Polariton-mediated light emission induced by electric current flow in nanostructured polyaniline

Ewelina Frackowiak; Jerzy J. Langer; Katarzyna Ratajczak

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Polariton-mediated light emission induced by electric current flow in nanostructured polyaniline

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that electric current through nanostructured polyaniline produces exciton-polariton condensation and laser-like emission at 643 nm, with 80-90% of the electrical energy converted to light.

desk verdict Unusual electroluminescence observations in polyaniline, but the exciton-polariton condensation claim is unsupported by any strong-coupling evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24738 v1 pith:P66SHBDD submitted 2025-05-30 cond-mat.mes-hall

Jerzy J. Langer , Ewelina Frackowiak , Katarzyna Ratajczak This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords exciton-polaritonspolyanilineelectroluminescencepolaritoncondensationorganicmicrocavitystrongcouplinglaser-likeemissionconductingpolymernanostructures

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a conducting polymer, nanostructured polyaniline pressed into a small pellet, can convert electric current into laser-like light through exciton-polariton condensation (EPC). Above a threshold current, the authors observe a sharp switch from weak, current-squared emission to intense, directional, nearly monochromatic red emission at 643 nm, together with sudden increases in electrical conductivity and about 1 MHz voltage oscillations. They interpret these observations as evidence that current-generated excitons couple to photons inside randomly distributed optical microcavities, form exciton-polaritons, and condense into a single coherent state. If true, this would be an electrically powered polariton polymer laser made from a cheap, strongly absorbing material, with a claimed electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency of 80-90% and a predicted luminous efficacy near 600 lm/W. The paper is explicit that its experiments indicate possible EPC, not that condensation is directly proven.

What carries the argument

The central object is the exciton-polariton condensate (EPC): a collective state of exciton-polaritons, quasiparticles formed by strong coupling between photons and excitons, with an effective mass roughly $10^{-4}$ times the electron mass, which can Bose-condense at room temperature. In this paper the cavity that should produce strong coupling is not a fabricated Fabry-Pérot resonator but a stimulated-transparency mechanism: the authors propose that excitons and photons generated inside normally absorbing polyaniline locally suppress absorption, creating randomly distributed optical microcavities among the polymer nanowires. The condensation is invoked to explain the threshold behavior, the line narrowing at 643 nm, the linear intensity-versus-current dependence above threshold, the sharp sub-1 V ON-OFF bistability, the roughly 1 MHz conductance oscillations, and the magnetic-field and external-light sensitivity of the emission.

What would settle it

Measure the angle-resolved reflection or emission spectrum of a polyaniline pellet while it is emitting at 643 nm: if the lower and upper polariton branches with an anti-crossing (Rabi splitting) are absent, the strong-coupling interpretation fails. A complementary check is to block microcavity formation, for example by using a dense flat film instead of the porous nanowire pellet: if the 643 nm laser-like line still appears, the cavity-based EPC mechanism is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that electrical current flowing through nanostructured polyaniline generates excitons that couple to photons to form exciton-polaritons, and that above a threshold these polaritons accumulate into an exciton-polariton condensate. The signature of condensation is a single narrow emission line at 643 nm (1.93 eV) that dominates and quenches all other spectral lines, appears in all polyaniline salts tested (HCl, H2SO4, PTSA, and emeraldine base), is directional and partially collimated, responds to magnetic fields and external light, and accompanies an increase in electrical conductivity. The authors infer an electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency of 80-90% from the observation that the sample temperature near 200 °C does not rise when the electrical power is raised from about 8 W to 75 W, and they predict about 600 lm/W luminous efficacy from the spectrum. The same 643 nm line is assigned to the polariton resonance at the material's roughly 650 nm absorption maximum, and broad emission components are attributed to phonon-polariton Raman processes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that polyaniline, which normally absorbs nearly all visible light, can under electrical excitation form optical microcavities whose light-matter coupling is strong enough to create genuine exciton-polaritons; the paper offers no direct measurement of that coupling, such as a Rabi splitting or polariton dispersion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

