Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 32 references

In-situ nanoscale transport measurements on monoatomic metal films by low-temperature scanning tunneling potentiometry

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper develops a low-temperature scanning tunneling potentiometry system and demonstrates that subtracting images taken under opposite lateral voltages yields nanoscale electrochemical potential maps on atomically thin metal films…

desk verdict A solid LT-STP system paper with a clean VDOS derivation and a credible in-situ Pb/Si(111) SIC demonstration; the reverse-bias subtraction assumption is standard but under-tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21059 v1 pith:J22DMHWW submitted 2025-05-27 cond-mat.mes-hall

Masayuki Hamada , Masahiro Haze , Junya Okazaki , Yukio Hasegawa This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords scanningtunnelingpotentiometrylow-temperatureSTMin-situsamplepreparationelectrochemicalpotentialmappingnonlineardensity-of-statesartifactPb/Si(111)stripedincommensuratephasenanoscaletransportsurfaceconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the development of a low-temperature scanning tunneling potentiometry (STP) system and shows that it can map the electrochemical potential on monoatomic metal films with nanometer spatial resolution. The key demonstration is on a Pb monolayer on Si(111) prepared in situ, where the potential images are contaminated by two artifacts: a thermovoltage from tip-sample temperature differences and a voltage shift from the nonlinear density of states. The authors extract the true electrochemical potential by subtracting images taken under opposite lateral voltages, and they derive a formula for the nonlinear-DOS artifact, confirming it quantitatively with dI/dV spectroscopy. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a way to probe how atomic-scale defects, steps, and domain boundaries control electrical transport at low temperatures, where quantum effects become visible.

What carries the argument

The central object is the STP feedback loop combined with the reverse-bias subtraction formula, $\mu_{\mathrm{ecp}}(V_{\mathrm{lat}}) = \frac{1}{2}\{V_{\mathrm{STP}}(V_{\mathrm{lat}}) - V_{\mathrm{STP}}(-V_{\mathrm{lat}})\}$. The STP loop applies an ac modulation to the tunneling bias and adjusts an offset so the time-averaged tunneling current is zero; the offset, called the STP signal, includes the electrochemical potential plus a thermovoltage $V_{\mathrm{th}}$ and a nonlinear-DOS shift $V_{\mathrm{DOS}}$. The subtraction removes both artifacts because $V_{\mathrm{DOS}}$ is taken to be independent of $V_{\mathrm{lat}}$ and $V_{\mathrm{th}}$ is taken to depend only on $|V_{\mathrm{lat}}|$. The derived formula $V_{\mathrm{DOS}} = -(V_{\mathrm{ac}}^2/4)(d^2I/dV^2)/(dI/dV)$ allows the artifact to be predicted from dI/dV spectra, turning it from a nuisance into a quantitative check.

