Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 90 references

Atomistic and experimental study of microstructural evolution in nanocrystalline iron subjected to irradiation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The reported swelling resistance of nanocrystalline iron is a pre-existing state created by severe plastic deformation, not a property of small grains.

desk verdict Solid MD plus XRD study of nanocrystalline iron, but the central swelling-resistance claim is a prediction of the athermal MD model, not something the experiments validate. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21174 v1 pith:NCA2BJHG submitted 2025-05-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ivan Tolkachev , Daniel R. Mason , Max Boleininger , Pui-Wai Ma , Daniel Long , Eamonn T. Connolly , Stephen P. Thompson , Kenichiro Mizohata
show 1 more author
Felix Hofmann
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nanocrystallineironcollisioncascadesmoleculardynamicsirradiation-inducedgraingrowthswellingresistancesevereplasticdeformationWilliamson-Hallanalysisrandom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the swelling tolerance often attributed to nanocrystalline iron under irradiation is not an intrinsic grain-boundary effect. Using molecular-dynamics cascade simulations of Voronoi-tessellated, severe-plastic-deformation-sheared, and pristine single-crystal cells, it shows that nanocrystalline cells coarsen to a single crystal by about 2 dpa, and that their lower swelling disappears when compared against a perfect-crystal reference: by about 9 dpa all starting states converge to the same swelling. Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction on high-pressure-torsioned, self-ion-irradiated iron confirms irradiation-induced annealing through reduced microstrain and grain growth, with the MD-predicted linear growth rate matching experiment. A Toy Model that exchanges volume between grains under different growth hypotheses finds the data consistent with fully random growth. If correct, the result reframes nanocrystalline radiation tolerance as a processing-history effect rather than a nanostructure design principle for fusion materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the athermal collision-cascade molecular-dynamics protocol, which repeatedly deposits SRIM-derived recoil energies in 1,024,000-atom iron cells at about 0.0002 dpa increments up to 5 dpa (and in one run 10 dpa), at a dose rate near 1 dpa per microsecond with no thermal recovery. Three starting states are compared: Voronoi-tessellated grains at two sizes, cells produced by severe plastic shearing, and pristine single crystals. Damage is quantified with dislocation analysis, volumetric swelling from box dimensions, and Williamson-Hall analysis applied both to experimental GIXRD line profiles and to MD-generated diffractograms via the Debye scattering equation; the sheared-cell grain radius grows linearly as $r = 7.52\,\mathrm{dpa} + r_0$ (Eq. 3), which is then scaled to the experiment. To explain which grains grow, a Toy Model lets grains exchange volume under six hypotheses, including fully random, volume-weighted, size-biased, and elastic-energy-density-biased growth, and compares the disappearance order to the MD data using $\chi^2$ tests, accepting only the fully random mechanism (RAN).

What would settle it

Measure the absolute lattice parameter (against a perfect-crystal standard) of SPD-processed nanocrystalline iron, coarse-grained iron, and annealed nanocrystalline iron to doses above 10 dpa: the convergence claim predicts all three plateau at the same swelling, so observing a persistently lower plateau for the fine-grained sample, or a different plateau after annealing away the SPD swelling, would refute the pre-existing-swelling explanation. In addition, tracking individual grains in larger cells or in-situ experiments and finding that the smallest grains preferentially disappear would refute the Toy Model's random-growth result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the lower irradiation-induced swelling seen in nanocrystalline iron is a consequence of the starting material's prior severe plastic deformation, not of the nanocrystalline grain structure itself. In cascade simulations, all initially nanocrystalline cells—whether Voronoi or sheared—become single crystalline above roughly 2 dpa, and every cell type converges to the same volumetric swelling around 9–10 dpa when measured against a perfect-crystal reference. The initially nanocrystalline cells therefore do not resist swelling; they simply start already swollen, leaving less room for further increase. The paper further establishes that grain coarsening under irradiation is consistent with random growth in its Toy Model, and that the lower dislocation density in initially nanocrystalline cells persists even after they become single crystalline because grain boundaries prevented the formation of the large, energetically costly dislocation networks seen in pristine cells. Experimentally, Williamson-Hall analysis of X-ray line profiles from ion-irradiated high-pressure-torsioned iron shows grain growth and a dose-dependent reduction in microstrain, matching the sheared-cell simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the athermal MD cascade model, at roughly 1 dpa per microsecond with no thermally activated recovery, behaves like the 300 K experimental ion irradiation; Eq. (3) transfers the MD grain-growth rate to the experiment without revisiting that dose-rate and temperature mismatch.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above roughly 2 dpa, every initially nanocrystalline simulation cell in this study is single crystalline, so any grain-boundary sink benefit in nanocrystalline iron is limited to the early dose window.
  • The lower dislocation density of initially nanocrystalline iron at high dose comes from the absence of large dislocation networks, not from ongoing grain-boundary absorption; the constraint is set early, before the grains disappear.
  • When referenced to a perfect-crystal initial state, swelling converges for all starting microstructures by about 9–10 dpa, implying that 'swelling-resistant nanocrystalline' rankings depend on the reference state chosen.
  • Experimental HPT-processed iron shows irradiation-induced annealing, with microstrain falling and grain size growing, and the MD-derived linear grain-growth rate predicts the measured trend, tying the atomistic model to the 300 K self-ion experiment.
  • Grain growth in the simulations is consistent with random volume exchange, so initial grain size and elastic energy density do not predict which grains survive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pre-existing-swelling reading is right, efforts to engineer radiation-tolerant fusion steels by shrinking grain size should be weighed against processing-induced starting defect density; the same severe-plastic-deformation treatment that creates nanograins may already set the swelling budget.
  • The paper's Eq. (3) transfer implicitly assumes the athermal MD grain-growth rate survives at 300 K with thermal recovery; a natural test is to run cascades with elevated-temperature relaxation or to measure the grain-growth slope at different irradiation temperatures.
  • The Toy Model's acceptance of random growth predicts, testably, that grain-disappearance order in experiments should be independent of the initial grain-size distribution; in-situ TEM or electron-backscatter-diffraction maps tracking individual grains could falsify or support this.
  • One consequence the authors do not draw: if all microstructures converge to the same swelling at high dose, then comparative irradiation studies should report absolute lattice-parameter changes against a perfect-crystal standard, not per-sample zero-dose references.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper combines molecular dynamics (MD) collision-cascade simulations (up to 5 and 10 dpa) of nanocrystalline iron, created by Voronoi tessellation or severe plastic shear, with pristine single-crystal iron cells, and compares the simulated microstructural evolution to experimental grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction data from self-ion-irradiated high-pressure-torsioned iron. The authors report irradiation-induced grain coarsening, a reduction in microstrain for sheared cells and in the experiments, and lower dislocation density and swelling in initially nanocrystalline cells when referenced to their own starting state. A toy model of volume exchange between grains is used to argue that grain growth is consistent with a random-growth mechanism. The central interpretive claim is that the often-reported swelling resistance of nanocrystalline iron is not an intrinsic grain-boundary sink effect but rather a pre-existing SPD-induced swelling state that leaves less room for further irradiation-induced swelling.

