Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 9 minor 65 references

Temperature-dependent dust opacity alone can overestimate high-redshift dust masses by 25–60%.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 19:37 UTC pith:HU2WCBMA

load-bearing objection Clean first quantification of lab-based T-dependent opacity bias on MBB dust masses; the 25–60% z∼8 number is a useful envelope but rests on a soft T(z)→Tmin mapping. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24262 v1 pith:HU2WCBMA submitted 2026-07-27 astro-ph.GA

Effects of temperature-dependent optical properties on the determination of interstellar dust masses

Lapo Fanciullo , Jonathan P. Marshall , Francisca Kemper , Peter Scicluna , Sundar Srinivasan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellar dustdust massmodified blackbodytemperature-dependent opacityβhigh redshiftfar-infraredsubmillimetre
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Interstellar dust masses are routinely recovered by fitting far-infrared emission with a modified blackbody whose opacity is treated as a simple power law. Laboratory data show that real dust opacity both steepens or flattens with temperature and carries broad spectral features that a pure power law cannot capture. This paper builds a grid of synthetic galaxy SEDs using temperature-dependent laboratory opacities for amorphous carbon and silicate, then recovers mass, temperature and β with the standard fitting procedure used in surveys. The comparison reveals systematic biases: fixed-β fits produce a temperature-dependent mass overestimate, while free-β fits trade that for a bias set by the rest-frame wavelength range sampled. At z~8 the temperature effect alone can inflate derived dust masses by 25–60% relative to local values, depending on star-formation activity and fitting choices. The result matters because dust-mass comparisons between the local and early Universe underpin claims about dust production timescales and the so-called dust budget crisis.

Core claim

When synthetic far-infrared photometry generated from laboratory temperature-dependent opacities is fitted with a conventional modified blackbody, fixing β produces a mass bias that rises with dust temperature, while leaving β free replaces that bias with one controlled by the rest-frame wavelength window; temperature dependence alone can therefore overestimate dust masses at z~8 by 25–60%.

What carries the argument

A grid of multi-temperature synthetic SEDs built from laboratory κ(λ,T) for a 30% BE-carbon + 70% E30R-silicate mix, fitted with single-temperature modified blackbodies (fixed or free β) so that the difference between input and recovered mass quantifies the bias.

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory optical constants of two specific amorphous materials, mixed 30/70 after a fixed aggregation correction, are taken as representative of real interstellar dust opacity and its temperature dependence.

What would settle it

Repeat the identical synthetic-observation and fitting pipeline with independent laboratory opacity curves for other amorphous silicates and carbons; if the 25–60% high-z mass overestimate disappears or reverses sign across those materials, the claimed bias is composition-specific rather than generic.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Fixed-β mass estimates at high redshift carry a temperature-driven overestimate of order tens of percent that can be partially corrected once T or z is known.
  • Free-β fits remain biased by the rest-frame wavelength sampling set by instrument choice and redshift, so mass comparisons across redshift bins must control for band coverage.
  • Power-law opacity models are intrinsically limited for precision dust-mass work once laboratory spectral features (knee, ankle) enter the fitted window.
  • The observed astronomical β–T anti-correlation receives a physical contribution from the laboratory temperature dependence of opacity, not only from fitting noise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dust-budget-crisis statements that rely on unmodified high-z masses may need downward revision of order 25–60% before being compared with stellar and supernova production rates.
  • Radial density profiles of AGB winds derived from multi-wavelength data will be distorted if the warmer inner dust is assigned the same opacity as the cooler outer dust.
  • A practical next step is a public library of temperature-dependent laboratory opacities already converted to mass-absorption coefficients so that survey pipelines can replace fixed power laws.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 9 minor

