Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Exploring Timeline Control for Facial Motion Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes timeline control for facial motion generation: a user-specified, frame-level schedule of facial actions is realized by a diffusion model trained on automatically annotated motion intervals, with text commands…

desk verdict Timeline control for facial motion generation is a real new idea, but the headline alignment metric is a closed loop: TAS uses the same TICC annotator that created the training labels, so the central claim of precise temporal control is not yet independently supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20861 v1 pith:ZXEGE52P submitted 2025-05-27 cs.CV

Yifeng Ma , Jinwei Qi , Chaonan Ji , Peng Zhang , Bang Zhang , Zhidong Deng , Liefeng Bo This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords facialmotiongenerationtimelinecontroldiffusionmodelactionannotationToeplitzInverseCovariance-basedClusteringblendshapestext-to-motion3Dface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces timeline control as a new way to steer facial motion generation: instead of relying on audio or coarse text, a user supplies a multi-track schedule of facial actions, such as a brow raise from frame 10 to 30 and a smile from frame 14 to 43. To obtain training data without heavy manual labeling, the authors apply Toeplitz Inverse Covariance-based Clustering (TICC) to segment natural facial motion sequences into action intervals and cluster similar patterns, so that only a few examples per cluster need human inspection. They then train a diffusion-based generator with a base-branch architecture that decouples facial regions for accuracy while preserving necessary cross-region couplings. The paper claims the resulting model produces natural facial motions whose onsets and offsets align with the input timeline, and that natural language descriptions can be converted into timelines automatically. If true, animators and avatar builders gain precise frame-level control that audio and text signals cannot provide.

What carries the argument

The central object is the timeline itself, encoded as a 16-dimensional per-frame binary vector in which each dimension marks whether a specific facial action is active. TICC, a Toeplitz Inverse Covariance-based Clustering method, segments multivariate facial-motion time series into intervals with uniform motion patterns and clusters similar intervals, so a human needs to label only a few representative intervals per cluster to obtain frame-level annotations for the whole dataset. The generation model is a diffusion transformer with a base network shared across regions and branch networks per region; timeline tokens are injected via cross-attention at every layer, always using the original timetable to avoid temporal drift. This machinery carries the argument by making annotation and generation share the same representation, so the model is trained to produce motions that TICC-style segmentation would parse back into the intended intervals.

What would settle it

Take the test timelines, generate videos with the trained model, and have human annotators label action intervals frame by frame while blinded to the input timelines, then compute macro-F1 between human labels and the input timelines. If this independently measured alignment is substantially lower than the reported TAS of 0.84, for instance below roughly 0.7, the claim that generated motions align with user timelines rests on the segmentation method's own conventions rather than on observable motion timing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that frame-level timeline control for facial motion generation is achievable by pairing an unsupervised time-series analysis, TICC, with a diffusion model whose base network models global facial couplings and whose branch networks generate each region's motion conditioned only on that region's timeline. The paper demonstrates the full pipeline: annotate action intervals, train the generator, render photorealistic videos, and translate language into timelines. It reports macro-F1 annotation accuracy of 0.90 for brows, 0.91 for eyes, and 0.87 for mouth, and reports a Timeline Alignment Score (TAS) of 0.84 for the best generation configuration, with user-study agreement of 89% for accuracy and 86% for naturalness. The load-bearing design is the base-branch split: full decoupling loses naturalness, full coupling loses precision, so the authors use upper-face, lower-face, and pose-and-other branches while the base network carries cross-region coupling. This turns timeline control into a concrete representation and a trainable objective rather than a post-hoc editing step.