What would settle it

Measure a homogeneous film with no internal potential steps and repeat the opposite-polarity subtraction at two different modulation amplitudes Vac. If the VDOS formula is correct, the difference between two regions with different dI/dV must scale with Vac-squared; if the residual changes with Vac in a different way, or if the subtracted image changes when Vac is changed, the nonlinear-DOS model is incomplete. A second check is to vary the lateral voltage magnitude while keeping polarity symmetric: if Joule heating is the only thermal effect, Vth should be identical at +Vlat and -Vlat, and the extracted potential slope should match the independently measured sheet resistance and current density.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that stable low-temperature operation combined with in-situ preparation makes it possible to obtain genuine nanoscale electrochemical potential images of atomically clean metal monolayers. The procedure is to take two STP images on the same area with lateral voltages $+V_{\mathrm{lat}}$ and $-V_{\mathrm{lat}}$; the true electrochemical potential is half their difference, because the thermovoltage depends only on $|V_{\mathrm{lat}}|$ and the nonlinear-DOS artifact is independent of $V_{\mathrm{lat}}$. The paper also claims that the artifact $V_{\mathrm{DOS}}$ is given by $V_{\mathrm{DOS}} = -(V_{\mathrm{ac}}^2/4)(d^2I/dV^2)/(dI/dV)$ at $V=0$, and it demonstrates consistency with numerically differentiated dI/dV spectra: on an island the measured $V_{\mathrm{DOS}}$ difference of about 1700 microvolts matches the expected value of about 1200 microvolts from spectroscopy. On the Pb/Si(111) SIC film the extracted potential gradient of 1.2 microvolts per nanometer agrees with the global applied field of 1.5 microvolts per nanometer, with the difference attributed to contact resistance. The method also resolves abrupt potential drops at individual grain boundaries in a polycrystalline Au film, showing that specific grain boundaries carry resistance while others do not.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two artifacts subtracted away behave identically for opposite current directions: the density-of-states shift must not depend on the lateral voltage, and the thermovoltage must depend only on the magnitude of the lateral voltage, not on which way current flows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nanoscale resistance maps of in-situ prepared metal monolayers can be obtained at low temperature, allowing defects, steps, and domain boundaries to be identified as conducting or blocking.
  • The quantitative VDOS formula means ac-STP images can be corrected using dI/dV data alone, so opposite-polarity scans are not always required.
  • The Pb/Si(111) SIC result shows terrace resistance dominates over step resistance, giving a concrete counterexample to the behavior seen on some other metallic surface reconstructions.
  • The 7 K base temperature opens the way to STP measurements across phase transitions such as the superconducting transition of the Pb monolayer.
  • Combining the potential map with STM topography and dI/dV on the same area lets transport features be correlated with atomic structure in one measurement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to apply the same subtraction protocol under an external magnetic field, mapping local Hall or magnetoresistance variations at the nanoscale.
  • The Vac-squared scaling of VDOS could serve as a self-calibration test for any STP setup, even on samples without a known dI/dV feature.
  • If Peltier or Thomson contributions depend on current direction at higher currents, the subtraction would leave a residual; testing at several Vlat magnitudes would reveal the practical current limit of the method.
  • The agreement between the extracted potential slope and the global applied field suggests contact resistance can be estimated locally, which could be used to characterize electrode interfaces in future devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the development of a low-temperature scanning tunneling potentiometry (LT-STP) system combined with in-situ sample preparation, and demonstrates it on polycrystalline Au films and on monolayer Pb/Si(111) in the striped incommensurate (SIC) phase. The authors derive an expression for the artifact VDOS caused by the nonlinear density of states, and propose to extract the electrochemical potential by subtracting STP images taken under opposite lateral voltages, following the approach of Ref. [18]. On Pb/Si(111), they show that island and domain-boundary contrasts disappear after subtraction and that the terrace potential slope agrees with the global resistance. They also compare the VDOS predicted from dI/dV spectra with the directly measured STP signal on an island.

