Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Neutron Magic Numbers in $sd$ Shell from Nuclear Charge Radii within Neutron-Proton Correction around the Fermi Surface

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A neutron-proton correction near the Fermi surface strengthens the charge-radius signature of shell closures at N=8, 20, and 28 in light nuclei.

desk verdict A useful systematic extension of the authors' charge-radius ansatz to the sd shell, but the headline claim that the correction enhances N=8, 20, 28 shell closures is largely built into the functional form of the correction term. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22412 v2 pith:IDCSF3WS submitted 2025-05-28 nucl-th

Yu-Ting Rong , Ping-Mo Liu , Dan Yang , Rong An This is my paper
classification nucl-th
keywords chargeradiusmagicnumbersneutron-protonpairingrelativisticHartree-BogoliubovsdshellclosureN=14subshellN=20islandofinversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a simple correction term, representing neutron-proton correlations among quasiparticle states near the Fermi surface, makes nuclear charge radii into sharper fingerprints of shell closures. Applied to even-even O, Ne, Mg, Si, and Ar isotopes within a relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model, the term produces sudden upward steps in the radius chains at neutron numbers $N=8$, 20, and 28, which the authors interpret as enhancement of the corresponding shell closures. The same correction resolves a known failure at $N=14$ in the Mg chain: BCS pairing overestimates the shell effect, while the Bogoliubov treatment, which creates fractional proton occupations near the Fermi surface, matches the measured $^{26}$Mg radius. The correction improves agreement with 24 measured radii when meson-exchange effective interactions (NL3, PK1) are used, but not for density-dependent interactions (DD-ME2, DD-PC1), indicating the effect is not universal across functionals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified rms charge-radius formula Eq. (6), $r_{\rm ch}^2 = \langle r_p^2 \rangle + 0.7056\ {\rm fm}^2 + \frac{a_0}{\sqrt{A}}\Delta D\ {\rm fm}^2 + \frac{\delta}{\sqrt{A}}\ {\rm fm}^2$, where $\Delta D = |D_n - D_p|$ measures neutron-proton correlations around the Fermi surface through $D_{n,p} = \sum_{k>0} u_k v_k$ summed over quasiparticle levels with $|E_k - \lambda| < 20$ MeV. The term converts the non-integer occupation of proton and neutron quasiparticle orbitals into a radius shift, and it is this $\Delta D$ that injects a kink into the charge-radius chain whenever a shell closure rearranges the Fermi-surface occupations. The correction is applied on top of the multidimensionally-constrained relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model restricted to axial/reflection symmetry (only $\beta_{20}$), using a separable finite-range pairing force with strength $G = 728$ MeV fm$^3$ and range $a = 0.644$ fm, and tested with four effective interactions (PK1, NL3, DD-ME2, DD-PC1) to gauge parameter dependence.

What would settle it

Refit the two constants $a_0$ and $\delta$ using the 24 measured radii of the O–Ar chains (or a subset excluding the magic nuclei) and recompute the radii: if the sharp kinks at $N=8$, 20, and 28 disappear or shift when the constants are determined from non-magic nuclei only, the claimed shell-closure enhancement is an artifact of the global fit rather than a physical signal. Alternatively, measure charge radii for neutron-rich Ne or Mg isotopes beyond $N=20$ (e.g., $^{34}$Mg or $^{34-36}$Ne): the RHB* model predicts a specific kink pattern there, and disagreement would falsify the ansatz's predictive power.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the modified charge-radius formula Eq. (6), with the neutron-proton correlation term $\Delta D = |D_n - D_p|$ constructed from quasiparticle occupations around the Fermi surface, turns charge-radii evolution in the $sd$ shell into a clear signal of shell structure. For the five isotopic chains with proton numbers $Z = 8, 10, 12, 14, 18$, the correction suddenly strengthens the charge radii at $N = 8$, 20, and 28, and the authors read this as an enhancement of the shell closure at those neutron numbers. In the Mg isotopes, the way pairing is treated determines the $N=14$ signal: BCS overestimates the shell effect, whereas the Bogoliubov transformation yields fractional proton occupations near the Fermi surface and reproduces the measured $^{26}$Mg radius. The authors further report that the correction improves the description of 24 measured charge radii when meson-exchange effective interactions (NL3, PK1) are used, but does not significantly help the density-dependent interactions (DD-ME2, DD-PC1).