Load-bearing premise

The evaluation assumes that applying the same TICC or threshold-based segmentation to generated videos and measuring agreement with the input timeline is a valid test of timeline accuracy, even though the same segmentation method produced the training annotations, so high scores may reflect that the model learned to satisfy TICC's segmentation biases rather than independently verified timing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can specify multi-track timelines with independent start and end frames for actions in different facial regions, such as a brow raise overlapping a smile.
  • The TICC-based annotation pipeline doubles as an interval detector for unseen videos, enabling automated evaluation and future dataset construction without manual frame labeling.
  • Text-guided generation gains an editable timing layer: a language model converts a sentence into a timeline that a user can then adjust frame by frame.
  • The base-branch design balances accuracy and naturalness, preventing unwanted coupling effects such as an unintended brow lower during a smile while preserving subtle natural couplings such as head motion accompanying gaze shifts.
  • Annotation quality depends strongly on the motion descriptor: replacing ARKit blendshapes with Action Units drops brow annotation macro-F1 from 0.90 to 0.73, so descriptor fidelity is a key factor for the whole pipeline.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because TICC defines the action vocabulary through clustering, the method implicitly inherits cluster granularity: subcategories such as a significant versus moderate brow raise exist but are collapsed into one category, and a future extension could expose these subcategories as separate timeline channels.
  • The base-branch architecture is a general template for conditional generation with partially independent controls, and it could apply to other correlated sub-systems such as body motion with hand gestures, where a shared base encodes coordination and branches enforce per-part precision.
  • The evaluation metric could be gamed by any model that produces cleanly segmentable motion, since the same TICC machinery both created the training labels and scores the output; an independent human-annotated gold standard would make the timeline-alignment claim more persuasive.
  • The reliance on an in-house blendshape detector means portability depends on that detector's accuracy, and a publicly available descriptor with comparable precision would make the annotation pipeline reproducible outside the authors' environment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces timeline control for facial motion generation: users specify multi-track, frame-level timelines of facial actions (brow, eye, mouth, gaze, head) and a diffusion-based model generates a natural facial motion sequence aligned with those timelines. To obtain training annotations, the authors use Toeplitz Inverse Covariance-based Clustering (TICC) on facial motion descriptor time series, with manual inspection of a few intervals per cluster; threshold-based detection is used for eye closure, gaze, and head pose. The generation model uses a base-branch architecture to balance cross-region motion coupling against region-level control accuracy, and text inputs are converted to timelines via ChatGPT. Experiments on RealTalk report annotation Macro-F1 scores, a Timeline Alignment Score (TAS) for generated motion, an ablation study, and a 21-participant user study.

Significance. If validated, the paper would open a practically useful control modality for facial animation: precise, editable temporal control of individual facial actions, which audio- and text-driven methods do not offer. The paper's strengths include the formulation of a new control signal, a labor-efficient annotation pipeline based on TICC, a thoughtful base-branch architecture with ablations supporting its design, and a user study that partially checks the perceived alignment of generated motions. The central limitation is that the quantitative alignment evidence rests on a closed-loop evaluation: TAS is computed with the same TICC/threshold annotator that produced the training labels, and the annotation accuracy numbers are hyperparameter-optimized on the same 50-video manual set. These issues do not invalidate the approach, but they mean the headline claim of precise frame-level timeline alignment is not yet independently established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, 'Evaluation Metric' vs. Sec. 3.1, 'Detect Facial Motion for Unseen Videos'] The Timeline Alignment Score (TAS) is computed by running the same TICC/threshold annotator on generated videos that was used to create the training labels in Sec. 3.1. The generation model is therefore trained to reproduce TICC's segmentation and clustering biases, and a high TAS can reflect that generated motions parse cleanly under that annotator rather than that onset/offset times are correct as judged by humans. This makes the central claim of 'accurately aligned with input timelines' depend on a metric that shares its decision procedure with the training target. Please add an independent frame-level human evaluation on generated videos, or at minimum an external action-unit or expression annotator, and report agreement on start/end frames separately from categorical agreement.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, 'Quantitative results'] The reported annotation Macro-F1 scores (brow 0.90, eye 0.91, mouth 0.87; eye closure 0.95, pose 0.87, gaze 0.89) are obtained after selecting the number of clusters and beta on the same 50 manually annotated videos used for evaluation. This is a selection-on-the-test-set procedure, so the scores are optimistic. The 'preliminary test' on 50 unseen videos is a step in the right direction, but it is unclear that the hyperparameters were fixed without using those videos. Please report a proper held-out split or cross-validation, with hyperparameters chosen on training folds only.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, 'User Study'] The user study is the only partially independent check of the generated-motion alignment, but the paper reports only aggregate percentages (89% accuracy, 86% naturalness) with no confidence intervals and no per-action-type or per-participant breakdown. Since 15 pairs per condition per participant is a modest sample, please report the number of ratings, confidence intervals, and, if possible, per-action analysis (for example, brow versus mouth onset timing) to establish that the perceived alignment holds across the action classes claimed in Table 1.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'To model the timeline control capability, We first annotate...' has an incorrect capital 'We' after a comma; please correct the capitalization.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, 'Generation Model G'] There is a duplicated article in 'we use the the expression, eye, and pose coefficients'; please remove the repeated 'the'.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, 'User Study'] The text says 'Fig. 9 shows the results' for the user study, but Fig. 9 is the qualitative ablation figure; the user study results appear to be in Fig. 10. Please fix the cross-reference.
  4. [Table 2] The table headers Var, FID_fm, FID_delta_fm, and SND are defined only in the text of Sec. 4.2; please add definitions in the table caption or footnote for readability.
  5. [Sec. 4.2, 'Comparisons with previous methods'] The comparison with AgentAvatar and InstructAvatar is qualitative only and placed in the supplementary video. Since neither method provides code, this is understandable, but please state more explicitly what the qualitative comparison shows and how the reader can access the video.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

