From Connectivity to Autonomy: The Dawn of Self-Evolving Communication Systems

Karim Djemame; Maryam Hafeez; Syed Ali Raza Zaidi; Syed Danial Ali Shah; Zeinab Nezami

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 34 references

From Connectivity to Autonomy: The Dawn of Self-Evolving Communication Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that 6G networks can be built as self-evolving systems by composing reconfigurable hardware, adaptive middleware, intelligent network functions, and collaborating AI agents into one stack.

desk verdict Vision paper with a useful architecture survey, but the load-bearing multi-agent real-time claim is asserted, not shown; acceptable only if repositioned as a roadmap. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23710 v1 pith:MULUCP7H submitted 2025-05-29 eess.SY cs.AIcs.DCcs.ETcs.SY

Zeinab Nezami , Syed Danial Ali Shah , Maryam Hafeez , Karim Djemame , Syed Ali Raza Zaidi This is my paper

classification eess.SYcs.AIcs.DCcs.ETcs.SY

keywords self-evolvingnetworks6Gmulti-agentsystemsO-RANautonomousnetworkmanagementreal-timedecision-makingintent-drivennetworkingself-x

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the next telecom generation, 6G, should not just connect devices but evolve on its own: perceive conditions, reason about them, and reconfigure network resources in real time without human commands. It proposes a unified technology stack with four cooperating layers, reconfigurable hardware, programmable middleware, intelligent network functions, and collaborating AI agents, and claims this stack turns autonomy from a slogan into an architecture. The payoff, if the vision holds, is lower latency, better resource efficiency, and self-healing behavior in industrial settings. The paper is a roadmap and position statement, supported by a working demonstration of an AI-orchestrated radio access controller that reaches nearly 99 percent service satisfaction for latency-sensitive traffic while sharing resources with AI workloads.

What carries the argument

The central object is the four-layer autonomous network stack illustrated in the paper's architecture diagram, with AI and telecom subsystems paired inside each layer. The load-bearing mechanism is the collaboration of distributed AI agents, whose decisions are coordinated by a behavioral adaptation engine, governed by policy enforcement, and open to human-agent interaction. That multi-agent loop is what converts lower-layer programmability and learning models into real-time self-optimization and self-healing.

What would settle it

Run the proposed multi-agent orchestration on an O-RAN testbed with a hard real-time industrial workload, inject sudden link or compute faults, and compare end-to-end latency and missed-deadline rate against a fixed-priority baseline; if the agent-coordinated system cannot sustain the latency bound or introduces oscillations, the central claim is disproved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a self-evolving communication system is achievable by composing four layers: a hardware layer of reconfigurable, AI-accelerated infrastructure; a middleware layer that makes the network programmable through software-defined networking, network function virtualization, and telemetry; a functionality layer that supplies continuous learning, digital twins, and cognitive memory; and a multi-agent layer in which distributed AI agents coordinate intent prediction, fault resolution, and traffic optimization in real time. Each layer pairs a telecom subsystem with an AI subsystem. The authors assert that this stack moves networks from static, reactive connectivity to autonomous, self-optimizing behavior, and they treat multi-agent collaboration as the key mechanism for autonomous network management.

Load-bearing premise

The whole vision depends on AI agents being able to make correct, safe, real-time decisions about network resources and faults, and the paper does not supply an experiment or formal safety argument for that.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Network operators could shift from manual configuration to intent-driven operation, where users state goals and the network reconfigures itself to satisfy them.
Industrial IoT and digital manufacturing could run latency-critical control loops over networks that allocate bandwidth and compute adaptively in real time.
Self-healing and predictive maintenance become built-in network functions, reducing downtime and manual fault resolution.
Standardization bodies would need to define interoperability and safety protocols for heterogeneous AI agents, not just radio interfaces.
The demonstrated AI-orchestrated RAN controller suggests that resource sharing between radio workloads and AI applications can be automated with high service satisfaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper leaves open whether the multi-agent layer outperforms a single-agent or static orchestrator; a direct benchmark under fault injection would test that claim.
The safety argument is asserted rather than demonstrated, so in high-stakes settings a human-in-the-loop fallback may be needed, which would partially soften the autonomy claim.
The open-endedness analogy to self-driving laboratories implies networks that invent new protocols, but the paper does not define how network-level novelty would be measured.
The architecture naturally suggests simulation-first training in digital twins before real-time deployment, an extension that could be tested on current O-RAN testbeds.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a vision paper, not a research paper, and the sooner it is treated as one the better. What it offers is a layered architecture for self-evolving 6G communication systems—hardware, middleware, intelligent functions, and multi-agent collaboration—wrapped around O-RAN, digital twins, LLMs, and federated learning. As a synthesis, it is competent: the figure is comprehensive, the structure is clear, and it cites the relevant standards bodies (O-RAN, ITU, IEEE, 3GPP). Someone entering this area would get a decent orientation from it.

