Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 116 references

Computerized Modeling of Electrophysiology and Pathoelectrophysiology of the Atria -- How Much Detail is Needed?

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review concludes that reliable atrial ablation planning requires personalized biatrial models with fiber direction, anisotropic conduction, and realistic refractory-period data.

desk verdict A solid, honest review of atrial model complexity that overstates its own summary recommendation relative to the evidence it cites. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23717 v1 pith:E2R73NG5 submitted 2025-05-29 physics.comp-ph cs.CE

Olaf Dössel , Axel Loewe This is my paper
classification physics.comp-phcs.CE
keywords atrialfibrillationcomputationalelectrophysiologyablationplanningmodelcomplexityeikonalbiatrialmodelingfibrosisconductionvelocityrestitution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review asks how much anatomical and electrophysiological detail a computer model of the human atria needs in order to be trustworthy for a specific intended use, here the planning and optimization of ablation for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. It argues that the answer is context-dependent, and that for ablation planning the assembled simulation and clinical mapping evidence points to a definite minimum: a personalized volumetric or bilayer model of both atria, rule-based fiber direction with anisotropic conduction velocity, and realistic estimates of remodeling, conduction-velocity restitution, and regional effective refractory period. It also argues that single-surface isotropic models and simple fibrotic-versus-healthy tissue classifications are insufficient, and that extended eikonal models can simulate reentrant arrhythmias at a fraction of the computational cost of full reaction-diffusion models. If this prescription is correct, it converts an abstract debate about model complexity into a concrete checklist and indicates which patient-specific measurements are worth collecting.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by several linked objects. The 'context of use' is the criterion that decides how much detail is needed, and here it is ablation planning. The bilayer model, a two-surface representation of the atrial wall that can hold different endocardial and epicardial fiber directions, is the recommended geometric compromise, with full volumetric three-dimensional models as the more expensive alternative. Rule-based fiber fields supply anisotropy without requiring patient-specific diffusion-tensor imaging. Anisotropic conduction velocity with its restitution and regional effective refractory period are the physiological properties identified as indispensable for reentry. The extended eikonal approach, including the reaction-eikonal and DREAM variants, provides the fast solver that can simulate reentrant arrhythmias several hundred times faster than reaction-diffusion models. The PEERP protocol is the suggested standardized measure of arrhythmia vulnerability that makes competing ablation strategies quantitatively comparable.

What would settle it

A prospective trial in which patients are randomized to ablation guided by a recommended-detail personalized model versus standard clinical practice; if post-ablation recurrence rates are statistically indistinguishable, the added model complexity is not clinically decisive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the level of detail in atrial electrophysiology models must be matched to the intended use, and that for ablation planning the minimum viable model is a personalized three-dimensional or bilayer representation of both atria with rule-based fiber architecture, anisotropic conduction velocity, and patient-specific estimates of remodeling, conduction-velocity restitution, and effective refractory period. The review supports the claim by surveying comparisons of biatrial with left-atrial-only models, volumetric with bilayer and single-surface geometries, bidomain/monodomain with eikonal formulations, and different ways of representing fibrosis. It reports concrete quantitative consequences, such as omitting ablation lines that connect to the nearest orifice lowering simulated success by about 20 percent, and imprecise fibrosis localization lowering it by about 35 percent. It also motivates a standardized in silico vulnerability protocol, PEERP (pacing at the end of the effective refractory period), which can interrogate hundreds of sites that could never be tested in a patient.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in silico measurements of how easily an atrium sustains atrial fibrillation, and of whether an ablation plan stops it, predict the real clinical outcome for patients.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Biatrial models should become the default for in silico vulnerability assessment, because the studies reviewed here show that including the right atrium can unmask additional inducing points in the left atrium.
  • For identifying fibrotic substrate, electrophysiological measurements such as voltage, conduction velocity, and restitution should be weighted more heavily than late gadolinium enhancement MRI, since the two modalities often locate the substrate differently.
  • Fast extended eikonal models make it practical to test hundreds of stimulation sites per virtual patient, so arrhythmia vulnerability can be checked before and after an ablation plan at a cost that full reaction-diffusion simulations cannot afford.
  • Ablation strategies should connect high-dominant-frequency ablation sites to the nearest orifice; the reviewed simulations find that omitting these connections lowers success by about 20 percent, and using the wrong fibrosis modality lowers it by about 35 percent.
  • Cohort simulations built from statistical shape models can generate thousands of virtual patients, which is how the review proposes to train machine-learning tools such as estimating fibrosis class from the 12-lead ECG.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct clinical test the review does not run would randomize patients to ablation targets from a recommended-detail personalized model versus conventional pulmonary-vein isolation and compare atrial fibrillation recurrence; the recommended checklist stands or falls on that comparison.
  • If in silico vulnerability transfers to the clinic, the PEERP protocol could become a pre-ablation screening that finds latent triggers months before they manifest; that use is an extrapolation beyond the validation the review reports.
  • The same context-of-use logic could be run in reverse for cohort studies: when the question is population-level risk rather than an individual ablation plan, cheaper monolayer or purely eikonal models may be adequate, an option the review leaves only partially explored.
  • The review's 30-60 percent window of dangerous fibrosis suggests a testable prediction: clinical ablation outcome should depend on the fraction of moderately fibrotic tissue rather than total scar burden, which a retrospective imaging-outcome analysis could check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review addresses the question of how much model detail is needed in computerized atrial electrophysiology simulations, with the stated intended use of planning and optimizing atrial ablation. It surveys cellular models, anatomical and fiber-orientation modeling, single-surface/bilayer/3D representations, propagation models from bidomain to eikonal, fibrosis modeling, verification and validation, in silico vulnerability assessment, personalization, cohort modeling, and ablation-strategy simulation. The authors conclude that for reliable ablation planning one needs a personalized 3D or bilayer atrial model with rule-based fiber direction, anisotropic conduction velocity, realistic remodeling, CV restitution, and regional effective refractory period, and they emphasize that models must pass clinical validation before use. The paper is a narrative synthesis rather than a new derivation, and it explicitly acknowledges several open questions.

