Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 80 references

Role of thermal fluctuations in nucleation of three-flavor quark matter

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Flavor jitter lowers the quark-matter nucleation barrier

desk verdict A genuine three-flavor extension of their nucleation formalism with a new CFL threshold, transparently derived, but the quantitative barrier heights rest on treating ~45-baryon droplets as bulk phases and switching to CFL right at the critical radius. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00139 v2 pith:DEOLQUAT submitted 2025-05-30 nucl-th astro-ph.HE

Mirco Guerrini , Giuseppe Pagliara , Andrea Lavagno , Alessandro Drago This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thastro-ph.HE
keywords nucleationquarkmattercompactstarsthermalfluctuationscolorsuperconductivitystrangeactivationenergyequationofstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that, when a first droplet of three-flavor quark matter nucleates inside dense hadronic matter, the local composition of matter is not frozen but fluctuates thermally, and those fluctuations make the droplet easier to form. It extends a previous two-flavor formalism to three flavors and derives an activation energy for nucleation that is lower than the one obtained from the usual frozen-composition assumption. The paper also proposes that color superconductivity can affect the critical droplet only when the droplet is larger than the diquark coherence length, setting the critical radius equal to that length in the low-density regime. If correct, the first droplet of strange quark matter appears at lower density and temperature than previously estimated, which would shift the expected onset of deconfinement in compact stars, supernovae, and neutron-star mergers.

What carries the argument

The key object is the activation energy W, the height of the free-energy barrier between the metastable hadronic phase and the quark phase, computed as a sum of a bulk term and a surface term σ·$4πR^{2}$. The saddle-point condition fixes the critical radius R_* = 2σ/(P_Q - P_H), and the composition of the droplet is set by minimizing W with respect to the fluctuated strangeness and charge fractions, giving the strong-interaction chemical equilibrium conditions in Eqs. (68)-(72). Color superconductivity enters as a step function: the pressure is that of unpaired quark matter for R ≤ R_Δ and of CFL quark matter for R > R_Δ, with R_Δ = 1/Δ(T) taken as the diquark coherence length. This machine turns the vague idea of 'composition fluctuation' into a definite formula for the nucleation rate, and it turns the size threshold for pairing into a concrete modification of the critical radius.

What would settle it

A lattice or functional-QCD computation of the free energy of a 45-70 baryon droplet of deconfined quark matter with a sharp hadron-quark interface: if that free energy cannot be represented as a bulk term plus a constant surface tension, then the quantitative barrier heights and the R_* = R_Δ threshold derived here are not reliable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the activation energy for nucleating a three-flavor quark matter droplet is W = $16πσ^{3}$ / (3 [P_Q(n_Q*, Y_Q*, T) - P_H(n_H, Y_H, T)]^2), where the droplet's composition is no longer fixed to the hadronic composition but is instead determined by the chemical equilibrium conditions μ_Q^B = μ_H^B, μ_Q^C + μ_Q^e = μ_H^C + μ_H^e, μ_Q^S = μ_H^S, and charge neutrality. For an initial hadronic phase in β equilibrium, this makes the first quark droplet also β-equilibrated even though weak interactions play no role during nucleation. The paper further claims that color-flavor-locked (CFL) pairing can participate only once the droplet radius exceeds the diquark coherence length R_Δ = 1/Δ(T); when the unpaired critical radius exceeds that length, the true critical radius is R_* = R_Δ, and the barrier height is reduced accordingly. The overall effect is that composition fluctuations and, in the relevant regime, color superconductivity lower the nucleation barrier relative to the frozen-composition estimate.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats a droplet of only a few dozen baryons as a bulk thermodynamic phase with a sharp surface tension and a step-function switch to CFL pairing beyond a fixed radius.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nucleation of strange quark matter in compact stars occurs at lower baryon density and temperature than the frozen-composition estimate predicted, because a locally fluctuated composition can substantially reduce the barrier.
  • The first droplet of quark matter is in β equilibrium whenever the surrounding hadronic phase is in β equilibrium, even though weak interactions are too slow to change the composition during nucleation.
  • Color-flavor-locked pairing matters only when the unpaired critical radius exceeds the diquark coherence length; otherwise the critical radius is set by R_Δ = 1/Δ(T), independent of the hadronic density.
  • The activation energy scales as σ^3 when the critical radius is determined by mechanical equilibrium, but only linearly with σ when the critical radius is pinned at R_Δ, so the surface tension matters differently in the two regimes.
  • A nucleation time of about one second corresponds to W/T ≈ 170, meaning that even a very low local nucleation rate is sufficient to trigger deconfinement inside a compact star core of about 100 m radius.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, this framework suggests that core-collapse supernova and binary neutron-star merger simulations that assume frozen flavor composition may systematically overestimate the density and temperature needed for quark deconfinement, so the observable signature (e.g., a delayed collapse or an ejected-strangeness signal) could appear earlier than those simulations predict.
  • The same composition-fluctuation logic could be tested in heavy-ion collision models that enforce global strangeness conservation: allowing local fluctuations of strangeness should lower the effective onset density for quark droplet formation there as well.
  • Because the CFL gap is temperature-dependent, the nucleation window at high temperature would be governed by the unpaired equation of state alone, so measurements of the nucleation threshold in that regime could constrain the unpaired bag constant more directly than the CFL parameters.
  • The framework identifies a sharp crossover at R_* = R_Δ; if a microscopic calculation of the droplet free energy shows a smooth onset of pairing rather than a step function, the quantitative barrier heights derived here would change, but the qualitative lowering due to composition fluctuations would persist.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a thermodynamic framework for the nucleation of three-flavor quark matter in compact-star conditions, extending the authors' previous two-flavor formalism. The key ingredients are (i) thermal fluctuations of the local hadronic composition, so that the first quark droplet can be born in a fluctuated subsystem H* whose composition differs from the bulk average, and (ii) a radius-dependent equation of state in which color-flavor-locked (CFL) pairing is allowed only for droplets larger than the diquark coherence length R_Delta = 1/Delta(T). The main formal result is the activation energy W = 16 pi sigma^3 / [3 (P_Q - P_H)^2] (Eq. 67), with the droplet composition fixed by the chemical-equilibrium conditions in Eqs. (68)-(72), and the corresponding critical radius in the CFL case given by Eq. (80). The authors show that minimizing the total work over the fluctuated composition yields exactly the conditions of global chemical equilibrium for the strong-interaction conserved charges, and they present illustrative numerical results for representative values of sigma, the bag constants, and the diquark gap. They conclude that composition fluctuations lower the nucleation barrier relative to the frozen-composition approach and that CFL pairing further reduces the barrier at low baryon density and temperature.

