Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 287 references

A White Paper on The Multi-Messenger Science Landscape in India

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This white paper argues that a coordinated Indian multi-messenger program, spanning gravitational waves, electromagnetic follow-up, neutrinos, and cosmic rays, would open discovery space from neutron-star interiors to cosmology, and it…

desk verdict A competent, honest community white paper on India's multi-messenger future; no new science, but the planning case holds and would benefit from refereeing to fix errors and tighten assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24408 v1 pith:N2QN3JV5 submitted 2025-05-30 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAhep-exhep-ph

Samsuzzaman Afroz , Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla , Dipankar Bhattacharya , Soumya Bhattacharya , Subir Bhattacharyya , Varun Bhalerao , Debanjan Bose , Chinmay Borwanker
show 30 more authors
Ishwara Chandra C. H. Aniruddha Chakraborty Indranil Chakraborty Sovan Chakraborty Debarati Chatterjee Varsha Chitnis Moon Moon Devi Sanjeev Dhurandhar Amol Dighe Bitan Ghosal Sourendu Gupta Arpan Hait Md Emanuel Hoque Pratik Majumdar Nilmani Mathur Harsh Mehta Subhendra Mohanty Reetanjali Moharana Arunava Mukherjee Suvodip Mukherjee Dhruv Pathak Tirthankar Roy Choudhury Mohit Raj Sah Prantik Sarmah Krishna Kumar Singh Rishi Sharma Swarnim Shirke Shriharsh P. Tendulkar Gaurav Waratkar Kuldeep Yadav
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.COastro-ph.GAhep-exhep-ph
keywords multi-messengerastronomygravitationalwavesLIGO-AundhapulsartimingarraysstandardsirensHubbleconstantneutronstarequationofstateLISA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper makes the case that multi-messenger astronomy—combining gravitational waves with electromagnetic, neutrino, and cosmic-ray observations—is the most promising route to several of the hardest open questions in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics. It argues that India's observatories, if coordinated through a dedicated consortium, are positioned to make a decisive contribution. The expected payoff includes sharper sky localization of gravitational-wave sources, higher joint detection rates, percent-level tests of modified gravity, and new constraints on the neutron-star equation of state. The paper is a planning document rather than a single falsifiable prediction, and its quantitative forecasts rest on specific assumptions about facility schedules and source rates.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a coordinated network of observatories spanning four messengers and complementary frequency bands: the gravitational-wave network in the hecto-hertz band (LIGO-Aundha joining LIGO-Hanford, LIGO-Livingston, Virgo, and KAGRA), the nHz band via InPTA and uGMRT with future SKA, and the milli-hertz band via LISA, linked by low-latency alerts to electromagnetic telescopes (MACE, AstroSat, GROWTH-India, uGMRT, Daksha) and to neutrino and cosmic-ray detectors. The load-bearing idea is that time-domain and frequency-domain coordination—rapid follow-up of gravitational-wave and neutrino alerts, shared sky maps and source parameters, and a single consortium for data analysis and training—is what converts individual detections into multi-messenger science.

What would settle it

If, by 2032, LIGO-Aundha has not begun joint science operations with the five-detector network, or if early LISA data show that fewer than roughly 50% of supermassive black hole mergers have detectable electromagnetic counterparts, the paper's quantitative forecasts (percent-level F(z) accuracy, Hubble-constant posteriors, and joint detection rates) would need to be scaled down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a coordinated activity for multi-messenger science in India will play a vital role in discovering uncharted territories in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics. It surveys the science cases—neutron-star equation of state, standard-siren cosmology, tests of general relativity, supermassive-black-hole evolution, and astroparticle physics—and shows how existing and planned Indian facilities fit into a global network. The load-bearing argument is that joining LIGO-Aundha to the gravitational-wave network, coupling it with MACE, AstroSat, GROWTH-India, uGMRT, and the proposed Daksha mission, and tying these to neutrino and cosmic-ray detectors through a multi-messenger coordination center would materially improve sky localization, joint detection rates, and cosmological parameter precision. The conclusion recommends a multi-messenger science consortium of India as the platform for both scientific studies and for building human and technical resources.

Load-bearing premise

The roadmap leans on the schedule that LIGO-Aundha begins its science run in 2030 and that Daksha, stereo-MACE, SKA, and IceCube-Gen2 come online as expected, plus the assumption that 50-75% of LISA's supermassive-black-hole mergers have detectable electromagnetic counterparts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With LIGO-Aundha in the five-detector network from about 2030, sky-localization areas for binary neutron star and neutron star-black hole mergers shrink enough that fast electromagnetic follow-up becomes practical for a substantially larger share of events.
  • If Daksha flies, it could detect up to about eight joint short gamma-ray-burst plus gravitational-wave events per year, along with hundreds of long and short gamma-ray bursts that feed multi-messenger studies.
  • For LISA-era bright sirens with a 50-75% electromagnetic-counterpart rate, the frictional term F(z) in modified gravity can be reconstructed to percent-level accuracy and Hubble-constant posteriors improve to sub-percent, directly addressing the Hubble tension.
  • Dark-siren analyses combining gravitational-wave events with DESI and LSST galaxy catalogs extend gravity tests and Hubble-constant measurements to z~2.5 with future detectors, without needing electromagnetic counterparts.
  • Coordinated X-ray and radio monitoring of low-mass X-ray binaries and glitching pulsars would shrink the search parameter space for continuous gravitational waves, lowering computing cost and raising sensitivity depth.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The consortium's role could extend beyond gravitational-wave-electromagnetic follow-up: the same low-latency alert infrastructure could jointly trigger on sub-threshold neutrino, gamma-ray, and gravitational-wave candidates, which the paper flags as promising but does not fully develop into a stated science case.
  • If the true electromagnetic-counterpart fraction for LISA sources lands below the assumed 50%, the bright-siren forecasts weaken but dark-siren cross-correlation methods become relatively more valuable, making investment in spectroscopic and photometric galaxy surveys as important as electromagnetic follow-up assets.
  • The paper's coordination model is testable: comparing actual joint detection rates and sky-localization areas in the first years of LIGO-Aundha's science run against its forecasts would calibrate how much of the predicted gain comes from network geometry versus the coordination center.
  • Because several of the listed facilities also serve gamma-ray bursts, tidal disruption events, young supernovae, and continuous-wave targets, the consortium's value may show up first in time-domain astronomy generally, not only in gravitational-wave-triggered follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This white paper argues that multi-messenger astronomy across gravitational waves, electromagnetic radiation, cosmic rays, and neutrinos opens discovery space from neutron-star interiors to cosmology, and that Indian facilities and a national coordination consortium can play a vital role in this effort. It reviews the science case in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics; describes current and planned Indian observatories (LIGO-Aundha, uGMRT/InPTA, MACE, AstroSat, GROWTH-India, Daksha, and participation in SKA and IceCube-Gen2); and recommends the creation of a multi-messenger science consortium of India. The quantitative forecasts in the cosmology chapter are explicitly taken from earlier papers by the authors, and the central claim is a planning-level resource-allocation statement rather than a single falsifiable prediction.

Significance. If the proposed roadmap is realized, India's geographic position and facilities would genuinely improve GW sky localization and EM follow-up completeness, with plausible benefits for joint detection rates, standard-siren H0 constraints, and neutron-star equation-of-state studies. The paper provides a useful, broad synthesis and a detailed inventory of Indian capabilities, and it is transparent in labeling the provenance of the forecast figures. The main weakness is not circularity—the self-citations are explicit—but the absence of a sensitivity discussion around the external schedules and astrophysical rate assumptions on which the quantitative forecasts rest. As a community planning document, its value lies in the synthesis and facility assessment rather than in new results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec 2.2 (Roadmap) and Figs 1.5, 1.9] The quantitative forecasts assume that LIGO-Aundha joins the GW network from 2030 onwards, that stereo-MACE is commissioned over 7 years, that Daksha, SKA, and IceCube-Gen2 materialize as planned, and that 50-75% of LISA SMBHB mergers have detectable EM counterparts. No sensitivity analysis is presented for a 2-5 year slip in LIGO-Aundha, a lower SMBHB counterpart fraction, or a Daksha launch delay. Because these same inputs drive the sky-localization, joint-detection, and H0-precision numbers used to support the coordination-center recommendation, the paper should either add explicit scenario analysis or clearly label these forecasts as best-case planning targets rather than central evidence.
  2. [Sec 1.1.2] The text states that charged particles with energies E ≲ 10^16 GeV get deflected in the galactic magnetic field and lose directional information. This is an order-of-magnitude error: the relevant galactic deflection scale for protons is around 10^18 eV (10^9 GeV), and 10^16 GeV corresponds to 10^25 eV, roughly nine orders of magnitude above the actual scale. The sentence should be corrected to E ≲ 10^18 eV (or the intended energy in eV), and the wording should distinguish galactic magnetic deflection from extragalactic magnetic deflection, since this underpins the UHECR multi-messenger motivation in the same section.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec 1.1.2] There are several typos: 'blazer' should be 'blazar', 'GRB 22109A' should be 'GRB 221009A', and 'diffused backgrounds' should be 'diffuse backgrounds'.
  2. [Sec 1.3.1] The text says 'In 2023, the L VK Collaboration published the GWTC-3'; GWTC-3 was released in 2021, so the year should be corrected.
  3. [Sec 1.2.4] The statement that Planck gives the tightest bound on the effective number of neutrino species of 'about 3.6' at 95% CL is imprecise; the 2018 Planck result is Neff = 2.99 ± 0.17, and the quoted upper bound should be made consistent with that value.
  4. [Sec 2.2] The claim that MACE is 'the highest among the present and future IACTs in the world' should be qualified, as future arrays at other sites could change this; at minimum the statement should be limited to currently operating instruments.
  5. [General] Notation is inconsistent: 'L VK', 'AstroSAT', and 'GMR T' appear with irregular spacing; the standard forms 'LVK', 'AstroSat', and 'uGMRT' should be used throughout.
  6. [Sec 2.2] The word 'propitiatory' in the discussion of Cherenkov telescope data access should be 'proprietary'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quantitative forecasts are explicitly credited to prior cited works and the central planning claim does not reduce to them.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a planning-level resource-allocation statement: 'A coordinated activity for multi-messenger science studies in India will play a vital role in the future of discovering uncharted territories in astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics.' The quantitative forecasts in the cosmology chapter, Figures 1.4 to 1.10, are explicitly taken from prior papers: Figure 1.4 states 'This plot is taken from [182]', Figure 1.7 states 'This plot is taken from [184]', and Figures 1.5, 1.9, and 1.10 state 'The details of the analysis behind this plot can be found in [183]' (or [184] in Figure 1.6). None of these figures is presented as a new prediction derived within this white paper, and none is fitted to data in this document. The forecasts depend on external assumptions such as LIGO-Aundha joining from 2030 onwards and 50% or 75% LISA EM-counterpart fractions, but these are stated input assumptions rather than quantities derived from the conclusion being advocated. The roadmap recommendation would stand or fall on facility availability and astrophysical rates, not on a circular reuse of its own outputs. A few of the cited forecast papers may involve overlapping authors, but the white paper labels them as prior work and does not use them as a uniqueness or exclusion argument. There is no step where a quantity is defined in terms of another quantity it is supposed to predict, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The lack of sensitivity analysis for schedule slips is a robustness limitation, not circularity. Therefore no circular step is identified; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger holds no fitted parameters introduced by this document; the two entries are hand-set scenario inputs inherited from the cited forecast papers. The four axioms are the standard physics framework, the standard-siren redshift assumption, and two planning assumptions (facility timelines and EM counterpart fractions) that the roadmap depends on. No invented physical entities are introduced; the proposed coordination center is an organizational proposal, not a scientific entity.