Significance. If the recommendation package were established, it would provide a practical checklist for modelers and a target for clinical translation. The review has real strengths: it ties model choices to a specific context of use, it highlights the need for systematic verification and validation, it reports the PEERP protocol and the large-cohort ECG simulation efforts, and it is transparent about the current lack of clinical validation. The main caveat is that the central recommendation is an expert synthesis based largely on in silico surrogate endpoints (e.g., PEERP-based vulnerability and virtual ablation success) rather than on prospective clinical outcome data; the authors themselves state that the models must pass clinical validation before clinical use. The review would be more convincing if it labeled the summary package as a working hypothesis and more sharply separated established evidence from expert judgment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 10 vs. Section 3.4] Section 10 states that "for reliable ablation planning, we need a personalized 3D model or a bilayer model of the atria," but Section 3.4 explicitly leaves open "the question whether they [single-surface models] are suitable for in silico AFib vulnerability assessment." The manuscript does not provide evidence that single-surface models fail for the ablation-planning context, so the summary recommendation is stronger than the body of the review supports. Please either present the dimensional-model requirement as a research need or cite the specific studies that establish inferiority of single-surface models for this intended use.
  2. [Sections 6.1, 9 and 10] The central claim in Section 10 rests on in silico vulnerability surrogates: Section 6.1 describes the PEERP-based vulnerability metric (Azzolin et al. 2021), and Section 9 describes virtual ablation outcomes as vulnerability reduction in 29 patients (Azzolin et al. 2023), not patient-level arrhythmia recurrence. Because the review itself states in Section 10 that computational models "must pass clinical validation" before clinical use, the phrase "for reliable ablation planning" overstates the evidence. Please rephrase the conclusion to make explicit that the recommended package is a hypothesis that still requires prospective clinical validation with patient outcomes.
  3. [Section 4.2] Section 4.2 asserts that "the most dangerous degree of fibrosis is between 30% and 60%." This is presented as a general conclusion, but the preceding text derives it from Keller et al.'s simulations of replacement fibrosis and from percolation-based modeling of fibrotic tissue; the evidence base does not appear to cover different fibrosis patterns, transmural extents, and patient-specific geometry. Given that this claim is used to argue against binary LGE-MRI fibrosis classification, please qualify it as model-based and pattern-dependent or provide a more systematic evidentiary basis.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sections 7 and 8] Section 7 and Section 8 contain a figure-numbering inconsistency: Section 7 refers to "Figure 5" for the comparison of LGE-MRI, voltage, and conduction velocity, but the caption is numbered Fig. 4, and Section 8 then uses "Figure 5" for the P-wave fibrosis estimation figure. Please renumber the figures consistently.
  2. [Section 6.1] The sentence listing the pacing protocols contains a duplicated "(RP)" after "rapid pacing from 227 points," and the fibrosis labels "H2, H3, H4 UII and UIV" are not explained in the text; please clarify.
  3. [Reference [38]] Reference [38] is cited as "Groot et al." in the text; the correct name is "de Groot et al.".
  4. [Section 3] In the paragraph on the universal atrial coordinate system, the text contains the typo "Roney at al." instead of "Roney et al.".
  5. [Reference [36]] Reference [36] lists an author as "Prof. Schmidt, C."; academic titles should be removed from the author list.
  6. [Sections 4.3 and 8] The DREAM model and the cyclic fast iterative method are cited partly to preprint/conference items ([10,28]); if peer-reviewed versions are available, please cite those instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's recommended model detail is a synthesis of simulation studies with external support, and the unvalidated link to clinical outcome is a limitation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

This paper is a narrative review rather than a derivation, so the standard circularity patterns (self-definitional metrics, fitted inputs called predictions, imported uniqueness theorems, ansatz smuggled via citation) do not apply. The Summary prescription that reliable ablation planning needs personalized 3D or bilayer geometry, rule-based fiber direction, anisotropic conduction velocity, remodeling, CV restitution, and regional ERP is presented as a synthesis of prior modeling studies from the authors' group and from external groups such as Roney, Trayanova, and Boyle. The closest concern is the PEERP-based in silico vulnerability metric used to compare ablation strategies: the review itself acknowledges that this is a surrogate endpoint and that the models 'must pass clinical validation' before clinical use (Section 10). That is an explicit validation gap and a correctness risk, not a case where the conclusion is true by construction or where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Frequent self-citations are present, but the load-bearing claims about model complexity are not reduced to those self-citations alone; independent modeling groups and clinical electrophysiology measurements (e.g., Nothstein et al. for CV restitution) provide external evidence. No equation or protocol in the paper defines its central recommendation in terms of the recommendation itself, so no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review; it introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its conclusions rest on domain assumptions about the validity of the bidomain model, the transferability of in silico metrics to clinical outcomes, and the generalizability of specific empirical findings, all acknowledged as needing further validation.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The bidomain equations are the basis for most tissue level models of cardiac electrophysiology.
    Section 4 introduces the bidomain equations as the most detailed model; the entire discussion of model fidelity assumes these equations capture the relevant physics.
  • domain assumption In silico metrics of atrial fibrillation vulnerability and ablation success are meaningful proxies for clinical outcome in ablation planning.
    The review frames its recommendations around the intended use of ablation planning; this assumption is load-bearing and is acknowledged as requiring clinical validation in Sections 5 and 10.
  • domain assumption The empirical fibrosis thresholds (30-60% as dangerous) from specific studies generalize across patients and conditions.
    Section 4.2 relies on Keller et al. and Vigmond et al. for the nonlinear arrhythmogenicity of fibrosis, and this underpins later claims about fibrosis modeling and LGE-MRI limitations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Computerized Modeling of Electrophysiology and Pathoelectrophysiology of the Atria -- How Much Detail is Needed?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E2R73NG5

@misc{pith2026250523717,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Computerized Modeling of Electrophysiology and Pathoelectrophysiology of the Atria -- How Much Detail is Needed?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E2R73NG5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23717}
}
read the original abstract

This review focuses on the computerized modeling of the electrophysiology of the human atria, emphasizing the simulation of common arrhythmias such as atrial flutter (AFlut) and atrial fibrillation (AFib). Which components of the model are necessary to accurately model arrhythmogenic tissue modifications, including remodeling, cardiomyopathy, and fibrosis, to ensure reliable simulations? The central question explored is the level of detail required for trustworthy simulations for a specific context of use. The review discusses the balance between model complexity and computational efficiency, highlighting the risks of oversimplification and excessive detail. It covers various aspects of atrial modeling, from cellular to whole atria levels, including the influence of atrial geometry, fiber direction, anisotropy, and wall thickness on simulation outcomes. The article also examines the impact of different modeling approaches, such as volumetric 3D models, bilayer models, and single surface models, on the realism of simulations. In addition, it reviews the latest advances in the modeling of fibrotic tissue and the verification and validation of atrial models. The intended use of these models in planning and optimization of atrial ablation strategies is discussed, with a focus on personalized modeling for individual patients and cohort-based approaches for broader applications. The review concludes by emphasizing the importance of integrating experimental data and clinical validation to enhance the utility of computerized atrial models to improve patient outcomes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    npj Digital Medicine2(1) (2019)

    Alber, M., Buganza Tepole, A., Cannon, W.R., De, S., Dura-Bernal, S., Garikipati, K., Kar- niadakis, G., Lytton, W.W., Perdikaris, P., Petzold, L., Kuhl, E.: Integrating machine learn- ing and multiscale modeling—perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences. npj Digital Medicine2(1) (2019). DOI 10.1038...

    doi:10.1038/s41746- 2019

  2. [2]

    Frontiers in Physiology 9, 1251 (2018)

    Alessandrini, M., Valinoti, M., Unger, L., Oesterlein, T., D ¨ossel, O., Corsi, C., Loewe, A., Severi, S.: A computational framework to benchmark basket catheter guided ablation in atrial fibrillation. Frontiers in Physiology 9, 1251 (2018). DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01251

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Biophys J 121(22), 4247–4259 (2022)

    Amsaleg, A., S ´anchez, J., Mikut, R., Loewe, A.: Characterization of the pace-and-drive capacity of the human sinoatrial node: A 3d in silico study. Biophys J 121(22), 4247–4259 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.10.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2022.10.020 2022

  4. [4]

    Appel, S., Gerach, T., Krauß, J., Loewe, A.: Potential role of stretch-activated channels in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. In: P. Nithiarasu, R. L ¨ohner (eds.) 8th International Conference on Computational and Mathematical Biomedical Engineering - CMBE2024, vol. 8, pp. 468–471. Computational and Scientific Consultancy Services (2024). URL http...