Significance. If quantitatively reliable, the framework would change the estimated threshold for quark deconfinement in protoneutron stars and merger remnants, moving it to lower densities and temperatures than the standard frozen-composition calculation. The paper is valuable for making explicit the variational structure of multicomponent nucleation: the equivalence between minimizing the activation energy over the droplet composition and imposing global chemical equilibrium is a useful and non-obvious result, and the authors are commendably explicit about the main limitations (constant surface tension, local charge neutrality, two-phase approximation, missing order-parameter potential). The derivation is presented in enough detail that it can be checked and extended. However, the quantitative claims are not yet on a firm footing because the calculation applies bulk thermodynamics plus a constant surface term to droplets of only about 45-70 baryons, and the CFL step-function onset is assumed rather than derived; both points are central to the reported barrier reduction. The parameter dependence is also strong, and the authors defer a systematic scan to future work.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (79)] The step-function onset of CFL pairing at R_Delta = 1/Delta(T) is load-bearing for the central quantitative claim that color superconductivity lowers the nucleation barrier at low density and temperature. In the illustrative case nH_B = 3 n0, T = 20 MeV, the critical droplet has N*_B ~ 45 and R* ~ 2.6 fm, while R_Delta ~ 2.5 fm, so the saddle point in Eq. (80) sits essentially at the assumed pairing threshold. In such a few-baryon system, finite-size suppression of BCS pairing and discrete level spacings are expected to be non-negligible, and the true minimum radius for pairing may be appreciably larger than 1/Delta; if so, the R* = R_Delta saddle point would not exist at low nH_B and the claimed barrier reduction would not occur. The paper cites Ref. [54] on color superconductivity in finite systems but does not use its estimates. Please provide a quantitative estimate of finite-size pairing corrections, or explicitly reframe the R* = R_Delta result as an illustrative upper bound rather than a quantitative prediction.
  2. [Secs. 2.4-2.5 and Sec. 4] The calculation treats a critical droplet of about 45-70 baryons as a bulk thermodynamic phase with a sharp interface and a constant surface tension. At the reference parameters (sigma = 30 MeV fm^-2, nH_B = 3 n0, T = 20 MeV), the surface energy 4 pi sigma R*^2 ~ 2.5 GeV corresponds to roughly 57 MeV per baryon, the same order as the bulk driving terms, so there is no small parameter justifying the neglect of curvature and higher-order finite-size terms. The paper mentions that curvature can be absorbed into an enlarged surface tension, but no estimate of the resulting systematic error is given. Since Eq. (67) is presented as a quantitative activation energy, the authors should either estimate the curvature/finite-size corrections or consistently present the numerical results as order-of-magnitude illustrations rather than quantitative predictions.
  3. [Sec. 4 and Sec. 5] The numerical threshold statements, such as the claim that tau = 1 s is reached at T ~ 20 MeV in the unp+CFL approach versus T ~ 80 MeV in the frozen-composition approach, are obtained for a single hand-picked parameter set (sigma = 30 MeV fm^-2, B_unp^1/4 = 175 MeV, B_CFL^1/4 = 135 MeV, Delta0 = 80 MeV, alpha_s = pi/20). The central result is expected to depend sensitively on sigma and Delta0, and the paper explicitly defers a systematic parameter scan. This is acceptable for a framework paper, but the abstract and conclusions should make clear that the quantitative lowering of the nucleation threshold is provisional and parameter-dependent, not a robust prediction of the framework.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A.5] In the parameter list, the second value 'B^{1/4}_{unp} = 135 MeV' should read 'B^{1/4}_{CFL} = 135 MeV'; as written, the same symbol is used twice with different values.
  2. [Sec. 2.11] The finding that minimizing W over the fluctuated composition yields exactly the global chemical-equilibrium conditions (Eqs. 60-62) is an important result, but the wording 'thermal fluctuations lower the barrier' could be misread as claiming that typical equilibrium fluctuations drive the effect. In fact, the optimal composition is not a typical fluctuation but a large deviation whose cost W1 is included; a sentence distinguishing 'path optimization' from 'typical thermal fluctuation' would improve clarity.
  3. [Sec. 4, Fig. 3] The captions of the left panels are dense, and the relationship between the red curve (unp+CFL) and the dashed/dotted red curves (W2 and W1) is hard to follow at a glance. Adding a short pointer in the caption clarifying that the solid red curve is W = W1 + W2 would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the composition optimization is a genuine saddle-point result, and the CFL threshold is an explicit ansatz. Only minor non-load-bearing self-citations to [12] appear.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The activation energy W in Eq. (67) is the standard classical-nucleation expression, and the droplet composition is obtained by minimizing the total work W over the fluctuated composition {Y*}. Section 2.11 (Eqs. (58)-(62)) shows that this minimization yields the chemical-equilibrium conditions mu_Q_C + mu_Q_e = mu_H_C + mu_H_e and mu_Q_S = mu_H_S, and the paper explicitly states that the approach is then analytically identical to assuming global conservation of strongly conserved charges. This is an acknowledged equivalence, not a circular import: the equilibrium composition is an output of the variational calculation, not an input. The lowering of the barrier relative to the frozen-composition case is the standard consequence of allowing a previously constrained composition variable to relax to its saddle-point value; the associated fluctuation cost W1 is included and cancels in the total W, so no statistical forcing is hidden. The CFL ingredient is introduced as an explicit step-function ansatz in Eq. (79), with R_Delta = 1/Delta(T) taken from the cited coherence-length estimate; Eq. (80) then follows by maximizing the piecewise W(R). The result that CFL lowers the barrier at low density is a direct consequence of the assumed higher pressure of the CFL phase, not a fitted parameter presented as a prediction. Self-citations to [12] concern the previous two-flavor formalism and the normalization of the fluctuation distribution; the present paper re-derives the core equations, so these citations are not load-bearing. The acknowledged limitations (constant surface tension, missing order-parameter potential, and application of bulk thermodynamics to approximately 45-baryon droplets) are correctness and model risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on six tuned EOS parameters (surface tension, two bag constants, gap, alpha_s, m_s) and a set of domain assumptions about local conservation, instantaneous thermal and mechanical equilibration of the fluctuation, small-droplet bath behavior, and the two-phase sharp-interface approximation. The paper openly acknowledges these dependencies and defers a systematic parameter study to future work.