Significance. The paper is significant because it challenges a common interpretation of radiation tolerance in nanocrystalline metals: if correct, the 'swelling resistance' observed in SPD-processed nanocrystalline iron is a pre-existing state effect, not an active sink effect. The MD protocol is thorough and repeatable across five independent cells per condition, the experimental XRD data are internally consistent, and the toy model tests specific growth hypotheses against the MD data using the same initial volume distributions. The main value is the comparison between atomistic simulations and experiments, although the validation hinges on transferring an athermal MD growth rate to room-temperature experiments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.2] The claim that 'all [nanocrystalline cells] ultimately become single crystalline above 2 dpa' is contradicted by the authors' own needle simulation in Appendix D, where a 100-grain, ~5-million-atom cell retains ~9 grains at 2.5 dpa. This shows that the single-crystal convergence is a finite-size artifact of the 1-million-atom periodic cells. Because the paper's conclusions about grain growth and the 'material forgets its initial configuration' behavior rely on this convergence, the claim must be explicitly conditioned on simulation cell size, or the discrepancy with Appendix D must be discussed. As written, the abstract and conclusions overgeneralize the MD result.
  2. [Section 2.2] The athermal cascade model is asserted to be 'appropriate for ... direct comparison to room temperature experiments' without quantitative support. The simulations run at ~1 dpa/µs and relax to 0 K between cascades, omitting all thermally activated diffusion and defect recovery. At 300 K in BCC Fe, self-interstitials are highly mobile and vacancies are mobile above stage III; over the seconds-to-hours between cascades in the actual experiment, these defects migrate, recombine, and annihilate, changing the defect population and swelling. Since no experimental swelling measurement is reported (the experimental validation is limited to microstrain and grain size), the MD swelling trajectory in Fig. 9 is not directly validated. The central reinterpretation of nanocrystalline swelling resistance depends on this extrapolation; the paper needs either experimental swelling data or a quantitative timescale argument showing that athermal evolution dominates at 300 K.
  3. [Section 4 and Figure 11(b)] The 'prediction' of experimental grain growth uses Eq. (3), where the slope 7.52 nm/dpa is fitted to MD sheared-cell data and the intercept r0 is set to the experimental initial grain size (132 nm). This is a semi-empirical transfer of a MD-derived slope, not a parameter-free prediction. Moreover, the experimental grain sizes are ~20-40 times larger than the MD grains, and no scaling argument is given for why the per-dpa growth rate should be size-independent. The agreement with two or three experimental points should be presented as a consistency test, not as validation of the MD physics, unless a size-scaling justification is provided.
  4. [Section 4, Toy Model and Table 1] The toy-model conclusion that grain growth is 'consistent with random growth' is based on a chi-square test where the RAN mechanism is accepted; however, for the sheared cells the RAN chi-square value (109.35) is within 4% of the critical value (113.15), and the test assumes a specific volume-exchange implementation and the elastic energy density approximation of Eq. (4). The near-threshold result and the sensitivity of the conclusion to these modeling choices should be acknowledged.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.2] The abstract states that nanocrystalline cells show 'lower lattice swelling' than pristine cells, but this is only true when referenced to each cell's own 0 dpa state (Fig. 9a). When referenced to the pristine cell at 0 dpa (Fig. 9b), all cells converge to similar swelling by 5 dpa. The reference state should be stated explicitly to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Section 4] The claimed experimental agreement of microstrain trends applies only to the sheared MD cells; the Voronoi cells show increasing microstrain with dose (Figs. 10a,b). The abstract and discussion should specify 'sheared cells' rather than implying agreement for all nanocrystalline simulations.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (3)] The symbol r0 is first defined as the mean starting radius of sheared cells at 0.03 dpa (3.9715 nm) and later set to 132 nm when scaling to experiments. Clarify that the experimental value is an intercept chosen to match the experimental initial grain size, not a prediction.
  4. [Section 3.3] The text refers to 'Figure 10(d)' when describing in-plane and out-of-plane lattice strain, but Figure 10 has only panels (a)-(c); this should be Figure 11(d). Similarly, in Section 4, 'Figure 12(c)' should be 'Figure 11(c)' for the experimental microstrain data.
  5. [Section 6] The Data Availability statement says 'A link will be provided after the review process and before publication,' which is a placeholder. Provide a repository link or accession code before publication.
  6. [Figure 10 caption] The caption for Figure 10(b) says 'c = 5.2 nm' but should read 'dc = 5.2 nm' for consistency with the rest of the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MD predictions are checked against independent experimental data, and the swelling reinterpretation follows from simulation outputs rather than definitional equations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any target result to its inputs. The MD grain-growth rate in Eq. (3) is fitted exclusively to sheared-cell Williamson-Hall radii from the MD simulations (0.03-1 dpa) and then transferred to the experimental series by fixing only the initial radius r0 from the experimental starting grain size; the experimental data points at higher doses are not used in the fit, so the agreement in Fig. 11(b) is an independent prediction. The Toy Model uses the same theoretical initial volume distributions (Eqs. (1) and (2)) as the MD cells, but the six exchange mechanisms are specified a priori and are tested against the MD disappearance order by chi-squared; no mechanism parameter is tuned to the MD outcome, so the 'random growth' conclusion is a statistical inference rather than a fitted result. The swelling-resistance reinterpretation in Sec. 3.2 is a reference-frame observation: Fig. 9(a) benchmarks each cell to its own 0 dpa volume, whereas Fig. 9(b) benchmarks to pristine 0 dpa; the convergence of absolute swelling at high dose is a simulation result, not an identity, so the claim that NC resistance stems from pre-existing SPD-induced swelling is an interpretation of the MD output. The paper does rely on prior work by the same group for the cascade protocol [10] and SPD cell generation [46], and it cites [10] for the athermal-regime suitability for room-temperature comparison; these are method-level self-citations, but [10] is an independent peer-reviewed simulation study and the present experimental microstrain and grain-size data provide an external benchmark. The athermal dose-rate and lack of thermal recovery is a modeling-assumption risk for the 300 K comparison, but that is a validity concern, not a circularity. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to its inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard MD methods and potentials from the authors' prior work, plus a handful of fitted distribution parameters and analysis thresholds. No new physical entities are proposed. The toy model introduces a simplified volume-exchange picture and an energy-density proxy; these are the most paper-specific assumptions.

