Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall effect under microwave drives

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Microwave breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall state in V-BST is caused by Joule heating of electron-hole puddles, so the threshold amplitude falls as the inverse square root of frequency.

desk verdict A solid experimental study of RF-driven QAH breakdown with a credible thermal mechanism, but the headline scaling law is a consistency check, not an independent prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23156 v1 pith:IWJB5BAQ submitted 2025-05-29 cond-mat.mes-hall

Torsten Röper , Daniel Rosenbach , Achim Rosch , Alexey A. Taskin , Yoichi Ando , Erwann Bocquillon This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantumanomalousHalleffectmicrowavebreakdownvariable-rangehoppingJouleheatingelectrontemperaturechargepuddlesV-doped(BiSb)2Te3Corbinogeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks why the zero-resistance state of a quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) insulator breaks down when a GHz-frequency microwave signal is applied to the gate, and it answers with a thermal mechanism. It argues that the microwave power is absorbed in electron-hole puddles, the locally conducting regions that form in the disordered V-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 film; the absorbed power heats the electron bath, and the higher electron temperature drives an increase of bulk conductance through phonon-assisted variable-range hopping. The claim is supported by converting the measured DC longitudinal conductance into an electron temperature through the equilibrium hopping law and then showing that the temperature follows the standard electron-phonon cooling balance $T_e = (T_p^\alpha + P_{\mathrm{diss}}/\Sigma)^{1/\alpha}$. Across Hall-bar and Corbino devices over 1–25 GHz, the extracted absorption grows linearly with frequency, so the breakdown threshold amplitude falls as $1/\sqrt{\omega}$. The consequence is that the QAH zero-resistance state is limited by a constant dissipated power, not by a critical photon energy or electric field, which puts a thermal budget at the centre of GHz-range QAH applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a two-bath Joule-heating model in which the DC conductance acts as a built-in thermometer. The equilibrium variable-range-hopping curve $\sigma(T_e) = (\sigma_0/T_e)\exp[-(T_0/T_e)^{1/2}]$, calibrated by a zero-RF temperature sweep, converts every measured longitudinal conductance into an electron temperature $T_e$. Thermal balance $P_{\mathrm{diss}} = \Sigma(T_e^\alpha - T_p^\alpha)$ then fixes how drive power maps to temperature, with the RF dissipation written as $P_{\mathrm{diss}} = G(\omega)U^2$. The combination of these two pieces, with $G(\omega)/\Sigma$ nearly linear in frequency, is what compresses the frequency, amplitude, and temperature data onto one breakdown description and yields the prediction $U_{\mathrm{BD}} \propto 1/\sqrt{\omega}$.