free parameters (2)
  • EM counterpart detection fraction for LISA sources = 50% and 75% (scenario choices, not measured)
    Figures 1.5 and 1.9 reproduce forecasts from [183] assuming 75% or 50% of LISA SMBHB events have EM counterparts. These are chosen scenario inputs, and the H0 and F(z) precision claims scale with them.
  • Observation time and duty cycle scenarios for GW detectors = LVK 5 yr; CE and ET 1 yr; LISA 4 yr or 10 yr; 75% duty cycle
    Figures 1.4, 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10 rely on the cited works' assumed observation durations, duty cycles, and detector sensitivities. The forecast precisions are hand-set by these inputs.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard Lambda-CDM cosmology with the w0-wa dark energy parametrization
    Sec 1.2.1 frames the Hubble tension, dark energy, and modified gravity entirely within Lambda-CDM and its w0-wa extensions; the forecast figures inherit this framework.
  • domain assumption GW standard sirens yield redshifts only with EM counterparts or galaxy-catalog cross-correlation
    The F(z) and H0 reconstructions (Figures 1.4 to 1.10) assume bright-siren redshifts from EM counterparts (from [182]) or dark-siren redshifts from DESI/LSST galaxy catalogs (from [183, 184]).
  • domain assumption Scheduled Indian and international facilities will be operational on the stated timelines
    The roadmap in Sec 2.2 and 2.3 assumes LIGO-Aundha joins the network from 2030, Daksha flies, stereo-MACE is commissioned in about 7 years, and SKA and IceCube-Gen2 proceed. Any slippage weakens the coordination-center case.
  • domain assumption GZK neutrino and photon production models are accurate enough for the forecast sensitivities
    Sec 1.1.2 uses standard GZK secondary flux estimates. Heavy UHECR composition or large extra-galactic radio background uncertainty would change the stated detection forecasts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A White Paper on The Multi-Messenger Science Landscape in India." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N2QN3JV5

@misc{pith2026250524408,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A White Paper on The Multi-Messenger Science Landscape in India},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N2QN3JV5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24408}
}
read the original abstract

The multi-messenger science using different observational windows to the Universe such as Gravitational Waves (GWs), Electromagnetic Waves (EMs), Cosmic Rays (CRs), and Neutrinos offer an opportunity to study from the scale of a neutron star to cosmological scales over a large cosmic time. At the smallest scales, we can explore the structure of the neutron star and the different energetics involved in the transition of a pre-merger neutron star to a post-merger neutron star. This will open up a window to study the properties of matter in extreme conditions and a guaranteed discovery space. On the other hand, at the largest cosmological scales, multi-messenger observations allow us to study the long-standing problems in physical cosmology related to the Hubble constant, dark matter, and dark energy by mapping the expansion history of the Universe using GW sources. Moreover, the multi-messenger studies of astrophysical systems such as white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes of different masses, all the way up to a high redshift Universe, will bring insightful understanding into the physical processes associated with them that are inaccessible otherwise. This white paper discusses the key cases in the domain of multi-messenger astronomy and the role of observatories in India which can explore uncharted territories and open discovery spaces in different branches of physics ranging from nuclear physics to astrophysics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24408 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The key science issues that may be addressed by multi-messenger observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Typical flux estimates of gamma-rays (left) and high energy neutrinos (right) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. High energy neutrinos and gamma-rays from YSNe (thin) and UHECRs (thick). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. Figure 1.3: This diagram illustrates the methodology for exploring the frictional term in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1_3.png]
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.4. Figure 1.4: This plot showcases the precision achievable in reconstructing the redshift variation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_1_4.png]
Figure 1.5
Figure 1.5. Figure 1.5: This plot illustrates the precision in reconstructing the redshift evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1_5.png]
Figure 1.6
Figure 1.6. Figure 1.6: This “violin”-plot illustrates the posterior on the reconstruction of the non-GR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_1_6.png]
Figure 1.7
Figure 1.7. Figure 1.7: This violin plot illustrates the posterior on the reconstruction of the non-GR param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_1_7.png]
Figure 1.8
Figure 1.8. Figure 1.8: The plot illustrates the posterior distribution of the Hubble constant, H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1_8.png]
Figure 1.9
Figure 1.9. Figure 1.9: This plot shows the posterior distribution of the Hubble constant, H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1_9.png]
Figure 1.10
Figure 1.10. Figure 1.10: The plot illustrates the posterior distribution of the Hubble constant, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_1_10.png]
Figure 1.11
Figure 1.11. Figure 1.11: A schematic diagram illustrating the multi-messenger study of SMBHBs. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_1_11.png]
Figure 1.12
Figure 1.12. Figure 1.12: Theoretical angular cross-correlation between SGWB and the galaxy distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_1_12.png]
Figure 1.13
Figure 1.13. Figure 1.13: Schematic figure connecting neutron star interior composition, EoS and astrophys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_1_13.png]
Figure 1.14
Figure 1.14. Figure 1.14: Flowchart demonstrating how nuclear parameters can be constrained using neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_1_14.png]
Figure 1.15
Figure 1.15. Figure 1.15: Characteristic strain for the memory signal is plotted along with the characteristic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_1_15.png]
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Sensitivity depth D as a function of (4D) computing cost CP (measured in million core hours [Mh] of a single-core CPU) for varying maximum mismatch µmax at fixed number and length of segments, assuming Sco X-1 search parameter space of Table-II from [264]. Sensitivit…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

287 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Paul D. Lasky. Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review.Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., 32:e034, 2015. doi: 10.1017/pasa.2015.35

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.35 2015

  2. [2]

    Neutron-star measurements in the multi-messenger Era.Astropart

    Stefano Ascenzi, Vanessa Graber, and Nanda Rea. Neutron-star measurements in the multi-messenger Era.Astropart. Phys., 158:102935, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys. 2024.102935

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies.JHEAp, 34:49– 211, 2022

    Elcio Abdalla et al. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies.JHEAp, 34:49– 211, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002

    doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  4. [4]

    History of dark matter.Rev

    Gianfranco Bertone and Dan Hooper. History of dark matter.Rev. Mod. Phys., 90: 045002, Oct 2018. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002. URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 2018

  5. [5]

    David N. Spergel. The dark side of cosmology: Dark matter and dark energy.Science, 347(6226):1100–1102, 2015. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0980. URLhttps://www.science. org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aaa0980

    doi:10.1126/science.aaa0980 2015

  6. [6]

    Wolf and Pedro G

    William J. Wolf and Pedro G. Ferreira. Underdetermination of dark energy.Phys. Rev. D, 108:103519, Nov 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103519. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103519

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.103519 2023

  7. [7]

    Holz, Emil Mottola, Suvodip Mukherjee, Bangalore Sathyaprakash, Xavier Siemens, and Nicol´ as Yunes

    Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, Zolt´ an Haiman, Daniel E. Holz, Emil Mottola, Suvodip Mukherjee, Bangalore Sathyaprakash, Xavier Siemens, and Nicol´ as Yunes. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Fundamental Physics and Beyond the Standard Model. In Snowmass 2021, 3 2022

    2021

  8. [8]

    Fox, Chad Hanna, and Kohta Murase

    P´ eter M´ esz´ aros, Derek B. Fox, Chad Hanna, and Kohta Murase. Multi-Messenger Astro- physics.Nature Rev. Phys., 1:585–599, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s42254-019-0101-z

    doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0101-z 2019

Show all 287 references
  1. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA.Living Rev. Rel., 19:1, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. Advanced LIGO.Class. Quant. Grav., 32:074001, 2015. doi: 10.1088/ 0264-9381/32/7/074001

    2015

  3. [11]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector.Class. Quant. Grav., 32(2):024001, 2015. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    The upgrade of GEO600.J

    Harald Luck et al. The upgrade of GEO600.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 228:012012, 2010. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/228/1/012012. 59 60BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2010 doi

  5. [14]

    Unnikrishnan

    C.S. Unnikrishnan. IndIGO and LIGO-India: Scope and plans for gravitational wave research and precision metrology in India.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 22:1341010, 2013. doi: 10.1142/S0218271813410101

    2013 doi

  6. [15]

    The science case for ligo-india.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39(2):025004, 2021

    M Saleem, Javed Rana, V Gayathri, Aditya Vijaykumar, Srashti Goyal, Surabhi Sachdev, Jishnu Suresh, S Sudhagar, Arunava Mukherjee, Gurudatt Gaur, et al. The science case for ligo-india.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39(2):025004, 2021

    2021

  7. [16]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background.Astrophys

    Gabriella Agazie et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background.Astrophys. J. Lett., 951(1):L8, 2023. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6

    2023 doi

  8. [17]

    Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I.Res

    Heng Xu et al. Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I.Res. Astron. Astrophys., 23(7): 075024, 2023. doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5

    2023 doi

  9. [18]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array I. The dataset and timing analysis.Astron. Astrophys., 6 2023. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202346841

    2023 doi

  10. [19]

    Precision pulsar timing with the ort and the gmrt and its applications in pulsar astrophysics.Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 39(4):51, 2018

    Bhal Chandra Joshi, Prakash Arumugasamy, Manjari Bagchi, Debades Bandyopadhyay, Avishek Basu, Neelam Dhanda Batra, Suryarao Bethapudi, Arpita Choudhary, Kishalay De, L Dey, et al. Precision pulsar timing with the ort and the gmrt and its applications in pulsar astrophysics.Jou...

    2018

  11. [20]

    Reardon et al

    Daniel J. Reardon et al. Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array.Astrophys. J. Lett., 951(1):L6, 2023. doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/acdd02

    2023

  12. [21]

    Miles et al

    Matthew T. Miles et al. The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: first data release.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 519(3):3976–3991, 2023. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3644

    2023 doi

  13. [22]

    Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA.PoS, AASKA14:037,

    Gemma Janssen et al. Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA.PoS, AASKA14:037,

  14. [23]

    Nanohertz gravitational wave astronomy during SKA era: An InPTA perspective.J

    Bhal Chandra Joshi et al. Nanohertz gravitational wave astronomy during SKA era: An InPTA perspective.J. Astrophys. Astron., 43(2):98, 2022. doi: 10.1007/ s12036-022-09869-w

    2022

  15. [24]

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, Enrico Barausse, Pe- ter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Pierre Binetruy, Michael Born, Daniele Bortoluzzi, Jordan Camp, Chiara Caprini, Vitor Cardoso, Monica Colpi, John Conklin, Neil Cornish, Curt Cutler, Karsten Danzman...

