Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 170 references

Position: Olfaction Standardization is Essential for the Advancement of Embodied Artificial Intelligence

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This position paper argues that olfaction is missing from AI because of five structural, fixable gaps—no settled smell science, no data standard, no objective labels, scarce datasets, and no benchmarks—and that closing them should make…

desk verdict A well-cited, coherent agenda paper that deserves peer review; the main soft spot is the Section 2.1 claim that standardization can outpace scientific consensus, which the authors should defend more explicitly. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00398 v1 pith:BUNTYH4V submitted 2025-05-31 cs.AI cs.RO

Kordel K. France , Rohith Peddi , Nik Dennler , Ovidiu Daescu This is my paper
classification cs.AIcs.RO
keywords artificialolfactionembodiedAIolfactorydatastandardmachinebenchmarksdatasetsmultimodalperceptionneuromorphicethics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that AI's neglect of the sense of smell is not a sign that smell is unimportant, but the result of five structural gaps that can be fixed. Those gaps are the absence of settled science on how odor perception works, the lack of a standard format for olfactory data, the difficulty of labeling signals that humans may not consciously detect, the scarcity of large datasets, and the absence of AI benchmarks for olfaction. The authors' position is that standardization can proceed in parallel with open scientific debates, just as image and audio formats were standardized without a complete model of perception. If they are right, closing these gaps would let machine olfaction grow at the pace vision and language did, and would make smell a core sensory input for embodied and multimodal AI. The paper's proposed first step is the creation of an olfactory data standard built from raw, digitized sensor recordings of molecular signatures, collected under controlled conditions and paired with consensus-based human annotations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the proposed olfactory data standard, modeled on the way image and audio standards turned raw physical measurements into shared digital formats. Receptor arrays are treated as the analogue of pixels, signal intensity as the analogue of dynamic range, and the standard itself as the substrate that makes datasets from different labs compatible. Around that substrate the paper organizes its case into five named gaps—scientific understanding, data standard, objective annotation, datasets, and benchmarks—with the standard and benchmark suite doing the causal work of catalyzing progress. A supporting mechanism is the paper's bandwidth calculation, which ranks olfaction as a high-throughput sense and motivates event-based, neuromorphic processing for the sparse, intermittent plumes that carry odor stimuli in natural environments.

What would settle it

A concrete test: build the proposed standardized olfactory dataset from raw sensor recordings with calibrated molecular ground truth, train equivalent models on it and on today's ad hoc small datasets, and compare both on the same real-world scent-source localization task; if the standardized data yields no measurable advantage in accuracy or generalization, the claim that missing standards are the key bottleneck would be weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the exclusion of olfaction from AI architectures is a correctable infrastructure failure rather than a sign of irrelevance. The paper asserts that objective progress can be made without first resolving the debate between shape-based and vibration-based theories of odor detection: raw, digitized sensor data capturing molecular signatures can serve as a common substrate, with human semantic labels added as layered, consensus-based annotations. It estimates human olfactory bandwidth above five kilobytes per second, placing smell third behind vision and hearing, and notes that canines likely exceed that by about twenty times, which makes superhuman machine olfaction a plausible engineering goal. The conclusion the paper draws is that a coordinated investment in standards, datasets, and benchmarks would let olfactory embeddings join visual and language embeddings in multimodal models, enabling embodied systems to locate odor sources, navigate by scent, and reason about scenes with chemical information.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that data standards, datasets, and benchmarks can be built and remain useful before the science of smell is settled; if the right way to represent odor turns out to depend on that unsettled science, early standards could encode a wrong abstraction and much of the proposed investment would be wasted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A shared olfactory data format would let research groups pool raw sensor recordings, ending the current fragmentation in which datasets from different labs cannot be compared or combined.
  • Benchmark suites modeled on large-scale vision and language evaluation templates would make machine smell measurable and attract research effort comparable to that given to other modalities.
  • Embodied systems could take on scent-based tasks such as gas-leak localization, plume tracking, food and crop quality assessment, breath-based diagnostics, and olfaction-visual reasoning in static and moving scenes.
  • Treating a person's odor profile as sensitive personal data would expand AI ethics beyond vision, language, and audio, requiring consent rules and auditing procedures for olfactory models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An editorial inference: the paper's own bandwidth arithmetic sets a concrete engineering target it does not name—a canine-level machine nose needs roughly twenty times human olfactory throughput, so sensor arrays and processors should be designed against that budget from the start.
  • An editorial inference: because odor signals arrive as short bursts separated by clean air, an event-based representation may fit olfaction better than fixed-frame recordings, and the standard should arguably be built around plume structure rather than continuous sampling.
  • An editorial inference: the paper identifies breath and body odor as future personal data but stops short of designing for it; a natural extension is that olfactory benchmarks should include consent, privacy, and audit protocols as first-class components from the outset.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This position paper argues that olfaction has been systematically neglected in AI research, not because it is irrelevant to embodied intelligence but because of five structural gaps: unresolved competing theories of olfactory coding (STO vs. VTO), heterogeneous sensor technologies and the absence of a data standard, the subjectivity of semantic labels, a lack of large-scale peer-reviewed datasets, and the absence of AI-oriented benchmarks. After reviewing bandwidth estimates and sensor properties, the paper proposes a parallel-progress model in which standardization and scientific understanding of olfaction develop together, and it sketches three classes of benchmark tasks (foundational perception, static-scene olfaction, dynamic-scene olfaction) plus ethical considerations. The central recommendation is a community-wide investment in olfactory data standards, datasets, and benchmarks comparable to those available for vision and language.