Summary. The paper quantifies the bias in dust masses derived from single-temperature modified blackbody (MBB) fits when the true dust opacity is temperature-dependent and non-power-law. The authors build synthetic far-IR/submm photometry for a grid of galaxies (Tmin = 20–80 K, PDR fraction fPDR = 0–1, temperature power-law index s = 6.5–8, z = 0–12) using laboratory optical properties of BE amorphous carbon (Mennella et al. 1998, with an aggregation correction from Ysard et al. 2018) and E30R silicate (Demyk et al. 2022) in a 30/70 mass mix, with κ(λ, T) interpolated over temperature. The synthetic photometry (17 Herschel/SCUBA-2/ALMA bands, realistic uncertainties, CMB correction, S/N and wavelength cuts) is fitted with a standard MBB with κ0, β calibrated on the 20 K experimental opacity, so that Mfit = Minput by construction for 20 K single-temperature dust. Main findings: (i) fixed-β fits overestimate mass increasingly with Tmin (≈60% between 20 and 80 K for fPDR=0; steeper for higher fPDR); (ii) free-β fits remove the temperature trend but retain a ~30% offset and become strongly sensitive to rest-frame wavelength sampling because the experimental opacity has broad "knee"/"ankle" features — producing up to factor-of-2 scatter in Mfit/Minput across redshift; (iii) combining an external T(z) relation with the z=0 linear Mfit–Tmin slopes, they infer a 25–60% mass overestimate at z∼8 relative to local determinations.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful and timely contribution. Dust mass systematics sit at the center of the high-redshift dust-budget debate, and this is, to my knowledge, the first experimentally grounded quantification of how temperature-dependent, non-power-law opacity propagates into modified blackbody mass estimates. The work has several concrete strengths: the pipeline is fully specified and publicly available (code on GitHub, data on Figshare with DOI), so the results are reproducible and extensible to other compositions; the normalization choice (κ anchored to the 20 K experimental opacity so that Mfit = Minput for single-temperature 20 K dust) is a clean, non-circular baseline that isolates the temperature-dependence effect; and the wavelength-sampling bias identified in §3.3 (Figs. 5–8) is a genuinely under-appreciated systematic for cross-redshift mass comparisons. The qualitative conclusions — fixed-β fits carry a temperature-dependent mass bias, free-β fits trade it for a wavelength-sampling bias — are robust within the model. The quantitative high-redshift envelope (25–60% at z∼8) is the most visible claim and currently the least well supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Fig. 9] The headline result (25–60% mass overestimate at z~8, quoted in the abstract) is not computed from the synthetic grid at high z but assembled in three extrapolation steps: (i) the Sommovigo et al. (2022) relation T ∝ (1+z)^0.42 — an SED-fit/observational dust temperature — is equated with Tmin, the cold endpoint of the delta-plus-power-law mass distribution; (ii) it is normalized to Tmin=20 K at z=0; (iii) the linear Mfit–Tmin slopes from §3.1, derived for z=0 seven-band fits, are applied at all z. Each step is questionable. Step (i) conflates two different temperature definitions: the paper's own Fig. 3 (bottom) shows Tfit differs systematically from both Tmin and Tmw, especially for fPDR>0, so mapping an observed T(z) onto Tmin can shift the inferred bias substantially in either direction. Step (iii) ignores that the paper's own band selection at z≥0.25 uses 4 bands with different rest
  2. [§2.1, carbon aggregation correction] The correction converting the measured BE-carbon opacity (aggregate laboratory samples) to compact grains is taken entirely from one modeling study (Ysard et al. 2018), which treats aromatic amorphous carbon, and is applied here to BE material. The correction has two parts: a factor 2.6 in κ0 at 100 μm and a flattening Δβ = −0.15. The κ0 part is largely absorbed by the deliberate 20 K normalization (Mfit = Minput by construction), but the Δβ part changes the slope of the carbon component at all temperatures and therefore feeds directly into βavg(T) (Table 1) and into the fitted biases in §3. Because the carbon is 30% of the mass and dominates at short wavelengths near the 'knee' region, the magnitude of the free-β, short-wavelength biases (Figs. 5–6) plausibly depends on this single-source correction. A sensitivity test (e.g., repeating a subset of the grid with no correction, or with th
  3. [§3.2 and §2.4 (free-β fits)] The free-β fits are performed on noiseless synthetic photometry, with the assigned uncertainties used only as χ² weights. The conclusion that 'adopting a variable β fit where possible will greatly reduce the temperature-dependent bias' (§3.2, and the fourth bullet of §5) is therefore demonstrated only in the infinite-S/N limit, where the T–β degeneracy does not operate. In real data — especially the 4-band high-z case — the T–β degeneracy with noise is the dominant failure mode of free-β fits (cf. Shetty et al. 2009a, which the authors cite in another context). This does not undermine the fixed-β results, but it does qualify a load-bearing recommendation of the paper. Either add Monte Carlo noise realizations for a representative subset of the grid, or explicitly restrict the free-β recommendation to the noiseless idealization and discuss how much S/N is needed for it to hold.
minor comments (9)
  1. [§2.4] Units typo: 'κ0 = 120 cm² g⁻²' should be cm² g⁻¹.
  2. [§4, first paragraph] '...and CMB heating. this is equivalent to fPDR and Tmin increasing with z.' — sentence begins with lowercase; also, fPDR increasing with z is an assumption, not an equivalence, and is used in Fig. 9 without being stated as such.
  3. [Table 2] The Herschel/SCUBA-2 uncertainties are in μJy/beam (confusion limits) while ALMA uncertainties are in μJy (total flux sensitivity). Since the synthetic sources are unresolved this is consistent, but the mixed units in one column will confuse readers; a clarifying sentence or footnote would help.
  4. [Fig. 9] State explicitly in the caption that the bottom panel uses fixed-β fits only and holds fPDR fixed with z; the abstract phrase 'depending on ... the choice of fit procedure' could otherwise be read as implying both fit procedures are included in the 25–60% envelope.
  5. [Fig. 1] Please mark the approximate wavelengths of the 'knee' (~150 μm) and 'ankle' (~600 μm) and indicate which material each feature belongs to; these features drive the results of §3.3 and readers will look for them here.
  6. [§2.2, discretization step] The convergence test for the temperature discretization is quoted only at λ=50 μm. Since the underestimate is worst for the highest-fPDR, lowest-Tmin models, please state whether δT=0.5 K is adequate for those corner cases.
  7. [Appendix B, Table B1] The C0,1 and C0,2 coefficients (−3.93e-3 and +2.60e-3) are of comparable magnitude, which makes the quadratic T-term dominate already near ~100 K; please double-check the values and units in Table B1 against Fig. B1.
  8. [Data Availability] The GitHub link is welcome; for long-term reproducibility, please also archive the exact code version used (e.g., a Zenodo DOI) alongside the Figshare data deposit.
  9. [§2.4, convergence failures] It would help readers to tabulate the ~62 non-converging fits' location in (Tmin, z, fPDR) space in one sentence, since they cluster near the CMB floor and their exclusion could slightly bias the high-z statistics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: bias is measured as departure from an explicit 20 K baseline, not derived from that baseline by construction.

