Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Neural Face Skinning for Mesh-agnostic Facial Expression Cloning

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Skinning weights localize facial expression cloning to any target mesh.

desk verdict Skinning-weighted localization of a global FACS code is a real improvement over NFR/ZPT, but the paper's quantitative claims are softer than they look due to a circular inverse-rigging metric and a pseudo-GT ZPT baseline. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22416 v1 pith:S2KF6BOQ submitted 2025-05-28 cs.GR cs.CV

Sihun Cha , Serin Yoon , Kwanggyoon Seo , Junyong Noh This is my paper
classification cs.GRcs.CV
keywords facialexpressionretargetingmesh-agnosticskinningweightsFACSblendshapesglobal-localdeformationDiffusionNetinverseriggingcloning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that deep facial expression retargeting fails where a single global latent code flattens local detail, while local deformation methods sacrifice overall control. The proposed fix is to localize a global expression code at every vertex of the target mesh using predicted skinning weights, trained with indirect supervision from facial segmentation labels. The code is anchored to FACS-based blendshapes, so the result remains interpretable and editable. If the claim holds, arbitrary face meshes, including stylized characters with proportions far from human faces, can be animated with both regional fidelity and global controllability.

What carries the argument

The skinning encoder and skinning block carry the argument. A shared CNN + DiffusionNet frontend produces per-vertex features; the skinning encoder emits a per-vertex skinning feature, and a small MLP maps it through softmax to skinning weights $\omega_{\text{Skin}} \in \mathbb{R}^{128}$. The Hadamard product of those weights with the global expression code $z_{GE}$ yields a localized expression code $z_{LE}$ for every vertex, which conditions an eight-layer MLP decoder that outputs per-vertex displacements. The FACS-blendshape losses $L_{BP}$ and $L_{BR}$ are what tie this mechanism back to an interpretable, editable expression code.

What would settle it

Run a trained model on a target mesh that is a uniform two-fold upscale of a training identity. If the predicted skinning weights no longer follow semantic regions and the deformations move the wrong parts of the face, for instance the mouth action deforming the forehead, the transfer assumption fails. A second check is to compute predicted skinning weights on the same face represented with two different triangulations; if the weights diverge strongly for corresponding regions, they depend on mesh discretization rather than on facial semantics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that multiplying a global expression embedding by a per-vertex skinning vector converts a single global code into a spatially localized conditioning signal, and that the needed skinning vectors can be learned without manual rigs by supervising with segmentation labels. The model predicts per-vertex skinning weights from the target mesh geometry, localizes the global latent, and decodes per-vertex displacements, so retargeting requires no correspondences and no fixed mesh structure. Two blendshape-based losses tie the latent to the FACS grammar of the ICT model, giving the user an interpretable, editable expression code. The paper reports lower error than its baselines on expression fidelity and inverse rigging, and successful cloning on stylized meshes outside the training distribution.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that soft skinning weights learned from segmentation labels on the ICT model transfer reliably to arbitrary target meshes with different topologies and proportions; if the weights are inaccurate, the localized expression code produces poor deformations on unseen shapes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Expression cloning transfers to meshes with unseen topology and proportions, including stylized characters, because per-vertex skinning weights are learned from geometry rather than from a fixed template.
  • The FACS-aligned latent code makes inverse rigging and interactive editing possible: users can modify blendshape coefficients instead of raw vertex positions.
  • Because the decoder predicts per-vertex displacements directly, the method sidesteps Poisson-integration artifacts that appear in per-triangle Jacobian approaches.
  • Substituting a more expressive blendshape basis, such as one that includes head pose and neck motion, would extend the same pipeline to full-head animation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same per-vertex latent-localization trick should generalize to full-body or hand retargeting, where joint skinning weights already provide a natural prior.
  • The reliance on hand-labeled segments could eventually be removed by clustering blendshape influence regions in an unsupervised way, making the whole training pipeline automatic.
  • A stress test the paper does not run is feeding meshes with non-uniform scale changes or disconnected components to see whether predicted skinning weights stay semantically consistent.
  • The architecture suggests a generic recipe, global code multiplied by a per-element localization mask, for any deformation-transfer task that needs local fidelity without losing global control.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a facial expression retargeting method that combines a global, interpretable expression code (supervised to match FACS-based ICT blendshape coefficients) with per-vertex skinning weights predicted by a skinning encoder from segmentation labels. The skinning weights localize the global code, and a per-vertex decoder outputs displacements. The model is trained on synthetic ICT data and Multiface scans using losses for vertex/normal/Jacobian reconstruction, encoder regularization, blendshape projection and reconstruction, and a segmentation NLL loss. Experiments compare against NFR and ZPT on self-retargeting and inverse rigging, with ablations for the proposed components.