Significance. This is a timely and clearly written position piece that identifies a real gap in embodied AI research and proposes a concrete set of actions. If the main argument holds, it could help refocus community resources toward olfactory datasets, benchmarks, and standards, in the same way that earlier position pieces catalyzed investment in other modalities. The paper's strengths include: a literature-grounded enumeration of five structural gaps; a transparent first-order bandwidth model with explicit anatomical assumptions; reproducible publication-count queries with code and a stated limitation (Supplementary A); and a detailed taxonomy of benchmark tasks that goes beyond slogans. The central claim is not circular: the argument does not depend on the authors' own prior results, and self-citations appear only as supporting examples. The main weakness is the unexamined feasibility of standardizing olfaction before the receptor-coding question is resolved, which is the focus of the major comments below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.1 (parallel-progress claim); Section 2.4 (raw sensor data)] The paper's load-bearing premise — 'scientific progress and standardization process can move forward in parallel' — is not established by the analogies given. JPEG/PNG standardization did not require understanding the visual cortex, but it did presuppose a settled front-end physical representation: images are sampled spatially and trichromatically (RGB/YUV), a convention that was not in dispute. In olfaction, the analogous 'pixel' is exactly what is contested: Section 2.2 lists MOx, electrochemical, optical, acoustic, and carbon-nanotube sensors, and Sections 2.1 and 2.2 describe the unresolved STO/VTO debate. Aircraft airworthiness standards are functional safety criteria (e.g., margins, inspection intervals), not sensory-data representations; they do not address the risk that a standard encodes a wrong abstraction. The paper's own remedy in Section 2.4 (collecting 'raw, digitized sensor data') yields device-specific time series, not a modality-level standard, unless an additional theory-neutral layer (e.g., calibration metadata, transducer-agnostic event descriptors, and task-specific evaluation protocols) is specified. Without such a layer, the paper has not shown that a standard can be both built now and robust to the eventual resolution of the receptor-coding question. If the right representation depends on the STO/VTO outcome, datasets and benchmarks built on the wrong representation would partly waste the investment the paper calls for. The authors should either specify a theory-neutral standard layer or soften the claim to 'standardize multiple candidate representations in parallel,' which would change the title's assertion.
  2. [Section 2.4 (object of standardization)] The paper never defines what 'standard' it is calling for. Gap 2 in Section 1 lists both 'standardized data representation' and 'hardware specification,' while Section 2.4 recommends 'standardized protocols for sensor calibration, data acquisition, and comprehensive annotation' and Section 2.5 calls for benchmark tasks. These are different objects: a data format, a hardware interface, an annotation protocol, and an evaluation metric are not interchangeable, and a single 'olfactory data standard' cannot serve all of them simultaneously. In particular, the recommendation to collect 'raw, digitized sensor data' is a per-instrument convention, not a modality-level standard: raw MOx conductance values and raw optical spectra share no common vector space. The authors should specify which layer they propose to standardize (transducer output encoding, calibration metadata, task-level evaluation, or all three) and how that layer interacts with the unresolved representation question raised in Section 2.1. Without this specification, the central call to action is ambiguous and difficult to evaluate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.2 (bandwidth)] The bandwidth calculation does not match the stated assumptions. With 400 ORN types, 2 glomeruli each, 25 mitral cells per glomerulus, 4 bits per cell, and 1 Hz sniffing, the rate is 400 × 2 × 25 × 4 = 80,000 bit/s = 10 kB/s, not '>5 kB/s' as printed. Use the correct value or revise the assumptions; the qualitative claim that olfaction is a high-bandwidth channel is unaffected.
  2. [Figure 1 and Section A (publication counts)] The publication-count comparison is not apples-to-apples: olfaction is counted by title keywords, while the comparator fields are counted by arXiv category. This likely undercounts olfaction (e.g., papers using 'electronic nose' or 'gas sensor array' without the listed keywords). State in the caption and text that the reported ratios are lower bounds, not precise measurements.
  3. [Section 3 (OVLM citations)] The claim that 'Emerging olfaction-vision-language models (OVLMs)' are exemplified by references [61,133] relies on a commercial mobile application rather than a peer-reviewed model; replace these citations with a scholarly reference or rephrase as 'early commercial demonstrations.'
  4. [Section 2.1 (Turin citation)] The text says 'Luca Turin re-popularized the idea in 2001' but the cited reference [145] is a 2015 PNAS correspondence; add the original 1996 Nature paper or a 2001 source to support the date.
  5. [Section 2.2 (encoding paragraph)] The paragraph on encoding claims olfaction 'forms a discrete space' and later emphasizes 'episodic, rather than continuous, sampling'; these two notions (discrete molecular-space encoding vs. temporal sparsity) should be explicitly separated, because a standard must handle both dimensions.
  6. [Throughout (typos)] Fix inconsistent spacing in 'W A V', 'A VI', 'V on Neumann', and 'ArXiV' (Sections 1 and 2.2, Figure 1).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a position argument whose load-bearing premises are supported by external, independently reproducible literature and its own first-order estimates, not by fitted values or self-citation chains.

full rationale

This is a position paper, not an empirical derivation, so the standard circularity patterns (fitted inputs renamed as predictions, self-referential uniqueness theorems, ansatz smuggled via citation) do not apply. The central claim is that olfaction is neglected in AI because of five structural challenges and that standardization, datasets, and benchmarks would advance embodied AI. Each supporting step is grounded in external literature: the unresolved STO/VTO debate cites Dyson, Turin, Block, and others; the sensor heterogeneity discussion cites multiple independent sensor-technology sources; the publication-disparity figure is a reproducible bibliometric query; and the olfactory bandwidth estimate is an explicit first-order calculation from cited neurobiological parameters (sniff rate, receptor counts, mitral-cell counts, spike rates), not an input assumed from the conclusion. Self-citations appear only as illustrative supporting examples (e.g., a high-speed electronic nose, dataset limitations, procedural-activity datasets, and an olfaction-vision-language app) and are not load-bearing: the argument would stand unchanged if those citations were removed. The weakest point, flagged by the skeptical reader, is the Section 2.1 analogy that scientific progress and standardization can proceed in parallel despite unresolved olfactory theory, but that is a substantive argumentative weakness about whether the proposed standard could encode a wrong abstraction; it is not circularity by construction or by self-citation. Under the hard rules, no specific reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs can be exhibited, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the central position is an argument, not a model. The bandwidth estimate takes physiological inputs from cited literature plus a 4-bit encoding choice, none tuned to force a target result. The axioms are the domain assumptions that make the position's evidence load-bearing.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standardization of olfactory data can proceed in parallel with unresolved scientific theories of smell.
    Section 2.1 asserts the JPEG and aircraft analogies; the entire call for early benchmark construction depends on this premise.
  • domain assumption Human olfactory bandwidth can be estimated from anatomical counts (400 ORN types, 2 glomeruli each, 25 mitral cells per glomerulus, 0-13 spikes) and yields the third-highest sensory throughput.
    Section 2.2, the bandwidth paragraph, uses this to claim olfaction's importance in the hierarchy of senses.
  • domain assumption Olfactory coding is discrete and combinatorial rather than continuous, so it needs a different data standard than images or audio.
    Section 2.2, encoding paragraph, cites refs on combinatorial receptor codes and sparse activation; the case for a bespoke standard rests on this.
  • domain assumption Relative neglect of olfaction is measurable by title-only searches of arXiv and Semantic Scholar categories.
    Supplementary A; the 'less than 1%' claim depends on this search strategy, which may miss sensor-science and chemistry venues.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Position: Olfaction Standardization is Essential for the Advancement of Embodied Artificial Intelligence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BUNTYH4V

@misc{pith2026250600398,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Position: Olfaction Standardization is Essential for the Advancement of Embodied Artificial Intelligence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BUNTYH4V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00398}
}
read the original abstract

Despite extraordinary progress in artificial intelligence (AI), modern systems remain incomplete representations of human cognition. Vision, audition, and language have received disproportionate attention due to well-defined benchmarks, standardized datasets, and consensus-driven scientific foundations. In contrast, olfaction - a high-bandwidth, evolutionarily critical sense - has been largely overlooked. This omission presents a foundational gap in the construction of truly embodied and ethically aligned super-human intelligence. We argue that the exclusion of olfactory perception from AI architectures is not due to irrelevance but to structural challenges: unresolved scientific theories of smell, heterogeneous sensor technologies, lack of standardized olfactory datasets, absence of AI-oriented benchmarks, and difficulty in evaluating sub-perceptual signal processing. These obstacles have hindered the development of machine olfaction despite its tight coupling with memory, emotion, and contextual reasoning in biological systems. In this position paper, we assert that meaningful progress toward general and embodied intelligence requires serious investment in olfactory research by the AI community. We call for cross-disciplinary collaboration - spanning neuroscience, robotics, machine learning, and ethics - to formalize olfactory benchmarks, develop multimodal datasets, and define the sensory capabilities necessary for machines to understand, navigate, and act within human environments. Recognizing olfaction as a core modality is essential not only for scientific completeness, but for building AI systems that are ethically grounded in the full scope of the human experience.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00398 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The number of publications from ArXiV [39] and Semantic Scholar [88] over the period 1 January 2015 to 1 May 2025 in computer vision (CV), natural language processing (NLP), computer audio (CA), and artificial olfaction (AO). (a) illustrates the total number of publications in each category as retrieved from the ArXiv and Semantic Scholar databases. (b) shows the temporal trend in published research for each categor… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Analogy of olfaction to computer vision. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustrates how standardized olfactory data and models can integrate with other modalities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of perception versus precision in olfaction. The solid orange curve indicates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Warner, Sina Tootoonian, Izumi Fukunaga, Julia J