Significance. If the evenness assumptions in the subtraction procedure hold, the system provides a practical route to nanoscale transport measurements on air-sensitive monolayer films at cryogenic temperatures, which is a useful experimental advance. The derivation of VDOS is clean, and the comparison with dI/dV spectroscopy is a reasonable consistency check. The in-situ preparation, stable low-temperature operation, and potential resolution of about 20 µV are notable strengths, and the Pb/Si(111) result that terrace resistance dominates over step resistance is a concrete physical observation. However, the central extraction relies on an untested symmetry assumption about VDOS and Vth, and the quantitative VDOS validation has about a 30% discrepancy, so the confidence in the quantitative claims is limited.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (8)-(9)] The extraction μecp = ½[VSTP(+Vlat) − VSTP(−Vlat)] requires that VDOS is independent of Vlat and that Vth depends only on |Vlat|. The text justifies this by Joule heating ∝ I², but this does not exclude odd-in-current effects such as Peltier heating at the tip–sample or electrode contacts or Thomson effects in the presence of a Joule-induced temperature gradient; it also does not address a possible Stark shift of the local DOS in the lateral field. Since the measured VDOS contrasts on Pb islands (~1.7 mV) are comparable to the local potential gradients, an odd artifact of even a fraction of this size would bias the extracted μecp maps at a level comparable to the stated ~20 µV resolution. The empirical disappearance of island and domain-boundary contrasts shows that even artifacts dominate, but it does not bound odd components. Please provide a direct test, for instance by measuring VSTP as a function of |Vlat| and checking whether the antisymmetric part is independent of magnitude, or by comparing the ac-mode results with a dc-mode STP measurement, and/or by estimating the expected Peltier and Thomson voltages.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (7) and Fig. 7] The quantitative confirmation of VDOS relies on numerical derivatives of dI/dV spectra without reported error bars, and the predicted island–terrace difference of ~1200 µV for Vac = 25 mV differs from the measured ~1700 µV by about 30%. The text calls this consistent, but it should quantify the uncertainty from numerical differentiation and from the neglected d³I/dV³ term in Eq. (6). This matters because the claim that the nonlinear-DOS artifact is 'confirmed' is load-bearing for the method's validity. Please report error propagation for d²I/dV² and dI/dV, and justify that the second-order Taylor expansion is adequate at Vac = 25 mV.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 4(e)] The spatial resolution of the potential measurement is estimated from the logistic smearing factor k = 0.4 nm, but the statement that the resolution is in the nanometer range is not fully supported. The value of k is affected by the STM tip shape and by the specific step geometry, and the authors themselves note that tip-related artifacts must be considered. I recommend either providing a more direct resolution test, such as a potential step with a known sharpness, or tempering the resolution claim to avoid overinterpretation of the logistic fit.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (8)] There are two equations labeled (8): the Vth formula and the subsequent expression for VSTP. Please renumber them to avoid confusion.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2)] Equation (1) is missing; the first displayed equation is Eq. (2). Please add the missing equation or renumber the equations.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eq. (9)] The subtraction method of Eq. (9) is attributed to Ref. [18] only indirectly through the introduction; please cite Ref. [18] explicitly at Eq. (9).
  4. [Sec. 3, Fig. 4 caption] The caption states 'The applied lateral voltage and current density flowing between the Au electrodes are Vlat = ±2.3 V and Jlat = 7.4 mA/mm'; the units for Jlat should be defined clearly (e.g., mA/mm as linear current density) and the sentence should read grammatically.
  5. [Sec. 4.2, Fig. 7] The dI/dV and d²I/dV² spectra in Fig. 7(d)-(e) are shown without error bars or measurement parameters; please specify the lock-in modulation, integration time, and the number of averaged spectra.
  6. [Introduction, Sec. 1] The term 'alternative current' should be 'alternating current' (AC), and 'dc (direct current) operation' is standard but should be consistent throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reverse-bias subtraction follows external STP practice, the VDOS model is derived rather than fitted, and the dI/dV comparison is an independent observable check.

full rationale

The central extraction, Eq. (9), is not derived from the paper's own assumptions alone; it is the standard reverse-bias cancellation procedure cited to the external work of Marković et al. [18], not to the authors' prior results. The VDOS formula, Eq. (7), is obtained by an explicit Taylor expansion of the time-averaged tunneling current under the stated assumption that the third derivative is negligible; it is a model, not a restatement of the measured STP signal. The experimental confirmation compares this model prediction with d2I/dV2 values obtained from independently measured dI/dV spectra on the terrace and island, and the residual 30% discrepancy is a quantitative accuracy issue, not a circular one. Similarly, the observation that island and domain-boundary contrasts disappear after subtraction is a consistency consequence of Eq. (9)'s evenness assumption, but the assumption itself is borrowed from established STP methodology and is not justified by a self-citation chain. The paper's self-references ([4], [19], [21,22]) provide circuit details and background comparisons; none carries a load-bearing uniqueness claim or smuggles in the target result via ansatz. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no known result is merely renamed. The evenness of Vth and VDOS in Vlat is an assumption that may warrant experimental scrutiny, but it is an assumption, not a circular derivation, and the manuscript's own data provide an independent, if imperfect, check on the dominant artifact term.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The instrument paper does not introduce new physical entities; it relies on standard tunneling theory plus a set of domain assumptions about the symmetry of artifacts under current reversal. The few fitted parameters are descriptive of individual measurements, not free parameters tuned to force the central claim. The main modeling assumptions are the negligible third-order derivative and the polarity-independence of VDOS and Vth, both of which are physically plausible but not directly verified by experiment.