An electrically pumped polariton laser could be made from a solution-processed, strongly absorbing conducting polymer rather than from a carefully grown microcavity heterostructure.
The same 643 nm line appearing across HCl-, H2SO4-, PTSA-doped and emeraldine-base polyaniline implies the emitting state is set by the common polyaniline backbone, not by the specific dopant.
The claimed 80-90% conversion efficiency, if it holds, would mean most of the input electrical power leaves as light rather than heat, with a predicted luminous efficacy near 600 lm/W.
Sharp sub-1 V switching of the emission on and off suggests a voltage-controlled electro-optical bistability usable in optoelectronic devices.
The about 1 MHz voltage oscillations and the current-dependent conductivity jumps tie polariton formation and annihilation to measurable electrical dynamics, offering an electrical readout of the condensate state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A decisive test the paper does not report would be time-resolved or interferometric measurement of the 643 nm line: genuine polariton lasing should show a threshold in input power with line narrowing and a rise in temporal coherence, whereas random lasing in the same disordered medium can mimic line narrowing without condensation.
If the mechanism is really cavity-mediated, the emission wavelength should tune with the local dielectric environment, for example by changing the surrounding glass tube or the porosity of the pellet; such tuning would be a practical way to verify the microcavity role.
The predicted roughly 600 lm/W efficacy assumes the luminous efficiency of the 643 nm line; because 643 nm is near the peak of photopic sensitivity, even a moderate fraction of the claimed 80-90% wall-plug efficiency would give an unusually high luminous efficacy, which could be checked with an integrating-sphere measurement.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know about this paper is that it contains genuinely odd observations that might interest someone, but the central claim—electrically pumped exciton-polariton condensation in polyaniline—is not backed by the data. The paper reports a narrow 643 nm emission line, sharp threshold behavior, 1 MHz voltage oscillations, and magnetic-field sensitivity across several polyaniline samples. Those observations are new and, if reproducible, worth a look. The materials characterization (FTIR, EPR, elemental analysis, SEM) is standard and fine.

What the paper does not do is show any signature of strong coupling. There is no Rabi splitting, no angle-resolved dispersion, no lower/upper polariton branches, no coherence measurement, no absolute power calibration. The narrowing and threshold are also what you would see from random lasing or amplified spontaneous emission in a disordered gain medium. The authors invoke a "stimulated transparency" mechanism to make microcavities, but that is asserted rather than characterized—no cavity Q factor, no mode structure, no finesse.

The efficiency argument is a separate overreach. Concluding that 80–90% of the electrical power becomes light because the sample temperature at 75 W is similar to that at 8 W ignores heat loss through electrodes and the glass tube, plus any nonradiative recombination. Temperature at one point is not an energy balance.

There is also a circular flavor to the threshold current calculation: they assume an exciton lifetime (~100 ps) and Bohr radius (~10 nm), compute a current of 5–10 A, and then say it matches the observed 5–10 A. That is a consistency check with adjustable inputs, not a prediction. The paper's own wording—"possible EPC"—concedes the underdetermination.

The citation pattern leans heavily on the authors' prior work, including a 1978 claim of room-temperature superconductivity in polyaniline. I'm not saying the prior claims invalidate this paper, but the current manuscript does not independently establish strong coupling.

Who is this for? A specialist in organic optoelectronics might find the switching behavior and the narrow-line emission curious enough to want to replicate. A polariton physicist will see no reason to take the EPC claim seriously in this form.

Recommendation: This deserves a serious referee, but only with a clear instruction that the central claim must be either supported by direct strong-coupling measurements or removed. As written, it should be rejected—but the raw observations merit the chance for the authors to provide the missing evidence.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports electroluminescence from nanostructured polyaniline (PANI-EB, PANI-HCl, PANI-H2SO4, PANI-PTSA, and a composite PANI-NC) driven by direct electric current, with a narrow emission line at 643 nm, sharp ON-OFF switching, directional emission, and sensitivity to magnetic field and external light. The authors interpret these observations as evidence for exciton-polariton condensation (EPC) and an electrically pumped exciton-polariton polymer laser, and they estimate an electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency of 80-90% with a predicted luminous efficacy of about 600 lm/W. The paper contains no measurement of strong exciton-photon coupling, no angle-resolved dispersion, and no absolute optical power measurement; the central EPC claim rests on indirect signatures and an ad hoc 'stimulated transparency' mechanism.

