Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Realistic Multi-temperature Dust: How Well Can We Constrain the Dust Properties of High-redshift Galaxies?

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Single-temperature modified blackbody fits recover infrared luminosity but systematically underestimate dust mass by up to 0.6 dex and flatten the dust emissivity index for broad, cold temperature distributions at z~7.

desk verdict Useful controlled experiment on single-temperature dust fitting biases, but the headline 0.6 dex underestimate is likely inflated by an unphysical negative-temperature tail in the adopted PDF. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20105 v1 pith:UMLJVEWW submitted 2025-05-26 astro-ph.GA

Laura Sommovigo , Hiddo Algera This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dustmasstemperaturedistributionmodifiedblackbodyhigh-redshiftgalaxiesALMAinfraredluminosityemissivityindexskewednormal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the standard practice of fitting high-redshift galaxies' far-infrared emission with a single-temperature modified blackbody returns trustworthy dust properties. It builds realistic mock dust SEDs from a skewed normal distribution of dust temperatures, calibrated against hydrodynamical simulations of galaxies and quasars, and fits them back exactly as observers fit ALMA data at z=7. The authors find that infrared luminosities are usually recovered to within about 0.3 dex, but dust masses can be underestimated by up to 0.6 dex when the temperature distribution is broad and cold, and the fitted emissivity index is systematically shallower than the true value of 2. These systematic biases become larger than the statistical uncertainties once a galaxy's SED is well sampled across many ALMA bands.

What carries the argument

The central object is the skewed normal distribution used as the dust temperature probability density function, parameterized by the mass-weighted mean temperature, the width, and the skewness of the distribution. The mock SED is the integral of optically thin modified blackbodies weighted by this PDF, with a CMB-heating correction applied per temperature bin. Fitting that SED with a single-temperature modified blackbody is what produces the biases, and the flattening of beta_d follows from the curvature of the Planck function being smeared out by the temperature mixture.

What would settle it

Generate mock SEDs from a bimodal temperature distribution (for instance two delta functions at 30 K and 80 K) and fit them with the same single-temperature MCMC; if the resulting dust-mass underestimate and beta_d flattening differ from the paper's skewed-normal calibration by more than ~0.2 dex, the quantitative results depend on the assumed PDF shape and would need to be re-derived for real galaxies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the single-temperature approximation is not equally safe for all derived quantities: for a galaxy whose dust spans a broad range of temperatures around a cool mass-weighted mean, the fitted MBB temperature lands between the mass- and luminosity-weighted temperatures, the fitted dust mass underestimates the true mass by up to ~0.6 dex, and the recovered emissivity index is flattened by up to ~0.2 relative to the input beta_d = 2 due to temperature mixing. Infrared luminosity remains reliable to within ~0.3 dex for typical mass-weighted temperatures below ~50 K, degrading only when the SED peak shifts beyond ALMA's coverage. The paper thus sharpens the interpretation of observed beta_d values: a steep recovered beta_d would signal genuine changes in grain composition or size, whereas shallow values may simply reflect multi-temperature dust.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the distribution of physical dust temperatures inside high-redshift galaxies is a skewed normal distribution, a shape validated against only a couple of simulations; if real galaxies have bimodal or more complex temperature distributions, the quoted bias values could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dust masses reported for z~6-8 galaxies with broad, cold temperature distributions (e.g., some quasars and evolved, metal-rich galaxies) may be systematically low by up to ~0.6 dex, worsening the inferred tension in early dust production models.
  • IR luminosities and obscured star-formation rates derived from single-temperature fits are generally robust to within ~0.3 dex for typical galaxies, so existing obscured-SFR measurements at z~7 are probably not badly biased.
  • A recovered beta_d below the assumed input does not by itself indicate grain evolution; only a steep beta_d recovered from well-sampled SEDs can be read as evidence for differences in grain composition or size distribution.
  • As multi-band ALMA coverage and future instruments like PRIMA become common, systematic errors from multi-temperature dust will exceed the statistical uncertainties of Bayesian single-temperature fits, so the approximation should be replaced or calibrated.
  • The dust-model uncertainty in the opacity normalization remains the dominant systematic in dust masses, comparable to or larger than the multi-temperature effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real high-redshift galaxies have bimodal or otherwise non-skew-normal temperature distributions, the numerical size of the mass underestimate could shift, although the direction (mass undercount and beta flattening) is likely to persist; the paper's quantitative calibration depends on the assumed PDF shape.
  • The same skewed-normal machinery could be folded directly into Bayesian SED fitting codes to recover the mass- and luminosity-weighted temperatures as observables, rather than a single effective temperature that corresponds to neither.
  • The bias analysis implies that comparisons of dust masses across studies that adopt different opacity models and different fitted beta_d values could mislead by up to ~1 dex; a consistent model choice is necessary before interpreting trends in dust-to-gas ratio or dust-to-metal ratio with redshift.
  • A testable extension: apply the model to local galaxies with spatially resolved dust temperature maps to see whether measured PDFs follow the skewed normal shape, which would directly assess the key assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs mock far-infrared SEDs for z ≈ 7 galaxies by summing optically thin modified blackbodies weighted by a skewed-normal dust temperature PDF, then fits the resulting SEDs with single-temperature modified blackbodies in two ALMA setups ('Basic ALMA': bands 6–8 with fixed β_d = 2; 'Super ALMA': bands 3–10 with free β_d). The authors quantify how the recovered dust mass, IR luminosity, and emissivity index deviate from the input values across a grid of mean temperature, width, and skewness. The central claim is that single-temperature fits recover dust mass well except for broad, cold distributions (underestimate by up to 0.6 dex), recover L_IR within ~0.3 dex for typical temperatures, and systematically flatten β_d.