    2024

  5. [5]

    conventional ablation strategies to termi- nate atrial fibrillation and prevent recurrence

    Azzolin, L., Eichenlaub, M., Nagel, C., Nairn, D., Sanchez, J., Unger, L., D ¨ossel, O., Ja- didi, A., Loewe, A.: Personalized ablation vs. conventional ablation strategies to termi- nate atrial fibrillation and prevent recurrence. Europace 25(1), 211–222 (2023). DOI 10.1093/europace/euac116

    work page doi:10.1093/europace/euac116 2023

  6. [6]

    Comput Med Imaging Graph 108, 102265–102265 (2023)

    Azzolin, L., Eichenlaub, M., Nagel, C., Nairn, D., S ´anchez, J., Unger, L., Arentz, T., West- ermann, D., D ¨ossel, O., Jadidi, A., Loewe, A.: Augmenta: Patient-specific augmented atrial model generation tool. Comput Med Imaging Graph 108, 102265–102265 (2023). DOI 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102265

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC) (2020)

    Azzolin, L., Luongo, G., Rocher, S., Saiz, J., Doessel, O., Loewe, A.: Influence of gradient and smoothness of atrial wall thickness on initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation. In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC) (2020). DOI 10.22489/CinC.2020.261

    work page doi:10.22489/cinc.2020.261 2020

  8. [8]

    In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), vol

    Azzolin, L., Nagel, C., Nairn, D., Sanchez, J., Zheng, T., Eichenlaub, M., Jadidi, A., Doessel, O., Loewe, A.: Automated framework for the augmentation of missing anatomical structures and generation of personalized atrial models from clinical data. In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), vol. 48 (2021). DOI 10.23919/CinC53138.2021.9662846

    arXiv 2021

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    Front Physiol 12, 656411 (2021)

    Azzolin, L., Schuler, S., D ¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: A reproducible protocol to assess arrhythmia vulnerability : Pacing at the end of the effective refractory period. Front Physiol 12, 656411 (2021). DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.656411

    2021

  2. [10]

    In: 2022 18 Olaf D ¨ossel and Axel Loewe Computing in Cardiology Conference, vol

    Barrios Espinosa, C.A., S ´anchez, J., Doessel, O., Loewe, A.: Diffusion reaction eikonal alternant model: Towards fast simulations of complex cardiac arrhythmias. In: 2022 18 Olaf D ¨ossel and Axel Loewe Computing in Cardiology Conference, vol. 49. Computing in Cardiology (20...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Front Physiol 7, 108 (2016)

    Bayer, J.D., Roney, C.H., Pashaei, A., Ja¨ıs, P., Vigmond, E.J.: Novel radiofrequency ablation strategies for terminating atrial fibrillation in the left atrium: a simulation study. Front Physiol 7, 108 (2016). DOI 10.3389/fphys.2016.00108

    2016

  4. [12]

    In: 2024 Computing in Cardiology Conference, vol

    Becker, S., Alberto Barrios Espinosa, C., Anna Unger, L., Loewe, A.: Influence of conduction velocity restitution steepness on atrial fibrillation vulnerability and maintenance. In: 2024 Computing in Cardiology Conference, vol. 51. Computing in Cardiology (2024). DOI 10.22489/...

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Petersen, S., Slabaugh, G., Mathur, A., H

    Bevis, L., Biniam Misghina, S., Rauseo, E., Edgar Lopez Barrera, C., Plank, G., Vigmond, E., Loewe, A., Karabelas, E., Alonso Solis-Lemus, J., Niederer, S., E. Petersen, S., Slabaugh, G., Mathur, A., H. Roney, C.: Development of a user-friendly pipeline for constructing atrial...

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Europace 26(12) (2024)

    Bhagirath, P., Strocchi, M., Bishop, M.J., Boyle, P.M., Plank, G.: From bits to bedside: entering the age of digital twins in cardiac electrophysiology. Europace 26(12) (2024). DOI 10.1093/europace/euae295

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Journal of the American Heart Association 12(16) (2023)

    Bifulco, S.F., Macheret, F., Scott, G.D., Akoum, N., Boyle, P.M.: Explainable machine learn- ing to predict anchored reentry substrate created by persistent atrial fibrillation ablation in computational models. Journal of the American Heart Association 12(16) (2023). DOI 10.11...

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Nat Biomed Eng 3(11), 870–879 (2019)

    Boyle, P.M., Zghaib, T., Zahid, S., Ali, R.L., Deng, D., Franceschi, W.H., Hakim, J.B., Murphy, M.J., Prakosa, A., Zimmerman, S.L., Ashikaga, H., Marine, J.E., Kolandaivelu, A., Nazarian, S., Spragg, D.D., Calkins, H., Trayanova, N.A.: Computationally guided personalized targe...

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Medical Image Analysis 80, 102483 (2022)

    Campos, F.O., Neic, A., Mendonca Costa, C., Whitaker, J., O’Neill, M., Razavi, R., Rinaldi, C.A., DanielScherr, Niederer, S.A., Plank, G., Bishop, M.J.: An automated near-real time computational method for induction and treatment of scar-related ventricular tachycardias. Medic...

    2022

  10. [18]

    The Journal of Physiology 255(2), 335–346 (1976)

    Clerc, L.: Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. The Journal of Physiology 255(2), 335–346 (1976). DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011283

    1976 doi

  11. [19]

    Front Cardiovasc Med 10, 1121517–1121517 (2023)

    Cluitmans, M.J.M., Bayer, J., Bear, L.R., Ter Bekke, R.M.A., Heijman, J., Coronel, R., Volders, P.G.A.: The circle of reentry: Characteristics of trigger-substrate interaction lead- ing to sudden cardiac arrest. Front Cardiovasc Med 10, 1121517–1121517 (2023). DOI 10.3389/fcvm...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie (2024)

    Cluitmans, M.J.M., Plank, G., Heijman, J.: Digital twins for cardiac electrophysiology: state of the art and future challenges. Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie (2024). DOI 10.1007/s00399-024-01014-0

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Computers in Biology and Medicine p

    Corrado, C., Roney, C.H., Razeghi, O., Lemus, J.A.S., Coveney, S., Sim, I., Williams, S.E., O’Neill, M.D., Wilkinson, R.D., Clayton, R.H., Niederer, S.A.: Quantifying the impact of shape uncertainty on predicted arrhythmias. Computers in Biology and Medicine p. 106528 (2023). ...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (2022)

    Coveney, S., Cantwell, C., Roney, C.: Atrial conduction velocity mapping: clinical tools, algorithms and approaches for understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (2022). DOI 10.1007/s11517-022-02621-0

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Europace 26(6) (2024)

    Das ´ı, A., Nagel, C., Pope, M.T.B., Wijesurendra, R.S., Betts, T.R., Sachetto, R., Loewe, A., Bueno-Orovio, A., Rodriguez, B.: In silico trials guide optimal stratification of atrial fibrillation patients to catheter ablation and pharmacological medication: the i-stratificati...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    The Journal of Physiology (2023)

    Das ´ı, A., Pope, M.T., Wijesurendra, R.S., Betts, T.R., Sachetto, R., Bueno-Orovio, A., Ro- driguez, B.: What determines the optimal pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation? Computerized Modeling of the Atria 19 insights from ¡i¿in silico¡/i¿ trials in 800 virtual at...