    2017 doi arXiv

  16. [25]

    Current status and operation of the H.E.S.S

    Stefan Ohm and Stefan Wagner. Current status and operation of the H.E.S.S. array of imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 1055:168442, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2023.168442

    2023

  17. [26]

    The magic telescope.PoS, HEP2005:020, 2006

    Ciro Bigongiari. The magic telescope.PoS, HEP2005:020, 2006. doi: 10.22323/1.021.0020

    2006 doi

  18. [27]

    Acharyya et al

    A. Acharyya et al. VTSCat: The VERITAS Catalog of Gamma-Ray Observations.Res. Notes AAS, 7(1):6, 2023. doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/acb147

    2023 doi

  19. [28]

    K. K. Yadav, N. Chouhan, R. Thubstan, S. Norlha, J. Hariharan, C. Borwankar, P. Chan- dra, V. K. Dhar, N. Mankuzhyil, S. Godambe, M. Sharma, K. Venugopal, K. K. Singh, and N. Bhatt. Commissioning of the MACE gamma-ray telescope at Hanle, Ladakh, India. Current Science, 123(12)...

    2022 doi

  20. [29]

    W. B. Atwood et al. The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission.ApJ, 697(2):1071–1102, June 2009. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

    2009 doi

  21. [30]

    Gehrels et al

    N. Gehrels et al. The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission.ApJ, 611(2):1005–1020, August

  22. [31]

    Harrison et al

    Fiona A. Harrison et al. The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High- Energy X-Ray Mission.Astrophys. J., 770:103, 2013. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  23. [32]

    K. P. Singh et al. ASTROSAT mission. In Tadayuki Takahashi, Jan-Willem A. den Herder, and Mark Bautz, editors,Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultravio- let to Gamma Ray, volume 9144 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, page ...

    2014 doi

  24. [33]

    P. S. Cowperthwaite et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models.ApJL, 848(2):L17, October 2017. doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/aa8fc7

    2017

  25. [34]

    Flaugher et al

    B. Flaugher et al. The Dark Energy Camera.AJ, 150(5):150, November 2015. doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

    2015 doi

  26. [35]

    et al T. M. Brown. Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network.PASP, 125 (931):1031, September 2013. doi: 10.1086/673168

    2013 doi

  27. [36]

    D. A. H. Buckley, P. A. Charles, D. O’Donoghue, and K. H. Nordsieck. Completion of the Southern African Large Telescope. InIAU Special Session, volume 1 ofIAU Special Session, page 8, August 2006

    2006

  28. [37]

    R. S. Stobie. The South African Large Telescope. In Walter F. Wargau and Barbara Cunow, editors,Second Symposium of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa, page 111, January 1994. 62BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1994

  29. [38]

    R. A. Perley, C. J. Chandler, B. J. Butler, and J. M. Wrobel. The Expanded Very Large Array: A New Telescope for New Science.ApJL, 739(1):L1, September 2011. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1

    2011 doi

  30. [39]

    Gupta, B

    Y. Gupta, B. Ajithkumar, H. S. Kale, S. Nayak, S. Sabhapathy, S. Sureshkumar, R. V. Swami, J. N. Chengalur, S. K. Ghosh, C. H. Ishwara-Chandra, B. C. Joshi, N. Kanekar, D. V. Lal, and S. Roy. The upgraded GMRT: opening new windows on the radio Universe. Current Science, 113(4)...

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    Lsst: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products.The Astrophysical Journal, 873 (2):111, 2019

    ˇZeljko Ivezi´ c, Steven M Kahn, J Anthony Tyson, Bob Abel, Emily Acosta, Robyn Allsman, David Alonso, Yusra AlSayyad, Scott F Anderson, John Andrew, et al. Lsst: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products.The Astrophysical Journal, 873 (2):111, 2019

    2019

  32. [41]

    Akeson et al

    R. Akeson et al. The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1902.05569, February 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    1902 doi arXiv

  33. [42]

    Icecube-gen2: a vision for the future of neutrino astronomy in antarctica.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5106, 2014

    Mark G Aartsen, M Ackermann, J Adams, JA Aguilar, M Ahlers, M Ahrens, D Altmann, T Anderson, G Anton, C Arguelles, et al. Icecube-gen2: a vision for the future of neutrino astronomy in antarctica.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5106, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Adrian-Martinez et al

    S. Adrian-Martinez et al. Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0.J. Phys. G, 43(8):084001,

  35. [44]

    M. G. Aartsen et al. IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe.J. Phys. G, 48 (6):060501, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abbd48

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    Aiello et al

    S. Aiello et al. Astronomy potential of KM3NeT/ARCA.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(9):885,

  37. [46]

    Mega science vision-2035– astron- omy and astrophysics, 2024

    The Indian Astronomy and Astrophysics Community. Mega science vision-2035– astron- omy and astrophysics, 2024. URLhttp://202.52.53.8/MSV-2035/index.html

    2024

  38. [47]

    Asi document-2024, 2024

    The Astronomical Society of India. Asi document-2024, 2024. URLhttps: //astron-soc.in/sites/default/files/asi_vision_document/asi_vision_ document_2024.pdf

    2024

  39. [48]

    India’s First Robotic Eye for Time-domain Astrophysics: The GROWTH-India Telescope.Astron

    Harsh Kumar et al. India’s First Robotic Eye for Time-domain Astrophysics: The GROWTH-India Telescope.Astron. J., 164(3):90, 2022. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7bea

    2022 doi

  40. [49]

    B. P. Abbott, LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al., and Virgo Collaboration. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.PRL, 116(6):061102, February

  41. [50]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3.Phys. Rev. X, 13(1):011048, 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13. 011048

    2023 doi

  42. [51]

    B. P. Abbott, LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al., and Virgo Collaboration. Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical Review Letters, 119(16), Oct 2017. ISSN 1079-7114. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101. URL http://dx.doi.org/...

    2017 doi

  43. [53]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    doi

  44. [54]

    Electromagnetic Counterparts Powered by Kicked Remnants of Black Hole Binary Mergers in AGN Disks.Astrophys

    Ken Chen and Zi-Gao Dai. Electromagnetic Counterparts Powered by Kicked Remnants of Black Hole Binary Mergers in AGN Disks.Astrophys. J., 961(2):206, 2024. doi: 10. 3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd

    2024

  45. [55]

    Coleman Miller, and Laura Blecha

    Tamara Bogdanovic, M. Coleman Miller, and Laura Blecha. Electromagnetic counter- parts to massive black-hole mergers.Living Rev. Rel., 25(1):3, 2022. doi: 10.1007/ s41114-022-00037-8

    2022

  46. [56]

    Multimessenger science opportunities with mHz gravitational waves

    John Baker et al. Multimessenger science opportunities with mHz gravitational waves. 3 2019

    2019

  47. [57]

    Daniel M. Siegel. GW170817–the first observed neutron star merger and its kilonova: implications for the astrophysical site of the r-process.Eur. Phys. J. A, 55(11):203, 2019. doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12888-9

    2019 doi

  48. [58]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150M ⊙. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(10):101102, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

    2020 doi

  49. [59]

    M. J. Graham et al. Candidate electromagnetic counterpart to the binary black hole merger gravitational-wave event s190521g.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:251102, Jun 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.251102. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.251102

    2020 doi

  50. [61]

    Ansoldi et al

    S. Ansoldi et al. The Blazar TXS 0506+056 Associated with a High-energy Neutrino: Insights into Extragalactic Jets and Cosmic-Ray Acceleration.ApJL, 863(1):L10, August

  51. [62]

    Ewing et al

    B. Ewing et al. Performance of the low-latency gstlal inspiral search towards ligo, virgo, and kagra’s fourth observing run.Phys. Rev. D, 109:042008, Feb 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.042008. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 109.042008

    2024 doi

  52. [63]

    Nitz, Tito Dal Canton, Derek Davis, and Steven Reyes

    Alexander H. Nitz, Tito Dal Canton, Derek Davis, and Steven Reyes. Rapid detection of gravitational waves from compact binary mergers with pycbc live.Phys. Rev. D, 98: 024050, Jul 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024050. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024050

    2018 doi

  53. [64]

    Adams, D

    T. Adams, D. Buskulic, V. Germain, G. M. Guidi, F. Marion, M. Montani, B. Mours, F. Piergiovanni, and G. Wang. Low-latency analysis pipeline for compact binary coa- lescences in the advanced gravitational wave detector era.Class. Quant. Grav., 33(17): 175012, 2016. doi: 10.108...

    2016 doi

  54. [65]

    RA VEN: LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA gravitational wave focused multi-messenger pipeline

    Naresh Adhikari, Brandon Piotrzkowski, Patrick Brady, and L VK Team. RA VEN: LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA gravitational wave focused multi-messenger pipeline. InAPS April Meet- ing Abstracts, volume 2023 ofAPS Meeting Abstracts, page H09.008, January 2023. 64BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2023

  55. [66]

    Albert et al

    A. Albert et al. Search for High-energy Neutrinos from Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 with ANTARES, IceCube, and the Pierre Auger Observatory.Astrophys. J. Lett., 850(2):L35, 2017. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9aed

    2017 doi

  56. [67]

    Gracedb: A gravitational wave candidate event database, 2014

    Brian Moe, Patrick Brady, Branson Stephens, Erik Katsavounidis, Roy Williams, and Fan Zhang. Gracedb: A gravitational wave candidate event database, 2014. URLhttps: //dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1400365/public

    2014

  57. [68]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    David Reitze et al. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO.Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 51:035, 7 2019

    2019

  58. [69]

    Punturo et al

    M. Punturo et al. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave obser- vatory.Class. Quant. Grav., 27:194002, 2010. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002

    2010 doi

  59. [70]

    Wave effects in gravitational lensing of gravitational waves from chirping binaries.Astrophys

    Ryuichi Takahashi and Takashi Nakamura. Wave effects in gravitational lensing of gravitational waves from chirping binaries.Astrophys. J., 595:1039–1051, 2003. doi: 10.1086/377430

    2003 doi

  60. [71]

    Chu et al

    Q. Chu et al. Spiir online coherent pipeline to search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences.Phys. Rev. D, 105:024023, Jan 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105. 024023. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024023

    2022 doi

  61. [72]

    S. Gao, A. Fedynitch, W. Winter, and M. Pohl.Nature Astronomy, 3:88, 2019

    2019

  62. [73]

    Cerruti, A

    M. Cerruti, A. Zech, C. Boisson, G. Emery, S. Inoue, and J.-P. Lenain.MNRAS, 483: L12, 2019

    2019

  63. [74]

    Padovani, F

    P. Padovani, F. Oikonomou, M. Petropoulou, P. Giommi, and E. Resconi.MNARS, 484: L104, 2019

    2019

  64. [75]

    Raffelt and G

    G. Raffelt and G. Sigl. Neutrino flavor conversion in a supernova core.Astropart. Phys., 1:165–184, 1993. doi: 10.1016/0927-6505(93)90020-E

    1993 doi

  65. [76]

    Multi- messenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino icecube- 170922a.Science, 361, 2018

    IceCube Collaboration, Fermi-LAT Collaboration, MAGIC Collaboration, et al. Multi- messenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino icecube- 170922a.Science, 361, 2018

    2018

  66. [77]

    Neutrino Flavor Conversions in High-Density Astrophysical and Cosmological Environments.Universe, 8(2):94, 2022

    Francesco Capozzi and Ninetta Saviano. Neutrino Flavor Conversions in High-Density Astrophysical and Cosmological Environments.Universe, 8(2):94, 2022. doi: 10.3390/ universe8020094

    2022

  67. [78]

    Hirata, T

    K. Hirata, T. Kajita, M. Koshiba, M. Nakahata, Y. Oyama, N. Sato, A. Suzuki, M. Takita, Y. Totsuka, T. Kifune, T. Suda, K. Takahashi, T. Tanimori, K. Miyano, M. Yamada, E. W. Beier, L. R. Feldscher, S. B. Kim, A. K. Mann, F. M. Newcomer, R. Van, W. Zhang, and B. G. Cortez. Obs...

