk verdict A careful, well-scoped numerical study whose abstract overstates its own more honest caveat, especially regarding the g2 term; deserves review with revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17986 v2 pith:IILJXIDI submitted 2025-05-23 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

Sam E. Brady , Katy Clough , Pau Figueras , Áron D. Kovács This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO MSC 83F0583D0583-08
keywords inflationarycosmologynumericalrelativityscalar-tensorgravityEinstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnethigher-derivativeeffectivefieldtheoryweakcouplingconditioninhomogeneousinitialconditionsplateaupotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Inflation is only a solution to the homogeneity problem if it can start from large inhomogeneities, yet the curvature scales involved may be high enough that higher-derivative gravitational terms become relevant. This paper studies the simplest such setting, in which the same scalar field drives inflation and supplies the extra degree of freedom of a four-derivative scalar-tensor theory, under two restrictions: inflation must still work in the homogeneous limit, and the initial data must lie in the weak-coupling regime where the effective theory is valid. Its central finding is that, within that regime, large perturbations decay almost exactly as they do in general relativity, with the Gauss-Bonnet correction showing up mainly as a tilt of the effective potential that changes the number of e-folds. It also finds that evolution can push the field out of the weak-coupling regime only through fine tuning, and that the four-derivative kinetic term has a small but potentially observable integrated effect on the final perturbation amplitude. If correct, this tells the community which higher-derivative effects genuinely alter inflationary dynamics and which are absorbed into an effective potential, providing a baseline for less restricted models.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the combination of a homogeneous-limit effective potential with a weak-coupling criterion. In FLRW symmetry the Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet terms reduce the field equations to ODEs whose scalar equation is that of the original potential plus a correction $-24\lambda'(\phi)(\dot H H^2+H^4)$; integrating this with a linear coupling $\lambda(\phi)=\lambda\phi$ gives the effective potential $\mathcal{V}_{\mathrm{eff}}$, so the homogeneous imprint of the correction is a tilt of the plateau. The weak-coupling condition $L^{-1}\sqrt{|\lambda'(\phi)|}\ll 1$, where $L^{-1}$ is the maximum of the curvature, field-gradient, second-derivative and potential scales, serves as the operational boundary of the effective theory and is monitored throughout the evolution. Initial data are cosinusoidal perturbations $\phi=\phi_0+(\Delta\phi/3)(\cos kx+\cos ky+\cos kz)$ with $N$ modes per Hubble radius, and the claim is that while these gradients decay the system follows the GR dynamics with the tilted potential; only when gradients temporarily grow does the Gauss-Bonnet contribution become large enough to matter.