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Nature 427(6972), 297–297 (2004)

    Dyson, F.: A meeting with enrico fermi. Nature 427(6972), 297–297 (2004). DOI 10.1038/427297a

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    MBEC 50(8), 773–799 (2012)

    D ¨ossel, O., Krueger, M.W., Weber, F.M., Wilhelms, M., Seemann, G.: Computational mod- eling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology. MBEC 50(8), 773–799 (2012). DOI 10.1007/s11517-012-0924-6

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    Hearts 2(3), 350–368 (2021)

    D ¨ossel, O., Luongo, G., Nagel, C., Loewe, A.: Computer modeling of the heart for ecg interpretation—a review. Hearts 2(3), 350–368 (2021). DOI 10.3390/hearts2030028

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    eprint (2024)

    Espinosa, C.B., S ´anchez, J., Appel, S., Becker, S., Krauß, J., D´ıaz, P.M., Unger, L., Houillon, M., Loewe, A.: A cyclical fast iterative method for simulating reentries in cardiac electro- physiology using an eikonal-based model. eprint (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Med Image Anal 47, 180–190 (2018)

    Fastl, T.E., Tobon-Gomez, C., Crozier, A., Whitaker, J., Rajani, R., McCarthy, K.P., Sanchez- Quintana, D., Ho, S.Y., O’Neill, M.D., Plank, G., Bishop, M.J., Niederer, S.A.: Personalized computational modeling of left atrial geometry and transmural myofiber architecture. Med I...

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    PLOS Computational Biology 18(10), e1010541 (2022)

    Galappaththige, S., Gray, R.A., Costa, C.M., Niederer, S., Pathmanathan, P.: Credibility assessment of patient-specific computational modeling using patient-specific cardiac mod- eling as an exemplar. PLOS Computational Biology 18(10), e1010541 (2022). DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010541

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    eprint (2024)

    Gander, L., Krause, R., Costabal, F.S., Pezzuto, S.: An eikonal model with re-excitability for fast simulations in cardiac electrophysiology. eprint (2024)

    2024

  24. [33]

    Sci Data10(1), 531–531 (2023)

    Gillette, K., Gsell, M.A.F., Nagel, C., Bender, J., Winkler, B., Williams, S.E., B ¨ar, M., Sch¨affter, T., D¨ossel, O., Plank, G., Loewe, A.: Medalcare-xl: 16,900 healthy and pathological synthetic 12 lead ecgs from electrophysiological simulations. Sci Data10(1), 531–531 (20...

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    Goette, A., Corradi, D., Dobrev, D., Aguinaga, L., Cabrera, J.A., Chugh, S.S., de Groot, J.R., Soulat-Dufour, L., Fenelon, G., Hatem, S.N., Jalife, J., Lin, Y.J., Lip, G.Y.H., Marcus, G.M., Murray, K.T., Pak, H.N., Schotten, U., Takahashi, N., Yamaguchi, T., Zoghbi, W.A., Natt...

    2024

  26. [35]

    Europace 26(9) (2024)

    Goette, A., Corradi, D., Dobrev, D., Aguinaga, L., Cabrera, J.A., Chugh, S.S., de Groot, J.R., Soulat-Dufour, L., Fenelon, G., Hatem, S.N., Jalife, J., Lin, Y.J., Lip, G.Y.H., Marcus, G.M., Murray, K.T., Pak, H.N., Schotten, U., Takahashi, N., Yamaguchi, T., Zoghbi, W.A., Natt...

    2024

  27. [36]

    Schmidt, C., Loewe, A.: Divaid: Automatic division of bi-atrial geometries into clinically important regions

    Goetz, C., Martinez Diaz, P., Althoff, T., Prof. Schmidt, C., Loewe, A.: Divaid: Automatic division of bi-atrial geometries into clinically important regions. In: 2024 Computing in Car- diology Conference, vol. 51. Computing in Cardiology (2024). DOI 10.22489/cinc.2024.316. UR...

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 9(5), e003648 (2016)

    de Groot, N., van der Does, L., Yaksh, A., Lanters, E., Teuwen, C., Knops, P., van de Woestijne, P., Bekkers, J., Kik, C., Bogers, A., Allessie, M.: Direct proof of endo-epicardial asynchrony of the atrial wall during atrial fibrillation in humans. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol...

    2016

  29. [38]

    EP Europace (2021)

    de Groot, N.M.S., Shah, D., Boyle, P.M., Anter, E., Clifford, G.D., Deisenhofer, I., Deneke, T., van Dessel, P., Doessel, O., Dilaveris, P., Heinzel, F.R., Kapa, S., Lambiase, P.D., Lumens, 20 Olaf D ¨ossel and Axel Loewe J., Platonov, P.G., Ngarmukos, T., Martinez, J.P., Sanc...

    2021

  30. [39]

    Cardiovascular Research 117(7), 1682–1699 (2021)

    Heijman, J., Sutanto, H., Crijns, H.J.G.M., Nattel, S., Trayanova, N.A.: Computational models of atrial fibrillation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives for improving clinical care. Cardiovascular Research 117(7), 1682–1699 (2021). DOI 10.1093/cvr/cvab138

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    Clin Anat 22(1), 52–63 (2009)

    Ho, S.Y., Sanchez-Quintana, D.: The importance of atrial structure and fibers. Clin Anat 22(1), 52–63 (2009). DOI 10.1002/ca.20634

    2009 doi

  32. [41]

    Sci Rep 10(1), 9147 (2020)

    Jadidi, A., Nothstein, M., Chen, J., Lehrmann, H., D ¨ossel, O., Allgeier, J., Trenk, D., Neu- mann, F.J., Loewe, A., M¨ uller-Edenborn, B., Arentz, T.: Specific electrogram characteristics identify the extra-pulmonary vein arrhythmogenic sources of persistent atrial fibrillat...