free parameters (5)
  • b (Zipf-Mandelbrot scale) = 0.1
    Fitted to the volume distribution of sheared MD cells in Eq. (2), Section 2.1; used to generate initial grain volumes in the toy model.
  • c (Zipf-Mandelbrot exponent) = 1.51
    Fitted to the volume distribution of sheared MD cells in Eq. (2), Section 2.1.
  • MD grain-growth rate = 7.52 nm/dpa
    Linear fit to sheared-cell Williamson-Hall grain radius vs dose between 0.03 and 1 dpa, Eq. (3), Section 4; later scaled to predict experimental grain growth.
  • r0 (MD initial sheared radius) = 3.9715 nm
    Intercept of the linear fit in Eq. (3), representing mean starting radius at 0.03 dpa; the experimental prediction resets r0 to 132 nm.
  • Grain size threshold and GB exclusion distance = 100 atoms; 4 Å
    Analysis choices for grain counting (Section 3.2) and in-grain dislocation density (Section 2.5); arbitrary but consistently applied.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Mendelev Fe2 EAM potential accurately models collision cascades in iron.
    Used for all MD; justified by prior benchmark against DFT (Malerba et al. [59], Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption The athermal cascade model of Boleininger et al. [10] with 1 dpa per microsecond dose rate is representative of heavily irradiated material and comparable to room-temperature experiments.
    Stated in Section 2.2; load-bearing for transferring MD predictions to experimental data, though thermally activated recovery is neglected.
  • domain assumption Williamson-Hall analysis separates size and microstrain broadening with no dislocation contrast effects.
    Used for both MD line profiles and experimental XRD (Sections 2.5 and 2.6); standard but approximate.
  • domain assumption The Ferenc et al. [54] volume distribution (Eq. 1) describes Voronoi cells and the Zipf-Mandelbrot distribution (Eq. 2) describes sheared cells.
    Used as input to the toy model (Section 4); the authors verify Eqs. 1 and 2 against their initial cells, but the 5-grain Voronoi case has sparse data.
  • ad hoc to paper The toy model approximation of elastic energy density as U proportional to V^{-1/3} (Eq. 4) captures the relevant growth bias.
    Introduced in Section 4 as a simple proxy; not derived from MD energetics, so the EDR and EDA hypothesis tests are only as good as this proxy.
  • ad hoc to paper Grain growth in MD can be modeled as volume exchange between randomly selected grain pairs with no spatial correlation.
    The toy model (Section 4) ignores spatial adjacency and grain boundary migration physics; this is a key simplification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Atomistic and experimental study of microstructural evolution in nanocrystalline iron subjected to irradiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NCA2BJHG

@misc{pith2026250521174,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Atomistic and experimental study of microstructural evolution in nanocrystalline iron subjected to irradiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NCA2BJHG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21174}
}
read the original abstract