What would settle it

Measure the longitudinal conductance under short microwave pulses whose duration is shorter than the electron-phonon relaxation time: the Joule-heating model predicts that breakdown follows the time-averaged power and relaxes on a thermal timescale, whereas photon-assisted hopping would track the instantaneous field amplitude; alternatively, direct noise thermometry that disagrees with the $T_e$ inferred from the hopping law would falsify the thermometer assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that RF-induced breakdown of the QAH effect in V-BST is caused by Joule heating of electron-hole puddles, not by photon-assisted hopping or by a field-driven mechanism. The authors show that the DC conductance measured while the microwave drive is applied is quantitatively reproduced by the variable-range-hopping law $\sigma(T_e) = (\sigma_0/T_e)\exp[-(T_0/T_e)^{1/2}]$ with $T_e$ determined by equating dissipated power $P_{\mathrm{diss}}(\omega) = G(\omega)U^2$ to the phonon cooling power $P_{\mathrm{out}} = \Sigma(T_e^\alpha - T_p^\alpha)$. The frequency dependence of the fit parameter $G(\omega)/\Sigma \propto \omega^{1.05\pm 0.05}$ is consistent with absorption by finite-size puddles below the inverse Thouless time. Parameters extracted at base temperature predict the conductance at all other temperatures and amplitudes without additional fitting, while models based on photon-assisted hopping and on the field-driven effective-temperature picture fail to capture the data. A Corbino device shows the same onset of bulk conductance, confirming that the effect is bulk rather than edge transport.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured DC conductance under microwave drive can be converted into a single, spatially uniform electron temperature through the equilibrium variable-range-hopping calibration curve, with the thin-film phonons at that same temperature while the substrate phonons stay at the refrigerator temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At fixed threshold conductance, the breakdown amplitude scales as $U_{\mathrm{BD}} \propto 1/\sqrt{\omega}$, so higher-frequency drives break the QAH state at lower amplitudes.
  • Improving electron-phonon coupling (larger $\Sigma$) or reducing puddle absorption should push the breakdown to higher RF power, which is the practical route to lossless GHz-range devices.
  • Since the same dissipated power drives both DC and RF breakdown, the DC breakdown threshold and the RF breakdown threshold are linked through the thermal model, not through separate mechanisms.
  • A Corbino device shows the identical breakdown onset, meaning the effect is bulk conduction through the puddle network and must be included in any metrology or device model that assumes purely edge transport.
  • Together with residual dissipation at low amplitudes, the predicted threshold sets an upper bound on usable microwave power for QAH-based non-reciprocal and metrological components.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the heating picture is correct, engineering the thermal environment should shift the breakdown: a thicker or better-cooled substrate, or a heat-sinking layer over the film, should raise the RF amplitude needed to break the zero-resistance state at a given frequency.
  • The model predicts a slow thermal response: after a short RF pulse, the conductance should return to its base value on the electron-phonon relaxation timescale, whereas photon-assisted hopping would respond almost instantly to the field; a pulsed experiment could distinguish the two.
  • The nearly linear $G(\omega) \propto \omega$ behaviour should saturate or change once the frequency approaches the inverse Thouless time of the puddles; extending measurements beyond 25 GHz would test the puddle-size interpretation directly.
  • A direct cross-check of the thermometer assumption would be noise thermometry or a second temperature probe that does not rely on the equilibrium variable-range-hopping law, verifying that the inferred $T_e$ is real rather than an artefact of the calibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and modeling study of the breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) zero-resistance state in V-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 under microwave drives (1–25 GHz). The authors measure the DC longitudinal conductance of RF Hall bars and a Corbino device while applying microwave power, and observe a threshold RF amplitude for the onset of bulk conductance that decreases with increasing frequency. They propose that the RF power is absorbed by electron-hole puddles, heating the electron system, which in turn enhances phonon-assisted variable-range hopping (VRH) and thereby increases the longitudinal conductance. The central quantitative model equates the dissipated power to the cooling power P_out = Σ(Te^α − Tp^α), converts the measured conductance to an electron temperature Te through an equilibrium VRH calibration, and extracts the electron-phonon coupling parameters and a frequency-dependent dissipation ratio G(ω)/Σ. The model is reported to reproduce the amplitude, frequency, and temperature dependence of the conductance, including out-of-sample predictions of the temperature variation, and to yield a breakdown threshold U_BD ∝ 1/√ω. The paper's conclusion is that RF breakdown in these QAH devices is governed by Joule heating of charge puddles, not by photon-assisted hopping or electric-field-driven mechanisms, which are ruled out by comparison with alternative models in the Supplementary Material.