pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.22488 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Raman Optical Activity Induced by Ferroaxial Order in NiTiO₃

Gakuto Kusuno , Takeshi Hayashida , Takayuki Nagai , Hikaru Watanabe , Rikuto Oiwa , Tsuyoshi Kimura , Takuya Satoh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 13:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Raman optical activityferroaxial orderNiTiO3centrosymmetric crystalcircular polarizationphonon calculationsdomain structureelectric dipole approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ferroaxial order produces Raman optical activity in centrosymmetric non-magnetic NiTiO3.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Raman optical activity can appear in crystals that keep both inversion and time-reversal symmetry when they also possess ferroaxial order. Experiments on single-crystal NiTiO3 using circularly polarized Raman light detect a clear intensity difference in the cross-circular channels that tracks the ferroaxial domains. Symmetry arguments together with first-principles phonon calculations and tight-binding models show the effect is intrinsic to the ferroaxial structure and survives inside the ordinary electric-dipole description of light-matter interaction. This result widens ROA from its usual settings in chiral molecules or magnets to a practical probe of ferroaxial order in ordinary centrosymmetric solids.

Core claim

Natural Raman optical activity arises in NiTiO3 from its ferroaxial order, a spontaneous rotational distortion that breaks rotational symmetry while preserving centrosymmetry and time-reversal symmetry. The activity is observed as an intensity contrast between right- and left-circularly polarized Raman channels and matches the spatial pattern of ferroaxial domains. First-principles and tight-binding calculations confirm that the signal is generated already within the electric-dipole approximation and does not require higher multipoles or magnetic contributions.

What carries the argument

Ferroaxial order, the spontaneous breaking of rotational symmetry by a uniform axial vector in a centrosymmetric crystal that couples to circularly polarized Raman scattering.

If this is right

  • ROA becomes a direct optical probe of ferroaxial domain structure in centrosymmetric materials.
  • The effect does not require magnetic order or molecular chirality, so it applies to a wider class of crystals.
  • First-principles phonon calculations can quantitatively predict the ROA strength once the ferroaxial distortion is known.
  • Circular-polarization Raman setups already in use can now map ferroaxial domains without additional equipment.
  • The ROA signal remains finite in the electric-dipole limit, simplifying theoretical modeling of the effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism could be tested in other known ferroaxial compounds such as certain perovskite oxides to confirm generality.
  • ROA mapping might be combined with domain-imaging techniques to study how ferroaxial domains respond to applied fields or strain.
  • If the effect scales with domain size, it could enable optical readout of ferroaxial states in thin-film devices.
  • The finding links ferroaxial order to optical activity phenomena that were previously associated only with chirality.

Load-bearing premise

The measured intensity difference between opposite circular polarizations is produced by the ferroaxial order itself rather than by residual strain, surfaces, or other unintended symmetry breakers in the crystals.

What would settle it

If the ROA contrast disappears when the sample is heated above the ferroaxial ordering temperature or when measured on a centrosymmetric crystal that lacks ferroaxial order, the claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22488 by Gakuto Kusuno, Hikaru Watanabe, Rikuto Oiwa, Takayuki Nagai, Takeshi Hayashida, Takuya Satoh, Tsuyoshi Kimura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of NiTiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a), (b) Experimental setups for circularly polarized Raman spectroscopy in the cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Raman spectra of the front (a, b) and back (c, d) surfaces of the single-domain NiTiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Excitation frequency ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Imaging of ferroaxial domains in NiTiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Raman optical activity (ROA), the dependence of Raman intensity on the circular polarization of incident and scattered light, has traditionally been observed in chiral molecules and magnetic materials, where inversion or time-reversal symmetry is broken. Here we demonstrate that ROA can also arise in a centrosymmetric and non-magnetic ferroaxial crystal. Using circularly polarized Raman spectroscopy on single-crystalline NiTiO$_3$, we observed a pronounced ROA signal in the cross-circular polarization configurations, which correlates with the ferroaxial domain structure. Our symmetry analysis, first-principles calculations of phonons, and tight-binding model calculations reveal that the natural ROA originates from the ferroaxial order and persists even within the electric dipole approximation. These results establish ROA as a powerful probe of ferroaxial order in centrosymmetric systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental observation of Raman optical activity (ROA) in cross-circular polarization channels on single-crystal NiTiO3, a centrosymmetric non-magnetic ferroaxial material. The ROA signal correlates with the ferroaxial domain structure. Symmetry analysis, first-principles phonon calculations, and tight-binding modeling are presented to show that the ROA originates from the ferroaxial order and remains allowed within the electric-dipole approximation.