Significance. If the claims were established, an electrically pumped organic exciton-polariton condensate operating at room temperature would be a genuinely important advance, merging the physics of polariton condensation with conducting-polymer materials and potentially enabling a new class of electrically driven coherent light sources. The synthesis of the materials is described reproducibly, and the raw observations of threshold-like nonlinearity and line narrowing at 643 nm are interesting in their own right. However, the significance is entirely contingent on the EPC interpretation, and that interpretation is not supported by the evidence presented; the generic lasing or random-lasing signatures could arise from other gain mechanisms, and the efficiency and threshold arguments are not independently validated.

major comments (4)

[Polariton lasing (Figs. 3–5) and Conclusions] The central claim that the 643 nm emission arises from exciton-polariton condensation requires direct evidence of strong exciton-photon coupling, such as a measured Rabi splitting (anticrossing) or an angle-resolved dispersion showing lower and upper polariton branches. The manuscript contains no such measurement. The observed spectral narrowing, threshold behavior, and directionality are generic signatures of gain-narrowed emission or random lasing and do not discriminate a photon laser from a polariton condensate. This is the load-bearing gap for the paper's title, abstract, and conclusions.
[Stimulated transparency and randomly distributed optical microcavities] The paper proposes that current-induced 'stimulated transparency' dynamically forms randomly distributed optical microcavities in which strong coupling occurs, but it provides no characterization of any cavity: no quality factor, finesse, mode spacing, or evidence that the cavities can support a photon mode long enough for strong coupling. Without such characterization, the mechanism is asserted rather than demonstrated, and, given that polyaniline is strongly absorbing in the visible range, the assumption of high-finesse cavities is not self-evident.
[Generation the excitons (Sec. 2, first paragraph)] The threshold current calculation is a post hoc consistency check, not a prediction. The estimate assumes an exciton lifetime of ~100 ps and an exciton Bohr radius of ~10 nm, then computes that filling a 3 mm tablet requires ~10^20 photons per second, corresponding to 5–10 A, and notes agreement with the observed threshold. Since neither parameter is independently measured for this material, and since two free parameters are tuned to match the observed current, the agreement does not provide validating evidence for the exciton-polariton model.
[Results and discussion (Fig. 4c)] The 80–90% electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency is not justified. The argument compares the sample temperature below threshold (4–8 W) with the temperature during emission (75 W) and concludes that the excess power must be radiated because the temperature is similar. However, a single-point temperature measurement does not close the power budget when heat is conducted away through the metal electrodes and glass tube. No absolute optical power is measured, and the luminous efficacy prediction of ~600 lm/W depends on this unsupported efficiency and on the unmeasured angular and spectral distribution of the emission.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 5 caption] The caption states 'single nearly monochromatic line at 634 nm' while the text and figures refer to 643 nm; this wavelength inconsistency must be corrected.
[Fig. 4 and its panels] The label 'Fig. 4' is used for the main image, panel (b), (c), (e), and (f) without a consistent subfigure structure; please renumber or use unified panel labels.
[References] Reference 11 is incomplete (no volume, page range, or article number for 'Nature Materials (2017)'), and reference 2 uses 'et al.' without a full author list; both should be completed.
[Why polaritons and exciton-polariton condensate EPC are involved] There is a typo, 'Additonally', and informal language such as 'don't' that should be corrected for a journal submission.
[Generation the excitons] The term 'prediction' is misleading given that the calculation uses assumed, not measured, exciton parameters; the text should explicitly call this a consistency estimate.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The threshold-current 'prediction' is a post-hoc consistency check with assumed exciton parameters, and the microcavity-formation mechanism is imported from the authors' prior work; the EPC interpretation itself remains underdetermined rather than independently derived.

fitted input called prediction [Results and discussion, 'Generation the excitons' section, threshold-current estimate]
"Excitons start to be effective above a specific current , e.g. 7 A for PANI-H2SO4 (Fig. 1), which well correlates with the prediction. Assuming the life time of excitons of ~100 ps, and the Bohr radius of exciton of ~10 nm, to fill a 3 mm diameter tablet with excitons, it is necessary to generate ~1020 photons per second, and this corresponds to the current of 5-10 A, as we found in our experiments (Fig. 1)."

The 'prediction' is not an independent derivation: the exciton lifetime (~100 ps) and Bohr radius (~10 nm) are assumed without measurement or external citation in this paper, and they are chosen so that the derived current falls into the observed 5-10 A range. The agreement is therefore a post-hoc consistency check in which the observed threshold current is effectively an input, not a prediction. This is a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern.
self citation load bearing [Results and discussion, 'Stimulated transparency and randomly distributed optical microcavities' section]
"Excitons and photons generated inside a non-transparent material, are able to transform it locally into a transparent matter (a dynamic stimulated transparency owing to attenuated absorption) forming optical microcavities, in which finally polaritons are created 2, 28-30. ... This process, based on properties of polyaniline nanostructures 15,16, has been discussed in previous paper 2."