Load-bearing premise

The correction term in Eq. (6) is applied with the constants $a_0 = 0.561$ and $\delta = 0.355$ taken from a global fit in Ref. [62], so the whole analysis assumes these constants are transferable to $sd$-shell nuclei and that $\Delta D$ really captures physical neutron-proton pairing; if the constants are not universal, or if deformation and beyond-mean-field effects are essential (the model returns spherical ground states even for $^{32}$Mg), the inferred shell-closure enhancement may be an artifact of the ansatz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the correction is physical, charge-radius kinks at $N=8$, 20, and 28 in the O–Ar chains can serve as a relatively inexpensive experimental signature of shell closures in neutron-rich nuclei.
  • The $N=14$ charge radius in the Mg isotopes becomes a diagnostic for how pairing is treated: only the Bogoliubov treatment with fractional proton occupations near the Fermi surface matches the measured value, indicating BCS-type approximations are inadequate for radii in this region.
  • Because the correction improves meson-exchange effective interactions but not density-dependent ones, the work implies that meson-exchange covariant functionals are missing an isovector surface term that density-dependent functionals already effectively contain.
  • Applying the same correction to heavier isotopic chains, which the authors state is in progress, should reveal whether additional or shifted shell closures appear in regions with new magic numbers.
  • The results support the general statement that neutron-proton correlation near the Fermi surface leaves a measurable imprint on the nuclear charge radius, not just like-particle pairing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct refit of the constants $a_0$ and $\delta$ from the 24 $sd$-shell radii alone would test whether the $N=8$, 20, and 28 kinks are driven by the chosen global fit or by shell structure itself; large changes in the constants would weaken the physical interpretation.
  • Because the unprojected model gives a spherical ground state for $^{32}$Mg while the measured radius is better reproduced with the correction, angular-momentum projected RHB* calculations could show whether the $N=20$ kink survives when deformation is restored.
  • The failure of the correction for density-dependent interactions suggests the microscopic content may be an effective isovector surface term rather than literal neutron-proton pairing; comparing with ab initio charge radii for $^{24-32}$Mg would decide which interpretation is more natural.
  • A systematic scan of the same $\Delta D$ term across heavier mass regions (for example around $N=50$ or $N=82$) would show whether the ansatz predicts spurious kinks at non-magic neutron numbers, constraining how widely the formula can be used.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes ground-state charge radii for even-even O, Ne, Mg, Si, and Ar isotopes using the multidimensionally-constrained relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model with four effective interactions (DD-ME2, DD-PC1, NL3, PK1). It augments the standard charge-radius formula with a correction term, Eq. (6), built from the absolute difference of neutron and proton pairing traces defined in Eq. (7), with constants taken from a previous global fit. The authors claim that this 'neutron-proton correction around the Fermi surface' produces sudden enhancements of charge radii at N=8, 20, and 28, thereby reinforcing shell closures at these neutron numbers, and that for Mg isotopes the Bogoliubov treatment of pairing is more consistent with the measured N=14 radius than BCS. They quantify the overall agreement with 24 measured radii through chi-square and rms deviations in Table 1.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would offer a simple phenomenological route to identify shell closures in the sd shell from charge radii, and it would pinpoint a specific deficiency of BCS pairing in neutron-rich Mg isotopes. The work has concrete strengths: four effective interactions are compared, the BCS-versus-Bogoliubov comparison for the Mg chain in Fig. 2 is instructive, and the tabulated deviations in Table 1 give a transparent measure of global performance. However, the central physical interpretation is not supported by the computed quantity: Eq. (7) contains separate like-particle pairing traces, not a neutron-proton mixed pairing amplitude, and the correction term in Eq. (6) is positive-definite with constants calibrated on the same type of data, so the appearance of kinks at magic numbers is partially built into the ansatz rather than emerging from a physically independent neutron-proton pairing effect.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (7)] The quantities D_n and D_p are defined as sums of u_k v_k over neutron and proton quasiparticle states separately. These are like-particle pairing traces; they contain no neutron-proton anomalous density or mixed isospin amplitude. The paper repeatedly refers to 'neutron-proton pairing correlations around the Fermi surface' and claims that these correlations 'lead to a sudden strengthening' of charge radii. That causal statement is not supported by the calculation. Either a genuine neutron-proton pairing observable must be computed, or the terminology and all associated claims must be revised to describe a difference of like-particle pairing strengths.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (6)] The constants a0 = 0.561 and delta = 0.355 are taken unchanged from the global fit of Ref. [62], which was itself fit to charge-radii data. The correction term is therefore not an independent prediction; its magnitude is calibrated on the same class of observables that the paper then compares with experiment. The manuscript provides no out-of-sample test, no refit restricted to the sd shell, and no sensitivity analysis for these constants. This is load-bearing for the claim that the correction 'enhances' shell closures, because the size of the kinks depends directly on the pre-fitted values.
  3. [Sec. 3, Fig. 1] The central assertion of sudden strengthening at N=8, 20, and 28 is based on visual inspection of kinks in Fig. 1, without any quantitative measure such as a second difference of r_ch, a slope change, or an uncertainty estimate. Since the correction term in Eq. (6) is positive and depends on |D_n - D_p|, it will generically tend to raise radii more in open-shell nuclei than in doubly magic or closed-neutron-shell nuclei, so visual kinks are not by themselves evidence of a physical shell-closure enhancement. A quantitative definition of 'kink' and a demonstration that the pattern is not an artifact of the functional form are needed.
  4. [Sec. 3, Table 1] Table 1 shows that the RHB* correction improves the average deviation for the meson-exchange interactions NL3 and PK1, but the rms deviation Δ increases for both density-dependent interactions DD-ME2 and DD-PC1, and the chi-square for DD-PC1 worsens substantially (952.21 to 1083.08). This interaction dependence is acknowledged in the text but not explained. Because the claimed universal enhancement of shell closures is expected to be interaction-independent, the paper should either identify why density-dependent interactions behave differently or restrict the claim to meson-exchange functionals.
  5. [Sec. 3, Mg isotopes and N=20] The manuscript notes that the RHB model yields spherical ground states for 32Mg for all four forces, despite the well-established deformation in the island of inversion, and that only beyond-mean-field effects restore deformation. Nevertheless, the paper uses the RHB* charge radius of 32Mg as evidence for an N=20 shell-closure effect. If the mean-field ground state is qualitatively wrong in this region, the inferred enhancement at N=20 cannot be interpreted as physical without a deformation or projection treatment. This should be addressed before any conclusion about N=20 magicity is drawn.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The phrase 'A ansatz' should read 'An ansatz', and 'Acnowledgements' in the back matter is a typo for 'Acknowledgements'.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (9)] The symbol N is used both for the neutron number and for the number of data points in the definition of the average deviation; this is confusing and should be relabeled, for example as N_data.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption states that the gray band represents N=14 and 20, but the text also discusses N=16 as a relevant magic number; the figure shading and caption should be clarified so that all discussed shell closures are identified consistently.
  4. [Sec. 2, Eq. (6)] The notation 'r_ch^2 = <r_p^2> + ...' is dimensionally consistent, but the paper should state explicitly that the second term 0.7056 fm^2 is the standard proton finite-size correction and cite the source consistently with Eq. (6) of Ref. [62].