TAS is computed with the same TICC/threshold annotator used to create training labels (Sec. 4.2 vs Sec. 3.1), so the central timeline-alignment claim rests on a closed-loop metric; a frame-level human check on generated videos is needed.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3.1 'Detect Facial Motion for Unseen Videos'; Sec. 4.2 'Evaluation Metric']
    "After learning various facial motion patterns from the data, TICC can also be applied to previously unseen facial motion sequences and detect facial action intervals. We use this function to assess the accuracy of facial motion generation in our evaluation. ... To evaluate accuracy, we use TICC or threshold-based approach to annotate facial motion intervals within the generated video. These intervals are then compared to the input timeline to calculate the macro-F1 score."

    The same TICC/threshold interval detector is used twice: in Sec. 3.1 it produces the frame-level action annotations that supervise the diffusion model, and in Sec. 4.2 it is re-run on generated videos to compute the Timeline Alignment Score. The model is therefore trained to produce motions that TICC segments and clusters cleanly, and TAS then rewards exactly that behavior. A generated motion that a human would judge misaligned can receive a high TAS if TICC parses it into the requested intervals, while a human-aligned motion that TICC segments differently is penalized.

full rationale

This is an empirical paper rather than a formal derivation, so the circularity appears in the evaluation loop rather than in equations. The central quantitative evidence for 'accurately aligned with input timelines' is the Timeline Alignment Score, which is computed by annotating generated videos with the same TICC/threshold procedure that created the frame-level training labels. This makes the metric partially self-confirming: high TAS can reflect that the generator has learned TICC's segmentation and clustering biases, not that a human observer would agree with the detected onsets and offsets. The manual 50-video macro-F1 evaluation in Sec. 4.1 gives the annotator some independent support against human labels on real videos, and the user study provides a coarse independent check, but neither verifies frame-level precision on generated outputs. Distributional metrics (FID, SND, Var) do not depend on TICC and give the architecture study independent content. On balance, the timeline-alignment claim is partially forced by the evaluator/training-label overlap, but not fully circular because of the manual annotation check and user study; score 5.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central pipeline rests on an unverified descriptor stack and on TICC's ability to convert blendshape time series into human-meaningful action intervals. The paper contributes no released data or code to independently audit either. The main free parameters are TICC settings and threshold/dropout values chosen by ablation or by optimizing the evaluation metric. No novel physical or ontological entities are introduced; timeline control is a condition representation, not a postulated entity.

free parameters (6)
  • TICC number of valid clusters (brow/eye/mouth) = 9 / 8 / 9
    Chosen as the setting with the highest macro-F1 on the manually annotated 50-video set, as shown in Figure 6.
  • TICC beta = 5 for each region
    Chosen by macro-F1 on the same evaluation set, as shown in Figure 7; controls temporal smoothness of segmentation.
  • Null sequence length and value = length 100, value -1
    Ad hoc separator between concatenated video clips; no sensitivity analysis reported.
  • Eye closure, gaze, and head pose thresholds = not specified
    Threshold-based annotation is used for eyeBlink, gaze, and head pose; the actual threshold values are not reported.
  • Condition dropout probabilities = 0.5 per region, 0.1 all dropped, 0.1 all kept
    Selected from ablation variants (drop 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) as the best trade-off between accuracy and naturalness.
  • Branch network depth = 2 layers out of 8 total
    Selected from ablation branchL1/L2/L3/L4; too many branch layers reportedly reduce naturalness.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ARKit blendshape coefficients produced by an in-house detector and FaceVerse 3DMM coefficients fully capture the facial actions of interest.
    The entire annotation and generation pipeline is defined on these descriptors; the detector is not public, so this premise cannot be independently checked.
  • domain assumption Facial motions in the dataset are largely symmetrical, so left-side coefficients suffice.
    Section 3.1 states left-side coefficients are used to simplify analysis; asymmetric expressions are mentioned later as possible only because FaceVerse decouples left and right, which somewhat contradicts the simplification.
  • domain assumption TICC clusters of intervals correspond to human-perceivable facial action categories after manual naming.
    The annotation quality depends on this mapping; the paper inspects a few intervals per cluster to assign labels.
  • domain assumption RealTalk dataset is representative of natural facial motions and diverse enough for the training set.
    The dataset section chooses RealTalk for authentic expressions; no analysis of subject or expression distribution is given.
  • domain assumption ChatGPT text-to-timeline conversion is reliable enough for text-guided use.
    Section 3.3 relies on ChatGPT with a few manually annotated examples; only one qualitative example is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Timeline Control for Facial Motion Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXEGE52P