What would settle it

Run the paper's largest allowed perturbation case—$\mu=0.1\,\mathrm{Pl}$, $\phi_0=-1.06\,\mathrm{Pl}$, $\Delta\phi/\phi_0\lesssim0.6$, $N=2$ modes per Hubble radius, $\Lambda^4\lambda=0.03$—and compare the decay of $\phi_{\max}-\phi_{\min}$ with the $\lambda=0$ run; if the Gauss-Bonnet contribution to $\partial_t^2\phi$ grows to order one while Eq. (10) is still satisfied, or if the perturbation decay rate differs from the effective-potential prediction by more than the numerical error, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, in its restricted single-scalar case, the non-linear dynamics of large perturbations during inflation are very similar to general relativity, with the main deviations captured by the homogeneous Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet terms. Concretely, spatial gradients that source the new terms decay in the first few e-folds, GR dynamics dominate the homogenisation, and the Gauss-Bonnet coupling acts through an effective potential $\mathcal{V}_{\mathrm{eff}}(\phi)=V(\phi)-24\lambda(\phi)(\dot H H^2+H^4)$ that tilts the inflaton plateau and changes how many e-folds occur. The exception is the four-derivative kinetic term $g_2 X^2$: although it stays subdominant at each instant, its integrated effect increases the frozen amplitude of the scalar perturbation, making the model less robust to large initial inhomogeneities, and negative $g_2$ leads to a rapid breakdown of the evolution. The paper also claims that leaving the weak-coupling regime dynamically is possible in principle but requires the coupling and perturbation size to be very finely tuned, so it is unlikely to happen generically.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the weak-coupling measure, which compares the scalar-Gauss-Bonnet coupling scale with the largest of the curvature, field-gradient, second-derivative, and potential scales, correctly marks where the effective theory is valid; if the real validity boundary is set by accumulated subleading effects or by some other criterion, the conclusion that higher-derivative terms stay small could miss physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Simulations of large inflationary perturbations in any model satisfying the two restrictions should look like the corresponding general-relativity simulations with a tilted effective potential, so existing GR robustness results transfer with adjusted e-fold counts.
  • The number of e-folds is highly sensitive to the Gauss-Bonnet coupling, since even a small $\lambda$ changes the slope of the effective potential; observational consistency therefore constrains the allowed coupling tightly.
  • Initial data near the weak-coupling boundary can be driven out of the effective-theory regime during evolution, and this shows up as a breakdown of the numerical scheme; such cases require fine tuning and are not generic.
  • The four-derivative kinetic term $g_2 X^2$ can reduce robustness even while remaining subdominant at every time, because its accumulated effect changes the amplitude that freezes out and later re-enters the horizon; negative $g_2$ makes the evolution break down quickly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the true validity boundary of the effective theory is stricter than the paper's weak-coupling measure, it may be set by accumulated subleading-operator effects; the paper's own $g_2$ result is evidence that locally small corrections can leave observable imprints over many e-folds.
  • The single-scalar restriction forces the extra degree of freedom to roll monotonically with the inflaton; in the two-scalar case, where the second field is free to have its own gradients, Gauss-Bonnet effects could grow rather than decay, so the GR-like robustness found here may not extend.
  • A quantitative extension would map, for fixed $\lambda$, the boundary in perturbation amplitude and mode number at which the Gauss-Bonnet contribution to $\partial_t^2\phi$ reaches order one while the weak-coupling condition is still satisfied; that map would test how measure-zero the fine-tuned escape from the EFT really is.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses numerical relativity to study whether four-derivative scalar-tensor corrections, specifically a Gauss-Bonnet term and a quartic kinetic term, change the robustness of single-field inflation against large inhomogeneities. Working with the action of Eq. (1), a Starobinsky-type potential, λ(φ) ∝ φ and constant g2, the authors restrict initial data by requiring that the homogeneous limit inflates and that the weak-coupling condition (10) holds. They report that, within these restrictions, large non-linear perturbations behave very similarly to general relativity, with the main deviations captured by the homogeneous Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet effective potential Veff in Eq. (8), and that driving the field out of the weak-coupling regime requires fine tuning. The final section shows that the g2 kinetic term has a non-homogeneous integrated effect on the frozen perturbation amplitude, which is flagged as a caveat in the discussion.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, this is a useful first step in applying recently developed well-posed formulations of four-derivative scalar-tensor theories to inhomogeneous early-universe spacetimes. The paper is careful to restrict its claims to a narrow class of models and initial data, and it ships reproducible numerical tools: the GRFolres/GRChombo codes are referenced, the initial-data solver is described, and Fig. 7 provides convergence tests. The result that inflationary robustness is not strongly affected by the Gauss-Bonnet sector under weak coupling is interesting but exploratory, and the abstract overstates the paper's own g2 findings.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. VI D; Sec. VII] The abstract and Sec. VII claim that 'the main deviations [from GR] are captured by the terms relating to the homogeneous Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet contributions,' but Sec. VI D and Fig. 6 show that the g2 term, which is dropped in the homogeneous reduction of Sec. III and does not enter Veff in Eq. (8), produces an integrated, non-homogeneous effect that changes the final frozen amplitude of the perturbations while remaining subdominant at each time according to the weak-coupling measure. The Discussion lists this as a caveat, but the abstract and the headline conclusion do not carry the qualification. Please revise the central claim so that the g2 sector is either incorporated into the statement or explicitly excluded from it, and ideally quantify how the g2-induced change in the final amplitude compares with the homogeneous EsGB tilt.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (10)-(11)] The weak-coupling measure (10) with the length scale L defined in (11) is load-bearing: the allowed region in Fig. 1, the monitoring of the EFT regime, and the statement that the system 'stays in the EFT regime' are all defined through it. The manuscript does not establish that L^{-1}|λ'(φ)| ≪ 1 is necessary or sufficient for EFT validity or for numerical well-posedness; indeed, the footnote in Sec. IV notes that the homogeneous ODEs remain well-behaved even when Eq. (10) is violated, and Sec. VI D shows integrated physical effects from a term whose instantaneous weak-coupling indicator stays small. Please add a sensitivity check with alternative diagnostics (for example, characteristic speeds, constraint violations, or the magnitude of higher-order operators) and state more precisely the domain of validity of Eq. (10) as an operational marker.
  3. [Secs. V-VI] The central 'very similar to GR' conclusion rests on a narrow family of initial data: conformally flat metrics, vanishing shift and transverse-traceless extrinsic curvature, zero initial scalar momentum, a single cosine mode, and either N=2 (Fig. 3) or N=1 (Fig. 4) modes per Hubble length. Since known GR studies show that momentum perturbations can behave differently, and since the abstract's language ('large perturbations') suggests a broader class, please either add a case with nonzero initial scalar momentum or several modes, or restrict the abstract and conclusions explicitly to the periodic, zero-momentum, single-mode data studied here.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III; Sec. VI D] The statement that g2 is suppressed because its terms are of order ɵφ^2 or higher in the homogeneous limit should be made precise: the integrated effect shown in Fig. 6 implies that this suppression fails at some point in the inhomogeneous regime, and the slow-roll validity conditions for the neglect are not stated.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains the typo 'FLR W' in '(FLR W) Hubble length'; it should be 'FLRW'.
  3. [Appendix A, Fig. 7] The text says the results 'confirm the expected approximate 2nd-4th order convergence,' but the figure caption says 'converge to 2nd order'; please state the measured convergence order quantitatively and explain why the initial-data error dominates.
  4. [Sec. VI D] The weak-coupling condition for g2 is described as Eq. (10) with |λ'(φ)| replaced by |g2(φ)|; because g2 and λ' have different mass dimensions, please write out the corresponding dimensionless L-dependent measure explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the homogeneous-EsGB reduction is derived in-paper from the same action and validated, not fitted; the only self-citation cluster (weak-coupling measure pedigree, Sec. IV) is minor and non-decisive. The abstract's unqualified claim versus the g2 result (Sec. VI D) is a self-flagged consistency issue, not circularity.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV, paragraph after Eq. (11).]
    "We note that the above measure has been employed in previous works studying black hole spacetimes, and is generically successful at predicting where the numerical scheme will break down (see e.g. [51, 62–64, 66])."