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The magic-number enhancement is partly built into the same-group ansatz and pre-fitted constants of Eq. (6), while the RHB-computed ΔD and honest interaction-dependent comparisons retain independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2, Eq. (6); Section 3, Table 1]
    "The modified root-mean-square (rms) charge radii r_ch is recalled as follows [62]: r2_ch = ⟨r2_p⟩ + 0.7056 fm2 + a0/√A ΔD fm2 + δ/√A fm2. ... The values of a0 = 0.561 and δ = 0.355(0.000) for odd-odd (even-even, odd-even, and even-odd) nuclei are the same as those shown in Ref. [62]."

    The central correction term is not derived in this paper; it is imported from Ref. [62], a prior charge-radius study by the same group, with the constants a0 and δ already fixed to global charge-radius data. When Table 1 then reports improved χ² for 24 even-even O–Ar radii, the comparison is not a fully out-of-sample test of the correction’s magnitude: the scale and sign of the correction are inherited from a same-group fit to charge radii. The kink positions still come from the model-computed ΔD, so this is load-bearing self-citation rather than total circularity.

  2. renaming known result [Section 2, Eq. (7); Abstract; Section 3.1]
    "The term ΔD = |D_n − D_p| is employed to measure the neutron-proton correlations around Fermi surface, which reads: D_{n,p} = Σ_{k>0} u_{n,p}_k v_{n,p}_k. ... Our results show that the neutron-proton pairing corrections around the Fermi surface lead to a sudden strengthening of the charge radii of these isotopic chains at N=8, 20 and 28, reflecting the fact that this correction enhances the shell closure across N=8, 20 and 28."