Nanocrystalline materials have been proposed for use in future fusion reactors due to their high grain boundary density that may act as a sink for irradiation-induced defects. We use molecular dynamics to model collision cascades in nanocrystalline iron and compare the damage evolution to that observed in initially perfect, single crystalline iron. The nanocrystalline material is generated either by Voronoi tessellation or severe plastic shearing. Upon irradiation, the grains in nanocrystalline simulations coarsen, with all ultimately becoming single crystalline above 2 dpa. Above a damage dose of 1 dpa, nanocrystalline cells show a lower dislocation density and lower lattice swelling than their initially pristine counterparts. Experimental X-ray diffraction data is collected on nanocrystalline iron samples subjected to self-ion irradiation. Line profile analysis data agrees with the trends observed in the atomistic simulations, revealing the presence of an irradiation induced annealing process, with a clear reduction in micro-strain with increasing dose. We attempt to determine why some grains in our atomistic simulations grow, while others shrink, by creating a Toy Model that simulates volume exchange between grains based on different hypothesised exchange mechanisms. This suggests that irradiation-induced grain growth is consistent with random growth.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21174 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Normalised volume against probability density for the Voronoi and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Damage profile as a function of depth calculated for 1 dpa using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. [001] pole figures for the simulation cells prior to irradiation. Figures are coloured by density with the five distinct cells being summed: (a) d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histograms of normalised frequency of grain orientations against ori [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of grain growth for a single case in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Grain size evolution with increased dose for the initially nanocrys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Histogram of dislocation segment lengths against total line length for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of volumetric swelling between simulations; (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Experimentally obtained data on ion-irradited Fe nanocrystalline samples. Line profiles obtained using grazing incidence X-ray di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Representation of the Toy Model another model is proposed in Appendix E which clarifies why it appears that the radius increases linearly with dose. Equation (3) was scaled to the experimental data by setting r0 to 132 nm, and the grain growth prediction, derived from…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. J. Kurtz, G. R. Odette, Chapter 3 - overview of reactor systems and operational environments for structural materials in fusion re- actors, in: G. R. Odette, S. J. Zinkle (Eds.), Structural Alloys for Nuclear Energy Applications, Elsevier, Boston, 2019, pp. 51–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397046-6.00003-4. URL https://www.sciencedirect.co...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397046-6.00003-4 2019

  2. [2]

    S. Sato, K. Maki, Analytical representation for neutron stream- ing through slits in fusion reactor blanket by monte carlo calcu- lation, Fusion Engineering and Design 65 (4) (2003) 501–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(03)00003-6. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379603000036

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(03)00003-6 2003

  3. [3]

    Reali, M

    L. Reali, M. R. Gilbert, M. Boleininger, S. L. Dudarev, Intense γ-photon and high-energy electron production by neutron irradiation: E ffects of nuclear excitations on reactor materials, PRX Energy 2 (2023) 023008. doi:10.1103/PRXEnergy.2.023008. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXEnergy.2.023008

    work page doi:10.1103/prxenergy.2.023008 2023

  4. [4]

    Gilbert, J

    M. Gilbert, J. Marian, J.-C. Sublet, Energy spectra of primary knock-on atoms under neutron irradiation, Journal of Nuclear Materials 467 (2015) 121–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.023. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022311515302129

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.023 2015

  5. [5]

    El-Atwani, J

    O. El-Atwani, J. Nathaniel, A. Le ff, K. Hattar, M. Taheri, Direct observa- tion of sink-dependent defect evolution in nanocrystalline iron under irra- diation, Scientific Reports 7 (12 2017). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01744-

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01744- 2017

  6. [6]

    X. Hu, T. Koyanagi, M. Fukuda, N. K. Kumar, L. L. Snead, B. D. Wirth, Y . Katoh, Irradiation hardening of pure tungsten exposed to neutron irradiation, Journal of Nuclear Materials 480 (2016) 235–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.08.024. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022311516303543

    doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.08.024 2016

  7. [7]

    Dubinko, D

    A. Dubinko, D. Terentyev, C. Yin, W. Van Renterghem, B. Rossaert, M. Rieth, E. Zhurkin, A. Zinovev, C. Chang, S. Van Dyck, G. Bonny, Microstructure and hardening induced by neutron irradiation in sin- gle crystal, iter specification and cold rolled tungsten, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 98 (2021) 105522. doi:https://doi.or...

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    P.-W. Ma, D. R. Mason, S. Van Boxel, S. L. Dudarev, Athermal evolution of nanocrystalline tungsten driven by ir- radiation, Journal of Nuclear Materials 586 (2023) 154662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154662. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022311523004300

    arXiv 2023

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    J. Wu, F. Granberg, Simulation of defect build-up in tungsten during low energy irradiation, Journal of Nuclear Materials 586 (2023) 154653. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154653. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002231152300421X

    2023

  2. [10]

    Boleininger, D

    M. Boleininger, D. R. Mason, A. E. Sand, S. L. Dudarev, Microstructure of a heavily irradiated metal exposed to a spectrum of atomic recoils, Scientific Reports 13 (01 2023). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27087-w

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Granberg, J

    F. Granberg, J. Byggm ¨astar, K. Nordlund, Defect accumu- lation and evolution during prolonged irradiation of fe and fecr alloys, Journal of Nuclear Materials 528 (2020) 151843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151843. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/artic...

    2020

  4. [12]

    A. Sand, J. Byggm ¨astar, A. Zitting, K. Nordlund, Defect structures and statistics in overlapping cascade damage in fusion-relevant bcc metals, Journal of Nuclear Materials 511 (2018) 64–74, special Sec- tion on ”18th International Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials”. doi...

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    K. Song, D. Sheyfer, K. Mizohata, M. Zhang, W. Liu, D. G ¨ursoy, D. Yang, I. Tolkachev, H. Yu, D. E. Armstrong, F. Hofmann, Dose and compositional dependence of irradiation-induced prop- erty change in fecr, Journal of Nuclear Materials 594 (2024) 154998. doi:https://doi.org/1...

