Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

On the Modulation of Wave Trains in the Ostrovsky Equation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that for periodic traveling waves of the Ostrovsky equation, strict hyperbolicity of the Whitham modulation system implies spectral stability near the origin, while ellipticity implies spectral instability.

desk verdict Solid Whitham-to-spectral bridge for the Ostrovsky equation at fixed γ, with a genuine but repairable gap in the stability half of Theorem 1.3: the stated fixed-ξ reflection symmetry (4.6) is false, and the algebra that follows from it does not close. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21466 v1 pith:LNSW2ZUZ submitted 2025-05-27 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Mathew A. Johnson , Jeffrey Oregero , Wesley R. Perkins This is my paper
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35B3535C0735Q5376B15
keywords OstrovskyequationWhithammodulationtheorymodulationalstabilityspectralperiodictravelingwaveslinearoperatorpencilsFloquet-BlochLighthillcriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For periodic wave trains of the Ostrovsky equation—a model of unidirectional ocean and internal waves in a rotating fluid—this paper turns Whitham's formal modulation criterion into a theorem. It derives a two-by-two quasilinear system governing slow changes in wavenumber and momentum, then uses Floquet–Bloch theory and spectral perturbation theory for linear operator pencils to show that the eigenvalues of the Whitham matrix are exactly the slopes of the two spectral curves near the origin. Consequently, when the Whitham system is strictly hyperbolic the wave train is spectrally modulationally stable, and when it is elliptic the wave train is spectrally unstable. The result covers arbitrary-amplitude wave trains, not just small-amplitude Stokes waves, and reduces modulational stability to checking the eigenvalues of an explicit $2\times2$ matrix.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the linear operator pencil $L[\phi]v=\lambda k\partial_\theta v$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R})$, where $L[\phi]=\gamma+k^2\partial_\theta^2(c-\phi-\beta k^2\partial_\theta^2)$ is a fourth-order operator with periodic coefficients and $k\partial_\theta$ is the Bloch momentum operator. Because $\partial_\theta$ is not invertible on $L^2(\mathbb{R})$, the problem cannot be reduced to a standard eigenvalue problem; the paper works directly with the pencil, decomposes the spectrum by Floquet–Bloch theory, and follows the two eigenvalues that bifurcate from the doubly degenerate generalized kernel at $(\lambda,\xi)=(0,0)$ using perturbation theory for pencils. The Whitham matrix $W(\phi)$, obtained from averaged conservation laws in the multiple-scales derivation, is then shown by direct calculation to equal $M_0(\phi)-cI$, and this identity carries the argument.