What is new? Nothing technically. There is no algorithm, dataset, or measurement. The contribution is the framing and the roadmap. That is fine for a vision paper, but the paper occasionally forgets its own genre. The abstract says 'potential,' but Section II-D states that agents 'make data-driven decisions in real time' as though the system exists. The only evidence offered is the authors' prior work [32], a single-agent Soft Actor-Critic orchestrator for GPU allocation, which does not test multi-agent coordination, closed-loop fault handling, or open-ended evolution. The 'Behavioral Adaptation Engine' in that section is a label, not a mechanism; there is no description of how agents share state, arbitrate conflicts, or guarantee stability, and the stress-test concern about oscillating policies in O-RAN is real. The paper also has citation hygiene issues—[3] looks like a robotics paper cited for terrestrial-aerial-satellite systems, and a couple of references point to Fortune/Forbes articles.

I agree with the reader's conditional verdict. The paper is a plausible roadmap, but the load-bearing claim of real-time multi-agent autonomy is asserted, not established. The fix is straightforward: reposition it as a position statement, replace 'makes decisions' with 'envisioned to make decisions,' and add an explicit limitations paragraph acknowledging that no multi-agent evaluation exists. With that, it becomes a useful reference for the 6G community.

It deserves a serious referee because it condenses a substantial body of work and could be cited as a roadmap. Send it to peer review, but expect heavy revision. I would not cite it for any technical result, but I might cite it as an example of the self-evolving-network vision if I wrote a related survey.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a conceptual and architectural vision for "self-evolving communication systems" in 6G, organized as a four-layer stack: reconfigurable hardware, programmable middleware, intelligent network functions, and multi-agent collaboration. It discusses enabling technologies (O-RAN, ISAC, edge computing, LLMs, federated learning), applications in industrial IoT and smart cities, ethical and standardization challenges, and a technology-stack roadmap. The only concrete evaluation cited is the authors' prior work [32], a single-agent Soft Actor-Critic orchestrator for GPU allocation in an O-RAN Near-RT RIC. The paper is positioned as a bridge from theoretical concepts to practical deployment.

Significance. As a position paper, the manuscript usefully synthesizes a broad set of relevant topics and proposes a plausible layered architecture for AI-native 6G. Its strengths include the grounding in O-RAN concepts (xApps/rApps, RIC), the explicit discussion of standardization gaps in ITU-T FG AINN and IEEE CertifAIEd, and the honest enumeration of ethical and accountability issues. The prior implementation [32] provides a concrete, albeit partial, instantiation of a single architectural component. However, the paper is not an empirical or formal systems paper: it contains no measurements, no formal derivation, no code, and no external benchmarks. Its central claim that the proposed stack enables reliable real-time multi-agent autonomy is asserted rather than demonstrated. The value of the paper depends on accepting this assertion, so the scope and evidentiary language must be corrected before publication.

major comments (3)