Significance. If the bias calibration is robust, the paper provides valuable guidance for interpreting high-redshift single-temperature SED fits, with direct implications for dust masses, obscured star formation rates, and the interpretation of steep β_d as a grain-property indicator. The mock construction is a controlled experiment with no circularity: SEDs are generated from a known input PDF and then compared with the known inputs. The analytical model is validated against two radiative-transfer simulations (a SERRA galaxy and a Di Mascia quasar) and several observed high-z SEDs, and the MCMC fitting is standard and clearly described. The paper also usefully inventories competing systematic uncertainties (dust model, optical depth, multi-temperature effects) and gives a transparent comparison of their magnitudes. The central quantitative result, however, is compromised by an unaddressed issue with the support of the skewed-normal PDF for the coldest, broadest part of the grid.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eqs. (2)–(3) and (8)] The skew-normal PDF in Eq. (2) has support on the full real line, and the paper does not state whether the integral in Eq. (8) truncates the PDF at T_d = 0. For the cold, broad grid points that drive the headline result (e.g., T̄_d = 30–40 K, σ_T/T̄_d = 0.6, ζ = 0.01), roughly 5% of the probability mass lies at negative T_d. Because Eq. (3) depends only on T_d^{4+β} (an even function for integer β), negative T_d values are mapped to positive T'_d, which folds the cold tail onto positive temperatures and changes the effective temperature distribution relative to the quoted input parameters. If the PDF is instead truncated at T_d = 0, the realized mean and width of the distribution differ from the T̄_d and σ_T used to label the grid. In either case, the claimed 0.6 dex mass underestimate for this regime is not a clean measure of the multi-temperature effect for the stated input PDF. Please specify the integration limits, truncate and renormalize (or restrict the grid to parameter regions where the negative tail is negligible), and recompute the biases.
  2. [Section 2.1, Eq. (8)] The integrand as written uses f(T'_d), but the PDF f is defined for the intrinsic temperature T_d and then transformed via Eq. (3). A correct change of variables requires f(T_d) with the appropriate Jacobian, or a properly derived PDF for T'_d. As written, the equation is ambiguous and does not unambiguously define the mock SED construction. This is not merely a notational issue because it affects the shape of the generated SEDs and hence the reported bias magnitudes.
  3. [Section 3.1, paragraph after Figure 3] The text states that 'dust masses [are] overestimated by ~0.5 dex' for wide PDFs, while the figure caption, the following paragraph, Figure 4, and Section 5 all state that dust masses are underestimated. This contradiction must be resolved; the direction of the bias is one of the paper's principal conclusions, and the current text is internally inconsistent.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] Please state explicitly whether the PDF is truncated at T_d = 0 and how the quoted T̄_d and σ_T relate to the truncated distribution; this will help readers interpret the grid and the reported biases.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3] The abstract and conclusions quote the 0.6 dex mass underestimate, while Section 3.1 reports up to ~0.5 dex for the Basic ALMA setup and Section 3.2 reports up to ~0.6 dex for Super ALMA. Please make the setup-specific values consistent in the abstract or explicitly state that the headline number refers to the Super ALMA setup.
  3. [Section 4.3] The bullet list of adopted opacity models is useful, but the conversion to ν_0 = 1900 GHz with fixed β_d = 2 is not shown; listing the resulting κ_0 values explicitly would spare readers the arithmetic and make the ~0.5 dex spread more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a controlled recovery experiment whose biases are measured against its own known input SEDs.