Significance. The core idea—localizing a global, user-interpretable expression code through learned per-vertex skinning weights—is interesting and potentially useful, as it could offer a better trade-off between intuitive control and local detail than existing global or local methods. The architecture and losses are clearly specified, and the ablation study in Tables 4–5 provides evidence that the skinning encoder and the blendshape-based losses contribute to the reported performance. If the mesh-agnostic generalization claim were quantitatively validated on truly unseen topologies and scales, this would be a valuable contribution to facial animation retargeting. However, as the paper stands, the central generalization claim is supported mainly by self-retargeting experiments and qualitative stylized-mesh results, with a partly circular inverse-rigging evaluation, so the evidence is not yet fully convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Table 3, Eqs. (4) and (7)]
  2. [Section 4, paragraph on ZPT training]
  3. [Sections 3.3 and 5, Figure 11]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.4 heading]
  2. [Figure 5 caption]
  3. [Equation (2)]
  4. [Table 1]

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Inverse-rigging table is a self-consistency check against the same ICT blendshape basis used to supervise the global code; the skinning and mesh-agnostic claims retain independent Multiface/stylized evidence.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2 (Inverse rigging), Eqs. 4 and 7, Table 3]
    "To validate if our constructed expression code conforms to the grammar of the FACS-based ICT blendshape model, we conducted experiments on inverse rigging. ... The expression codes were predicted from the source face mesh with expressions and applied to the ICT blendshape bases. The MSE between the reconstructed face mesh and the source face mesh was then computed. ... LBP = ||z_GE^{1:53} · B - z_GT · B||^2 (7)"

    The inverse-rigging metric reconstructs the source mesh by applying the predicted global expression code z_GE to the fixed ICT blendshape basis B and comparing to the source (Sec. 4.2). But on ICT data z_GE is trained by LExp (Eq. 4) to equal the ground truth blendshape coefficients and by LBP (Eq. 7) to make z_GE·B equal z_GT·B. Thus the reported 'inverse rigging quality' is essentially a held-out version of the same supervised objective using the same linear basis; it confirms that the encoder learned to invert the ICT parameterization that generated its training labels, not that the code has externally verified FACS interpretability or transfers to other rigs. The metric is therefore partly forced by construction.

full rationale

No load-bearing self-citation appears: the paper's architecture follows Qin et al. [QSA+], an external group with no author overlap, and the DiffusionNet, ICT, and Multiface references are independent resources. The central skinning mechanism is an empirical module: per-vertex z_Skin is supervised by an NLL loss with ICT segmentation labels (Eq. 2), MLP(z_Skin) forms per-vertex weights, and these weights gate z_GE via a Hadamard product. The claimed benefits are tested by held-out self-retargeting on ICT/Multiface and by qualitative retargeting on four unseen stylized meshes; those results are not entailed by the loss definitions, so the main derivation is self-contained. The partial circularity is limited to the inverse-rigging evaluation (Table 3, Sec. 4.2), where reconstruction uses the same ICT blendshape basis B that supervises z_GE through LExp and LBP, making that table a self-consistency check rather than an external benchmark. The paper's own Limitations section acknowledges that scale-mismatched meshes receive inaccurate skinning weights (Fig. 11), which is a scope/correctness risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities. The skinning weights are a learned per-vertex representation, not a newly postulated object. The main inductive biases are the segmentation labels and the FACS/blendshape supervision, which are domain assumptions about transferability across meshes.