[Section II-D] The load-bearing claim that "the multi-agent collaborative system is key to autonomous network management" and that agents "make data-driven decisions in real time" is asserted without supporting analysis. The section names a "Behavioral Adaptation Engine" but does not describe its mechanism, inputs, outputs, or interaction with other agents. No stability, convergence, or safety argument is provided for the closed control loop. In O-RAN, multiple agents share network state; without an explicit arbitration or shared-world-model mechanism, the joint policy could oscillate or violate latency constraints. This is central because if multi-agent real-time control is unreliable in industrial settings, the self-evolving network vision collapses. The authors should either provide a formal or simulation-based analysis of the multi-agent loop, or explicitly re-scope the paper as a vision/position paper that identifies this as an open research direction rather than a demonstrated capability.
[Section III-D] The passage on the prior implementation states that it "demonstrates how intelligent resource management can be achieved in real time on shared infrastructure" and that it "validat[es] the architecture presented in this paper." This is an overstatement. Reference [32] describes a single-agent Soft Actor-Critic orchestrator that allocates GPU resources between RAN and generative-AI workloads; it does not exercise multi-agent collaboration, the middleware layer, cognitive memory, open-ended learning, or closed-loop fault handling, all of which are central to the proposed architecture. The evidence therefore cannot validate the full architecture. Please soften the claim to "illustrates one component" and state which aspects of the architecture remain untested.
[Sections II-C and II-D] The architectural novelty is partly carried by components such as "Cognitive Memory" (II-C) and the "Behavioral Adaptation Engine" (II-D), but these are only named, not functionally specified. No algorithm, state representation, interface, or example behavior is provided. Without at least a minimal functional specification (e.g., what state is stored, how adaptation is triggered, how agent actions are reconciled), the multi-agent coordination claim is untestable and the comparison with prior self-evolving architectures is difficult to assess. Please add concrete definitions or clearly label these as placeholder concepts in a conceptual roadmap.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] The phrase "Our findings emphasize the potential" is inconsistent with a position paper that contains no measurements or formal results; consider replacing with "This paper argues" or "We discuss."
[Section II-A] The sentence "Telecom components at this layer mainly essential components such as router, edge servers, and IoT devices" is ungrammatical; add "include" before "essential."
[Section III-D] There is a formatting error in "such as , Google Anthos" — an extra space before the comma — and the same list would benefit from consistent comma use.
[Manuscript header] The line "Manuscript received April 19, 2021; revised August 16, 2021" appears to be a template artifact and is inconsistent with the 2025 arXiv posting; please correct or remove it.
[Acknowledgment] The funding statement is duplicated: it appears both as a footnote on the first page and again in the Acknowledgment section. Please keep only one instance.
[Section I] Reference [12] is cited to support ISAC and edge computing, but that reference concerns pushing LLMs to the 6G edge; it does not appear to be a source for ISAC. Please re-check the citation or replace it with an ISAC-specific reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper is a vision/position piece whose claims are architectural and programmatic, and the single self-citation is illustrative support rather than a substituted proof.

full rationale

This is a position/vision paper, not a derivation, so there is no equation chain or fitted-parameter loop to reduce. The central 'self-evolving communication system' claim is advanced by architectural argument (Section II, Figure 1) and by citations to external standards (O-RAN, 3GPP, ITU-T FG-AINN), prior self-evolution literature ([1], [2], [4], [5], [8], [9]), and established AI/network techniques. The only self-referential support is Section III-D's reference to the authors' prior work [32], used as a working example: 'In support of this vision, we have implemented and evaluated a dynamic orchestration framework in our prior work [32]... The system also exemplifies modular integration of AI agents into RAN, validating the architecture presented in this paper.' That prior result is an empirical, externally checkable claim (nearly 99% service satisfaction for RAN requests) with stated components, not a parameter fitted to the current paper's conclusion, and it is not the sole justification for the proposed architecture. No prediction is constructed from a fit, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to force a choice, and no existing result is merely renamed. The skeptical concern that multi-agent real-time autonomy is asserted without a stability or safety analysis is a correctness/evidence gap, not circularity under the required patterns. Hence score 0 with no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central vision relies on a set of domain assumptions about AI capability and safety in real-time networks. The paper does not provide free parameters because there are no data fits, but it does introduce named architectural components without independent evidence.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption AI systems can perceive, reason, and reconfigure network infrastructure in real time.
Stated in Section I and repeated throughout; no evidence is given for the capability or its latency bounds.
domain assumption Multi-agent collaboration improves network decision quality without instabilities or conflicts.
Section II-D asserts agents 'make data-driven decisions in real time'; no formal or experimental support is provided.
domain assumption Open-ended learning is a desirable and achievable property for networks.
Introduced in Section I via analogy to DeepMind and AI Scientists; treated as beneficial without a safety analysis.
domain assumption Human-in-the-loop oversight can coexist with autonomous real-time operation.
Sections I and III-A assume oversight remains compatible with self-evolution, but no concrete mechanism is specified.

invented entities (2)

Behavioral Adaptation Engine
purpose: Coordinates changes in agent actions in response to network conditions (Section II-D).
Named as a component without specification, API, or validation. No falsifiable handle is offered.
Cognitive Memory
purpose: Stores past decisions and refines future ones (Section II-C).
Described functionally but with no design or evaluation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Connectivity to Autonomy: The Dawn of Self-Evolving Communication Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MULUCP7H

@misc{pith2026250523710,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Connectivity to Autonomy: The Dawn of Self-Evolving Communication Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MULUCP7H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23710}
}

read the original abstract

This paper envisions 6G as a self-evolving telecom ecosystem, where AI-driven intelligence enables dynamic adaptation beyond static connectivity. We explore the key enablers of autonomous communication systems, spanning reconfigurable infrastructure, adaptive middleware, and intelligent network functions, alongside multi-agent collaboration for distributed decision-making. We explore how these methodologies align with emerging industrial IoT frameworks, ensuring seamless integration within digital manufacturing processes. Our findings emphasize the potential for improved real-time decision-making, optimizing efficiency, and reducing latency in networked control systems. The discussion addresses ethical challenges, research directions, and standardization efforts, concluding with a technology stack roadmap to guide future developments. By leveraging state-of-the-art 6G network management techniques, this research contributes to the next generation of intelligent automation solutions, bridging the gap between theoretical advancements and real-world industrial applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23710 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[32]

The interplay of ai-and-ran: Dynamic resource allocation for converged 6g platform,

S. D. A. Shah, Z. Nezami, M. Hafeez, and S. A. R. Zaidi, “The interplay of ai-and-ran: Dynamic resource allocation for converged 6g platform,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07420 , 2025

arXiv 2025
[3]

Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control,

J. Liang, W. Huang, F. Xia, P. Xu, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, P. Florence, and A. Zeng, “Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 9493–9500

2023
[1]

Chaoub, A

A. Chaoub, A. Mammel, P. Martinez-Julia, R. Chaparadza, M. Elko- tob, L. Ong, D. Krishnaswamy, A. Anttonen, and A. Dutta, “Hybrid self-organizing networks: Evolution, standardization trends, and a 6g architecture vision: submitted (is under review) to ieee magazine on standards for evolving and future networks,” May 31st, 2022

work page 2022
[2]

Self-evolving wireless communications: A novel intelligence trend for 6g and beyond,

L. Qian, P. Yang, G. Wu, W. Tang, and Z. Chen, “Self-evolving wireless communications: A novel intelligence trend for 6g and beyond,” in 2024 International Conference on Future Communications and Networks (FCN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

work page 2024
[4]

Self-evolving and trans- formative protocol architecture for 6g,

L. Cai, J. Pan, W. Yang, X. Ren, and X. Shen, “Self-evolving and trans- formative protocol architecture for 6g,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 178–186, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

The vision of self-evolving computing systems,

D. Weyns, T. B ¨ack, R. Vidal, X. Yao, and A. N. Belbachir, “The vision of self-evolving computing systems,” Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 351–367, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Neuro-symbolic ai for self-evolving signal processing in autonomous communication systems,

R. Kashikar, “Neuro-symbolic ai for self-evolving signal processing in autonomous communication systems,” in 2024 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Information Security (ICSPIS) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

work page 2024
[7]

Position: Open-endedness is essential for artificial superhuman intelligence,

E. Hughes, M. D. Dennis, J. Parker-Holder, F. Behbahani, A. Mavalankar, Y . Shi, T. Schaul, and T. Rockt ¨aschel, “Position: Open-endedness is essential for artificial superhuman intelligence,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , 2024

work page 2024

Show all 34 references

[8]

The framework of 6g self-evolving networks and the decision-making scheme for massive iot,

B. Liu, J. Luo, and X. Su, “The framework of 6g self-evolving networks and the decision-making scheme for massive iot,” Applied Sciences , vol. 11, no. 19, p. 9353, 2021

2021
[9]

Architecture for self-evolution of 6g core network based on intelligent decision making,

L. Lu, C. Liu, C. Zhang, Z. Hu, S. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Zhang, X. Liu, and J. Chen, “Architecture for self-evolution of 6g core network based on intelligent decision making,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 3255, 2023

2023
[10]

What do llms need to synthesize correct router configurations?

R. Mondal, A. Tang, R. Beckett, T. Millstein, and G. Varghese, “What do llms need to synthesize correct router configurations?” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 2023, pp. 189–195

2023
[11]

Large generative ai models for telecom: The next big thing?

L. Bariah, Q. Zhao, H. Zou, Y . Tian, F. Bader, and M. Debbah, “Large generative ai models for telecom: The next big thing?” IEEE Communications Magazine, 2024

2024
[12]

Pushing large language models to the 6g edge: Vision, challenges, and opportunities,

Z. Lin, G. Qu, Q. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Chen, and K. Huang, “Pushing large language models to the 6g edge: Vision, challenges, and opportunities,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16739 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[13]

Self-driving laboratories to autonomously navigate the protein fitness landscape,

J. T. Rapp, B. J. Bremer, and P. A. Romero, “Self-driving laboratories to autonomously navigate the protein fitness landscape,” Nature chemical engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 2024

2024
[14]

The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery,

C. Lu, C. Lu, R. T. Lange, J. Foerster, J. Clune, and D. Ha, “The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[15]

The vision of autonomic computing,

J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, “The vision of autonomic computing,” Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2003

2003
[16]

Ric: A ran intelligent controller platform for ai-enabled cellular networks,

B. Balasubramanian, E. S. Daniels, M. Hiltunen, R. Jana, K. Joshi, R. Sivaraj, T. X. Tran, and C. Wang, “Ric: A ran intelligent controller platform for ai-enabled cellular networks,” IEEE Internet Computing , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 7–17, 2021

2021
[17]

A design of mano system for cloud native infrastructure,

J. Lee and Y . Kim, “A design of mano system for cloud native infrastructure,” in 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2021, pp. 1336–1339

2021
[18]

Sustainable development goals,

United Nations, “Sustainable development goals,” 2015, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals

2015
[19]

General data protection regulation (gdpr),

European Union, “General data protection regulation (gdpr),” 2016, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://www.consilium. europa.eu/en/policies/data-protection-regulation/

2016
[20]

California consumer privacy act (ccpa),

State of California, “California consumer privacy act (ccpa),” 2018, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ ccpa

2018
[21]

Explainable ai in 6g o-ran: A tutorial and survey on architecture, use cases, challenges, and future research,

B. Brik, H. Chergui, L. Zanzi, F. Devoti, A. Ksentini, M. S. Siddiqui, X. Costa-P `erez, and C. Verikoukis, “Explainable ai in 6g o-ran: A tutorial and survey on architecture, use cases, challenges, and future research,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2024

2024
[22]

Gsm-symbolic: Understanding the limitations of mathematical reasoning in large language models,

I. Mirzadeh, K. Alizadeh, H. Shahrokhi, O. Tuzel, S. Bengio, and M. Farajtabar, “Gsm-symbolic: Understanding the limitations of mathematical reasoning in large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05229, 2024

2024 arXiv
[23]

V . Wadhwa. (2024, October) The next wave of ai won’t be driven by llms. here’s what investors should focus on instead. Accessed: 2025-01-02. [Online]. Available: https://fortune.com/2024/ 10/18/next-wave-ai-llms-investor-focus-tech/

2024
[24]

Cultural evolution of cooperation among llm agents,

A. Vallinder and E. Hughes, “Cultural evolution of cooperation among llm agents,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10270 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[25]

The next breakthrough in artificial intelligence: How quantum ai will reshape our world,

B. Marr, “The next breakthrough in artificial intelligence: How quantum ai will reshape our world,” Forbes, October 8 2024, accessed: 2025-01-28. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2024/10/08/ the-next-breakthrough-in-artificial-intelligence-how-quan...

2024
[26]

Focus group on artificial intelligence native for telecommunication networks (fg-ainn),

International Telecommunication Union, “Focus group on artificial intelligence native for telecommunication networks (fg-ainn),” 2024, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ainn/Pages/default.aspx

2024
[27]

Ai ethics certification,

IEEE, “Ai ethics certification,” 2025, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://engagestandards.ieee.org/ieeecertifaied.html

2025
[28]

Open neural network exchange (onnx),

ONNX, “Open neural network exchange (onnx),” 2025, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://onnx.ai/

2025
[29]

[Online]

Google Cloud, “Anthos,” 2025, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://cloud.google.com/anthos

2025
[30]

Aws iot greengrass,

Amazon Web Services, “Aws iot greengrass,” 2025, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/greengrass/

2025
[31]

Microsoft azure iot,

Microsoft, “Microsoft azure iot,” 2025, accessed: 2025-04-05. [Online]. Available: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/solutions/iot/

2025
[33]

Chakrabarty, S

B. Chakrabarty, S. R. Patil, S. Shingornikar, A. Kothekar, P. Mujumdar, S. Raut, D. Ukirde et al., Securing Data on Threat Detection by Using IBM Spectrum Scale and IBM QRadar: An Enhanced Cyber Resiliency Solution. IBM Redbooks, 2021

2021
[34]

Nvidia flare: Federated learning from simulation to real-world,

H. R. Roth, Y . Cheng, Y . Wen, I. Yang, Z. Xu, Y .-T. Hsieh, K. Kersten, A. Harouni, C. Zhao, K. Lu et al. , “Nvidia flare: Federated learning from simulation to real-world,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13291, 2022

2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [32]

The interplay of ai-and-ran: Dynamic resource allocation for converged 6g platform,

S. D. A. Shah, Z. Nezami, M. Hafeez, and S. A. R. Zaidi, “The interplay of ai-and-ran: Dynamic resource allocation for converged 6g platform,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07420 , 2025

arXiv 2025

[2] [3]

Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control,

J. Liang, W. Huang, F. Xia, P. Xu, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, P. Florence, and A. Zeng, “Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 9493–9500

2023

[3] [1]

Chaoub, A

A. Chaoub, A. Mammel, P. Martinez-Julia, R. Chaparadza, M. Elko- tob, L. Ong, D. Krishnaswamy, A. Anttonen, and A. Dutta, “Hybrid self-organizing networks: Evolution, standardization trends, and a 6g architecture vision: submitted (is under review) to ieee magazine on standards for evolving and future networks,” May 31st, 2022

work page 2022

[4] [2]

Self-evolving wireless communications: A novel intelligence trend for 6g and beyond,

L. Qian, P. Yang, G. Wu, W. Tang, and Z. Chen, “Self-evolving wireless communications: A novel intelligence trend for 6g and beyond,” in 2024 International Conference on Future Communications and Networks (FCN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

work page 2024

[5] [4]

Self-evolving and trans- formative protocol architecture for 6g,

L. Cai, J. Pan, W. Yang, X. Ren, and X. Shen, “Self-evolving and trans- formative protocol architecture for 6g,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 178–186, 2022

work page 2022

[6] [5]

The vision of self-evolving computing systems,

D. Weyns, T. B ¨ack, R. Vidal, X. Yao, and A. N. Belbachir, “The vision of self-evolving computing systems,” Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 351–367, 2023

work page 2023

[7] [6]

Neuro-symbolic ai for self-evolving signal processing in autonomous communication systems,

R. Kashikar, “Neuro-symbolic ai for self-evolving signal processing in autonomous communication systems,” in 2024 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Information Security (ICSPIS) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

work page 2024

[8] [7]

Position: Open-endedness is essential for artificial superhuman intelligence,

E. Hughes, M. D. Dennis, J. Parker-Holder, F. Behbahani, A. Mavalankar, Y . Shi, T. Schaul, and T. Rockt ¨aschel, “Position: Open-endedness is essential for artificial superhuman intelligence,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , 2024

work page 2024