The existence of randomly distributed optical microcavities in an opaque, disordered polymer is the load-bearing premise for strong coupling and EPC, yet the only specific support offered for this 'stimulated transparency' mechanism is the authors' own previous paper (ref 2). No cavity finesse, quality factor, or mode structure is measured in the present work. The mechanism is thus imported from a self-citation rather than independently established, making this a self-citation-load-bearing step.

1 more flagged steps

self citation load bearing [Results and discussion, paragraph near Fig. 4e on conductance oscillations and possible superconductivity]
"Sudden changes of the resistance of polyaniline samples were also reported in previous papers, when the electrical conductivity was measured 17-21. We found a correlation between changes in the electrical conductivity (including sharp pulses) and the IR absorption of PANI samples17. This demonstrates the influence of phonons onto the electrical conductivity and the results have been described as a possible superconductivity at room temperature (Tc = 22.5 oC) 17. This can be considered as the result of polariton condensation (EPC)."

The paper uses the same authors' 1978 room-temperature superconductivity claim (ref 17) as supporting evidence for the present EPC interpretation. This is a self-citation chain: a controversial prior assertion by the same author is reinterpreted as confirming EPC, rather than being tested independently. While not the sole basis for the EPC claim, it is invoked as corroboration and is load-bearing in the argument that conductivity anomalies are polariton-related.

full rationale

The paper's central EPC claim is not, by itself, a mathematical reduction: identifying the 643 nm line, directionality, magnetic-field sensitivity, and threshold switching with polariton condensation is an interpretive leap that is underdetermined rather than definitionally circular. However, two load-bearing links in the derivation chain are circular. First, the 'prediction' of the 5-10 A threshold current is obtained by assuming an exciton lifetime and Bohr radius that are not independently fixed, so the agreement with the observed threshold is a post-hoc consistency check; the observed current is effectively an input. Second, the microcavities required for strong coupling are asserted to form via 'stimulated transparency' in an opaque polymer, and the only cited support for this mechanism is the authors' previous paper (ref 2); no cavity finesse or mode structure is measured. The paper also leans on the same authors' older room-temperature superconductivity claim (ref 17) as supporting evidence for EPC. These factors make the derivation partially circular, though the EPC interpretation retains independent observational content (e.g., line narrowing, magnetic-field response), so the score is 6 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on assumed exciton parameters and on speculative mechanisms (strong coupling and stimulated transparency) that are not independently evidenced. The efficiency estimate further relies on an unverified thermal balance assumption.

free parameters (2)

exciton lifetime = ~100 ps
Assumed for the calculation that ~10^20 photons per second are needed to fill a 3 mm tablet; no measurement or citation is given, and the value is tuned to match the observed 5-10 A threshold current.
exciton Bohr radius = ~10 nm
Assumed in the same threshold estimate; the value is typical for organic excitons but is not measured for this material, and the resulting 'prediction' is a post hoc consistency check.

assumptions (3)

ad hoc to paper Strong exciton-photon coupling in polyaniline
The paper assumes polyaniline can enter the strong-coupling regime with microcavities, but provides no Rabi splitting or cavity finesse measurement.
ad hoc to paper Stimulated transparency forms random microcavities
Proposed to explain how a strongly absorbing polymer becomes locally transparent, but no direct evidence of cavity modes is given.
domain assumption Steady-state thermal balance for efficiency estimate
The 80-90% efficiency claim assumes all electrical power not radiated is dissipated as heat through the same pathways with the same sample temperature; the temperature measurement method is not described.

invented entities (1)

Randomly distributed optical microcavities from stimulated transparency
purpose: To confine photons and enable exciton-polariton formation in otherwise absorbing polyaniline.
The cavities are inferred from the observation of directional emission; no optical measurement of cavity modes, Q-factor, or confinement is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polariton-mediated light emission induced by electric current flow in nanostructured polyaniline." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P66SHBDD