full rationale

The paper builds synthetic SEDs from external laboratory opacities (Mennella et al. 1998 BE carbon; Demyk et al. 2022 E30R silicate), fits them with a standard power-law modified blackbody, and reports M_fit/M_input as the bias. The choice of fit opacity (β=1.59, κ0 at 100 μm from the 20 K experimental curve) is stated to force M_fit=M_input only for single-temperature 20 K dust, so that residual bias at other T, f_PDR, and wavelength samplings isolates temperature dependence and non-power-law shape. That is a controlled zero-point, not a self-definitional prediction: the reported T-dependent slopes and the free-β wavelength-range biases are outputs of the synthetic-fit comparison, not rearrangements of the 20 K normalization. Self-citation to Paper I supplies only the prior absolute-κ0 context and a similar synthetic-photometry workflow; the present central claim does not rest on Paper I’s numerical results. The z∼8 25–60% envelope is an application of those measured z=0 slopes to an external T(z) relation (Sommovigo et al. 2022), which may be a weak extrapolation but is not circular. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its fitted input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central bias numbers rest on a specific lab-derived opacity mix, a power-law-plus-delta temperature distribution, optical thinness, and the choice to normalize κ at 20 K. None of these are derived inside the paper; they are imported modeling choices whose variation the authors themselves flag as future work.