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a physically coherent explanation of an important practical limitation of QAH devices at GHz frequencies: the zero-resistance state is destroyed when the dissipated RF power exceeds a critical value, rather than at a critical photon energy or electric field. This is significant for quantum metrology and microwave applications. The paper has several strengths: it tests the bulk origin of the conductivity increase in a Corbino geometry, it compares the heating model against two alternative mechanisms, it reports reproducibility across three samples with different disorder strengths, and it makes the data and codes openly available. The main quantitative support, however, rests on a nontrivial thermometric conversion of the DC conductance into a single uniform electron temperature, an assumption the authors explicitly acknowledge in the Supplementary Material but do not quantitatively validate. Because all extracted parameters (α, Σ, G(ω)/Σ) and the derived U_BD ∝ 1/√ω scaling depend on this conversion, the robustness of the central claim to violations of that assumption is the key open issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [Heating from microwaves; Fig. 4d] The load-bearing step is the conversion of the measured DC conductance into a single electron temperature Te through the equilibrium VRH formula σ(Te) = (σ0/Te) exp[−(T0/Te)^(1/2)]. This conversion implicitly assumes that the phonons in the 8 nm V-BST film are at the same temperature Te, while the substrate phonons remain at Tp, and that both temperatures are spatially uniform. The authors acknowledge these assumptions in the Supplementary, but do not provide evidence for their validity under RF drive, nor a quantitative sensitivity analysis. Since VRH is phonon-assisted, the relevant temperature for hopping is the film phonon temperature, not necessarily the electron temperature; if the electrons are heated while the film phonons remain closer to Tp, the inferred Te values—and consequently α, Σ, and G(ω)/Σ—would be systematically biased. As this conversion underpins every quantitative claim, the authors should either justify the two-temperature thermalization (e.g., by independent thermometry or a two-temperature model) or demonstrate that plausible violations of uniformity and electron-phonon equilibrium do not alter the central conclusions.
  2. [Heating from microwaves; Fig. 4d] The claimed prediction U_BD ∝ 1/√ω is derived directly from the fitted frequency dependence G(ω)/Σ = Aω^s with s ≈ 1.05 (Fig. 4b). Because U_BD is defined from the same σ(U) curves used to extract G(ω)/Σ at each frequency, the agreement in Fig. 4d is a restatement of the fit rather than an independent test of the model. The genuine out-of-sample test is the temperature variation (Figs. 2b, 2c, 4c), where parameters obtained at base temperature predict the finite-T data without additional fitting. The text should be revised to distinguish these two levels of validation and to avoid calling the frequency scaling a 'prediction' in the sense of an independent falsifiable consequence.
  3. [Heating from microwaves; Eq. (2); Fig. 2d] The model sets the dissipated RF power to Pdiss(ω) = G(ω) U^2 with G(ω) independent of Te and of U, and in the mixed DC+RF analysis writes Pdiss = Rxx I_DC^2 + U^2/Z with Z a free parameter. However, the dissipation occurs in the same puddle network whose conductance is strongly temperature-dependent; as Te rises, the effective absorption likely changes, creating a feedback between Te and Pdiss. The current treatment could absorb this feedback into the effective G(ω) or Z, potentially biasing the extracted frequency exponent s. The authors should assess whether a self-consistent treatment of the temperature-dependent absorption materially changes the extracted parameters or the conclusions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2)] Equation (2) and the surrounding text contain a parenthesis mismatch: 'Pout = Σ ( T α e − T α p )' appears as 'Pout = Σ T α e − T α p )' in the manuscript, which should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 4a and main text] The notation for the dissipated power is inconsistent: the main text writes Pdiss(ω) = G(ω) U^2, while Fig. 4a uses 'Power Pin' on the x-axis and Eq. (2) uses Pin and Pout. Please unify the notation for the applied power, the dissipated power, and the cooling power.
  3. [Supplementary, Fig. S3c] In the photon-assisted hopping comparison, the current is estimated as IRF ≈ U/RK using the von Klitzing constant, but in the strongly dissipative regime the impedance is no longer quantized; please clarify how this estimate is justified.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The UBD ∝ 1/√ω 'prediction' is a restatement of the fitted G(ω)/Σ power law; the central heating mechanism retains independent out-of-sample support.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Heating from microwaves' section, final paragraph, and Fig. 4d caption]
    "'According to our model, the breakdown threshold conductance σBD is reached for a constant heating power, thus defining a breakdown threshold amplitude UBD ∝ 1/√ω. To verify this simple prediction, we define in Fig.2 the breakdown threshold amplitude UBD as the amplitude U at which σ = σBD = 1 µS.' Fig. 4d caption: 'The black line corresponds to the predicted behavior UBD ∝ 1/√ω of the Joule heating model, extracted from the fit shown in b).'"