free parameters (2)
  • Logistic fit parameters for Au grain boundary step = A = 56 uV, B = 227 uV, x0 = 154.6 nm, k = 0.4 nm
    Fitted to a single potential step profile (Fig. 4e, Eq. 10) to estimate potential jump and spatial resolution. These values characterize one measurement and are not used to derive the central method.
  • Contact resistance of Ta electrodes to Pb film = 174 Ω
    Inferred from the difference between the measured potential slope (1.2 uV/nm) and the expected global slope (1.5 uV/nm) on Pb/Si(111). Used to explain the small deviation, not independently measured.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Third-order derivative of tunneling current with respect to voltage is negligibly small at zero bias.
    Required to drop the d3I/dV3 term in Eq. (6) and obtain the closed form for VDOS in Eq. (7).
  • domain assumption VDOS is independent of lateral voltage polarity and Vth depends only on the magnitude of Vlat.
    This is the basis of the subtraction formula in Eq. (9); if thermoelectric effects break the symmetry under current reversal, the extracted electrochemical potential would be biased.
  • domain assumption Substrate conductance is negligible, so current flows only through the Pb overlayer.
    Used in Section 4.1, justified by the high resistivity of non-doped Si and the measured >1 GOhm resistance without Pb versus ~1 kOhm with Pb.
  • standard math The time-averaged tunneling current can be computed by second-order Taylor expansion and the sin and cos terms vanish upon integration.
    Standard analytic treatment used in Eqs. (3)-(5) for the ac-STP feedback loop.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In-situ nanoscale transport measurements on monoatomic metal films by low-temperature scanning tunneling potentiometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J22DMHWW

@misc{pith2026250521059,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In-situ nanoscale transport measurements on monoatomic metal films by low-temperature scanning tunneling potentiometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J22DMHWW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21059}
}
read the original abstract

Investigation of transport properties is fundamental for characterizing electronic properties and phase transitions. However, most of the transport measurements on conductive layers have been performed at macroscopic scales, and thus the development of microscopic methods to measure transport is important. Scanning tunneling potentiometry (STP) is a powerful tool for investigating surface conductivity at nano-scale spatial resolutions. However, it is still challenging to conduct STP studies at low temperatures and most of the low-temperature studies were performed on samples that were prepared ex-situ. In this study, we developed a low-temperature STP and demonstrated its performance on monoatomic metal films formed on Si(111) substrates that were prepared in-situ. Stable operation at low temperatures enables us to extract the electrochemical potential originating from the surface transport by canceling out the potential due to thermal differences and artifacts arising from the nonlinearity of the density of states (DOS). We also formulated the nonlinear-DOS artifact and confirmed it by comparing with the nonlinearity obtained by scanning tunneling spectroscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21059 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) Topographic STM image taken on a Au thin film on the SiO2-coated Si substrate. (b,c) electrochemical potential (STP) images taken on the same area during the lateral current flowing from left to right (from right to left), respectively. The images were taken at T = 19 K. The applied lateral voltage and current density flowing between the Au electrodes are Vlat = ±2.3 V and Jlat = 7.4 mA/mm, respectively. The amp… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Willke, T

    P. Willke, T. Kotzott, T. Pruschke, and M. Wenderoth, Magnetotransport on the nano scale, Nat Commun 8, 15283 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    Introduction Two-dimensional (2D) transport, which includes surface transport, is unique compared to three- dimensional one [1–3]. Point defects, such as atomic defects and vacancies, and one-dimensional defects, such as steps and domain boundaries, have significant influences on the 2D transport properties [4,5]. However, the role of such local disorders...

    work page

  3. [2]