free parameters (4)
  • carbon/silicate mass fraction = 0.3 / 0.7
    Fixed at 30% BE carbon + 70% E30R silicate to match typical MW models; quantitative bias amplitudes change with composition.
  • aggregation-enhancement correction for carbon = 2.6, Δβ=−0.15
    Ysard et al. (2018) power-law factors (κ ratio 2.6 at 100 μm, Δβ = −0.15) applied by hand to convert aggregate lab data to compact-grain κ.
  • reference opacity (κ0, β) at 20 K = κ100μm=120 cm² g⁻¹, β=1.59
    Chosen so M_fit ≡ M_input at 20 K single-T; sets the zero-point of all subsequent bias ratios.
  • temperature-distribution index s and f_PDR grid = s=7.5 fiducial; f_PDR=0 and 1 extremes
    s scanned 6.5–8.0 and f_PDR 0–1; the quoted 25–60% range is the envelope over this grid under Sommovigo T(z).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Laboratory optical constants of BE carbon and E30R silicate (after compact-grain correction) are representative of interstellar dust opacity and its T-dependence.
    Stated explicitly in §1; all quantitative bias numbers inherit this assumption.
  • domain assumption Dust emission is optically thin at λ>50 μm so the SED is a linear sum of single-T components.
    §2.2–2.3; used to construct Eq. 6.
  • domain assumption Carbon and silicate grains share the same temperature distribution (difference of a few K neglected).
    §2.2; simplifies the multi-component sum.
  • domain assumption Dust temperature follows a delta at T_min plus a power-law tail of index −s (Dale/Kovács form).
    Eq. 3; toy model whose extremes bracket quiescent-to-starburst galaxies.
  • standard math Mass-weighted temperature formula (Eq. 5) remains accurate to ≲1% for the adopted s and T_max.
    Derived in Appendix A under the paper’s parameter cuts.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 25643 in / 2817 out tokens · 57877 ms · 2026-07-31T19:37:14.438047+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate measurements of interstellar dust mass are key to answering several astrophysical questions. A common method of obtaining the mass is to fit the far-infrared thermal emission of the dust with a modified blackbody model; however, this method is subject to several systematics. In particular, how temperature-dependent dust optical properties affect fit results has received little attention. We provide the first quantification of this effect based on experimental measurements of optical properties from the scientific literature. We created a grid of synthetic observations for variable-opacity dust and fitted it with a modified blackbody model; the difference between the input properties of synthetic observations and the values derived from the fit provides a measure of the bias induced by the temperature dependence. We find that fixing the value of the opacity power law index $\beta$ introduces a temperature-dependent bias on the fit, while keeping $\beta$ as a free parameter introduces a bias that depends mainly on the wavelength range used. For instance, depending on the properties of the observed object and on the choice of fit procedure, temperature dependence alone can induce an overestimate of 25-60% in dust masses at high redshift ($z \sim 8$). Our findings highlight the limitations of power laws as opacity models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24262 by Francisca Kemper, Jonathan P. Marshall, Lapo Fanciullo, Peter Scicluna, Sundar Srinivasan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Temperature dependence of dust opacity (colored curves) for our standard dust composition of 30% BE carbon and 70% E30R silicate, com￾pared to a power law (dotted black line). The black symbols indicate the central wavelengths of the seven standard bands for 𝑧 = 0 (see Section 2.4) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Different shapes of the SED for 𝑓PDR = 0 (single-temperature dust; blue line) and 𝑓PDR = 1 (power law temperature distribution; orange line). Dashed orange lines are individual temperature components for the SED with 𝑓PDR = 1. Only one every ten dashed lines is plotted, for legibility. Both SEDs use 𝑇min = 20 K; the multi-temperature SED uses 𝑠 = 7.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results of the fixed-𝛽 fits. Top panel: 𝑀fit normalized by 𝑀input. The horizontal grey line corresponds to 𝑀fit = 𝑀input. Bottom panel: 𝑇fit (bottom) as a function of 𝑇min. The dotted lines show 𝑇mw as a function of 𝑇min for 𝑓PDR = 0, 0.1 and 1. In the case 𝑓PDR = 0 (blue dotted line), 𝑇mw = 𝑇min. Error bars show the parameter’s standard deviation, from the fit. fraction 𝑓PDR. This is evident in [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of the free-𝛽 fits. Top panel: 𝑀fit/𝑀input as a function of 𝑇min. The horizontal grey line corresponds to 𝑀fit = 𝑀input. Middle panel: 𝑇fit as a function of 𝑇min. The dotted lines show 𝑇mw for the different values of 𝑓PDR. Bottom panel: 𝛽fit as a function of 𝑇min. The grey line indicates the expected value of 𝛽 for 𝑇 = 𝑇min, interpolated from the values in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of the choice of bands on fit results. Top panel: A 20 K SED with non-power law opacity (black curve), photometry for 7 bands (colored dots), and three modified blackbody fits to the photometry (colored curves). Dots are color-coded depending on the fits they are used in. Dots used in two separate fits are bicolor. Color code: blue uses 4 bands between 70 and 250 𝜇m; red uses 4 bands between 160 and… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results of a free-𝛽 fit (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Effect of redshift on the recovered value of dust mass, shown for 𝑇min = 40 K, and for both fixed and free 𝛽 fits. Different redshifts correspond to different wavelength samplings and therefore different values of the bias on 𝑀fit. The result is a significant scatter in 𝑀fit/𝑀input. This is more notable for free-𝛽 fits, as mentioned in Section 3.2. (rest-frame) wavelength sampling. This has important conse… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results of a free-𝛽 fit (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evolution of the expected value of 𝑇min (top) and 𝑀fit/𝑀input (bottom) as a function of redshift, as predicted by Sommovigo’s 𝑇 (𝑧) formula (see text) and the linear 𝑇min– 𝑀fit/𝑀input relation found in Section 3.1. important implications for the study of the ISM in the most intense star-forming regions in the local Universe. Another issue affected by our finding is the estimate of dust formation around evo… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , year = 1994, month = nov, volume =