    The quantity named “neutron-proton correlation” is a difference of separate neutron and proton like-particle pairing traces; it contains no mixed neutron-proton anomalous density, so the physical label is an interpretation. Moreover, the correction enters with a fixed positive sign and its u v factors vanish for closed-shell integer occupations; any positive term of this form preferentially raises open-shell radii and sharpens charge-radius kinks at magic numbers. The claimed “sudden strengthening” is thus largely a restatement of how the ansatz was constructed, although the RHB-computed D_n, D_p values are model outputs rather than fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper explicitly calls the correction an ansatz and does not re-fit it to the 24 selected nuclei; it also reports honestly that the correction worsens DD-PC1 (Table 1), which is an independent, falsifiable check. The RHB-computed ΔD, including the BCS-versus-RHB difference at 26Mg, is a genuine model result and not a parameterization of the kinks. However, the absolute scale of the correction is inherited from the same group’s global charge-radius fit [62], and the positive |D_n − D_p| functional form is constructed so that closed-shell (small-pairing) configurations receive the smallest addition, making part of the claimed magic-number enhancement a built-in property of the input. The central claim therefore has independent content but is partially circular, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim depends on the charge-radius ansatz of Eq. (6) with constants fitted in prior work by the same group, the model choice of MDC-RHB with four effective interactions and a separable pairing force, and the interpretation of Delta D as a neutron-proton pairing correction. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • a0 = 0.561
    Coefficient of the neutron-proton correction term in Eq. (6), taken from the global fit in Ref. [62].
  • delta = 0.355 (odd-odd), 0 (others)
    Constant term in Eq. (6), fitted in Ref. [62].
  • Quasiparticle energy cutoff = 20 MeV
    Cutoff |E_k - lambda| < 20 MeV used in Eq. (7) to define D_n,p; chosen by hand.
  • Pairing strength G = 728 MeV fm^3
    Strength of the separable finite-range pairing force from Ref. [61].
  • Pairing range a = 0.644 fm
    Effective range of the separable pairing force from Ref. [61].
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The MDC-RHB model with the four effective interactions (PK1, NL3, DD-ME2, DD-PC1) provides a valid mean-field description of these light nuclei.
    Used throughout Sec. 3; the model is a standard relativistic mean-field framework but has known limitations for light nuclei (e.g., spherical ground state for 32Mg).
  • ad hoc to paper The charge radius formula Eq. (6), including the proton finite-size correction, the a0/sqrt(A) Delta D term, and the delta/sqrt(A) term, is valid for these nuclei.
    This is the central ansatz, introduced in Ref. [62] and adopted here without re-derivation or refitting.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantity D_n,p defined in Eq. (7) with a 20 MeV cutoff represents neutron-proton pairing correlations around the Fermi surface.
    The physical interpretation is asserted, not derived; D_n,p is a difference of neutron and proton pairing amplitudes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutron Magic Numbers in $sd$ Shell from Nuclear Charge Radii within Neutron-Proton Correction around the Fermi Surface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDCSF3WS

@misc{pith2026250522412,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutron Magic Numbers in $sd$ Shell from Nuclear Charge Radii within Neutron-Proton Correction around the Fermi Surface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDCSF3WS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22412}
}
abstract

Charge radii are sensitive indicators to identify the nuclear structure phenomena throughout the whole nuclide chart. In particular, the shrunken trend of changes of charge radii along a long isotopic chain is intimately associated with the shell quenching effect. In this work, the systematic evolution of charge radii along the proton numbers $Z=8$, $10$, $12$, $14$, $18$ isotopes is investigated by a relativistic Hartree Bogoliubov model. A ansatz about neutron-proton correlation around Fermi surface is considered for describing the abnormal behavior of nuclear charge radii. Our results show that the neutron-proton pairing corrections around the Fermi surface lead to a sudden strengthening of the charge radii of these isotopic chains at $N=8$, 20 and 28, reflecting the fact that this correction enhances the shell closure across $N=8$, 20 and 28. The reproduction of the $N=14$ charge radius in the Mg isotopes is affected by the way in which pairing correlations are handled, with BCS theory overestimating the shell effect of $N=14$, and the Bogoliubov quasiparticle transformation suggests a stronger pairing correlation near the proton Fermi surface, which is more consistent with experimental results. An analysis of the deviations from the theoretical and available experimental data for the charge radii of the 24 selected even-even nuclei shows that the neutron-proton pairing correction around the Fermi surface has an improved effect on the calculation of the charge {radii} using the meson-exchange effective interactions, but it does not help to significantly improve the results calculated by the density-dependent effective interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22412 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Color online) Charge radii of O, Ne, Mg, Si, and Ar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Color online) Charge radii for Mg isotopes with (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Color online) Single-particle levels of ground state of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Color online) ∆rch as a function of proton number for N = 14 isotones calculated with (a) NL3 and (b) PK1 effective interactions. The corresponding experimental data are taken from Refs. [3, 22] (solid square). The empirical values with rch = r0A 1/3 (r0 = 1.2 fm) are…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    R. An, X. Jiang, N. Tang, L.-G. Cao, F.-S. Zhang, Improved description of nuclear charge radii: Global trends beyondn=28 shell closure, Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) 064302

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    M. Wang, W. Huang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, S. Naimi, The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references, Chin. Phys. C 45 (3) (2021) 030003

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    Pritychenko, M

    B. Pritychenko, M. Birch, B. Singh, M. Horoi, Tables ofE2 transition probabilities from the first 2 + states in even-even nuclei, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 107 (2016) 1 – 139

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    Angeli, K

    I. Angeli, K. Marinova, Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99 (1) (2013) 69 – 95

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Angeli, K

    I. Angeli, K. Marinova, Nuclear charge radii as signature for structural changes, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 724 (1) (2016) 012032

    work page 2016

  6. [5]

    Bagchi, R

    S. Bagchi, R. Kanungo, W. Horiuchi, G. Hagen, T. Morris, S. Stroberg, T. Suzuki, F. Ameil, J. Atkinson, Y . Ayyad, D. Cortina-Gil, I. Dillmann, A. Estrad ´e, A. Evdokimov, F. Farinon, H. Geissel, G. Guastalla, R. Janik, S. Kaur, R. Kn ¨obel, J. Kurcewicz, Y . Litvinov, M. Marta, M. Mostazo, I. Mukha, C. Nociforo, H. Ong, S. Pietri, A. Prochazka, C. Scheid...