    With σBD fixed at 1 µS, the Joule model (Eq. 2) requires a constant heating power P_diss = G(ω)U_BD^2 = const × Σ, so U_BD ∝ [Σ/G(ω)]^{1/2}. The frequency dependence G(ω)/Σ = Aω^s is itself fitted from the same σ(U) data (Fig. 4b, s = 1.05 ± 0.05). Substituting gives U_BD = const × ω^{-s/2} ≈ const × ω^{-1/2}. The claimed 'prediction' is therefore algebraically identical to the fitted power law, not an independent check; the caption itself says it is 'extracted from the fit shown in b).' The agreement in Fig. 4d is a consistency check between two quantities extracted from the same data, not an out-of-sample test.

full rationale

The paper's central mechanism claim—RF-driven Joule heating of electron-hole puddles raising the electron temperature and enhancing VRH—is not circular. It is tested against out-of-sample temperature dependence: after fitting α and G(ω)/Σ at base temperature, the model predicts the σ(Tp) curves at various RF amplitudes and the Te(Pin) curves at elevated Tp with no further fitting parameters. Alternative mechanisms (photon-assisted hopping and Polyakov-Shklovskii electric-field breakdown) are quantitatively compared and rejected on data grounds, not by citation. The main circular element is the presented 'prediction' UBD ∝ 1/√ω: the UBD-frequency relation is derived from the same G(ω)/Σ = Aω^s fit that was extracted from the conductance-vs-amplitude curves, so the apparent agreement in Fig. 4d is a restatement of the fit rather than a new prediction. Self-citations to the authors' prior work [26] are not load-bearing here: the VRH form is also independently cited [32], and the VRH parameters (T0, σ0) are refit from the present data; the puddle-AC-dissipation argument is corroborated by external references [17, 22, 36]. The Supplementary's explicit 'Model approximations and assumptions' candidly acknowledges that the VRH-based thermometer assumes uniform Te and film phonons at Te; these are validity concerns about the inversion of a global DC conductance into a single electron temperature under RF drive, but they are stated assumptions rather than definitional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities; electron-hole puddles, VRH transport, and electron-phonon cooling are all taken from prior literature. The central claim rests on several fitted parameters (T0, sigma0, alpha, Sigma, G(omega)/Sigma, Z) and on uniformity assumptions that the authors explicitly acknowledge. The strongest independent evidence is the out-of-sample temperature prediction and the Corbino bulk measurement.

free parameters (6)
  • VRH activation temperature T0 = 17.0 ± 0.3 K (Sample A); 4.0 K (Sample B); 7.3 K (Sample C)
    Fitted to the zero-RF temperature dependence of the conductance using the Efros-Shklovskii VRH law; used to convert measured sigma to electron temperature Te.
  • VRH prefactor sigma0 = 490 ± 20 µS·K (Sample A)
    Fitted together with T0 to the same zero-RF temperature sweep; part of the thermometer calibration.
  • electron-phonon cooling exponent alpha = 4 (DC fit, Sample A); 3.2 to 5.0 across samples and RF fits
    Free parameter in the Joule heating model Pout = Sigma(Te^alpha - Tp^alpha); varies between samples.
  • electron-phonon coupling Sigma = 4.94 ± 0.02 nW/K^4 (DC, Sample A); 32.6 ± 0.7 µW/K^alpha (RF fit, Fig. 2b); 3.9 and 2.6 nW/K^alpha for Samples B and C
    Free parameter fitted to the Joule heating model; different values and units appear in DC and RF fits.
  • dissipation ratio G(omega)/Sigma per frequency = Fitted at each frequency; then parametrized as A omega^s with A = (420 ± 50) K^alpha S/GHz^s/W and s = 1.05 ± 0.05…
    Absorbed RF power is modeled as Pdiss = G(omega) U^2; the ratio G(omega)/Sigma is a free parameter at each frequency, and its frequency dependence is then fitted to a power law.
  • impedance Z in mixed DC+RF model = 3280 ± 60 Ω (Sample B, Fig. 2d)
    Free parameter used to combine DC and RF dissipated power as Pdiss = Rxx I^2 + U^2/Z.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The bulk conductance follows Efros-Shklovskii variable-range hopping sigma(Te) = (sigma0/Te) exp(-(T0/Te)^(1/2)).
    Invoked in main text (Fig. 3b) to describe the temperature dependence of the conductance and to calibrate electron temperature; supported by the zero-field data but assumed to remain valid under RF drive.
  • domain assumption Electron cooling to the phonon bath obeys Pout = Sigma(Te^alpha - Tp^alpha) with constant Sigma and 3 <= alpha <= 5.
    Standard hot-electron model for semiconductor devices at low temperature, cited to Refs [33-35]; used as the energy balance equation (Eq. 2).
  • ad hoc to paper Electron and phonon temperatures are uniform across the sample, and the V-BST film phonons equilibrate at Te while the InP substrate stays at Tp.
    Stated in Supplementary 'Model approximations and assumptions'; this uniformity assumption is needed to convert a single conductance value into a single Te, and the paper acknowledges it is a simplification.
  • ad hoc to paper The dissipated RF power is a single effective conductance times the square of the applied amplitude, Pdiss(omega) = G(omega) U^2, independent of temperature and amplitude.
    The paper explicitly states it models the complex microwave field geometry with a single effective dissipation parameter G(omega); this is a phenomenological modeling assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall effect under microwave drives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IWJB5BAQ