free parameters (6)
  • surface tension sigma = 30 MeV fm^-2
    Constant surface tension treated as an independent parameter in Sections 2.4 and 4; known to be highly uncertain and model-dependent in the literature.
  • unpaired phase bag constant Bunp^1/4 = 175 MeV
    Chosen so unpaired SQM does not satisfy the Witten hypothesis; set in Appendix A.5.
  • CFL phase bag constant BCFL^1/4 = 135 MeV
    Chosen so CFL SQM satisfies the Witten hypothesis; set in Appendix A.5, similar to ref [19].
  • zero-temperature diquark gap Delta0 = 80 MeV
    Sets the coherence length R_Delta = 1/Delta(T); chosen in Appendix A.2.2 and A.5.
  • strong coupling alpha_s = pi/2 * 0.1
    Fixed in Appendix A.5 for the perturbative corrections in the alphaBag model.
  • strange quark mass m_s = 100 MeV
    Fixed in Appendix A.5; non-interacting massive quark Fermi gas for strange quarks.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Fluctuation probability P proportional to exp(-W/T) (Eq. 1) and Langer nucleation theory, Eqs. (2)-(5).
    Background statistical physics invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Local flavor conservation of C and S during droplet formation, Eqs. (28)-(29), and local electromagnetic charge neutrality, Eqs. (30)-(31).
    Assumed in Sections 2.6 and 2.7; the paper notes a full treatment should consider charge screening and global versus local conservation.
  • domain assumption The hadronic fluctuation H* reaches thermal and mechanical equilibrium with the surroundings instantaneously while the chemical composition remains frozen, Eqs. (32)-(33).
    Section 2.8; underlies the derivation of W1 and W2.
  • domain assumption Small droplet approximation: V_Q* ~ 100-1000 fm^3 is much smaller than V ~ 10^51 fm^3, so the surroundings act as a bath, Eqs. (20)-(22).
    Section 2.5; valid for compact star cores but not for small systems such as heavy-ion collisions.
  • domain assumption Two-phase approximation with a sharp interface, constant surface tension, and curvature energy absorbed into the surface term.
    Sections 2.4 and 5; the paper states the order-parameter potential is missing and surface tension is a free parameter.
  • ad hoc to paper Step-function onset of CFL pairing at droplet radius R > R_Delta = 1/Delta(T), Eq. (79).
    Introduced in Section 3 as a simplification; the paper notes a smooth transition would add no benefit and could be captured by adjusting free parameters.
  • domain assumption Bulk thermodynamic EOSs remain valid for droplets with N*_B ~ 45-70 baryons (R* ~ 2.6 fm).
    Used throughout Section 4; the paper does not test finite-size corrections beyond the surface term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Role of thermal fluctuations in nucleation of three-flavor quark matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DEOLQUAT