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    S. Kaur, R. Kanungo, W. Horiuchi, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, B. S. Hu, T. Miyagi, T. Suzuki, F. Ameil, J. Atkinson, Y . Ayyad, S. Bagchi, D. Cortina-Gil, I. Dillmann, A. Estrad ´e, A. Evdokimov, F. Farinon, H. Geissel, G. Guastalla, R. Janik, R. Kn¨obel, J. Kurcewicz, Y . A. Litvinov, M. Marta, M. Mostazo, I. Mukha, C. Nociforo, H. J. Ong, T. Otsuka, S. Pietri...

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    D ´ıaz Fern´andez, H

    P. D ´ıaz Fern´andez, H. Alvarez-Pol, R. Crespo, E. Cravo, L. Atar, A. Deltuva, T. Aumann, V . Avdeichikov, S. Beceiro-Novo, D. Bemmerer, J. Benlliure, C. A. Bertulani, J. M. Boillos, K. Boretzky, M. J. G. Borge, M. Caama ˜no, P. Cabanelas, C. Caesar, E. Casarejos, W. Catford, J. Cederk ¨all, M. Chartier, L. V . Chulkov, D. Cortina-Gil, U. Datta Pramanik,...

    work page 2018

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    Sorlin, M.-G

    O. Sorlin, M.-G. Porquet, Nuclear magic numbers: New features far from stability, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61 (2) (2008) 602–673

    2008

  2. [9]

    X. Yang, S. Wang, S. Wilkins, R. G. Ruiz, Laser spectroscopy for the study of exotic nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129 (2023) 104005

    2023

  3. [10]

    Y . Ye, X. Yang, H. Sakurai, B. Hu, Physics of exotic nuclei, Nature Reviews Physics 7 (2025) 21

    2025

  4. [11]

    Thirolf, B

    P. Thirolf, B. Pritychenko, B. Brown, P. Cottle, M. Chromik, T. Glasmacher, G. Hackman, R. Ibbotson, K. Kemper, T. Otsuka, L. Riley, H. Scheit, Spectroscopy of the 2 + 1 state in 22O and shell structure near the neutron drip line, Phys, Lett. B 485 (1) (2000) 16–22

    2000

  5. [12]

    Stanoiu, F

    M. Stanoiu, F. Azaiez, Z. Dombr ´adi, O. Sorlin, B. A. Brown, M. Belleguic, D. Sohler, M. G. Saint Laurent, M. J. Lopez- Jimenez, Y . E. Penionzhkevich, G. Sletten, N. L. Achouri, J. C. Ang´elique, F. Becker, C. Borcea, C. Bourgeois, A. Bracco, J. M. Daugas, Z. Dlouh ´y, C. Do...

    2004

  6. [13]

    Becheva, Y

    E. Becheva, Y . Blumenfeld, E. Khan, D. Beaumel, J. M. Daugas, F. Delaunay, C.-E. Demonchy, A. Drouart, M. Fallot, A. Gillibert, L. Giot, M. Grasso, N. Keeley, K. W. Kemper, D. T. Khoa, V . Lapoux, V . Lima, A. Musumarra, L. Nalpas, E. C. Pollacco, O. Roig, P. Roussel-Chomaz, ...

    2006

  7. [14]

    Ozawa, T

    A. Ozawa, T. Kobayashi, T. Suzuki, K. Yoshida, I. Tanihata, New magic number,N=16, near the neutron drip line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5493–5495

    2000

  8. [15]

    Kanungo, I

    R. Kanungo, I. Tanihata, A. Ozawa, Observation of new neutron and proton magic numbers, Phys. Lett. B 528 (1) (2002) 58–64

    2002

  9. [16]

    Otsuka, R

    T. Otsuka, R. Fujimoto, Y . Utsuno, B. A. Brown, M. Honma, T. Mizusaki, Magic numbers in exotic nuclei and spin-isospin properties of theNNinteraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 8 082502

    2001

  10. [17]

    Hoffman, T

    C. Hoffman, T. Baumann, D. Bazin, J. Brown, G. Christian, D. Denby, P. DeYoung, J. Finck, N. Frank, J. Hinnefeld, S. Mosby, W. Peters, W. Rogers, A. Schiller, A. Spyrou, M. Scott, S. Tabor, M. Thoennessen, P. V oss, Evidence for a doubly magic 24O, Phys. Lett. B 672 (1) (2009) 17–21

    2009

  11. [18]

    Kanungo, C

    R. Kanungo, C. Nociforo, A. Prochazka, T. Aumann, D. Boutin, D. Cortina-Gil, B. Davids, M. Diakaki, F. Farinon, H. Geissel, R. Gernh ¨auser, J. Gerl, R. Janik, B. Jonson, B. Kindler, R. Kn ¨obel, R. Kr ¨ucken, M. Lantz, H. Lenske, Y . Litvinov, B. Lommel, K. Mahata, P. Maierbe...