    The system is cooled by liquid helium and the base temperature, which is measured by the Cernox sensor located close to the sample holder, is 7 K

    Methods We developed an LT -STP setup by incorporating an STP circuit into a commercial low - temperature UHV-STM (Unisoku USM-1300S) and a commercial STM feedback system (RHK R9 controller). The system is cooled by liquid helium and the base temperature, which is measured by the Cernox sensor located close to the sample holder, is 7 K. Our STP circuit is...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Prior to the deposition of the Au film, two rectangular Au electrodes were formed using a mask

    Polycrystalline Au films formed on SiO2 substrate 3-1 Sample To demonstrate the performance of our STP system, we performed LT-STP measurements on a polycrystalline Au thin film deposited by an ion coater on a SiO 2-coated (thickness: 200 nm) Si substrate. Prior to the deposition of the Au film, two rectangular Au electrodes were formed using a mask. Figu...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Pb monolayer formed on Si(111) substrate 4-1. Sample To perform LT-STP measurements on surface reconstructed structures, we fabricated one of the metallic phases of Pb monolayers on Si(111) substrate: the striped incommensurate (SIC) phase with a coverage of ~4/3 monolayers. It has been known that this phase is metallic at our measurement temperature (7 -...

    work page

  6. [5]

    We first demonstrated the performance of LT-STP on a polycrystalline Au thin film formed on a SiO2 substrate

    Conclusion In conclusion, we have developed an LT-STP system that works on metal monolayers formed on semiconducting substrates that were prepared in-situ. We first demonstrated the performance of LT-STP on a polycrystalline Au thin film formed on a SiO2 substrate. We then performed LT-STP measurements on Si(111)-SIC Pb, which has atomically thin flat wit...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Hasegawa, Charge and spin transport on surfaces and atomic layers measured by multi - probe techniques, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 223001 (2019)

    S. Hasegawa, Charge and spin transport on surfaces and atomic layers measured by multi - probe techniques, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 223001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [7]

    Baringhaus et al., Exceptional ballistic transport in epitaxial graphene nanoribbons, Nature 506, 349 (2014)

    J. Baringhaus et al., Exceptional ballistic transport in epitaxial graphene nanoribbons, Nature 506, 349 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    S. H. Ji, J. B. Hannon, R. M. Tromp, V . Perebeinos, J. Tersoff, and F. M. Ross, Atomic-scale transport in epitaxial graphene, Nat Mater 11, 114 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Hamada and Y

    M. Hamada and Y . Hasegawa, Role of one -dimensional defects in the electrical transport through Si(111)−7×7 surface states, Phys Rev B 99, 125402 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Lüpke et al., Electrical resistance of individual defects at a topological insulator surface, Nat Commun 8, 15704 (2017)

    F. Lüpke et al., Electrical resistance of individual defects at a topological insulator surface, Nat Commun 8, 15704 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Muralt and D

    P. Muralt and D. W. Pohl, Scanning tunneling potentiometry, Appl Phys Lett 48, 514 (1986)

    1986

  5. [12]

    Nakamura, R

    T. Nakamura, R. Yoshino, R. Hobara, S. Hasegawa, and T. Hirahara, Development of a convenient in situ UHV scanning tunneling potentiometry system using a tip holder equipped with current-injection wires, E-Journal of Surface Science and Nanotechnology 14, 216 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Bannani, C

    A. Bannani, C. A. Bobisch, and R. Möller, Local potentiometry using a multiprobe scanning 10 tunneling microscope, Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 083704 (2008)

    2008

  7. [14]

    Homoth et al., Electronic transport on the nanoscale: Ballistic transmission and Ohm’s law, Nano Lett 9, 1588 (2009)

    J. Homoth et al., Electronic transport on the nanoscale: Ballistic transmission and Ohm’s law, Nano Lett 9, 1588 (2009)

    2009

  8. [15]