    The weak-coupling measure (Eq. 10) operationally defines the EFT-valid, numerically-reliable domain that delimits the entire study (Fig. 1) and supports the central claim that the system 'stays in the EFT regime.' Its reliability is asserted by citing 'previous works' of which [51, 62, 63] are by the present group (Doneva et al.; Aresté Saló, Clough, Figueras), so the measure's predictive success rests partly on the authors' own prior results. This is, however, minor: external work [66] is also cited, the measure is a standard EFT length-scale comparison, and the paper itself discloses a weaker breakdown condition in (nearly) homogeneous spacetimes. The central perturbation-decay results are computed independently in full 3+1 and validated by convergence tests (Fig.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The action (Eq. 1) is reduced in-paper to the homogeneous ODEs (Eqs. 6-7) and the effective potential (Eq. 8); these are consequences of the same action, not inputs dressed as outputs, and they serve two honest purposes: to define the Fig. 1 restrictions (Eq. 9 from the homogeneous limit, Eq. 10 from weak coupling) and to validate the code in the near-homogeneous limit (Fig. 8). No parameter is fitted to simulation output: Lambda is fixed by CMB normalization, mu = 0.1 M_pl is taken from the GR robustness study [16], phi_0 is set to give 100 e-folds in the homogeneous lambda = 0 case, and the '10 e-folds' cutoff is declared arbitrary. The preselection of the allowed region is a stated conditional, not a tautology: whether horizon-scale perturbations decay, freeze out, or drive the system out of weak coupling is computed in full 3+1, and Sec. VI C shows the latter can happen even from weak initial data with fine tuning, while Sec. VI D shows g2 produces an integrated, non-homogeneous change to the frozen amplitude that the homogeneous Veff (which drops the g2 term, Sec. III) does not capture. The fact that the g2 sector escapes the homogeneous-EsGB description demonstrates that the headline claim is not definitionally forced; the abstract's under-qualified wording relative to Sec. VII's caveats is an overstatement, not circularity. Self-citations to the well-posed formulations [43, 48, 49], GRFolres [70], GRTresna [67] and initial-data method [69] count as real evidence: they are analytic proofs, open-source code, and in-paper convergence tests (Fig. 7). The only identifiable self-citation cluster is the weak-coupling measure's pedigree (Sec. IV), documented in the step above and judged minor. Footnote 4's admission that global well-posedness of Eqs. (6)-(7) is not analyzed is an acknowledged limitation, not a circular step. Verdict: no significant circularity; score 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger makes explicit that the paper's conclusion is achieved by selecting a regime, homogeneous inflation success plus weak initial coupling, rather than by discovering that higher-derivative terms are negligible in all regimes. No new entities are introduced; the scalar degree of freedom is the inflaton itself.