    2009

  12. [19]

    Tshoo, Y

    K. Tshoo, Y . Satou, H. Bhang, S. Choi, T. Nakamura, Y . Kondo, S. Deguchi, Y . Kawada, N. Kobayashi, Y . Nakayama, K. N. Tanaka, N. Tanaka, N. Aoi, M. Ishihara, T. Motobayashi, H. Otsu, H. Sakurai, S. Takeuchi, Y . Togano, K. Yoneda, Z. H. Li, F. Delaunay, J. Gibelin, F. M. M...

    2012

  13. [20]

    Chaudhuri, C

    A. Chaudhuri, C. Andreoiu, T. Brunner, U. Chowdhury, S. Ettenauer, A. T. Gallant, G. Gwinner, A. A. Kwiatkowski, A. Lennarz, D. Lunney, T. D. Macdonald, B. E. Schultz, M. C. Simon, V . V . Simon, J. Dilling, Evidence for the extinction of then=20 neutron-shell closure for 32mg...

    2013

  14. [21]

    Marinova, W

    K. Marinova, W. Geithner, M. Kowalska, K. Blaum, S. Kap- pertz, M. Keim, S. Kloos, G. Kotrotsios, P. Lievens, R. Neugart, H. Simon, S. Wilbert, Charge radii of neon isotopes across the sdneutron shell, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 034313

    2011

  15. [22]

    D. T. Yordanov, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, M. De Rydt, C. Geppert, M. Kowalska, J. Kr ¨amer, K. Kreim, A. Krieger, P. Lievens, T. Neff, R. Neugart, G. Neyens, W. N ¨ortersh¨auser, R. S ´anchez, P. Vingerhoets, Nuclear charge radii of 21−32Mg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 042504

    2012

  16. [23]

    Thibault, R

    C. Thibault, R. Klapisch, C. Rigaud, A. M. Poskanzer, R. Prieels, L. Lessard, W. Reisdorf, Direct measurement of the masses of 11Li and 26−32Na with an on-line mass spectrometer, Phys. Rev. C 12 (1975) 644–657

    1975

  17. [24]

    Motobayashi, Y

    T. Motobayashi, Y . Ikeda, K. Ieki, M. Inoue, N. Iwasa, T. Kikuchi, M. Kurokawa, S. Moriya, S. Ogawa, H. Murakami, S. Shimoura, Y . Yanagisawa, T. Nakamura, Y . Watanabe, M. Ishihara, T. Teranishi, H. Okuno, R. Casten, Large deformation of the very neutron-rich nucleus 32Mg fr...

    1995

  18. [25]

    Pritychenko, T

    B. Pritychenko, T. Glasmacher, P. Cottle, M. Fauerbach, R. Ibbotson, K. Kemper, V . Maddalena, A. Navin, R. Ronnin- gen, A. Sakharuk, H. Scheit, V . Zelevinsky, Role of intruder configurations in 26,28Ne and 30,32Mg, Phys. Lett. B 461 (4) (1999) 322–328

    1999

  19. [26]

    Yanagisawa, M

    Y . Yanagisawa, M. Notani, H. Sakurai, M. Kunibu, H. Akiyoshi, N. Aoi, H. Baba, K. Demichi, N. Fukuda, H. Hasegawa, Y . Higurashi, M. Ishihara, N. Iwasa, H. Iwasaki, T. Gomi, S. Kanno, M. Kurokawa, Y . Matsuyama, S. Michimasa, T. Minemura, T. Mizoi, T. Nakamura, A. Saito, M. S...

    2003

  20. [27]

    Bastin, S

    B. Bastin, S. Gr ´evy, D. Sohler, O. Sorlin, Z. Dombr ´adi, N. L. Achouri, J. C. Ang ´elique, F. Azaiez, D. Baiborodin, R. Borcea, C. Bourgeois, A. Buta, A. B ¨urger, R. Chapman, J. C. Dalouzy, Z. Dlouhy, A. Drouard, Z. Elekes, S. Franchoo, S. Iacob, B. Laurent, M. Lazar, X. L...

