Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 40 references

X-ray View of Light-Induced Spin Reorientation in TmFeO$_{3}$: Direct Observation of a 90$^\circ$ N\'eel Vector Rotation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using time-resolved X-ray magnetic linear dichroism in reflection, this paper reports that a near-infrared pulse rotates the Néel vector of the antiferromagnet TmFeO3 by a full 90° within about 20 picoseconds, with no recovery within 2…

desk verdict New and careful static XMLD calibration supports a large ultrafast in-plane Néel rotation in TmFeO3, but the reported 7% transient signal does not quantitatively establish the claimed full 90° rotation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22462 v1 pith:5STSAUBV submitted 2025-05-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Somnath Jana , Ronny Knut , Dima Afanasiev , Niko Pontius , Christian Schü{ss}ler-Langeheine , Christian Tzschaschel , Daniel Schick , Alexey V. Kimel
show 3 more authors
Olof Karis Clemens von Korff Schmising Stefan Eisebitt
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords time-resolvedX-raymagneticlineardichroismNéelvectordynamicsspinreorientationtransitionantiferromagneticspintronicsrare-earthorthoferritereflectiongeometryfemtosecondprobeTmFeO3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

By combining a near-infrared pump with time-resolved X-ray magnetic linear dichroism (XMLD) measured in reflection at the Fe L edges, the paper reports a direct, element-specific view of laser-driven spin reorientation in the antiferromagnet TmFeO3. The central observation is that after optical excitation the Néel vector rotates within the a–c crystal plane, moving from the c-axis to the a-axis, and that this full $90^\circ$ rotation is complete within about 20 picoseconds. The rotated state persists for more than 2 nanoseconds, which the authors attribute to slow heat dissipation in the insulating crystal. A sympathetic reader cares because the probe is sensitive to the local Fe magnetic moment rather than to charge or transport effects, and because the reflection geometry removes the need for X-ray-transparent substrates, making the method applicable to antiferromagnetic thin films.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the XMLD asymmetry, defined as the normalized difference between X-ray reflectivities measured with linear polarization parallel and perpendicular to the spin axis; because XMLD scales with the square of the sublattice magnetization, it exists in antiferromagnets with no net moment. In this experiment the static asymmetry measured below (c-axis) and above (a-axis) the spin-reorientation transition serves as the quantitative calibrant: the pump-induced change in reflectivity at the Fe L3 edge is compared with that static asymmetry to infer a near-$90^\circ$ rotation. The time-resolved path of the Néel vector is then read from the pump-induced reflectivity transient at the maximum-asymmetry photon energy, and the a–c plane confinement is established by comparing signals with the a-axis versus the b-axis aligned vertically.