    2024

  6. [14]

    K. Song, G. He, A. Reza, T. Ung ´ar, P. Karamched, D. Yang, I. Tolkachev, K. Mizohata, S. P. Thompson, E. T. Connolly, R. C. Atwood, S. Michalik, D. E. Armstrong, F. Hofmann, Microstructural and material property changes in severely deformed eurofer-97, Materials Characterizat...

    2024

  7. [15]

    A. Reza, G. He, C. A. Dennett, H. Yu, K. Mizohata, F. Hofmann, Thermal diffusivity recovery and defect annealing kinetics of self-ion implanted tungsten probed by insitu transient grating spectroscopy, Acta Materialia 232 (2022) 117926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.20...

    2022

  8. [16]

    Hofmann, D

    F. Hofmann, D. R. Mason, J. K. Eliason, A. A. Maznev, K. A. Nel- son, S. L. Dudarev, Non-contact measurement of thermal di ffusiv- ity in ion-implanted nuclear materials, Scientific Reports 5 (05 2015). doi:10.1038/srep16042

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    Beyerlein, M

    I. Beyerlein, M. Demkowicz, A. Misra, B. Uberuaga, Defect-interface interactions, Progress in Materials Science 74 (2015) 125–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079642515000225

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    Samaras, P

    M. Samaras, P. M. Derlet, H. Van Swygenhoven, M. Victoria, Computer simulation of displacement cascades in nanocrystalline ni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 125505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.125505. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.125505

    2002 doi

  11. [19]

    X.-M. Bai, A. F. V oter, R. G. Hoagland, M. Nastasi, B. P. Uberu- aga, E fficient annealing of radiation damage near grain boundaries via interstitial emission, Science 327 (5973) (2010) 1631–1634. arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1183723, doi:10.1126/scie...

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    M. A. Tschopp, K. N. Solanki, F. Gao, X. Sun, M. A. Khaleel, M. F. Horstemeyer, Probing grain boundary sink strength at the nanoscale: Energetics and length scales of vacancy and interstitial absorption by grain boundaries in α-fe, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 064108. doi:10.1103/Ph...

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    N. Nita, R. Schaeublin, M. Victoria, Impact of irradiation on the microstructure of nanocrystalline materials, Journal of Nuclear Materials 329-333 (2004) 953–957, proceedings of the 11th In- ternational Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-11). doi:https://doi.org/10...

    2004 doi

  14. [22]

    Chimi, A

    Y . Chimi, A. Iwase, N. Ishikawa, M. Kobiyama, T. Inami, S. Okuda, Accumulation and recovery of defects in ion-irradiated nanocrys- talline gold, Journal of Nuclear Materials 297 (3) (2001) 355–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00629-8. URL https://www.sciencedire...

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    Q. Wei, T. Jiao, K. Ramesh, E. Ma, L. Kecskes, L. Magness, R. Dowding, V . Kazykhanov, R. Valiev, Mechanical behavior and dynamic failure of high-strength ultrafine grained tungsten un- der uniaxial compression, Acta Materialia 54 (1) (2006) 77–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    2006 doi

  16. [24]

    Meyers, A

    M. Meyers, A. Mishra, D. Benson, Mechanical properties of nanocrys- talline materials, Progress in Materials Science 51 (4) (2006) 427–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079642505000447

    2006 doi

  17. [25]

    Y . Wang, M. Chen, F. Zhou, E. Ma, High tensile ductility in a nanostruc- tured metal, Nature 419 (2002) 912–915. doi:10.1038/nature01133. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01133

    2002 doi

  18. [26]

    P. Wang, D. Thompson, W. Smeltzer, Implantation of ni thin films and single crystals with ag ions, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 7-8 (1985) 97–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(85)90536-1. URL...

    1985

  19. [27]

    H. A. Atwater, C. V . Thompson, H. I. Smith, Ion- bombardment-enhanced grain growth in germanium, sili- con, and gold thin films, Journal of Applied Physics 64 (5) (1988) 2337–2353. arXiv:https: //pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/64/5/2337/18619198/2337 1 online.pdf, doi:10.1...

    1988 doi

  20. [28]

    D. C. Bu fford, F. F. Abdeljawad, S. M. Foiles, K. Hattar, Unraveling irradiation induced grain growth with in situ transmission electron microscopy and coordinated modeling, Applied Physics Letters 107 (19) (2015) 191901. arXiv:https: //pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/1...

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    Kaoumi, A

    D. Kaoumi, A. T. Motta, R. C. Birtcher, A thermal spike model of grain growth under irradiation, Journal of Applied Physics 104 (7) (2008) 073525. arXiv:https: //pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2988142/15021068/073525 1 online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.2988142. URL ht...

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    El-Atwani, E

    O. El-Atwani, E. Esquivel, E. Aydogan, E. Martinez, J. Baldwin, M. Li, B. Uberuaga, S. Maloy, Unprecedented irradiation resistance of nanocrystalline tungsten with equiaxed nanocrystalline grains to dislocation loop accumulation, Acta Materialia 165 (2019) 118–128. doi:https:/...

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    M. Rose, A. Balogh, H. Hahn, Instability of irradiation induced de- fects in nanostructured materials, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 127-128 (1997) 119–122, ion Beam Modification of Materials. doi:http...