free parameters (3)
  • decoder loss weights lambda_v, lambda_n, lambda_g = 10, 1, 1
    Chosen by hand in Eq. 3 to balance vertex, normal, and Jacobian terms; not fitted to data.
  • number of segmentation labels L (final model) = 20
    Selected from {6,14,20,24} based on best inverse rigging validation MSE in Section 4.4.
  • weights for LBP, LBR, Lnll losses = 1 each
    In Eq. 9, all auxiliary losses are summed with unit weight; no tuning reported.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Segmentation labels based on facial muscle groups provide consistent supervision for skinning weights across different face meshes.
    Used in Eq. 2 and Section 3.3; the paper argues segmentation regularizes the skinning encoder, and Figure 10 shows without it generalization suffers.
  • domain assumption ICT blendshape coefficients are an interpretable FACS-based parameterization that can supervise expression codes on arbitrary meshes.
    The expression code is trained to mimic ICT coefficients (Eq. 4) and the decoder is guided to behave like the ICT basis (Eq. 7, Eq. 8). This assumes the ICT semantic decomposition transfers to non-ICT geometry.
  • domain assumption DiffusionNet features generalize to meshes with different topologies and scales.
    Inherited from prior work [SACO] and used in all encoders; the paper's cross-mesh experiments test this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neural Face Skinning for Mesh-agnostic Facial Expression Cloning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S2KF6BOQ

@misc{pith2026250522416,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neural Face Skinning for Mesh-agnostic Facial Expression Cloning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S2KF6BOQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22416}
}
read the original abstract

Accurately retargeting facial expressions to a face mesh while enabling manipulation is a key challenge in facial animation retargeting. Recent deep-learning methods address this by encoding facial expressions into a global latent code, but they often fail to capture fine-grained details in local regions. While some methods improve local accuracy by transferring deformations locally, this often complicates overall control of the facial expression. To address this, we propose a method that combines the strengths of both global and local deformation models. Our approach enables intuitive control and detailed expression cloning across diverse face meshes, regardless of their underlying structures. The core idea is to localize the influence of the global latent code on the target mesh. Our model learns to predict skinning weights for each vertex of the target face mesh through indirect supervision from predefined segmentation labels. These predicted weights localize the global latent code, enabling precise and region-specific deformations even for meshes with unseen shapes. We supervise the latent code using Facial Action Coding System (FACS)-based blendshapes to ensure interpretability and allow straightforward editing of the generated animation. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate improved performance over state-of-the-art methods in terms of expression fidelity, deformation transfer accuracy, and adaptability across diverse mesh structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22416 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We present a method that enables direct retargeting between two facial meshes with different shapes and mesh structures. Our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Brief illustration of the key idea. Our method localizes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Method overview. Illustration of the data flow at inference (a) and training (b). For simplicity, the encoders are omitted from (b) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overlaping regions between blendshape. The ICT blend [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual comparison of expression quality produced by our method and comparative methods. The MSE between the GT and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual comparison of inverse rigging quality produced by our method and comparative methods. The expression codes were predicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Segment label. Visualization of 20 segments on the ICT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Segment variation. Visualization of various segments used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visualization of expression cloning on stylized face meshes. Our method can animate arbitrary face meshes based on the ICT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The quality of expression cloning drops when the skin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.nonempty.mrnumber duplicate missing pop "" 'skip if duplicate empty 'pop " " swap * " " * write if FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write mrnumber output.nonempty.mrnumber newline INTEGERS nameptr namesleft numnames FUNCTION format.language language empty "" " (" language * ")" * if FUNCTION form...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry.original add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 i...