What would settle it

Measure the same pump-induced reflectivity change at the Fe L3 edge on a TmFeO3 crystal whose Néel vector is prevented from rotating, for example by pinning it with a strong magnetic field along the c-axis or by staying far below the spin-reorientation temperature with the same excitation fluence; if a comparable 7 percent spectral change at the XMLD asymmetry energy still appears, the signal is not purely a magnetic rotation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that transient XMLD signals track the Néel vector of TmFeO3 directly through the spin-reorientation transition. The static XMLD asymmetry between the low-temperature c-axis state and the high-temperature a-axis state is roughly 8.5–9 percent at the Fe L3 edge, and the pump-induced reflectivity change at a delay of 170 ps reaches about 7 percent, approximately 85 percent of that static asymmetry. Time-resolved traces at the maximum-asymmetry photon energy show the signal settling to a plateau within about 20 ps, while measurements with the b-axis aligned vertically show only a gradual about 1 percent change, indicating that the rotation stays within the a–c plane rather than tilting out of it. The authors conclude that the surface region probed by grazing-incidence reflection undergoes nearly the full $90^\circ$ reorientation, with no recovery up to 2 ns, and that this is an element-specific and largely artifact-free measure of the Néel vector dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the static XMLD spectrum measured at equilibrium temperatures remains a valid quantitative calibrant for the pump-induced reflectivity change at 32 K, so a roughly 7 percent transient signal can be read as about 85 percent of the static asymmetry and therefore a near-$90^\circ$ rotation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single near-infrared pulse can rotate the Néel vector of TmFeO3 by nearly $90^\circ$ within 20 ps, establishing a fast optical route toward writing antiferromagnetic order.
  • The rotated state is stable beyond 2 ns in this sample, meaning the written state persists on device-relevant timescales even though it is not permanent.
  • Reflection-geometry XMLD can resolve ultrafast antiferromagnetic dynamics at the Fe sites without requiring X-ray-transparent substrates, opening the method to thin films on application-relevant substrates.
  • The comparison with the earlier transmission study indicates that the measured rotation angle depends on probe depth; surface regions can rotate fully while transmission averages over a depth-dependent temperature gradient.
  • Because the b-axis signal remains small, any out-of-plane component of the Néel vector trajectory during the reorientation is negligible on the measured timescale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A systematic fluence and base-temperature series could reveal whether the $90^\circ$ rotation is threshold-like, which would support a thermally driven anisotropy-switch mechanism and predict a minimum energy cost per bit.
  • The small roughly 1 percent signal in the b-axis orientation suggests a non-rotational magnetic background; a two-color pump-probe scheme or polarization-dependent analysis could separate this thermal spin-disorder contribution and sharpen the rotation-angle estimate.
  • If the rotation is complete only in the roughly 10 nm surface region probed at grazing incidence, bulk-sensitive probes should see a smaller or slower rotation; testing this depth dependence would clarify how well the result transfers to thin-film devices.
  • The same reflection-XMLD approach could be applied to other rare-earth orthoferrites and compensated insulators, where the absence of net magnetization makes transport-based readout unreliable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved X-ray magnetic linear dichroism (XMLD) measurements in reflection geometry on a TmFeO3 single crystal after near-infrared laser excitation. The static XMLD asymmetry is calibrated by two independent methods that agree, giving a maximum asymmetry of about 8.5% near the Fe L3 edge. At 170 ps after excitation, the pump-induced change for horizontal polarization reaches about 7%, which the authors compare with the static asymmetry to infer a reorientation of the Néel vector from the c-axis toward the a-axis. Delay scans with vertical polarization show a change that saturates around 20 ps and persists without recovery up to 2 ns. A control measurement with the b-axis vertical shows only a gradual ~1% signal, which the authors interpret as evidence that the rotation occurs primarily within the a-c plane. The central claim is that the Néel vector undergoes a full 90° rotation within about 20 ps.