@misc{pith2026250520861,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Timeline Control for Facial Motion Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXEGE52P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20861}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a new control signal for facial motion generation: timeline control. Compared to audio and text signals, timelines provide more fine-grained control, such as generating specific facial motions with precise timing. Users can specify a multi-track timeline of facial actions arranged in temporal intervals, allowing precise control over the timing of each action. To model the timeline control capability, We first annotate the time intervals of facial actions in natural facial motion sequences at a frame-level granularity. This process is facilitated by Toeplitz Inverse Covariance-based Clustering to minimize human labor. Based on the annotations, we propose a diffusion-based generation model capable of generating facial motions that are natural and accurately aligned with input timelines. Our method supports text-guided motion generation by using ChatGPT to convert text into timelines. Experimental results show that our method can annotate facial action intervals with satisfactory accuracy, and produces natural facial motions accurately aligned with timelines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20861 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We introduce a new control signal for facial motion generation: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The pipeline of frame-level facial motion annotation (using brow motions as an example). We first extract facial motion descriptors (blendshapes) from natural facial motion videos and concatenate the results to create a facial motion time series for time series analysis. This analysis can simultaneously segment the sequence into a series of motion patterns and cluster similar patterns, resulting in multiple clusters… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of generation model. (a) Base-Branch Design. The base network takes the timelines of all facial regions as input and outputs base features that model the global facial motion couplings. Through timeline selection, each region’s timeline is directed to its respective branch network. Since head pose is interconnected with all facial movements, the pose branch receives timelines of all regions. Each branch… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The annotation accuracy for different number of clusters. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The annotation accuracy in brows for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative results of facial motion generation from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative results of ablation study. Green arrows in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Our method supports text-guided facial motion genera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Facetalk: Audio-driven motion diffusion for neural parametric head models

    Shivangi Aneja, Justus Thies, Angela Dai, and Matthias Nießner. Facetalk: Audio-driven motion diffusion for neural parametric head models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21263–21273, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Teach: Temporal action composition for 3d hu- mans

    Nikos Athanasiou, Mathis Petrovich, Michael J Black, and G¨ul Varol. Teach: Temporal action composition for 3d hu- mans. In2022 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 414–423. IEEE, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Seamless human motion composition with blended posi- tional encodings

    German Barquero, Sergio Escalera, and Cristina Palmero. Seamless human motion composition with blended posi- tional encodings. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 457–469, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Video generation models as world simulators

    Tim Brooks, Bill Peebles, Connor Holmes, Will DePue, Yufei Guo, Li Jing, David Schnurr, Joe Taylor, Troy Luh- man, Eric Luhman, et al. Video generation models as world simulators. 2024.URL https://openai. com/research/video- generation-models-as-world-simulators, 3, 2024. 1, 2

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Animated conversation: rule- based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken in- tonation for multiple conversational agents

    Justine Cassell, Catherine Pelachaud, Norman Badler, Mark Steedman, Brett Achorn, Tripp Becket, Brett Douville, Scott Prevost, and Matthew Stone. Animated conversation: rule- based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken in- tonation for multiple conversational agents. InProceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and in- tera...