full rationale

The central result is a controlled recovery experiment: mock SEDs are generated from a specified skewed-normal dust temperature PDF (Eq. 2) via Eq. 8 with known dust mass and beta=2, then fitted with a single-temperature modified blackbody. The reported biases are compared directly to the known input values, so no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction and no claimed output is equivalent to its input by construction. The skew-normal ansatz is an input assumption grounded in the central limit theorem and validated against external simulations (Pallottini et al. 2022; Di Mascia et al. 2023) rather than derived from the target result. Self-citations such as Sommovigo et al. (2020, 2021, 2022a,b) motivate physical parameter ranges and the T_d-S22 relation in Eq. 10, but they are not load-bearing for the bias values computed in Section 3. The possible issue of negative-temperature support in Eq. 2 for cold, broad grid points is a modeling artifact that could affect the quantitative magnitude of the reported bias, but it does not make any claim equal to its input by definition; it is a correctness risk, not circularity. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim is a controlled simulation experiment: the input dust SED is constructed from a known temperature PDF, and the recovery bias is measured relative to that known input. The main free parameters are the shape parameters of the temperature distribution, which are varied over a grid rather than fitted to external data. Validation against simulations uses hand-tuned parameters, but these do not affect the main grid results.

free parameters (5)
  • Mass-weighted dust temperature Tbar_d = grid 30-100 K
    Input to the mock SED; varied in 10 K steps. The central bias results are shown as a function of this parameter.
  • Temperature PDF width sigma_T / Tbar_d = grid 0.1-0.6
    Input width; controls breadth of the PDF and the magnitude of the mass bias.
  • Skewness zeta = 0.01, 0.98
    Two values chosen to bracket high and low skewness; found to have limited effect.
  • Validation parameters for Zinnia = (60 K, 16 K, 0.98)
    Hand-tuned to reproduce the SERRA simulation in Fig. 1; anchors the fiducial model.
  • Signal-to-noise in mock bands = 10 (bands 3-8), 5 (bands 9-10)
    Chosen to mimic achievable ALMA observations; sets the fitting uncertainties but not the systematic offsets.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dust emission is optically thin; the SED is the PDF-weighted sum of modified blackbodies (Eq. 8).
    The paper explicitly assumes optically thin dust throughout (Sections 2.1, 4.3), and only discusses optically thick corrections as a separate uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The dust temperature PDF follows a skewed normal distribution (Eq. 2).
    Justified by CLT and asymmetry from CMB floor and star-forming regions; validated against one simulated galaxy and one quasar.
  • domain assumption Dust opacity follows a single power law with beta_d=2, with Draine (2003) normalization (Eq. 9).
    Adopted as input from literature; the paper shows in Section 4.3 that varying kappa_0 changes inferred masses by about 0.5 dex.
  • domain assumption CMB heating correction (Eq. 3) applies to the temperature PDF.
    From Da Cunha et al. (2013); standard in high-z dust SED modeling.
  • ad hoc to paper The MCMC fit uses a flat prior on T_d from T_CMB to 150 K, then a Gaussian taper (Section 2.3).
    Adopted to mimic observer practice; the prior noticeably flattens recovered temperatures for hot inputs (Section 3.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Realistic Multi-temperature Dust: How Well Can We Constrain the Dust Properties of High-redshift Galaxies?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UMLJVEWW

@misc{pith2026250520105,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Realistic Multi-temperature Dust: How Well Can We Constrain the Dust Properties of High-redshift Galaxies?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UMLJVEWW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20105}
}
abstract