Significance. If the quantitative claim is upheld, the paper would demonstrate an element-specific, reflection-geometry X-ray probe of ultrafast antiferromagnetic order dynamics, with the static XMLD calibration carefully cross-checked by two methods and a useful control for out-of-plane rotation. The reflection geometry is a genuine methodological advance for accessing antiferromagnetic thin films. The paper is honest about several experimental limitations, such as the thermal background in the b-axis control and the absence of recovery within 2 ns. However, the headline quantitative conclusion of a full 90° rotation is not fully supported by the amplitude comparison, so the significance of the paper depends on the authors moderating or better supporting that claim. The reported qualitative picture—large in-plane rotation on a tens-of-picosecond timescale with a nonmagnetic background in the out-of-plane channel—is credible and worth publishing after revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Figs. 2(c) and 3(c)] The statement that the data show a 'full 90° rotation' is not quantitatively established. The transient pump-induced change at 170 ps is about 7%, whereas the static XMLD asymmetry between the c-axis and a-axis ground states is about 8.5%. The transient signal is therefore only about 82–85% of the full c-to-a contrast. Under the usual angular dependence of Fe L2,3 XMLD, reaching only 82–85% of the full contrast corresponds to a final Néel-vector angle of roughly 65–70° from c, not 90°, unless a nonlinear angular calibration is provided and justified. The authors should either report an inferred angle with an explicit angular calibration and uncertainty, or revise the abstract and conclusion to claim a large in-plane rotation rather than a complete 90° rotation.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4(a)] The b-axis control signal of about 1% over 60 ps is attributed to thermally induced spin excitations, but it is not subtracted from or otherwise used to bound the a-plane transient signal. If even a fraction of this background contributes to the vertical-polarization signal in the a-axis geometry, the magnetic component of the 7% transient is smaller, further reducing the inferred rotation angle. The paper should quantify the nonmagnetic background contribution in the geometry of Fig. 3(c), or state the uncertainty that this background introduces into the angle estimate.
  3. [Results and Discussion, Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)] The transient delay scans are presented without error bars or a statistical uncertainty analysis, and the claim that the reorientation is 'complete within approximately 20 ps' is read from the shape of the curve without a fit. Given that the quantitative 90° angle claim depends on the plateau amplitude and the timescale claim depends on the rise time, the authors should provide error bars, a fit with confidence interval, or at minimum an explicit estimate of the systematic uncertainty in the 20 ps timescale.
  4. [Experimental Methods and Results] The static XMLD spectrum used as a quantitative calibrant is measured at equilibrium temperatures of 50 K and 100 K, while the pump-induced transient is measured at 32 K under 45 mJ/cm² excitation. The paper does not assess whether pump-induced lattice expansion, electronic state filling, or transient changes in the crystal field could modify the XMLD cross-section itself, as opposed to only rotating the Néel vector. A control measurement of the nonmagnetic reflectivity change, for example at an off-resonance energy, would strengthen the calibration and the inferred angle.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The text 'on a ultrafast timescale' should read 'on an ultrafast timescale', and 'one of their most compelling feature' should be 'one of their most compelling features'.
  2. [Fig. 2(a) and Experimental Methods] The notation 'Ehor ∥ N' in Fig. 2(a) is inconsistent with the text stating that Ehor forms a 5° angle with the c-axis; please clarify whether the parallel label is approximate or whether the figure geometry differs from the stated angle.
  3. [Results and Discussion, paragraph following Fig. 4] The phrase 'cf. inset of Fig. 3(b)' in the b-axis orientation description appears to refer to the inset of Fig. 4(b) or the b-axis geometry in Fig. 4(a); this cross-reference should be corrected.
  4. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4(a)] The sentence 'the small negative XMLD signal observed may be attributed to a thermally induced spin-excitations' has a subject-verb agreement error and should be reworded, for example as 'may be attributed to thermally induced spin excitations'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the static XMLD asymmetry is an independently measured equilibrium calibrant, and the transient comparison is an external benchmark rather than a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a pump-induced reflectivity change of about 7% at 170 ps, compared with an equilibrium XMLD asymmetry of about 8.5%, indicates a nearly complete 90-degree rotation of the Néel vector in the a-c plane. This is a calibration argument, not a circular one: the static XMLD asymmetry is measured at equilibrium orientations (50 K with the Néel vector along c, and 100 K with it along a) and then used as an independent reference for the pump-induced signal. No free parameter is extracted from the transient data that would force the 90-degree conclusion, and the paper explicitly reports that the pump-induced change is roughly 85% of the static asymmetry, which is a quantitative comparison against an external benchmark rather than a definitional equivalence. The b-axis control measurement, showing a roughly 1% gradual change attributed to thermal spin excitations, is a separate control and is not used to construct the main signal; at most it raises a quantitative concern about background contamination, not a circularity. The paper does cite prior work by co-author Kimel et al. (2004) on optically driven spin reorientation in TmFeO3, but that citation provides background motivation and a comparison point, not the load-bearing derivation of the present XMLD observation. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz is imported to forbid alternatives. Whether 85% of the static asymmetry quantitatively corresponds to exactly 90 degrees rather than a somewhat smaller angle is a legitimate scientific question about calibration and angular dependence, but it is not a circularity: the paper's inference is testable against the independently measured static dichroism and is not equivalent to its own input by construction. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All quantitative conclusions rest on domain assumptions about the validity of the static XMLD calibration under strong optical pumping, the representativeness of the roughly 10 nm probed surface, and the negligibility of nonmagnetic reflectivity changes. No free parameters are fitted to the transient data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption XMLD reflectivity asymmetry is a monotonic, quantitative function of the angle between the X-ray polarization and the Néel vector, and this function is unchanged by the optical pump.
    The transient signal is converted to a rotation angle by comparison with the static XMLD measured at 50 K and 100 K (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). If the pump alters the XMLD cross-section or adds nonmagnetic reflectivity changes, the inferred angle is not valid.
  • domain assumption Equilibrium spin orientations below and above the spin reorientation transition are c-axis and a-axis, respectively.
    Used as the 0 degree and 90 degree reference states for the static calibration; taken from prior literature on TmFeO3 (refs. 32-36).
  • domain assumption The signal at 709 eV tracks the Néel vector orientation without significant state-filling or charge contributions at the probed time scales.
    The paper argues X-ray XMLD is element-specific and artifact-free, but the small b-axis signal of about 1% shows some non-rotational response exists, and no control experiment isolates state-filling at the Fe edge.
  • domain assumption The probed surface region of about 10 nm behaves magnetically like the bulk and its spin reorientation dynamics are representative of the material.
    The near 90 degree conclusion is drawn from grazing-incidence reflection penetrating roughly 10 nm; the paper explains the difference from Kimel's 30 degree result as surface versus bulk averaging, but no independent surface characterization is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray View of Light-Induced Spin Reorientation in TmFeO$_{3}$: Direct Observation of a 90$^\circ$ N\'eel Vector Rotation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5STSAUBV

