Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Resurgence Analysis of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model at large charge

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the 3d NJL fixed point, with $q=Q/(2N)$ fixed, the scaling dimension is a small-$q$ convergent series and a large-$q$ transseries whose exponential corrections are $S^2$ worldline instantons.

desk verdict First systematic fermionic large-charge resurgence analysis for the NJL model, with a solid small-q convergent expansion; the claimed exponential correction is at best a Stokes discontinuity, not a real prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21631 v1 pith:WEFGTDOW submitted 2025-05-27 hep-th cond-mat.str-el

Jahmall Bersini , Simeon Hellerman , Domenico Orlando , Susanne Reffert This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-el
keywords largechargeexpansionNambu-Jona-Lasiniomodeldouble-scalinglimitresurgencetransseriesworldlineinstantonsconformalfieldtheoryzeta-functionregularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the three-dimensional Nambu–Jona–Lasinio model at its ultraviolet fixed point in a double-scaling limit: charge $Q$ and flavor number $N$ both go to infinity with the ratio $q=Q/(2N)$ held fixed. The authors claim that the conformal dimension of the lowest charged operator, $\Delta(Q)/(2N)$, is governed by two complementary expansions: a convergent power series in $q$ at small $q$, with radius $|q|<0.35(3)$, and an asymptotic series in inverse powers of $q$ at large $q$ whose coefficients grow like $(2n)!$. They then identify the exponentially small corrections that connect the two regimes, of the form $e^{-\alpha\sqrt{q}}$ with explicit prefactor and phase given in Eq (4.28), and argue that these corrections are worldline-instanton contributions from particles winding around great circles of the $S^2$ in the cylinder geometry. If true, the large-charge expansion of this fermionic CFT is a complete transseries with a geometric interpretation, matching the pattern previously found for the bosonic O(N) model.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the zeta-function-regularized one-loop grand potential, $S(\mu,\Phi_0)=-\beta N\,\zeta(-1/2)$ with the gap equation $\Phi_0\,\zeta(1/2)=0$, in which $\Phi_0$ is the Hubbard–Stratonovich condensate (the fermion gap) and $\mu$ the chemical potential. Around $\mu=1/(2r)$ the small-$q$ regime is reached by a trinomial expansion of the zeta function whose convergence region $\mathcal{C}=\{r|\tilde{\mu}|<1/4,\ r^2|\Phi_0^2+\tilde{\mu}^2|<1/4\}$ controls the radius of convergence. Around large $q$ the Mellin transform of the heat kernel with a Poisson resummation converts the $\ell$-sum into a sum over winding numbers $k$; the asymptotic expansion of Dawson's function, with the Stokes parameter fixed by reality of the heat kernel, produces both the factorial growth $(2n)!$ and the exponential corrections. The dimensionless constant $\kappa_0$ defined by $\kappa_0\tanh\kappa_0=1$ fixes the large-$q$ relation $\Phi_0=\mu\sqrt{\kappa_0^2-1}$ and appears in the exponential coefficient $\alpha=2\pi\sqrt{\kappa_0^{-1}-\kappa_0^{-3}}$. The geometric interpretation is provided by worldline instantons: geodesics on $S^2$ with action $S_I=(\pi k r)^2$ and fluctuation determinant $\cos(2\pi k\mu r)$ reproducing the nonperturbative terms.