@misc{pith2026250600139,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Role of thermal fluctuations in nucleation of three-flavor quark matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DEOLQUAT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00139}
}
read the original abstract

We present a framework that aims to investigate the role of thermal fluctuations of the matter composition and color-superconductivity in the nucleation of three-flavor deconfined quark matter in the typical conditions of high-energy astrophysical systems related to compact stars. It is usually assumed that the flavor composition is locally fixed during the formation of the first seed of deconfined quark matter since weak interaction acts too slowly to re-equilibrate flavors. However, the matter composition fluctuates around its average equilibrium values at the typical temperatures of high-energy astrophysical processes. Here, we extend our previous two-flavor nucleation formalism to a three-flavor case. We develop a thermodynamic framework incorporating finite-size effects and thermal fluctuations of local composition to compute the nucleation probability as the product of droplet formation and composition fluctuation rates. Moreover, we discuss the role of color-superconductivity in nucleation, arguing that it can play a role only in systems larger than the typical coherence length of diquark pairs. We found that thermal fluctuations of the matter composition lead to lowering the potential barrier between the metastable hadronic phase and the stable quark phase. Moreover, the formation of diquark pairs reduces the critical radius and thus the potential barrier in the low baryon density and temperature regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00139 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (top) Pressure P as a function of the initial baryon density n H B at a fixed temperature T = 20 MeV (left) and T = 50 MeV (right). The different lines refer to the hadronic phase H, unpaired SQM with a fluctuated composition (Q∗ fluct. unp), unpaired SQM with a frozen composition (Q∗ froz. unp), and CFL SQM (Q∗ fluct. CFL). (bottom) Composition of the initial hadronic phase {Y H i } as a function of the initial bar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. displays the composition fluctuation probability (exp(−W1/T)). A complete discussion on the normalization and a comparison with a multivariate Gaussian can be found in [12]. In the left (right) panel, the composition fluctuation probability is shown as a function of Y ∗ C (Y ∗ S ) with a fixed Y ∗ S = Y Hβ S (Y ∗ C = Y Hβ C ). The maximum of the distributions corresponded to W1 = 0 MeV, namely the average equilibriu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Thermodynamical work W needed to generate an SQM droplet as a function of the droplet radius R (namely, the energy barrier separating the metastable hadronic phase and the stable SQM phase) for n H B = 3 n0 (top), n H B = 6 n0 (middle), and n H B = 9 n0 (bottom). In the left column, the red line refers to the framework in which SQM is in the CFL (unpaired) phase if the droplet is larger (smaller) than the coherence … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    Color superconductivity in finite systems.Phys

    Amore, P .; Birse, M.C.; McGovern, J.A.; Walet, N.R. Color superconductivity in finite systems.Phys. Rev. D 2002,65, 074005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.074005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.074005 2002

  2. [1]

    Nucleation of quark matter bubbles in neutron stars.Phys

    Olesen, M.L.; Madsen, J. Nucleation of quark matter bubbles in neutron stars.Phys. Rev. D1994,49, 2698–

    work page

  3. [2]

    Quark Matter Droplet Formation in Neutron Stars

    Heiselberg, H. Quark Matter Droplet Formation in Neutron Stars.arXiv1995, arXiv:hep-ph/9501374

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [3]

    Quark matter nucleation in neutron stars and astrophys- ical implications.Eur

    Bombaci, I.; Logoteta, D.; Vidaña, I.; Providência, C. Quark matter nucleation in neutron stars and astrophys- ical implications.Eur. Phys. J. A2016,52, 58. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16058-5

    doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16058-5

  5. [4]

    Nucleation of quark matter in protoneutron star matter.Phys

    Mintz, B.W.; Fraga, E.S.; Pagliara, G.; Schaffner-Bielich, J. Nucleation of quark matter in protoneutron star matter.Phys. Rev. D2010,81, 123012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123012

  6. [5]

    Quantum nucleation of two flavor quark matter in neutron stars.Prog

    Iida, K.; Sato, K. Quantum nucleation of two flavor quark matter in neutron stars.Prog. Theor. Phys.1997, 98, 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP .98.277

    doi:10.1143/ptp 1997

  7. [6]

    Effects of color superconductivity on the nucleation of quark matter in neutron stars.Astron

    Bombaci, I.; Lugones, G.; Vidana, I. Effects of color superconductivity on the nucleation of quark matter in neutron stars.Astron. Astrophys.2007,462, 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065259

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065259 2007

  8. [7]

    Quark deconfinement as a supernova explosion engine for massive blue supergiant stars.Nat

    Fischer, T.; Bastian, N.U.F.; Wu, M.R.; Baklanov, P .; Sorokina, E.; Blinnikov, S.; Typel, S.; Klähn, T.; Blaschke, D.B. Quark deconfinement as a supernova explosion engine for massive blue supergiant stars.Nat. Astron. 2018,2, 980–986. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0583-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0583-0 2018