    1997 doi

  24. [32]

    S. Dey, J. W. Drazin, Y . Wang, J. A. Valdez, H. T. G., B. P. Uberuaga, Ra- diation tolerance of nanocrystalline ceramics: Insights from yttria stabi- lized zirconia, Scientific Reports 5 (2015) 7746. doi:10.1038/srep07746. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07746

    2015 doi

  25. [34]

    P.-W. Ma, D. R. Mason, S. Van Boxel, S. L. Dudarev, Nanocrystalline tungsten at high radiation exposure, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 (2024) 083601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.083601. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.083601

    2024 doi

  26. [35]

    P. M. Derlet, S. L. Dudarev, Microscopic structure of a heav- ily irradiated material, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 (2020) 023605. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.023605. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.023605

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    E. Levo, F. Granberg, D. Utt, K. Nordlund, F. Djurabekova, Radiation stability of nanocrystalline single-phase multicomponent alloys, Journal of Materials Research 34 (2019) 854–866. doi:10.1557/jmr.2019.19

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    Granberg, K

    F. Granberg, K. Nordlund, M. W. Ullah, K. Jin, C. Lu, H. Bei, L. M. Wang, F. Djurabekova, W. J. Weber, Y . Zhang, Mech- anism of radiation damage reduction in equiatomic multicom- ponent single phase alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 135504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.13550...

    2016 doi

  29. [38]

    K. M. Agarwal, R. K. Tyagi, V . K. Chaubey, A. Dixit, Comparison of different methods of severe plastic deformation for grain refinement, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 691 (2019) 012074. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/691/1/012074. URL https://iopscience.iop....

    2019 doi

  30. [39]

    Borodachenkova, W

    M. Borodachenkova, W. Wen, A. M. de Bastos Pereira, High-pressure tor- sion: Experiments and modeling, Severe Plastic Deformation Techniques (2017) 45–67doi:10.5772/intechopen.69173. URL https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69173

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    Zhilyaev, K

    A. Zhilyaev, K. Oh-ishi, T. Langdon, T. McNelley, Microstructural evolution in commercial purity aluminum during high-pressure torsion, Materials Science and Engineering: A 410-411 (2005) 277–280, the Langdon Symposium: Flow and forming of Crystalline Materials. doi:https://do...

    2005 doi

  32. [41]

    Y . Ito, Z. Horita, Microstructural evolution in pure aluminum pro- cessed by high-pressure torsion, Materials Science and Engineering: A 503 (1) (2009) 32–36, international Symposium on Bulk Nanos- tructured Materials: from Fundamentals to Innovation, BNM 2007. doi:https://do...

    2009 doi

  33. [42]

    Strangward-Pryce, K

    G. Strangward-Pryce, K. Song, K. Mizohata, F. Hofmann, The e ffect of high-pressure torsion on irradiation hardening of eurofer-97, Nuclear Materials and Energy 36 (2023) 101468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2023.101468. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/p...

    2023

  34. [43]

    Alsabbagh, A

    A. Alsabbagh, A. Sarkar, B. Miller, J. Burns, L. Squires, D. Porter, J. I. Cole, K. Murty, Microstructure and mechanical behavior of neutron irra- 21 diated ultrafine grained ferritic steel, Materials Science and Engineering: A 615 (2014) 128–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j...

    2014 doi

  35. [44]

    Schiøtz, K

    J. Schiøtz, K. W. Jacobsen, A maximum in the strength of nanocrystalline copper, Science 301 (5638) (2003) 1357–1359. arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1086636, doi:10.1126/science.1086636. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1086636

    2003 doi

  36. [45]

    Guo, D.-D

    X.-X. Guo, D.-D. Jiang, J.-L. Shao, Atomistic simulation of structural transition and grain refinement in Fe nanowires driven by high strain rate compression, Journal of Applied Physics 135 (3) (2024) 035102. doi:10.1063/5.0176619. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0176619

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    Tolkachev, P.-W

    I. Tolkachev, P.-W. Ma, D. R. Mason, F. Hofmann, Simulations of nanocrystalline iron formation under high shear strain, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9 (2025) 016001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.016001. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.016001

    2025 doi

  38. [47]

    F. A. Garner, M. B. Toloczko, B. H. Sencer, Comparison of swelling and irradiation creep behavior of fcc-austenitic and bcc-ferritic /martensitic alloys at high neutron exposure, Journal of Nuclear Materials 276 (1) (2000) 123–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(99)002...

    2000 doi

  39. [48]

    Boutard, A

    J.-L. Boutard, A. Alamo, R. Lindau, M. Rieth, Fissile core and Tritium-Breeding Blanket: structural materials and their re- quirements, Comptes Rendus. Physique 9 (3-4) (2008) 287–302. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2007.11.004

    2008 doi

  40. [49]

    Cabet, F

    C. Cabet, F. Dalle, E. Gaganidze, J. Henry, H. Tanigawa, Ferritic-martensitic steels for fission and fusion applica- tions, Journal of Nuclear Materials 523 (2019) 510–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.05.058. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii...

    2019 doi

  41. [50]

    Mazzone, J

    G. Mazzone, J. Aktaa, C. Bachmann, D. De Meis, P. Frosi, E. Gaganidze, G. Di Gironimo, G. Mariano, D. Marzullo, M. Porfiri, M. Rieth, R. Villari, J. You, Choice of a low operating temperature for the demo eurofer97 divertor cassette, Fusion Engineering and Design 124 (2017) 65...

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    Granberg, J

    F. Granberg, J. Byggm ¨astar, K. Nordlund, Molecular dynamics simulations of high-dose damage production and defect evolu- tion in tungsten, Journal of Nuclear Materials 556 (2021) 153158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153158. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci...