  4. [4]

    4, 1--17

    Noam Aigerman, Kunal Gupta, Vladimir G Kim, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Jun Saito, and Thibault Groueix, Neural jacobian fields: learning intrinsic mappings of arbitrary meshes, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41 (2022), no. 4, 1--17

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    3, 33--es

    Bernd Bickel, Mario Botsch, Roland Angst, Wojciech Matusik, Miguel Otaduy, Hanspeter Pfister, and Markus Gross, Multi-scale capture of facial geometry and motion, ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 26 (2007), no. 3, 33--es

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    7213--7222

    Giorgos Bouritsas, Sergiy Bokhnyak, Stylianos Ploumpis, Michael Bronstein, and Stefanos Zafeiriou, Neural 3d morphable models: Spiral convolutional networks for 3d shape representation learning and generation, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019, pp. 7213--7222

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    297--312

    Alan Brunton, Timo Bolkart, and Stefanie Wuhrer, Multilinear wavelets: A statistical shape space for human faces, Computer Vision--ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13, Springer, 2014, pp. 297--312

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Philippe Bergeron, 3-d character animation on the symbolics system, SIGGRAPH Course Notes (1987)

    work page 1987

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Volker Blanz and Thomas Vetter, A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (USA), SIGGRAPH '99, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1999, p. 187–194

    1999

  2. [10]

    3877--3886

    Timur Bagautdinov, Chenglei Wu, Jason Saragih, Pascal Fua, and Yaser Sheikh, Modeling facial geometry using compositional vaes, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 3877--3886

    2018

  3. [11]

    345--354

    Prashanth Chandran, Derek Bradley, Markus Gross, and Thabo Beeler, Semantic deep face models, 2020 international conference on 3D vision (3DV), IEEE, 2020, pp. 345--354

    2020

  4. [12]

    10101--10111

    Daniel Cudeiro, Timo Bolkart, Cassidy Laidlaw, Anurag Ranjan, and Michael Black, Capture, learning, and synthesis of 3D speaking styles , CVPR, 2019, pp. 10101--10111

    2019

  5. [13]

    4, 1--14

    Prashanth Chandran, Loic Ciccone, Markus Gross, and Derek Bradley, Local anatomically-constrained facial performance retargeting, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41 (2022), no. 4, 1--14

    2022

  6. [14]

    Byoungwon Choe and Hyeong-Seok Ko, Analysis and synthesis of facial expressions with hand-generated muscle actuation basis, ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses, 2006, pp. 21--es

    2006

  7. [15]

    2220--2229

    Prashanth Chandran and Gaspard Zoss, Anatomically constrained implicit face models, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 2220--2229

    2024

  8. [16]

    41, Wiley Online Library, 2022, pp

    Prashanth Chandran, Gaspard Zoss, Markus Gross, Paulo Gotardo, and Derek Bradley, Shape transformers: Topology-independent 3d shape models using transformers, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 41, Wiley Online Library, 2022, pp. 195--207

    2022

  9. [17]

    Paul Ekman and Wallace V Friesen, Facial action coding system, Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behavior (1978)

    1978

  10. [18]

    5, 1--38

    Bernhard Egger, William AP Smith, Ayush Tewari, Stefanie Wuhrer, Michael Zollhoefer, Thabo Beeler, Florian Bernard, Timo Bolkart, Adam Kortylewski, Sami Romdhani, et al., 3d morphable face models—past, present, and future, ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 39 (2020), no. 5, 1--38

    2020

  11. [19]

    3, 437--458

    Gabriele Fanelli, Matthias Dantone, Juergen Gall, Andrea Fossati, and Luc Van Gool, Random forests for real time 3d face analysis, IJCV 101 (2013), no. 3, 437--458

    2013

  12. [20]

    230--246

    Thibault Groueix, Matthew Fisher, Vladimir G Kim, Bryan C Russell, and Mathieu Aubry, 3d-coded: 3d correspondences by deep deformation, Proceedings of the european conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 230--246

    2018

  13. [21]

    6, 1--15

    Lin Gao, Jie Yang, Yi-Ling Qiao, Yu-Kun Lai, Paul L Rosin, Weiwei Xu, and Shihong Xia, Automatic unpaired shape deformation transfer, ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 37 (2018), no. 6, 1--15