free parameters (6)
  • Lambda^4 (inflationary energy scale)
    Introduced in Eq. (4); can be matched to the primordial spectrum but is not fitted in this study. It sets the overall scale and enters the combination Lambda^4 lambda.
  • mu = 0.1 M_pl
    Potential shape parameter in the Starobinsky potential (4); chosen as an intermediate case because the paper notes robustness depends on this scale.
  • phi0 = -1.06 M_pl
    Initial homogeneous field value giving 100 e-folds when lambda=0; used for all perturbed runs and re-tuned in Sec. VI B.
  • Lambda^4 lambda = up to 0.03
    Gauss-Bonnet coupling; scanned subject to the Fig. 1 exclusions from homogeneous inflation success and weak coupling.
  • g2 = varied; negative values break hyperbolicity quickly
    Constant coefficient of the X^2 term; scanned in Sec. VI D up to the weak-coupling threshold.
  • Delta phi / phi0 = up to ~0.6 or reaching the potential minimum
    Initial perturbation amplitude in Eq. (12); values are limited by the weak-coupling condition and integrability.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The action (1) is the complete low-energy four-derivative scalar-tensor theory up to field redefinitions.
    Sec. II; builds on Weinberg's EFT classification [25] and prior well-posedness results [48,49,62-64].
  • domain assumption During slow roll, the g2 X^2 term can be neglected in the homogeneous and isotropic limit.
    Sec. III, statements after Eq. (7); used for the effective potential (8) and e-fold restrictions.
  • ad hoc to paper The weak-coupling inequality (10) with L defined in (11) is the correct operational marker for EFT validity and numerical well-posedness.
    Sec. IV; imported from black hole studies [51,62-64]. The paper itself notes the threshold is weaker for homogeneous cosmologies and treats global well-posedness as beyond scope.
  • domain assumption Conformally flat, zero-momentum, periodic initial data represent the relevant class of large inhomogeneities.
    Sec. V; the authors explicitly note that nonzero scalar momentum requires more work and is left for future studies.
  • domain assumption Inflating spacetimes are close to de Sitter, which is non-linearly stable.
    Sec. I; invoked to explain why perturbations decay and GR dominates; not proven for the four-derivative theory in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inflaton Dynamics in Higher-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IILJXIDI

@misc{pith2026250517986,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inflaton Dynamics in Higher-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IILJXIDI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17986}
}
read the original abstract

During inflation, higher derivative terms in the gravitational action may play a significant role. Building on new stable formulations of four-derivative scalar-tensor theories, we study the impact of these corrections in the case where the inflaton is also the additional scalar degree of freedom of the modified theory. This case is highly restricted by requiring that in the homogeneous limit inflation must still work, and that the initial data must be in the weak coupling limit to respect the validity of the effective theory. In such cases, the non-linear dynamics of large perturbations are very similar to the GR case, with the main deviations captured by the terms relating to the homogeneous Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet contributions. We show that in principle it is possible to dynamically drive the field out of the weak-coupling regime from a starting point well within it, but that to do so one has to finely tune the setup, so such cases are unlikely to occur generically. This work provides a basis for the study of less restricted models in future, for example those in which the inflaton and scalar degree of freedom are independent, or in which one is not restricted to a weakly coupled regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17986 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Restrictions on combinations of the relative initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Top panel: The total number of e-folds of inflation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Plots of the maximum and minimum values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plots of the different contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Plots of the maximum and minimum values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Convergence tests for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Plots of the maximum and minimum values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Primordial black holes forming during kination: the trapped, the overdense, and the void

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In one non-attractor inflation model, initially similar field fluctuations produce three distinct black-hole formation channels—trapped, overdense, void—with collapse thresholds determined by the full density profile,...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solu- tion to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  2. [2]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B 108, 389 (1982)

    1982

  3. [3]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1220 (1982)

    1982

  4. [4]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  5. [5]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 129, 177 (1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Brandenberger and P