    1987 doi

  68. [79]

    Langanke, A

    Hans-Thomas Janka, K. Langanke, A. Marek, G. Martinez-Pinedo, and B. Mueller. The- ory of Core-Collapse Supernovae.Phys. Rept., 442:38–74, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep. 2007.02.002

    2007 doi

  69. [80]

    Fast neutrino flavor conver- sions near the supernova core with realistic flavor-dependent angular distributions.JCAP, 02:019, 2017

    Basudeb Dasgupta, Alessandro Mirizzi, and Manibrata Sen. Fast neutrino flavor conver- sions near the supernova core with realistic flavor-dependent angular distributions.JCAP, 02:019, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/019. BIBLIOGRAPHY65

    2017 doi

  70. [81]

    Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection.Riv

    Alessandro Mirizzi, Irene Tamborra, Hans-Thomas Janka, Ninetta Saviano, Kate Schol- berg, Robert Bollig, Lorenz Hudepohl, and Sovan Chakraborty. Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection.Riv. Nuovo Cim., 39(1-2):1–112, 2016. doi: 10.1393/ncr/i2016-10120-8

    2016 doi

  71. [82]

    Fukuda et al

    Y. Fukuda et al. The Super-Kamiokande detector.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 501:418–462,

  72. [83]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report. 5 2018

    2018

  73. [84]

    Kachelriess, Ricard Tomas, R

    M. Kachelriess, Ricard Tomas, R. Buras, H. Th. Janka, A. Marek, and M. Rampp. Ex- ploiting the neutronization burst of a galactic supernova.Phys. Rev. D, 71:063003, 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063003

    2005 doi

  74. [85]

    Al Kharusi et al

    S. Al Kharusi et al. SNEWS 2.0: a next-generation supernova early warning system for multi-messenger astronomy.New J. Phys., 23(3):031201, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ abde33

    2021 doi

  75. [87]

    Circumstellar material around evolved massive stars, 2010

    Nathan Smith. Circumstellar material around evolved massive stars, 2010. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1010.3720

    2010 arXiv

  76. [88]

    Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars.Ann

    Nathan Smith. Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars.Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 52:487–528, 2014. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025

    2014 doi

  77. [89]

    W. V. Jacobson-Galan et al. SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: Photo-ionization of Dense, Close- in Circumstellar Material in a Nearby Type II Supernova.Astrophys. J. Lett., 954(2):L42,

  78. [90]

    Chevalier and Claes Fransson

    Roger A. Chevalier and Claes Fransson. Supernova interaction with a circumstellar medium.Lect. Notes Phys., 598:171, 2003. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45863-8 10

    2003 doi

  79. [91]

    Thompson, Brian C

    Kohta Murase, Todd A. Thompson, Brian C. Lacki, and John F. Beacom. New Class of High-Energy Transients from Crashes of Supernova Ejecta with Massive Circumstellar Material Shells.Phys. Rev. D, 84:043003, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.043003

    2011 doi

  80. [92]

    C. S. Kochanek et al. The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0.PASP, 129(980):104502, October 2017. doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ aa80d9

    2017 doi

  81. [93]

    High-Energy Multimessenger Transient Astrophysics

    Kohta Murase and Imre Bartos. High-Energy Multimessenger Transient Astrophysics. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 69:477–506, 2019. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023510

    2019 doi

  82. [94]

    High energy particles from young supernovae: gamma-ray and neutrino connections.JCAP, 08(08): 011, 2022

    Prantik Sarmah, Sovan Chakraborty, Irene Tamborra, and Katie Auchettl. High energy particles from young supernovae: gamma-ray and neutrino connections.JCAP, 08(08): 011, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/011

    2022 doi

  83. [95]

    Gamma rays and neutrinos from supernovae of type Ib and Ic with late time emission.Phys

    Prantik Sarmah, Sovan Chakraborty, Irene Tamborra, and Katie Auchettl. Gamma rays and neutrinos from supernovae of type Ib and Ic with late time emission.Phys. Rev. D, 108(10):103033, 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103033

    2023 doi

  84. [96]

    New constraints on the gamma-ray and high energy neutrino fluxes from the circumstellar interaction of SN 2023ixf.JCAP, 04:083, 2024

    Prantik Sarmah. New constraints on the gamma-ray and high energy neutrino fluxes from the circumstellar interaction of SN 2023ixf.JCAP, 04:083, 2024. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/ 2024/04/083. 66BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2024 doi

  85. [97]

    S. R. Kelner, Felex A. Aharonian, and V. V. Bugayov. Energy spectra of gamma-rays, electrons and neutrinos produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high energy regime.Phys. Rev. D, 74:034018, 2006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034018. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 039901 (2009)]

    2009 doi

  86. [98]

    New Prospects for Detecting High-Energy Neutrinos from Nearby Super- novae.Phys

    Kohta Murase. New Prospects for Detecting High-Energy Neutrinos from Nearby Super- novae.Phys. Rev. D, 97(8):081301, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.081301

    2018 doi

  87. [99]

    Thompson, and Eran O

    Kohta Murase, Todd A. Thompson, and Eran O. Ofek. Probing Cosmic-Ray Ion Accelera- tion with Radio-Submm and Gamma-Ray Emission from Interaction-Powered Supernovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 440(3):2528–2543, 2014. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu384

    2014 doi

  88. [100]

    Blanchard et al

    Peter K. Blanchard et al. JWST detection of a supernova associated with GRB 221009A without an r-process signature.Nature Astron., 8(6):774–785, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02237-4

    2024 doi

  89. [102]

    Searching for high-energy neutrinos from shock-interaction powered supernovae with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory.PoS, ICRC2023:1105, 2023

    Massimiliano Lincetto et al. Searching for high-energy neutrinos from shock-interaction powered supernovae with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory.PoS, ICRC2023:1105, 2023. doi: 10.22323/1.444.1105

    2023 doi

  90. [103]

    Petropoulou, S

    M. Petropoulou, S. Coenders, G. Vasilopoulos, A. Kamble, and L. Sironi. Point-source and diffuse high-energy neutrino emission from Type IIn supernovae.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 470(2):1881–1893, 2017. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1251

    2017 doi

  91. [104]

    Origin and propagation of extremely high- energy cosmic rays.Phys

    Pijushpani Bhattacharjee and Gunter Sigl. Origin and propagation of extremely high- energy cosmic rays.Phys. Rept., 327:109–247, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00101-5

    doi

  92. [105]

    Cosmic Ray Physics

    Domenico D’Urso. Cosmic Ray Physics. 11 2014

    2014

  93. [106]

    A tera–electron volt afterglow from a narrow jet in an extremely bright gamma-ray burst.Science, 380(6652):adg9328, 2023

    Zhen Cao et al. A tera–electron volt afterglow from a narrow jet in an extremely bright gamma-ray burst.Science, 380(6652):adg9328, 2023. doi: 10.1126/science.adg9328

    2023 doi

  94. [107]

    G. T. Zatsepin and V. A. Kuzmin. Upper limit of the spectrum of cosmic rays.JETP Lett., 4:78–80, 1966

    1966

  95. [108]

    R. U. Abbasi et al. The energy spectrum of cosmic rays measured by the Telescope Array using 10 years of fluorescence detector data.Astropart. Phys., 151:102864, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2023.102864

    2023

  96. [109]

    Abreu et al

    P. Abreu et al. The energy spectrum of cosmic rays beyond the turn-down around 10 17 eV as measured with the surface detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(11):966, 2021. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09700-w

    2021 doi

  97. [110]

    R. U. Abbasi et al. Measurement of the flux of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays from monoc- ular observations by the High Resolution Fly’s Eye experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 92: 151101, 2004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.151101

    2004 doi

  98. [111]

    R. U. Abbasi et al. First observation of the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin suppression.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:101101, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.101101

    2008 doi

  99. [112]

    Hayashida et al

    N. Hayashida et al. Updated AGASA event list above 4 x 10**19-eV. 8 2000

    2000

  100. [113]

    End to the cosmic-ray spectrum?Phys

    Kenneth Greisen. End to the cosmic-ray spectrum?Phys. Rev. Lett., 16:748–750, Apr

  101. [115]

    Privon et al

    George C. Privon et al. Search for high-energy neutrino emission from hard X-ray AGN with IceCube.PoS, ICRC2023:1032, 2023. doi: 10.22323/1.444.1032

    2023 doi

  102. [117]

    Shigeo S. Kimura. Chapter 9: Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts. pages 433–482, 2023. doi: 10.1142/9789811282645 0009

    2023 doi

  103. [118]

    Diffuse emission of high-energy neutrinos from gamma-ray burst fireballs.JCAP, 09:036, 2015

    Irene Tamborra and Shin’ichiro Ando. Diffuse emission of high-energy neutrinos from gamma-ray burst fireballs.JCAP, 09:036, 2015. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/9/036

    2015 doi

  104. [119]

    M. G. Aartsen et al. Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert.Science, 361(6398):147–151, 2018. doi: 10.1126/ science.aat2890

    2018

  105. [120]

    Giommi et al

    P. Giommi et al. Dissecting the regions around icecube high-energy neutrinos: growing evidence for the blazar connection.MNRAS, 497:865–878, 2020

    2020

  106. [121]

    R. U. Abbasi et al. An extremely energetic cosmic ray observed by a surface detector array.Science, 382(6673):abo5095, 2023. doi: 10.1126/science.abo5095. BIBLIOGRAPHY67

    2023 doi

  107. [122]

    Prince, S

    R. Prince, S. Das, N. Gupta, P. Majumdar, and Bozena Czerny.MNRAS, 527:8746–8754, 2024

    2024

  108. [123]

    Abbasi et al

    R. Abbasi et al. Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068. Science, 378(6619):538–543, 2022. doi: 10.1126/science.abg3395

    2022 doi

  109. [124]

    IceCube search for neutrinos from GRB 221009A.PoS, ICRC2023: 1511, 2023

    Rasha Abbasi et al. IceCube search for neutrinos from GRB 221009A.PoS, ICRC2023: 1511, 2023. doi: 10.22323/1.444.1511

    2023 doi

  110. [125]