    2021

  43. [52]

    V oronoi, Nouvelles applications des param `etres continus `a la th ´eorie des formes quadratiques

    G. V oronoi, Nouvelles applications des param `etres continus `a la th ´eorie des formes quadratiques. premier m ´emoire. sur quelques propri ´et´es des formes quadratiques positives parfaites., Journal f ¨ur die reine und ange- wandte Mathematik 133 (1908) 97–178. URL http://...

    1908

  44. [53]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S. J. Plimpton, Lammps - a flexible simulation tool for particle- based material...

    2022

  45. [54]

    Ferenc, Z

    J.-S. Ferenc, Z. N ´eda, On the size distribution of poisson voronoi cells, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 385 (2) (2007) 518–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.063. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437107007546

    2007 doi

  46. [55]

    Mandlebrot, An informational theory of the statistical structure of lan- guage, Communication Theory (1953) 486–502

    B. Mandlebrot, An informational theory of the statistical structure of lan- guage, Communication Theory (1953) 486–502

    1953

  47. [56]

    M. I. Mendelev, S. Han, D. J. Srolovitz, G. J. Ackland, D. Y . Sun, M. Asta, Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crys- talline and liquid iron, Philosophical Magazine 83 (35) (2003) 3977–

    2003

  48. [57]

    Kedharnath, R

    A. Kedharnath, R. Kapoor, A. Sarkar, Atomistic simulation of in- teraction of collision cascade with di fferent types of grain bound- aries in alpha-fe, Journal of Nuclear Materials 523 (2019) 444–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.06.021. URL https://www.scienced...

    2019 doi

  49. [58]

    T. Ye, H. Yao, Y . Wu, J. Zhang, J. Wu, M. Wang, W. Tian, G. Su, S. Qiu, Primary radiation damage characteristics in displacement cascades of fecral alloys, Journal of Nuclear Materials 549 (2021) 152909. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152909. URL https://www.scien...

    2021

  50. [59]

    Malerba, M

    L. Malerba, M. Marinica, N. Anento, C. Bj ¨orkas, H. Nguyen, C. Do- main, F. Djurabekova, P. Olsson, K. Nordlund, A. Serra, D. Terentyev, F. Willaime, C. Becquart, Comparison of empirical interatomic po- tentials for iron applied to radiation damage studies, Journal of Nuclear...

    2010 doi

  51. [60]

    J. F. Ziegler, Srim-2003, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Re- search Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 219-220 (2004) 1027–1036, proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Ion Beam Analysis. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.0...

    2004 doi

  52. [61]

    Stoller, M

    R. Stoller, M. Toloczko, G. Was, A. Certain, S. Dwaraknath, F. Gar- ner, On the use of srim for computing radiation damage exposure, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 310 (2013) 75–80. doi:https://doi.org/...

    2013 doi

  53. [62]

    De Backer, A

    A. De Backer, A. E. Sand, K. Nordlund, L. Luneville, D. Simeone, S. L. Dudarev, Subcascade formation and defect cluster size scaling in high- energy collision events in metals, Europhysics Letters 115 (2) (2016) 26001. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/115/26001. URL https://dx.doi.org/10...

    2016 doi

  54. [63]

    Lindhard, M

    J. Lindhard, M. Schar ff, Energy dissipation by ions in the kev region, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 128–130. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.128. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.124.128

    1961 doi

  55. [64]

    M. T. Robinson, I. M. Torrens, Computer simulation of atomic- displacement cascades in solids in the binary-collision approximation, Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 5008–5024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.9.5008. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.9.5008

    1974 doi

  56. [65]

    Norgett, M

    M. Norgett, M. Robinson, I. Torrens, A proposed method of calculating displacement dose rates, Nuclear Engineering and Design 33 (1) (1975) 50–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(75)90035-7. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0029549375900357

    1975

  57. [66]

    Mason, Incorporating non-adiabatic e ffects in embedded atom po- tentials for radiation damage cascade simulations, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27 (14) (2015) 145401

    D. Mason, Incorporating non-adiabatic e ffects in embedded atom po- tentials for radiation damage cascade simulations, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27 (14) (2015) 145401. doi:10.1088 /0953- 8984/27/14/145401. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/14/145401

    2015 doi

  58. [67]

    L. C. J. Procurement of pure fe metal and fe-based alloys with con- trolled chemical alloying element contents and microstructure, Tech. Rep. EFDA–Contract 06–1901 TW6–TTMS 007-PUREFE, ARMINES ´Ecole Nationale Sup´erieure des Mines (2007)

    2007

  59. [68]

    Fraczkiewicz, Material delivery report bc4000483543 /p5b51, Tech

    A. Fraczkiewicz, Material delivery report bc4000483543 /p5b51, Tech. Rep. BC4000483543/P5B51, ´Ecole des Mines, France (2011)

    2011

  60. [69]

    Agarwal, Y

    S. Agarwal, Y . Lin, C. Li, R. Stoller, S. Zinkle, On the use of srim for calculating vacancy production: Quick calculation and full-cascade options, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 503 (2021) 11–29. doi...

    2021 doi

  61. [70]

    Tejedor, K

    R. Tejedor, K. Edalati, J. A. Benito, Z. Horita, J. M. Cabrera, High- pressure torsion of iron with various purity levels and validation of hall-petch strengthening mechanism, Materials Science and Engineering: A 743 (2019) 597–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.11.1...