@misc{pith2026250523156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Breakdown of the quantum anomalous Hall effect under microwave drives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IWJB5BAQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23156}
}
abstract

Quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) insulators exhibit chiral dissipationless edge states without an external magnetic field, making them a promising material for quantum metrology and microwave applications. However, the breakdown of the zero-resistance state at low currents hinders progress. We investigate and characterize this breakdown under microwave fields (1-25 GHz) by measuring the increase of longitudinal resistance in RF Hall bars and RF Corbino devices made from V-doped (Bi,Sb)$_2$Te$_3$ films. Our results point to the role of heating of electron-hole puddles under microwave irradiation, thereby fostering hopping transport. Our work offers insights critical for GHz-range QAH applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23156 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamics of current-induced switching in the quantum anomalous Hall effect

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current-induced magnetization switching in V-doped topological insulator films is thermally activated by Joule heating, with stretched-exponential reversal of independent magnetic domains.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    \ Chang , author J

    author author C.-Z. \ Chang , author J. Zhang , author X. Feng , author J. Shen , author Z. Zhang , author M. Guo , author K. Li , author Y. Ou , author P. Wei , author L.-L. \ Wang , author Z.-Q. \ Ji , author Y. Feng , author S. Ji , author X. Chen , author J. Jia , author X. Dai , author Z. Fang , author S.-C. \ Zhang , author K. He , author Y. Wang , ...

    doi:10.1126/science.1234414

  2. [2]

    \ Chang , author W

    author author C.-Z. \ Chang , author W. Zhao , author D. Y. \ Kim , author H. Zhang , author B. A. \ Assaf , author D. Heiman , author S.-C. \ Zhang , author C. Liu , author M. H. W. \ Chan ,\ and\ author J. S. \ Moodera ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4204 journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 14 ,\ pages 473 ( year 2015 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nmat4204

  3. [3]

    Yu , author W

    author author R. Yu , author W. Zhang , author H.-J. \ Zhang , author S.-C. \ Zhang , author X. Dai ,\ and\ author Z. Fang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187485 journal journal Science \ volume 329 ,\ pages 61 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1187485

  4. [4]

    author author A. J. \ Bestwick , author E. J. \ Fox , author X. Kou , author L. Pan , author K. L. \ Wang ,\ and\ author D. Goldhaber-Gordon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.187201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 187201 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.187201

  5. [5]

    Götz , author K

    author author M. Götz , author K. M. \ Fijalkowski , author E. Pesel , author M. Hartl , author S. Schreyeck , author M. Winnerlein , author S. Grauer , author H. Scherer , author K. Brunner , author C. Gould , author F. J. \ Ahlers ,\ and\ author L. W. \ Molenkamp ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5009718 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 112 ,...

    doi:10.1063/1.5009718

  6. [6]

    author author E. J. \ Fox , author I. T. \ Rosen , author Y. Yang , author G. R. \ Jones , author R. E. \ Elmquist , author X. Kou , author L. Pan , author K. L. \ Wang ,\ and\ author D. Goldhaber-Gordon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075145 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ,\ pages 075145 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.075145