@misc{pith2026250522462,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray View of Light-Induced Spin Reorientation in TmFeO$_3$: Direct Observation of a 90$^\circ$ N\'eel Vector Rotation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5STSAUBV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22462}
}
abstract

Using time-resolved X-ray magnetic linear dichroism in reflection, we provide a direct probe of the N\'eel vector dynamics in TmFeO$_3$ on a ultrafast timescale. Our measurements reveal that, following optical excitation, the N\'eel vector undergoes a spin reorientation transition primarily within the a-c plane, completing a full 90{\deg} rotation within approximately 20 ps. This study highlights the ability to probe dynamics of antiferromagnets at its intrinsic timescale in reflection geometry, paving the way for investigations of a wide range of antiferromagnets grown on application relevant substrates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22462 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color Online) Approximate crystal structure and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Colour Online) (a) Image of the TmFeO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Colour Online) (a) X-ray reflectivity spectra for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Colour Online) (a) Normalized pump-induced reflec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, “Antiferromagnetic spintronics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Antiferromagnetic metal spintronics,

    A. H. MacDonald and M. Tsoi, “Antiferromagnetic metal spintronics,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences 369, 3098–3114 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Spintronics of an- tiferromagnetic systems (review article),

    E. V. Gomonay and V. M. Loktev, “Spintronics of an- tiferromagnetic systems (review article),” Low Tempera- ture Physics 40, 17–35 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Theory of antiferromagnetic resonance,

    F. Keffer and C. Kittel, “Theory of antiferromagnetic resonance,” Phys. Rev. 85, 329–337 (1952)

    work page 1952

  5. [5]

    Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet,

    P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. ˇZelezn´ y, C. Andrews, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, V. Nov´ ak, K. Olejn ´ ık, F. Maccherozzi, S. S. Dhesi, S. Y. Martin, T. Wagner, J. Wunderlich, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, J. Kuneˇ s, J. S. Chauhan, M. J. Grzybowski, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, B. L. Gallagher, and T. Jungwirth, “Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet,” S...