    Tobias Ackels, Andrew Erskine, Debanjan Dasgupta, Alina Cristina Marin, Tom P.A. Warner, Sina Tootoonian, Izumi Fukunaga, Julia J. Harris, and Andreas T. Schaefer. Fast odour dynamics are encoded in the olfactory system and guide behaviour.Nature, 593(7860):558– 563, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Revisiting neural scaling laws in language and vision

    Ibrahim M Alabdulmohsin, Behnam Neyshabur, and Xiaohua Zhai. Revisiting neural scaling laws in language and vision. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, editors,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 22300–22312. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Alenezy, Ahmad E

    Ebtsam K. Alenezy, Ahmad E. Kandjani, Mahdokht Shaibani, Adrian Trinchi, Suresh K. Bhargava, Samuel J. Ippolito, and Ylias Sabri. Human breath analysis; clinical application and measurement: An overview.Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 278:117094, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Deep evidential regression.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020

    Alexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, and Daniela Rus. Deep evidential regression.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Andrews, Raluca Pascalau, Alexandra Horowitz, Gillian M

    Erica F. Andrews, Raluca Pascalau, Alexandra Horowitz, Gillian M. Lawrence, and Philippa J. Johnson. Extensive connections of the canine olfactory pathway revealed by tractography and dissection.Journal of Neuroscience, 42(33):6392–6407, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Automotive cabin odors, n.d

    Aryballe. Automotive cabin odors, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  7. [7]

    Digital olfaction & fermentation: What you need to know, n.d

    Aryballe. Digital olfaction & fermentation: What you need to know, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05- 23

    2025

  8. [8]

    Emergent social conventions and collective bias in llm populations.Science Advances, 11(20):eadu9368, 2025

    Ariel Flint Ashery, Luca Maria Aiello, and Andrea Baronchelli. Emergent social conventions and collective bias in llm populations.Science Advances, 11(20):eadu9368, 2025

    2025

Show all 170 references
  1. [9]

    Pmp 2001 - database of perfumery materials and performance

    Leffingwell & Associates. Pmp 2001 - database of perfumery materials and performance. http://www.leffingwell.com/bacispmp.htm. Accessed: 2025-03-08

    2001

  2. [10]

    Bionic hand motion control method based on imitation of human hand movements and reinforcement learning

    Jibo Bai, Baojiang Li, Xichao Wang, Haiyan Wang, and Yuting Guo. Bionic hand motion control method based on imitation of human hand movements and reinforcement learning. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 21(2):764–777, Mar 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    E.co.tech breathalyzer: A pilot study of a non-invasive covid-19 diagnostic tool for light and non-smokers.ACS Measurement Science Au, 4(5):496–503, Oct 2024

    Ivneet Banga, Kordel France, Anirban Paul, and Shalini Prasad. E.co.tech breathalyzer: A pilot study of a non-invasive covid-19 diagnostic tool for light and non-smokers.ACS Measurement Science Au, 4(5):496–503, Oct 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    E.co.tech-electrochemical handheld breathalyzer covid sensing technology

    Ivneet Banga, Anirban Paul, Kordel France, Ben Micklich, Bret Cardwell, Craig Micklich, and Shalini Prasad. E.co.tech-electrochemical handheld breathalyzer covid sensing technology. Scientific Reports, 12(1):4370, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Abdel-Haleem, and Mikhael Bechelany

    Ahmed Barhoum, Selma Hamimed, Hamda Slimi, Amina Othmani, Fatehy M. Abdel-Haleem, and Mikhael Bechelany. Modern designs of electrochemical sensor platforms for environmental analyses: Principles, nanofabrication opportunities, and challenges.Trends in Environmental Analytical ...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Olfaction is a spatial sense.Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Jan 2025

    Ann-Sophie Barwich. Olfaction is a spatial sense.Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Jan 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 610–623, 2021

    Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 610–623, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Billesbølle, Claire A

    Christian B. Billesbølle, Claire A. de March, Wijnand J. C. van der Velden, Ning Ma, Jeevan Tewari, Claudia Llinas del Torrent, Linus Li, Bryan Faust, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Hiroaki Mat- sunami, and Aashish Manglik. Structural basis of odorant recognition by a human odorant recept...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Implausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(21):E2766–E2774, May 2015

    Eric Block, Seogjoo Jang, Hiroaki Matsunami, Sivakumar Sekharan, Bérénice Dethier, Mehmed Z Ertem, Sivaji Gundala, Yi Pan, Shengju Li, Zhen Li, Stephene N Lodge, Mehmet Ozbil, Huihong Jiang, Sonia F Penalba, Victor S Batista, and Hanyi Zhuang. Implausibility of the vibrational...

    2015

  10. [18]

    Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training

    Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, COLT’ 98, pages 92–100, New York, NY , USA, 1998. Association for Computing Machinery

    1998

  11. [19]

    Atlas, n.d

    Boston Dynamics. Atlas, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  12. [20]

    A. E. Bourgeois and Joanne O. Bourgeois. Theories of olfaction: A review.Revista Interamer- icana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 4(1), Jul. 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Bratman, Cecilia Bembibre, Gretchen C

    Gregory N. Bratman, Cecilia Bembibre, Gretchen C. Daily, Richard L. Doty, Thomas Hum- mel, Lucia F. Jacobs, Peter H. Kahn, Connor Lashus, Asifa Majid, John D. Miller, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Hector Olvera-Alvarez, Valentina Parma, Anne M. Riederer, Nancy Long Sieber, Jonathan Willi...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Could humans recognize odor by phonon assisted tunneling?Physical review letters, 98(3):038101, 2007

    Jennifer C Brookes, Filio Hartoutsiou, AP Horsfield, and AM Stoneham. Could humans recognize odor by phonon assisted tunneling?Physical review letters, 98(3):038101, 2007

    2007

  15. [23]

    Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification.Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (FAT), pages 77–91, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Lilienthal, and Santiago Marco

    Javier Burgués, Victor Hernández, Achim J. Lilienthal, and Santiago Marco. Smelling nano aerial vehicle for gas source localization and mapping.Sensors, 19(3), 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Environmental chemical sensing using small drones: A review.Science of The Total Environment, 748:141172, 2020

    Javier Burgués and Santiago Marco. Environmental chemical sensing using small drones: A review.Science of The Total Environment, 748:141172, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Mapping odorant sensitivities reveals a sparse but structured representation of olfactory chemical space by sensory input to the mouse olfactory bulb.eLife, 11:e80470, July 2022

    Shawn D Burton, Audrey Brown, Thomas P Eiting, Isaac A Youngstrom, Thomas C Rust, Michael Schmuker, and Matt Wachowiak. Mapping odorant sensitivities reveals a sparse but structured representation of olfactory chemical space by sensory input to the mouse olfactory bulb.eLife, ...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Argus: Visualization of ai-assisted task guidance in ar.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1):1313–1323, 2024

    Sonia Castelo, Joao Rulff, Erin McGowan, Bea Steers, Guande Wu, Shaoyu Chen, Iran Roman, Roque Lopez, Ethan Brewer, Chen Zhao, Jing Qian, Kyunghyun Cho, He He, Qi Sun, Huy V o, Juan Bello, Michael Krone, and Claudio Silva. Argus: Visualization of ai-assisted task guidance in a...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Odor Landscapes in Turbulent Environments.Physical Review X, 4(4):041015, October 2014

    Antonio Celani, Emmanuel Villermaux, and Massimo Vergassola. Odor Landscapes in Turbulent Environments.Physical Review X, 4(4):041015, October 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Iontronic tactile sensory system for plant species and growth-stage classification.Device, 3(3), Mar 2025

    Minqi Chen, Zhongqian Song, Shengjie Liu, Zhenbang Liu, Weiyan Li, Huijun Kong, Cong Li, Yu Bao, Wei Zhang, and Li Niu. Iontronic tactile sensory system for plant species and growth-stage classification.Device, 3(3), Mar 2025. 11