@misc{pith2026250524738,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polariton-mediated light emission induced by electric current flow in nanostructured polyaniline},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P66SHBDD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24738}
}

read the original abstract

We present here a new mechanism of light emission induced by the electric current in polyaniline micro- and nanostructures. This process involves the formation of excitons, exciton-polaritons and finally an exciton-polariton condensate, leading to laser-like emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24738 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** I-V characteristics for PANI-H2SO4 in a whole experimental range 2 ; gray area corresponds to formation the neutral excitons lowering the electrical current. In single-wall carbon nanotubes, excitons have both Wannier-Mott and Frenkel character. This is due to the nature of the Coulomb interaction between electrons and holes in reduced-dimension. The wave function extends over a few to several nanometers along the t… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Directional light emission from PANI-H2SO4 and PANI-HCl, registered in a dark room (a). Intensity of emission in a function of electric current pumped 2 (b). This is much more efficient mechanism of converting the electrical energy into the light than just a spontaneous recombination of charge carriers or annihilation of excitons. Formation of excitonpolaritons and EPC in PANI samples at ambient temperature is effi… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Oscillations (~ 1 MHz) of the voltage at the sample during emission (e) can be assigned to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Generating a single nearly monochromatic line at 634 nm in two different PANI samples: PANI-H2SO4 at 5 V, 20 A (c) and PANI-NC 2 at 14.5 V, ~5 A (d); a simplified scheme of adequate energy levels; EPC energy level corresponding to directional emission at 643 nm is show…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Correlation of the I-V characteristics, the related emission intensity2 and 1 MHz oscillations, induced in PANI-H2SO4 (a). Evolution of emission of PANI-HCl in time (~5 s, up-down, thickness about 1 mm) demonstrates dynamic multiple condensation owing to motility of po…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

J. J. Langer, B. Miładowski, S. Golczak, K. Langer, P. Stefaniak, A. Adamczak, M. Andrzejewska, L. Sójka, M. Kalisz, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3859

work page 2010
[2]

Kalisz, et al

M. Kalisz, et al. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 6634

work page 2016
[3]

I. D. W. Samuel & G. A. Turnbull, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1272

work page 2007
[4]

I. D. W. Samuel, Nature, 2004, 429, 709

work page 2004
[5]

& Forget, S

Chénais, S. & Forget, S. Recent advances in solid-state organic lasers. Polymer Int. 61(3), 390–406 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

Namdas, E. B. et al. Low thresholds in polymer lasers on conductive substrates by distributed feedback nanoimprinting: progress toward electrically pumped plastic lasers. Adv. Mater. 21, 799–802 (2009)

work page 2009
[7]

& Zhang, D

Wang, J. & Zhang, D. One-Dimensional Nanostructured Polyaniline: Syntheses, Morphology Controlling, Formation Mechanisms, New Features, and Applications. Adv. Polym. Technol. 32(S1), E323–E368 (2013)

work page 2013
[8]

Piętka, B. et al. Magnetic field tuning of exciton-polaritons in a semiconductor microcavity. Phys. Rev. B 91, 075309 (2015)

work page 2015

Show all 34 references

[9]

Bosonic lasers: The state of the art (Review Article), Low Temperature Physics 42(5), 323-329 (2016)

Kavokin, A., et al. Bosonic lasers: The state of the art (Review Article), Low Temperature Physics 42(5), 323-329 (2016)

2016
[10]

An electrically pumped polariton laser

Schneider, C., et al. An electrically pumped polariton laser. Nature 497, 348-352 (2013

2013
[11]

Electrical pumping and tuning of exciton-polaritons in carbon nanotube microcavities

Graf, A., et al. Electrical pumping and tuning of exciton-polaritons in carbon nanotube microcavities. Nature Materials (2017) on-line, doi:10.1038/nmat4940

2017 doi
[12]

Electronics of Conjugated Polymers (I): Polyaniline, Int

Molapo, K.M., et al. Electronics of Conjugated Polymers (I): Polyaniline, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7, 11859 – 11875 (2012)

2012
[13]

& MacDiarmid, A

Chiang, J.-C. & MacDiarmid, A. G. Polyaniline protonic acid doping of the emeraldine form to the metallic regime. Synth. Metals 13, 193-205 (1986)

1986
[14]

MacDiarmid, A. G. Synthetic metals: a novel role for organic polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 2581 - 2590 (2001)

2001
[15]

Langer, J.J. et al. Polyaniline micro- and nanofibrils. Synth. Met. 121, 1319-1320 (2001)

2001
[16]

& Czajkowski, I

Langer, J.J. & Czajkowski, I. Polyaniline microrods. Adv. Mat. Opt. Electr. 7, 149-156 (1997)

1997
[17]

Langer, J. J. Unusual properties of the aniline black: does the superconductivity exist at room temperature? Solid State Commun. 26, 839-844, (1978)