    Kimura, and Ke Fang

    Kohta Murase, Mainak Mukhopadhyay, Ali Kheirandish, Shigeo S. Kimura, and Ke Fang. Neutrinos from the Brightest Gamma-Ray Burst?Astrophys. J. Lett., 941(1):L10, 2022. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca3ae

    2022 doi

  111. [127]

    High-energy neutrino emission from blazars.PoS, ICRC2021:030,

    Foteini Oikonomou. High-energy neutrino emission from blazars.PoS, ICRC2021:030,

  112. [128]

    Diffuse PeV neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts.Astro- phys

    Ruo-Yu Liu and Xiang-Yu Wang. Diffuse PeV neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts.Astro- phys. J., 766:73, 2013. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/73

    2013 doi

  113. [129]

    Padovani et al

    P. Padovani et al. Pks 1424+240: yet another masquerading bl lac object as a possible icecube neutrino source.MNARS, 511:4697–4701, 2022

    2022

  114. [130]

    Ackermann et al

    M. Ackermann et al. The spectrum of isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission between 100 MeV and 820 GeV.Astrophys. J., 799:86, 2015. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/86. 68BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2015 doi

  115. [132]

    Diffuse neutrinos from extragalactic supernova remnants: Dominating the 100 TeV IceCube flux.Phys

    Sovan Chakraborty and Ignacio Izaguirre. Diffuse neutrinos from extragalactic supernova remnants: Dominating the 100 TeV IceCube flux.Phys. Lett. B, 745:35–39, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.04.032

    2015 doi

  116. [133]

    First Search for High-Energy Neutrino Emission from Galaxy Mergers

    Subhadip Bouri, Priyank Parashari, Mousumi Das, and Ranjan Laha. First Search for High-Energy Neutrino Emission from Galaxy Mergers. 4 2024

    2024

  117. [134]

    Kimura, Kohta Murase, Imre Bartos, Kunihito Ioka, Ik Siong Heng, and Peter M´ esz´ aros

    Shigeo S. Kimura, Kohta Murase, Imre Bartos, Kunihito Ioka, Ik Siong Heng, and Peter M´ esz´ aros. Transejecta high-energy neutrino emission from binary neutron star mergers. Phys. Rev. D, 98(4):043020, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043020

    2018 doi

  118. [135]

    High-Energy Gamma Rays and Neutrinos from Nearby Radio Galaxies.JCAP, 12:017, 2017

    Carlos Blanco and Dan Hooper. High-Energy Gamma Rays and Neutrinos from Nearby Radio Galaxies.JCAP, 12:017, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/017

    2017 doi

  119. [136]

    Becker Tjus, B

    J. Becker Tjus, B. Eichmann, F. Halzen, A. Kheirandish, and S. M. Saba. High-energy neutrinos from radio galaxies.Phys. Rev. D, 89(12):123005, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 89.123005

    2014 doi

  120. [137]

    A deuterated liquid scintillator for supernova neutrino detection.JCAP, 11:005, 2021

    Bhavesh Chauhan, Basudeb Dasgupta, and Vivek Datar. A deuterated liquid scintillator for supernova neutrino detection.JCAP, 11:005, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/ 005

    2021 doi

  121. [138]

    High- energy Neutrinos from Choked Gamma-Ray Bursts in Active Galactic Nucleus Accretion Disks.Astrophys

    Jin-Ping Zhu, Kai Wang, Bing Zhang, Yuan-Pei Yang, Yun-Wei Yu, and He Gao. High- energy Neutrinos from Choked Gamma-Ray Bursts in Active Galactic Nucleus Accretion Disks.Astrophys. J. Lett., 911(2):L19, 2021. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c3

    2021 doi

  122. [139]

    Farrar and Andrei Gruzinov

    Glennys R. Farrar and Andrei Gruzinov. Giant AGN Flares and Cosmic Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J., 693:329–332, 2009. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/329

    2009 doi

  123. [140]

    Neutrinos from tidal disruption events

    Kimitake Hayasaki. Neutrinos from tidal disruption events. 2 2021. doi: 10.1038/ s41550-021-01309-z

    2021

  124. [141]

    Hugo Pfister, Martina Toscani, Thomas Hong Tsun Wong, Jane Lixin Dai, Giuseppe Lodato, and Elena M. Rossi. Observable gravitational waves from tidal disruption events and their electromagnetic counterpart.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 510(2):2025–2040,

    2025

  125. [142]

    A tidal disruption event coincident with a high-energy neutrino.Nature Astron., 5(5):510–518, 2021

    Robert Stein et al. A tidal disruption event coincident with a high-energy neutrino.Nature Astron., 5(5):510–518, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01295-8

    2021 doi

  126. [143]

    Candidate Tidal Disruption Event AT2019fdr Coincident with a High-Energy Neutrino.Phys

    Simeon Reusch et al. Candidate Tidal Disruption Event AT2019fdr Coincident with a High-Energy Neutrino.Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(22):221101, 2022. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.221101

    2022

  127. [144]

    A concordance scenario for the observed neu- trino from a tidal disruption event.Nature Astron., 5(5):472–477, 2021

    Walter Winter and Cecilia Lunardini. A concordance scenario for the observed neu- trino from a tidal disruption event.Nature Astron., 5(5):472–477, 2021. doi: 10.1038/ s41550-021-01343-x

    2021

  128. [145]

    Abbasi et al

    R. Abbasi et al. Measurement of the Anisotropy of Cosmic-ray Arrival Directions with IceCube.ApJL, 718(2):L194–L198, August 2010. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/L194

    2010 doi

  129. [146]

    M. G. Aartsen et al. Astrophysical neutrinos and cosmic rays observed by IceCube.Adv. Space Res., 62:2902–2930, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.030. BIBLIOGRAPHY69

    2018 doi

  130. [147]

    Martin J. Rees. Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 10 6-108 solar masses in nearby galaxies.Nature, 333(6173):523–528, June 1988. doi: 10.1038/333523a0

    1988 doi

  131. [148]

    X. X. Zhou. On temporal variations of the multi-tev cosmic ray anisotropy using the tibet iii air shower array.The Astrophysical Journal, 711(1):119–124, February 2010. ISSN 1538-4357. doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/711/1/119. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/0004-637X/711/1/119

    2010 doi

  132. [149]

    Cosmic ray anisotropy with 11 years of icecube data, 2023

    Frank McNally, Rasha Abbasi, Paolo Desiati, Juan Carlos D ´ ıaz V´ elez, Christina Cochling, Katherine Gruchot, William Hayes, Andrew Moy, Emily Schmidt, and Andrew Thorpe. Cosmic ray anisotropy with 11 years of icecube data, 2023

    2023

  133. [150]

    Desiati, M

    P. Desiati, M. Gurtner, K. H. Kampert, T. Karg, M. Santander, S. Westerhoff, and IceCube Collaboration. Study of the Time-dependence of the Cosmic-ray Anisotropy with AMANDA and IceCube. InInternational Cosmic Ray Conference, volume 33 of International Cosmic Ray Conference, p...

    2013

  134. [151]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3387

    doi

  135. [152]

    Gravitational waves.arXiv preprint gr-qc/9506086, 1995

    Kip S Thorne. Gravitational waves.arXiv preprint gr-qc/9506086, 1995

    1995 arXiv

  136. [153]

    Physics, astrophysics and cosmology with gravitational waves.Living reviews in relativity, 12:1–141, 2009

    Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash and Bernard F Schutz. Physics, astrophysics and cosmology with gravitational waves.Living reviews in relativity, 12:1–141, 2009

    2009

  137. [154]

    Ob- servation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Physical review letters, 116(6):061102, 2016

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, TDe Abbott, MR Abernathy, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, RX Adhikari, et al. Ob- servation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Physical review letters, 116(6):061102, 2016

    2016

  138. [155]

    Gw151226: observation of gravita- tional waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence.Physical review letters, 116(24):241103, 2016

    Benjamin P Abbott, R Abbott, TD Abbott, MR Abernathy, F Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, T Adams, P Addesso, RX Adhikari, et al. Gw151226: observation of gravita- tional waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence.Physical review letters, 116(24):241103, 2016

    2016

  139. [156]

    Gw170104: observation of a 50- solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2.Physical review letters, 118(22): 221101, 2017

    LIGO Scientific, Benjamin P Abbott, R Abbott, TD Abbott, F Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, T Adams, P Addesso, RX Adhikari, et al. Gw170104: observation of a 50- solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2.Physical review letters, 118(22): 221101, 2017

    2017

  140. [157]

    Time Variations in the Cosmic Ray Anisotropy

    Benjamin Pettee, Paolo Desiati, and Juan Carlos D ´ ıaz-V´ elez. Time Variations in the Cosmic Ray Anisotropy. InAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, volume 241 ofAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, page 207.04, January 2023

    2023

  141. [158]

    An ordinary short gamma-ray burst with extraordinary implications: Fermi-gbm detection of grb 170817a.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848(2):L14, 2017

    Adam Goldstein, P´ eter Veres, E Burns, MS Briggs, R Hamburg, D Kocevski, CA Wilson- Hodge, RD Preece, S Poolakkil, OJ Roberts, et al. An ordinary short gamma-ray burst with extraordinary implications: Fermi-gbm detection of grb 170817a.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848(2...

    2017

  142. [159]

    Probing gravity with spacetime sirens.The Astro- physical Journal, 668(2):L143, 2007

    Cedric Deffayet and Kristen Menou. Probing gravity with spacetime sirens.The Astro- physical Journal, 668(2):L143, 2007. 70BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2007

  143. [160]

    Anisotropic stress as a signature of nonstandard propagation of gravitational waves.Physical Review Letters, 113(19):191101, 2014

    Ippocratis D Saltas, Ignacy Sawicki, Luca Amendola, and Martin Kunz. Anisotropic stress as a signature of nonstandard propagation of gravitational waves.Physical Review Letters, 113(19):191101, 2014

    2014

  144. [161]

    Amenomori et al

    M. Amenomori et al. Observation by an air-shower array in tibet of the multi-tev cosmic- ray anisotropy due to terrestrial orbital motion around the sun.Physical Review Letters, 93(6), August 2004. ISSN 1079-7114. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.061101. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.11...

    2004 doi

  145. [162]

    Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories.Physical review D, 97(10):104066, 2018

    Enis Belgacem, Yves Dirian, Stefano Foffa, and Michele Maggiore. Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories.Physical review D, 97(10):104066, 2018

    2018

  146. [163]

    Modified gravitational- wave propagation and standard sirens.Physical review D, 98(2):023510, 2018

    Enis Belgacem, Yves Dirian, Stefano Foffa, and Michele Maggiore. Modified gravitational- wave propagation and standard sirens.Physical review D, 98(2):023510, 2018

    2018

  147. [164]

    Breaking a dark degeneracy with gravitational waves

    Lucas Lombriser and Andy Taylor. Breaking a dark degeneracy with gravitational waves. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016(03):031, 2016

    2016

  148. [165]

    Challenges to self-acceleration in modified gravity from gravitational waves and large-scale structure.Physics Letters B, 765:382–385, 2017

    Lucas Lombriser and Nelson A Lima. Challenges to self-acceleration in modified gravity from gravitational waves and large-scale structure.Physics Letters B, 765:382–385, 2017

    2017

  149. [166]

    Nine-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: cosmological parameter results.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 208(2):19, 2013

    Gary Hinshaw, D Larson, Eiichiro Komatsu, David N Spergel, CLaa Bennett, Joanna Dunkley, MR Nolta, M Halpern, RS Hill, N Odegard, et al. Nine-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: cosmological parameter results.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Seri...