Determining the dust properties of high-redshift galaxies from their far-infrared continuum emission is challenging due to limited multi-frequency data. As a result, the dust spectral energy distribution (SED) is often modeled as a single-temperature modified blackbody. We assess the accuracy of the single-temperature approximation by constructing realistic dust SEDs using a physically motivated prescription where the dust temperature probability distribution function (PDF) is described by a skewed normal distribution. This approach captures the complexity of the mass-weighted and luminosity-weighted temperature PDFs of simulated galaxies and quasars, and yields far-infrared SEDs that match high-redshift observations. We explore how varying the mean temperature ($\bar{T}_d$), width, and skewness of the temperature PDF affects the recovery of the dust mass, IR luminosity, and dust emissivity index $\beta_d$ at z=7. Fitting the dust SEDs with a single-temperature approximation, we find that dust masses are generally well-recovered, although they may be underestimated by up to 0.6 dex for broad temperature distributions with a low $\bar{T}_d <$ 40 K, as seen in some high-redshift quasars and/or evolved galaxies. IR luminosities are generally recovered within the $1\sigma$ uncertainty (< 0.3 dex), except at $\bar{T}_d >$ 80 K, where the peak shifts well beyond ALMA's wavelength coverage. The inferred dust emissivity index is consistently shallower than the input one ($\beta_d$=2) due to the effect of multi-temperature dust, suggesting that a steep $\beta_d$ may probe dust composition and grain size variations. With larger galaxy samples and well-sampled dust SEDs, systematic errors from multi-temperature dust may dominate over fitting uncertainties and should thus be considered.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20105 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our simple analytical model can reproduce the mass- and luminosity-weighted dust temperature PDFs and IR SED of a simulated high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The effect of varying our three model parameters on the dust temperature PDFs and IR SEDs of high-redshift galaxies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The effect of multi-temperature dust on the recovered dust temperature, mass and IR luminosity, assuming the ‘Basic ALMA’ setup with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dust emissivity indices are biased to shallower values due to multi-temperature dust. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Our simple analytical model can reproduce the complex IR SEDs of high-redshift galaxies and quasars. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Multi-temperature dust can shift the peak of the dust SED [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effects of temperature-dependent optical properties on the determination of interstellar dust masses

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using lab-measured temperature-dependent opacities, fixed-β modified-blackbody fits overestimate high-z dust masses by 25–60% from temperature dependence alone.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac795b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...64A 934, 64

    Akins H. B., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac795b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...64A 934, 64

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac795b 2022

  2. [2]

    Algera H. S. B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6142A 518, 6142

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3195 2023

  3. [3]

    Algera H. S. B., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.6867A 527, 6867

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3111

  4. [4]

    Algera H. S. B., et al., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1994 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3098A 533, 3098

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1994

  5. [5]

    arXiv:2501.10508

    Algera H., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250110508A p. arXiv:2501.10508

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.10508 2025

  6. [6]

    D., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..10A 542, A10

    Anderson L. D., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..10A 542, A10

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117283 2012

  7. [7]

    Aoyama S., Hou K.-C., Shimizu I., Hirashita H., Todoroki K., Choi J.-H., Nagamine K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3061 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..105A 466, 105

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3061 2017

  8. [8]

    Aoyama S., Hirashita H., Nagamine K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.3844A 491, 3844

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3253 2020

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    S., Takeuchi T

    Asano R. S., Takeuchi T. T., Hirashita H., Inoue A. K., 2013, @doi [Earth, Planets and Space] 10.5047/eps.2012.04.014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013EP&S...65..213A 65, 213

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    Bakx T. J. L. C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa509 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.4294B 493, 4294

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Bakx T. J. L. C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508L..58B 508, L58

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    Bakx T. J. L. C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1613 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.2270B 532, 2270

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    J., Dowell C

    Beelen A., Cox P., Benford D. J., Dowell C. D., Kov \'a cs A., Bertoldi F., Omont A., Carilli C. L., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500636 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..694B 642, 694

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    Behrens C., Pallottini A., Ferrara A., Gallerani S., Vallini L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty552 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477..552B 477, 552

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.2995B 522, 2995

    Bendo G. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.2995B 522, 2995

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    J., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250512141B p

    Bendo G. J., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250512141B p. arXiv:2505.12141

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    B \'e thermin M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037649 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...2B 643, A2

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Bianchi S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220866 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552A..89B 552, A89

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    Bianchi S., Schneider R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11829.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378..973B 378, 973

    2007

  12. [20]

    P., Pakmor R., Walch S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1710 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.6336B 523, 6336

    Bieri R., Naab T., Geen S., Coles J. P., Pakmor R., Walch S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1710 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.6336B 523, 6336

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    R., Knudsen K

    Bossion D., Sarangi A., Aalto S., Esmerian C., Hashemi S. R., Knudsen K. K., Vlemmings W., Nyman G., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.249B 692, A249

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931..160B 931, 160

    Bouwens R. J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931..160B 931, 160

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Bowler R. A. A., Bourne N., Dunlop J. S., McLure R. J., McLeod D. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1631B 481, 1631

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Bowler R. A. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3578 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5808B 527, 5808

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    arXiv:2504.13118

    Burgarella D., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.13118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250413118B p. arXiv:2504.13118

    2025 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Camps P., Baes M., 2015, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.10.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&C.....9...20C 9, 20