Show all 80 references
  1. [8]

    Constraining the onset density of the hadron-quark phase transition with gravitational-wave observations

    Blacker, S.; Bastian, N.U.F.; Bauswein, A.; Blaschke, D.B.; Fischer, T.; Oertel, M.; Soultanis, T.; Typel, S. Constraining the onset density of the hadron-quark phase transition with gravitational-wave observations. Phys. Rev. D2020,102, 123023. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

    doi

  2. [9]

    Can very compact and very massive neutron stars both exist?Phys

    Drago, A.; Lavagno, A.; Pagliara, G. Can very compact and very massive neutron stars both exist?Phys. Rev. D2014,89, 043014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.043014

    doi

  3. [10]

    The scenario of two families of compact stars: 1

    Drago, A.; Lavagno, A.; Pagliara, G.; Pigato, D. The scenario of two families of compact stars: 1. Equations of state, mass-radius relations and binary systems.Eur. Phys. J. A2016,52, 40. https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/i2016-16040-3

  4. [11]

    The scenario of two families of compact stars: 2

    Drago, A.; Pagliara, G. The scenario of two families of compact stars: 2. Transition from hadronic to quark matter and explosive phenomena.Eur. Phys. J. A2016,52, 41. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16041-2

    doi

  5. [12]

    Thermal Fluctuations of Matter Composition and Quark Nucleation in Compact Stars.Astrophys

    Guerrini, M.; Pagliara, G.; Drago, A.; Lavagno, A. Thermal Fluctuations of Matter Composition and Quark Nucleation in Compact Stars.Astrophys. J.2024,974, 45. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad67cc

    2024 doi

  6. [13]

    The Minimal CFL nuclear interface.Phys

    Alford, M.G.; Rajagopal, K.; Reddy, S.; Wilczek, F. The Minimal CFL nuclear interface.Phys. Rev. D2001, 64, 074017. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.074017

    doi

  7. [14]

    Hybrid Stars that Masquerade as Neutron Stars.Astrophys

    Alford, M.; Braby, M.; Paris, M.; Reddy, S. Hybrid Stars that Masquerade as Neutron Stars.Astrophys. J. 2005,629, 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1086/430902

    2005 doi

  8. [15]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter.Rev

    Alford, M.G.; Schmitt, A.; Rajagopal, K.; Schäfer, T. Color superconductivity in dense quark matter.Rev. Mod. Phys.2008,80, 1455–1515. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455

    2008 doi

  9. [16]

    Hybrid star phenomenology from the properties of the special point.Phys

    Gärtlein, C.; Ivanytskyi, O.; Sagun, V .; Blaschke, D. Hybrid star phenomenology from the properties of the special point.Phys. Rev. D2023,108, 114028. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114028

    doi

  10. [17]

    Effect of color superconductivity on the mass of hybrid neutron stars in an effective model with perturbative QCD asymptotics.Phys

    Blaschke, D.; Shukla, U.; Ivanytskyi, O.; Liebing, S. Effect of color superconductivity on the mass of hybrid neutron stars in an effective model with perturbative QCD asymptotics.Phys. Rev. D2023,107, 063034. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063034

    doi

  11. [18]

    Early deconfinement of asymptotically conformal color-superconducting quark matter in neutron stars.EPJ Web Conf.2022,274, 07010

    Ivanytskyi, O.; Blaschke, D.; Fischer, T.; Bauswein, A. Early deconfinement of asymptotically conformal color-superconducting quark matter in neutron stars.EPJ Web Conf.2022,274, 07010. https://doi.org/10.1 051/epjconf/202227407010

    2022

  12. [19]

    Was GW190814 a Black Hole–Strange Quark Star System?Phys

    Bombaci, I.; Drago, A.; Logoteta, D.; Pagliara, G.; Vidaña, I. Was GW190814 a Black Hole–Strange Quark Star System?Phys. Rev. Lett.2021,126, 162702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.162702

    2021 doi

  13. [20]

    Using gravitational-wave observations and quasi-universal relations to constrain the maximum mass of neutron stars.Astrophys

    Rezzolla, L.; Most, E.R.; Weih, L.R. Using gravitational-wave observations and quasi-universal relations to constrain the maximum mass of neutron stars.Astrophys. J. Lett.2018,852, L25. https://doi.org/10.3847/20 41-8213/aaa401

    2018 doi

  14. [21]

    GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole 31 of 33 with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object.Astrophys

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agathos, M.; et al. GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole 31 of 33 with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object.Astrophys. J...