    2025

  22. [30]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion

    Cheng Chi, Siyuan Feng, Yilun Du, Zhenjia Xu, Eric Cousineau, Benjamin Burchfiel, and Shuran Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica

    Wei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos, Tianle Li, Dacheng Li, Hao Zhang, Banghua Zhu, Michael Jordan, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. Chatbot arena: An open platform for evaluating llms by human preference, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    On the measure of intelligence, 2019

    François Chollet. On the measure of intelligence, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    M. A. Z. Chowdhury and M. A. Oehlschlaeger. Artificial intelligence in gas sensing: A review. ACS Sensors, 10(3):1538–1563, Mar 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Clone robotics, n.d

    Clone Robotics. Clone robotics, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  27. [35]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models, 2025

    Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhinav Gupta, and et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models, 2025

    2025

  28. [36]

    The good scents company information system

    The Good Scents Company. The good scents company information system. http://www. thegoodscentscompany.com/. Accessed: 2025-03-08

    2025

  29. [37]

    Canine olfactory thresholds to amyl acetate in a biomedical detection scenario.Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5:345, 2019

    Astrid R Concha, Claire M Guest, Rob Harris, Thomas W Pike, Alexandre Feugier, Helen Zulch, and Daniel S Mills. Canine olfactory thresholds to amyl acetate in a biomedical detection scenario.Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5:345, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Perceptual constancy for an odor is acquired through changes in primary sensory neurons.Science Advances, 10(50):eado9205, December 2024

    Mark Conway, Merve Oncul, Kate Allen, Zongqian Zhang, and Jamie Johnston. Perceptual constancy for an odor is acquired through changes in primary sensory neurons.Science Advances, 10(50):eado9205, December 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    arxiv api

    Cornell University. arxiv api. https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html, 2025. Accessed: 2025-05-16

    2025

  32. [40]

    Covington, Santiago Marco, Krishna C

    James A. Covington, Santiago Marco, Krishna C. Persaud, Susan S. Schiffman, and H. Troy Nagle. Artificial olfaction in the 21st century.IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(11):12969–12990, June 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Smith, Aaron C

    John Crimaldi, Hong Lei, Andreas Schaefer, Michael Schmuker, Brian H. Smith, Aaron C. True, Justus V . Verhagen, and Jonathan D. Victor. Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 50(1):1–6, Feb 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Bundlefusion: Real-time globally consistent 3d reconstruction using on-the-fly surface re- integration.ACM Transactions on Graphics 2017 (TOG), 2017

    Angela Dai, Matthias Nießner, Michael Zollöfer, Shahram Izadi, and Christian Theobalt. Bundlefusion: Real-time globally consistent 3d reconstruction using on-the-fly surface re- integration.ACM Transactions on Graphics 2017 (TOG), 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Tao: A large-scale benchmark for tracking any object

    Achal Dave, Tarasha Khurana, Pavel Tokmakov, Cordelia Schmid, and Deva Ramanan. Tao: A large-scale benchmark for tracking any object. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning, 2025

    DeepSeek-AI. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database. In2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009

    2009

  38. [46]

    Reward shaping in reinforcement learning for robotic hand manipulation.Neurocomputing, 638:130204, 2025

    Zelin Deng, Yunlong Dong, and Xing Liu. Reward shaping in reinforcement learning for robotic hand manipulation.Neurocomputing, 638:130204, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    High-speed odor sensing using miniaturized electronic nose.Science Advances, 10(45):eadp1764, 2024

    Nik Dennler, Damien Drix, Tom PA Warner, Shavika Rastogi, Cecilia Della Casa, Tobias Ackels, Andreas T Schaefer, André van Schaik, and Michael Schmuker. High-speed odor sensing using miniaturized electronic nose.Science Advances, 10(45):eadp1764, 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Drift in a popular metal oxide sensor dataset reveals limitations for gas classification benchmarks

    Nik Dennler, Shavika Rastogi, Jordi Fonollosa, André van Schaik, and Michael Schmuker. Drift in a popular metal oxide sensor dataset reveals limitations for gas classification benchmarks. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 361:131668, 2022. 12

    2022

  41. [49]

    Neuromorphic principles for machine olfaction.Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 5(2):023001, may 2025

    Nik Dennler, Aaron True, André van Schaik, and Michael Schmuker. Neuromorphic principles for machine olfaction.Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 5(2):023001, may 2025

    2025

  42. [50]

    Limitations in odour recognition and generalization in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit.Nature Machine Intelligence, 6:1451–1453, 2024

    Nik Dennler, André van Schaik, and Michael Schmuker. Limitations in odour recognition and generalization in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit.Nature Machine Intelligence, 6:1451–1453, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Electro- chemical framework for dynamic tracking of soil organic matter.Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X, 17:100440, 2024

    Vikram Narayanan Dhamu, Anirban Paul, Sriram Muthukumar, and Shalini Prasad. Electro- chemical framework for dynamic tracking of soil organic matter.Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X, 17:100440, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Inhalation frequency controls reformatting of mitral/tufted cell odor representations in the olfactory bulb.Journal of Neuroscience, 38(9):2189–2206, 2018

    Marta Díaz-Quesada, Isaac A Youngstrom, Yusuke Tsuno, Kyle R Hansen, Michael N Economo, and Matt Wachowiak. Inhalation frequency controls reformatting of mitral/tufted cell odor representations in the olfactory bulb.Journal of Neuroscience, 38(9):2189–2206, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    Smell identification ability: changes with age.Science of Aging Knowledge Environment, 2001(10):cp2, 2001

    Richard L Doty and Vidyul Kamath. Smell identification ability: changes with age.Science of Aging Knowledge Environment, 2001(10):cp2, 2001

    2001

  46. [54]

    Influence of age and age-related diseases on olfactory function.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 435(1):36–49, 1984

    Richard L Doty, Peter Shaman, Steven L Applebaum, Roland Giberson, Lisa Siksorski, and L Rosenberg. Influence of age and age-related diseases on olfactory function.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 435(1):36–49, 1984

    1984

  47. [55]

    Duisterhof, Shushuai Li, Javier Burgués, Vijay Janapa Reddi, and Guido C

    Bardienus P. Duisterhof, Shushuai Li, Javier Burgués, Vijay Janapa Reddi, and Guido C. H. E. de Croon. Sniffy bug: A fully autonomous swarm of gas-seeking nano quadcopters in cluttered environments. In2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IR...

    2021

  48. [56]

    Some aspects of the vibration theory of odor.Perfumery and essential oil record, 19(456-459), 1928

    GM Dyson. Some aspects of the vibration theory of odor.Perfumery and essential oil record, 19(456-459), 1928

    1928

  49. [57]

    Everingham, L

    M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge.International Journal of Computer Vision, 88(2):303–338, June 2010

    2010

  50. [58]

    Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activities.Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    Fadime Sener, Dibyadip Chatterjee, Daniel Shelepov, Kun He, Dipika Singhania, Robert Wang, and Angela Yao. Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activities.Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Figure ai, n.d

    Figure AI. Figure ai, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  52. [60]

    Doyle, Congli Wang, Alexandra E

    James Fong, Hannah K. Doyle, Congli Wang, Alexandra E. Boehm, Sofie R. Herbeck, Vi- mal Prabhu Pandiyan, Brian P. Schmidt, Pavan Tiruveedhula, John E. Vanston, William S. Tuten, Ramkumar Sabesan, Austin Roorda, and Ren Ng. Novel color via stimulation of individual photorecepto...