Significance. If the central attribution holds, the work would establish ROA as a spectroscopic probe of ferroaxial order in systems lacking broken inversion or time-reversal symmetry. Strengths include the parameter-free symmetry analysis tied directly to the ferroaxial order parameter, the supporting first-principles phonon calculations, and the tight-binding model that demonstrates a dipole-allowed ROA term; these elements provide a coherent theoretical framework independent of intensity fitting.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental Results] Experimental section (domain-correlated ROA maps): The central claim that the cross-circular ROA intensity difference arises intrinsically from ferroaxial order rests on observed domain correlation. However, without quantitative bounds on possible residual strain, surface reconstruction, or domain-wall contributions (e.g., via strain-dependent control measurements or surface-sensitive probes), alternative extrinsic symmetry-breaking mechanisms cannot be fully excluded as the source of the observed signal.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure 3 (or equivalent ROA spectra panel): Axis labels and polarization configuration legends could be enlarged for improved readability of the cross-circular intensity differences.
  2. [Symmetry Analysis] Symmetry analysis paragraph: The explicit form of the ferroaxial-order-induced Raman tensor component should be stated once in the main text rather than only in the supplement to aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the experimental evidence. We address the concern point by point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Experimental section (domain-correlated ROA maps): The central claim that the cross-circular ROA intensity difference arises intrinsically from ferroaxial order rests on observed domain correlation. However, without quantitative bounds on possible residual strain, surface reconstruction, or domain-wall contributions (e.g., via strain-dependent control measurements or surface-sensitive probes), alternative extrinsic symmetry-breaking mechanisms cannot be fully excluded as the source of the observed signal.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative controls would further strengthen the attribution. However, the central claim is supported by multiple independent elements that go beyond domain correlation alone. Our symmetry analysis shows that the ferroaxial order parameter (A2u in the high-temperature phase) directly permits a nonzero ROA in the cross-circular channels within the electric-dipole approximation, without requiring inversion or time-reversal breaking. This is confirmed by first-principles phonon calculations that yield Raman tensors consistent with the observed selection rules and by the tight-binding model, which derives an explicit dipole-allowed ROA term proportional to the ferroaxial distortion amplitude. The spatial correlation of the ROA signal with independently mapped ferroaxial domains (via optical birefringence and other probes) further ties the effect to the order parameter. The signal is absent above the ferroaxial transition temperature and reproducible across multiple crystals. While we have not performed dedicated strain-dependent or surface-sensitive measurements in the present study, the consistency of the data and the microscopic models make extrinsic mechanisms unlikely to account for the full domain-correlated intensity. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing possible extrinsic contributions (residual strain, surface reconstruction, domain walls) and explaining why they are inconsistent with the observed temperature dependence, selection rules, and microscopic calculations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations independently support ferroaxial ROA

full rationale

The paper grounds its central claim in standard symmetry analysis (showing ferroaxial order permits dipole-allowed ROA terms), first-principles phonon calculations, and a tight-binding model. These steps derive the natural ROA signal from the ferroaxial order without reducing to fitted experimental intensities or self-definitional loops. The observed correlation with domain structure is presented as supporting evidence rather than a constructed prediction. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the derivation chain; the theoretical results remain externally falsifiable via group theory and computational methods independent of the NiTiO3 spectra.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the validity of the symmetry analysis linking ferroaxial order to ROA within the electric-dipole limit and on the assumption that the observed domain-correlated signal is not contaminated by other effects.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ferroaxial order in NiTiO3 breaks the necessary symmetries to allow ROA while preserving inversion and time-reversal.
    Invoked in the symmetry analysis section of the abstract to explain the origin of the signal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5692 in / 1332 out tokens · 40597 ms · 2026-05-19T13:12:17.029834+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. D. Barron,Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity, 2nd ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    L. D. Barron and A. D. Buckingham, Rayleigh and Raman scattering from optically active molecules, Mol. Phys.20, 1111 (1971)

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    E. M. Lacinska, M. Furman, J. Binder, I. Lutsyk, P. J. Kowalczyk, R. Stepniewski, and A. Wysmolek, Raman Optical Activity of 1T-TaS 2, Nano Lett.22, 2835 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    H. F. Yang, K. Y. He, J. Koo, S. W. Shen, S. H. Zhang, G. Liu, Y. Z. Liu, C. Chen, A. J. Liang, K. Huang, M. X. Wang, J. J. Gao, X. Luo, L. X. Yang, J. P. Liu, Y. P. Sun, S. C. Yan, B. H. Yan, Y. L. Chen, X. Xi, and Z. K. Liu, Visualization of Chiral Electronic Structure and Anomalous Optical Response in a Material with Chiral Charge Density Waves, Phys. ...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Y. Zhao, Z. Nie, H. Hong, X. Qiu, S. Han, Y. Yu, M. Liu, X. Qiu, K. Liu, S. Meng, L. Tong, and J. Zhang, Spectroscopic visualization and phase manipulation of chiral charge density waves in 1T-TaS2, Nat. Commun.14, 2223 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    G. Liu, T. Qiu, K. He, Y. Liu, D. Lin, Z. Ma, Z. Huang, W. Tang, J. Xu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Gao, J. Wen, J.-M. Liu, B. Yan, and X. Xi, Electrical switching of ferro- rotational order in nanometre-thick 1T-TaS 2 crystals, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 854 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    V. A. Martinez, Y. Gao, J. Yang, F. Lyzwa, Z. Liu, C. J. Won, K. Du, V. Kiryukhin, S. W. Cheong, and A. A. Sirenko, Ferroaxial phonons in chiral and polar NiCo 2TeO6, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064411 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    R. D. Johnson, S. Nair, L. C. Chapon, A. Bombardi, C. Vecchini, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, and P. G. Radaelli, Cu3Nb2O8: A Multiferroic with Chiral Coupling to the Crystal Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 137205 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Cheong, D

    S.-W. Cheong, D. Talbayev, V. Kiryukhin, and A. Saxena, Broken symmetries, non-reciprocity, and multiferroicity, npj Quantum Mater.3, 19 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Hlinka, J

    J. Hlinka, J. Privratska, P. Ondrejkovic, and V. Janovec, Symmetry Guide to Ferroaxial Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 177602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale mul- 13 tipoles under crystallographic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B98, 165110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    W. Jin, E. Drueke, S. Li, A. Admasu, R. Owen, M. Day, K. Sun, S.-W. Cheong, and L. Zhao, Observation of a ferro-rotational order coupled with second-order nonlinear optical fields, Nat. Phys.16, 42 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Yamagishi, T

    S. Yamagishi, T. Hayashida, R. Misawa, K. Kimura, M. Hagihala, T. Murata, S. Hirose, and T. Kimura, Ferroaxial Transitions in Glaserite-type Compounds: Database Screening, Phonon Calculations, and Experimental Verification, Chem. Mater.35, 747 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Electric toroidal dipole order and hidden spin polarization in ferroaxial materials, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043141 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Hayashida, Y

    T. Hayashida, Y. Uemura, K. Kimura, S. Matsuoka, D. Morikawa, S. Hirose, K. Tsuda, T. Hasegawa, and T. Kimura, Visualization of ferroaxial domains in an order-disorder type ferroaxial crystal, Nat. Commun.11, 4582 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Yokota, T

    H. Yokota, T. Hayashida, D. Kitahara, and T. Kimura, Three-dimensional imaging of ferroax- ial domains using circularly polarized second harmonic generation microscopy, npj Quantum Mater.7, 106 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    X. Guo, R. Owen, A. Kaczmarek, X. Fang, C. De, Y. Ahn, W. Hu, N. Agarwal, S. H. Sung, R. Hovden, S.-W. Cheong, and L. Zhao, Ferrorotational domain walls revealed by electric quadrupole second harmonic generation microscopy, Phys. Rev. B107, L180102 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Hayashida, K

    T. Hayashida, K. Kimura, and T. Kimura, Electric field–induced magnetochiral dichroism in a ferroaxial crystal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.120, e2303251120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Sekine, T

    D. Sekine, T. Sato, Y. Tokunaga, T. Arima, and M. Matsubara, Second harmonic imaging of antiferromagnetic domains and confirmation of absence of ferroaxial twins in MnTiO 3, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 064406 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Carbin, K. Du, B. Li, K. Wang, C. Li, T. Qian, N. Ni, S.-W. Cheong, and A. Kogar, Directionally asymmetric nonlinear optics in ferrorotational MnTiO 3, Phys. Rev. B112, L121108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Lerch, H

    M. Lerch, H. Boysen, R. Neder, F. Frey, and W. Laqua, Neutron scattering investigation of the high temperature phase transition in NiTiO 3, J. Phys. Chem. Solids53, 1153 (1992)

    work page 1992

  22. [22]

    Garton, S

    G. Garton, S. Smith, and B. M. Wanklyn, Crystal growth from the flux systems PbO-V 2O5 and Bi2O3-V2O5, J. Cryst. Growth13–14, 588 (1972). 14

    work page 1972

  23. [23]

    Hayashida, Y

    T. Hayashida, Y. Uemura, K. Kimura, S. Matsuoka, M. Hagihala, S. Hirose, H. Morioka, T. Hasegawa, and T. Kimura, Phase transition and domain formation in ferroaxial crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 124409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    [28, 32–34, 38–55]

    See Supplemental Material [url] for experimental results of parallel-circular polarization con- figurations and exciting wavelength of 532 nm and 633 nm, first-principles calculations of phonons, derivations of Raman tensors and details of model calclations, which includes Refs. [28, 32–34, 38–55]

    work page

  25. [25]

