Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Decoding Cellular Temperature via Neural Network-Aided Fluorescent Thermometry

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A neural-network-aided fluorescent thermometer that separates viscosity from temperature finds mitochondrial temperature peaks near 42–43 °C, not the 50–53 °C reported earlier.

desk verdict A better-calibrated fluorescent thermometry study that probably gets the mitochondrial temperature ceiling right, but the headline error bar and environment-transfer assumptions need scrutiny before I'd trust the 42-43 °C bound as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00389 v1 pith:DKVAR5AJ submitted 2025-05-31 physics.bio-ph

Tong Zhang , Tian-Tian Li , Jing-Ru Wang , Yu-Wen Zhang , Chao Sun , Zheng Huang , Jing-Juan Xu , Bin Kang This is my paper
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords fluorescentthermometrymitochondrialtemperatureviscositydecouplingneuralnetworkratiometricprobefluorescencelifetimeintracellulargradientcellularthermogenesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to settle how hot mitochondria get inside living cells by removing an error source—viscosity—that has muddled fluorescent temperature readings. The authors build a neural-network-assisted thermometer that records two signals (a fluorescence ratio and a lifetime) and converts them, through a two-dimensional calibration matrix refined from solution to cell-like vesicles to fixed cells, into simultaneous maps of temperature and viscosity. With viscosity removed, they report that mitochondria run 1–4 °C warmer than cytoplasm but never exceed about 42–43 °C even under maximal calcium-stimulated heat production, and that lysosomes sit about 1 °C cooler than cytoplasm. If correct, this would mean earlier reports of 50–53 °C mitochondrial temperatures were viscosity artifacts, and it would reconcile cellular heat output with the known ~43 °C enzyme-stability limit.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a two-dimensional coefficient matrix relating two measured probe outputs—the ratio R of rhodamine-to-hemicyanin emission and the fluorescence lifetime tau—to two unknowns, temperature T and viscosity eta. A neural network supplies and refines the matrix weights, and the matrix is corrected sequentially against glycerol solutions, giant plasma membrane vesicles, and fixed cells with known uniform temperatures before being applied pixel-by-pixel to living cells. This matters because each of R and tau responds to both temperature and viscosity, so a one-dimensional calibration curve conflates the two; the matrix is what lets the method separate them.

What would settle it

Measure mitochondrial temperature under the same maximal Ca2+ shock using a viscosity-insensitive thermometer, such as nanodiamond or plasmonic thermometry, and check whether the highest local reading still stays below 43 °C; a reading above 43 °C would refute the claimed ceiling. Alternatively, independently vary cytoplasmic viscosity at fixed temperature and see whether the reported temperature changes—if it does, viscosity has not been fully decoupled.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a measurement: once cellular viscosity is explicitly measured and removed, living-cell temperature maps show a persistent 4–5 °C intracellular gradient, with mitochondria averaging 39.0 °C at a 37 °C ambient (40.1 °C after maximal Ca2+ shock), cytoplasm near 37.6 °C, and lysosomes near 36.7 °C; the highest local mitochondrial reading never exceeds 42 °C. The paper interprets this as evidence that the true physiological ceiling for mitochondrial temperature is 42–43 °C, matching the temperature at which mitochondrial respiratory complexes begin to degrade, and that previous estimates of 50–53 °C arose from viscosity-induced errors in one-dimensional fluorescence calibrations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that correcting the probe's coefficient matrix against fixed cells—whose temperature is assumed uniform and equal to the ambient—removes all living-cell-specific distortions except viscosity; if pH, membrane potential, crowding, or ionic strength shift the probe differently in live cells, the reported 42–43 °C ceiling could be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reports of mitochondrial temperatures near 50–53 °C are likely artifacts, and the true ceiling is consistent with enzyme inactivation around 43 °C.
  • Intracellular heat flow appears directional—mitochondria warmer, cytoplasm intermediate, lysosomes cooler—supporting active mitochondrial thermogenesis and transfer to the rest of the cell.
  • Mitochondrial morphology and temperature are linked: fused networks run cooler, fragmented mitochondria run hotter, so the fission–fusion balance shapes local heat production.
  • One-dimensional solution-calibrated fluorescent thermometers risk errors of order 0.5 °C or more inside cells, so simultaneous viscosity measurement is needed for reliable intracellular thermometry.
  • Bacterial invasion triggers a measurable thermal and rheological stress response, with cell temperature rising about 2 °C and viscosity rising about 1.3 mPa·s within 10–15 minutes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 42–43 °C ceiling is real, it implies an active mitochondrial heat-dissipation or thermoregulatory mechanism that keeps the organelle below enzyme-damage threshold even under uncoupling stress; a testable prediction is that stronger heat stimulation would trigger degradation or stress responses rather than higher temperatures.
  • The same two-dimensional calibration logic could be extended to decouple other confounds—such as pH, ionic strength, or oxygen—by adding more probe channels; the paper's approach predicts this would further improve accuracy in living cells.
  • The fixed-cell calibration assumes viscosity is the only living-cell-specific factor that shifts the probe response; an independent cross-check with a viscosity-insensitive thermometer under the same calcium-shock protocol would test that assumption directly.
  • The morphology–temperature correlation could be causal through reactive oxygen species: fragmented mitochondria produce more ROS and waste heat, so antioxidant treatment should lower the temperature of fragmented mitochondria if the link is ROS-driven.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a neural-network-aided fluorescent thermometry scheme that attempts to decouple temperature and viscosity in live-cell imaging. The probe provides a ratiometric intensity signal R and a fluorescence lifetime τ, and a two-dimensional response matrix is used to map (R, τ) to (T, η). The coefficient matrix is initialized in solution, then successively corrected using giant plasma membrane vesicles (GPMVs) and fixed cells, achieving a claimed precision of ±0.05 °C in fixed cells. The authors apply the method to living HeLa cells and report an intracellular temperature gradient of 4–5 °C, with mitochondria 1–4 °C warmer than the cytoplasm and lysosomes about 1 °C cooler. Under Ca2+ shock, FCCP, and bacterial infection, mitochondrial temperatures increase but reportedly never exceed 42–43 °C, which the authors interpret as an upper limit consistent with enzyme thermal stability. The paper also reports a correlation between mitochondrial fusion/fission morphology and temperature, and dynamic temperature/viscosity changes during S. aureus infection.