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    Echomimic: Lifelike audio-driven por- trait animations through editable landmark conditions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08136, 2024

    Zhiyuan Chen, Jiajiong Cao, Zhiquan Chen, Yuming Li, and Chenguang Ma. Echomimic: Lifelike audio-driven por- trait animations through editable landmark conditions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08136, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Capture, learning, and syn- thesis of 3d speaking styles

    Daniel Cudeiro, Timo Bolkart, Cassidy Laidlaw, Anurag Ranjan, and Michael J Black. Capture, learning, and syn- thesis of 3d speaking styles. InCVPR, pages 10101–10111,

    work page

  8. [8]

    Emotional speech-driven animation with content-emotion disentangle- ment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08990, 2023

    Radek Dan ˇeˇcek, Kiran Chhatre, Shashank Tripathi, Yan- dong Wen, Michael J Black, and Timo Bolkart. Emotional speech-driven animation with content-emotion disentangle- ment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08990, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Spotformer: Multi-scale spatio-temporal transformer for fa- cial expression spotting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20799,

    Yicheng Deng, Hideaki Hayashi, and Hajime Nagahara. Spotformer: Multi-scale spatio-temporal transformer for fa- cial expression spotting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20799,

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Facial action coding system (facs).A Human Face, Salt Lake City, 2002

    Paul Ekman. Facial action coding system (facs).A Human Face, Salt Lake City, 2002. 2

    2002

  3. [11]

    Unitalker: Scaling up audio-driven 3d facial animation through a unified model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00762,

    Xiangyu Fan, Jiaqi Li, Zhiqian Lin, Weiye Xiao, and Lei Yang. Unitalker: Scaling up audio-driven 3d facial animation through a unified model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00762,

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Faceformer: Speech-driven 3d facial anima- tion with transformers

    Yingruo Fan, Zhaojiang Lin, Jun Saito, Wenping Wang, and Taku Komura. Faceformer: Speech-driven 3d facial anima- tion with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18770–18780, 2022. 2

    2022

  5. [13]

    Affective faces for goal-driven dyadic communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10939, 2023

    Scott Geng, Revant Teotia, Purva Tendulkar, Sachit Menon, and Carl V ondrick. Affective faces for goal-driven dyadic communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10939, 2023. 5

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Resyncer: Rewiring style-based generator for unified audio-visually synced fa- cial performer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03284, 2024

    Jiazhi Guan, Zhiliang Xu, Hang Zhou, Kaisiyuan Wang, Shengyi He, Zhanwang Zhang, Borong Liang, Haocheng Feng, Errui Ding, Jingtuo Liu, et al. Resyncer: Rewiring style-based generator for unified audio-visually synced fa- cial performer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03284, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ac- tion2motion: Conditioned generation of 3d human motions

    Chuan Guo, Xinxin Zuo, Sen Wang, Shihao Zou, Qingyao Sun, Annan Deng, Minglun Gong, and Li Cheng. Ac- tion2motion: Conditioned generation of 3d human motions. InProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 2021–2029, 2020. 2

    2021

  8. [16]

    Generating diverse and natural 3d human motions from text

    Chuan Guo, Shihao Zou, Xinxin Zuo, Sen Wang, Wei Ji, Xingyu Li, and Li Cheng. Generating diverse and natural 3d human motions from text. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5152–5161, 2022. 2

    2022

  9. [17]

    Micro-expression spotting with multi-scale local transformer in long videos.Pattern Recognition Letters, 168:146–152,

    Xupeng Guo, Xiaobiao Zhang, Lei Li, and Zhaoqiang Xia. Micro-expression spotting with multi-scale local transformer in long videos.Pattern Recognition Letters, 168:146–152,

  10. [18]

    Toeplitz inverse covariance-based clustering of multivariate time series data

    David Hallac, Sagar Vare, Stephen Boyd, and Jure Leskovec. Toeplitz inverse covariance-based clustering of multivariate time series data. InProceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 215–223, 2017. 2, 4, 5

    2017

  11. [19]

    Gaia: Zero-shot talking avatar generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15230, 2023

    Tianyu He, Junliang Guo, Runyi Yu, Yuchi Wang, Jialiang Zhu, Kaikai An, Leyi Li, Xu Tan, Chunyu Wang, Han Hu, et al. Gaia: Zero-shot talking avatar generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15230, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. InNeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications, 2021. 5

    2021

  13. [21]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. InAdvances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, pages 6840–6851. Curran Asso- ciates, Inc., 2020. 4

    2020

  14. [22]

    Multi-aspect mining of complex sensor sequences

    Takato Honda, Yasuko Matsubara, Ryo Neyama, Mutsumi Abe, and Yasushi Sakurai. Multi-aspect mining of complex sensor sequences. In2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pages 299–308. IEEE, 2019. 4, 5

    2019

  15. [23]

