Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Chaos and thermalization in open quantum systems

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper extends the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis to open quantum systems, conjecturing that local superoperators on Liouvillian stripes obey ETH statistics with $1/\mathcal{D}$ fluctuations and Gaussian off-diagonal elements.

desk verdict Original and worth engaging, but the stripe width is chosen by maximizing the very GOE diagnostic used to certify chaos — the numerical support for Liouvillian ETH is suggestive, not yet convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.18260 v1 pith:BXXTZQRP submitted 2025-05-23 quant-ph

Filippo Ferrari , Vincenzo Savona , Fabrizio Minganti This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81Q5082C1015B5281S22 PACS 03.65.Yz05.30.-d05.45.Mt
keywords eigenstatethermalizationhypothesisopenquantumsystemsLiouvillianstripeschaosrandommatrixtheoryLindbladmasterequationdissipativemany-body
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that open quantum systems governed by a Lindblad equation can satisfy an eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) of their own. The proposed statement is that local superoperators, when restricted to a 'Liouvillian stripe'—a spectral slice of the non-Hermitian Liouvillian at nearly fixed decay rate—have matrix elements with the same structure as ETH for Hermitian Hamiltonians: a smooth diagonal part plus Gaussian off-diagonal fluctuations whose variance scales as $1/\mathcal{D}$, where $\mathcal{D}$ is the Liouville-space dimension. The authors substantiate this with exact diagonalization of random Liouvillians and of a driven-dissipative XXZ spin chain, comparing chaotic and integrable regimes. If the conjecture holds, it gives a statistical-mechanics foundation for thermalization in Markovian open systems and predicts that chaotic dissipation strips local probe responses of structure, which matters for controlling and measuring many-body open quantum devices.

What carries the argument

The Liouvillian stripe is the organizing object: a vertical slice of the complex spectrum obtained by fixing the real part of the eigenvalues to $\Gamma$ within a narrow width $d_{\max}$. Gauging away this common decay rate leaves purely imaginary eigenvalues $i\Omega_\alpha$, so each stripe can be reinterpreted as a pseudo-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian $\hat{H}_{\mathrm{eff}}(\Gamma)$ with real eigenenergies; the stripe width is chosen by maximizing the one-dimensional level-spacing ratio $\langle r\rangle$ over $d$, which yields GOE-like statistics in chaotic systems and Poisson statistics in integrable ones. The conjectured identity of Eq. (6) is then the statement that local superoperators—coherent perturbations $\hat{O}_{\mathrm{coh}}\hat{\rho} = [\hat{O},\hat{\rho}]$ and measurement superoperators $\hat{O}_{\mathrm{m}}\hat{\rho} = \hat{O}\hat{\rho}\hat{O}^\dagger$—behave on these eigenstates like ETH operators on the eigenstates of a Hermitian chaotic Hamiltonian.