What would settle it

The claim would be settled by evaluating the exact zeta function (2.15) numerically at fixed $q$ and comparing against the truncated transseries (perturbative terms plus the Eq (4.28) exponentials): a mismatch beyond estimated higher-order corrections, or an independent computation of $\Delta(Q)/(2N)$ that fails to reproduce the radius $|q|\approx0.35(3)$ and the $e^{-\alpha\sqrt{q}}$ corrections, would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that at the 3d NJL fixed point, in the double-scaling limit $q=Q/(2N)$ fixed, the scaling dimension admits a convergent small-$q$ expansion with radius of convergence $|q|\approx 0.35(3)$, whose leading singularity lies on the negative real axis with Darboux exponents $p=-1/2$ for the gap and $p=-3/2$ for the dimension, and a divergent asymptotic large-$q$ expansion whose coefficients grow like $(2n)!$. Using a Mellin-transform representation of the zeta-regulated determinant and a Poisson-resummed heat kernel, the paper extracts the nonperturbative part of the transseries: $\Delta(Q)/(2N)$ receives corrections of the form $-i (\kappa_0^2-1)^{1/4} q^{3/4} e^{-2\pi \sqrt{\kappa_0^{-1}-\kappa_0^{-3}}\, |k| \sqrt{q}} \, (2\pi \kappa_0^{9/4}\sqrt{|k|})^{-1} \left[\sqrt{\kappa_0^2-1}\,\cos(2\pi k\sqrt{q}/\kappa_0^{3/2}) + \sin(2\pi k\sqrt{q}/\kappa_0^{3/2})\right] + \ldots$, where $\kappa_0\approx 1.199678640257733\ldots$ is the positive solution of $\kappa_0\tanh\kappa_0=1$. These exponential corrections are the resurgence partners of the factorial divergence of the large-$q$ series, and the paper identifies their geometric origin: worldline instantons with action $S_I=(\pi k r)^2$, i.e. fermions whose worldlines wind $k$ times around geodesics of the sphere. The reality of the effective action fixes the Stokes parameter, removing the ambiguity that normally plagues asymptotic expansions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the zeta-function-regularized one-loop determinant $S(\mu,\Phi_0)=-\beta N\,\zeta(-1/2)$, together with the gap equation $\Phi_0\,\zeta(1/2)=0$, is the exact grand potential in the double-scaling limit at the NJL UV fixed point, and that requiring the heat kernel to be real uniquely fixes the Stokes parameter; if either premise fails, both the convergent small-$q$ series and the large-$q$ transseries would not describe the actual fixed point.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The small-$q$ expansion of $\Delta(Q)/(2N)$ is convergent rather than asymptotic, so the lowest-charge spectrum in that regime is determined by a finite-radius power series, with radius estimated as $|q|<0.35(3)$.
  • The large-$q$ expansion is asymptotic with coefficients growing like $(2n)!$, so optimal truncation occurs at about $\sqrt{q}$ terms and the remaining error is exponentially small.
  • The leading nonperturbative corrections take the explicit form $e^{-\alpha\sqrt{q}}$ with $\alpha=2\pi\sqrt{\kappa_0^{-1}-\kappa_0^{-3}}\,|k|$, phased by $\cos(2\pi k\sqrt{q}/\kappa_0^{3/2})$ and $\sin(2\pi k\sqrt{q}/\kappa_0^{3/2})$, making the large-charge spectrum a transseries rather than a plain divergent series.
  • The same exponential corrections are reproduced by a worldline-instanton calculation with action $S_I=(\pi k r)^2$ and fermion-fluctuation determinant $\cos(2\pi k\mu r)$, giving a geometric origin for the transseries.
  • The conjecture from the bosonic large-charge analysis, that nonperturbative corrections to gapped fixed-charge systems scale as $e^{-\alpha\sqrt{Q}}$, is confirmed for a fermionic model with a Cooper-pair condensate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open the detailed first-quantized action at fixed $\mu t/r$; a testable extension would be to construct the complexified saddle that reproduces the $\sin(2\pi k\mu r)$ term in Eq (4.20), which the paper notes is not explained by the simple real-geodesic fluctuation determinant.
  • Because the canonical ensemble simplifies the singularity structure of the small-$q$ series, the same simplification may occur at large $q$; writing the worldline path integral directly in fixed-charge variables could produce a cleaner instanton action and settle which of the competing worldline formulations is correct.
  • The methods should transfer to the Gross–Neveu model at large charge, whose large-$N$ phase is a Fermi surface with a BCS instability; a similar Poisson-resummed heat-kernel analysis would predict whether its transseries has the same $e^{-\alpha\sqrt{q}}$ form with a different gap equation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the three-dimensional Nambu–Jona–Lasinio model at its UV fixed point in the double-scaling limit Q,N→∞ with q=Q/(2N) fixed. The grand potential is computed from the zeta-function-regularized one-loop determinant on R×S^2, the gap equation is solved in both small-q and large-q regimes, and the scaling dimension Δ(Q)/(2N) is obtained from a Legendre transform. The authors claim that the small-q series is convergent with radius |q|<0.35(3), that the large-q series is asymptotic with (2n)! growth, and that the leading nonperturbative corrections take the explicit form of the transseries in Eq. (4.28), which they interpret geometrically as worldline instantons wrapping geodesics on S^2.