    R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems, Found. Phys. 47, 797 (2017), arXiv:1603.05834 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Ijjas and P

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, Bouncing Cosmology made simple, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 135004 (2018), arXiv:1803.01961 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    D. S. Goldwirth and T. Piran, Inhomogeneity and the Onset of Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2852 (1990)

    work page 1990

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    D. S. Goldwirth and T. Piran, Spherical Inhomogeneous Cosmologies and Inflation. 1. Numerical Methods, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3263 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    D. S. Goldwirth and T. Piran, Initial conditions for in- flation, Phys. Rept. 214, 223 (1992)

    1992

  3. [11]

    Laguna, H

    P. Laguna, H. Kurki-Suonio, and R. A. Matzner, Inho- mogeneous inflation: The Initial value problem, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3077 (1991)

    1991

  4. [12]

    Kurki-Suonio, P

    H. Kurki-Suonio, P. Laguna, and R. A. Matzner, Inho- mogeneous inflation: Numerical evolution, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3611 (1993), arXiv:astro-ph/9306009

    1993 arXiv

  5. [13]

    W. E. East, M. Kleban, A. Linde, and L. Senatore, Be- ginning inflation in an inhomogeneous universe, JCAP 09, 010, arXiv:1511.05143 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Clough, E

    K. Clough, E. A. Lim, B. S. DiNunno, W. Fischler, R. Flauger, and S. Paban, Robustness of Inflation to Inhomogeneous Initial Conditions, JCAP 09, 025, arXiv:1608.04408 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Clough, R

    K. Clough, R. Flauger, and E. A. Lim, Robustness of Inflation to Large Tensor Perturbations, JCAP 05, 065, arXiv:1712.07352 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, R. Flauger, and E. A. Lim, The Effects of Potential Shape on Inhomoge- neous Inflation, JCAP 05, 030, arXiv:1910.12547 [astro- ph.CO]

    1910 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Joana and S

    C. Joana and S. Clesse, Inhomogeneous preinflation across Hubble scales in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083501 (2021), arXiv:2011.12190 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. X. Con- straints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Corman and W

    M. Corman and W. E. East, Starting inflation from in- homogeneous initial conditions with momentum, JCAP 10, 046, arXiv:2212.04479 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Elley, J

    M. Elley, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, R. Flauger, P. Giannadakis, and E. A. Lim, Robustness of inflation to kinetic inhomogeneities, (2024), arXiv:2405.03490 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Garfinkle, A

    D. Garfinkle, A. Ijjas, and P. J. Steinhardt, Initial con- ditions problem in cosmological inflation revisited, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138028 (2023), arXiv:2304.12150 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Ijjas, P

    A. Ijjas, P. J. Steinhardt, D. Garfinkle, and W. G. Cook, Smoothing and flattening the universe through slow contraction versus inflation, JCAP 07, 077, arXiv:2404.00867 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Joana, Beginning inflation in conformally curved spacetimes, Phys

    C. Joana, Beginning inflation in conformally curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063534 (2024), arXiv:2406.00811 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and E. A. Lim, Cosmol- ogy using numerical relativity, (2024), arXiv:2409.01939 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123541 (2008), arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Koyama, Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity, Rept

    K. Koyama, Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 046902 (2016), arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P. G. Ferreira, Cosmological Tests of Gravity, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 335 (2019), arXiv:1902.10503 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Baker and I

    T. Baker and I. Harrison, Constraining Scalar- Tensor Modified Gravity with Gravitational Waves and Large Scale Structure Surveys, JCAP 01, 068, arXiv:2007.13791 [astro-ph.CO]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Caravano, K

    A. Caravano, K. Inomata, and S. Renaux-Petel, In- flationary Butterfly Effect: Nonperturbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 151001 (2024), arXiv:2403.12811 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Kanti, J

    P. Kanti, J. Rizos, and K. Tamvakis, Singularity free cos- mological solutions in quadratic gravity, Phys. Rev. D59, 083512 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9806085

    1999 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and M. Sasaki, Gauss-Bonnet dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 71, 123509 (2005), arXiv:hep- th/0504052

    2005

  24. [32]

    Jiang, J.-W

    P.-X. Jiang, J.-W. Hu, and Z.-K. Guo, Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term, Phys. Rev. D88, 123508 (2013), arXiv:1310.5579 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kanti, R