What would settle it

A decisive test would fix the stripe width by an a priori rule—say $d = c/\mathcal{D}^\alpha$ for some constants $c,\alpha$—and then check in a chaotic driven-dissipative spin chain whether the diagonal variance still scales as $1/\mathcal{D}$ and the off-diagonal elements remain Gaussian; if those signatures appear only at the specially tuned width that maximizes $\langle r\rangle$, the conjecture fails as a predictive statement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a conjectured ETH for Liouvillians, stated in Eq. (6): within a stripe of nearly equal decay rate $\Gamma$, the matrix elements of a local superoperator between right eigenstates read $O_{\alpha\beta} = \mathcal{O}(E,\Gamma)\,\delta_{\alpha\beta} + e^{-S(E)/2} f(E,\omega,\Gamma)\,R_{\alpha\beta}$, with $R_{\alpha\beta}$ Gaussian random numbers. The paper reports numerical evidence that in chaotic systems the diagonal variance and the off-diagonal variance both decrease as $1/\mathcal{D}$, that off-diagonal elements are Gaussian, and that the smooth functions $\mathcal{O}$ and $f$ genuinely depend on the stripe decay rate. It also provides the contrasting integrable case, where the variances stay roughly constant and the off-diagonal distribution is non-Gaussian, and it connects the conjecture to dynamics by showing that stripe-restricted observables in the chaotic chain decay without coherent oscillations, while the integrable chain keeps oscillating because only few eigenstates participate.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Liouvillian spectrum can be sliced into vertical stripes of nearly constant decay rate, with each stripe acting as a bona fide pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real energies; since the stripe width is chosen after the fact by maximizing the level-spacing ratio, the random-matrix statistics observed inside a stripe are partly selected by that choice rather than predicted independently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a chaotic open system, local observables decay toward the steady state with suppressed coherent oscillations, because the many frequencies inside a stripe interfere destructively.
  • Coherent or measurement-based probes of a chaotic dissipative system produce structureless response spectra, so individual Liouvillian eigenfrequencies and decay rates become hard to extract from local signals.
  • The $1/\mathcal{D}$ scaling of diagonal and off-diagonal variances gives a practical, observable-based diagnostic of quantum chaos in dissipative many-body systems, supplementing spectral level statistics.
  • Integrable open systems are expected to violate the conjecture, keeping a finite variance and non-Gaussian off-diagonal distributions at large system size.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the smooth functions $\mathcal{O}(E,\Gamma)$ and $f(E,\omega,\Gamma)$ depend on the stripe decay rate, the same local observable could thermalize differently in different dissipative environments, making decay rate an extra thermodynamic control parameter.
  • A fully predictive version of the conjecture requires a principled, system-size-dependent choice of stripe width; without one, the random-matrix signatures inside a stripe are partly a product of the construction.
  • Engineered dissipation could be used deliberately to erase coherent response features of a many-body system, suggesting a control strategy for hiding or protecting local information from readout.
  • Extending the free-probability formulation of Hermitian ETH to this superoperator setting would sharpen the conjecture from first and second moments to the full distribution of matrix elements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generalization of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) to open quantum systems described by Lindblad master equations. The central object is the 'Liouvillian stripe', a vertical slice of the complex Liouvillian spectrum at fixed decay rate, on which the imaginary parts of the eigenvalues are treated as the real spectrum of an effective pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The authors conjecture (Eq. 6) that matrix elements of local superoperators within a stripe follow an ETH-like Ansatz: a smooth diagonal term plus a Gaussian random part whose variance scales as the inverse of the Liouville-space dimension. Numerical support is presented for random Liouvillians and for a driven-dissipative XXZ spin chain, showing 1/D variance scaling and Gaussian off-diagonal statistics in chaotic (but not integrable) regimes, together with a dynamical consequence: suppression of coherent oscillations in local observables. The paper is framed as a conjecture with numerical evidence, not a proof.