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.522..455C 522, 455

    Capak P. L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.522..455C 522, 455

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    Carpenter J., Brogan C., Iono D., Mroczkowski T., 2023, in Physics and Chemistry of Star Formation: The Dynamical ISM Across Time and Spatial Scales. p. 304 ( @eprint arXiv 2211.00195 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2211.00195

    2023 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    Chen Q., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ceb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..147C 972, 147

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Chiang I.-D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5506C 520, 5506

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    arXiv:2504.05384

    Chiang Y.-K., Makiya R., M \'e nard B., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250405384C p. arXiv:2504.05384

    2025 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    R., Kere s D., Hopkins P

    Choban C. R., Kere s D., Hopkins P. F., Sandstrom K. M., Hayward C. C., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1542 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.4506C 514, 4506

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    R., Salim S., Kere s D., Hayward C

    Choban C. R., Salim S., Kere s D., Hayward C. C., Sandstrom K. M., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.08962 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240808962C p. arXiv:2408.08962

    doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    R., Kere s D., Sandstrom K

    Choban C. R., Kere s D., Sandstrom K. M., Hopkins P. F., Hayward C. C., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae716 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.2356C 529, 2356

    doi

  27. [35]

    arXiv:2412.02557

    Ciesla L., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.02557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241202557C p. arXiv:2412.02557

    2024 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    R., Casey C

    Cooper O. R., Casey C. M., Zavala J. A., Champagne J. B., da Cunha E., Long A. S., Spilker J. S., Staguhn J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac616d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930...32C 930, 32

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    Da Cunha E., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766...13D 766, 13

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    Da Cunha E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ae0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...919...30D 919, 30

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Dayal P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac537 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512..989D 512, 989

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Decarli R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.157D 673, A157

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Demyk K., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629711 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...600A.123D 600, A123

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3702 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.4632D 519, 4632

    Di Cesare C., Graziani L., Schneider R., Ginolfi M., Venditti A., Santini P., Hunt L. K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3702 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.4632D 519, 4632

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    Di Mascia F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.2349D 503, 2349

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Di Mascia F., Carniani S., Gallerani S., Vito F., Pallottini A., Ferrara A., Valentini M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3306 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.3667D 518, 3667

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA&A..41..241D 41, 241

    Draine B. T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA&A..41..241D 41, 241

    2003 arXiv

  38. [46]

    231, July 15, 1979, p

    Draine B., Salpeter E., 1979, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 231, July 15, 1979, p. 438-455., 231, 438

    1979

  39. [47]

    Dubois Y., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.240D 687, A240

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03386.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.315..115D 315, 115

    Dunne L., Eales S., Edmunds M., Ivison R., Alexander P., Clements D. L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03386.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.315..115D 315, 115

    2000

  41. [49]

    Dwek E., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...501..643D 501, 643

    1998 doi

  42. [50]

    J., Gnedin N

    Esmerian C. J., Gnedin N. Y., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940...74E 940, 74

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    J., Gnedin N

    Esmerian C. J., Gnedin N. Y., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad410f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...968..113E 968, 113

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    L., et al., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7ccd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...61F 247, 61

    Faisst A. L., et al., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7ccd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...61F 247, 61

    doi

  45. [53]

    L., Fudamoto Y., Oesch P

    Faisst A. L., Fudamoto Y., Oesch P. A., Scoville N., Riechers D. A., Pavesi R., Capak P., 2020b, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staa2545 , 498, 4192

    doi

  46. [54]

    E., Srinivasan S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.4666F 499, 4666

    Fanciullo L., Kemper F., Scicluna P., Dharmawardena T. E., Srinivasan S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.4666F 499, 4666

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761..156F 761, 156

    Federrath C., Klessen R. S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761..156F 761, 156

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    arXiv:2502.10503

    Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.10503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250210503F p. arXiv:2502.10503

    2025 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    Ferrara A., Viti S., Ceccarelli C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463L.112F 463, L112

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    Ferrara A., Hirashita H., Ouchi M., Fujimoto S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1898 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.5018F 471, 5018

    2017 doi

  51. [59]

    arXiv:2501.10541

    Fisher R., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10541 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250110541F p. arXiv:2501.10541

    2025 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707..916F 707, 916

    Fixsen D. J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707..916F 707, 916

    2009 doi

  53. [61]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  54. [62]

    Fudamoto Y., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-03846-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Natur.597..489F 597, 489

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    K., Sugahara Y., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad743 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.2962F 521, 2962