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the paper would provide the first fermionic example of a full large-charge transseries with explicit exponential corrections, extending the bosonic O(N) analysis of [19] and supporting the conjecture that gapped fixed-charge systems have e^{-α√q} corrections. The computation is parameter-free in the sense that κ0 is fixed by the transcendental equation κ0 tanh(κ0)=1 and no data are fitted. The small-q convergence radius and the explicit form of the leading nonperturbative correction are concrete, falsifiable predictions. However, two load-bearing issues currently prevent the central results from being accepted as stated: an inconsistency in the leading large-q coefficient between Section 2 and Section 4, and the fact that Eq. (4.28) is purely imaginary despite being presented as a correction to a real observable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.23); Section 4, Eq. (4.19); Abstract Eq. (1.5)] The leading large-q coefficient of Δ(Q)/(2N) is stated in two incompatible forms. Eq. (2.23) and the abstract give (2/3)κ0^{3/2} q^{3/2} + (1/6)κ0^{1/2} q^{1/2} + …, while Eq. (4.19) gives (2/3)(q/κ0)^{3/2} + (1/6)(q/κ0)^{1/2} + …. These differ by a factor κ0^3 ≈ 1.727 in the leading term. Since the entire large-q expansion, the optimal truncation order, and the comparison with the worldline result depend on this coefficient, the contradiction must be resolved and the correct expression identified.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (4.28)] The central nonperturbative prediction is not a prediction for a real observable as written. Eq. (4.28) states a contribution to Δ(Q)/(2N) that is explicitly proportional to -i times a real combination of cos and sin, while Δ(Q)/(2N) is real. At most Eq. (4.28) can be the Stokes discontinuity of the transseries, or one of the two half-discontinuities entering the Dawson-function expansion (4.9). The text after Eq. (4.9) says that the reality condition fixes the Stokes parameter, but it never constructs the real physical combination from the k and -k contributions or from the two sides of the Stokes line. This is not cosmetic: taking the real part, taking a half-sum, or combining k and -k with different relative weights changes the numerical prefactor and the relative weight of the cos and sin terms. The comparisons in Section 5 and Appendix B are made against this imaginary expression, so the claimed exponential correction is not yet defined as a physical correction to the conformal dimension.
  3. [Section 5 and Appendix B] The geometric interpretation is incomplete for the full nonperturbative correction. The heat-kernel exponential contribution in Eq. (4.20) contains both kπr cos(2πkμr) and tμ sin(2πkμr) terms, but the worldline determinant computation in Appendix B.3 reproduces only the cos term through the factor cos(2πkμr) in Eq. (B.27). Section 5 explicitly states that the sin term is a two-loop correction that is not reproduced, that the detailed construction of the action and saddle is lacking, and footnote 3 says that omitted counterterms cannot be neglected in the physical limit at fixed μt/r. Therefore, the claim that the nonperturbative corrections are controlled by worldline instantons on S^2 geodesics is not established for the complete expression that enters Eq. (4.28).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.23)] The argument of the Bessel function in Eq. (4.23) is written as 2πrΦ0|k|r, which contains an extra factor of r compared with the natural dimensionless combination 2πrΦ0|k| used in Eq. (4.24) and in the exponent below it; please correct this typo.
  2. [Section 3.2, Figure 4] The quantities R1 and R2 in Figure 4 are used for Richardson transforms but are never defined; please define them in the caption or in the text.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract says the exponential corrections 'relate' the convergent small-q expansion to the asymptotic large-q behavior, but the paper does not exhibit a full transseries that connects the two regimes beyond the leading exponential correction; please clarify what relation is actually established.
  4. [Section 3.2] The small-q convergence radius is established only numerically through ratio tests, Richardson transforms, and Darboux analysis of the first twenty coefficients, not by a proof; the text should state this limitation explicitly in the summary of the claim.
  5. [Conclusion, Section 6] The concluding paragraph correctly acknowledges that the worldline interpretation is suggestive rather than derived; this is commendable, but it should be reflected in the abstract's phrasing, which currently states the geometric interpretation more definitively.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation is self-contained, with only minor non-load-bearing reliance on the authors' prior work.