What would settle it

Numerically continue a moderate-amplitude periodic wave at a fixed $\gamma>0$, compute both the eigenvalues of the Whitham matrix and the Floquet–Bloch spectrum of the linearized pencil near $\lambda=0$, and look for a case with real distinct Whitham eigenvalues whose spectral curves leave the imaginary axis for $|\xi|\ll1$; such a case would refute the sufficiency half of Theorem 1.3. A second route is to exhibit two distinct nearby periodic profiles with the same wavenumber and momentum, which would falsify Assumption 2.1 and remove the basis for the $2\times2$ reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.3: for a $T_0=1/k_0$ periodic traveling wave solution $\phi_0$ of the Ostrovsky equation, under the assumption that nearby periodic profiles form a two-dimensional smooth manifold parameterized by wavenumber $k$ and momentum $P$, strict hyperbolicity of the Whitham modulation system at $(k_0,P(\phi_0))$ implies that the $L^2(\mathbb{R})$-spectrum of the linearized problem is purely imaginary in a sufficiently small neighborhood of the origin, which is spectral modulational stability; ellipticity of the Whitham system, meaning its eigenvalues have nonzero imaginary part, is sufficient for spectral instability. The proof identifies the Whitham matrix $W(\phi)$ term by term with the matrix $M_0(\phi)$ that rigorously describes the two spectral curves near $\lambda=0$, up to a shift by the constant wave speed $cI$. Since the shift is purely imaginary, the formal stability criterion from Whitham's modulation theory and the rigorous spectral stability problem coincide for every amplitude covered by the structural assumptions.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that all nearby periodic traveling waves, at general amplitude and general rotation parameter, lie on a smooth two-dimensional surface coordinated by wavenumber and momentum; this has been rigorously established only for small-amplitude Stokes waves and in the weak-rotation limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Modulational stability of any wave train covered by the structural assumptions reduces to checking whether the two eigenvalues of the explicit $2\times2$ matrix $W(\phi_0)$ are real and distinct; no full spectral computation is required.
  • For small-amplitude Stokes waves the theorem reproduces the Lighthill criterion: stability when $\omega_0''(k)\omega_2(k)>0$, instability when the product is negative, with a critical wavenumber $k_c\sim(\gamma/|\beta|)^{1/4}$ separating the regimes.
  • Well-conditioned numerical evaluation of the Whitham matrix at arbitrary amplitude becomes a rigorous route to stability conclusions: hyperbolicity or ellipticity of $W$ gives spectral stability or instability without solving the linearized PDE.
  • In the reduced Ostrovsky model ($\beta=0$), the analysis predicts an always-hyperbolic Whitham system, consistent with the known orbital stability of all periodic waves in that model.
  • The sufficiency of strict hyperbolicity uses the Hamiltonian spectral symmetry $\lambda\mapsto-\lambda$; in dissipative or non-Hamiltonian versions of the model the same conclusion would not follow from hyperbolicity alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the identity $W=M_0-cI$ is probably a general phenomenon: any Hamiltonian dispersive equation with a two-parameter family of periodic waves parameterized by wavenumber and a conserved quantity should admit the same rigorous justification of Whitham's criterion, provided the generalized kernel at $\lambda=0$ has algebraic multiplicity two.
  • Beyond the paper, at parameter values where Assumption 2.1 fails—for example where a reparameterization from amplitude-type variables to $(k,P)$ degenerates—the Whitham system would no longer be an evolution equation and the theorem's dichotomy should break down; numerical continuation could locate such points as transition boundaries for wave-train dynamics.
  • Beyond the paper, the proof indicates that strict hyperbolicity alone would not imply stability if the Hamiltonian spectral symmetry were broken; adding weak dissipation to the Ostrovsky equation would make the $O(\xi^2)$ terms decisive and give a testable route beyond the conservative model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies modulational stability of periodic traveling wave solutions of the Ostrovsky equation (1.2) for arbitrary amplitude, not only the small-amplitude Stokes regime. The authors first derive, by a multiple-scales/WKB argument, a 2×2 Whitham modulation system (3.10) for the slow evolution of the wavenumber k and momentum P, with associated matrix W(ϕ) in (3.12). They then set up the linearized spectral problem as the operator pencil L[ϕ]v = λk∂θv on L2(R), reduce it via Floquet-Bloch theory to a family of 1-periodic pencils (4.5), and use spectral perturbation theory to show that near the origin the spectrum consists of two curves whose leading slopes are the eigenvalues of a matrix M0(ϕ) in (4.29). The central theorem, Theorem 1.3, asserts that strict hyperbolicity of W at (k0,P(ϕ0)) implies spectral modulational stability near the origin, while ellipticity implies spectral instability. The proof of the stability half rests on the identity W(ϕ)=M0(ϕ)-cI established in Section 5 and on a spectral symmetry stated in Remark 4.4.

Significance. If the proof is repaired, the significance is substantial. The paper provides the first general-amplitude, fixed-γ Whitham modulation system for the Ostrovsky equation and a rigorous spectral-perturbation justification of the Whitham criterion, extending the recent small-amplitude result of [5] to the full two-parameter family of periodic traveling waves. The computation of the key identity W = M0 - cI is direct and parameter-free, and the Stokes-wave analysis in Section 3.2 correctly recovers the Lighthill criterion, including the known frequency cutoff. The paper is also careful to state its structural Assumptions 2.1 and 2.3, which are verified in the Stokes and weak-rotation limits but not for general amplitude; this is a genuine limitation but an explicit one. The main obstacle is not the computational core but the final step of the stability proof, which uses a symmetry that is false as stated and an algebraic inference that does not follow.