    2007

  21. [28]

    Otsuka, T

    T. Otsuka, T. Suzuki, R. Fujimoto, H. Grawe, Y . Akaishi, Evolution of nuclear shells due to the tensor force, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 232502

    2005

  22. [29]

    Lapoux, V

    V . Lapoux, V . Som `a, C. Barbieri, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, S. R. Stroberg, Radii and binding energies in oxygen isotopes: A challenge for nuclear forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 052501

    2016

  23. [30]

    Poves, J

    A. Poves, J. Retamosa, The onset of deformation at theN=20 neutron shell closure far from stability, Phys. Lett. B 184 (4) (1987) 311–315

    1987

  24. [31]

    E. K. Warburton, J. A. Becker, B. A. Brown, Mass systematics forA=29−−44 nuclei: The deformed a∼32 region, Phys. Rev. C 41 (1990) 1147–1166

    1990

  25. [32]

    S. J. Novario, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. Papenbrock, Charge radii of exotic neon and magnesium isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 051303

    2020

  26. [33]

    M. K. Gaidarov, P. Sarriguren, A. N. Antonov, E. Moya de Guerra, Ground-state properties and symmetry energy of neutron-rich and neutron-deficient mg isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 064301

    2014

  27. [34]

    Z. Ren, Z. Y . Zhu, Y . H. Cai, G. Xu, Relativistic mean-field study of Mg isotopes, Phys. Lett. B 380 (3) (1996) 241–246

    1996

  28. [35]

    Rodr ´ıguez-Guzm´an, J

    R. Rodr ´ıguez-Guzm´an, J. Egido, L. Robledo, Angular momentum projected analysis of quadrupole collectivity in 30,32,34Mg and 32,34,36,38Si with the Gogny interaction, Phys. Lett. B 474 (1) (2000) 15–20

    2000

  29. [36]

    Borrajo, J

    M. Borrajo, J. L. Egido, Ground-state properties of even and odd magnesium isotopes in a symmetry-conserving approach, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 328–334

    2017

  30. [37]

    J. M. Yao, J. Meng, P. Ring, D. P. Arteaga, Three-dimensional angular momentum projection in relativistic mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 044312

    2009

  31. [38]

    G. X. Dong, X. B. Wang, H. L. Liu, F. R. Xu, Collectivity of neutron-rich magnesium isotopes investigated by projected shell model calculations, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 024328

    2013

  32. [39]

    Reinhard, W

    P.-G. Reinhard, W. Nazarewicz, Toward a global description of nuclear charge radii: Exploring the fayans energy density functional, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 064328

    2017

  33. [40]

    U. C. Perera, A. V . Afanasjev, P. Ring, Charge radii in covariant density functional theory: A global view, Phys. Rev. C 104 (2021) 064313

    2021

  34. [41]

    Miller, A

    G. Miller, A. Beck, S. May-Tal Beck, L. Weinstein, E. Piasetzky, O. Hen, Can long-range nuclear properties Be influenced by short range interactions? A chiral dynamics estimate, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 360–364

    2019

  35. [42]

    L. A. Souza, M. Dutra, C. H. Lenzi, O. Lourenc ¸o, Effects of short-range nuclear correlations on the deformability of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 065202

    2020

  36. [43]

    Cosyn, J

    W. Cosyn, J. Ryckebusch, Phase-space distributions of nuclear short-range correlations, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136526

    2021

  37. [44]

    Lalazissis, M

    G. Lalazissis, M. Sharma, P. Ring, Rare-earth nuclei: Radii, isotope-shifts and deformation properties in the relativistic mean-field theory, Nucl. Phys. A 597 (1) (1996) 35–65

    1996

  38. [45]

    An, X.-X

    R. An, X.-X. Dong, L.-G. Cao, F.-S. Zhang, Local variations of charge radii for nuclei with evenZfrom 84 to 120, Commun. Theo. Phys. 75 (3) (2023) 035301. 9

    2023

  39. [46]

    Mueller, I

    P. Mueller, I. A. Sulai, A. C. C. Villari, J. A. Alc ´antara- N´u˜nez, R. Alves-Cond´e, K. Bailey, G. W. F. Drake, M. Dubois, C. El´eon, G. Gaubert, R. J. Holt, R. V . F. Janssens, N. Lecesne, Z.-T. Lu, T. P. O’Connor, M.-G. Saint-Laurent, J.-C. Thomas, L.-B. Wang, Nuclear cha...

    2007

  40. [47]

    Geithner, T

    W. Geithner, T. Neff, G. Audi, K. Blaum, P. Delahaye, H. Feldmeier, S. George, C. Gu ´enaut, F. Herfurth, A. Her- lert, S. Kappertz, M. Keim, A. Kellerbauer, H.-J. Kluge, M. Kowalska, P. Lievens, D. Lunney, K. Marinova, R. Neugart, L. Schweikhard, S. Wilbert, C. Yazidjian, Mas...