full rationale

The paper's central results are derived from an explicit zeta-function-regulated one-loop determinant, S(μ, Φ0) = -βN ζ(-1/2), together with the gap equation Φ0 ζ(1/2) = 0. No parameter is fitted to the predicted quantity: the large-q saddle is fixed by the transcendental equation κ0 tanh(κ0) = 1, and all expansions follow from this input by Mellin transforms, Poisson resummation, and explicit analytic continuation of Dawson's function. The small-q convergent series is obtained by a direct trinomial expansion of the zeta function, and the radius of convergence is extracted numerically from the coefficients; this is an estimate, not a fitted prediction. The large-q transseries is likewise computed from the same determinant, with the nonperturbative terms arising from the exponentially small part of the Dawson-function expansion; the geometric worldline calculation in Appendix B re-derives the same heat-kernel transseries from the worldline path integral, providing a consistency check rather than a circular input. The self-citations [14,19] are contextual: the earlier work is cited for the existence of the fixed point and for comparison of results, but the present paper re-derives the relevant expansions independently. The only notable concern, namely that Eq. (4.28) is purely imaginary while Δ(Q)/(2N) is real, is a physical-interpretation and Stokes-summation ambiguity, not a circularity: it does not make the prediction equal to an input by construction, and no fitted parameter is being renamed as a prediction. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is derived from one-loop functional determinants; no free parameters are fitted to data (κ0 is fixed by κ0 tanh κ0=1) and no new entities are postulated. The burden is carried by the zeta-function scheme and the large-N saddle identification.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption State-operator correspondence and fixed-charge/large-N mapping Δ(Q)=rF(Q) with F obtained by Legendre transform of the grand potential.
    Section 1, Eq (1.1), and Section 2, Eqs (2.6)-(2.8). Standard CFT large-charge framework.
  • domain assumption Large-N saddle-point approximation: the grand potential is the value of the Hubbard-Stratonovich action at a homogeneous saddle, and fluctuations of the collective field are neglected.
    Section 2, Eqs (2.11)-(2.12). The paper works at leading order in 1/N.
  • domain assumption Zeta-function regularization defines the action as S=-βN ζ(-1/2) and the gap equation as Φ0 ζ(1/2)=0.
    Section 2, Eqs (2.16)-(2.17). The result depends on this scheme choice.
  • domain assumption Conformal coupling on S^2 gives the collective field a mass m=1/(2r), motivating expansion around μ=1/(2r).
    Section 3.1, first paragraph. This sets the small-q expansion point.
  • domain assumption Poisson resummation and the asymptotic expansion of Dawson's function with the Stokes parameter fixed by reality of the effective action give a complete transseries for the heat kernel.
    Section 4, Eqs (4.5)-(4.9) and footnote 2. The nonperturbative terms follow from this choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resurgence Analysis of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model at large charge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WEFGTDOW

@misc{pith2026250521631,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resurgence Analysis of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model at large charge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WEFGTDOW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21631}
}
abstract

We study the fixed point of the three-dimensional NJL model in a double-scaling limit where both the charge $Q$ and the number of fermion flavors $N$ become large with a fixed ratio $q=Q/(2N)$. While a similar analysis has been performed for the bosonic O(N) model, fermionic models pose new challenges. In this work, we systematically explore the CFT spectrum in both the large and small $q$ limits beyond the first few orders, and perform a resurgence analysis. Through this approach, we identify the exponential corrections that relate the convergent small-$q$ expansion to the asymptotic large-$q$ behavior. Our results are suggestive of a geometric interpretation of these results in terms of the worldline of particles moving along the geodesics on the cylinder.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Hellerman and D

    S. Hellerman and D. Orlando.Large R-charge EFT correlators in N=2 SQCD(Mar. 2021). arXiv: 2103.05642 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [14]

    Dondi et al

    N. Dondi et al. Fermionic CFTs at large charge and large N . JHEP 08 (2023), p. 180. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2023)180. arXiv: 2211.15318 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [1]

    Hellerman, D

    S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and M. Watanabe. On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge. JHEP 12 (2015), p. 071. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2015)071 . arXiv: 1505.01537 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  4. [2]

    Alvarez-Gaume, D

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert. Selected topics in the large quantum number expansion. Phys. Rept. 933 (2021), p. 2180. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.08.001. arXiv: 2008.03308 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [3]

    Alvarez-Gaume, D

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert.Large charge at large N. JHEP 12 (2019), p. 142. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)142. arXiv: 1909.02571 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [4]