    2019 doi

  62. [71]

    Edalati, T

    K. Edalati, T. Fujioka, Z. Horita, Evolution of mechanical properties and microstructures with equivalent strain in pure fe processed by high pressure torsion, MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS 50 (1) (2009) 44–50. doi:10.2320/matertrans.MD200812

    2009 doi

  63. [72]

    J. F. Ziegler, M. Ziegler, J. Biersack, Srim – the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 22 268 (11) (2010) 1818–1823, 19th International Conference on Ion Beam Ana...

    2010 doi

  64. [73]

    Caglioti, A

    G. Caglioti, A. Paoletti, F. Ricci, Choice of collimators for a crystal spectrometer for neutron di ffraction, Nuclear Instruments 3 (4) (1958) 223–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0369-643X(58)90029-X. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0369643X5890029X

    1958

  65. [74]

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool, Modelling and Simulation in Ma- terials Science and Engineering 18 (1) (2009) 015012. doi:10.1088/0965- 0393/18/1/015012. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    2009 doi

  66. [75]

    P. M. Larsen, S. Schmidt, J. Schiøtz, Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching, Modelling and Simulation in Mate- rials Science and Engineering 24 (5) (2016) 055007. doi:10.1088 /0965- 0393/24/5/055007. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007

    2016 doi

  67. [76]

    J. S. Dai, Euler–rodrigues formula variations, quaternion conjugation and intrinsic connections, Mechanism and Machine Theory 92 (2015) 144–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.03.004. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094114X15000415

    2015 doi

  68. [77]

    Albou, J

    A. Albou, J. Driver, C. Maurice, Microband evolution during large plastic strains of stable 110 ⟨112⟩ al and al–mn crystals, Acta Materialia 58 (8) (2010) 3022–3034. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.034. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S13596...

    2010 doi

  69. [78]

    Stukowski, V

    A. Stukowski, V . V . Bulatov, A. Arsenlis, Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces, Modelling and Sim- ulation in Materials Science and Engineering 20 (8) (2012) 085007. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0965...

    2012 doi

  70. [79]

    Debye, Zerstreuung von r ¨ontgenstrahlen, An- nalen der Physik 351 (6) (1915) 809–823

    P. Debye, Zerstreuung von r ¨ontgenstrahlen, An- nalen der Physik 351 (6) (1915) 809–823. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.19153510606, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19153510606. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19153510606

    1915 doi

  71. [80]

    Williamson, W

    G. Williamson, W. Hall, X-ray line broadening from filed alu- minium and wolfram, Acta Metallurgica 1 (1) (1953) 22–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001616053900066

    1953

  72. [81]

    Yates, Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the Chi Squared Test, Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Soci- ety 1 (2) (2018) 217–235

    F. Yates, Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the Chi Squared Test, Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Soci- ety 1 (2) (2018) 217–235. arXiv:https: //academic.oup.com/jrsssb/article- pdf/1/2/217/49093105/jrsssb 1 2 217.pdf, doi:10.2307/2983604. URL h...

    2018 doi

  73. [82]

    J. G. Gigax, H. Kim, T. Chen, F. Garner, L. Shao, Radia- tion instability of equal channel angular extruded t91 at ultra- high damage levels, Acta Materialia 132 (2017) 395–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.038. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/articl...

    2017 doi

  74. [83]

    M. Song, Y . Wu, D. Chen, X. Wang, C. Sun, K. Yu, Y . Chen, L. Shao, Y . Yang, K. Hartwig, X. Zhang, Response of equal channel angular extrusion processed ultrafine-grained t91 steel subjected to high tem- perature heavy ion irradiation, Acta Materialia 74 (2014) 285–295. doi:...

    2014 doi

  75. [84]

    Srinivasan, C

    S. Srinivasan, C. Kale, B. Hornbuckle, K. Darling, M. Chancey, E. Hern ´andez-Rivera, Y . Chen, T. Koenig, Y . Wang, G. Thompson, K. Solanki, Radiation tolerance and microstructural changes of nanocrys- talline cu-ta alloy to high dose self-ion irradiation, Acta Materialia 195...

    2020 doi

  76. [85]

    C. Sun, S. Zheng, C. e. a. Wei, Superior radiation-resistant na- noengineered austenitic 304l stainless steel for applications in ex- treme radiation environments, Scientific Reports 5 (7801) (2015). doi:doi.org/10.1038/srep07801. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07801citeas

    2015 doi

  77. [86]

    S. Das, W. Liu, R. Xu, F. Hofmann, Helium-implantation- induced lattice strains and defects in tungsten probed by x-ray micro-diffraction, Materials and Design 160 (2018) 1226–1237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...

    2018 doi

  78. [87]

    Hofmann, D

    F. Hofmann, D. Nguyen-Manh, M. Gilbert, C. Beck, J. Eliason, A. Maznev, W. Liu, D. Armstrong, K. Nelson, S. Dudarev, Lattice swelling and modulus change in a helium-implanted tungsten al- loy: X-ray micro-di ffraction, surface acoustic wave measurements, and multiscale modelli...

    2015 doi

  79. [88]

    P.-W. Ma, S. L. Dudarev, Universality of point defect structure in body-centered cubic metals, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 (2019) 013605. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.013605. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.013605

    2019 doi

  80. [89]

    Novikov, Texture development during grain growth in polycrystals with strong preferred orientation, Acta Materialia 47 (6) (1999) 1935–

    V . Novikov, Texture development during grain growth in polycrystals with strong preferred orientation, Acta Materialia 47 (6) (1999) 1935–

    1999

  81. [1943]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645499000415 23

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00041-5. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645499000415 23

    doi

  82. [3994]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430310001613264

    doi:10.1080/14786430310001613264. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430310001613264

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.