    2018

  14. [22]

    4, 1--12

    Rana Hanocka, Amir Hertz, Noa Fish, Raja Giryes, Shachar Fleishman, and Daniel Cohen-Or, Meshcnn: a network with an edge, ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 38 (2019), no. 4, 1--12

    2019

  15. [23]

    Pushkar Joshi, Wen C Tien, Mathieu Desbrun, and Fr \'e d \'e ric Pighin, Learning controls for blend shape based realistic facial animation, ACM Siggraph 2006 Courses, 2006, pp. 17--es

    2006

  16. [24]

    11957--11966

    Zi-Hang Jiang, Qianyi Wu, Keyu Chen, and Juyong Zhang, Disentangled representation learning for 3d face shape, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 11957--11966

    2019

  17. [25]

    Jeff Kleiser, A fast, efficient, accurate way to represent the human face, SIGGRAPH’89 Course Notes 22: State of the Art in Facial Animation (1989), 36--40

    1989

  18. [26]

    John P Lewis, Ken Anjyo, Taehyun Rhee, Mengjie Zhang, Frederic H Pighin, and Zhigang Deng, Practice and theory of blendshape facial models., Eurographics (State of the Art Reports) 1 (2014), no. 8, 2

    2014

  19. [27]

    Tianye Li, Timo Bolkart, Michael J Black, Hao Li, and Javier Romero, Learning a model of facial shape and expression from 4d scans., ACM Trans. Graph. 36 (2017), no. 6, 194--1

    2017

  20. [28]

    Ruilong Li, Karl Bladin, Yajie Zhao, Chinmay Chinara, Owen Ingraham, Pengda Xiang, Xinglei Ren, Pratusha Prasad, Bipin Kishore, Jun Xing, and Hao Li, Learning formation of physically-based face attributes, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    2-3, 159--167

    Ko-Yun Liu, Wan-Chun Ma, Chun-Fa Chang, Chuan-Chang Wang, and Paul Debevec, A framework for locally retargeting and rendering facial performance, Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 22 (2011), no. 2-3, 159--167

    2011

  22. [30]

    Wan-Chun Ma, Graham Fyffe, and Paul Debevec, Optimized local blendshape mapping for facial motion retargeting, ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Talks, 2011, pp. 1--1

    2011

  23. [31]

    Thalmann Magnenat, Richard Laperri \`e re, and Daniel Thalmann, Joint-dependent local deformations for hand animation and object grasping, Proceedings of Graphics Interface'88, Canadian Inf. Process. Soc, 1988, pp. 26--33

    1988

  24. [32]

    277--288

    Jun-yong Noh and Ulrich Neumann, Expression cloning, Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 2001, pp. 277--288

    2001

  25. [33]

    6, 1--10

    Thomas Neumann, Kiran Varanasi, Stephan Wenger, Markus Wacker, Marcus Magnor, and Christian Theobalt, Sparse localized deformation components, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32 (2013), no. 6, 1--10

    2013

  26. [34]

    27, Wiley Online Library, 2008, pp

    Ver \'o nica Costa Orvalho, Ernesto Zacur, and Antonio Susin, Transferring the rig and animations from a character to different face models, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27, Wiley Online Library, 2008, pp. 1997--2012

    2008

  27. [35]

    451--457

    Frederick I Parke, Computer generated animation of faces, Proceedings of the ACM annual conference-Volume 1, 1972, pp. 451--457

    1972

  28. [36]

    Frederic I Parke, Control parameterization for facial animation, Computer Animation’91, Springer, 1991, pp. 3--14

    1991

  29. [37]

    296--301

    Pascal Paysan, Reinhard Knothe, Brian Amberg, Sami Romdhani, and Thomas Vetter, A 3d face model for pose and illumination invariant face recognition, 2009 sixth IEEE international conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance, Ieee, 2009, pp. 296--301

    2009

  30. [38]