    2008

  41. [48]

    A. E. Barzakh, D. V . Fedorov, V . S. Ivanov, P. L. Molkanov, F. V . Moroz, S. Y . Orlov, V . N. Panteleev, M. D. Seliverstov, Y . M. V olkov, Shell effect in the mean square charge radii and magnetic moments of bismuth isotopes nearN=126, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 014322

    2018

  42. [49]

    Nakada, Irregularities in nuclear radii at magic numbers, Phys

    H. Nakada, Irregularities in nuclear radii at magic numbers, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 044310

    2019

  43. [50]

    Day Goodacre, A

    T. Day Goodacre, A. V . Afanasjev, A. E. Barzakh, B. A. Marsh, S. Sels, P. Ring, H. Nakada, A. N. Andreyev, P. Van Duppen, N. A. Althubiti, B. Andel, D. Atanasov, J. Billowes, K. Blaum, T. E. Cocolios, J. G. Cubiss, G. J. Farooq-Smith, D. V . Fedorov, V . N. Fedosseev, K. T. F...

    2021

  44. [51]

    W. Long, J. Meng, N. Van Giai, S. G. Zhou, New effective interactions in relativistic mean field theory with nonlinear terms and density-dependent meson-nucleon coupling, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 034319

    2004

  45. [52]

    Reinhard, W

    P.-G. Reinhard, W. Nazarewicz, Nuclear charge densities in spherical and deformed nuclei: Toward precise calculations of charge radii, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2021) 054310

    2021

  46. [53]

    Rong, Accuracy of the mean-field theory in describing ground-state properties of light nuclei, Phys

    Y .-T. Rong, Accuracy of the mean-field theory in describing ground-state properties of light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 054314

    2023

  47. [54]

    R. An, L. Geng, S.-S. Zhang, Novel ansatz for charge radii in density functional theories, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 024307

    2020

  48. [55]

    An, S.-S

    R. An, S.-S. Zhang, L.-S. Geng, F.-S. Zhang, Charge radii of potassium isotopes in the rmf (bcs)* approach *, Chin. Phys. C 46 (5) (2022) 054101

    2022

  49. [56]

    Dobaczewski, H

    J. Dobaczewski, H. Flocard, J. Treiner, Hartree-Fock- Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line, Nucl. Phys. A 422 (1984) 103

    1984

  50. [57]

    Dobaczewski, W

    J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, T. R. Werner, J. F. Berger, C. R. Chinn, J. Decharg´e, Mean-field description of ground-state properties of drip-line nuclei: Pairing and continuum effects, Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 2809–2840

    1996

  51. [58]

    Yang, Y .-T

    D. Yang, Y .-T. Rong, R. An, R.-X. Shi, Potential signature of new magicity from universal aspects of nuclear charge radii, Phys. Rev. C 110 (2024) 064314

    2024

  52. [59]

    Ring, Relativistic mean field theory in finite nuclei, Prog

    P. Ring, Relativistic mean field theory in finite nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 193

    1996

  53. [60]

    Kucharek, P

    H. Kucharek, P. Ring, Relativistic field theory of superfluidity in nuclei, Z. Phys. A 339 (1991) 23

    1991

  54. [61]

    Y . Tian, Z. Y . Ma, P. Ring, A finite range pairing force for density functional theory in superfluid nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 676 (2009) 44

    2009

  55. [63]

    B.-N. Lu, J. Zhao, E.-G. Zhao, S.-G. Zhou, Multidimensionally- constrained relativistic mean-field models and potential-energy surfaces of actinide nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 014323

    2014

  56. [64]

    Zhou, Multidimensionally constrained covariant density functional theories-nuclear shapes and potential energy sur- faces, Phys

    S.-G. Zhou, Multidimensionally constrained covariant density functional theories-nuclear shapes and potential energy sur- faces, Phys. Scr. 91 (2016) 063008

    2016

  57. [65]

    G. A. Lalazissis, J. K ¨onig, P. Ring, New parametrization for the Lagrangian density of relativistic mean field theory, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 540

    1997

  58. [66]

    G. A. Lalazissis, T. Nik ˇsi´c, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, New relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 024312

    2005

  59. [67]

    Nik ˇsi´c, D

    T. Nik ˇsi´c, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, Relativistic nuclear energy density functionals: Adjusting parameters to binding energies, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 034318

    2008

  60. [68]

    K. Wang, B. Lu, Angular momentum and parity projected multidimensionally constrained relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model, Commun. Theor. Phys. 74 (1) (2022) 015303

    2022

  61. [69]

    Rong, X.-Y

    Y .-T. Rong, X.-Y . Wu, B.-N. Lu, J.-M. Yao, Anatomy of octupole correlations in 96zr with a symmetry-restored multidimensionally-constrained covariant density functional theory, Phys. Lett. B 840 (2023) 137896. 10

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.