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Mechanism of N´ eel order switching in antiferromagnetic thin films revealed by magnetotransport and direct imaging,

    L. Baldrati, O. Gomonay, A. Ross, M. Filianina, R. Le- brun, R. Ramos, C. Leveille, F. Fuhrmann, T. R. For- rest, F. Maccherozzi, S. Valencia, F. Kronast, E. Saitoh, J. Sinova, and M. Kl¨ aui, “Mechanism of N´ eel order switching in antiferromagnetic thin films revealed by magnetotransport and direct imaging,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 177201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Current-induced switching of antiferromagnetic order in mn2Au from first principles,

    Severin Selzer, Leandro Salemi, Andr´ as De´ ak, Eszter Si- mon, L´ aszl´ o Szunyogh, Peter M. Oppeneer, and Ulrich Nowak, “Current-induced switching of antiferromagnetic order in mn2Au from first principles,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 174416 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Relativistic n´ eel-order fields induced by electrical current in antiferromagnets,

    J. ˇZelezn´ y, H. Gao, K. V´ yborn´ y, J. Zemen, J. Maˇ sek, Aur´ elien Manchon, J. Wunderlich, Jairo Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Relativistic n´ eel-order fields induced by electrical current in antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 157201 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Laser-induced ultrafast spin dynamics in ErFeO3,

    J. A. de Jong, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Pisarev, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing, “Laser-induced ultrafast spin dynamics in ErFeO3,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 104421 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Large-amplitude spin dy- namics driven by a Thz pulse in resonance with an elec- tromagnon,

    T. Kubacka, J. A. Johnson, M. C. Hoffmann, C. Vicario, S. de Jong, P. Beaud, S. Gr¨ ubel, S.-W. Huang, L. Huber, L. Patthey, Y.-D. Chuang, J. J. Turner, G. L. Dakovski, W.-S. Lee, M. P. Minitti, W. Schlotter, R. G. Moore, C. P. Hauri, S. M. Koohpayeh, V. Scagnoli, G. Ingold, S...

    2014

  3. [11]

    Ultrafast optical modification of exchange inter- actions in iron oxides,

    R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, E. Hendry, A. Secchi, J. H. Mentink, M. Eckstein, A. Wu, R. V. Pisarev, V. V. Kruglyak, M. I. Katsnelson, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, “Ultrafast optical modification of exchange inter- actions in iron oxides,” Nature Communications 6, 8190 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Nonlinear spin control by terahertz- driven anisotropy fields,

    S. Baierl, M. Hohenleutner, T. Kampfrath, A. K. Zvezdin, A. V. Kimel, R. Huber, and R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, “Nonlinear spin control by terahertz- driven anisotropy fields,” Nature Photonics 10, 715–718 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Resolving the spin reorientation and crystal-field transitions in TmFeO 3 with terahertz transient,

    Kailin Zhang, Kai Xu, Xiumei Liu, Zeyu Zhang, Zuan- ming Jin, Xian Lin, Bo Li, Shixun Cao, and Guohong 6 Ma, “Resolving the spin reorientation and crystal-field transitions in TmFeO 3 with terahertz transient,” Scien- tific Reports 6, 23648 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Ultrafast and energy-efficient quenching of spin order: Antiferromagnetism beats fer- romagnetism,

    Nele Thielemann-K¨ uhn, Daniel Schick, Niko Pon- tius, Christoph Trabant, Rolf Mitzner, Karsten Holl- dack, Hartmut Zabel, Alexander F¨ ohlisch, and Chris- tian Sch¨ ußler-Langeheine, “Ultrafast and energy-efficient quenching of spin order: Antiferromagnetism beats fer- romagn...

    2017

  7. [15]

    Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics,

    P. Nˇ emec, M. Fiebig, T. Kampfrath, and A. V. Kimel, “Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics,” Nature Physics 14, 229–241 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Ultrafast control of magnetic interactions via light-driven phonons,

    D. Afanasiev, J. R. Hortensius, B. A. Ivanov, A. Sasani, E. Bousquet, Y. M. Blanter, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, and A. D. Caviglia, “Ultrafast control of magnetic interactions via light-driven phonons,” Nature Materials 20, 607–611 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Ultrafast con- trol of magnetic anisotropy by resonant excitation of 4 f electrons and phonons in Sm 0.7Er0.3FeO3,

    Gabriel Fitzky, Makoto Nakajima, Yohei Koike, Alfred Leitenstorfer, and Takayuki Kurihara, “Ultrafast con- trol of magnetic anisotropy by resonant excitation of 4 f electrons and phonons in Sm 0.7Er0.3FeO3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 107401 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Absence of evidence of electrical switching of the antiferromagnetic N´ eel vector,