  7. [7]

    author author K. M. \ Fijalkowski , author N. Liu , author M. Klement , author S. Schreyeck , author K. Brunner , author C. Gould ,\ and\ author L. W. \ Molenkamp ,\ journal journal Nature Electronics \ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-024-01156-6 10.1038/s41928-024-01156-6 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41928-024-01156-6

  8. [8]

    Viola \ and\ author D

    author author G. Viola \ and\ author D. P. \ DiVincenzo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021019 journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 4 ,\ pages 021019 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.021019 2014

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    author author A. C. \ Mahoney , author J. I. \ Colless , author L. Peeters , author S. J. \ Pauka , author E. J. \ Fox , author X. Kou , author L. Pan , author K. L. \ Wang , author D. Goldhaber-Gordon ,\ and\ author D. J. \ Reilly ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01984-5...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Uday , author G

    author author A. Uday , author G. Lippertz , author K. Moors , author H. F. \ Legg , author R. Joris , author A. Bliesener , author L. M. C. \ Pereira , author A. A. \ Taskin ,\ and\ author Y. Ando ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02574-1 journal journal Nature Physics \ ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Beenakker , author P

    author author C. Beenakker , author P. Baireuther , author Y. Herasymenko , author I. Adagideli , author L. Wang ,\ and\ author A. Akhmerov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.146803 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 122 ,\ pages 146803 ( year 2019 a ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [12]

    Beenakker , author A

    author author C. Beenakker , author A. Grabsch ,\ and\ author Y. Herasymenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.2.022 journal journal SciPost Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 022 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Lippertz , author A

    author author G. Lippertz , author A. Bliesener , author A. Uday , author L. M. C. \ Pereira , author A. A. \ Taskin ,\ and\ author Y. Ando ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045419 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 106 ,\ pages 045419 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author K. M. \ Fijalkowski , author N. Liu , author P. Mandal , author S. Schreyeck , author K. Brunner , author C. Gould ,\ and\ author L. W. \ Molenkamp ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25912-w journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 5599 ( yea...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Kawamura , author R

    author author M. Kawamura , author R. Yoshimi , author A. Tsukazaki , author K. S. \ Takahashi , author M. Kawasaki ,\ and\ author Y. Tokura ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.016803 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 016803 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    Skinner \ and\ author B

    author author B. Skinner \ and\ author B. I. \ Shklovskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.075454 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 87 ,\ pages 075454 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    Bagchi , author L

    author author M. Bagchi , author L. Pitz-Paal , author C. P. \ Grams , author O. Breunig , author N. Borgwardt , author Z. Wang , author Y. Ando , author M. Gr\"uninger ,\ and\ author J. Hemberger ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.161121 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ vol...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Brede , author M

    author author J. Brede , author M. Bagchi , author A. Greichgauer , author A. Uday , author A. Bliesener , author G. Lippertz , author R. Yazdanpanah , author A. Taskin ,\ and\ author Y. Ando ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.104202 journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater...

    doi

  11. [19]

    \ Chang , author W

    author author C.-Z. \ Chang , author W. Zhao , author D. Y. \ Kim , author P. Wei , author J. K. \ Jain , author C. Liu , author M. H. W. \ Chan ,\ and\ author J. S. \ Moodera ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.057206 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 115 ,\ pa...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Ambegaokar , author B

    author author V. Ambegaokar , author B. I. \ Halperin ,\ and\ author J. S. \ Langer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2612 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 4 ,\ pages 2612 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

  13. [21]

    author author A. L. \ Efros \ and\ author B. I. \ Shklovskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/8/4/003 journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 8 ,\ pages L49 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    1975 doi

  14. [22]