    P. Kanti, R. Gannouji, and N. Dadhich, Gauss- Bonnet Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 92, 041302 (2015), arXiv:1503.01579 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gauss-Bonnet inflation

    G. Hikmawan, J. Soda, A. Suroso, and F. P. Zen, Com- ment on “Gauss-Bonnet inflation”, Phys. Rev. D 93, 068301 (2016), arXiv:1512.00222 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    van de Bruck and C

    C. van de Bruck and C. Longden, Higgs Inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet term in the Jordan Frame, Phys. Rev. D 93, 063519 (2016), arXiv:1512.04768 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Modi- fied Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution, Phys. Rept. 692, 1 (2017), arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Sberna and P

    L. Sberna and P. Pani, Nonsingular solutions and insta- bilities in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 96, 124022 (2017), arXiv:1708.06371 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Z. Yi, Y. Gong, and M. Sabir, Inflation with Gauss- Bonnet coupling, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083521 (2018), arXiv:1804.09116 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Viable Inflation in Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity and Reconstruction from Observational Indices, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044039 (2018), arXiv:1808.05045 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Chakraborty, T

    S. Chakraborty, T. Paul, and S. SenGupta, Inflation 11 driven by Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083539 (2018), arXiv:1804.03004 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fomin, Gauss–Bonnet term corrections in scalar field cosmology, Eur

    I. Fomin, Gauss–Bonnet term corrections in scalar field cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1145 (2020), arXiv:2004.08065 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Friedrich, On the existence ofn-geodesically complete or future complete solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions with smooth asymptotic structure, Commun

    H. Friedrich, On the existence ofn-geodesically complete or future complete solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions with smooth asymptotic structure, Commun. Math. Phys. 107, 587 (1986)

    1986

  35. [43]

    Figueras, A

    P. Figueras, A. Held, and A. D. Kov´ acs, Well-posed ini- tial value formulation of general effective field theories of gravity, (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Z.-K. Guo, N. Ohta, and S. Tsujikawa, Realizing scale- invariant density perturbations in low-energy effective string theory, Phys. Rev. D75, 023520 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0610336

    2007

  37. [45]

    B. M. Leith and I. P. Neupane, Gauss-Bonnet cosmolo- gies: Crossing the phantom divide and the transition from matter dominance to dark energy, JCAP 05, 019, arXiv:hep-th/0702002

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Sberna, Early-universe cosmology in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Master’s thesis, Rome U

    L. Sberna, Early-universe cosmology in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Master’s thesis, Rome U. (2017), arXiv:1708.01150 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, From inflation to re- heating and their dynamical stability analysis in Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101263 (2023), arXiv:2305.19110 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124003 (2020), arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, Well-Posed Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 221101 (2020), arXiv:2003.04327 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    D. D. Doneva, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, and S. S. Yazadjiev, 3+1 nonlinear evolution of Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024040 (2024), arXiv:2404.15526 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    D. D. Doneva, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Testing the limits of scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity through nonlinear evolutions of spin- induced scalarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084017 (2023), arXiv:2307.06474 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Thaalba, N

    F. Thaalba, N. Franchini, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, Hyperbolicity in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: A gauge invariant study for spherical evolution, Phys. Rev. D111, 024053 (2025), arXiv:2410.16264 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Thaalba, N

    F. Thaalba, N. Franchini, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, Dynamics of spherically symmetric black holes in scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity with a Ricci coupling, Phys. Rev. D 111, 064054 (2025), arXiv:2409.11398 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Thaalba, M

    F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spherical collapse in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Tam- ing ill-posedness with a Ricci coupling, Phys. Rev. D109, L041503 (2024), arXiv:2306.01695 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Franchini, M

    N. Franchini, M. Bezares, E. Barausse, and L. Lehner, Fixing the dynamical evolution in scalar-Gauss- Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064061 (2022), arXiv:2206.00014 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Evolution of Einstein- scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity using a modified har- monic formulation, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044040 (2021), arXiv:2011.03547 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Dynamics of Spontaneous Black Hole Scalarization and Mergers in Einstein-Scalar- Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 101102 (2021), arXiv:2105.08571 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Corman and W

    M. Corman and W. E. East, Black hole-neutron star mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084065 (2024), arXiv:2405.18496 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Corman, J

    M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar- Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024014 (2023), arXiv:2210.09235 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Lehner, W. E. East, and G. Dideron, Non- linear studies of modifications to general relativity: Com- paring different approaches, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084048 (2024), arXiv:2405.15581 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Scalarized Black Hole dy- namics in Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 044015 (2020), arXiv:1911.11027 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, K