    Fudamoto Y., Inoue A. K., Sugahara Y., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad743 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.2962F 521, 2962

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..673G 56, 673

    Galliano F., Galametz M., Jones A. P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..673G 56, 673

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    K., Maio U., Glatzle M., Ciardi B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa796 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.1071G 494, 1071

    Graziani L., Schneider R., Ginolfi M., Hunt L. K., Maio U., Glatzle M., Ciardi B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa796 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.1071G 494, 1071

    2020 doi

  58. [66]

    Harikane Y., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab94bd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896...93H 896, 93

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Hashimoto T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psz049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASJ...71...71H 71, 71

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    Hashimoto T., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf57c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L...2H 955, L2

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    Helou G., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184793 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...311L..33H 311, L33

    1986 doi

  62. [70]

    H., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983QJRAS..24..267H 24, 267

    Hildebrand R. H., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983QJRAS..24..267H 24, 267

    1983

  63. [71]

    Hirashita H., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20702.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.422.1263H 422, 1263

    2012

  64. [72]

    Hirashita H., Chen C.-C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.4710H 526, 4710

    2023 doi

  65. [73]

    Hirashita H., Chiang I.-D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1612H 516, 1612

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3779H 492, 3779

    Hirashita H., Murga M. S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3779H 492, 3779

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    Hirashita H., Ferrara A., Dayal P., Ouchi M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1290 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.1704H 443, 1704

    2014 doi

  68. [76]

    Hou K.-C., Aoyama S., Hirashita H., Nagamine K., Shimizu I., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.1727H 485, 1727

    2019 doi

  69. [77]

    Hu C.-Y., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty3252 , 483, 3363

    2018 doi

  70. [78]

    S., Naab T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1481 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.3252H 487, 3252

    Hu C.-Y., Zhukovska S., Somerville R. S., Naab T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1481 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.3252H 487, 3252

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    F., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdcfa , 952, 140

    Hu C.-Y., Sternberg A., van Dishoeck E. F., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdcfa , 952, 140

    2023 doi

  72. [80]

    K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576A..33H 576, A33

    Hunt L. K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576A..33H 576, A33

    2015 doi

  73. [81]

    Hygate A. P. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1212 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.tmp.1365H

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    Inami H., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1779 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.3126I 515, 3126

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    K., Hashimoto T., Chihara H., Koike C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1577I 495, 1577

    Inoue A. K., Hashimoto T., Chihara H., Koike C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1577I 495, 1577

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    P., Tielens A

    Jones A. P., Tielens A. G. G. M., Hollenbach D. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...469..740J 469, 740

    1996 doi

  77. [85]

    C., Witstok J., Concas A., Laporte N., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad189 , 529, L1

    Jones G. C., Witstok J., Concas A., Laporte N., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad189 , 529, L1

    2023 doi

  78. [86]

    Juvela M., Montillaud J., Ysard N., Lunttila T., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A..63J 556, A63

    2013 doi

  79. [87]

    Juvela M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...584A..94J 584, A94

    2015 doi

  80. [88]

    Kirkpatrick A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789..130K 789, 130

    2014 doi

  81. [89]

    Kobayashi H., Watanabe S.-i., Kimura H., Yamamoto T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Icar..201..395K 201, 395

    2009 doi

  82. [90]

    Kohandel M., Pallottini A., Ferrara A., Zanella A., Behrens C., Carniani S., Gallerani S., Vallini L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.3007K 487, 3007

    2019 doi

  83. [91]

    P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A..15K 579, A15

    K \"o hler M., Ysard N., Jones A. P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A..15K 579, A15

    2015 doi

  84. [92]

    Le F \`e vre O., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936965 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...1L 643, A1

    2020 doi

  85. [93]

    J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624L..13L 624, L13

    Le \'s niewska A., Micha owski M. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624L..13L 624, L13

    2019 doi

  86. [94]

    Li Q., Narayanan D., Torrey P., Dav \'e R., Vogelsberger M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507..548L 507, 548

    2021 doi

  87. [95]

    Liang L., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.1397L 489, 1397

    2019 doi

  88. [96]

    Liao C.-L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad148c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961..226L 961, 226

    2024 doi

  89. [97]

    Lin Q., Yang X., Li A., Witstok J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452372 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...694A..84L 694, A84

    2025 doi

  90. [98]

    C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad306c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..123L 965, 123

    Lower S., Narayanan D., Hu C.-Y., Privon G. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad306c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..123L 965, 123