    Baranovski ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/0470095067 title Charge transport in disordered solids \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

    author author S. Baranovski ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/0470095067 title Charge transport in disordered solids \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  15. [23]

    author author B. I. \ Shklovskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0034343 journal journal Low Temperature Physics \ volume 50 ,\ pages 1101 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    author author M. C. \ Dartiailh , author S. Hartinger , author A. Gourmelon , author K. Bendias , author H. Bartolomei , author H. Kamata , author J.-M. \ Berroir , author G. F\`eve , author B. Pla c c ais , author L. Lunczer , author R. Schlereth , author H. Buhmann , author ...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Kamata , author H

    author author H. Kamata , author H. Irie , author N. Kumada ,\ and\ author K. Muraki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033214 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 033214 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    R\"oper , author H

    author author T. R\"oper , author H. Thomas , author D. Rosenbach , author A. Uday , author G. Lippertz , author A. Denis , author P. Morfin , author A. A. \ Taskin , author Y. Ando ,\ and\ author E. Bocquillon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L161403 journal journal Ph...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Keiper \ and\ author R

    author author R. Keiper \ and\ author R. F. \ Schuchardt ,\ https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:96770592 journal journal Physica Status Solidi B-basic Solid State Physics \ volume 85 ,\ pages 155 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  20. [28]

    author author I. P. \ Zvyagin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2220880117 journal journal Physica Status Solidi (b) \ volume 88 ,\ pages 149 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978 doi

  21. [29]

    @noop note The supplementary information provides information about the calibration, the Corbino device, a discussion of other mechanisms, and the results of other samples. Stop

  22. [30]

    Bennaceur , author P

    author author K. Bennaceur , author P. Jacques , author F. Portier , author P. Roche ,\ and\ author D. C. \ Glattli ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.085433 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 085433 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author D. G. \ Polyakov \ and\ author B. I. \ Shklovskii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3796 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 70 ,\ pages 3796 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  24. [32]

    author author L. A. \ Martinez , author G. Qiu , author P. Deng , author P. Zhang , author K. G. \ Ray , author L. Tai , author M.-T. \ Wei , author H. He , author K. L. \ Wang , author J. L. \ DuBois ,\ and\ author D.-X. \ Qu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.01308...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Jezouin , author F

    author author S. Jezouin , author F. D. \ Parmentier , author A. Anthore , author U. Gennser , author A. Cavanna , author Y. Jin ,\ and\ author F. Pierre ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241912 journal journal Science \ volume 342 ,\ pages 601 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    Le Breton , author R

    author author G. Le Breton , author R. Delagrange , author Y. Hong , author M. Garg , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author R. Ribeiro-Palau , author P. Roulleau , author P. Roche ,\ and\ author F. D. \ Parmentier ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.116803 j...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author G. M. \ Ferguson , author R. Xiao , author A. R. \ Richardella , author A. Kaczmarek , author N. Samarth ,\ and\ author K. C. \ Nowack ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02633 journal journal arXiv 2503.02633 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    author author R. M. \ Hill \ and\ author A. K. \ Jonscher ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(79)90064-4 journal journal Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids \ volume 32 ,\ pages 53 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  29. [37]

    author author I. T. \ Rosen , author M. P. \ Andersen , author L. K. \ Rodenbach , author L. Tai , author P. Zhang , author K. L. \ Wang , author M. A. \ Kastner ,\ and\ author D. Goldhaber-Gordon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.246602 journal journal Phys. Rev. Let...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author B. E. \ Saǧol , author G. Nachtwei , author K. Von Klitzing , author G. Hein ,\ and\ author K. Eberl ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.075305 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 66 ,\ pages 075305 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author N. G. \ Kalugin , author B. E. \ Saǧol , author A. Buß , author A. Hirsch , author C. Stellmach , author G. Hein ,\ and\ author G. Nachtwei ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.125313 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 68 ,\ pages 125313 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    Akera ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.78.023708 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 78 ,\ pages 023708 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    author author H. Akera ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.78.023708 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 78 ,\ pages 023708 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    Eaves \ and\ author F

    author author L. Eaves \ and\ author F. W. \ Sheard ,\ @noop journal journal Semiconductor Science and Technology \ volume 1 ,\ pages 346 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  34. [42]

    Yang , author H

    author author W. Yang , author H. Graef , author X. Lu , author G. Zhang , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author A. Bachtold , author E. H. T. \ Teo , author E. Baudin , author E. Bocquillon , author G. Feve , author J. M. \ Berroir , author D. Carpentier , author ...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Röper \ and\ author E

    author author T. Röper \ and\ author E. Bocquillon ,\ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15349704 10.5281/zenodo.15349704 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.