    2013

  150. [167]

    Gw170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical review letters, 119(16):161101, 2017

    Benjamin P Abbott, Rich Abbott, TDea Abbott, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, RX Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical review letters, 119(16):161101, 2017

    2017

  151. [168]

    The atacama cosmology telescope: the polarization-sensitive actpol instrument.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 227(2):21, 2016

    RJ Thornton, PAR Ade, S Aiola, FE Angile, M Amiri, JA Beall, DT Becker, HM Cho, SK Choi, P Corlies, et al. The atacama cosmology telescope: the polarization-sensitive actpol instrument.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 227(2):21, 2016

    2016

  152. [169]

    The design and integrated performance of spt-3g.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 258(2):42, 2022

    JA Sobrin, AJ Anderson, AN Bender, BA Benson, D Dutcher, A Foster, N Goeckner- Wald, J Montgomery, A Nadolski, A Rahlin, et al. The design and integrated performance of spt-3g.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 258(2):42, 2022

    2022

  153. [170]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2021 doi

  154. [171]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation

    Atsushi Nishizawa. Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. i. formulation.Physical Review D, 97(10):104037, 2018

    2018

  155. [172]

    Balkenhol et al

    L. Balkenhol et al. Measurement of the CMB temperature power spectrum and constraints on cosmology from the SPT-3G 2018 TT, TE, and EE dataset.Phys. Rev. D, 108(2): 023510, 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.023510

    2018 doi

  156. [173]

    A. G. Riess et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team.ApJL, 934(1):L7, July 2022. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

    2022 doi

  157. [174]

    A. G. Adame et al. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations.2404.03002, 4 2024. BIBLIOGRAPHY71

    2024 arXiv

  158. [175]

    Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with lisa standard sirens

    Enis Belgacem, Gianluca Calcagni, Marco Crisostomi, Charles Dalang, Yves Dirian, Jose Mar ´ ıa Ezquiaga, Matteo Fasiello, Stefano Foffa, Alexander Ganz, Juan Garc ´ ıa- Bellido, et al. Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with lisa standard sirens. Journal of Cos...

    2019

  159. [176]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review.Rept

    Tsutomu Kobayashi. Horndeski theory and beyond: a review.Rept. Prog. Phys., 82(8): 086901, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ab2429

    2019 doi

  160. [177]

    Planck 2018 results-vi

    Nabila Aghanim, Yashar Akrami, Mark Ashdown, J Aumont, C Baccigalupi, M Ballardini, AJ Banday, RB Barreiro, N Bartolo, S Basak, et al. Planck 2018 results-vi. cosmological parameters.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641:A6, 2020

    2018

  161. [178]

    Current and future constraints on cosmology and modified grav- itational wave friction from binary black holes.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(09):012, 2022

    Konstantin Leyde, Simone Mastrogiovanni, Dani` ele A Steer, Eric Chassande-Mottin, and Christos Karathanasis. Current and future constraints on cosmology and modified grav- itational wave friction from binary black holes.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(09)...

    2022

  162. [179]

    Cosmology with LIGO/Virgo dark sirens: Hubble parameter and modified gravi- tational wave propagation.JCAP, 08:026, 2021

    Andreas Finke, Stefano Foffa, Francesco Iacovelli, Michele Maggiore, and Michele Man- carella. Cosmology with LIGO/Virgo dark sirens: Hubble parameter and modified gravi- tational wave propagation.JCAP, 08:026, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/026

    2021 doi

  163. [180]

    Testing the nature of gravitational wave propagation using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues.JCAP, 02:035, 2024

    Anson Chen, Rachel Gray, and Tessa Baker. Testing the nature of gravitational wave propagation using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues.JCAP, 02:035, 2024. doi: 10.1088/ 1475-7516/2024/02/035

    2024

  164. [181]

    Madhavacheril et al

    Mathew S. Madhavacheril et al. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters.Astrophys. J., 962(2):113, 2024. doi: 10. 3847/1538-4357/acff5f

    2024

  165. [182]

    A model-independent precision test of gen- eral relativity using bright standard sirens from ongoing and upcoming detectors.Mon

    Samsuzzaman Afroz and Suvodip Mukherjee. A model-independent precision test of gen- eral relativity using bright standard sirens from ongoing and upcoming detectors.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 530(4):3812–3826, 2024. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae951

    2024 doi

  166. [183]

    A New Model-Independent Precision Test of General Relativity using LISA Bright Standard Sirens.JCAP, 6 2024

    Samsuzzaman Afroz and Suvodip Mukherjee. A New Model-Independent Precision Test of General Relativity using LISA Bright Standard Sirens.JCAP, 6 2024

    2024

  167. [184]

    Prospect of Precision Cosmology and Test- ing General Relativity using Binary Black Holes- Galaxies Cross-correlation.MNRAS, 7 2024

    Samsuzzaman Afroz and Suvodip Mukherjee. Prospect of Precision Cosmology and Test- ing General Relativity using Binary Black Holes- Galaxies Cross-correlation.MNRAS, 7 2024

    2024

  168. [185]

    Clifford M. Will. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment.Living Rev. Rel., 17:4, 2014. doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4

    2014 doi

  169. [186]

    Weinstein

    Maximiliano Isi and Alan J. Weinstein. Probing gravitational wave polarizations with signals from compact binary coalescences. 10 2017

    2017

  170. [187]

    Wandelt, and Joseph Silk

    Suvodip Mukherjee, Benjamin D. Wandelt, and Joseph Silk. Testing the general theory of relativity using gravitational wave propagation from dark standard sirens.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 502(1):1136–1144, 2021. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab001

    2021 doi

  171. [188]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett., 848(2):L12, 2017. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    2017 doi

  172. [189]

    Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA stan- dard sirens.JCAP, 07:024, 2019

    Enis Belgacem et al. Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA stan- dard sirens.JCAP, 07:024, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/024. 72BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2019 doi

  173. [190]

    Curt Cutler and Daniel E. Holz. Ultra-high precision cosmology from gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D, 80:104009, 2009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.104009

    2009 doi

  174. [191]

    Constraining Scalar-Tensor Modified Gravity with Gravitational Waves and Large Scale Structure Surveys.JCAP, 01:068, 2021

    Tessa Baker and Ian Harrison. Constraining Scalar-Tensor Modified Gravity with Gravitational Waves and Large Scale Structure Surveys.JCAP, 01:068, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/068

    2021 doi

  175. [192]

    Holz, John Miller, Matthew Evans, Salvatore Vitale, and Jolien Creighton

    Hsin-Yu Chen, Daniel E. Holz, John Miller, Matthew Evans, Salvatore Vitale, and Jolien Creighton. Distance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology.Class. Quant. Grav., 38(5):055010, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/abd594

    2021 doi

  176. [193]

    The observational signatures of supermas- sive black hole seeds.MNRAS, 481(3):3278–3292, December 2018

    Angelo Ricarte and Priyamvada Natarajan. The observational signatures of supermas- sive black hole seeds.MNRAS, 481(3):3278–3292, December 2018. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ sty2448

    2018 doi

  177. [194]

    Simcoe, Ruari Mackenzie, Jorryt Matthee, Daichi Kashino, Rongmon Bordoloi, Simon J

    Minghao Yue, Anna-Christina Eilers, Robert A. Simcoe, Ruari Mackenzie, Jorryt Matthee, Daichi Kashino, Rongmon Bordoloi, Simon J. Lilly, and Rohan P. Naidu. EIGER. V. Characterizing the Host Galaxies of Luminous Quasars at z≳6.ApJ, 966 (2):176, May 2024. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3914

    2024 doi

  178. [195]

    Advanced ligo

    Junaid Aasi, BP Abbott, Richard Abbott, Thomas Abbott, MR Abernathy, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, RX Adhikari, et al. Advanced ligo. Classical and quantum gravity, 32(7):074001, 2015

    2015

  179. [196]

    Advanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(2):024001, 2014

    Fet al Acernese, M Agathos, K Agatsuma, Damiano Aisa, N Allemandou, Aea Allocca, J Amarni, Pia Astone, G Balestri, G Ballardin, et al. Advanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(2):024001, 2014

    2014

  180. [197]

    Michele Maggiore.Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0-19-171766-6, 978-0-19-852074-0. doi: 10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    2007

  181. [198]

    Cosmic explorer: the us contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond ligo.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04833, 2019

    David Reitze, Rana X Adhikari, Stefan Ballmer, Barry Barish, Lisa Barsotti, GariLynn Billingsley, Duncan A Brown, Yanbei Chen, Dennis Coyne, Robert Eisenstein, et al. Cosmic explorer: the us contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond ligo.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04833, 2019

    1907 arXiv

  182. [199]

    The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravita- tional wave observatory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27(19):194002, 2010

    M Punturo, M Abernathy, F Acernese, B Allen, Nils Andersson, K Arun, F Barone, B Barr, M Barsuglia, M Beker, et al. The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravita- tional wave observatory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27(19):194002, 2010

    2010

  183. [200]

    Laser interferometer space antenna.arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00786, 2017

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, Enrico Barausse, Peter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Pierre Binetruy, Michael Born, Daniele Bortoluzzi, et al. Laser interferometer space antenna.arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00786, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  184. [201]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation

    Shun Arai and Atsushi Nishizawa. Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. II. Constraints on Horndeski theory.Phys. Rev. D, 97 (10):104038, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104038

    2018 doi

  185. [202]

    Leszek Roszkowski, Sessolo Enrico Maria, and Sebastian Trojanowski.Rep. Prog. Phys., 81:066201, 2018

    2018

  186. [203]

    Jennifer M. Gaskins. A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter.Con- temp.Phys., 57:496–525, 2016

    2016

  187. [204]

    Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the milky way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of fermi-lat data.Phys

    Alex McDaniel et al. Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the milky way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of fermi-lat data.Phys. Rev. D, 109:063024, 2024. BIBLIOGRAPHY73

    2024

  188. [205]

    Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of magic and fermi-lat observations of dwarf satellite galaxies.JCAP, 02:039, 2016

    MAGIC Collaboration. Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of magic and fermi-lat observations of dwarf satellite galaxies.JCAP, 02:039, 2016

    2016

  189. [206]

    Boezio et al

    M. Boezio et al. Pamela and indirect dark matter searches.New Journal of Physics, 11, 2009

    2009

  190. [207]

    Overview of kagra: Detector design and construction history.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A101, 2021

    T Akutsu, M Ando, K Arai, Y Arai, S Araki, A Araya, N Aritomi, Y Aso, S Bae, Y Bae, et al. Overview of kagra: Detector design and construction history.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A101, 2021

    2021

  191. [208]

    Aguilar, G

    M. Aguilar, G. Alberti, B. Alpat, A. Alvino, G. Ambrosi, K. Andeen, H. Anderhub, L. Ar- ruda, P. Azzarello, A. Bachlechner, F. Barao, B. Baret, A. Barrau, L. Barrin, A. Bar- toloni, L. Basara, A. Basili, L. Batalha, J. Bates, R. Battiston, J. Bazo, R. Becker, U. Becker, M. Beh...