    Reassessment of millimetre-wave absorption coefficients in interstellar silicate grains. , year = 1994, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1038/372243a0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/372243a0 1994

  2. [2]

    Survey strategy, observations, and sample properties of 118 star-forming galaxies at 4 < z < 6

    The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Survey strategy, observations, and sample properties of 118 star-forming galaxies at 4 < z < 6. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936965 , archivePrefix =. 1910.09517 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Survey Description. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/67 , archivePrefix =. 1607.06768 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Reionization Era Bright Emission Line Survey: Selection and Characterization of Luminous Interstellar Medium Reservoirs in the z > 6.5 Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4a , archivePrefix =. 2106.13719 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Point-source flux calibration for scan maps

    The Herschel-PACS photometer calibration. Point-source flux calibration for scan maps. Experimental Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10686-013-9352-3 , archivePrefix =. 1309.6099 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Flux calibration of the Herschel ^ ★ -SPIRE photometer. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt948 , archivePrefix =. 1306.1217 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Temperature Dependence of the Submillimeter Absorption Coefficient of Amorphous Silicate Grains. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/432966 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/432966

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Far-infrared spectral energy distribution fitting for galaxies near and far. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21455.x , archivePrefix =. 1206.1595 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    A dusty dawn: galactic dust buildup at z 5. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf118 , archivePrefix =. 2408.08962 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    The global dust SED: tracing the nature and evolution of dust with DustEM. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015292 , archivePrefix =. 1010.2769 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    A simple model to interpret the ultraviolet, optical and infrared emission from galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x , archivePrefix =. 0806.1020 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    On the Effect of the Cosmic Microwave Background in High-redshift (Sub-)millimeter Observations. , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/13 , archivePrefix =. 1302.0844 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    The Infrared Spectral Energy Distribution of Normal Star-forming Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319077 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/319077

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    The Infrared Spectral Energy Distribution of Normal Star-forming Galaxies: Calibration at Far-Infrared and Submillimeter Wavelengths. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341632 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0205085 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Interstellar extinction and polarization - a spheroidal dust grain approach perspective. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16281.x , archivePrefix =. 1001.0655 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    SCUBA-2: on-sky calibration using submillimetre standard sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt090 , archivePrefix =. 1301.3773 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Low temperature MIR to submillimeter mass absorption coefficient of interstellar dust analogues. I. Mg-rich glassy silicates. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629711 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629711

  21. [21]

    Low-temperature MIR to submillimeter mass absorption coefficient of interstellar dust analogues. II. Mg and Fe-rich amorphous silicates. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730944 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730944

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Extended Dust Emission from Nearby Evolved Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1422 , archivePrefix =. 1805.10599 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Low-temperature optical constants of amorphous silicate dust analogues. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243815 , archivePrefix =. 2209.06513 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Infrared Emission from Interstellar Dust. IV. The Silicate-Graphite-PAH Model in the Post-Spitzer Era. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/511055 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608003 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Dust Masses, PAH Abundances, and Starlight Intensities in the SINGS Galaxy Sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/518306 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703213 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium. 2011

    2011

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Using the Starlight Polarization Efficiency Integral to Constrain Shapes and Porosities of Interstellar Grains. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0050 , archivePrefix =. 2101.07277 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Systematic errors in dust mass determinations: insights from laboratory opacity measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2911 , archivePrefix =. 2009.10304 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    The rise and fall of dust in the Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae403 , archivePrefix =. 2402.05181 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Blue monsters at z > 10: Where all their dust has gone. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452707 , archivePrefix =. 2410.19042 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Can planet formation resolve the dust budget crisis in high-redshift galaxies?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2162 , archivePrefix =. 1708.07053 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Dust and Gas in the Magellanic Clouds from the HERITAGE Herschel Key Project. I. Dust Properties and Insights into the Origin of the Submillimeter Excess Emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/85 , archivePrefix =. 1406.6066 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    , eprint =