    Sinterhauf, G

    A. Sinterhauf, G. A. Traeger, D. Momeni, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, and M. Wenderoth, Unraveling the origin of local variations in the step resistance of epitaxial graphene on SiC: a quantitative scanning tunneling potentiometry study, Carbon N Y 184, 463 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    Sinterhauf et al., Substrate induced nanoscale resistance variation in epitaxial graphene, Nat Commun 11, 555 (2020)

    A. Sinterhauf et al., Substrate induced nanoscale resistance variation in epitaxial graphene, Nat Commun 11, 555 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Willke, T

    P. Willke, T. Druga, R. G. Ulbrich, M. A. Schneider, and M. Wenderoth, Spatial extent of a Landauer residual -resistivity dipole in graphene quantified by scanning tunnelling potentiometry, Nat Commun 6, 6399 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    W. Wang, K. Munakata, M. Rozler, and M. R. Beasley, Local Transport Measurements at Mesoscopic Length Scales Using Scanning Tunneling Potentiometry, Phys Rev Lett 110, 236802 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    W. Ko, S. Hus, H. Kim, J. S. Kim, X.-G. Zhang, and A.-P . Li, Resistivity of Surface Steps in Bulk-Insulating Topological Insulators, Front Mater 9, 887484 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Bauer, A

    S. Bauer, A. M. Bernhart, and C. A. Bobisch, Electron transport in Bi 2 Se 3 ultra thin films, Appl Surf Sci 432, 140 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Bauer and C

    S. Bauer and C. A. Bobisch, Nanoscale electron transport at the surface of a topological insulator, Nat Commun 7, 11381 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Marković, W

    T. Marković, W. Huang, P . Gambardella, and S. Stepanow, Performance analysis and implementation of a scanning tunneling potentiometry setup: Toward low -noise and high - sensitivity measurements of the electrochemical potential, Review of Scientific Instrume nts 92, 103707 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Hamada and Y

    M. Hamada and Y . Hasegawa, Development of Scanning Tunneling Potentiometry for Semiconducting Samples, Jpn J Appl Phys 51, 125202 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    T.-L. Chan, C. Z. Wang, M. Hupalo, M. C. Tringides, Z.-Y . Lu, and K. M. Ho, First-principles studies of structures and stabilities of Pb/Si(111), Phys Rev B 68, 045410 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Y . Sato, M. Haze, R. Nemoto, W. Qian, S. Yoshizawa, T. Uchihashi, and Y . Hasegawa, Squeezed Abrikosov -Josephson V ortex in Atomic-Layer Pb Superconductors Formed on Vicinal Si(111) Substrates, Phys Rev Lett 130, 106002 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Oguro, Y

    F. Oguro, Y . Sato, K. Asakawa, M. Haze, and Y . Hasegawa, Enhanced critical magnetic field for monoatomic-layer superconductor by Josephson junction steps, Phys Rev B 103, 085416 (2021). 11

    2021

  20. [28]

    Zhang et al., Superconductivity in one-atomic-layer metal films grown on Si(111), Nat Phys 6, 104 (2010)

    T. Zhang et al., Superconductivity in one-atomic-layer metal films grown on Si(111), Nat Phys 6, 104 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Friesen, H

    C. Friesen, H. Osterhage, J. Friedlein, A. Schlenhoff, R. Wiesendanger, and S. Krause, Magneto-Seebeck tunneling on the atomic scale, Science (1979) 363, 1065 (2019)

    1979

  22. [30]

    Hoffmann, J

    D. Hoffmann, J. Seifritz, B. Weyers, and R. Möller, Thermovoltage in scanning tunneling microscopy, J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 109, 117 (2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    J. P. Pelz and R. H. Koch, Extremely low -noise potentiometry with a scanning tunneling microscope, Review of Scientific Instruments 60, 301 (1989)

    1989

  24. [32]

    J. P. Pelz and R. H. Koch, Tip-Related Artifacts in Scanning Tunneling Potentiometry, 1990. 12 Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of our STP circuit. 13 Fig. 2. Artifacts due to nonlinearity in the density of states. When d2I/dV2 = 0, VDOS = 0 when 𝐼̃ is set to 0 by the STP feedback, a...

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.