major comments (2)
  1. [Remark 4.4, Eq. (4.6)] The symmetry (4.6), claimed to hold for fixed ξ, is false for ξ ≠ 0. Substituting v(θ)=w(-θ) into (4.5) sends Lξ to L_{-ξ} and turns k(∂θ+iξ) into -k(∂_θ-iξ), so the transformation maps the pair (ξ,λ) to (-ξ,-λ), not to the same ξ with λ replaced by -λ. Therefore the assertion that for fixed ξ the eigenvalues are symmetric about the imaginary axis is not established by (4.6). The valid fixed-ξ symmetry, coming from the Hamiltonian structure, is λ ↦ -conj(λ); with this symmetry the conclusion that each λ_j(ξ) is purely imaginary can likely be recovered when the leading slopes are real and distinct, but this is not the argument presented in the paper.
  2. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.3 after Eq. (5.3)] Even if one granted λ1(ξ)=-λ2(ξ), the inference that this implies α1=α2 is algebraically incorrect. Inserting the expansions λj(ξ)=i(αj+c)ξ+O(ξ²) into λ1(ξ)=-λ2(ξ) gives α1+α2+2c=0, not α1=α2. This condition can hold while α1 and α2 are real and distinct, so it produces no contradiction with strict hyperbolicity of W. A correct argument would use the Hamiltonian symmetry λ ↦ -conj(λ) at fixed ξ: if λ_j(ξ) had non-zero real part, then -conj(λ_j(ξ)) would have to be the other spectral curve, whose leading term would force α_j=α_k for j≠k, contradicting distinctness. As written, the stability half of Theorem 1.3 is unsupported, and the same gap affects the corresponding claim in the proof of Theorem 4.7.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected in revision, including 'modualtion', 'Graham-Schmidt', 'lineraized', 'Morevoer', and 'neighbohrood'.
  2. [Remark 4.4] The second symmetry stated in the same remark, (w,λ,ξ) ↦ (w,λ,-ξ), is correct and sufficient for restricting to ξ>0; the authors may wish to retain only this symmetry and replace the false fixed-ξ statement with the Hamiltonian λ ↦ -conj(λ) symmetry.
  3. [Section 6] The claim that all calculations in Sections 3-5 'continue verbatim' in the β=0 reduced Ostrovsky case is stated rather than demonstrated, and it is explicitly conditional on Assumptions 2.1 and 2.3; adding a short verification of the key steps for β=0 would strengthen this section.
  4. [Assumption 2.1] Since Theorem 1.3 is formulated under Assumption 2.1, the authors should state more prominently in the introduction or in Theorem 1.3 that the general-amplitude validity of this assumption is an open problem, and that the rigorous result is conditional on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Whitham and spectral matrices are derived independently and identified by a direct computation.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which an output is equivalent to an input by construction or in which a fitted or assumed quantity is renamed as a prediction. The Whitham matrix W in (3.12) comes from the WKB solvability condition in Section 3.1; the rigorous matrix M0 in (4.29) comes from an independent Floquet-Bloch and spectral-perturbation calculation in Section 4.3. The two are compared in Section 5, where the identity W(phi) = M0(phi) - cI is proved row-by-row using the definitions of L1, L2, the generalized kernel basis, and differentiation of the conserved quantities; no Whitham eigenvalue is inserted into the spectral calculation, and no spectral output is fed back into the Whitham derivation. Assumptions 2.1 and 2.3 are explicit hypotheses, and although they are used both in the formal Whitham reduction and in the rigorous generalized-kernel construction, that is a shared hypothesis rather than a circular reduction. The Stokes-wave analysis of Section 3.2 is a consistency check, not a prediction derived from the theorem; the self-citations [5,46] are not load-bearing for Theorem 1.3 because [5] is used only to contextualize the Stokes regime and [46] only to contrast the weak-rotation limit. Two genuine concerns appear, but both are outside the circularity category: Assumption 2.1 is verified only in asymptotic regimes and is otherwise an unproven premise, and the fixed-xi reflection symmetry (4.6) used in Section 5 appears algebraically false (it maps xi to -xi), which would leave the stability half of Theorem 1.3 unsupported as written; a Hamiltonian lambda -> -lambda-bar symmetry would likely repair it. Neither concern makes the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem rests on two structural assumptions about the solution manifold and nondegeneracy of the linearization, both explicitly flagged by the authors as assumptions. The spectral perturbation framework is standard.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The set of periodic traveling wave solutions forms a two-dimensional smooth manifold locally parameterized by wavenumber k and momentum P (Assumption 2.1).
    Invoked for the Whitham derivation (Section 3.1) and the spectral kernel calculation (Theorem 4.6). Known only in the Stokes wave and weak-rotation limits (citations [5,8,20] in the paper), not for general amplitudes or general gamma.
  • domain assumption The Hessian of the action has kernel exactly span{phi'} (Assumption 2.3).
    Used in Lemma 2.5 to determine ker L and ker L†, which gives the one-dimensional adjoint null space used in the Whitham solvability condition and the two-dimensional generalized kernel in Theorem 4.6. Verified in [5,20] for small-amplitude and weak-rotation waves.
  • domain assumption The wave profile phi(.;k,P) is even.
    Part of Assumption 2.1; used in Remark 4.4 to justify the reflection symmetry of the spectral problem, which is central to the proof of Theorem 1.3.
  • standard math Spectral perturbation theory for linear operator pencils (Kato; Moeller-Pivovarchik).
    Used in Section 4.3 and Lemma A.5 to track the two eigenvalues bifurcating from the double eigenvalue at lambda = 0.
  • standard math Floquet-Bloch theory for periodic-coefficient operator pencils.
    Used in Section 4.1 and Appendix A to decompose the L2(R) spectrum into a union of periodic eigenvalue problems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Modulation of Wave Trains in the Ostrovsky Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LNSW2ZUZ