Significance. If valid, the Liouvillian-ETH conjecture provides a conceptual bridge between non-Hermitian random matrix theory, quantum chaos, and thermalization in open systems, and it yields a concrete, falsifiable prediction for the scaling of superoperator matrix elements. The manuscript is explicitly honest about the conjectural status and ships reproducible numerical data via QuantumToolbox.jl. The negative control (integrable case) and the dynamical predictions add value. However, the evidence as presented is not yet at the standard needed to establish the conjecture: the stripe definition is data-dependent, the scaling tests are under-powered, and the distributional claims are not quantitatively validated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Supplementary Information, Sec. II (Eq. 12)] The Liouvillian stripe is defined by the width dmax that maximizes the one-dimensional level-spacing ratio ⟨r⟩, the same diagnostic used to certify that the stripe has GOE-like spectral statistics. Because the identical selection rule determines which eigenpairs are included in the matrix-element statistics in Figs. 1 and 2, the reported 1/D variance scaling and Gaussian off-diagonal distributions are conditioned on a partition that has been optimized to look GOE-like. The paper does not test robustness to this choice: no results are shown for fixed widths, for widths away from dmax, or for alternative partition rules (e.g., based on density of states or a fixed fraction of the spectral span). Since the conjecture (Eq. 6) is stated for 'a Liouvillian stripe' without an a priori definition, this is a load-bearing gap: if the ETH signatures disappear under a reasonable, non-optimized stripe definition, the numerical support is an artifact of the selection rule.
  2. [Fig. 1(a) inset and Fig. 2(c) inset] The claim that the diagonal variance scales as 1/D is supported by only four system sizes for the random Liouvillian (D = 60, 80, 100, 120) and three for the spin chain (N = 7, 8, 9), with no error bars and no fitted exponent. The insets show data points compared visually to a 1/D line, but no power-law fit, confidence intervals, or statistical test are provided. Given that Eq. (6) makes a precise prediction for the exponent and the prefactor structure, the numerical evidence should include a quantitative fit (e.g., log-log regression with uncertainties) or additional system sizes; without this, the scaling claim is not established beyond qualitative inspection.
  3. [Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 2(d)] The Gaussianity of off-diagonal matrix elements is asserted from visual comparison of the empirical PDF with a Gaussian of the same variance, for a single energy window (|ω| = 10, δω = 0.2 in the random case; |ω| = 8, δω = 0.1 in the spin chain). The text states 'Similar results are obtained for different choices of ω and δω (not shown)', but no quantitative goodness-of-fit test (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, or cumulant ratios) is reported. Since Eq. (6) predicts Gaussian R_αβ for all ω, a more systematic and quantitative distributional test is needed to support the conjecture.
  4. [Eq. (6) and preceding text] Equation (6) uses δ_αβ for the diagonal term, whereas the non-Hermitian ETH recalled in Eq. (3) contains the overlap ⟨φ_α|φ_β⟩, which is not δ_αβ for non-orthogonal right eigenvectors. The authors do not specify whether the matrix elements O_αβ in Eq. (6) are computed in the biorthogonal basis (with ⟨l_α|r_β⟩ = δ_αβ) or in the right-eigenbasis alone. This distinction is essential for interpreting the numerics in Figs. 1 and 2 and for the correctness of the Ansatz. Please clarify the basis and normalization convention, and if the right-only basis is used, justify the replacement of the overlap with δ_αβ.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo in the phrase 'This interpretation is in contrst with' — 'contrst' should be 'contrast'.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The notation eO(E) for the smooth function is nonstandard and confusing, as it may be misread as the exponential of an operator. Consider denoting it as O(E) or a distinct symbol such as Ō(E).
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] 'The purple line referes to the integrable model' should read 'refers'.
  4. [Supplementary Information, Fig. 4(d) caption] The caption says 'Scaling of the stripe width dmax' but the main text in the same paragraph explains that for unbounded random matrices dmax remains constant while for matrices constrained to a box it scales polynomially; please make the caption consistent with the text.
  5. [Discussion and conclusions] The 'Note added' mentions Ref. [54] as an alternative definition of ETH in open systems, but the relation and contrast to the present framework are not discussed; adding a brief comparison would help the reader situate the contribution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The Liouvillian stripe is defined by maximizing the 1D level-spacing ratio ⟨r⟩, so the stripe's GOE-like statistics are partly tautological and the ETH matrix-element tests are conditioned on a data-dependent partition; the central Eq. (6) ansatz itself retains independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary Information, Section II 'Construction of the Liouvillian stripe', Eq. (12)]
    "We organize the Liouvillian spectrum in a collection of rectangular boxes of width d and we gauge out the real part of the Liouvillian eigenvalues, so that λα → Ωα. We compute the Hamiltonian ratio ⟨r⟩ over the (re-ordered) set of real numbers Ωα. By sweeping over d, we identify the point dmax for which ⟨r⟩ is maximum."