    2024 doi

  91. [99]

    Ma X., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1324 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.1844M 487, 1844

    2019 doi

  92. [100]

    K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451L..70M 451, L70

    Mancini M., Schneider R., Graziani L., Valiante R., Dayal P., Maio U., Ciardi B., Hunt L. K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451L..70M 451, L70

    2015 doi

  93. [101]

    Markov V., Gallerani S., Ferrara A., Pallottini A., Parlanti E., Di Mascia F., Sommovigo L., Kohandel M., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02426-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs.tmp...20M

    2024 doi

  94. [102]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.553...51M 553, 51

    Marrone D. P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.553...51M 553, 51

    2018 doi

  95. [103]

    Martizzi D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.3766M 486, 3766

    2019 doi

  96. [104]

    Matthee J., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 , 963, 129

    2024 doi

  97. [105]

    M., Munoz J

    McKinney J., Cooper O., Casey C. M., Munoz J. B., Akins H., Lambrides E., Long A. S., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250214031M p. arXiv:2502.14031

    2025 doi arXiv

  98. [106]

    McKinnon R., Vogelsberger M., Torrey P., Marinacci F., Kannan R., 2018, @doi [MRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty1248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.2851M 478, 2851

    2018 doi

  99. [107]

    H., Burkhart B., Somerville R

    Menon S. H., Burkhart B., Somerville R. S., Thompson T. A., Sternberg A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.14591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240814591M p. arXiv:2408.14591

    2024 doi arXiv

  100. [108]

    A., Walter F., Di Mascia F., Decarli R., Neeleman M., Venemans B., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14539 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250214539M p

    Meyer R. A., Walter F., Di Mascia F., Decarli R., Neeleman M., Venemans B., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14539 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250214539M p. arXiv:2502.14539

    2025 doi arXiv

  101. [109]

    J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525644 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..80M 577, A80

    Micha owski M. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525644 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..80M 577, A80

    2015 doi

  102. [110]

    Mitsuhashi I., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5675 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971..161M 971, 161

    2024 doi

  103. [111]

    arXiv:2501.19384

    Mitsuhashi I., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.19384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250119384M p. arXiv:2501.19384

    2025 doi arXiv

  104. [112]

    arXiv:2310.20572

    Moullet A., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.20572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231020572M p. arXiv:2310.20572

    2023 doi

  105. [113]

    Narayanan D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/accf8d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951..100N 951, 100

    2023 doi

  106. [114]

    Narayanan D., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adb41c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...982....7N 982, 7

    2025 doi

  107. [115]

    Niculescu-Duvaz M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.4302N 515, 4302

    2022 doi

  108. [116]

    Palla M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.2407P 528, 2407

    2024 doi

  109. [117]

    Pallottini A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1383 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.1689P 487, 1689

    2019 doi

  110. [118]

    Pallottini A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.5621P 513, 5621

    2022 doi

  111. [119]

    S., Galametz M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.3152P 471, 3152

    Popping G., Somerville R. S., Galametz M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.3152P 471, 3152

    2017 doi

  112. [120]

    S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660..346P 660, 346

    Povich M. S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660..346P 660, 346

    2007 doi

  113. [121]

    Pozzi F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040258 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A..84P 653, A84

    2021 doi

  114. [123]

    G., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb , 968, 4

    Pérez-González P. G., et al., 2024, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb , 968, 4

    2024 doi

  115. [124]

    Reuter C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...902...78R 902, 78

    2020 doi

  116. [125]

    Romano L. E. C., Nagamine K., Hirashita H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1385 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.1441R 514, 1441

    2022 doi

  117. [126]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2068R 535, 2068

    Rowland L. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2068R 535, 2068

    2024 doi

  118. [127]

    E., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250110559R p

    Rowland L. E., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250110559R p. arXiv:2501.10559

    2025 doi arXiv

  119. [128]

    L., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.05273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240805273S p

    Sanders R. L., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.05273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240805273S p. arXiv:2408.05273

    2024 doi arXiv

  120. [129]

    arXiv:2310.00053

    Schneider R., Maiolino R., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.00053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231000053S p. arXiv:2310.00053

    2023 doi arXiv

  121. [130]

    Schouws S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928...31S 928, 31

    2022 doi

  122. [131]

    A., Kravtsov A

    Semenov V. A., Kravtsov A. V., Gnedin N. Y., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845..133S 845, 133

    2017 doi

  123. [132]

    J., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02059 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250302059S p