    2025

  53. [61]

    Kordel K. France. Scentience. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/scentience/ id6741092923, 2025. Accessed: 2025-03-02

    2025

  54. [62]

    France, Anirban Paul, Ivneet Banga, and Shalini

    Kordel K. France, Anirban Paul, Ivneet Banga, and Shalini. Prasad. Emergent behavior in evolutionary swarms for machine olfaction. InProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO ’24, page 30–38, New York, NY , USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery

    2024

  55. [63]

    France and John W

    Kordel K. France and John W. Sheppard. Factored particle swarm optimization for policy co-training in reinforcement learning. InProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Com- putation Conference, GECCO ’23, page 30–38, New York, NY , USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery

    2023

  56. [64]

    Jones, Amanda Sofie Rios, Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Shixian Wen, Po-Hsuan Huang, Zachary William Murdock, Gozde Sahin, Shuo Ni, Kiran Lekkala, Sumedh Anand Sontakke, and Laurent Itti

    Yunhao Ge, Yuecheng Li, Di Wu, Ao Xu, Adam M. Jones, Amanda Sofie Rios, Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Shixian Wen, Po-Hsuan Huang, Zachary William Murdock, Gozde Sahin, Shuo Ni, Kiran Lekkala, Sumedh Anand Sontakke, and Laurent Itti. Lightweight learner for shared knowledge lifelong...

    2023

  57. [65]

    MIT Press, 2016

    Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville.Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016. http://www.deeplearningbook.org

    2016

  58. [66]

    Design and control of a bipedal robotic character

    Ruben Grandia, Espen Knoop, Michael Hopkins, Georg Wiedebach, Jared Bishop, Steven Pickles, David Müller, and Moritz Bächer. Design and control of a bipedal robotic character. InRobotics: Science and Systems XX, RSS2024. Robotics: Science and Systems Foundation, July 2024

    2024

  59. [67]

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Rohit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, Miguel Martin, Tushar Nagarajan, Ilija Radosavovic, Santhosh Kumar Ramakrishnan, Fiona Ryan, Jayant Sharma, Michael Wray, Mengme...

    2021

  60. [68]

    Agqa 2.0: An updated benchmark for compositional spatio-temporal reasoning, 2022

    Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Ranjay Krishna, and Maneesh Agrawala. Agqa 2.0: An updated benchmark for compositional spatio-temporal reasoning, 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Gutierrez-Osuna

    R. Gutierrez-Osuna. Pattern analysis for machine olfaction: a review.IEEE Sensors Journal, 2(3):189–202, 2002

    2002

  62. [70]

    Learning to walk via deep reinforcement learning

    Tuomas Haarnoja, Sehoon Ha, Aurick Zhou, Jie Tan, George Tucker, and Sergey Levine. Learning to walk via deep reinforcement learning. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, FreiburgimBreisgau, Germany, June 2019

    2019

  63. [71]

    The ethics of olfactory surveil- lance: A nascent area of inquiry.AI & Society, 36:841–850, 2021

    Rosemary Hains, Noah Overman, and Ann-Sophie Barwich. The ethics of olfactory surveil- lance: A nascent area of inquiry.AI & Society, 36:841–850, 2021

    2021

  64. [72]

    Olfactory bulb glomeruli: external tufted cells intrinsically burst at theta frequency and are entrained by patterned olfactory input.Journal of Neuroscience, 24(5):1190–1199, 2004

    Abdallah Hayar, Sergei Karnup, Michael T Shipley, and Matthew Ennis. Olfactory bulb glomeruli: external tufted cells intrinsically burst at theta frequency and are entrained by patterned olfactory input.Journal of Neuroscience, 24(5):1190–1199, 2004

    2004

  65. [73]

    V olatile organic compounds in indoor air: Sampling, determination, sources, health risk, and regulatory insights.Toxics, 13(5), 2025

    Tajana Horvat, Gordana Pehnec, and Ivana Jakovljevi´c. V olatile organic compounds in indoor air: Sampling, determination, sources, health risk, and regulatory insights.Toxics, 13(5), 2025

    2025

  66. [74]

    Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019

    Drew A Hudson and Christopher D Manning. Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019

    2019

  67. [75]

    Nabil Imam and Thomas A. Cleland. Rapid online learning and robust recall in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit.Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(3):181–191, March 2020

    2020

  68. [76]

    J Irga, Gabrielle Mullen, Robert Fleck, Stephen Matheson, Sara

    Peter. J Irga, Gabrielle Mullen, Robert Fleck, Stephen Matheson, Sara. J Wilkinson, and Fraser. R Torpy. V olatile organic compounds emitted by humans indoors– a review on the measurement, test conditions, and analysis techniques.Building and Environment, 255:111442, 2024

    2024

  69. [77]

    Sourdough bread quality: Facts and factors.Foods, 13(13), July 2024

    Md Ahmadul Islam and Shahidul Islam. Sourdough bread quality: Facts and factors.Foods, 13(13), July 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    Sutton, and Martha White

    Khurram Javed, Haseeb Shah, Richard S. Sutton, and Martha White. Scalable real-time recurrent learning using columnar-constructive networks.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(256):1–34, 2023. 14

    2023

  71. [79]

    A landmark- aware visual navigation dataset, 2025

    Faith Johnson, Bryan Bo Cao, Kristin Dana, Shubham Jain, and Ashwin Ashok. A landmark- aware visual navigation dataset, 2025

    2025

  72. [80]

    Efficient analysis of 2-acetyl-1- pyrroline in foods using a novel derivatization strategy and LC-MS/MS.J Agric Food Chem, 67(10):3046–3054, February 2019

    Tobias Jost, Thomas Heymann, and Marcus A Glomb. Efficient analysis of 2-acetyl-1- pyrroline in foods using a novel derivatization strategy and LC-MS/MS.J Agric Food Chem, 67(10):3046–3054, February 2019

    2019

  73. [81]

    John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ron- neberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, Alex Bridgland, Clemens Meyer, Simon A. A. Kohl, Andrew J. Ballard, Andrew Cowie, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Sta...

    2021

  74. [82]

    Breath analysis: A promising tool for disease diagnosis—the role of sensors.Sensors, 22(3), 2022

    Maria Kaloumenou, Evangelos Skotadis, Nefeli Lagopati, Efstathios Efstathopoulos, and Dimitris Tsoukalas. Breath analysis: A promising tool for disease diagnosis—the role of sensors.Sensors, 22(3), 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei

    Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models, 2020

    2020

  76. [84]

    Biased priorities, biased outcomes: Three recom- mendations for ethics-oriented data annotation practices

    Gunay Kazimzade and Milagros Miceli. Biased priorities, biased outcomes: Three recom- mendations for ethics-oriented data annotation practices. InProceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES ’20, page 71, New York, NY , USA, 2020. Association for Com...

    2020

  77. [85]

    V osshall

    Andreas Keller and Leslie B. V osshall. Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules. BMC Neuroscience, 17(1):55, Aug 2016

    2016

  78. [86]

    Artificial olfactory sensor technology that mimics the olfactory mechanism: a comprehensive review.Biomaterials Research, 26(1):40, 2022

    Chuntae Kim, Kyung Kwan Lee, Moon Sung Kang, Dong-Myeong Shin, Jin-Woo Oh, Chang- Soo Lee, and Dong-Wook Han. Artificial olfactory sensor technology that mimics the olfactory mechanism: a comprehensive review.Biomaterials Research, 26(1):40, 2022

    2022

  79. [87]

    Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Graham, F.Q

    Rodney Michael Kinney, Chloe Anastasiades, Russell Authur, Iz Beltagy, Jonathan Bragg, Alexandra Buraczynski, Isabel Cachola, Stefan Candra, Yoganand Chandrasekhar, Arman Cohan, Miles Crawford, Doug Downey, Jason Dunkelberger, Oren Etzioni, Rob Evans, Sergey Feldman, Joseph Go...

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Analyzing dataset annotation quality management in the wild, 2024

    Jan-Christoph Klie, Richard Eckart de Castilho, and Iryna Gurevych. Analyzing dataset annotation quality management in the wild, 2024

    2024

  82. [90]

    Vineyard, Tej Pandit, Cory Merkel, Rajkumar Kubendran, James B

    Dhireesha Kudithipudi, Catherine Schuman, Craig M. Vineyard, Tej Pandit, Cory Merkel, Rajkumar Kubendran, James B. Aimone, Garrick Orchard, Christian Mayr, Ryad Benos- man, Joe Hays, Cliff Young, Chiara Bartolozzi, Amitava Majumdar, Suma George Cardwell, Melika Payvand, Sonia ...

    2025

  83. [91]

    Lee, Emily J

    Brian K. Lee, Emily J. Mayhew, Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling, Jennifer N. Wei, Wesley W. Qian, Kelsie A. Little, Matthew Andres, Britney B. Nguyen, Theresa Moloy, Jacob Yasonik, Jane K. Parker, Richard C. Gerkin, Joel D. Mainland, and Alexander B. Wiltschko. A principal odor map ...

    2023

  84. [92]

    Odor threshold determination of 53 odorant chemicals.Journal of Environmental Conservation Engineering, 3(8):579–585, 1974

    Gregory Leonardos, David Kendall, and Nancy Barnard. Odor threshold determination of 53 odorant chemicals.Journal of Environmental Conservation Engineering, 3(8):579–585, 1974

    1974

  85. [93]

    Olfactory dysfunction in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8:145, 2016

    Cheng Li, Kun Nie, Yan Ma, Mingming Shao, and Guangjun Li. Olfactory dysfunction in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8:145, 2016

    2016

  86. [94]

    Belongie, Lubomir D

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, Lubomir D. Bourdev, Ross B. Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll’a r, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context.CoRR, abs/1405.0312, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey.Machine Intelligence Research, 21(1):104–135, January 2024

    Jiaqi Liu, Guoyang Xie, Jinbao Wang, Shangnian Li, Chengjie Wang, Feng Zheng, and Yaochu Jin. Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey.Machine Intelligence Research, 21(1):104–135, January 2024

    2024

  88. [96]

    Friedrich Longin, Heiner Beck, Hermann Gütler, Wendelin Heilig, Michael Kleinert, Matthias Rapp, Norman Philipp, Alexander Erban, Dominik Brilhaus, Tabea Mettler-Altmann, and Benjamin Stich. Aroma and quality of breads baked from old and modern wheat varieties and their predic...

    2020

  89. [97]

    Self-paced multi-view co-training.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(57):1–38, 2020

    Fan Ma, Deyu Meng, Xuanyi Dong, and Yi Yang. Self-paced multi-view co-training.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(57):1–38, 2020

    2020

  90. [98]

    Self-paced co-training

    Fan Ma, Deyu Meng, Qi Xie, Zina Li, and Xuanyi Dong. Self-paced co-training. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors,Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2275–

  91. [99]

    Yu, Richard Alexander, Winfried Wiegraebe, and C

    Limei Ma, Qiang Qiu, Stephen Gradwohl, Aaron Scott, Elden Q. Yu, Richard Alexander, Winfried Wiegraebe, and C. Ron Yu. Distributed representation of chemical features and tunotopic organization of glomeruli in the mouse olfactory bulb.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci...

    2012

  92. [100]

    The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire.Nature Neuroscience, 17(1):114–120, 2014

    Joel D Mainland, Andreas Keller, Ying Li, Ting Zhou, Christian Trimmer, Lawrence L Snyder, Angela H Moberly, Kayla A Adipietro, Wei L Liu, Hong Zhuang, et al. The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire.Nature Neuroscience, 17(1):114–...

    2014

  93. [101]

    Malcolm Dyson

    G. Malcolm Dyson. The scientific basis of odour.Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, 57(28):647–651, 1938

    1938

  94. [102]

    Combinatorial receptor codes for odors.Cell, 96(5):713–723, 1999

    Bettina Malnic, Junzo Hirono, Takaaki Sato, and Linda B Buck. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors.Cell, 96(5):713–723, 1999

    1999

  95. [103]

    Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data

    Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. In Aarti Singh and Jerry Zhu, editors,Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence an...

    2017

  96. [104]

    Do rodents smell with sound?Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 167:105908, September 2024

    Eduardo Mercado, 3rd and Jessica Zhuo. Do rodents smell with sound?Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 167:105908, September 2024

    2024

  97. [105]

    Deepfake voice synthesis: A threat to privacy, security, and trust in voice communication.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 39(1):99–106, 2022

    Thorsten Meyer and Mads Christensen. Deepfake voice synthesis: A threat to privacy, security, and trust in voice communication.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 39(1):99–106, 2022. 16

    2022

  98. [106]

    Abdul Momin, Masaya Toda, Zhuqing Wang, Mai Yamazaki, Krzysztof Moorthi, Yasuaki Kawaguchi, and Takahito Ono

    Md. Abdul Momin, Masaya Toda, Zhuqing Wang, Mai Yamazaki, Krzysztof Moorthi, Yasuaki Kawaguchi, and Takahito Ono. Investigation towards nanomechanical sensor array for real- time detection of complex gases.Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 11(1):53, Mar 2025

    2025

  99. [107]

    Door 2.0-comprehensive mapping of drosophila melanogaster odorant responses.Scientific reports, 6(1):21841, 2016

    Daniel Münch and C Giovanni Galizia. Door 2.0-comprehensive mapping of drosophila melanogaster odorant responses.Scientific reports, 6(1):21841, 2016

    2016

  100. [108]

    Giovanni Galizia

    Daniel Münch and C. Giovanni Galizia. DoOR 2.0 - Comprehensive Mapping of Drosophila melanogaster Odorant Responses.Scientific Reports, 6(1):21841, February 2016

    2016

  101. [109]

    Nakamoto.Digital Technologies in Olfaction

    K. Nakamoto.Digital Technologies in Olfaction. Elsevier, 2023

    2023

  102. [110]

    Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory and other chemosen- sory receptor genes in vertebrates.Journal of human genetics, 51(6):505–517, 2006

    Yoshihito Niimura and Masatoshi Nei. Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory and other chemosen- sory receptor genes in vertebrates.Journal of human genetics, 51(6):505–517, 2006

    2006

  103. [111]

    Generation by osmo, n.d

    Osmo AI. Generation by osmo, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  104. [112]

    Osmo ai, n.d

    Osmo AI. Osmo ai, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  105. [113]

    Captaincook4d: A dataset for understanding errors in procedural activities

    Rohith Peddi, Shivvrat Arya, Bharath Challa, Likhitha Pallapothula, Akshay Vyas, Bhavya Gouripeddi, Qifan Zhang, Jikai Wang, Vasundhara Komaragiri, Eric Ragan, Nicholas Ruozzi, Yu Xiang, and Vibhav Gogate. Captaincook4d: A dataset for understanding errors in procedural activit...

    2024

  106. [114]

    Towards unbiased and robust spatio-temporal scene graph generation and anticipation, 2024

    Rohith Peddi, Saurabh, Ayush Abhay Shrivastava, Parag Singla, and Vibhav Gogate. Towards unbiased and robust spatio-temporal scene graph generation and anticipation, 2024

    2024

  107. [115]

    Towards scene graph anticipation

    Rohith Peddi, Saksham Singh, Saurabh, Parag Singla, and Vibhav Gogate. Towards scene graph anticipation. In Aleš Leonardis, Elisa Ricci, Stefan Roth, Olga Russakovsky, Torsten Sattler, and Gül Varol, editors,Computer Vision – ECCV 2024, pages 159–175, Cham, 2025. Springer Natu...

    2024

  108. [116]

    Karol J. Piczak. ESC: Dataset for Environmental Sound Classification. InProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia, pages 1015–1018. ACM Press

  109. [117]

    Tianfei Qi, Ruonan Jia, Linbo Zhang, Guanyu Li, Xuefeng Wei, Jianting Ye, Ruilian Qi, and Haiyuan Chen. Real-time and visual monitoring coating damage and metal corrosion based on the multiple chromatic transition of tmb triggered by highly active n-cds/fe3o4 peroxidase mimics...

    2024

  110. [118]

    Metabolic activity organizes olfactory representations.eLife, 12:e82502, may 2023

    Wesley W Qian, Jennifer N Wei, Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling, Brian K Lee, Yunan Luo, Marnix Vlot, Koen Dechering, Jian Peng, Richard C Gerkin, and Alexander B Wiltschko. Metabolic activity organizes olfactory representations.eLife, 12:e82502, may 2023

    2023

  111. [119]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision, 2022

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision, 2022

    2022

  112. [120]

    Real-world humanoid locomotion with reinforcement learning.Science Robotics, 9(89):eadi9579, 2024

    Ilija Radosavovic, Tete Xiao, Bike Zhang, Trevor Darrell, Jitendra Malik, and Koushil Sreenath. Real-world humanoid locomotion with reinforcement learning.Science Robotics, 9(89):eadi9579, 2024

    2024

  113. [121]

    Low-power neuromorphic hardware for signal processing applications: A review of architectural and system-level design approaches.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(6):97–110, 2019

    Bipin Rajendran, Abu Sebastian, Michael Schmuker, Narayan Srinivasa, and Evangelos Eleftheriou. Low-power neuromorphic hardware for signal processing applications: A review of architectural and system-level design approaches.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(6):97–110, 2019

    2019

  114. [122]

    Low-power neuromorphic hardware for signal processing applications: A review of architectural and system-level design approaches.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(6):97–110, 2019

    Bipin Rajendran, Abu Sebastian, Michael Schmuker, Narayan Srinivasa, and Evangelos Eleftheriou. Low-power neuromorphic hardware for signal processing applications: A review of architectural and system-level design approaches.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(6):97–110, 2019. 17

    2019

  115. [123]

    Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Joy Buolamwini, Solon Barocas, Matt Krishnan, and Julian Lemos. Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial ai products.Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages...

    2020

  116. [124]

    Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text, 2016

    Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text, 2016

    2016

  117. [125]

    The neuromorphic analog electronic nose.ArXiv, abs/2410.16677, 2024

    Shavika Rastogi, Nik Dennler, Michael Schmuker, and André van Schaik. The neuromorphic analog electronic nose.ArXiv, abs/2410.16677, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Benjamin Rheault, Shivvrat Arya, Akshay Vyas, Jikai Wang, Rohith Peddi, Brett Bendall, Vibhav Gogate, Nicholas Ruozzi, Yu Xiang, and Eric D. Ragan. Predictive task guidance with artificial intelligence in augmented reality. In2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User...

    2024

  119. [127]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, 2022

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, 2022

    2022

  120. [128]

    The influence of sniffing on airflow and odorant deposition in the canine nasal cavity.Chemical senses, 42(8):683–698, 2017

    Alex D Rygg, Blaire Van Valkenburgh, and Brent A Craven. The influence of sniffing on airflow and odorant deposition in the canine nasal cavity.Chemical senses, 42(8):683–698, 2017

    2017

  121. [129]

    Khaled Saab, Jan Freyberg, Chunjong Park, Tim Strother, Yong Cheng, Wei-Hung Weng, David G. T. Barrett, David Stutz, Nenad Tomasev, Anil Palepu, Valentin Liévin, Yash Sharma, Roma Ruparel, Abdullah Ahmed, Elahe Vedadi, Kimberly Kanada, Cian Hughes, Yun Liu, Geoff Brown, Yang G...

    2025

  122. [130]

    Salamon, C

    J. Salamon, C. Jacoby, and J. P. Bello. A dataset and taxonomy for urban sound research. In22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM-MM’14), pages 1041–1044, Orlando, FL, USA, Nov. 2014

    2014

  123. [131]

    everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work

    Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen Paritosh, and Lora M Aroyo. “everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data cascades in high-stakes ai. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI...

    2021

  124. [132]

    Wei, Brian K

    Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling, Jennifer N. Wei, Brian K. Lee, Richard C. Gerkin, Alán Aspuru- Guzik, and Alexander B. Wiltschko. Machine learning for scent: Learning generalizable perceptual representations of small molecules, 2019

    2019

  125. [133]

    Scentience app: World’s first olfaction-vision language model

    Scentience. Scentience app: World’s first olfaction-vision language model. 2025. Accessed: 2025-03-02

    2025

  126. [134]

    Evidential deep learning to quantify clas- sification uncertainty

    Murat Sensoy, Lance Kaplan, and Melih Kandemir. Evidential deep learning to quantify clas- sification uncertainty. In S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett, editors,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31. Curran...

    2018

  127. [135]

    Why does that molecule smell? December 2022

    Aditi Seshadri, Heta A Gandhi, Geemi P Wellawatte, and Andrew D White. Why does that molecule smell? December 2022

    2022

  128. [136]

    Micelle-stabilized olfactory receptors for a bioelectronic nose detecting butter flavors in real fermented alcoholic beverages.Scientific reports, 10(1):9064, 2020

    Narae Shin, Seung Hwan Lee, Viet Anh Pham Ba, Tai Hyun Park, and Seunghun Hong. Micelle-stabilized olfactory receptors for a bioelectronic nose detecting butter flavors in real fermented alcoholic beverages.Scientific reports, 10(1):9064, 2020

    2020

  129. [137]

    Singh, Floris van Breugel, Rajesh P

    Satpreet H. Singh, Floris van Breugel, Rajesh P. N. Rao, and Bingni W. Brunton. Emergent behaviour and neural dynamics in artificial agents tracking odour plumes.Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(1):58–70, Jan 2023. 18

    2023

  130. [138]

    Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, and Richard S. Zemel. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning, 2017

    2017

  131. [139]

    Stevens.Handbook of experimental psychology

    Stanley S. Stevens.Handbook of experimental psychology. Wiley, 1951

    1951

  132. [140]

    Parts-per-quadrillion level gas molecule detection: Co-lites sensing.Light: Science & Applications, 14(1):180, Apr 2025

    Haiyue Sun, Shunda Qiao, Ying He, Xiaorong Sun, and Yufei Ma. Parts-per-quadrillion level gas molecule detection: Co-lites sensing.Light: Science & Applications, 14(1):180, Apr 2025

    2025

  133. [141]

    Data-centric artificial olfactory system based on the eigengraph.Nature Communications, 15(1):1211, Feb 2024

    Seung-Hyun Sung, Jun Min Suh, Yun Ji Hwang, Ho Won Jang, Jeon Gue Park, and Seong Chan Jun. Data-centric artificial olfactory system based on the eigengraph.Nature Communications, 15(1):1211, Feb 2024

    2024

  134. [142]

    Neurips test of time talk - sequence to sequence learning with neural networks: what a decade

    Ilya Sutskever. Neurips test of time talk - sequence to sequence learning with neural networks: what a decade. YouTube, December 2024. Uploaded by seremot on 2024-12-13, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yvBqasHLZs

    2024

  135. [143]

    Jane Wang, Janice J

    Arvin Tashakori, Zenan Jiang, Amir Servati, Saeid Soltanian, Harishkumar Narayana, Kather- ine Le, Caroline Nakayama, Chieh-ling Yang, Z. Jane Wang, Janice J. Eng, and Peyman Servati. Capturing complex hand movements and object interactions using machine learning-powered stret...