    The stripe—the object on which Eq. (6) and the matrix-element statistics in Figs. 1–2 are defined—is obtained by maximizing the Hamiltonian ratio ⟨r⟩ (Eq. 12), the same statistic used to certify Wigner-Dyson statistics. The main-text statement that a chaotic stripe 'shows the Wigner-Dyson-like distribution of Hermitian random matrices' is therefore not an independent prediction: dmax is by construction the width maximizing that diagnostic, and ⟨r⟩(dmax) ≃ 0.51 is a selected maximum. Since dmax also determines which eigenpairs enter the diagonal/off-diagonal distributions, the 1/D scaling and Gaussian statistics are computed on a data-dependent partition. No fixed-width or alternative-partition tests are shown, so the ETH signatures could partly be artifacts of the optimization.

full rationale

The paper's principal conjecture, Eq. (6), is introduced as an ansatz and then tested numerically against random Liouvillians and a driven-dissipative spin chain. The 1/D scaling of the diagonal variance and the Gaussian off-diagonal distributions are compared with, not fitted to, the standard ETH/RMT prediction, so that part of the numerical evidence is not circular. However, the definition of the Liouvillian stripe is data-dependent: Supplementary Section II selects the stripe width dmax by maximizing the 1D Hamiltonian ratio ⟨r⟩ (Eq. 12), which is the same diagnostic used to assert that chaotic stripes display Wigner-Dyson-like statistics. Consequently, the observation that stripes in chaotic systems have ⟨r⟩ ≈ 0.51 is partly enforced by the selection rule rather than independently predicted. Moreover, since dmax fixes which eigenpairs contribute to the matrix-element statistics in Figs. 1 and 2, the reported ETH signatures are conditioned on the optimized partition; the paper does not demonstrate robustness of the 1/D scaling or Gaussian statistics to fixed or alternative stripe definitions. This is a genuine but partial circularity: it qualifies the numerical support for the conjecture, but it does not reduce Eq. (6) itself to an input. Self-citations to Ref. [19] are interpretive rather than load-bearing, and the external comparisons to Hermitian ETH in Refs. [32,33] provide independent benchmarks, so no higher score is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the new concept of a Liouvillian stripe, whose construction involves a per-system free parameter dmax chosen to maximize GOE-like level statistics. Additional assumptions include the validity of the Lindblad description and the transfer of non-Hermitian ETH to the effective pseudo-Hermitian picture. No physical entities beyond the spectral construction are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Stripe width dmax = System-size dependent; e.g., roughly 10^-0.7 to 10^-0.6 for Liouville dimensions around 10^4 to 10^5 (see SI Fig. 5d)
    Chosen for each system by maximizing the 1D level-spacing ratio ⟨r⟩ within the stripe (SI Section II). This data-dependent selection affects which eigenstates enter the ETH statistics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lindblad master equation accurately models Markovian open quantum systems
    Starting point of the paper, Eq. (4). Standard in the field.
  • domain assumption Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians (Refs. [22,25]) holds and transfers to effective pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians
    The paper relies on non-Hermitian ETH to motivate the superoperator ETH; this is cited from the literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The Liouvillian spectrum can be partitioned into vertical stripes with a well-defined dmax such that the imaginary parts obey 1D RMT statistics
    This is the new construction; its existence is asserted and demonstrated numerically, with dmax chosen by maximizing ⟨r⟩.
  • ad hoc to paper Within a stripe, the restriction of the Liouvillian yields a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenenergies
    Stated in the main text without a full proof; supported by numerical data in the SI.
invented entities (1)
  • Liouvillian stripe
    purpose: Spectral subset of the Liouvillian with approximately fixed decay rate, used to define effective pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and to formulate the ETH conjecture.
    The existence and properties of the stripes are established only within this paper; no external falsifiable handle is provided beyond the numerical demonstrations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chaos and thermalization in open quantum systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BXXTZQRP

@misc{pith2026250518260,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chaos and thermalization in open quantum systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BXXTZQRP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.18260}
}
read the original abstract

The eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) provides a cornerstone for understanding thermalization in isolated quantum systems, linking quantum chaos with statistical mechanics. In this work, we extend the ETH framework to open quantum systems governed by Lindblad dynamics. We introduce the concept of Liouvillian stripe (spectral subset of the non-Hermitian Liouvillian superoperator) which enables the definition of effective pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians. This construction allows us to conjecture a Liouvillian version of ETH, whereby local superoperators exhibit statistical properties akin to ETH in closed systems. We substantiate our hypothesis using both random Liouvillians and a driven-dissipative quantum spin chain, showing that thermalization manifests through the suppression of coherent oscillations and the emergence of structureless local dynamics. These findings have practical implications for the control and measurement of many-body open quantum systems, highlighting how chaotic dissipative dynamics can obscure the system response to external probes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.18260 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Signatures of ETH in random Liouvillians. (a) As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Signatures of Liouvillian ETH in a driven-dissipative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Liouvillian ETH and dynamics. (a) Sum of the spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Construction of the Liouvillian stripe in non-Hermitian random matrices. (a) and (b) Complex spacing ratios for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Construction of the Liouvillian stripe in random Liouvillians. (a) Complex spacing ratios for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Construction of the Liouvillian stripe for the driven-dissipative spin chain described by Eqs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Liouvillian ETH and dynamics for the local magnetization operator ˆσ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Open-system dynamics in local Lindbladians with chaotic spectra

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For local Lindbladians with Ginibre-like spectra, eigenoperator size is locked to decay rate, giving state-independent early-time purity decay and size-limited operator growth.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 0th ed. (CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963)

    work page 1963

  3. [3]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    1991

  4. [4]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994)

    1994

  5. [5]

    Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J

    M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 1163 (1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature 452, 854 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 81, 082001 (2018)

    2018

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    T. Guhr, A. M¨ uller–Groeling, and H. A. Weidenm¨ uller, Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: common concepts, Phys. Rep. 299, 189 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos , Springer Se- ries in Synergetics, Vol

    F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos , Springer Se- ries in Synergetics, Vol. 54 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , 1st ed. (Oxford University PressOx- ford, 2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Akemann, M

    G. Akemann, M. Kieburg, A. Mielke, and T. Prosen, Universal Signature from Integrability to Chaos in Dis- sipative Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 254101 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Hamazaki, K

    R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, N. Kura, and M. Ueda, Universality classes of non-Hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023286 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    L. S´ a, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Complex Spacing Ra- tios: A Signature of Dissipative Quantum Chaos, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021019 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Dahan, G

    D. Dahan, G. Arwas, and E. Grosfeld, Classical and quantum chaos in chirally-driven, dissipative Bose- Hubbard systems, npj Quant. Inf. 8, 14 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Prasad, H

    M. Prasad, H. K. Yadalam, C. Aron, and M. Kulka- rni, Dissipative quantum dynamics, phase transitions, and non-Hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. A 105, L050201 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Kawabata, A

    K. Kawabata, A. Kulkarni, J. Li, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Symmetry of Open Quantum Systems: Classi- fication of Dissipative Quantum Chaos, PRX Quantum 4, 030328 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Villase˜ nor, L

    D. Villase˜ nor, L. F. Santos, and P. Barberis-Blostein, Breakdown of the Quantum Distinction of Regular and Chaotic Classical Dynamics in Dissipative Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 240404 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Ferrari, L

    F. Ferrari, L. Gravina, D. Eeltink, P. Scarlino, V. Savona, and F. Minganti, Dissipative quantum chaos unveiled by stochastic quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013276 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Bertini, F

    B. Bertini, F. H. Essler, S. Groha, and N. J. Robin- son, Prethermalization and Thermalization in Models with Weak Integrability Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180601 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda, Ther- malization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 112001 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Singha Roy, S

    S. Singha Roy, S. Bandyopadhyay, R. Costa De Almeida, and P. Hauke, Unveiling Eigenstate Thermalization for Non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 180405 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltoni- ans, Reports on Progress in Physics 70, 947–1018 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Cipolloni and J

    G. Cipolloni and J. Kudler-Flam, Non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. B 109, L020201 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Grobe, F

    R. Grobe, F. Haake, and H.-J. Sommers, Quantum Dis- tinction of Regular and Chaotic Dissipative Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1899 (1988)

    1988

  19. [27]

    MOSTAF AZADEH, Pseudo-hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geomet- ric Methods in Modern Physics 07, 1191–1306 (2010)

    A. MOSTAF AZADEH, Pseudo-hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geomet- ric Methods in Modern Physics 07, 1191–1306 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    For numerical purposes, these can be defined as Ocoh = ˆO ⊗ 1 − 1 ⊗ ˆOT and Om = ˆO ⊗ ˆO∗

  21. [29]

    [31] , we define a basis for the operators in the Hilbert space { ˆGj} with j = 0,

    Following Ref. [31] , we define a basis for the operators in the Hilbert space { ˆGj} with j = 0, . . . , D2 − 1 such that Tr[ ˆG† j ˆGk] = δjk , with ˆG0 = 1/ √ D. We construct r jump operators as ˆLj = g PD2−1 k=1 ˆGkwk,j , with ˆLj traceless and w a matrix sampled from a Gi...

  22. [30]

    Denisov, T

    S. Denisov, T. Laptyeva, W. Tarnowski, D. Chru´ sci´ nski, and K. Zyczkowski, Universal Spectra of Random Lind- blad Operators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140403 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    L. S´ a, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Spectral and steady- state properties of random Liouvillians, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 305303 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Brenes, T

    M. Brenes, T. LeBlond, J. Goold, and M. Rigol, Eigen- state Thermalization in a Locally Perturbed Integrable System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070605 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Brenes, J

    M. Brenes, J. Goold, and M. Rigol, Low-frequency be- havior of off-diagonal matrix elements in the integrable 7 XXZ chain and in a locally perturbed quantum-chaotic XXZ chain, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075127 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    M. V. Medvedyeva, F. H. Essler, and T. Prosen, Exact Bethe Ansatz Spectrum of a Tight-Binding Chain with Dephasing Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 137202 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Pappalardi, L

    S. Pappalardi, L. Foini, and J. Kurchan, Eigenstate Ther- malization Hypothesis and Free Probability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170603 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Fritzsch, T

    F. Fritzsch, T. Prosen, and S. Pappalardi, Microcanoni- cal free cumulants in lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054303 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    M. Fava, J. Kurchan, and S. Pappalardi, Designs via Free Probability, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011031 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Pappalardi, F

    S. Pappalardi, F. Fritzsch, and T. Prosen, Full Eigenstate Thermalization via Free Cumulants in Quantum Lattice Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 140404 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155111 (2007)

    2007

  32. [40]

    Pal and D

    A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174411 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Un- bounded Growth of Entanglement in Models of Many- Body Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Local Conserva- tion Laws and the Structure of the Many-Body Localized States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127201 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium : Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a Rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and stability to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155134 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum many- body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity Breaking Arising from Hilbert Space Fragmentation in Dipole-Conserving Hamiltoni- ans, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011047 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Khemani, M

    V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Local- ization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174204 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Brighi, M

    P. Brighi, M. Ljubotina, and M. Serbyn, Hilbert space fragmentation and slow dynamics in particle-conserving quantum East models, SciPost Phys. 15, 093 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Hamazaki, M

    R. Hamazaki, M. Nakagawa, T. Haga, and M. Ueda, Lindbladian Many-Body Localization (2022), arXiv:2206.02984 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Y. Li, P. Sala, and F. Pollmann, Hilbert space fragmenta- tion in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043239 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    A. M. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, Z. Lu, L. S´ a, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Lindblad many-body scars (2025), arXiv:2503.06665 [quant-ph]

    2025

  46. [54]

    Almeida, P

    G. Almeida, P. Ribeiro, M. Haque, and L. S´ a, Uni- versality, robustness, and limits of the eigenstate ther- malization hypothesis in open quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2504.10261 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  47. [55]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characteri- zation of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984)

    1984

  48. [56]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Dis- tribution of the Ratio of Consecutive Level Spacings in Random Matrix Ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 084101 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Chaos and thermalization in open quantum systems

    A. Mercurio, Y.-T. Huang, L.-X. Cai, Y.-N. Chen, V. Savona, and F. Nori, QuantumToolbox.jl: An efficient Julia framework for simulating open quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2504.21440 [quant-ph]. 8 Supplementary Information for “Chaos and thermalization in open quantum systems” ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.