    2020 doi

  33. [42]

    Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review13 (2024)

    Jaffery, O.A., Melki, L., Slabaugh, G., Good, W.W., Roney, C.H.: A review of personalised cardiac computational modelling using electroanatomical mapping data. Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review13 (2024). DOI 10.15420/aer.2023.25

    2024 doi

  34. [43]

    Heart Rhythm O2 (2021)

    Jia, S., Nivet, H., Harrison, J., Pennec, X., Camaioni, C., Ja ¨ıs, P., Cochet, H., Sermesant, M.: Left atrial shape is independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ab- lation for atrial fibrillation: A shape statistics study. Heart Rhythm O2 (2021). DOI 10.10...

    2021 doi

  35. [44]

    In: Computing in Cardiology (2013)

    Keller, M.W., Luik, A., Abady, M., Seemann, G., Schmitt, C., D ¨ossel, O.: Influence of three-dimensional fibrotic patterns on simulated intracardiac electrogram morphology. In: Computing in Cardiology (2013)

    2013

  36. [45]

    Biomed Res Int 2015, 731386 (2015)

    Kharche, S.R., Biktasheva, I.V., Seemann, G., Zhang, H., Biktashev, V.N.: A computer sim- ulation study of anatomy induced drift of spiral waves in the human atrium. Biomed Res Int 2015, 731386 (2015). DOI 10.1155/2015/731386

    2015 doi

  37. [46]

    Front Pharmacol 11, 516 (2020)

    Kohajda, Z., Loewe, A., T ´oth, N., Varr ´o, A., Nagy, N.: The cardiac pacemaker story- fundamental role of the na/ca exchanger in spontaneous automaticity. Front Pharmacol 11, 516 (2020). DOI 10.3389/fphar.2020.00516

    2020

  38. [47]

    Med Biol Eng Comput 51(10), 1105–1119 (2013)

    Krueger, M.W., Dorn, A., Keller, D.U.J., Holmqvist, F., Carlson, J., Platonov, P.G., Rhode, K.S., Razavi, R., Seemann, G., D ¨ossel, O.: In-silico modeling of atrial repolarization in normal and atrial fibrillation remodeled state. Med Biol Eng Comput 51(10), 1105–1119 (2013)....

    2013 doi

  39. [48]

    Krueger, M.W., Schmidt, V., Tob´on, C., Weber, F.M., Lorenz, C., Keller, D.U.J., Barschdorf, H., Burdumy, M., Neher, P., Plank, G., Rhode, K., Seemann, G., Sanchez-Quintana, D., Saiz, J., Razavi, R., D ¨ossel, O.: Modeling atrial fiber orientation in patient-specific geometrie...

    2011 doi

  40. [49]

    IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(1), 73–84 (2013)

    Krueger, M.W., Seemann, G., Rhode, K., Keller, D.U.J., Schilling, C., Arujuna, A., Gill, J., O’Neill, M.D., Razavi, R., D¨ossel, O.: Personalization of atrial anatomy and electrophysiology as a basis for clinical modeling of radio-frequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. IEE...

    2013

  41. [50]

    International Journal of Arrhythmia 22(1) (2021)

    Kwon, O.S., Hwang, I., Pak, H.N.: Computational modeling of atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Arrhythmia 22(1) (2021). DOI 10.1186/s42444-021-00051-x

    2021 doi

  42. [51]

    Europace16 Suppl 4, iv21–iv29 (2014)

    Labarthe, S., Bayer, J., Coudiere, Y., Henry, J., Cochet, H., Jais, P., Vigmond, E.: A bilayer model of human atria: mathematical background, construction, and assessment. Europace16 Suppl 4, iv21–iv29 (2014). DOI 10.1093/europace/euu256 Computerized Modeling of the Atria 21

    2014 doi

  43. [52]

    bioRxiv (2024)

    Linder, M., Stary, T., Bitay, G., Nagy, N., Loewe, A.: Sympathetic stimulation can compensate for hypocalcaemia-induced bradycardia in human and rabbit sinoatrial node cells. bioRxiv (2024). DOI 10.1101/2024.08.30.610432

    2024 doi

  44. [53]

    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng pp

    Lindner, L.P., Gerach, T., Jahnke, T., Loewe, A., Weiss, D., Wieners, C.: Efficient time splitting schemes for the monodomain equation in cardiac electrophysiology. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng pp. e3666–e3666 (2022). DOI 10.1002/cnm.3666

    2022 doi

  45. [54]

    Europace 18(suppl 4), iv35–iv43 (2016)

    Loewe, A., Krueger, M.W., Holmqvist, F., D¨ossel, O., Seemann, G., Platonov, P.G.: Influence of the earliest right atrial activation site and its proximity to interatrial connections on p-wave morphology. Europace 18(suppl 4), iv35–iv43 (2016). DOI 10.1093/europace/euw349

    2016 doi

  46. [56]

    Biophys J117(12), 2244–2254 (2019)

    Loewe, A., Lutz, Y., Nairn, D., Fabbri, A., Nagy, N., Toth, N., Ye, X., Fuertinger, D.H., Gen- ovesi, S., Kotanko, P., Raimann, J.G., Severi, S.: Hypocalcemia-induced slowing of human si- nus node pacemaking. Biophys J117(12), 2244–2254 (2019). DOI 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.037

    2019 doi

  47. [57]

    Europace 16(S4), iv30–iv38 (2014)

    Loewe, A., Lutz, Y., Wilhelms, M., Sinnecker, D., Barthel, P., Scholz, E.P., D ¨ossel, O., Schmidt, G., Seemann, G.: In-silico assessment of the dynamic effects of amiodarone and dronedarone on human atrial patho-electrophysiology. Europace 16(S4), iv30–iv38 (2014). DOI 10.109...

    2014 doi

  48. [58]

    In: Innovative Treatment Strategies for Clinical Electrophysiology, pp

    Loewe, A., Mart ´ınez D´ıaz, P., Nagel, C., S ´anchez, J.: Cardiac digital twin modeling. In: Innovative Treatment Strategies for Clinical Electrophysiology, pp. 111–134. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore (2022). DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-6649-1 7

    2022 doi

  49. [59]

    Frontiers in Physiology 9(Article 1910) (2019)

    Loewe, A., Poremba, E., Oesterlein, T., Luik, A., Schmitt, C., Seemann, G., D ¨ossel, O.: Patient-specific identification of atrial flutter vulnerability–a computational approach to reveal latent reentry pathways. Frontiers in Physiology 9(Article 1910) (2019). DOI 10.3389/fph...

    2019

  50. [60]

    In: Biomedizinische Technik / Biomedical Engineering, vol

    Loewe, A., Wilhelms, M., D ¨ossel, O., Seemann, G.: Influence of chronic atrial fibrillation induced remodeling in a computational electrophysiological model. In: Biomedizinische Technik / Biomedical Engineering, vol. 59, pp. S929–S932. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Boston (2014)...

    2014 doi

  51. [61]

    Europace 16(3), 435–443 (2014)

    Loewe, A., Wilhelms, M., Fischer, F., Scholz, E.P., D ¨ossel, O., Seemann, G.: Arrhyth- mic potency of human ether-a-go-go-related gene mutations l532p and n588k in a com- putational model of human atrial myocytes. Europace 16(3), 435–443 (2014). DOI 10.1093/europace/eut375

    2014 doi

  52. [62]

    Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3, 209 (2016)

    Loewe, A., Wilhelms, M., Schmid, J., Krause, M.J., Fischer, F., Thomas, D., Scholz, E.P., D¨ossel, O., Seemann, G.: Parameter estimation of ion current formulations requires hybrid optimization approach to be both accurate and reliable. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3, 209 (2016). D...