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well- Posedness of the Four-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in Singularity Avoiding Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261104 (2022), arXiv:2208.14470 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, K

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Punc- ture gauge formulation for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity and four-derivative scalar-tensor theories in d+1 spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084018 (2023), arXiv:2306.14966 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    A. H. K. R, J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Where and why does Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory break down?, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044044 (2023), arXiv:2211.08477 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. D. Kovacs, On the construction of asymptotically flat initial data in scalar-tensor effective field theory, (2021), arXiv:2103.06895 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Gravitational collapse in Einstein dilaton-Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 134001 (2019), arXiv:1903.07543 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  59. [67]

    CTTK Hybrid

    is used to solve the constraint equations, using the CTTK method [68]. The adaptation of this method to the modified gravity case is described in detail in [69], building on the analysis of [65]. Here we simply highlight the choices relevant to this work. In the CTTK method, w...

    2023

  60. [68]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea et al., GRTresna: An open-source code to solve the initial data constraints in numerical relativity, (2025), arXiv:2501.13046 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and E. A. Lim, CTTK: a new method to solve the initial data constraints in nu- merical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 075003 (2023), arXiv:2207.03125 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    S. E. Brady, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., Solving the initial conditions problem for mod- ified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104022 (2023), arXiv:2308.16791 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Arest´ e Sal´ o, S

    L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, S. E. Brady, K. Clough, D. Doneva, T. Evstafyeva, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, L. Rossi, and S. Yao, GRFolres: A code for modified gravity simula- tions in strong gravity, J. Open Source Softw. 9, 6369 (2024), arXiv:2309.06225 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Lehner, and R. Luna, Challenges to global solutions in Horndeski’s theory, Phys. Rev. D100, 024011 (2019), arXiv:1904.12866 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Bezares, R

    M. Bezares, R. Aguilera-Miret, L. ter Haar, M. Crisos- tomi, C. Palenzuela, and E. Barausse, No Evidence of Kinetic Screening in Simulations of Merging Binary Neu- tron Stars beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091103 (2022), arXiv:2107.05648 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Figueras and T

    P. Figueras and T. Fran¸ ca, Gravitational Collapse in Cu- bic Horndeski Theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 225009 (2020), arXiv:2006.09414 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Figueras and T

    P. Figueras and T. Fran¸ ca, Black hole binaries in cubic Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124004 (2022), 12 arXiv:2112.15529 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Figueras, A

    P. Figueras, A. D. Kov´ acs, and S. Yao, Stable non-linear evolution in regularised higher derivative effective field theories, (2025), arXiv:2505.00082 [hep-th]

    2025

  69. [77]

    D. Alic, C. Bona-Casas, C. Bona, L. Rezzolla, and C. Palenzuela, Conformal and covariant formulation of the Z4 system with constraint-violation damping, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064040 (2012), arXiv:1106.2254 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  70. [78]

    C. Bona, J. Masso, E. Seidel, and J. Stela, A New for- malism for numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 600 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9412071

    1995 arXiv

  71. [79]

    J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Gravitational wave extraction from an in- spiraling configuration of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511103

    2006 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Campanelli, C

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti, and Y. Zlo- chower, Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole bina- ries without excision, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511048

    2006 arXiv

  73. [81]

    J. R. van Meter, J. G. Baker, M. Koppitz, and D.-I. Choi, How to move a black hole without excision: Gauge con- ditions for the numerical evolution of a moving puncture, Phys. Rev. D 73, 124011 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0605030

    2006 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Andrade et al., Grchombo: An adaptable numerical relativity code for fundamental physics, J

    T. Andrade et al., Grchombo: An adaptable numerical relativity code for fundamental physics, J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3703 (2021), arXiv:2201.03458 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Radia, U

    M. Radia, U. Sperhake, A. Drew, K. Clough, P. Figueras, E. A. Lim, J. L. Ripley, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, T. Fran¸ ca, and T. Helfer, Lessons for adaptive mesh refinement in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 135006 (2022), arXiv:2112.10567 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Clough, P

    K. Clough, P. Figueras, H. Finkel, M. Kunesch, E. A. Lim, and S. Tunyasuvunakool, Grchombo : Numerical relativity with adaptive mesh refinement, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 24 (2015), arXiv:1503.03436 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.