    2020 doi

  15. [22]

    GW170817 and GW190814: Tension on the maximum mass.Astrophys

    Nathanail, A.; Most, E.R.; Rezzolla, L. GW170817 and GW190814: Tension on the maximum mass.Astrophys. J. Lett.2021,908, L28. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abdfc6

    2021 doi

  16. [23]

    Evolution of bare quark stars in full general relativity: Single star case.Phys

    Zhou, E.; Kiuchi, K.; Shibata, M.; Tsokaros, A.; Uryu, K. Evolution of bare quark stars in full general relativity: Single star case.Phys. Rev. D2021,103, 123011. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123011

    doi

  17. [24]

    Landau, L.; Lifshitz, E.Statistical Physics, Volume 5; Editori Riuniti: Roma, Italy, 1978

    1978

  18. [25]

    Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states.Ann

    Langer, J.S. Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states.Ann. Phys.1969,54, 258–275. https: //doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(69)90153-5

    1969 doi

  19. [26]

    Hydrodynamic Model of the Condensation of a Vapor near Its Critical Point.Phys

    Langer, J.S.; Turski, L.A. Hydrodynamic Model of the Condensation of a Vapor near Its Critical Point.Phys. Rev. A1973,8, 3230–3243. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.3230

    doi

  20. [27]

    Nucleation of relativistic first-order phase transitions.Phys

    Csernai, L.P .; Kapusta, J.I. Nucleation of relativistic first-order phase transitions.Phys. Rev. D1992, 46, 1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.1379

    doi

  21. [28]

    Dynamical growth rate of a diffuse interface in first-order phase transitions

    Venugopalan, R.; Vischer, A.P . Dynamical growth rate of a diffuse interface in first-order phase transitions. Phys. Rev. E1994,49, 5849–5852. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.49.5849

    doi

  22. [29]

    Transport Properties of Excited Nuclear Matter and the Shock Wave Profile.Phys

    Danielewicz, P . Transport Properties of Excited Nuclear Matter and the Shock Wave Profile.Phys. Lett. B 1984,146, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)91010-4

    1984 doi

  23. [30]

    Quark matter nucleation in hot hadronic matter.Phys

    Bombaci, I.; Logoteta, D.; Panda, P .K.; Providencia, C.; Vidana, I. Quark matter nucleation in hot hadronic matter.Phys. Lett. B2009,680, 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.09.039

    2009 doi

  24. [31]

    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009401968

    Kapusta, J.I.; Gale, C.Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009401968

    2007 doi

  25. [32]

    From quark drops to quark stars: Some aspects of the role of quark matter in compact stars

    Lugones, G. From quark drops to quark stars: Some aspects of the role of quark matter in compact stars. Eur. Phys. J. A2016,52, 53. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16053-x

    doi

  26. [33]

    Nucleation rate of color superconducting droplets in protoneu- tron stars.J

    Carmo, T.A.S.d.; Lugones, G.; Grunfeld, A.G. Nucleation rate of color superconducting droplets in protoneu- tron stars.J. Phys. G2013,40, 035201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/40/3/035201

    doi

  27. [34]

    Effects of hyperons on the dynamical deconfinement transition in cold neutron star matter

    Iida, K.; Sato, K. Effects of hyperons on the dynamical deconfinement transition in cold neutron star matter. Phys. Rev. C1998,58, 2538–2559. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.2538

    doi

  28. [35]

    First order phase transitions with more than one conserved charge: Consequences for neutron stars.Phys

    Glendenning, N.K. First order phase transitions with more than one conserved charge: Consequences for neutron stars.Phys. Rev. D1992,46, 1274–1287. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.1274

    doi

  29. [36]

    The Deconfinement phase transition in asymmetric matter.Nucl

    Muller, H. The Deconfinement phase transition in asymmetric matter.Nucl. Phys. A1997,618, 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00018-3

    doi

  30. [37]

    Conditions for Phase Equilibrium in Supernovae, Proto- Neutron and Neutron Stars.Phys

    Hempel, M.; Pagliara, G.; Schaffner-Bielich, J. Conditions for Phase Equilibrium in Supernovae, Proto- Neutron and Neutron Stars.Phys. Rev. D2009,80, 125014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.125014

    doi

  31. [38]

    Framework for phase transitions between the Maxwell and Gibbs constructions at finite temperature.arXiv2025,[arXiv:nucl-th/2506.20418]

    Constantinou, C.; Guerrini, M.; Zhao, T.; Han, S.; Prakash, M. Framework for phase transitions between the Maxwell and Gibbs constructions at finite temperature.arXiv2025,[arXiv:nucl-th/2506.20418]

  32. [39]

    Separation of Strangeness from Antistrangeness in the Phase Transition from Quark to Hadron Matter: Possible Formation of Strange Quark Matter in Heavy Ion Collisions.Phys

    Greiner, C.; Koch, P .; Stoecker, H. Separation of Strangeness from Antistrangeness in the Phase Transition from Quark to Hadron Matter: Possible Formation of Strange Quark Matter in Heavy Ion Collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett.1987,58, 1825–1828. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1825

    1987 doi

  33. [40]

    Distillation and survival of strange quark matter droplets in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys

    Greiner, C.; Stoecker, H. Distillation and survival of strange quark matter droplets in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. D1991,44, 3517–3529. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3517

    doi

  34. [41]

    Strangeness thermodynamic instabilities in hot and dense nuclear matter.Eur

    Lavagno, A.; Pigato, D. Strangeness thermodynamic instabilities in hot and dense nuclear matter.Eur. Phys. J. A2022,58, 237. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00885-6

    doi

  35. [42]