@misc{pith2026250521466,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Modulation of Wave Trains in the Ostrovsky Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LNSW2ZUZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21466}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the nonlinear wave modulation of arbitrary amplitude periodic traveling wave solutions of the Ostrovsky equation, which arises as a model for the unidirectional propagation of small-amplitude, weakly nonlinear surface and internal gravity waves in a rotating fluid of finite depth. While the modulation of such waves with asymptotically small amplitudes of oscillation (the so-called Stokes waves) has been studied in several works, our goal is to understand the modulational dynamics of general amplitude wave trains. To this end, we first use Whitham's theory of modulations to derive a dispersionless system of quasilinear partial differential equations that is expected to model the slow evolution of the fundamental characteristics of a given wave train. In practice, the modulational stability or instability of a given wave train is considered to be determined by the hyperbolicity or ellipticity, respectively, of the resulting system of Whitham modulation equations. Using rigorous spectral perturbation theory we then study the spectral (linearized) stability problem for a given wave train solution of the Ostrovsky equation, directly connecting the hyperbolicity or ellipticity of the associated Whitham system to the rigorous spectral stability problem for the underlying wave. Specifically, we prove that strict hyperbolicity of the Whitham system implies spectral stability near the origin in the spectral plane, i.e. so-called spectral modulational stability, while ellipticity implies spectral instability of the underlying wave train.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Bhavna, M. A. Johnson, and A. K. Pandey. Modulational instability in the Ostrovsky equation and related models. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 56(6):7390–7416, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Barker, M

    B. Barker, M. A. Johnson, P. Noble, L. M. Rodrigues, and K. Zumbrun. Nonlinear modula- tional stability of periodic traveling-wave solutions of the generalized Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Phys. D , 258:11–46, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [2]

    Barker, M

    B. Barker, M. A. Johnson, P. Noble, L. M. Rodrigues, and K. Zumbrun. Stability of viscous St. Venant roll waves: from onset to infinite Froude number limit. J. Nonlinear Sci. , 27(1):285– 342, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    Baumg¨ artel.Analytic perturbation theory for matrices and operators, volume 15 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications

    H. Baumg¨ artel.Analytic perturbation theory for matrices and operators, volume 15 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications . Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1985

    work page 1985

  5. [4]

    E. Benilov. On the surface waves in a shallow channel with an uneven bottom. Stud Appl Math, 87:1–14, 1992

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    T. J. Bridges and A. Mielke. A proof of the Benjamin-Feir instability. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 133(2), 1995

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    J. C. Bronski, V. M. Hur, and M. A. Johnson. Modulational instability in equations of KdV type. Lecture Notes in Physics , 908, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Bruell and L

    G. Bruell and L. Pei. Existence, regularity and symmetry of periodic traveling waves for Gardner-Ostrovsky type equations. Monatsh. Math. , 202(4):685–711, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Choudhury, R

    R. Choudhury, R. I. Ivanov, and Y. Liu. Hamiltonian formulation, nonintegrability and local bifurcations for the Ostrovsky equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals, 34(2):544–550, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Doelman, B

    A. Doelman, B. Sandstede, A. Scheel, and G. Schneider. The dynamics of modulated wave trains. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 199(934):viii+105, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    G. A. El. Soliton gas in integrable dispersive hydrodynamics. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. , (11):Paper No. 114001, 69, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    G. A. El and M. A. Hoefer. Dispersive shock waves and modulation theory. Phys. D, 333:11–65, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    V. N. Galkin and Y. A. Stepanyants. On the existence of stationary solitary waves in a rotating fluid. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics , 55(6):939–943, 1991. 39

    1991

  6. [14]

    R. A. Gardner. On the structure of the spectra of periodic travelling waves. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 72(5):415–439, 1993

    1993

  7. [15]

    Geyer and D

    A. Geyer and D. E. Pelinovsky. Spectral stability of periodic waves in the generalized reduced Ostrovsky equation. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 107(7):1293–1314, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Gohberg, S

    I. Gohberg, S. Goldberg, and M. A. Kaashoek. Classes of linear operators. Vol. I , volume 49 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications . Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1990

    1990

  9. [17]

    Grimshaw and K

    R. Grimshaw and K. Helfrich. Long-time solutions of the Ostrovsky equation. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 121(1):71–88, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    Grimshaw, Y

    R. Grimshaw, Y. Stepanyants, and A. Alias. Formation of wave packets in the Ostrovsky equation for both normal and anomalous dispersion. Proc. A., 472(2185):20150416, 20, 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    Hakkaev, M

    S. Hakkaev, M. Stanislavova, and A. Stefanov. Transverse instability for periodic waves of KP-I and schr¨ odinger equations.Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 61(2), 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Hakkaev, M

    S. Hakkaev, M. Stanislavova, and A. Stefanov. Periodic traveling waves of the regularized short pulse and Ostrovsky equations: existence and stability. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 49(1):674–698, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    D. Henry. Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations , volume 840 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1981

    1981

  14. [22]

    Ishimura and T

    N. Ishimura and T. Mizumachi. Existence of periodic traveling wave solutions for the Ostrovsky equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. , 31(14):1646–1652, 2008

    2008

  15. [23]

    E. R. Johnson and D. E. Pelinovsky. Orbital stability of periodic waves in the class of reduced Ostrovsky equations. J. Differential Equations , 261(6):3268–3304, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Johnson and W

    M. Johnson and W. R. Perkins. Modulational Instability of Viscous Fluid Conduit Periodic Waves. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , (52):277–305, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    M. A. Johnson. Nonlinear stability of periodic traveling wave solutions of the generalized korteweg-de vries equation. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 41(5), 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    M. A. Johnson. Stability of small periodic waves in fractional kdv-type equations. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 45:5, 2013

    2013

  19. [27]

    M. A. Johnson, P. Noble, L. M. Rodrigues, and K. Zumbrun. Behavior of periodic solutions of viscous conservation laws under localized and nonlocalized perturbations. Invent. Math. , 197(1):115–213, 2014