    SCUBA observations of galaxies with metallicity measurements: a new method for determining the relation between submillimetre luminosity and dust mass. , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05660.x , adsurl =

    arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    The global dust modelling framework THEMIS. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630225 , archivePrefix =. 1703.00775 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Comparison of methods for estimating the (T) relation

    The degeneracy between dust colour temperature and spectral index. Comparison of methods for estimating the (T) relation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220910 , archivePrefix =. 1305.2130 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Galactic cold cores. V. Dust opacity. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423788 , archivePrefix =. 1501.07092 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The Absence of Crystalline Silicates in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/421339 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0403609 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Dust evolution in the transition towards the denser ISM: impact on dust temperature, opacity, and spectral index. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525646 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525646

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Far-infrared Properties of Spitzer-selected Luminous Starbursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/29 , archivePrefix =. 1004.0819 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    On the dust temperatures of high-redshift galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2134 , archivePrefix =. 1902.10727 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    A Decade of SCUBA-2: A Comprehensive Guide to Calibrating 450 m and 850 m Continuum Data at the JCMT. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac18bf , archivePrefix =. 2107.13558 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Hunter, J. D. , Title =. Computing In Science & Engineering , Volume =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Temperature Dependence of the Absorption Coefficient of Cosmic Analog Grains in the Wavelength Range 20 Microns to 2 Millimeters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305415 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/305415

  44. [44]

    Far-infrared to millimeter astrophysical dust emission. I. A model based on physical properties of amorphous solids. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065771 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0701226 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Harris and K

    Charles R. Harris and K. Jarrod Millman and St. Array programming with. 2020 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , publisher =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  46. [46]

    Dust coagulation and fragmentation in molecular clouds. I. How collisions between dust aggregates alter the dust size distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811158 , archivePrefix =. 0906.1770 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Dust coagulation and fragmentation in molecular clouds. II. The opacity of the dust aggregate size distribution. , keywords =. 2011. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117058 , archivePrefix =. 1106.3265 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8092754 , url =

    The pandas development team , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8092754 , url =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8092754

  49. [49]

    Far-infrared to millimeter astrophysical dust emission. II. Comparison of the two-level systems (TLS) model with astronomical data. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116862 , archivePrefix =. 1107.5179 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Cosmological Physics. 1999

    1999

  51. [51]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14712174 , url =

    Fouesneau, Morgan , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14712174 , url =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14712174

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    The dust budget crisis in high-redshift submillimetre galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu605 , archivePrefix =. 1403.2995 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    The CO-to-H _ 2 Conversion Factor and Dust-to-gas Ratio on Kiloparsec Scales in Nearby Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/5 , archivePrefix =. 1212.1208 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    The Effect of Noise on the Dust Temperature-Spectral Index Correlation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/676 , archivePrefix =. 0902.0636 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    The Effect of Line-of-Sight Temperature Variation and Noise on Dust Continuum Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/2234 , archivePrefix =. 0902.3477 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    The ALMA REBELS Survey: cosmic dust temperature evolution out to z 7. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac302 , archivePrefix =. 2202.01227 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Realistic multitemperature dust: how well can we constrain the dust properties of high-redshift galaxies?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf897 , archivePrefix =. 2505.20105 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    doi:10.5479/ADS/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015R , adsurl =

    SVO Filter Profile Service Version 1.0. doi:10.5479/ADS/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015R , adsurl =

    doi:10.5479/ads/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015r

  60. [60]

    XIV.0 Scientific Meeting (virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society , year = 2020, month = jul, eid =

    The SVO Filter Profile Service. XIV.0 Scientific Meeting (virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society , year = 2020, month = jul, eid =

    2020

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Photometric segregation of dwarf and giant FGK stars using the SVO Filter Profile Service and photometric tools. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449998 , archivePrefix =. 2406.03310 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Light Scattering by Small Particles

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Dust Grain-Size Distributions and Extinction in the Milky Way, Large Magellanic Cloud, and Small Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/318651 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008146 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    An empirical study of dust properties at the earliest epochs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1470 , archivePrefix =. 2305.09714 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    The optical properties of dust: the effects of composition, size, and structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833386 , archivePrefix =. 1806.05420 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv