Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 39 references

Symmetry tuning topological states of an axion insulator with noncollinear magnetic order

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that a modest in-plane magnetic field can rewire the topologically protected chiral conduction paths of the axion insulator EuIn2As2 by changing the magnetic symmetry of each magnetic domain separately.

desk verdict Solid field-tuned magnetic symmetry study; the hinge-state predictions hinge on an unverified bulk-gap assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22796 v1 pith:BTXHT734 submitted 2025-05-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

S. X. M. Riberolles , A. M. Nedić , B. Kuthanazhi , F. Ye , S. L. Bud'ko , P. C. Canfield , R. J. McQueeney , Junyeong Ahn
show 5 more authors
V. L. Quito T. V. Trevisan L. L. Wang P. P. Orth B. G. Ueland
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords axioninsulatorEuIn2As2broken-helixmagneticorderhingestatestopologicalphasetransitiondomainsin-planefieldneutrondiffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a weak in-plane magnetic field applied to the magnetic topological insulator EuIn2As2 changes the magnetic symmetry of each of its magnetic domains differently, and that these symmetry changes reshape the topological surface and hinge states. Some crystal surfaces that are metallic in zero field become gapped, while other surfaces exchange the sign of their Dirac mass, forcing the chiral conduction channels along the crystal edges to appear, disappear, or move. The authors also predict that magnetic domain walls pin chiral hinge states wherever a wall intersects surfaces with opposite signs of the Dirac mass, so the field can drag these conduction pathways across the sample. If correct, this offers a practical way to control dissipationless edge transport with fields of a few tenths of a tesla.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the $2'$ symmetry operation (a two-fold rotation followed by time reversal) of the magnetic space group C2'2'21, which protects the axion-insulator state. Surfaces normal to a $2'$ axis remain gapless, while surfaces related by $2'$ carry Dirac masses $m^{*}$ of opposite sign; hinge states develop along edges shared by surfaces with opposite signs of $m^{*}$. The paper shows how a modest in-plane field changes the magnetic space group of each domain (C2'2'21 → P1 → $P\bar{1}$ → C2'/c' → Cmc'm'), reorienting or destroying the $2'$ axes and thereby reconfiguring the allowed hinge-state pattern. The accompanying symmetry-constrained spin Hamiltonian reproduces the zero-field broken helix and predicts the domain-specific phase transitions that drive these symmetry changes.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission on the [1 1 0] surface of a single-domain sample, sweeping an in-plane field across 0.18 T, should show the Dirac cone gap opening as the crystal enters the P1 phase; if the cone remains gapless, the predicted field-induced topological phase transition is not realized.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the magnetic symmetry of EuIn2As2, an axion insulator protected by a combined two-fold rotation and time-reversal symmetry ($2'$), can be continuously tuned by an in-plane field, but the tuning is not the same for all magnetic domains. Neutron diffraction and magnetization data, interpreted with a symmetry-constrained spin Hamiltonian, show that domains D3± enter a canted A-type magnetic phase at about 0.18 T, while D1± and D2± pass through a sequence of lower-symmetry phases (P1, $P\bar{1}$, C2'/c') before reaching the same canted phase. Because the sign of the surface Dirac mass $m^{*}$ is tied to the magnetic space group, these domain-specific transitions change which surfaces host gapped Dirac states, and therefore which crystal edges carry chiral hinge states. In particular, the authors predict that a weak field below 0.18 T gaps the [1 1 0] surface Dirac cones in D1±/D2± via the P1 phase, and that further field changes the pattern of gapped surfaces, inducing topological phase transitions on certain surfaces. They also find that hinge states are pinned to magnetic domain walls wherever the wall intersects surfaces with opposite signs of $m^{*}$, allowing the conduction path to move with the wall.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the bulk topological gap of EuIn2As2 stays open for all fields up to the field-polarized phase, so that the surface-state and hinge-state analysis remains valid throughout; the paper cites its prior density-functional-theory calculation for this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hinge-state conduction in EuIn2As2 can be switched on and off by fields on the order of 0.2 T, within reach of ordinary permanent magnets.
  • The direction of the in-plane field selects which domain-wall-pinned hinge states exist, potentially enabling a topological switch that routes current along specific crystal edges.
  • Surface-sensitive probes (for example, tunneling spectroscopy or photoemission) should see a field-induced gap open on certain surfaces, such as [1 1 0], at fields near 0.18 T.
  • Because the phase transitions are domain-specific, the boundary-state pattern can serve as a probe of the local magnetic domain configuration in the crystal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-tuning mechanism could extend to other noncollinear-magnetic axion insulators, so the approach may become a general route for field control of topological boundary states.
  • The thickness of antiferromagnetic domain walls (tens to hundreds of nanometers) may blur the predicted wall-pinned hinge state, and whether a sharp conduction channel persists is an open question that direct transport measurements would settle.
  • One could envision using local magnetic fields or strain to write and move domain walls, effectively programming the chiral conduction network in a crystal, though this goes beyond what the present paper demonstrates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines single-crystal neutron diffraction, magnetization measurements, a symmetry-constrained classical spin model, and DFT-based surface band-structure calculations to describe how an in-plane magnetic field tunes the magnetic order of the axion insulator candidate EuIn2As2 from its broken-helix ground state to a field-polarized state. The authors identify field-dependent magnetic phases and magnetic space groups for the three domain pairs, compare calculated magnetic diffraction patterns semi-quantitatively to measured intensities, and use surface-Dirac-mass sign arguments to predict field-tunable hinge states and domain-wall-pinned chiral conduction paths. The central claim is that modest in-plane fields can control the location and existence of topological hinge states in this material.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the paper provides a concrete materials platform for controlling topological boundary states with weak magnetic fields, including a new mechanism of hinge states pinned to magnetic domain walls. The zero-field neutron refinement is solid, the symmetry analysis is careful and systematic, and the calculation of domain-resolved diffraction patterns is a valuable tool for interpreting field-dependent neutron data. The paper makes falsifiable predictions, such as specific field-induced surface gapping and hinge-state patterns, that can be tested by future transport and spectroscopic experiments, and the model and symmetry assignments are presented in enough detail to be reproduced.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Figs. 4 and 5] The central prediction of field-tunable hinge states and domain-wall-pinned chiral channels requires that EuIn2As2 remains a gapped axion insulator in every magnetic phase traversed between the broken-helix and field-polarized endpoints. The manuscript supports this only by citing prior DFT [3] for the broken-helix and field-polarized states, while the new DFT in Figs. 4d and 4e is a surface calculation for the P1 phase that assumes a gapped bulk. No bulk band-structure calculation is shown for the P1, P-bar-1, or two-angle-canted C2'/c' phases assigned in Fig. 4. If any of these intermediate configurations has a closed bulk gap, the surface-mass sign analysis and the hinge-state patterns in Fig. 5 do not apply. Please either compute the bulk gap over the full Brillouin zone for each intermediate phase or explicitly state that the topological predictions are conditional on the gap remaining open.
  2. [Section 2.2, Figs. 3 and 4] The magnetic-space-group assignments underlying the hinge-state predictions are obtained from a classical T=0 XY model whose parameters (J1, J2, K1, Dxy, J3) are fitted to the zero-field broken-helix order and to the magnetization step, and whose field scale is set by J3. The comparison to the neutron data in Figs. 3d-3f is semi-quantitative: the authors identify field values at which integrated intensities change slope and attribute them to specific domain transitions based on the model, but no direct refinement of the field-dependent magnetic structure or quantitative fit of the computed intensities to the data is provided. Since the predicted topological surface-state and hinge-state patterns depend on the specific sequence of magnetic space groups (e.g., C2'2'21 -> P1 -> P-bar-1 for D1+), a change in the phase boundaries or a different field-dependent structure would alter the conclusions. The authors should strengthen this link, for example by refining the field-dependent structures or by explicitly quantifying the uncertainty in the phase boundaries and its impact on the topological predictions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1] The sentence 'The apparent broadening of the (0 0 -3) Bragg peak in Fig. 3a between H=0.25 and 0.4 T' appears to refer to Fig. 3b or 3c rather than Fig. 3a, which is the magnetization panel.
  2. [References] The citations to [3] and [4] for the EuIn2As2 broken-helix order and to [3] for the prior DFT results point to general review references (Hasan & Moore and Vanderbilt) rather than to the prior EuIn2As2 papers (Refs. [15] and [16]); these citations should be corrected throughout the manuscript.
  3. [Section 4.1] The Methods section states that magnetization was measured at T=1.8 K, while Fig. 3a reports data at T=5 K; please clarify which temperature is correct and ensure consistency.
  4. [Eq. (1) and Section 4.3] The text describing the Dxy term says 'pinning on layer of spins', which appears to be a typo for 'pinning one layer of spins'.
  5. [Section 2.2] The phrase 'More details are given in in the SI' contains a duplicated 'in', and the reference 'Ref. [7]' in that sentence is ambiguous and should likely be 'Ref. [S7]' or another specific reference.
  6. [Abstract] The abstract contains the typo 'ab inito'; it should be 'ab initio'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Critical-field assignments for the field-induced phases are calibrated against the measured M(H) step, but the hinge-state and surface-gap predictions retain independent symmetry/DFT content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 2.2 (phase inference); Methods 4.3, Eq. (1); see also SI Sec. 2]
    "Using a variational method and S_i = 1, we found that J1 = -0.5, J2 = -0.6, K1 = 0.2, Dxy = -0.02, and J3 = 1 recreates the H=0 broken-helix order with the value of ϕrb = 127° previously reported [3] ... Considering the steps in the calculated M(h_th/J3) data in Fig. 4c, the step at H≈0.18 T in the measured M(H) data in Fig."

    The model parameters, especially the unconstrained combination (J1+J2)/J3 and the absolute scale J3, are fit to reproduce the zero-field helix angle (127°); no independent physical value of J3 is given. Mapping h_th/J3 to the measured field values requires rescaling J3 so the calculated magnetization step aligns with the H≈0.18 T step. The 'inferred' domain-specific phase transitions at 0.18, 0.25, and 0.7 T are therefore the model's fitted boundaries relabeled as field values, not free predictions. The hinge-state and surface-mass-sign patterns, however, follow from the magnetic space group of each phase and are separately supported by the new DFT surface calculation, so the central topological conclusion is not merely a restatement of the fit.

full rationale

The core derivation is a conditional symmetry analysis: given the magnetic space group of each field-induced phase obtained from the classical model, the signs of the surface Dirac masses and the presence of hinge states follow from standard T, P, and 2' arguments, and the new DFT surface calculation independently confirms that the [110] Dirac cone becomes gapped in the P1 phase. That part is self-contained and not circular. The circularity is limited to the calibration of the model: the spin parameters are fit to the zero-field broken-helix order, and because no independent J3 is stated, the absolute field scale is effectively set by matching the calculated M step to the measured H≈0.18 T step; consequently the specific critical-field assignments are not independent predictions. The additional premise that the bulk topological gap remains open in all intermediate phases (P1, P̄1, C2'/c') is supported only by self-citation to the authors' prior DFT work [3] and is not re-derived here; this is a load-bearing reliance, but since it is a published, externally checkable DFT result, I treat it as an evidence gap rather than a circular step. Overall, one significant fitted-input step exists, but the hinge-state patterns and the field-induced surface topological transition retain independent symmetry and DFT content, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model parameters are fit to the zero-field broken-helix state, and the field scale is matched to the magnetization step, so the field-evolution predictions are not parameter-free. The topological hinge-state analysis rests on the assumption that the bulk gap remains open, supported only by a prior self-cited DFT calculation. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • J1 (nearest-neighbor interlayer exchange) = -0.5 (units of J3=1)
    Chosen to reproduce the zero-field broken-helix ground state of EuIn2As2; not derived from first principles.
  • J2 (next-nearest-neighbor interlayer exchange) = -0.6 (units of J3=1)
    Chosen together with J1 to stabilize the broken-helix order.
  • K1 (nearest-neighbor biquadratic coupling) = 0.2 (units of J3=1)
    Introduced ad hoc to resolve the degeneracy of the broken-helix state and favor perpendicular neighboring spins.
  • Dxy (six-fold in-plane anisotropy) = -0.02 (units of J3=1)
    Small easy-axis anisotropy chosen to pin the blue spins along the experimentally observed directions.
  • J3 (third-neighbor exchange, energy scale) = 1 (unit setting scale; physical value not given)
    Sets the energy and field scale; the comparison between h_th/J3 and H effectively fixes J3 by matching the measured M(H) step near 0.18 T.
  • phi_rb (helix angle) = 127 degrees (model input)
    Taken from the authors' prior report [3], although the current sample refines to 120(3) degrees; SI considers an alternative 122 degrees.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Classical fixed-length spin model with S_i=1 represents the Eu2+ S=7/2 moments.
    Methods 4.3 uses a variational method with S_i=1; ignores quantum fluctuations and rescales the moment magnitude.
  • ad hoc to paper A biquadratic interaction K1>0 stabilizes the broken-helix state from the degenerate manifold.
    Introduced in SI section 2 without microscopic derivation; the alternative DM interaction is noted but not included.
  • domain assumption T=0 ground states computed for each field value describe the system at the measured temperature of 1.8 K.
    Measured data are at 1.8 K; thermal fluctuations and metastability are neglected in the model.
  • domain assumption The bulk topological gap remains open for all fields up to the polarized phase.
    Rests on the authors' prior DFT [3]; not independently reproduced in this paper.
  • domain assumption Magnetic domains remain equally populated and the ordered moment size does not change with field.
    Explicitly stated in Section 2.2; if false, the domain-resolved interpretation of the Bragg intensities changes.
  • ad hoc to paper The broad weak peaks flanking (1 0 -1) are short-range correlations and do not affect the conclusions.
    Stated in Section 2.1 without a quantitative analysis of their possible impact on the phase assignments.
  • domain assumption DFT with PBE+U (U=5.0 eV) captures the surface Dirac physics.
    Method described in Section 4.4; standard but not validated against experiment in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry tuning topological states of an axion insulator with noncollinear magnetic order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTXHT734

@misc{pith2026250522796,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry tuning topological states of an axion insulator with noncollinear magnetic order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTXHT734}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22796}
}
abstract

Topological properties of quantum materials are intimately related to symmetry. Here, we tune the magnetic order of the axion insulator candidate EuIn$_2$As$_2$ from its broken-helix ground state to the field-polarized phase by applying an in-plane magnetic field. Using results from neutron diffraction and magnetization measurements with ab inito theory and symmetry analysis, we determine how the field tunes the magnetic symmetry within individual magnetic domains and examine the resulting changes to the topological surface states and hinge states existing on edges shared by certain surfaces hosting gapped Dirac states. We predict field-tunable complex and domain-specific hinge-state patterns, with some crystal surfaces undergoing a field-induced topological phase transition. We further find that domain walls have pinned hinge states when intersecting certain crystal surfaces, providing another channel for tuning the chiral-charge-transport pathways.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    author Hasan, M. Z. & author Moore, J. E. title Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators . journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. volume 2 , pages 55--78 ( year 2011 ). ://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140432

    doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140432 2011

  2. [1]

    author Hasan, M. Z. & author Kane, C. L. title Colloquium: Topological insulators . journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 82 , pages 3045--3067 ( year 2010 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 2010

  3. [2]

    author Moore, J. E. title The birth of topological insulators . journal Nature volume 464 , pages 194--198 ( year 2010 ). ://doi.org/10.1038/nature08916

    doi:10.1038/nature08916 2010

  4. [4]

    author Vanderbilt, D. title Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators ( publisher Cambridge University Press , address Cambridge , year 2018 ). ://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662205

    doi:10.1017/9781316662205 2018

  5. [5]

    , author Liu, C.-X

    author Chang, C.-Z. , author Liu, C.-X. & author MacDonald, A. H. title Colloquium: Quantum anomalous Hall effect . journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 95 , pages 011002 ( year 2023 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.011002

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.011002 2023

  6. [6]

    , author Hughes, T

    author Qi, X.-L. , author Hughes, T. L. & author Zhang, S.-C. title Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 78 , pages 195424 ( year 2008 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195424

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.195424 2008

  7. [7]

    author Allwood, D. A. et al. title Magnetic domain-wall logic . journal Science volume 309 , pages 1688--1692 ( year 2005 ). ://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1108813

    doi:10.1126/science.1108813 2005

  8. [8]

    author Parkin, S. S. P. , author Hayashi, M. & author Thomas, L. title Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory . journal Science volume 320 , pages 190--194 ( year 2008 ). ://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1145799

    doi:10.1126/science.1145799 2008

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    author Vedmedenko, E. Y. et al. title The 2020 magnetism roadmap . journal J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. volume 53 , pages 453001 ( year 2020 ). ://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab9d98

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    , author Fabian, J

    author Z Z uti c \' c , I. , author Fabian, J. & author Das Sarma, S. title Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications . journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 76 , pages 323--410 ( year 2004 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323

    2004 doi

  3. [11]

    author Hirohata, A. et al. title Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications . journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. volume 509 , pages 166711 ( year 2020 ). ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885320302353

    2020

  4. [12]

    title Two applications of axion electrodynamics

    author Wilczek, F. title Two applications of axion electrodynamics . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 58 , pages 1799 ( year 1987 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1799

    1987 doi

  5. [13]

    , author Takahashi, R

    author Tanaka, Y. , author Takahashi, R. , author Zhang, T. & author Murakami, S. title Theory of inversion- Z _ 4 protected topological chiral hinge states and its applications to layered antiferromagnets . journal Phys. Rev. Res. volume 2 , pages 043274 ( year 2020 ). ://lin...

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    , author Ezawa, M

    author Wakatsuki, R. , author Ezawa, M. & author Nagaosa, N. title Domain wall of a ferromagnet on a three-dimensional topological insulator . journal Sci. Rep. volume 5 , pages 13638 ( year 2015 ). ://doi.org/10.1038/srep13638

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    author Riberolles, S. X. M. et al. title Magnetic crystalline-symmetry-protected axion electrodynamics and field-tunable unpinned Dirac cones in EuIn _2 As _2 . journal Nat. Commun. volume 12 , pages 999 ( year 2021 ). ://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21154-y

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    author Donoway, E. et al. title Multimodal Approach Reveals the Symmetry-Breaking Pathway to the Broken Helix in EuIn _2 As _2 . journal Phys. Rev. X volume 14 , pages 031013 ( year 2024 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031013

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    note See accompanying Supplemental Information

  10. [18]

    , author Shapiro, S

    author Shirane, G. , author Shapiro, S. M. & author Tranquada, J. M. title Neutron Scattering with a Triple-Axis Spectrometer: Basic Techniques ( publisher Cambridge University Press , address Cambridge , year 2002 ). ://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511534881

    2002 doi

  11. [19]

    author Lynn, J. W. title Magnetic neutron scattering (invited) . journal J. Appl. Phys. volume 75 , pages 6806--6810 ( year 1994 ). ://doi.org/10.1063/1.356839

    1994 doi

  12. [20]

    , author Rastelli, E

    author Pimpinelli, A. , author Rastelli, E. & author Tassi, A. title Classical and quantum quasi- 1 D Heisenberg model with competing interactions . journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter volume 1 , pages 7941 ( year 1989 ). ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/1/42/015

    1989 doi

  13. [21]

    title Effects of phase competition and frustration in itinerant and local-moment magnetic materials

    author Nedi \'c , A.-M. title Effects of phase competition and frustration in itinerant and local-moment magnetic materials . Ph.D. thesis, school Iowa State University ( year 2023 ). ://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/effects-phase-competition-frustration-itinerant/docv...

    2023

  14. [22]

    , author Kane, C

    author Zhang, F. , author Kane, C. L. & author Mele, E. J. title Surface states of topological insulators . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 86 , pages 081303 ( year 2012 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.081303

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    & author Vanderbilt, D

    author Varnava, N. & author Vanderbilt, D. title Surfaces of axion insulators . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 98 , pages 245117 ( year 2018 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.245117

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    author Qiu, J.-X. et al. title Axion optical induction of antiferromagnetic order . journal Nat. Mater. volume 22 , pages 583--590 ( year 2023 ). ://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01493-5

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    author Qiu, J.-X. et al. title Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2 D MnBi _2 Te _4 . journal Nature volume 641 , pages 62--69 ( year 2025 ). ://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08862-x

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Liu, Y

    author Ye, F. , author Liu, Y. , author Whitfield, R. , author Osborn, R. & author Rosenkranz, S. title Implementation of cross correlation for energy discrimination on the time-of-flight spectrometer CORELLI . journal J. Appl. Crystallogr. volume 51 , pages 315--322 ( year 20...

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    author Arnold, O. et al. title Mantid---Data analysis and visualization package for neutron scattering and SR experiments . journal Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A volume 764 , pages 156--166 ( year 2014 ). ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900214008729

    2014

  20. [28]

    title Mag2Pol : A program for the analysis of spherical neutron polarimetry, flipping ratio and integrated intensity data

    author Qureshi, N. title Mag2Pol : A program for the analysis of spherical neutron polarimetry, flipping ratio and integrated intensity data . journal J. Appl. Crystallogr. volume 52 , pages 175--185 ( year 2019 ). ://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718016084

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    author Perez-Mato, J. et al. title Symmetry-based computational tools for magnetic crystallography . journal Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. volume 45 , pages 217--248 ( year 2015 ). ://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021008

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    & author Izumi, F

    author Momma, K. & author Izumi, F. title VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data . journal J. Appl. Crystallogr. volume 44 , pages 1272--1276 ( year 2011 ). ://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970

    2011 doi

  23. [31]

    author Anderson, P. W. title in Exchange in Insulators: Superexchange, Direct Exchange, and Double Exchange (eds editor Rado, G. T. & editor Suhl, H. ) booktitle Magnetism Ch. chapter 2 , pages 25--83 ( publisher Academic Press , year 1963 ). ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a...

    1963

  24. [32]

    & author Bl\"ugel, S

    author Hoffmann, M. & author Bl\"ugel, S. title Systematic derivation of realistic spin models for beyond-Heisenberg solids . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 101 , pages 024418 ( year 2020 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.024418

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    & author Furthm\"uller, J

    author Kresse, G. & author Furthm\"uller, J. title Efficient iterative schemes for ab-initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 54 , pages 11169--11186 ( year 1996 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  26. [34]

    & author Furthm \"u ller, J

    author Kresse, G. & author Furthm \"u ller, J. title Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set . journal Comput. Mater. Sci. volume 6 , pages 15 -- 50 ( year 1996 ). ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii...

    1996

  27. [35]

    author Dudarev, S. L. , author Botton, G. A. , author Savrasov, S. Y. , author Humphreys, C. J. & author Sutton, A. P. title Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 57 , pages 1505--1509 ( year 19...

    1998 doi

  28. [36]

    , author Mostofi, A

    author Marzari, N. , author Mostofi, A. A. , author Yates, J. R. , author Souza, I. & author Vanderbilt, D. title Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications . journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 84 , pages 1419--1475 ( year 2012 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Re...

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    , author Zhang, S

    author Wu, Q. , author Zhang, S. , author Song, H.-F. , author Troyer, M. & author Soluyanov, A. A. title WannierTools : An open-source software package for novel topological materials . journal Comput. Phys. Commun. volume 224 , pages 405 -- 416 ( year 2018 ). ://www.scienced...

    2018

  30. [38]

    author Goforth, A. M. , author Klavins, P. , author Fettinger, J. C. & author Kauzlarich, S. M. title Magnetic properties and negative colossal magnetoresistance of the rare earth zintl phase EuIn _ 2 As _ 2 . journal Inorganic Chemistry volume 47 , pages 11048--11056 ( year 2...

    2008 doi

  31. [39]

    title New Mechanism of Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction

    author Moriya, T. title New Mechanism of Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 4 , pages 228--230 ( year 1960 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.228

    1960 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.