    Setton D. J., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02059 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250302059S p. arXiv:2503.02059

    2025 doi arXiv

  124. [133]

    Shahbandeh M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.6048S 523, 6048

    2023 doi

  125. [134]

    E., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adaf98 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981..167S 981, 167

    Shapley A. E., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adaf98 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981..167S 981, 167

    2025 doi

  126. [135]

    Shen X., Vogelsberger M., Nelson D., Tacchella S., Hernquist L., Springel V., Marinacci F., Torrey P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3794 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.5560S 510, 5560

    2022 doi

  127. [136]

    A., Ercolano B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/2234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696.2234S 696, 2234

    Shetty R., Kauffmann J., Schnee S., Goodman A. A., Ercolano B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/2234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696.2234S 696, 2234

    2009 doi

  128. [137]

    S., Yung L

    Somerville R. S., Yung L. Y. A., Lancaster L., Menon S., Sommovigo L., Finkelstein S. L., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250505442S p. arXiv:2505.05442

    2025 doi

  129. [138]

    Sommovigo L., Ferrara A., Pallottini A., Carniani S., Gallerani S., Decataldo D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497..956S 497, 956

    2020 doi

  130. [139]

    Sommovigo L., Ferrara A., Carniani S., Zanella A., Pallottini A., Gallerani S., Vallini L., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.4878S 503, 4878

    2021 doi

  131. [140]

    Sommovigo L., et al., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.3122S 513, 3122

    doi

  132. [141]

    Sommovigo L., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2997 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.5930S 517, 5930

    doi

  133. [142]

    Sugahara Y., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2a36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923....5S 923, 5

    2021 doi

  134. [143]

    Tamura Y., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874...27T 874, 27

    2019 doi

  135. [144]

    Tielens A. G. G. M., 1999, in Greenberg J. M., Li A., eds, NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C Vol. 523, Formation and Evolution of Solids in Space. p. 331, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ASIC..523..331T

    1999

  136. [145]

    Todini P., Ferrara A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04486.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.325..726T 325, 726

    2001

  137. [146]

    Tripodi R., et al., 2023, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Letters] 10.3847/2041-8213/acc58d , 946, L45

    2023 doi

  138. [147]

    Tripodi R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202349054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.220T 689, A220

    2024 doi

  139. [148]

    R., Battisti A., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad1464 , 523, 4654–4679

    Tsukui T., Wisnioski E., Krumholz M. R., Battisti A., 2023, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stad1464 , 523, 4654–4679

    2023 doi

  140. [149]

    K., Sandstrom K

    Utomo D., Chiang I.-D., Leroy A. K., Sandstrom K. M., Chastenet J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab05d3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874..141U 874, 141

    2019 doi

  141. [150]

    Valentini M., Gallerani S., Ferrara A., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab1992 , 507, 1

    2021 doi

  142. [151]

    Valentino F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A.138V 685, A138

    2024 doi

  143. [152]

    Vallini L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527...10V 527, 10

    2024 doi

  144. [153]

    P., Clay S

    Vijayan A. P., Clay S. J., Thomas P. A., Yates R. M., Wilkins S. M., Henriques B. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.4072V 489, 4072

    2019 doi

  145. [154]

    P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4999V 511, 4999

    Vijayan A. P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4999V 511, 4999

    2022 doi

  146. [155]

    Villanueva V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451490 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.133V 691, A133

    2024 doi

  147. [156]

    K., Richard J., Gallazzi A., Micha owski M

    Watson D., Christensen L., Knudsen K. K., Richard J., Gallazzi A., Micha owski M. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.519..327W 519, 327

    2015 doi

  148. [157]

    C., Draine B

    Weingartner J. C., Draine B. T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...548..296W 548, 296

    2001 doi

  149. [158]

    Witstok J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.1751W 515, 1751

    2022 doi

  150. [159]

    C., Maiolino R., Smit R., Schneider R., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1470 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3119W 523, 3119

    Witstok J., Jones G. C., Maiolino R., Smit R., Schneider R., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1470 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3119W 523, 3119

    doi

  151. [160]

    Witstok J., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06413-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.621..267W 621, 267

    doi

  152. [161]

    P., Verstraete L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936089 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A..88Y 631, A88

    Ysard N., Koehler M., Jimenez-Serra I., Jones A. P., Verstraete L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936089 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A..88Y 631, A88

    2019 doi

  153. [162]

    F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2171 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.2062V 534, 2062

    van Leeuwen I. F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2171 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.2062V 534, 2062

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.