    2016

  53. [63]

    EP Europace 23(S1), i63–i70 (2021)

    Lubrecht, J.M., Grandits, T., Gharaviri, A., Schotten, U., Pock, T., Plank, G., Krause, R., Auricchio, A., Conte, G., Pezzuto, S.: Automatic reconstruction of the left atrium activa- tion from sparse intracardiac contact recordings by inverse estimate of fibre structure and an...

    2021 doi

  54. [64]

    In: 2024 Computing in Car- diology Conference, vol

    Martinez Diaz, P., Maierhofer, P., Beigl, M., Loewe, A., Doessel, O.: Insights from explainable machine learning on biatrial arrhythmia vulnerability assessment. In: 2024 Computing in Car- diology Conference, vol. 51. Computing in Cardiology (2024). DOI 10.22489/cinc.2024.308....

    2024 doi

  55. [65]

    Europace 26(10) (2024)

    Mart ´ınez D ´ıaz, P., Das ´ı, A., Goetz, C., Unger, L.A., Haas, A., Luik, A., Rodr ´ıguez, B., D¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: Impact of effective refractory period personalization on arrhythmia vulnerability in patient-specific atrial computer models. Europace 26(10) (2024). DOI 10....

    2024 doi

  56. [66]

    Heart Rhythm (2024)

    Mart ´ınez D´ıaz, P., S ´anchez, J., Fitzen, N., Ravens, U., D ¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: The right atrium affects in silico arrhythmia vulnerability in both atria. Heart Rhythm (2024). DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.047 22 Olaf D ¨ossel and Axel Loewe

    2024 doi

  57. [67]

    The Journal of Physiology (2023)

    Mazhar, F., Bartolucci, C., Regazzoni, F., Paci, M., Ded`e, L., Quarteroni, A., Corsi, C., Severi, S.: A detailed mathematical model of the human atrial cardiomyocyte: integration of electro- physiology and cardiomechanics. The Journal of Physiology (2023). DOI 10.1113/jp283974

    2023 doi

  58. [68]

    J Physiol (2016)

    Mirams, G.R., Pathmanathan, P., Gray, R.A., Challenor, P., Clayton, R.H.: White paper: Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology. J Physiol (2016). DOI 10.1113/JP271671

    2016 doi

  59. [69]

    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 70(2), 511–522 (2023)

    Nagel, C., Barrios Espinosa, C., Gillette, K., Gsell, M.A., Sanchez, J., Plank, G., Dossel, O., Loewe, A.: Comparison of propagation models and forward calculation methods on cellular, tissue and organ scale atrial electrophysiology. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering...

    2023

  60. [70]

    J Clin Med 10(8), 1797 (2021)

    Nagel, C., Luongo, G., Azzolin, L., Schuler, S., D ¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: Non-invasive and quantitative estimation of left atrial fibrosis based on p waves of the 12-lead ecg—a large- scale computational study covering anatomical variability. J Clin Med 10(8), 1797 (2021). DOI...

    2021 doi

  61. [71]

    In: 2022 Computing in Cardiology Conference, vol

    Nagel, C., Osypka, J., Anna Unger, L., Nairn, D., Luik, A., Wakili, R., Doessel, O., Loewe, A.: Improving clinical ecg-based atrial fibrosis quantification with neural networks through in silico p waves from an extensive virtual patient cohort. In: 2022 Computing in Cardiology...

    2022 doi

  62. [72]

    Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart

    Nagel, C., Schaufelberger, M., D ¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: A bi-atrial statistical shape model as a basis to classify left atrial enlargement from simulated and clinical 12-lead ecgs. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Multi-Disease, Multi-View, and Multi-...

    2022 doi

  63. [73]

    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 34(8), 1613–1621 (2023)

    Nairn, D., Eichenlaub, M., Lehrmann, H., M¨ uller-Edenborn, B., Chen, J., Huang, T., Nagel, C., S´anchez, J., Luongo, G., Westermann, D., Arentz, T., D ¨ossel, O., Jadidi, A., Loewe, A.: Spatial correlation of left atrial low voltage substrate in sinus rhythm versus atrial fib...

    2023 doi

  64. [74]

    Europace 25(9) (2023)

    Nairn, D., Eichenlaub, M., M¨ uller-Edenborn, B., Huang, T., Lehrmann, H., Nagel, C., Azzolin, L., Luongo, G., Figueras Ventura, R.M., Rubio Forcada, B., Vall`es Colomer, A., Westermann, D., Arentz, T., D¨ossel, O., Loewe, A., Jadidi, A.: Differences in atrial substrate locali...

    2023

  65. [75]

    In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), vol

    Nairn, D., Hunyar, D., S´anchez, J., Doessel, O., Loewe, A.: Impact of electrode size on electro- gram voltage in healthy and diseased tissue. In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), vol. 47 (2020). DOI 10.22489/CinC.2020.146

    2020 doi

  66. [76]

    Frontiers in Physiology11, 575846 (2020)

    Nairn, D., Lehrmann, H., M¨ uller-Edenborn, B., Schuler, S., Arentz, T., D ¨ossel, O., Jadidi, A., Loewe, A.: Comparison of unipolar and bipolar voltage mapping for localization of left atrial arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with atrial fibrillation. Frontiers in Physiolo...

    2020

  67. [77]

    J Comput Phys346, 191–211 (2017)

    Neic, A., Campos, F.O., Prassl, A.J., Niederer, S.A., Bishop, M.J., Vigmond, E.J., Plank, G.: Efficient computation of electrograms and ecgs in human whole heart simulations using a reaction-eikonal model. J Comput Phys346, 191–211 (2017). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.06.020

    2017 doi

  68. [78]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369(1954), 4331–4351 (2011)

    Niederer, S.A., Kerfoot, E., Benson, A.P., Bernabeu, M.O., Bernus, O., Bradley, C., Cherry, E.M., Clayton, R., Fenton, F.H., Garny, A., Heidenreich, E., Land, S., Maleckar, M., Path- manathan, P., Plank, G., Rodriguez, J.F., Roy, I., Sachse, F.B., Seemann, G., Skavhaug, O., Sm...

    1954

  69. [79]

    Nature Computational Science1(5), 313–320 (2021)

    Niederer, S.A., Sacks, M.S., Girolami, M., Willcox, K.: Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial. Nature Computational Science1(5), 313–320 (2021). DOI 10.1038/s43588- 021-00072-5 Computerized Modeling of the Atria 23

    2021 doi

  70. [80]

    Front Physiol 12, 673047 (2021)

    Nothstein, M., Luik, A., Jadidi, A., S ´anchez, J., Unger, L.A., W¨ ulfers, E.M., D ¨ossel, O., Seemann, G., Schmitt, C., Loewe, A.: Cvar-seg: An automated signal segmentation pipeline for conduction velocity and amplitude restitution. Front Physiol 12, 673047 (2021). DOI 10.3...

    2021

  71. [81]

    Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 9(4) (2016)

    Pashakhanloo, F., Herzka, D.A., Ashikaga, H., Mori, S., Gai, N., Bluemke, D.A., Trayanova, N.A., McVeigh, E.R.: Myofiber architecture of the human atria as revealed by submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 9(4) (2016). DOI 10.116...

    2016 doi

  72. [82]

    PLoS Comput Biol 20(8), e1012289–e1012289 (2024)

    Pathmanathan, P., Aycock, K., Badal, A., Bighamian, R., Bodner, J., Craven, B.A., Niederer, S.: Credibility assessment of in silico clinical trials for medical devices. PLoS Comput Biol 20(8), e1012289–e1012289 (2024). DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012289

    2024 doi

  73. [83]

    Computers & Graphics 35(2), 431–440 (2011)

    Pernod, E., Sermesant, M., Konukoglu, E., Relan, J., Delingette, H., Ayache, N.: A multi- front eikonal model of cardiac electrophysiology for interactive simulation of radio-frequency ablation. Computers & Graphics 35(2), 431–440 (2011). DOI 10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.008

    2011 doi

  74. [84]

    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng32(10) (2016)

    Pezzuto, S., Hake, J., Sundnes, J.: Space-discretization error analysis and stabilization schemes for conduction velocity in cardiac electrophysiology. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng32(10) (2016). DOI 10.1002/cnm.2762

    2016 doi

  75. [85]

    Comput Methods Programs Biomed208, 106223 (2021)

    Plank, G., Loewe, A., Neic, A., Augustin, C., Huang, Y.L., Gsell, M.A.F., Karabelas, E., Nothstein, M., Prassl, A.J., S´anchez, J., Seemann, G., Vigmond, E.J.: The opencarp simulation environment for cardiac electrophysiology. Comput Methods Programs Biomed208, 106223 (2021). ...

    2021

  76. [86]

    Frontiers in Physiology 15 (2024)

    Ricci, E., Mazhar, F., Marzolla, M., Severi, S., Bartolucci, C.: Sinoatrial node heterogeneity and fibroblasts increase atrial driving capability in a two-dimensional human computational model. Frontiers in Physiology 15 (2024). DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1408626

    2024

  77. [87]

    Roberts, D.E., Scher, A.M.: Effect of tissue anisotropy on extracellular potential fields in canine myocardium in situ. Circ. Res. 50, 342–351 (1982)

    1982

  78. [88]

    Europace 18(suppl 4), iv146–iv155 (2016)

    Roney, C.H., Bayer, J.D., Zahid, S., Meo, M., Boyle, P.M.J., Trayanova, N.A., Ha¨ıssaguerre, M., Dubois, R., Cochet, H., Vigmond, E.J.: Modelling methodology of atrial fibrosis af- fects rotor dynamics and electrograms. Europace 18(suppl 4), iv146–iv155 (2016). DOI 10.1093/eur...

    2016 doi

  79. [89]

    Front Physiol11, 1145–1145 (2020)

    Roney, C.H., Beach, M.L., Mehta, A.M., Sim, I., Corrado, C., Bendikas, R., Solis-Lemus, J.A., Razeghi, O., Whitaker, J., O’Neill, L., Plank, G., Vigmond, E., Williams, S.E., O’Neill, M.D., Niederer, S.A.: Comparison of left atrial ablation techniques that target the anatomical...

    2020

  80. [90]

    Ann Biomed Eng (2020)

    Roney, C.H., Bendikas, R., Pashakhanloo, F., Corrado, C., Vigmond, E.J., McVeigh, E.R., Trayanova, N.A., Niederer, S.A.: Constructing a human atrial fibre atlas. Ann Biomed Eng (2020). DOI 10.1007/s10439-020-02525-w

    2020 doi

  81. [91]

    Med Image Anal 55, 65–75 (2019)

    Roney, C.H., Pashaei, A., Meo, M., Dubois, R., Boyle, P.M., Trayanova, N.A., Cochet, H., Niederer, S.A., Vigmond, E.J.: Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, regis- tration and construction of patient specific meshes. Med Image Anal 55, 65–75 (2019). DOI 10.10...

    2019 doi

  82. [92]

    Interface Focus 13(6) (2023)

    Roney, C.H., Solis Lemus, J.A., Lopez Barrera, C., Zolotarev, A., Ulgen, O., Kerfoot, E., Be- vis, L., Misghina, S., Vidal Horrach, C., Jaffery, O.A., Ehnesh, M., Rodero, C., Dharmaprani, D., R´ıos-Mu˜noz, G.R., Ganesan, A., Good, W.W., Neic, A., Plank, G., Hopman, L.H.G.A., G...

    2023

  83. [93]

    Engineering with Computers (2022)

    Ruiz Herrera, C., Grandits, T., Plank, G., Perdikaris, P., Sahli Costabal, F., Pezzuto, S.: Physics- informed neural networks to learn cardiac fiber orientation from multiple electroanatomical maps. Engineering with Computers (2022). DOI 10.1007/s00366-022-01709-3

    2022 doi

  84. [94]

    Nature Reviews Cardiology (2024)

    Schotten, U., Goette, A., Verheule, S.: Translation of pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrosis into new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Nature Reviews Cardiology (2024). DOI 10.1038/s41569-024-01088-w 24 Olaf D ¨ossel and Axel Loewe

    2024 doi

  85. [95]

    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci

    Seemann, G., H ¨oper, C., Sachse, F.B., D¨ossel, O., Holden, A.V., Zhang, H.: Heterogeneous three-dimensional anatomical and electrophysiological model of human atria. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 364(1843), 1465–1481 (2006)

    2006

  86. [96]

    Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology (2020)

    Shade, J.K., Ali, R.L., Basile, D., Popescu, D., Akhtar, T., Marine, J.E., Spragg, D.D., Calkins, H., Trayanova, N.A.: Pre-procedure application of machine learning and mecha- nistic simulations predicts likelihood of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmona...

    2020 doi

  87. [97]

    Front Physiol 8, 792 (2017)

    Shim, J., Hwang, M., Song, J.S., Lim, B., Kim, T.H., Joung, B., Kim, S.H., Oh, Y.S., Nam, G.B., On, Y.K., Oh, S., Kim, Y.H., Pak, H.N.: Virtual modeling guided catheter ablation predicts effective linear ablation lesion set for longstanding persistent atrial fib- rillation: Mu...

    2017

  88. [98]

    Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering 8(2), 133–136 (2022)

    Skupien, N., Barrios Espinosa, C., D ¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: Refining the eikonal model to reproduce the influence of atrial tissue geometry on conduction velocity. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering 8(2), 133–136 (2022). DOI 10.1515/cdbme-2022-1035

    2022 doi

  89. [99]

    Computers in Biology and Medicine p

    Sol ´ıs-Lemus, J.A., Baptiste, T., Barrows, R., Sillett, C., Gharaviri, A., Raffaele, G., Razeghi, O., Strocchi, M., Sim, I., Kotadia, I., Bodagh, N., O’Hare, D., O’Neill, M., Williams, S.E., Roney, C., Niederer, S.: Evaluation of an open-source pipeline to create patient-spec...

    2023

  90. [100]

    In: 2023 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), 10363691, pp

    Steyer, J., Chegini, F., Potse, M., Loewe, A., Weiser, M.: Continuity of microscopic cardiac conduction in a computational cell-by-cell model. In: 2023 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), 10363691, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2023). DOI 10.22489/CinC.2023.385

    2023 doi

  91. [101]

    In: Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol

    Steyer, J., Martinez Diaz, P., Unger, L.A., Loewe, A.: Simulated excitation patterns in the atria and their corresponding electrograms. In: Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 13958, pp. 204–212. Springer Nature Switzerland, C...

    2023 doi

  92. [102]

    Frontiers in Physiology 13 (2022)

    S ´anchez, J., Loewe, A.: A review of healthy and fibrotic myocardium microstructure modeling and corresponding intracardiac electrograms. Frontiers in Physiology 13 (2022). DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.908069

    2022

  93. [103]

    Front Physiol 12, 699291 (2021)

    S ´anchez, J., Luongo, G., Nothstein, M., Unger, L.A., Saiz, J., Trenor, B., Luik, A., D¨ossel, O., Loewe, A.: Using machine learning to characterize atrial fibrotic substrate from intracardiac signals with a hybrid in silico and in vivo dataset. Front Physiol 12, 699291 (2021...

    2021

  94. [104]

    Physiological Reviews104(3), 1265–1333 (2024)

    Trayanova, N.A., Lyon, A., Shade, J., Heijman, J.: Computational modeling of cardiac electro- physiology and arrhythmogenesis: toward clinical translation. Physiological Reviews104(3), 1265–1333 (2024). DOI 10.1152/physrev.00017.2023

    2024

  95. [105]

    Heart Rhythm 21(1), 89–99 (2024)

    Trayanova, N.A., Prakosa, A.: Up digital and personal: How heart digital twins can transform heart patient care. Heart Rhythm 21(1), 89–99 (2024). DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.10.019

    2024 doi

  96. [106]

    (eds.): Modeling Excitable Tissue

    Tveito, A., Mardal, K.A., Rognes, M.E. (eds.): Modeling Excitable Tissue. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-61157-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-61157-6

    2021 doi

  97. [107]

    Europace 23(S1), i133–i142 (2021)

    Unger, L.A., Azzolin, L., Nothstein, M., S ´anchez, J., Luik, A., Seemann, G., Yeshwant, S., Oesterlein, T., D ¨ossel, O., Schmitt, C., Spector, P., Loewe, A.: Cycle length statistics during human atrial fibrillation reveal refractory properties of the underlying substrate: a ...

    2021 doi

  98. [108]

    Comp Biol Med 92, 188–196 (2018)

    Verma, B., Oesterlein, T., Loewe, A., Luik, A., Schmitt, C., D¨ossel, O.: Regional conduction velocity calculation from clinical multichannel electrograms in human atria. Comp Biol Med 92, 188–196 (2018). DOI 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.11.017

    2018 doi

  99. [109]

    (eds.): Toward Good Simulation Practice

    Viceconti, M., Emili, L. (eds.): Toward Good Simulation Practice. Springer Nature Switzer- land, Cham (2024). DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-48284-7. URL https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978- 3-031-48284-7 Computerized Modeling of the Atria 25

    2024 doi

  100. [110]

    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 25(10), 3977–3982 (2021)

    Viceconti, M., Emili, L., Afshari, P., Courcelles, E., Curreli, C., Famaey, N., Geris, L., Horner, M., Jori, M.C., Kulesza, A., Loewe, A., Neidlin, M., Reiterer, M., Rousseau, C.F., Russo, G., Sonntag, S.J., Voisin, E.M., Pappalardo, F.: Possible contexts of use for in silico ...

    2021

  101. [111]

    Heart Rhythm 13(7), 1536–1543 (2016)

    Vigmond, E., Pashaei, A., Amraoui, S., Cochet, H., Hassaguerre, M.: Percolation as a mech- anism to explain atrial fractionated electrograms and reentry in a fibrosis model based on imaging data. Heart Rhythm 13(7), 1536–1543 (2016). DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.019

    2016 doi

  102. [112]

    IEEE Trans

    Vigmond, E.J., Aguel, F.N., Trayanova, A.: Computational techniques for solving the bido- main equations in three dimensions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49(11), 1260–1269 (2002)

    2002

  103. [113]

    CDBME 1(1), 409–412 (2015)

    Wachter, A., Loewe, A., Krueger, M.W., D¨ossel, O., Seemann, G.: Mesh structure-independent modeling of patient-specific atrial fiber orientation. CDBME 1(1), 409–412 (2015). DOI 10.1515/cdbme-2015-0099

    2015 doi

  104. [114]

    Computers in Biology and Medicine 114, 103444 (2019)

    Wang, Y., Xiong, Z., Nalar, A., Hansen, B.J., Kharche, S., Seemann, G., Loewe, A., Fe- dorov, V.V., Zhao, J.: A robust computational framework for estimating 3d bi-atrial cham- ber wall thickness. Computers in Biology and Medicine 114, 103444 (2019). DOI 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2...

    2019

  105. [115]

    Europace 18(12), 1758–1772 (2016)

    Whitaker, J., Rajani, R., Chubb, H., Gabrawi, M., Varela, M., Wright, M., Niederer, S., O’Neill, M.D.: The role of myocardial wall thickness in atrial arrhythmogenesis. Europace 18(12), 1758–1772 (2016). DOI 10.1093/europace/euw014

    2016 doi

  106. [116]

    Journal of the American Heart Association9(10) (2020)

    Wiedmann, F., Beyersdorf, C., Zhou, X., B¨ uscher, A., Kraft, M., Nietfeld, J., Walz, T.P., Unger, L.A., Loewe, A., Schmack, B., Ruhparwar, A., Karck, M., Thomas, D., Borggrefe, M., Seemann, G., Katus, H.A., Schmidt, C.: Pharmacologic twik-related acid-sensitive k+ channel (ta...

    2020 doi

  107. [117]

    Front Physiol 3(487), 1–16 (2013)

    Wilhelms, M., Hettmann, H., Maleckar, M.M.C., Koivum ¨aki, J.T., D¨ossel, O., Seemann, G.: Benchmarking electrophysiological models of human atrial myocytes. Front Physiol 3(487), 1–16 (2013). DOI 10.3389/fphys.2012.00487/abstract

    2013 arXiv

  108. [118]

    Metrology 3(1), 1–28 (2022)

    Winkler, B., Nagel, C., Farchmin, N., Heidenreich, S., Loewe, A., D¨ossel, O., B¨ar, M.: Global sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification for simulated atrial electrocardiograms. Metrology 3(1), 1–28 (2022). DOI 10.3390/metrology3010001

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.