    2013

  192. [209]

    Osteria and GAPS Collaboration

    G. Osteria and GAPS Collaboration. GAPS: A balloon-borne cosmic-ray antimatter experiment.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 958:162201, April

  193. [210]

    Nelson, and Sanjay Reddy

    Bridget Bertoni, Ann E. Nelson, and Sanjay Reddy. Dark matter thermalization in neu- tron stars.Phys. Rev. D, 88:123505, Dec 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.123505. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.123505

    2013 doi

  194. [211]

    Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite

    Luca Amendola et al. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite. Living Rev. Rel., 21(1):2, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3

    2018 doi

  195. [212]

    C. J. Horowitz and Sanjay Reddy. Gravitational waves from compact dark objects in neutron stars.Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:071102, Feb 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122. 071102. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.071102

    2019 doi

  196. [213]

    Nelson, Sanjay Reddy, and Dake Zhou

    David McKeen, Ann E. Nelson, Sanjay Reddy, and Dake Zhou. Neutron Stars Ex- clude Light Dark Baryons.Phys.Rev.Lett, 121(6):061802, August 2018. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.061802

    2018

  197. [214]

    Berryman, Susan Gardner, and Mohammadreza Zakeri

    Jeffrey M. Berryman, Susan Gardner, and Mohammadreza Zakeri. How macroscopic limits on neutron-star baryon loss yield microscopic limits on non-standard-model baryon decay.Phys. Rev. D, 109:023021, Jan 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023021. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.110...

    2024 doi

  198. [215]

    Motta, and Anthony W

    Wasif Husain, Theo F. Motta, and Anthony W. Thomas. Consequences of neutron decay inside neutron stars.JCAP, 2022(10):028, October 2022. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/ 10/028

    2022 doi

  199. [216]

    R-modes as a new probe of dark matter in neutron stars.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(12):008, December 2023

    Swarnim Shirke, Suprovo Ghosh, Debarati Chatterjee, Laura Sagunski, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich. R-modes as a new probe of dark matter in neutron stars.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(12):008, December 2023. doi: 10.1088/ 1475-7516/2023/12/008

    2023

  200. [217]

    Status, challenges and directions in indirect dark matter searches.Symmetry, 12:10, 2020

    Carlos P´ erez de los Heros. Status, challenges and directions in indirect dark matter searches.Symmetry, 12:10, 2020

    2020

  201. [218]

    Pulsar timing array experiments

    JPW Verbiest, S Os lowski, and S Burke-Spolaor. Pulsar timing array experiments. In Handbook of gravitational wave astronomy, pages 157–198. Springer, 2022

    2022

  202. [219]

    Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30(22):224014, 2013

    A Sesana. Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30(22):224014, 2013. BIBLIOGRAPHY75

    2013

  203. [220]

    V Ravi, JSB Wyithe, RM Shannon, and G Hobbs. Prospects for gravitational-wave detection and supermassive black hole astrophysics with pulsar timing arrays.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447(3):2772–2783, 2015

    2015

  204. [221]

    The astrophysics of nanohertz gravitational waves.The Astronomy and astrophysics review, 27:1–78, 2019

    Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Stephen R Taylor, Maria Charisi, Timothy Dolch, Jeffrey S Hazboun, A Miguel Holgado, Luke Zoltan Kelley, T Joseph W Lazio, Dustin R Madi- son, Natasha McMann, et al. The astrophysics of nanohertz gravitational waves.The Astronomy and astrophysics review, 2...

    2019

  205. [222]

    Miller, and Anupam Ray

    Sulagna Bhattacharya, Andrew L. Miller, and Anupam Ray. Continuous gravitational waves: A new window to look for heavy nonannihilating dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 110: 043006, Aug 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043006. URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043006

    2024 doi

  206. [223]

    The unanticipated phenomenology of the blazar pks 2131–021: a unique supermassive black hole binary candidate.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 926(2):L35, 2022

    S O’neill, S Kiehlmann, ACS Readhead, MF Aller, RD Blandford, I Liodakis, ML Lister, P Mr´ oz, CP O’dea, TJ Pearson, et al. The unanticipated phenomenology of the blazar pks 2131–021: a unique supermassive black hole binary candidate.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 926(2):L35, 2022

    2022

  207. [224]

    Discovering the cosmic evolution of supermas- sive black holes using nano-hertz gravitational waves and galaxy surveys.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11669, 2024

    Mohit Raj Sah and Suvodip Mukherjee. Discovering the cosmic evolution of supermas- sive black holes using nano-hertz gravitational waves and galaxy surveys.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11669, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  208. [225]

    Massive black hole binaries in lisa: multimessenger prospects and electromagnetic counterparts.Physical Review D, 106(10):103017, 2022

    Alberto Mangiagli, Chiara Caprini, Marta Volonteri, Sylvain Marsat, Susanna Vergani, Nicola Tamanini, and Henri Inchausp´ e. Massive black hole binaries in lisa: multimessenger prospects and electromagnetic counterparts.Physical Review D, 106(10):103017, 2022

    2022

  209. [226]

    The north american nanohertz observatory for gravitational waves

    Maura A McLaughlin. The north american nanohertz observatory for gravitational waves. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30(22):224008, 2013

    2013

  210. [227]

    High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the european pulsar timing array.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458(3):3341–3380, 2016

    G Desvignes, RN Caballero, L Lentati, JPW Verbiest, DJ Champion, BW Stappers, GH Janssen, P Lazarus, S Os lowski, S Babak, et al. High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the european pulsar timing array.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458(3):334...

    2016

  211. [228]

    Effects of dark matter on f-mode oscillations of neutron stars

    Swarnim Shirke, Bikram Keshari Pradhan, Debarati Chatterjee, Laura Sagunski, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich. Effects of dark matter on f-mode oscillations of neutron stars. Phys.Rev.D, 110(6):063025, September 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063025

    2024 doi

  212. [229]

    Searching for the nano- hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the chinese pulsar timing array data release i.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16216, 2023

    Heng Xu, Siyuan Chen, Yanjun Guo, Jinchen Jiang, Bojun Wang, Jiangwei Xu, Zihan Xue, R Nicolas Caballero, Jianping Yuan, Yonghua Xu, et al. Searching for the nano- hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the chinese pulsar timing array data release i.arXiv preprint...

    2023 arXiv

  213. [230]

    Exploring the spectrum of stochas- tic gravitational-wave anisotropies with pulsar timing arrays.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05690, 2023

    Gabriela Sato-Polito and Marc Kamionkowski. Exploring the spectrum of stochas- tic gravitational-wave anisotropies with pulsar timing arrays.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05690, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  214. [231]

    Be- yond the background: Gravitational-wave anisotropy and continuous waves from super- massive black hole binaries.The Astrophysical Journal, 965(2):164, 2024

    Emiko C Gardiner, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Anna-Malin Lemke, and Andrea Mitridate. Be- yond the background: Gravitational-wave anisotropy and continuous waves from super- massive black hole binaries.The Astrophysical Journal, 965(2):164, 2024

    2024

  215. [232]

    Imprints of supermassive black hole evolution on the spectral and spatial anisotropy of nano-hertz stochastic gravitational-wave background.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14508, 2024

    Mohit Raj Sah, Suvodip Mukherjee, Vida Saeedzadeh, Arif Babul, Michael Tremmel, and Thomas R Quinn. Imprints of supermassive black hole evolution on the spectral and spatial anisotropy of nano-hertz stochastic gravitational-wave background.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14508, 2024...

    2024 arXiv

  216. [233]

    Lankeswar Dey, MJ Valtonen, A Gopakumar, S Zola, R Hudec, P Pihajoki, S Ciprini, K Matsumoto, K Sadakane, M Kidger, et al. Authenticating the presence of a relativistic massive black hole binary in oj 287 using its general relativity centenary flare: Improved orbital parameter...

    2018

  217. [234]

    A precision calculation of relic neutrino decou- pling.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(08):012, 2020

    Kensuke Akita and Masahide Yamaguchi. A precision calculation of relic neutrino decou- pling.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(08):012, 2020

    2020

  218. [235]

    Neutrino decoupling in the early universe.Physical Review D, 52(4):1764, 1995

    Steen Hannestad and Jes Madsen. Neutrino decoupling in the early universe.Physical Review D, 52(4):1764, 1995

    1995

  219. [236]

    Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003

    Scott Dodelson.Modern Cosmology. Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003. ISBN 978-0-12- 219141-1

    2003

  220. [237]

    G. G. Raffelt.Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles. 5 1996. ISBN 978-0-226-70272-8

    1996

  221. [238]

    Planck 2015 results- xiii

    Peter AR Ade, Nabila Aghanim, M Arnaud, Mark Ashdown, J Aumont, Carlo Bacci- galupi, AJ Banday, RB Barreiro, JG Bartlett, Nicola Bartolo, et al. Planck 2015 results- xiii. cosmological parameters.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594:A13, 2016

    2015

  222. [239]

    The parkes pulsar timing array project

    RN Manchester, G Hobbs, M Bailes, W A Coles, W Van Straten, MJ Keith, RM Shannon, NDR Bhat, A Brown, SG Burke-Spolaor, et al. The parkes pulsar timing array project. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 30:e017, 2013

    2013

  223. [242]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, and et al. Tests of General Relativity with GW170817.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(1):011102, July 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123. 011102

    2019 doi

  224. [243]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, and et al. A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant.Nature, 551(7678):85–88, November 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature24471

    2017 doi

  225. [244]

    Pulsar searches and timing with the square kilometre array.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 493(3):1161–1170, 2009

    R Smits, M Kramer, B Stappers, DR Lorimer, J Cordes, and A Faulkner. Pulsar searches and timing with the square kilometre array.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 493(3):1161–1170, 2009

    2009

  226. [245]

    Lattimer, Duncan A

    Soumi De, Daniel Finstad, James M. Lattimer, Duncan A. Brown, Edo Berger, and Christopher M. Biwer. Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Ob- servation of GW170817.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(9):091102, August 2018. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.091102

    2018

  227. [246]

    Constraining the neutron-matter equation of state with gravitational waves.Phys

    Michael McNeil Forbes, Sukanta Bose, Sanjay Reddy, Dake Zhou, Arunava Mukherjee, and Soumi De. Constraining the neutron-matter equation of state with gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. D, 100(8):083010, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083010. BIBLIOGRAPHY77

    2019 doi

  228. [247]

    Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State.Phys

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Aleksi Kurkela, and Aleksi Vuorinen. Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(17): 172703, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.172703

    2018 doi

  229. [248]

    Tidal Love Numbers of Neutron Stars.ApJ, 677(2):1216–1220, April

    Tanja Hinderer. Tidal Love Numbers of Neutron Stars.ApJ, 677(2):1216–1220, April

  230. [249]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, and et al. Psr j0030+0451 mass and radius from nicer data and implications for the properties of neutron star matter.The Astrophysical...