    2014

  20. [28]

    C. K. R. T. Jones, R. Marangell, P. D. Miller, and R. G. Plaza. Spectral and modulational stability of periodic wavetrains for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. J. Differential Equa- tions, 257(12):4632–4703, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Kapitula and A

    T. Kapitula and A. Stefanov. A Hamiltonian-Krein (instability) index theory for solitary waves to KdV-like eigenvalue problems. Stud. Appl. Math. , 132(3):183–211, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    T. Kato. Perturbation theory for linear operators, volume Band 132 of Grundlehren der Math- ematischen Wissenschaften . Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, second edition, 1976. 40

    1976

  23. [31]

    Levandosky and Y

    S. Levandosky and Y. Liu. Stability of solitary waves of a generalized ostrovsky equation. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 38(3), 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    Levandosky and Y

    S. Levandosky and Y. Liu. Stability and weak rotation limit of solitary waves of the ostrovsky equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series B , 7(4):793–806, 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    Liu and V

    Y. Liu and V. Varlamov. Stability of solitary waves and weak rotation limit for the Ostrovsky equation. Journal of Differential Equations , 203(1):159–183, 2004

    2004

  26. [34]

    D. Lu, L. Liu, and L. Wu. Orbital stability of solitary waves for generalized Ostrovsky equation. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering , volume 136 LNEE, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    J. C. Luke. A perturbation method for nonlinear dispersive wave problems. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A , 292:403–412, 1966

    1966

  28. [36]

    M¨ oller and V

    M. M¨ oller and V. Pivovarchik. Spectral theory of operator pencils, Hermite-Biehler func- tions, and their applications , volume 246 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications . Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2015

    2015

  29. [37]

    Nivala and B

    M. Nivala and B. Deconinck. Periodic finite-genus solutions of the KdV equation are orbitally stable. Phys. D , 239(13):1147–1158, 2010

    2010

  30. [38]

    Obregon and Y

    M. Obregon and Y. A. Stepanyants. Oblique magneto-acoustic solitons in rotating plasma. Phys. Lett. A , 249(4):314–323, 1998

    1998

  31. [39]

    L. A. Ostrovsky. Nonlinear internal waves in a rotating ocean. Oceanology, 18:2, 1978

    1978

  32. [40]

    Posukhovskyi and A

    I. Posukhovskyi and A. Stefanov. On the ground states of the Ostrovskyi equation and their stability. Stud. Appl. Math. , 144(4):548–575, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics. IV. Analysis of operators . Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1978

    1978

  34. [42]

    Sandstede, A

    B. Sandstede, A. Scheel, G. Schneider, and H. Uecker. Diffusive mixing of periodic wave trains in reaction-diffusion systems. J. Differential Equations , 252(5):3541–3574, 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    Stanislavova and A

    M. Stanislavova and A. Stefanov. On the spectral problem Lu = λu′ and applications. Comm. Math. Phys. , 343(2):361–391, 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    Y. A. Stepanyants. Nonlinear Waves in a Rotating Ocean (The Ostrovsky Equation and Its Generalizations and Applications). Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics , 56(1):20–42, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    K. Tsugawa. Well-posedness and weak rotation limit for the Ostrovsky equation. Journal of Differential Equations, 247(12), 2009

    2009

  38. [46]

    A. J. Whitfield and E. R. Johnson. Whitham modulation theory for the Ostrovsky equation. Proc. A., 473(2197):20610709, 17, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    G. B. Whitham. A general approach to linear and non-linear dispersive waves using a La- grangian. J. Fluid Mech. , 22:273–283, 1965

    1965

  40. [48]

    G. B. Whitham. Linear and nonlinear waves . Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York-London-Sydney, 1974. Pure and Applied Mathematics. 41

    1974

  41. [49]

    W. Yan, Y. Li, J. Huang, and J. Duan. The Cauchy problem for the Ostrovsky equation with positive dispersion. NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. , 25(3):Paper No. 22, 37, 2018. 42

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.