    Loopy: Taming audio-driven portrait avatar with long-term motion dependency.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02634, 2024

    Jianwen Jiang, Chao Liang, Jiaqi Yang, Gaojie Lin, Tianyun Zhong, and Yanbo Zheng. Loopy: Taming audio-driven portrait avatar with long-term motion dependency.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02634, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Audio-driven facial animation by joint end- to-end learning of pose and emotion.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4):1–12, 2017

    Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, Antti Herva, and Jaakko Lehtinen. Audio-driven facial animation by joint end- to-end learning of pose and emotion.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4):1–12, 2017. 2

    2017

  17. [25]

    Kmtalk: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with key motion embedding

    Haojie Li and Shuangping Huang. Kmtalk: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with key motion embedding. 2024. 2

    2024

  18. [26]

    Talkinggaussian: Structure-persistent 3d talking head synthesis via gaussian splatting

    Jiahe Li, Jiawei Zhang, Xiao Bai, Jin Zheng, Xin Ning, Jun Zhou, and Lin Gu. Talkinggaussian: Structure-persistent 3d talking head synthesis via gaussian splatting. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 127–145. Springer,

  19. [27]

    Posetalk: Text-and-audio-based pose control and motion re- finement for one-shot talking head generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02657, 2024

    Jun Ling, Yiwen Wang, Han Xue, Rong Xie, and Li Song. Posetalk: Text-and-audio-based pose control and motion re- finement for one-shot talking head generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02657, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Talkclip: Talking head generation with text-guided expres- sive speaking styles.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.00334, 2023

    Yifeng Ma, Suzhen Wang, Yu Ding, Bowen Ma, Tangjie Lv, Changjie Fan, Zhipeng Hu, Zhidong Deng, and Xin Yu. Talkclip: Talking head generation with text-guided expres- sive speaking styles.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.00334, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Amass: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes

    Naureen Mahmood, Nima Ghorbani, Nikolaus F Troje, Ger- ard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. Amass: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 5442–5451, 2019. 2

    2019

  22. [30]

    Autoplait: Automatic mining of co-evolving time se- quences

    Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi Sakurai, and Christos Falout- sos. Autoplait: Automatic mining of co-evolving time se- quences. InProceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD inter- national conference on Management of data, pages 193–204,

    2014

  23. [31]

    From audio to photoreal embodiment: Synthesizing humans in conversations

    Evonne Ng, Javier Romero, Timur Bagautdinov, Shaojie Bai, Trevor Darrell, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Alexander Richard. From audio to photoreal embodiment: Synthesizing humans in conversations. InIEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024. 2

    2024

  24. [32]

    Scantalk: 3d talking heads from unregistered scans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10942, 2024

    Federico Nocentini, Thomas Besnier, Claudio Ferrari, Syl- vain Arguillere, Stefano Berretti, and Mohamed Daoudi. Scantalk: 3d talking heads from unregistered scans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10942, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Generating facial expressions for speech.Cognitive science, 20(1):1–46, 1996

    Catherine Pelachaud, Norman I Badler, and Mark Steedman. Generating facial expressions for speech.Cognitive science, 20(1):1–46, 1996. 2

    1996

  26. [34]

    Emotalk: Speech-driven emotional disentanglement for 3d face anima- tion

    Ziqiao Peng, Haoyu Wu, Zhenbo Song, Hao Xu, Xiangyu Zhu, Jun He, Hongyan Liu, and Zhaoxin Fan. Emotalk: Speech-driven emotional disentanglement for 3d face anima- tion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 20687–20697, 2023. 2

    2023

  27. [35]

    Multi-track timeline control for text-driven 3d human motion generation

    Mathis Petrovich, Or Litany, Umar Iqbal, Michael J Black, Gul Varol, Xue Bin Peng, and Davis Rempe. Multi-track timeline control for text-driven 3d human motion generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1911–1921, 2024. 3

    1911

  28. [36]

    The kit motion-language dataset.Big data, 4(4):236–252,

    Matthias Plappert, Christian Mandery, and Tamim Asfour. The kit motion-language dataset.Big data, 4(4):236–252,

  29. [37]

    A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild

    KR Prajwal, Rudrabha Mukhopadhyay, Vinay P Nambood- iri, and CV Jawahar. A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild. InProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 484–492, 2020. 2

    2020

  30. [38]