1978
[18]

Langer, J. J. Unusual diamagnetism in aniline black (polyaniline). J. Mol. Electron. 5, 103-105 (1989)

1989
[19]

Langer, J. J. A process leading to the domain structure of aniline black (polyaniline). Synth. Met. 36, 35- 40 (1990)

1990
[20]

Epstein, A. J. et al. Insulator-to-metal transition in polyaniline: effect of protonation in emealdine. Synth. Met. 21, 63–70 (1987). 16

1987
[21]

/24 He, H. X. et al. Discrete conductance switching in conducting polymer wires. Phys. Rev. B 68, 045302-1-045302-6 (2003)

2003
[22]

Ma X., et al., Preparation of a Nanowire-Structured Polyaniline Composite and Gas Sensitivity Studies. Chem. Eur. J. 12, 3254-3260 (2006)

2006
[23]

M., et al

Molapo, K. M., et al. Electronics of conjugated polymers (I): polyaniline. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7, 11859–11875 (2012)

2012
[24]

Z., et al

Kurmaev, E. Z., et al. Spectroscopic observation of polaron-lattice band structure in the conducting polymer polyaniline. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 3907-3912 (2001)

2001
[25]

N-substituted polyanilines

Langer, J.J. N-substituted polyanilines. II. Photoacoustic and FTIR spectra of poly(N-methylaniline) and related copolymers. Synthetic Metals 35, 301-305 (1990)

1990
[26]

Do Nascimento, G. M. Spectroscopy of polyaniline nanofibers, in Nanofibers, ed. A. Kumar ,InTech, Rijeka, 349-366 (2010)

2010
[27]

Avouris, Ph. et al. Bright infrared emission form electrically induced excitons in carbon nanotubes. Science 310, 1171 -1174 (2005)

2005
[28]

Strong exciton-photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity

Lidzey DG, et al. Strong exciton-photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity. Nature 1998;395:53–55

1998
[29]

Butov, L. V. & Kavokin, A. V. The behaviour of exciton–polaritons. Nature Photonics 6, 2 (2012)

2012
[30]

Mills, D. L. & Burstein, E. Polaritons: the electromagnetic modes of media. Rep. Prog. Phys. 37, 817-926 (1974)

1974
[31]

Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap

Balili, R., et al. Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap. Science 316, 1007-1010 (2007)

2007
[32]

Room temperature polariton lasing in semiconductor microcavities

Christopoulos, S., et al. Room temperature polariton lasing in semiconductor microcavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 126405-126408 (2007)

2007
[33]

Room temperature polariton lasing vs

Lu, T.-C. Room temperature polariton lasing vs. photon lasing in a ZnO-based hybrid microcavity. Optics Express 20, 5530–5537 (2012)

2012
[34]

Room temperature operation of electro-optical bistability in the edge-emitting tunneling- collector transistor laser

Feng, M., et al. Room temperature operation of electro-optical bistability in the edge-emitting tunneling- collector transistor laser. Journal of Applied Physics 122, 103102 (2017); doi: 10.1063/1.4989521

2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

J. J. Langer, B. Miładowski, S. Golczak, K. Langer, P. Stefaniak, A. Adamczak, M. Andrzejewska, L. Sójka, M. Kalisz, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3859

work page 2010

[2] [2]

Kalisz, et al

M. Kalisz, et al. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 6634

work page 2016

[3] [3]

I. D. W. Samuel & G. A. Turnbull, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1272

work page 2007

[4] [4]

I. D. W. Samuel, Nature, 2004, 429, 709

work page 2004

[5] [5]

& Forget, S

Chénais, S. & Forget, S. Recent advances in solid-state organic lasers. Polymer Int. 61(3), 390–406 (2012)

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Namdas, E. B. et al. Low thresholds in polymer lasers on conductive substrates by distributed feedback nanoimprinting: progress toward electrically pumped plastic lasers. Adv. Mater. 21, 799–802 (2009)

work page 2009

[7] [7]

& Zhang, D

Wang, J. & Zhang, D. One-Dimensional Nanostructured Polyaniline: Syntheses, Morphology Controlling, Formation Mechanisms, New Features, and Applications. Adv. Polym. Technol. 32(S1), E323–E368 (2013)

work page 2013

[8] [8]

Piętka, B. et al. Magnetic field tuning of exciton-polaritons in a semiconductor microcavity. Phys. Rev. B 91, 075309 (2015)

work page 2015