    2024

  136. [144]

    Automotive suitability of air quality gas sensors.Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 170:40–44, 2012

    Thomas Tille. Automotive suitability of air quality gas sensors.Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 170:40–44, 2012. Eurosensors XXIV , 2010

    2012

  137. [145]

    Luca Turin, Simon Gane, Dimitris Georganakis, Klio Maniati, and Efthimios M. C. Skoulakis. Plausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(25):E3154–E3154, 2015

    2015

  138. [146]

    Gas sensor arrays in open sampling settings

    Alexander Vergara. Gas sensor arrays in open sampling settings. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5JP5N

    2013 doi

  139. [147]

    O’Connell, and Elizabeth J

    Matt Wachowiak, Adam Dewan, Thomas Bozza, Tom F. O’Connell, and Elizabeth J. Hong. Re- calibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 45(10):e1872242024, March 2025

    2025

  140. [148]

    Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R. Bowman. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding, 2019

    2019

  141. [149]

    Colornet: An ai-based framework for pork freshness detection using a colorimetric sensor array.Food Chemistry, 471:142794, 2025

    Guangzhi Wang, Yuchen Guo, Yang Yu, Yan Shi, Yuxiang Ying, and Hong Men. Colornet: An ai-based framework for pork freshness detection using a colorimetric sensor array.Food Chemistry, 471:142794, 2025

    2025

  142. [150]

    Language models with image descriptors are strong few-shot video-language learners

    Zhenhailong Wang, Manling Li, Ruochen Xu, Luowei Zhou, Jie Lei, Xudong Lin, Shuohang Wang, Ziyi Yang, Chenguang Zhu, Derek Hoiem, Shih-Fu Chang, Mohit Bansal, and Heng Ji. Language models with image descriptors are strong few-shot video-language learners. In Proceedings of the...

    2022

  143. [151]

    Wei, Carlos Ruiz, Marnix Vlot, Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling, Brian K

    Jennifer N. Wei, Carlos Ruiz, Marnix Vlot, Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling, Brian K. Lee, Luuk Berning, Martijn W. V os, Rob W.M. Henderson, Wesley W. Qian, D. Michael Ando, Kurt M. Groetsch, Richard C. Gerkin, Alexander B. Wiltschko, Jeffrey Riffel, and Koen J. Dechering. A deep l...

    2024

  144. [152]

    Taxonomy of risks posed by foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05300, 2022

    Laura Weidinger, Jonathan Uesato, Maribeth Rauh, Christopher Griffin, John Mellor, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Iason Gabriel, et al. Taxonomy of risks posed by foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05300, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Wellawatte and Philippe Schwaller

    Geemi P. Wellawatte and Philippe Schwaller. Human interpretable structure-property re- lationships in chemistry using explainable machine learning and large language models. Communications Chemistry, 8(1):11, Jan 2025

    2025

  146. [154]

    Genetic variation in human odor perception.Chemical Senses, 45:549– 556, 2020

    Kathleen E Whitlock. Genetic variation in human odor perception.Chemical Senses, 45:549– 556, 2020. 19

    2020

  147. [155]

    Optimus (robot) — wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, n.d

    Wikipedia contributors. Optimus (robot) — wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-23

    2025

  148. [156]

    Detection and discrimination of low-concentration odorants in complex mixtures.Current Biology, 32(1):89–98, 2022

    CJ Woolf, L Ma, S Qian, YB Sirotin, and D Rinberg. Detection and discrimination of low-concentration odorants in complex mixtures.Current Biology, 32(1):89–98, 2022

    2022

  149. [157]

    Grasping trajectory optimization with point clouds, 2024

    Yu Xiang, Sai Haneesh Allu, Rohith Peddi, Tyler Summers, and Vibhav Gogate. Grasping trajectory optimization with point clouds, 2024

    2024

  150. [158]

    Next-qa:next phase of question- answering to explaining temporal actions, 2021

    Junbin Xiao, Xindi Shang, Angela Yao, and Tat-Seng Chua. Next-qa:next phase of question- answering to explaining temporal actions, 2021

    2021

  151. [159]

    Towards large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models, 2025

    Fengli Xu, Qianyue Hao, Zefang Zong, Jingwei Wang, Yunke Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Xiaochong Lan, Jiahui Gong, Tianjian Ouyang, Fanjin Meng, Chenyang Shao, Yuwei Yan, Qinglong Yang, Yiwen Song, Sijian Ren, Xinyuan Hu, Yu Li, Jie Feng, Chen Gao, and Yong Li. Towards large reasoning m...

    2025

  152. [160]

    Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language

    Jun Xu, Tao Mei, Ting Yao, and Yong Rui. Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016

    2016

  153. [161]

    Eugene Yee, R. Chan, P. R. Kosteniuk, G. M. Chandler, C. A. Biltoft, and J. F. Bowers. Measurements of level-crossing statistics of concentration fluctuations in plumes dispersing in the atmospheric surface layer.Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 73(1-2):53–90, 1995

    1995

  154. [162]

    Artificial olfactory memory system based on conductive metal-organic frameworks.Nature Communications, 15(1):8409, Sep 2024

    Xiaomeng Yin, Hao Zhang, Xuezhi Qiao, Xinyuan Zhou, Zhenjie Xue, Xiangyu Chen, Haochen Ye, Cancan Li, Zhe Tang, Kailin Zhang, and Tie Wang. Artificial olfactory memory system based on conductive metal-organic frameworks.Nature Communications, 15(1):8409, Sep 2024

    2024

  155. [163]

    Webb, Shirui Pan, Charu Aggarwal, and Mahsa Salehi

    Zahra Zamanzadeh Darban, Geoffrey I. Webb, Shirui Pan, Charu Aggarwal, and Mahsa Salehi. Deep learning for time series anomaly detection: A survey.ACM Comput. Surv., 57(1), October 2024

    2024

  156. [164]

    Xueying Zhan, Qingzhong Wang, Kuan hao Huang, Haoyi Xiong, Dejing Dou, and Antoni B. Chan. A comparative survey of deep active learning, 2022

    2022

  157. [165]

    The unbearable slowness of being: Why do we live at 10 bits/s?Neuron, 113(2):192–204, Jan 2025

    Jieyu Zheng and Markus Meister. The unbearable slowness of being: Why do we live at 10 bits/s?Neuron, 113(2):192–204, Jan 2025. 20 Supplementary Material A Publication Count To attain a rough order of magnitude of the proportion of research conducted on olfaction compared to o...

    2025

  158. [167]

    olfaction

    ArXivFor papers on ArXiv, we queried according to the ArXiv categories most relevant to each of the four topics. For computer vision papers, we queried all papers within the cs.CVandeess.IVcategories. For natural language processing papers, we queried thecs.CL category. For sp...

  159. [168]

    Semantic ScholarFor research submitted to theSemantic Scholarsite, we perform a similar query strategy as above, except we search over thephysics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, andcomputer sciencecategories for each of the four topics. We recognize that evaluation of only t...

  160. [169]

    These applications create a framework from which other food items can also be analyzed

    demonstrate similar methods with pork freshness. These applications create a framework from which other food items can also be analyzed. Indoor Air Quality MonitoringOlfactory sensors can be deployed in homes, offices, and public buildings to continuously monitor indoor air qu...

  161. [170]

    semantic instability zone

    providing insights into how a patient is responding to treatment. This enables more precise and effective healthcare interventions through non-invasive and cost-effective treatments. Automotive IndustryOlfactory sensors are being investigated in the automotive industry to moni...

  162. [2284]

    PMLR, 06–11 Aug 2017

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.