REVIEW 1 cited by
Realistic Multi-temperature Dust: How Well Can We Constrain the Dust Properties of High-redshift Galaxies?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Realistic Multi-temperature Dust: How Well Can We Constrain the Dust Properties of High-redshift Galaxies?
read the original abstract
Determining the dust properties of high-redshift galaxies from their far-infrared continuum emission is challenging due to limited multi-frequency data. As a result, the dust spectral energy distribution (SED) is often modeled as a single-temperature modified blackbody. We assess the accuracy of the single-temperature approximation by constructing realistic dust SEDs using a physically motivated prescription where the dust temperature probability distribution function (PDF) is described by a skewed normal distribution. This approach captures the complexity of the mass-weighted and luminosity-weighted temperature PDFs of simulated galaxies and quasars, and yields far-infrared SEDs that match high-redshift observations. We explore how varying the mean temperature ($\bar{T}_d$), width, and skewness of the temperature PDF affects the recovery of the dust mass, IR luminosity, and dust emissivity index $\beta_d$ at z=7. Fitting the dust SEDs with a single-temperature approximation, we find that dust masses are generally well-recovered, although they may be underestimated by up to 0.6 dex for broad temperature distributions with a low $\bar{T}_d <$ 40 K, as seen in some high-redshift quasars and/or evolved galaxies. IR luminosities are generally recovered within the $1\sigma$ uncertainty (< 0.3 dex), except at $\bar{T}_d >$ 80 K, where the peak shifts well beyond ALMA's wavelength coverage. The inferred dust emissivity index is consistently shallower than the input one ($\beta_d$=2) due to the effect of multi-temperature dust, suggesting that a steep $\beta_d$ may probe dust composition and grain size variations. With larger galaxy samples and well-sampled dust SEDs, systematic errors from multi-temperature dust may dominate over fitting uncertainties and should thus be considered.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Effects of temperature-dependent optical properties on the determination of interstellar dust masses
Using lab-measured temperature-dependent opacities, fixed-β modified-blackbody fits overestimate high-z dust masses by 25–60% from temperature dependence alone.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.