    Dafei Qin, Jun Saito, Noam Aigerman, Groueix Thibault, and Taku Komura, Neural face rigging for animating and retargeting facial meshes in the wild, SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Papers, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Black, Generating 3d faces using convolutional mesh autoencoders, ECCV, 9 2018

    Anurag Ranjan, Timo Bolkart, Soubhik Sanyal, and Michael J. Black, Generating 3d faces using convolutional mesh autoencoders, ECCV, 9 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    1556--1560

    Stevo Rackovi \'c , Cl \'a udia Soares, Du s an Jakoveti \'c , Zoranka Desnica, and Relja Ljubobratovi \'c , Clustering of the blendshape facial model, 2021 29th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1556--1560

    2021

  33. [41]

    4, 1--12

    Roger Blanco I Ribera, Eduard Zell, John P Lewis, Junyong Noh, and Mario Botsch, Facial retargeting with automatic range of motion alignment, ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG) 36 (2017), no. 4, 1--12

    2017

  34. [42]

    3, 1--16

    Nicholas Sharp, Souhaib Attaiki, Keenan Crane, and Maks Ovsjanikov, Diffusionnet: Discretization agnostic learning on surfaces, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41 (2022), no. 3, 1--16

    2022

  35. [43]

    2, 1--12

    Yeongho Seol, John P Lewis, Jaewoo Seo, Byungkuk Choi, Ken Anjyo, and Junyong Noh, Spacetime expression cloning for blendshapes, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31 (2012), no. 2, 1--12

    2012

  36. [44]

    3, 399--405

    Robert W Sumner and Jovan Popovi \'c , Deformation transfer for triangle meshes, ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG) 23 (2004), no. 3, 399--405

    2004

  37. [45]

    J Rafael Tena, Fernando De la Torre, and Iain A Matthews, Interactive region-based linear 3d face models., ACM Trans. Graph. 30 (2011), no. 4, 76

    2011

  38. [46]

    5841--5850

    Qingyang Tan, Lin Gao, Yu-Kun Lai, and Shihong Xia, Variational autoencoders for deforming 3d mesh models, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 5841--5850

    2018

  39. [47]

    41, Wiley Online Library, 2022, pp

    Monica Villanueva Aylagas, Hector Anadon Leon, Mattias Teye, and Konrad Tollmar, Voice2face: Audio-driven facial and tongue rig animations with cvaes, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 41, Wiley Online Library, 2022, pp. 255--265

    2022

  40. [48]

    Daniel Vlasic, Matthew Brand, Hanspeter Pfister, and Jovan Popovic, Face transfer with multilinear models, ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses, 2006, pp. 24--es

    2006

  41. [49]

    4, 1--12

    Chenglei Wu, Derek Bradley, Markus Gross, and Thabo Beeler, An anatomically-constrained local deformation model for monocular face capture, ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 35 (2016), no. 4, 1--12

    2016

  42. [50]

    39, Wiley Online Library, 2020, pp

    Mengjiao Wang, Derek Bradley, Stefanos Zafeiriou, and Thabo Beeler, Facial expression synthesis using a global-local multilinear framework, Computer graphics forum, vol. 39, Wiley Online Library, 2020, pp. 235--245

    2020

  43. [51]

    Valerie L Winslow, Classic human anatomy in motion: The artist's guide to the dynamics of figure drawing, Watson-Guptill, 2015

    2015

  44. [52]

    8704--8714

    Jiashun Wang, Xueting Li, Sifei Liu, Shalini De Mello, Orazio Gallo, Xiaolong Wang, and Jan Kautz, Zero-shot pose transfer for unrigged stylized 3d characters, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 8704--8714

    2023

  45. [53]

    Cheng-hsin Wuu, Ningyuan Zheng, Scott Ardisson, Rohan Bali, Danielle Belko, Eric Brockmeyer, Lucas Evans, Timothy Godisart, Hyowon Ha, Xuhua Huang, Alexander Hypes, Taylor Koska, Steven Krenn, Stephen Lombardi, Xiaomin Luo, Kevyn McPhail, Laura Millerschoen, Michal Perdoch, Ma...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.