    C. C. Chiang, S. Y. Huang, D. Qu, P. H. Wu, and C. L. Chien, “Absence of evidence of electrical switching of the antiferromagnetic N´ eel vector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 227203 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Non-magnetic origin of spin hall magnetoresistance-like signals in Pt films and epitaxial NiO/Pt bilayers,

    A. Churikova, D. Bono, B. Neltner, A. Wittmann, L. Scipioni, A. Shepard, T. Newhouse-Illige, J. Greer, and G. S. D. Beach, “Non-magnetic origin of spin hall magnetoresistance-like signals in Pt films and epitaxial NiO/Pt bilayers,” Applied Physics Letters 116, 022410 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Electrical switching of tristate an- tiferromagnetic N´ eel order in α-Fe2O3 epitaxial films,

    Yang Cheng, Sisheng Yu, Menglin Zhu, Jinwoo Hwang, and Fengyuan Yang, “Electrical switching of tristate an- tiferromagnetic N´ eel order in α-Fe2O3 epitaxial films,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 027202 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Quantitative study on current-induced ef- fect in an antiferromagnet insulator/Pt bilayer film,

    Pengxiang Zhang, Joseph Finley, Taqiyyah Safi, and Luqiao Liu, “Quantitative study on current-induced ef- fect in an antiferromagnet insulator/Pt bilayer film,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 247206 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Laser-induced ultrafast spin reorienta- tion in the antiferromagnet TmFeO3,

    A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsvetkov, R. V. Pisarev, and Th. Rasing, “Laser-induced ultrafast spin reorienta- tion in the antiferromagnet TmFeO3,” Nature 429, 850– 853 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    Impulsive gen- eration of coherent magnons by linearly polarized light in the easy-plane antiferromagnet FeBO 3,

    A. M. Kalashnikova, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Pisarev, V. N. Gridnev, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing, “Impulsive gen- eration of coherent magnons by linearly polarized light in the easy-plane antiferromagnet FeBO 3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 167205 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Ultrafast optical excitation of coherent magnons in antiferromagnetic NiO,

    Christian Tzschaschel, Kensuke Otani, Ryugo Iida, Tsu- tomu Shimura, Hiroaki Ueda, Stefan G¨ unther, Manfred Fiebig, and Takuya Satoh, “Ultrafast optical excitation of coherent magnons in antiferromagnetic NiO,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 174407 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Ultrafast magneto-optics in nickel: Magnetism or optics?

    B. Koopmans, M. van Kampen, J. T. Kohlhepp, and W. J. M. de Jonge, “Ultrafast magneto-optics in nickel: Magnetism or optics?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 844–847 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves,

    Tobias Kampfrath, Alexander Sell, Gregor Klatt, Alexej Pashkin, Sebastian M¨ ahrlein, Thomas Dekorsy, Martin Wolf, Manfred Fiebig, Alfred Leitenstorfer, and Rupert Huber, “Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves,” Nature Photonics 5, 31–34 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    X-ray magnetic dichroism of antiferromagnet Fe2O3: The orientation of magnetic mo- ments observed by Fe 2p x-ray absorption spectroscopy,

    Pieter Kuiper, Barry G. Searle, Petra Rudolf, L. H. Tjeng, and C. T. Chen, “X-ray magnetic dichroism of antiferromagnet Fe2O3: The orientation of magnetic mo- ments observed by Fe 2p x-ray absorption spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1549–1552 (1993)

    1993

  20. [28]

    Resonant magneto-optical properties of fe near its 2 p levels: Mea- surement and applications,

    J. B. Kortright and Sang-Koog Kim, “Resonant magneto-optical properties of fe near its 2 p levels: Mea- surement and applications,” Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216– 12228 (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    Buried antiferromagnetic films investigated by x- ray magneto-optical reflection spectroscopy,