Significance. If the central claim holds—that mitochondrial temperature is bounded by ~42–43 °C once viscosity artifacts are removed—this would directly address a long-standing controversy regarding reports of 50–53 °C mitochondria and would support the idea that prior high readings were viscosity-induced artifacts. The calibration chain from solution to GPMVs to fixed cells is a genuine methodological improvement over single-curve calibration, and the use of a two-dimensional (T, η) response is a sensible approach to a known confound. The manuscript also provides a concrete falsifiable prediction (mitochondrial temperature ceiling bounded by enzyme inactivation temperature) and connects temperature to mitochondrial morphology, which could be of broad interest to the biophysics and cell biology communities. However, as discussed in the major comments, the validation of the key quantitative claim rests on an in-sample fixed-cell correction whose transfer to living mitochondria is not independently established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2d–f and 'The evolution and correction of coefficient matrix'] The ±0.05 °C cellular accuracy is an in-sample residual: the coefficient matrix is corrected using fixed cells at known ambient temperatures and then validated on the same fixed-cell dataset. The text states that after correction 'the temperature measurement accuracy within the cells also reached ±0.05 °C' (Fig. 2f), but this is not an out-of-sample test. To support the claimed accuracy, the authors should use a held-out set of fixed-cell images, cross-validation, or an independent validation target (e.g., GPMVs after fixed-cell correction). Without this, the quoted precision does not establish the accuracy of the matrix in living cells.
  2. [Fig. 2d–f and transfer to living cells] The transfer of the corrected coefficient matrix to living cells assumes that viscosity is the only living-cell-specific variable that shifts the probe response. The authors acknowledge the probe is a cationic dye that accumulates in mitochondria partly via membrane potential, and that living mitochondria differ from fixed cells in pH, ionic strength, crowding, and local dye concentration. Solution-level pH and ionic-strength controls (Supplementary Note 6) do not reproduce the living mitochondrial microenvironment, particularly the membrane-potential regime. Any environment-dependent change in R or τ that differs between fixed and living mitochondria would be absorbed as a temperature offset during fixed-cell correction, directly biasing the reported 42–43 °C ceiling. The manuscript should provide a test that distinguishes temperature from such environmental effects in living cells, or explicitly quantify the possible magnitude of this bias.
  3. [Eq. (1) and 'The evolution and correction of coefficient matrix'] The neural-network method is described only schematically. Equation (1) defines a matrix operation, but neither the coefficient matrix nor the training procedure is specified: no architecture, loss function, regularization, number of parameters, training set size, or uncertainty propagation. This makes it impossible to judge whether the claimed decoupling of T and η is genuine or whether the network is overfitting the calibration data. The authors should provide a complete description of the neural network, including the exact relation between the 'coefficient matrix' and network weights, and an analysis of how uncertainties in R and τ propagate to T and η.
  4. [Results, 'Temperatures on different organelles'] The claim that 'the highest measured temperature do not exceed 42 °C' under maximal Ca2+ shock is based on an unspecified number of cells and pixels, and the text does not report a statistical upper bound or confidence interval. Given that the measured mitochondrial average under stimulation is 40.1 °C and the claimed measurement precision is 0.05 °C, the statement of a hard 42–43 °C ceiling needs a clear statement of the number of independent measurements, the pixel-level distribution, and how the 'highest measured temperature' was derived from that distribution. Without this, the ceiling claim is not quantitatively supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] There are typographical and grammatical errors, e.g., 'the question on of' and 'promotes better understanding' should read 'promote a better understanding'.
  2. [Results, 'Temperatures on different organelles'] The phrase 'the highest measured temperature do not exceed 42 °C' has a subject-verb agreement error ('temperature do not exceed' should be 'temperatures do not exceed').
  3. [Fig. 4d–e] The temperature color scale is not shown consistently across panels; adding a unified scale bar and color map would improve readability.
  4. [Results, 'Mitochondrial temperature and function'] The statistical tests behind the asterisks in Fig. 5e are not described in the Methods; the authors should specify the test used and the number of biological replicates.
  5. [Discussion] The Discussion states that lysosomes are '2-6 °C lower than mitochondria', which is a wider range than the ~2.5 °C difference reported in the Results; the manuscript should reconcile these values.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One in-sample calibration-validation loop; the central mitochondrial ceiling is not a fitted input.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, 'The evolution and correction of coefficient matrix' (Fig. 2e-f)]
    "Next, we applied the calibrated coefficient matrix from the GPMVs to fixed cells and found a deviation of ~0.5 °C within the setting temperature range of 27–42 °C (Fig. 2d). ... After correction of the coefficient matrix, the temperature measurement accuracy within the cells also reached ±0.05 °C (Fig. 2f)."

    The fixed-cell dataset is first used as the correction target: the matrix is refined until fixed cells read the assumed ambient (uniform) temperature. The same fixed-cell dataset is then used to report the 'accuracy' of ±0.05 °C. This is an in-sample training residual, not an out-of-sample validation, so the precision claim is forced by construction. The headlined living-cell mitochondrial bound is not itself circular, because no living-cell temperature served as a training target.

full rationale

The derivation chain is mostly self-contained: the two-dimensional (R, τ) -> (T, η) mapping is trained on solution, GPMV, and fixed-cell data whose temperatures are set externally, and the living-cell mitochondrial temperatures are not used as regression targets. Thus the 42-43 °C ceiling is not equivalent to a fitted parameter by the paper's own equations. The only clear circularity is the fixed-cell validation loop: the same fixed cells used to correct the coefficient matrix are used to claim ±0.05 °C accuracy, which is an in-sample error. The fixed-cell calibration also depends on the assumption that fixed cells are uniform at ambient temperature, an assumption that is load-bearing for transferring the matrix to living cells, but this is a validity risk rather than a definitional reduction. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is present; ref. 30 is author-authored background support, not the basis of the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement chain consumes three fitted quantities: the coefficient matrix (trained in solution, corrected on GPMVs and fixed cells), the correction gains at each transfer step, and the segmentation parameters that assign pixels to organelles. The axioms listed are unproved background assumptions the temperature readout depends on; none is machine-checked or independently reproduced in the main text. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Coefficient matrix (neural network weights) = not disclosed in main text
    Maps the two readouts (R, tau) to (T, eta); established in solution and then mutated by correction steps in GPMVs and fixed cells. All subsequent temperature values are outputs of this fitted map.
  • Environment-transfer correction gains = implicit, from GPMV and fixed-cell errors (0.1-0.3 °C and ~0.5 °C before correction)
    Each evolution step adjusts the matrix so that GPMV and fixed-cell readings match ambient temperature; these corrections are fitted to assumed ground truths.
  • Neural network hyperparameters and training rule = deferred to Supplementary Note 7
    Architecture depth, learning rate, and regularization are chosen by hand; without them the decoupling procedure is under-specified.
  • Segmentation and registration thresholds for organelle assignment = not disclosed
    Pixels are assigned to mitochondria, lysosomes, or cytoplasm by co-localization thresholds and registration parameters; these affect which pixels enter the organelle temperature statistics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption R and tau are joint sufficient statistics for (T, eta); any other variable affecting the probe is either controlled or negligible.
    The whole decoupling rests on this. pH and ionic strength are checked in solution (Supplementary Note 6), but organelle-specific environments such as membrane potential and protein crowding are not controlled in the living-cell transfer.
  • domain assumption Fixed cells are at thermal equilibrium with the environment, with uniform interior temperature equal to ambient.
    Stated in the fixed-cell calibration paragraph: 'the temperature distribution inside becomes uniform.' This is the ground truth on which the final correction of the coefficient matrix is based.
  • standard math The coefficient matrix (linear or network) mapping readouts to (T, eta) is invertible and well-conditioned over the biological range.
    No conditioning, identifiability, or error-propagation analysis is given in the main text; the claimed 0.05 °C precision presumes the inverted map does not amplify noise.
  • domain assumption Steady intracellular temperature gradients of 4-5 °C are physically sustainable despite thermal diffusion.
    The paper reports such gradients and cites the opposing critique (ref 7) that thermal diffusion makes them hard to sustain, but offers no heat-transfer calculation of its own.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decoding Cellular Temperature via Neural Network-Aided Fluorescent Thermometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DKVAR5AJ

@misc{pith2026250600389,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decoding Cellular Temperature via Neural Network-Aided Fluorescent Thermometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DKVAR5AJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00389}
}
read the original abstract

The temperature distribution within cells, especially the debates on mitochondrial temperature, has recently attracted widespread attention. Some studies have claimed that the temperature of mitochondria can reach up to 50-53 degrees Celsius. Yet others have questioned that this is due to measurement errors from fluorescent thermometry caused by other factors, like cell viscosity. Here we present a neural network-aided fluorescent thermometry and decouple the effect of cellular viscosity on temperature measurements. We found that cellular viscosity may cause significant deviations in temperature measurements. We investigated the dynamic temperature changes in different organelles within the cell under stimulation and observed a distinct temperature gradient within the cell. Eliminating the influence of viscosity, the upper limit of mitochondrial temperature does not exceed 42-43 degrees Celsius, supporting our knowledge about the inactivation temperature of enzymes. The temperature of mitochondria is closely related to their functions and morphology, such as fission and fusion. Our results help to clarify the question of "how hot are mitochondria?" and promote a better understanding on cellular thermodynamics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zhou, J., del Rosal, B., Jaque, D. et al. Advances and challenges for fluorescence nanothermometry. Nat Methods 17, 967–980 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Inada, N., Fukuda, N., Hayashi, T. et al. Temperature imaging using a cationic linear fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Nat Protoc 14, 1293–1321 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    & Nakabayashi, T

    Sugimura, T., Kajimoto, S. & Nakabayashi, T. Label -free imaging of intracellular temperature by using the O–H stretching Raman band of water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 7755–7760 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    & Lee, J

    Lee, Y ., Kim, K., Kim, D. & Lee, J. S. Organelle -specific quantum thermometry using fluorescent nanodiamonds: insights into cellular metabolic thermodynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 13180−13189 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    -T., Jastroch, M., Jacobs, H

    Chré tien, D., Bé nit, P., Ha, H.-H., Keipert, S., El -Khoury, R., Chang, Y. -T., Jastroch, M., Jacobs, H. T., Rustin, P. & Rak, M. Mitochondria are physiologically maintained at close to 50 ° C. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003992 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Mitochondrial temperature homeostasis resists external metabolic stresses

    Terzioglu , M., Veeroja, K., Montonen, T., et al. Mitochondrial temperature homeostasis resists external metabolic stresses. eLife 12, eRP89232 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    & Jullien, L

    Baffou, G., Rigneault, H., Marguet, D. & Jullien, L. A critique of methods for temperature imaging in single cells. Nat. Methods 11, 899–901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Hot mitochondria? PLoS Biol

    Lane, N. Hot mitochondria? PLoS Biol. 16, e2005113 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    L., Wang, L., Liu, X

    Su, D., Teoh, C. L., Wang, L., Liu, X. & Chang, Y. T. Motion -induced change in emission (MICE) for developing fluorescent probes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 4833 –4844 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    A., Ferná ndez-Silva, P

    Moreno-Loshuertos, R., Marco -Brualla, J., Meade, P., Soler -Agesta, R., Enriquez, J. A., Ferná ndez-Silva, P. How hot can mitochondria be? Incubation at temperatures above 43 ° C induces the degradation of respiratory complexes and supercomplexes in intact cells and isolated ...

    2023

  3. [11]

    Chen, C., Buhl, E., Xu, M. et al. Drosophila Ionotropic Receptor 25a mediates circadian clock resetting by temperature. Nature 527, 516–520 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Heintzman, D. R. et al. Subset-specific mitochondrial stress and DNA damage shape T cell responses to fever and inflammation. Sci. Immunol. 9, eadp3475 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Seki, T., Yang, Y ., Sun, X. et al. Brown-fat-mediated tumour suppression by cold -altered global metabolism. Nature 608, 421–428 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    B., Ambati, V

    Persson, L. B., Ambati, V . S., & Brandman, O. Cellular control of viscosity counters changes in temperature and energy availability. Cell 183, 1572–1585 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    FGF13 selectively regulates heat nociception by interacting with Nav1.7

    Yang L., Dong F., Yang Q., et al. FGF13 selectively regulates heat nociception by interacting with Nav1.7. Neuron 93, 806–821 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Brites, C. D. S., Marin, R., Suta, M., Carneiro Neto, A. N., Ximendes, E., Jaque, D., & Carlos, L. D. Spotlight on Lumines cence Thermometry: Basics, Challenges, and Cutting - Edge Applications. Adv. Mater. 35, 2302749 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    C., Yao, N

    Kucsko, G., Maurer, P. C., Yao, N. Y ., Kubo, M., Noh, H. J., Lo, P. K., Park, H. & Lukin, M. D. Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell. Nature 500, 54–58 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    & Jiang, D

    Ding, H., Liu, K., Zhao, X., Su, B. & Jiang, D. Thermoelectric nanofluidics probing thermal heterogeneity inside single cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 22433−22441 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Okabe, K., Inada, N., Gota, C. et al. Intracellular temperature mapping with a fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Nat Commun 3, 705 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Vyšniauskas, A., Qurashi, M., Gallop, N., Balaz, M., Anderson, H. L. & Kuimova, M. K. Unravelling the effect of temperature on viscosity -sensitive fluorescent molecular rotors. Chem. Sci. 6, 5773–5778 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Mitochondria -anchored molecular thermometer quantitatively monitoring cellular inflamations

    Huang, Z., Li, N., Zhang, X., & Xiao, Y. Mitochondria -anchored molecular thermometer quantitatively monitoring cellular inflamations. Anal. Chem. 93, 5081−5088 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Quantum dot nano thermometers reveal heterogeneous local thermogenesis in living cells

    Yang, J.-M., Yang, H., & Lin, L. Quantum dot nano thermometers reveal heterogeneous local thermogenesis in living cells. ACS Nano 5, 5067–5071 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    & Poggioni, V

    Baioletti, M., Di Bari, G., Milani, A. & Poggioni, V. Differential evolution for neural networks optimization. Mathematics 8, 69 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Wang Y., Yao Y. & Gao Z. An extrapolation -driven network architecture for physics - informed deep learning. Neural Netw. 183, 106998 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    -J., Baumgart, T., Schwille, P., Simons, K

    Sezgin, E., Kaiser, H. -J., Baumgart, T., Schwille, P., Simons, K. & Levental, I. Elucidating membrane structure and protein behavior using giant plasma membrane vesicles. Nat Protoc 7, 1042–1051 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Marx, J. L. Organizing the Cytoplasm: An intricate, interconnected array of filaments in the cytoplasm gives this part of the cell more order and complexity than was once thought. Science 222, 1109–1111 (1983)

    1983

  19. [27]

    Miranda-Lorenzo, I., Dorado, J., Lonardo, E. et al. Intracellular autofluorescence: a biomarker for epithelial cancer stem cells. Nat Methods 11, 1161–1169 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Morrow, C. S. et al. Autofluorescence is a biomarker of neural stem cell activa tion state. Cell Stem Cell 31, 570–581 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Tsagkaraki, E., Nicoloro, S.M., DeSouza, T. et al. CRISPR -enhanced human adipocyte browning as cell therapy for metabolic disease. Nat Commun 12, 6931 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    -J., & Chen, H

    Song, P., Gao, H., Gao, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, R., Ka ng, B., Xu, J. -J., & Chen, H. -Y. Heat transfer and thermoregulation within single cells revealed by transient plasmonic imaging. Chem, 7, 1569–1587 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Budin, I., de Rond, T., Chen, Y., Chan, L. J. G., Petzold, C. J., & Keasling, J. D. Viscous control of cellular respiration by membrane lipid composition. Science, 362, 1186–1189 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Ryu, K.W., Fung, T.S., Baker, D.C. et al. Cellular ATP demand creates metabolically distinct subpopulations of mitochondria. Nature 635, 746–754 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    The mitochondrial calcium uniporter engages UCP1 to form a thermoporter that promotes thermogenesis

    Xue, K., Wu, D., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Shen, H., Yao, J., Huang, X., Li, X., Zhou, Z., Wang, Z., & Qiu, Y. The mitochondrial calcium uniporter engages UCP1 to form a thermoporter that promotes thermogenesis. Cell Metab. 34, 1325–1341.e6 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    E., Hubbard, B

    LaMoia, T. E., Hubbard, B. T. , Guerra, M. T. et al. Cytosolic calcium regulates hepatic mitochondrial oxidation, intrahepatic lipolysis, and gluconeogenesis via CAMKII activation. Cell Metab. 36, 2329–2340 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Parzych, K. R. & Klionsky, D. J. An Overview of Autophagy: Morphology, Mechanism, and Regulation. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 20, 460–473 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    de Lichtervelde, A. C. L., de Souza, J. P., & Bazant, M. Z. Heat of nervous conduction: A thermodynamic fra mework. Phys. Rev. E 101, 022406 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Spatiotemporally mapping temperature dynamics of lysosomes and mitochondria using cascade organelle -targeting upconversion nanoparticle s

    Di, X., Wang, D., Su, Q.P., Liu, Y., Liao, J., Maddahfar, M., Zhou, J., Jin, D. Spatiotemporally mapping temperature dynamics of lysosomes and mitochondria using cascade organelle -targeting upconversion nanoparticle s. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2207402119 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Shi, M., Huang, XY., Ren, XY. et al. AIDA directly connects sympathetic innervation to adaptive thermogenesis by UCP1. Nat Cell Biol 23, 268–277 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Bertholet, A. M. & Kirichok, Y. Mitochondrial H + Leak and Thermogenesis. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 84, 381–407 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Grav, H. J. & Blix, A. S. A source of nonshivering thermogenesis in fur seal skeletal muscle. Science 204, 87–90 (1979)

    1979

  33. [41]

    Mitochondrial uncoupling: a key controller of biological processes in physiology and di seases

    Demine S, Renard P & Arnould T. Mitochondrial uncoupling: a key controller of biological processes in physiology and di seases. Cells 8, 795 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    & Whiting, D.A

    Ahmad-Junan, S.A., Amos, P.C., Cockerill, G.S., Levett, P.C. & Whiting, D.A. Synthetic studies on electron transport inhibitors related to natural products. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 22, 237–241 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    Liu, X. et al. Force-induced tail-autotomy mitochondrial fission and biogenesis of matrix-excluded mitochondrial -derived vesicles for quality control. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2217019121 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Gao, S. & Hu, J. Mitochondrial fusion: The machineries in and out. Trends Cell Biol . 31, 62–74 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Zhu, L. et al. Controllable mitochondrial aggregation and fusion by a programmable DNA binder. Chem. Sci. 14, 8084–8094 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Yue, W. et al. A small natural molecule promotes mitochondrial fusion through inhibition of the deubiquitina se USP30. Cell Res. 24, 482–496 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Supramolecular induction of mitochondrial aggregation and fusion

    Sun, C., Wang, Z., Yue, L., Huang, Q., Cheng, Q., & Wang, R. Supramolecular induction of mitochondrial aggregation and fusion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 16523 – 16527 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Cassidy-Stone, A. et al. Chemical inhibition of the mitochondrial division dynamin reveals its role in Bax/Bak -dependent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization. Dev. Cell 14, 193–204 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    B., Sá nchez-Guerrero, Á., Milosevic, I., & Raimundo, N

    Fonseca, T. B., Sá nchez-Guerrero, Á., Milosevic, I., & Raimundo, N. Mitochondrial fission requires DRP1 but not dynamins. Nature 570, E35–E42 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Yu, T., Robotham, J. L. & Yoon, Y. Increased production of reactive oxygen species in hyperglycemic conditions requires dynamic change of mitochondrial morphology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U SA 103, 2653–2658 (2006)

    2006

  43. [51]

    Shenouda, S. M. et al. Altered mitochondrial dynamics contributes to endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Circulation 124, 444–453 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Meiring, J.E., Khanam, F., Basnyat, B. et al. Typhoid fever. Nat Rev Dis Primers 9, 71 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    GBD 2019 Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 400, 2221–2248 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    & Vanholsbeeck F

    Guo R., McGoverin C., Swift S. & Vanholsbeeck F. A rapid and low -cost estimation of bacteria counts in solution using fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 409, 3959–3967 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    J., Yoo, J

    Arai, S., Suzuki, M., Park, S. J., Yoo, J. S., Wang, L., Kang, N. Y., Ha, H. H., & Chang, Y . T. Mitochondria -targeted fluorescent thermometer monitors intracellular temperature gradient. Chem. Commun. 51, 8044–8047 (2015). Acknowledgements This work was mainly supported by t...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.