    Giombi and J

    S. Giombi and J. Hyman. On the large charge sector in the critical O(N) model at large N. JHEP 09 (2021), p. 184. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2021)184. arXiv: 2011.11622 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [5]

    N. A. Dondi and G. Sberveglieri. NLO in the large charge sector of the critical O(N) model at large N. JHEP 02 (2025), p. 005. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)005 . arXiv: 2409.06781 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [6]

    In particular, the free bosonic and fermionic path integrals are normalized to 1√ 4πt and unity, respectively

    We adopt the standard worldline normalization [30, 39]. In particular, the free bosonic and fermionic path integrals are normalized to 1√ 4πt and unity, respectively. 28

    work page

Show all 41 references
  1. [7]

    Badel, G

    G. Badel, G. Cuomo, A. Monin, and R. Rattazzi.The Epsilon Expansion Meets Semiclassics. JHEP 11 (2019), p. 110. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2019)110. arXiv: 1909.01269 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Arias-Tamargo, D

    G. Arias-Tamargo, D. Rodriguez-Gomez, and J. G. Russo. The large charge limit of scalar field theories and the Wilson-Fisher fixed point at ϵ = 0. JHEP 10 (2019), p. 201. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2019)201. arXiv: 1908.11347 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Badel, G

    G. Badel, G. Cuomo, A. Monin, and R. Rattazzi. Feynman diagrams and the large charge expansion in 3− ε dimensions. Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020), p. 135202. DOI: 10 . 1016 / j . physletb.2020.135202. arXiv: 1911.08505 [hep-th]

    2020

  4. [10]

    Antipin, J

    O. Antipin, J. Bersini, F . Sannino, Z.-W. Wang, and C. Zhang.Charging the O(N) model. Phys. Rev. D 102.4 (2020), p. 045011. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.045011. arXiv: 2003.13121 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Sharon and M

    A. Sharon and M. Watanabe.Transition of LargeR-Charge Operators on a Conformal Manifold. JHEP 01 (2021), p. 068. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2021)068. arXiv: 2008.01106 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Antipin, J

    O. Antipin, J. Bersini, and P . Panopoulos.Yukawa interactions at large charge. JHEP 10 (2022), p. 183. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2022)183. arXiv: 2208.05839 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Antipin, J

    O. Antipin, J. Bersini, P . Panopoulos, F . Sannino, and Z.-W. Wang. Infinite order results for charged sectors of the Standard Model. JHEP 02 (2024), p. 168. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2024)

    2024 doi

  8. [15]

    Watanabe

    M. Watanabe. Accessing large global charge via the ϵ-expansion. JHEP 04 (2021), p. 264. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)264. arXiv: 1909.01337 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Hellerman, S

    S. Hellerman, S. Maeda, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and M. Watanabe. Universal correlation functions in rank 1 SCFTs. JHEP 12 (2019), p. 047. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)047. arXiv: 1804.01535 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Grassi, Z

    A. Grassi, Z. Komargodski, and L. Tizzano.Extremal correlators and random matrix theory. JHEP 04 (2021), p. 214. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)214. arXiv: 1908.10306 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Hellerman

    S. Hellerman. On the exponentially small corrections to𝒩 = 2 superconformal correlators at large R-charge (Mar. 2021). arXiv: 2103.09312 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Antipin, J

    O. Antipin, J. Bersini, F . Sannino, and M. Torres.The analytic structure of the fixed charge expansion. JHEP 06 (2022), p. 041. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2022)041 . arXiv: 2202.13165 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dondi, I

    N. Dondi, I. Kalogerakis, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert.Resurgence of the large-charge expansion. JHEP 05 (2021), p. 035. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)035. arXiv: 2102.12488 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Pauli.On the conservation of the lepton charge

    W. Pauli.On the conservation of the lepton charge. Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 6.1 (1957), pp. 204–215. 29

    1957

  15. [23]

    Dondi, I

    N. Dondi, I. Kalogerakis, R. Moser, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert.Spinning correlators in large- charge CFTs. Nucl. Phys. B 983 (2022), p. 115928. DOI: 10 . 1016 / j . nuclphysb . 2022 . 115928. arXiv: 2203.12624 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ebert, T

    D. Ebert, T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and V. C. Zhukovsky. Competition and duality correspondence between chiral and superconducting channels in ( 2+1 )-dimensional four- fermion models with fermion number and chiral chemical potentials . Phys. Rev. D 93.10 (2016), p. 10502...