    P. M. Oppeneer, H.-Ch. Mertins, D. Abramsohn, A. Gaupp, W. Gudat, J. Kuneˇ s, and C. M. Schnei- der, “Buried antiferromagnetic films investigated by x- ray magneto-optical reflection spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 052401 (2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    Anisotropic x-ray mag- netic linear dichroism at the L2,3 edges of cubic Fe, Co, and Ni: Ab initio calculations and model theory,

    J. Kuneˇ s and P. M. Oppeneer, “Anisotropic x-ray mag- netic linear dichroism at the L2,3 edges of cubic Fe, Co, and Ni: Ab initio calculations and model theory,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 024431 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    Applicability and breakdown of transient magnetic linear dichroism,

    E. I. Harris-Lee, J. K. Dewhurst, P. Elliott, S. Shall- cross, and S. Sharma, “Applicability and breakdown of transient magnetic linear dichroism,” Phys. Rev. B 108, L100303 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Review of recent work on the magnetic and spectroscopic properties of the rare-earth orthoferrites,

    R. L. White, “Review of recent work on the magnetic and spectroscopic properties of the rare-earth orthoferrites,” Journal of Applied Physics 40, 1061–1069 (1969)

    1969

  25. [33]

    The mag- netic structure of thulium orthoferrite, TmFeO 3,

    J.A. Leake, G. Shirane, and J.P. Remeika, “The mag- netic structure of thulium orthoferrite, TmFeO 3,” Solid State Communications 6, 15–17 (1968)

    1968

  26. [34]

    Spin reorientation in ErFeo3 single crystals observed by neutron diffraction,

    H. Pinto, G. Shachar, H. Shaked, and S. Shtrikman, “Spin reorientation in ErFeo3 single crystals observed by neutron diffraction,” Phys. Rev. B 3, 3861–3863 (1971)

    1971

  27. [35]

    Neutron- scattering studies of spin waves in rare-earth orthofer- rites,

    S. M. Shapiro, J. D. Axe, and J. P. Remeika, “Neutron- scattering studies of spin waves in rare-earth orthofer- rites,” Phys. Rev. B 10, 2014–2021 (1974)

    1974

  28. [36]

    Interplay of Fe and Tm moments through the spin-reorientation transition in TmFeO3,

    U. Staub, L. Rettig, E. M. Bothschafter, Y. W. Windsor, M. Ramakrishnan, S. R. V. Avula, J. Dreiser, C. Pi- amonteze, V. Scagnoli, S. Mukherjee, C. Niedermayer, M. Medarde, and E. Pomjakushina, “Interplay of Fe and Tm moments through the spin-reorientation transition in TmFeO3...

    2017

  29. [37]

    Magnetocrystalline anisotropy in x-ray magnetic linear dichroism at the 3 p edges of crystalline Fe thin films,

    M. F. Tesch, D. Legut, H.-Ch. Mertins, M. C. Gilbert, C. Jansing, J. Hamrle, J. Rusz, P. M. Oppeneer, D. E. B¨ urgler, C. M. Schneider, A. Gaupp, and U. Berges, “Magnetocrystalline anisotropy in x-ray magnetic linear dichroism at the 3 p edges of crystalline Fe thin films,” Ph...

    2014

  30. [38]

    Fem- toSpeX: a versatile optical pump–soft X-ray probe fa- cility with 100fs X-ray pulses of variable polarization,

    Karsten Holldack, Johannes Bahrdt, Andreas Balzer, Uwe Bovensiepen, Maria Brzhezinskaya, Alexei Erko, Andrea Eschenlohr, Rolf Follath, Alexander Firsov, Win- fried Frentrup, Lo ¨ ıc Le Guyader, Torsten Kachel, Pe- ter Kuske, Rolf Mitzner, Roland M¨ uller, Niko Pontius, Torsten...

    2014

  31. [39]

    Optical properties of thulium orthoferrite TmFeO3,

    P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, A. M. Balbashov, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing, “Optical properties of thulium orthoferrite TmFeO3,” Physics of the Solid State 47, 2292–2298 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    Joachim Stoehr and Hans Christoph Siegmann, Mag- netism From Fundamentals to Nanoscale Dynamics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, 2006)

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.