    2019 doi

  231. [250]

    Baracchini et al

    E. Baracchini et al. PTOLEMY: A Proposal for Thermal Relic Detection of Massive Neutrinos and Directional Detection of MeV Dark Matter. 8 2018

    2018

  232. [251]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Ar- zoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, and et al. A nicer view of psr j0030+0451: Millisecond pulsar parameter estimation.The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 887(1):L21, Dec 2019. ISSN 2...

    2019 doi

  233. [252]

    T. E. Riley et al. A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy, 2021

    2021

  234. [253]

    A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant.Nature Astronomy, 6:1444– 1451, December 2022

    Victor Doroshenko, Valery Suleimanov, Gerd P¨ uhlhofer, and Andrea Santangelo. A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant.Nature Astronomy, 6:1444– 1451, December 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01800-1

    2022 doi

  235. [254]

    doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/aa920c

    Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: Gw170817 and grb 170817a.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848(2):L13, oct 2017. doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/aa920c. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c

    2017 doi

  236. [255]

    Wolf and Macarena Lagos

    William J. Wolf and Macarena Lagos. Standard sirens as a novel probe of dark energy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:061101, Feb 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.061101. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.061101

    2020 doi

  237. [256]

    Raaijmakers, S

    G. Raaijmakers, S. K. Greif, K. Hebeler, T. Hinderer, S. Nissanke, A. Schwenk, T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, J. M. Lattimer, and W. C. G. Ho. Constraints on the dense matter equation of state and neutron star properties from nicer’s mass–radius estimate of psr j0740+6620 and multi...

    2021 doi

  238. [257]

    Huth et al

    S. Huth et al. Constraining Neutron-Star Matter with Microscopic and Macroscopic Collisions.Nature, 606:276–280, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04750-w

    2022 doi

  239. [258]

    Imposing multi- physics constraints at different densities on the neutron star equation of state.The Eu- ropean Physical Journal A, 58(3), February 2022

    Suprovo Ghosh, Debarati Chatterjee, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich. Imposing multi- physics constraints at different densities on the neutron star equation of state.The Eu- ropean Physical Journal A, 58(3), February 2022. ISSN 1434-601X. doi: 10.1140/epja/ s10050-022-00679-w. ...

    2022 doi

  240. [260]

    Piotr Jaranowski, Andrzej Kr´ olak, and Bernard F. Schutz. Data analysis of gravitational- wave signals from spinning neutron stars: The signal and its detection.Phys.Rev.D, 58 (6):063001, September 1998. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.063001

    1998 doi

  241. [261]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Manthripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pol- lard, I. Cogna...

    2021

  242. [262]

    Directed searches for continuous gravitational waves from binary systems: Parameter-space metrics and optimal scorpius x-1 sensitivity.Phys

    Paola Leaci and Reinhard Prix. Directed searches for continuous gravitational waves from binary systems: Parameter-space metrics and optimal scorpius x-1 sensitivity.Phys. Rev. D, 91:102003, May 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.102003. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRe...

    2015 doi

  243. [263]

    Accretion-induced spin-wandering effects on the neutron star in Scorpius X-1: Implications for continuous gravitational wave searches.Phys.Rev.D, 97(4):043016, February 2018

    Arunava Mukherjee, Chris Messenger, and Keith Riles. Accretion-induced spin-wandering effects on the neutron star in Scorpius X-1: Implications for continuous gravitational wave searches.Phys.Rev.D, 97(4):043016, February 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043016

    2018 doi

  244. [264]

    Implementation of a new WEA VE- based search pipeline for continuous gravitational waves from known binary systems

    Arunava Mukherjee, Reinhard Prix, and Karl Wette. Implementation of a new WEA VE- based search pipeline for continuous gravitational waves from known binary systems. Phys.Rev.D, 107(6):062005, March 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.062005

    2023 doi

  245. [265]

    Searches for continuous-wave gravitational radiation.Living Reviews in Relativity, 26(1):3, Apr 2023

    Keith Riles. Searches for continuous-wave gravitational radiation.Living Reviews in Relativity, 26(1):3, Apr 2023. ISSN 1433-8351. doi: 10.1007/s41114-023-00044-3. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-023-00044-3

    2023 doi

  246. [266]

    Abbott, R

    B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R.X. Adhikari, V.B. Adya, and et al. Gw170817: Measurements of neu- tron star radii and equation of state.Physical Review Letters, 121(16), Oct 2018. ISSN 1079-7114. doi: 10.1103/physr...

    2018 doi

  247. [267]

    Constraining nuclear parameters using gravitational waves from f-mode oscillations in neutron stars.The As- trophysical Journal, 956(1):38, October 2023

    Bikram Keshari Pradhan, Dhruv Pathak, and Debarati Chatterjee. Constraining nuclear parameters using gravitational waves from f-mode oscillations in neutron stars.The As- trophysical Journal, 956(1):38, October 2023. ISSN 1538-4357. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ acef1f. URLhttp://dx...

    2023 doi

  248. [268]

    ¡mml:math xmlns:mml=”http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml”¿¡mml:mi¿g¡/mml:mi¿¡/mml:math¿ -mode oscillations in neutron stars with hyperons.Physical Review C, 108 (1), July 2023

    Vinh Tran, Suprovo Ghosh, Nicholas Lozano, De- barati Chatterjee, and Prashanth Jaikumar. ¡mml:math xmlns:mml=”http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml”¿¡mml:mi¿g¡/mml:mi¿¡/mml:math¿ -mode oscillations in neutron stars with hyperons.Physical Review C, 108 (1), July 2023. ISSN 2469-9...

    1998 doi

  249. [269]

    URL http://www.ncra.tifr.res.in/ncra/gmrt

    http://www.ncra.tifr.res.in/ncra/gmrt, Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (2023). URL http://www.ncra.tifr.res.in/ncra/gmrt

    2023

  250. [270]

    The X-ray Polarimetry Satellite XPoSat

    Biswajit Paul. The X-ray Polarimetry Satellite XPoSat. In44th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 16-24 July, volume 44, page 1853, July 2022

    2022

  251. [271]

    URL https://www.isro.gov.in/XPoSat.html

    X-ray Polarimeter Satellite (XPoSat), https://www.isro.gov.in/XPoSat.html, 2023. URL https://www.isro.gov.in/XPoSat.html. BIBLIOGRAPHY79

    2023

  252. [273]

    Brady and Teviet Creighton

    Patrick R. Brady and Teviet Creighton. Searching for periodic sources with ligo. ii. hierarchical searches.Phys. Rev. D, 61:082001, Feb 2000. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.61. 082001. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.082001

    doi

  253. [274]

    Gwtc-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the second part of the third observing run.Phys. Rev. X, 13:041039, Dec 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX. 13.041039. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    2023 doi

  254. [275]

    Multi-messenger observations of binary neutron star mergers in the o4 run.The Astrophysical Journal, 937(2):79, sep 2022

    Alberto Colombo, Om Sharan Salafia, Francesco Gabrielli, Giancarlo Ghirlanda, Bruno Giacomazzo, Albino Perego, and Monica Colpi. Multi-messenger observations of binary neutron star mergers in the o4 run.The Astrophysical Journal, 937(2):79, sep 2022. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8...

    2022 doi

  255. [276]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel. Bounds on exotic-particle interactions from SN 1987A.Physical Review Letters, 60(18):1793–1796, January 1988

    1988

  256. [277]

    Bikram Keshari Pradhan, Debarati Chatterjee, Michael Lanoye, and Prashanth Jaikumar. General relativistic treatment of ¡mml:math xmlns:mml=”http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml”¿¡mml:mi¿f¡/mml:mi¿¡/mml:math¿ -mode oscillations of hyperonic stars.Physical Review C, 106(1), July 2...

    1998

  257. [278]

    Wasif Husain, Dipan Sengupta, and A. W. Thomas. Constraining Dark Boson Decay Using Neutron Stars.Universe, 9(7):307, June 2023. doi: 10.3390/universe9070307

    2023 doi

  258. [279]

    India-based neutrino observatory - project report: Volume i,

    The INO Collaboration. India-based neutrino observatory - project report: Volume i,

  259. [280]

    Capano, Ingo Tews, Stephanie M

    Collin D. Capano, Ingo Tews, Stephanie M. Brown, Ben Margalit, Soumi De, Sumit Ku- mar, Duncan A. Brown, Badri Krishnan, and Sanjay Reddy. Stringent constraints on neutron-star radii from multimessenger observations and nuclear theory.Nature Astron- omy, 4:625–632, March 2020....

    2020 doi

  260. [281]

    Coughlin, Peter T

    Tim Dietrich, Michael W. Coughlin, Peter T. H. Pang, Mattia Bulla, Jack Heinzel, Lina Issa, Ingo Tews, and Sarah Antier. Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equa- tion of state and the Hubble constant.Science, 370(6523):1450–1453, December 2020. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4317

    2020 doi

  261. [282]

    Williams, and Ik Siong Heng

    Jordan McGinn, Arunava Mukherjee, Jessica Irwin, Christopher Messenger, Michael J. Williams, and Ik Siong Heng. Rapid neutron star equation of state inference with Nor- malising Flows.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2403.17462, March 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2403.17462

    2024 doi arXiv

  262. [283]

    Thibeau Wouters, Peter T. H. Pang, Tim Dietrich, and Chris Van Den Broeck. Robust parameter estimation within minutes on gravitational wave signals from binary neutron star inspirals.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2404.11397, April 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2404.11397

    2024 doi

  263. [284]

    Bhalerao et al

    V. Bhalerao et al. Science with the Daksha high energy transients mission.Experimental Astronomy, 57(3):23, June 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10686-024-09923-1

    2024 doi

  264. [285]

    The Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna: Mission Studies and Science Case

    Parameswaran Ajith et al. The Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna: Mission Studies and Science Case. 4 2024. 80BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2024

  265. [286]

    Gravitational-Wave Lunar Observatory for Cosmology

    Karan Jani and Abraham Loeb. Gravitational-Wave Lunar Observatory for Cosmology. 7 2020. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/044

    2020 doi

  266. [289]

    Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly.Physical Review Letters, 120(19):191801, May 2018

    Bartosz Fornal and Benjam ´ ın Grinstein. Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly.Physical Review Letters, 120(19):191801, May 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 120.191801

    2018 doi

  267. [297]

    Ackley et al

    K. Ackley et al. Neutron Star Extreme Matter Observatory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network.Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., 37:e047,

  268. [298]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.39

    2020 doi

  269. [1966]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.16.748

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.748. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.16.748

    doi

  270. [2003]

    doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)00425-X

    doi

  271. [2006]

    URLhttps://www.ino.tifr.res.in/ino/OpenReports/INOReport.pdf

  272. [2015]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0037

    doi

  273. [2016]

    doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/084001

    doi

  274. [2018]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad083

    doi

  275. [2020]

    doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.05.042

    2019 doi

  276. [2022]

    doi: 10.22323/1.395.0030

    doi

  277. [2023]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf2ec

    doi

  278. [2024]

    doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13137-2

    doi

  279. [9993]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC

    doi: 10.1103/physrevc.106.015805. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 106.015805

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.