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gürsey.Relation of charge independence and baryon conservation to Pauli’s transforma- tion

    F . Gürsey.Relation of charge independence and baryon conservation to Pauli’s transforma- tion. Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 7.3 (1958), pp. 411–415

    1958

  18. [26]

    Dorigoni and Y

    D. Dorigoni and Y . Hatsuda.Resurgence of the Cusp Anomalous Dimension. JHEP 09 (2015), p. 138. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)138. arXiv: 1506.03763 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. E. Fisher. Critical Point Phenomena — The Role of Series Expansions. Rocky Mt.J.Math. 4 (1974), p. 181. DOI: 10.1216/RMJ-1974-4-2-181

    1974 doi

  20. [28]

    Dorigoni

    D. Dorigoni. An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus. Annals Phys. 409 (2019), p. 167914. DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2019.167914. arXiv: 1411.3585 [hep-th]

    2019

  21. [29]

    J. Ecalle. Les fonctions résurgentes. Tome I / II et III, Publications Mathématiques d’Orsay 81, volumes 5 and 6, France (1981-1985)

    1981

  22. [30]

    Schubert

    C. Schubert. Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism. Phys. Rept. 355 (2001), pp. 73–234. DOI: 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00013-8. arXiv: hep-th/0101036

    2001 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Aniceto, G

    I. Aniceto, G. Basar, and R. Schiappa.A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymp- totics. Phys. Rept. 809 (2019), pp. 1–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2019.02.003 . arXiv: 1802.10441 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    M. J. Strassler.Field theory without Feynman diagrams: One loop effective actions. Nucl. Phys. B 385 (1992), pp. 145–184. DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90098-V. arXiv: hep-ph/9205205

    1992 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bastianelli and P

    F . Bastianelli and P . van Nieuwenhuizen.Path integrals and anomalies in curved space. Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Sept. 2006. ISBN: 978-0-511-21772-2, 978-0-521-12050-0, 978-0-521-84761-2. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511535031

    2006 doi

  26. [34]

    D’Hoker and D

    E. D’Hoker and D. G. Gagne.Worldline path integrals for fermions with general couplings. Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996), pp. 297–312. DOI: 10 . 1016 / 0550 - 3213(96 ) 00126 - 5. arXiv: hep-th/9512080

    1996 arXiv

  27. [35]

    D’Hoker and D

    E. D’Hoker and D. G. Gagne. Worldline path integrals for fermions with scalar, pseudoscalar and vector couplings. Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996), pp. 272–296. DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(96) 00125-3. arXiv: hep-th/9508131

    1996 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bastianelli, O

    F . Bastianelli, O. Corradini, and A. Zirotti.dimensional regularization for N=1 supersymmetric sigma models and the worldline formalism . Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003), p. 104009. DOI: 10. 1103/PhysRevD.67.104009. arXiv: hep-th/0211134

    2003 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. G. C. McKeon and C. Schubert. A New approach to axial vector model calculations . Phys. Lett. B 440 (1998), pp. 101–107. DOI: 10 . 1016 / S0370 - 2693(98 ) 01074 - 0. arXiv: hep-th/9807072

    1998 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Demulder, D

    S. Demulder, D. Dorigoni, and D. C. Thompson.Resurgence in η-deformed Principal Chiral Models. JHEP 07 (2016), p. 088. DOI: 10 . 1007 / JHEP07(2016 ) 088. arXiv: 1604 . 07851 [hep-th]. 30

    2016

  31. [39]

    Bastianelli, O

    F . Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P . Edwards, D. G. C. McKeon, and C. Schubert.Unified world- line treatment of Yukawa and axial couplings . JHEP 11 (2024), p. 152. DOI: 10 . 1007 / JHEP11(2024)152. arXiv: 2406.19988 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Reuter, M

    M. Reuter, M. G. Schmidt, and C. Schubert. Constant external fields in gauge theory and the spin 0, 1/2, 1 path integrals. Annals Phys. 259 (1997), pp. 313–365. DOI: 10.1006/aphy. 1997.5716. arXiv: hep-th/9610191. 31

    1997

  33. [168]

    arXiv: 2312.12963 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.