    Testing deconfinement at high isospin density

    Di Toro, M.; Drago, A.; Gaitanos, T.; Greco, V .; Lavagno, A. Testing deconfinement at high isospin density. Nucl. Phys. A2006,775, 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.007

    2006 doi

  36. [43]

    Strangeness nucleation in neutron star matter.Phys

    Norsen, T. Strangeness nucleation in neutron star matter.Phys. Rev. C2002,65, 045805. https://doi.org/10 .1103/PhysRevC.65.045805

  37. [44]

    Surface tension of dense matter at the chiral phase transition.Phys

    Fraga, E.S.; Hippert, M.; Schmitt, A. Surface tension of dense matter at the chiral phase transition.Phys. Rev. D2019,99, 014046. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014046

    doi

  38. [45]

    Phase conversion in a weakly first-order quark-hadron transition.Phys

    Bessa, A.; Fraga, E.S.; Mintz, B.W. Phase conversion in a weakly first-order quark-hadron transition.Phys. Rev. D2009,79, 034012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.034012

    doi

  39. [46]

    Surface and Curvature Tensions of Cold, Dense Quark Matter: A Term-by-Term Analysis Within the Nambu–Jona–Lasinio Model.Universe2025,11, 29

    Grunfeld, A.G.; Izzo Villafañe, M.F.; Lugones, G. Surface and Curvature Tensions of Cold, Dense Quark Matter: A Term-by-Term Analysis Within the Nambu–Jona–Lasinio Model.Universe2025,11, 29. https: //doi.org/10.3390/universe11020029

    doi

  40. [47]

    Quark matter droplets in neutron stars.Phys

    Heiselberg, H.; Pethick, C.J.; Staubo, E.F. Quark matter droplets in neutron stars.Phys. Rev. Lett.1993, 70, 1355–1359. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1355. 32 of 33

    1993 doi

  41. [48]

    Droplets in the cold and dense linear sigma model with quarks.Phys

    Palhares, L.F.; Fraga, E.S. Droplets in the cold and dense linear sigma model with quarks.Phys. Rev. D2010, 82, 125018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.125018

    doi

  42. [49]

    Surface tension of hot and dense quark matter under strong magnetic fields

    Lugones, G.; Grunfeld, A.G. Surface tension of hot and dense quark matter under strong magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. C2019,99, 035804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.035804

    doi

  43. [50]

    Chiral pasta: Mixed phases at the chiral phase transition.Phys

    Schmitt, A. Chiral pasta: Mixed phases at the chiral phase transition.Phys. Rev. D2020,101, 074007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074007

    doi

  44. [51]

    Hadron-quark mixed phase in the quark-meson coupling model.Phys

    Ju, M.; Wu, X.; Ji, F.; Hu, J.; Shen, H. Hadron-quark mixed phase in the quark-meson coupling model.Phys. Rev. C2021,103, 025809. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.025809

    doi

  45. [52]

    Charge screening at first order phase transitions and hadron–quark mixed phase.Nucl

    Voskresensky, D.; Yasuhira, M.; Tatsumi, T. Charge screening at first order phase transitions and hadron–quark mixed phase.Nucl. Phys. A2003,723, 291–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9474 (03)01313-7

    doi

  46. [53]

    Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars.Rev

    Oertel, M.; Hempel, M.; Klähn, T.; Typel, S. Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars.Rev. Mod. Phys.2017,89. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.89.015007

    2017 doi

  47. [56]

    Collapsed nuclei.Phys

    Bodmer, A.R. Collapsed nuclei.Phys. Rev. D1971,4, 1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.4.1601

    doi

  48. [57]

    Early appearance of ∆ isobars in neutron stars.Phys

    Drago, A.; Lavagno, A.; Pagliara, G.; Pigato, D. Early appearance of ∆ isobars in neutron stars.Phys. Rev. C 2014,90, 065809. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.065809

    2014 doi

  49. [58]

    Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of the combustion of a neutron star into a quark star.Phys

    Herzog, M.; Ropke, F.K. Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of the combustion of a neutron star into a quark star.Phys. Rev. D2011,84, 083002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083002

    doi

  50. [59]

    Combustion of a hadronic star into a quark star: The turbulent and the diffusive regimes.Phys

    Drago, A.; Pagliara, G. Combustion of a hadronic star into a quark star: The turbulent and the diffusive regimes.Phys. Rev. C2015,92, 045801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.045801

    doi

  51. [60]

    Typel, S. et al. [CompOSE Core Team] CompOSE Reference Manual.Eur. Phys. J. A2022,58, 221. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00847-y

    doi

  52. [61]

    Relativistic Calculation of Nuclear Matter and the Nuclear Surface.Nucl

    Boguta, J.; Bodmer, A.R. Relativistic Calculation of Nuclear Matter and the Nuclear Surface.Nucl. Phys. A 1977,292, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90626-1

    1977 doi

  53. [62]

    Isospin asymmetry in nuclei and neutron stars.Phys

    Steiner, A.W.; Prakash, M.; Lattimer, J.M.; Ellis, P .J. Isospin asymmetry in nuclei and neutron stars.Phys. Rept.2005,411, 325–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.02.004

    2005 doi

  54. [63]

    Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations.Astrophys

    Steiner, A.W.; Hempel, M.; Fischer, T. Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations.Astrophys. J.2013,774, 17. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/17

    2013 doi

  55. [64]

    Transition to Delta matter from hot, dense nuclear matter within a relativistic mean field formulation of the nonlinear sigma and omega model.Phys

    Li, Z.X.; Mao, G.J.; Zhuo, Y.Z.; Greiner, W. Transition to Delta matter from hot, dense nuclear matter within a relativistic mean field formulation of the nonlinear sigma and omega model.Phys. Rev. C1997,56, 1570–1575. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56.1570

    doi

  56. [65]

    Hot and dense hadronic matter in an effective mean field approach.Phys

    Lavagno, A. Hot and dense hadronic matter in an effective mean field approach.Phys. Rev. C2010, 81, 044909. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044909

    doi

  57. [66]

    Strange hadronic matter.Phys

    Schaffner, J.; Dover, C.B.; Gal, A.; Greiner, C.; Stoecker, H. Strange hadronic matter.Phys. Rev. Lett.1993, 71, 1328–1331. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1328

    1993 doi

  58. [67]

    Hyperon rich matter in neutron stars.Phys

    Schaffner, J.; Mishustin, I.N. Hyperon rich matter in neutron stars.Phys. Rev. C1996,53, 1416–1429. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1416

    doi

  59. [68]

    Hyperons in hot dense matter: What do the constraints tell us for equation of state?Publ

    Fortin, M.; Oertel, M.; Providência, C. Hyperons in hot dense matter: What do the constraints tell us for equation of state?Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2018,35, e044. https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2018.32

    2018 doi

  60. [69]

    ∆ Selfenergy in Nuclear Matter.Nucl

    Oset, E.; Salcedo, L.L. ∆ Selfenergy in Nuclear Matter.Nucl. Phys. A1987,468, 631–652. https://doi.org/10 .1016/0375-9474(87)90185-0

  61. [70]

    Phenomenological approach to baryon resonance damping in nuclei.Phys

    Alberico, W.M.; Gervino, G.; Lavagno, A. Phenomenological approach to baryon resonance damping in nuclei.Phys. Lett. B1994,321, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)90460-X

    doi

  62. [71]

    Determination of the equation of state of dense matter.Science2002, 298, 1592–1596

    Danielewicz, P .; Lacey, R.; Lynch, W.G. Determination of the equation of state of dense matter.Science2002, 298, 1592–1596. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078070

    doi

  63. [72]

    Strange matter.Phys

    Farhi, E.; Jaffe, R.L. Strange matter.Phys. Rev. D1984,30, 2379–2390. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 30.2379

    doi

  64. [73]

    Quark Matter In Massive Neutron Stars.Astrophys

    Weissenborn, S.; Sagert, I.; Pagliara, G.; Hempel, M.; Schaffner-Bielich, J. Quark Matter In Massive Neutron Stars.Astrophys. J. Lett.2011,740, L14. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/740/1/L14

    2011 doi

  65. [74]

    Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions Triggered by a Quark- 33 of 33 Hadron Phase Transition During the Early Post-Bounce Phase.Astrophys

    Fischer, T.; Sagert, I.; Pagliara, G.; Hempel, M.; Schaffner-Bielich, J.; Rauscher, T.; Thielemann, F.K.; Käppeli, R.; Martínez-Pinedo, G.; Liebendörfer, M. Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions Triggered by a Quark- 33 of 33 Hadron Phase Transition During the Early Post-Bounce P...

    2011 doi

  66. [75]

    Glendenning, N.K.Compact Stars; Astronomy and Astrophysics Library; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012

    2012

  67. [76]

    Numerical Approximation to the Thermodynamic Integrals.Astrophys

    Johns, S.M.; Ellis, P .J.; Lattimer, J.M. Numerical Approximation to the Thermodynamic Integrals.Astrophys. J.1996,473, 1020. https://doi.org/10.1086/178212

    1996 doi

  68. [77]

    https://doi.org/10 .1007/978-3-642-12866-0

    Schmitt, A.Dense Matter in Compact Stars; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. https://doi.org/10 .1007/978-3-642-12866-0

    2010

  69. [78]

    Muons in the aftermath of neutron star mergers and their impact on trapped neutrinos.Astron

    Loffredo, E.; Perego, A.; Logoteta, D.; Branchesi, M. Muons in the aftermath of neutron star mergers and their impact on trapped neutrinos.Astron. Astrophys.2023,672, A124. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202244927

    2023 doi

  70. [79]

    g modes of neutron stars with hadron-to-quark crossover transitions.Phys

    Constantinou, C.; Han, S.; Jaikumar, P .; Prakash, M. g modes of neutron stars with hadron-to-quark crossover transitions.Phys. Rev. D2021,104, 123032. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123032

    doi

  71. [80]

    Framework for phase transitions between the Maxwell and Gibbs constructions.Phys

    Constantinou, C.; Zhao, T.; Han, S.; Prakash, M. Framework for phase transitions between the Maxwell and Gibbs constructions.Phys. Rev. D2023,107, 074013. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.074013. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data contained in al...

    doi

  72. [2702]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2698

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.