    Li, J.-P

    M.-W. Li, J.-P. Yuan, X.-M. Gao, E.-Q. Liang, and C.-Y. Wang, Structure and optical ab- sorption properties of NiTiO 3 nanocrystallites, Appl. Phys. A122, 725 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    K. Dey, S. Sauerland, J. Werner, Y. Skourski, M. Abdel-Hafiez, R. Bag, S. Singh, and R. Klin- geler, Magnetic phase diagram and magnetoelastic coupling of NiTiO 3, Phys. Rev. B101, 195122 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Fujioka, J

    Y. Fujioka, J. Frantti, A. Puretzky, and G. King, Raman Study of the Structural Distortion in the Ni 1–xCoxTiO3 Solid Solution, Inorg. Chem.55, 9436 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    W. Qi, A. Mattursun, M. Gao, A. Hushur, and H. Zhang, Lattice dynamics of NiTiO 3 under high pressure: Raman evidence under two pressure-transmitting mediums, Results Phys.43, 106114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    L. D. Barron, Anti-stokes Raman optical activity, Mol. Phys.31, 1929 (1976)

    work page 1929

  30. [30]

    L. D. Barron and J. Vrbancich, Anti-stokes magnetic Raman optical activity and time reversal, Chem. Phys. Lett.92, 466 (1982)

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    Cenker, B

    J. Cenker, B. Huang, N. Suri, P. Thijssen, A. Miller, T. Song, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Direct observation of two-dimensional magnons in atomically thin CrI 3, Nat. Phys.17, 20 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons inα-HgS, Nat. Phys.19, 35 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Kusunose, R

    H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Symmetry-adapted modeling for molecules and crys- tals, Phys. Rev. B107, 195118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Oiwa and H

    R. Oiwa and H. Kusunose, Systematic Analysis Method for Nonlinear Response Tensors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 014701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, A. V. Balatsky, and N. A. Spaldin, Dynamical multiferroicity, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 014401 (2017). 15

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Lujan, J

    D. Lujan, J. Choe, S. Chaudhary, G. Ye, C. Nnokwe, M. Rodriguez-Vega, J. He, F. Y. Gao, T. N. Nunley, E. Baldini, J. Zhou, G. A. Fiete, R. He, and X. Li, Spin–orbit exciton–induced phonon chirality in a quantum magnet, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2304360121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA 3for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr.44, 1272 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Tatsumi, T

    Y. Tatsumi, T. Kaneko, and R. Saito, Conservation law of angular momentum in helicity- dependent Raman and Rayleigh scattering, Phys. Rev. B97, 195444 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter(Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Jorio, R

    A. Jorio, R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus,Raman Spectroscopy in Graphene Related Systems, 1st ed. (Wiley, 2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes forab initiototal-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  44. [44]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  45. [45]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron- energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    F. Zhou, M. Cococcioni, C. A. Marianetti, D. Morgan, and G. Ceder, First-principles pre- diction of redox potentials in transition-metal compounds with LDA + U, Phys. Rev. B70, 235121 (2004)

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    M. A. Ruiz Preciado, A. Kassiba, A. Morales-Acevedo, and M. Makowska-Janusik, Vibrational and electronic peculiarities of NiTiO3 nanostructures inferred from first principle calculations, RSC Adv.5, 17396 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Tursun, Y

    R. Tursun, Y. Su, Q. Yu, J. Tan, T. Hu, Z. Luo, and J. Zhang, Effect of doping on the structural, magnetic, and ferroelectric properties of Ni 1-xAxTiO3 (A = Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn; x 16 = 0, 0.05, and 0.1), J. Alloys Compd.773, 288 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular Momentum of Phonons and the Einstein–de Haas Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 085503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, K. Kobayashi, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, H. Kusunose, J. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Chiral phonons: Circularly polarized Raman spectroscopy and ab initio calculations in a chiral crystal tellurium, Chirality35, 338 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Oishi, Y

    E. Oishi, Y. Fujii, and A. Koreeda, Selective observation of enantiomeric chiral phonons in α-quartz, Phys. Rev. B109, 104306 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    J. A. Koningstein and O. S. Mortensen, Experimental observation of an antisymmetric Raman scattering tensor, Nature217, 445 (1968)

    work page 1968

  54. [54]

    O. S. Mortensen and J. A. Koningstein, Electronic Raman effect. II. Asymmetry of the scat- tering tensor for electronic Raman transitions, J. Chem. Phys.48, 3971 (1968)

    work page 1968

  55. [55]

    Hayami, R

    S. Hayami, R. Oiwa, and H. Kusunose, Electric Ferro-Axial Moment as Nanometric Rotator and Source of Longitudinal Spin Current, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 113702 (2022). 17 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL S1. Ferroaxial order in NiTiO 3 In Figs. 1(b) and 1(c), we show a simplified crystal structure in each phase of NiTiO 3 and depict only two TiO3 (NiO3) triangular pyra...

    work page 2022