    Cas(me) 2 : A database for sponta- neous macro-expression and micro-expression spotting and recognition.IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 9 (4):424–436, 2018

    Fangbing Qu, Su-Jing Wang, Wen-Jing Yan, He Li, Shuhang Wu, and Xiaolan Fu. Cas(me) 2 : A database for sponta- neous macro-expression and micro-expression spotting and recognition.IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 9 (4):424–436, 2018. 2

    2018

  31. [39]

    Human motion diffusion as a generative prior

    Yonatan Shafir, Guy Tevet, Roy Kapon, and Amit H Bermano. Human motion diffusion as a generative prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01418, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Ab- hishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020. 4

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Diffposetalk: Speech-driven stylistic 3d facial animation and head pose generation via diffusion models.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–9, 2024

    Zhiyao Sun, Tian Lv, Sheng Ye, Matthieu Lin, Jenny Sheng, Yu-Hui Wen, Minjing Yu, and Yong-jin Liu. Diffposetalk: Speech-driven stylistic 3d facial animation and head pose generation via diffusion models.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–9, 2024. 2

    2024

  34. [42]

    Edtalk: Effi- cient disentanglement for emotional talking head synthesis

    Shuai Tan, Bin Ji, Mengxiao Bi, and Ye Pan. Edtalk: Effi- cient disentanglement for emotional talking head synthesis. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 398–

  35. [43]

    Emo: Emote portrait alive-generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions

    Linrui Tian, Qi Wang, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo. Emo: Emote portrait alive-generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17485, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Agentavatar: Disentangling planning, driving and ren- dering for photorealistic avatar agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17465, 2023

    Duomin Wang, Bin Dai, Yu Deng, and Baoyuan Wang. Agentavatar: Disentangling planning, driving and ren- dering for photorealistic avatar agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17465, 2023. 1, 2, 7, 8

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Mead: A large-scale audio-visual dataset for emotional talking-face generation

    Kaisiyuan Wang, Qianyi Wu, Linsen Song, Zhuoqian Yang, Wayne Wu, Chen Qian, Ran He, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. Mead: A large-scale audio-visual dataset for emotional talking-face generation. InECCV, pages 700–717. Springer,

  38. [46]

    Faceverse: a fine-grained and detail- controllable 3d face morphable model from a hybrid dataset

    Lizhen Wang, Zhiyuan Chen, Tao Yu, Chenguang Ma, Liang Li, and Yebin Liu. Faceverse: a fine-grained and detail- controllable 3d face morphable model from a hybrid dataset. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 20333–20342,...

    2022

  39. [47]

    Styletalk++: A unified framework for controlling the speaking styles of talking heads.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

    Suzhen Wang, Yifeng Ma, Yu Ding, Zhipeng Hu, Changjie Fan, Tangjie Lv, Zhidong Deng, and Xin Yu. Styletalk++: A unified framework for controlling the speaking styles of talking heads.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024. 2

    2024

  40. [48]

    Mes- net: A convolutional neural network for spotting multi-scale micro-expression intervals in long videos.IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, 30:3956–3969, 2021

    Su-Jing Wang, Ying He, Jingting Li, and Xiaolan Fu. Mes- net: A convolutional neural network for spotting multi-scale micro-expression intervals in long videos.IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, 30:3956–3969, 2021. 2

    2021

  41. [49]

    Instructavatar: Text- guided emotion and motion control for avatar generation

    Yuchi Wang, Junliang Guo, Jianhong Bai, Runyi Yu, Tianyu He, Xu Tan, Xu Sun, and Jiang Bian. Instructavatar: Text- guided emotion and motion control for avatar generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15758, 2024. 1, 2, 8

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Aniportrait: Audio-driven synthesis of photorealistic portrait animation

    Huawei Wei, Zejun Yang, and Zhisheng Wang. Aniportrait: Audio-driven synthesis of photorealistic portrait animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17694, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Mmhead: Towards fine- grained multi-modal 3d facial animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07757, 2024

    Sijing Wu, Yunhao Li, Yichao Yan, Huiyu Duan, Zi- wei Liu, and Guangtao Zhai. Mmhead: Towards fine- grained multi-modal 3d facial animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07757, 2024. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Codetalker: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with discrete motion prior

    Jinbo Xing, Menghan Xia, Yuechen Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Jue Wang, and Tien-Tsin Wong. Codetalker: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with discrete motion prior. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12780–12790, 2023. 2

    2023

  45. [53]

    Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven vi- sual synthesis for portrait image animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08801, 2024

    Mingwang Xu, Hui Li, Qingkun Su, Hanlin Shang, Li- wei Zhang, Ce Liu, Jingdong Wang, Luc Van Gool, Yao Yao, and Siyu Zhu. Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven vi- sual synthesis for portrait image animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08801, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Vasa-1: Lifelike audio-driven talking faces generated in real time.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10667,

    Sicheng Xu, Guojun Chen, Yu-Xiao Guo, Jiaolong Yang, Chong Li, Zhenyu Zang, Yizhong Zhang, Xin Tong, and Baining Guo. Vasa-1: Lifelike audio-driven talking faces generated in real time.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10667,

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Probabilistic speech- driven 3d facial motion synthesis: New benchmarks meth- ods and applications

    Karren D Yang, Anurag Ranjan, Jen-Hao Rick Chang, Raviteja Vemulapalli, and Oncel Tuzel. Probabilistic speech- driven 3d facial motion synthesis: New benchmarks meth- ods and applications. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p...

    2024

  48. [56]

    Samm long videos: A spontaneous facial micro-and macro- expressions dataset

    Chuin Hong Yap, Connah Kendrick, and Moi Hoon Yap. Samm long videos: A spontaneous facial micro-and macro- expressions dataset. In2020 15th IEEE International Con- ference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2020), pages 771–776. IEEE, 2020. 2

    2020

  49. [57]

    3d-cnn for facial micro-and macro-expression spotting on long video sequences using temporal oriented reference frame

    Chuin Hong Yap, Moi Hoon Yap, Adrian Davison, Connah Kendrick, Jingting Li, Su-Jing Wang, and Ryan Cunning- ham. 3d-cnn for facial micro-and macro-expression spotting on long video sequences using temporal oriented reference frame. InProceedings of the 30th ACM International C...

    2022

  50. [58]

    Geneface: Generalized and high- fidelity audio-driven 3d talking face synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13430, 2023

    Zhenhui Ye, Ziyue Jiang, Yi Ren, Jinglin Liu, JinZheng He, and Zhou Zhao. Geneface: Generalized and high- fidelity audio-driven 3d talking face synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13430, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Facial expression spotting based on optical flow features

    Jun Yu, Zhongpeng Cai, Zepeng Liu, Guochen Xie, and Peng He. Facial expression spotting based on optical flow features. InProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 7205–7209, 2022. 2

    2022

  52. [60]

    CelebV-Text: A large-scale facial text-video dataset

    Jianhui Yu, Hao Zhu, Liming Jiang, Chen Change Loy, Wei- dong Cai, and Wayne Wu. CelebV-Text: A large-scale facial text-video dataset. InCVPR, 2023. 2

    2023

  53. [61]

    Talking head generation with probabilistic audio-to-visual diffusion priors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04248, 2022

    Zhentao Yu, Zixin Yin, Deyu Zhou, Duomin Wang, Finn Wong, and Baoyuan Wang. Talking head generation with probabilistic audio-to-visual diffusion priors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04248, 2022. 7

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Talking head generation with probabilistic audio-to-visual diffusion priors

    Zhentao Yu, Zixin Yin, Deyu Zhou, Duomin Wang, Finn Wong, and Baoyuan Wang. Talking head generation with probabilistic audio-to-visual diffusion priors. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 7645–7655, 2023. 7

    2023

  55. [63]

    Personatalk: Bring attention to your persona in visual dubbing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05379, 2024

    Longhao Zhang, Shuang Liang, Zhipeng Ge, and Tianshu Hu. Personatalk: Bring attention to your persona in visual dubbing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05379, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Sadtalker: Learning realistic 3d motion coefficients for stylized audio- driven single image talking face animation

    Wenxuan Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Xuan Wang, Yong Zhang, Xi Shen, Yu Guo, Ying Shan, and Fei Wang. Sadtalker: Learning realistic 3d motion coefficients for stylized audio- driven single image talking face animation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pa...

    2023

  57. [65]

    Media2face: Co-speech facial animation gen- eration with multi-modality guidance

    Qingcheng Zhao, Pengyu Long, Qixuan Zhang, Dafei Qin, Han Liang, Longwen Zhang, Yingliang Zhang, Jingyi Yu, and Lan Xu. Media2face: Co-speech facial animation gen- eration with multi-modality guidance. InACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–13, 2024. 2

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.