Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 71 references

Experimental demonstration of generalized quantum fluctuation theorems in the presence of coherence

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Experiment verifies generalized Crooks theorem for coherent quantum channels

desk verdict Clean photonic validation of a generalized quantum fluctuation theorem, but the reverse channel is assumed self-reverse rather than independently realized, making the empirical claim conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00524 v1 pith:36JEAMPN submitted 2025-05-31 quant-ph

Hui Li , Jie Xie , Hyukjoon Kwon , Yixin Zhao , M.S. Kim , Lijian Zhang This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumfluctuationtheoremsCrooksrelationquasi-probabilitydistributionentropyproductioncoherencetime-reversalchannelphotonicexperimentKirkwood-Dirac
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a photonic experiment validating a quantum fluctuation theorem (QFT) that applies to arbitrary noisy quantum channels, not only thermalizing ones. The theorem, proposed in the theory this experiment builds on, says the ratio between the quasi-probability distribution $P_\to(\omega)$ of quantum entropy production in a forward process and the distribution $P_\leftarrow^\theta(-\omega^*)$ of any time-reversal process obeys a generalized Crooks relation, $e^{\omega_R-2i\theta\omega_I}$. The experiment reconstructs these complex-valued quasi-probabilities using generalized two-point measurements on polarization-encoded single photons, for one covariant and one incovariant channel. The key reported finding is that coherence in the channel produces a nonzero imaginary component $\omega_I$ of entropy production, and that the phase factor in the fluctuation theorem correctly tracks it. A sympathetic reading is that this supports the universality of the symmetry between a quantum process and its time reversal, with the classical Crooks relation as the real, coherence-free special case.

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex-valued transition amplitude $T^{\mu\to\nu}_{ij\to kl} = \mathrm{Tr}[\mathcal{N}(\hat\Pi_i\hat\Phi^I_\mu\hat\Pi_j)\hat\Pi_k\hat\Phi^F_\nu\hat\Pi_l]$, a Kirkwood-Dirac-like quasi-probability that tracks transitions among off-diagonal, coherent elements as well as diagonal populations. From it one builds the forward distribution $P_\to(\omega)$ and the reverse distribution, and the ratio identity $e^{\omega_R-2i\theta\omega_I}$ is the QFT. The second pillar is the family of time-reversal channels $\tilde{\mathcal{N}}^\theta(\hat\rho)=\hat U^\dagger_{\hat\gamma}(\theta)\tilde{\mathcal{N}}(\hat U_{\hat\gamma}(\theta)\hat\rho\hat U^\dagger_{\hat\gamma}(\theta))\hat U_{\hat\gamma}(\theta)$ with $\hat U_{\hat\gamma}(\theta)=\hat\gamma^{-i\theta}$, which reduces to Crooks' time reversal at $\theta=0$ and gives multiple distinct reverse channels when the forward channel is incovariant. The experiment's measurement protocol uses generalized measurement sets built from $\hat\Pi_i\hat\Phi^I_\mu/\sqrt{2}$, $\hat\Phi^I_\mu/2$, and $\hat S\hat\Phi^I_\mu/2$ before and after the channel, so the quasi-probability is recovered as a linear combination of the 64 outcome statistics.

What would settle it

Independently engineer the reverse channel $\tilde{\mathcal{N}}^\theta$ for the same incovariant channel using its own Kraus operators $\hat K^{R\theta}_x=\hat\gamma^{1/2+i\theta}\hat K^\dagger_x\hat\gamma^{-1/2-i\theta}$, rather than assuming $\tilde{\mathcal{N}}=\mathcal{N}$, and check whether $\ln|P_\to(\omega)/P_\leftarrow^\theta(-\omega^*)|-\omega_R$ and $\arg[P_\to(\omega)/P_\leftarrow^\theta(-\omega^*)]+2\theta\omega_I$ remain within the quoted error bars for every $\omega$; a systematic deviation would falsify the generalized Crooks relation as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a general quantum channel $\mathcal{N}$ with stationary state $\hat\gamma$, the paper defines complex-valued entropy production $\omega=\omega_R+i\omega_I$ through transition amplitudes between eigenstates of the initial and final states and of $\hat\gamma$. Its central claim, inherited from the theory it tests, is that for every $\theta$-parametrized time-reversal channel $\tilde{\mathcal{N}}^\theta$, the ratio $P_\to(\omega)/P_\leftarrow^\theta(-\omega^*) = e^{\omega_R-2i\theta\omega_I}$ holds, together with the integral form $\langle e^{-\omega_R+2i\theta\omega_I}\rangle=1$. The photonic implementation tests this on a single qubit encoded in photon polarization, using an incovariant channel that transfers coherence between off-diagonal elements (so $\omega_I\neq 0$ and the quasi-probabilities take negative and complex values) and a covariant counterpart that keeps all distributions real. The experimental data match the predicted slopes for the log-magnitude and phase of the ratio, including for $\theta=-\pi/8$ and $-\pi/4$, demonstrating that the phase factor is governed by $-2\theta\omega_I$.

Load-bearing premise

The experiment assumes the implemented optical channels are exactly their own time reverses ($\tilde{\mathcal{N}}=\mathcal{N}$ and $\tilde{\mathcal{N}}_{\mathrm{cov}}=\mathcal{N}_{\mathrm{cov}}$), so the time-reversal quasi-probability for $\theta=0$ is obtained by swapping input and output settings rather than by independently realizing the reverse process; if the calibrated Kraus operators in Eqs. (14)-(15) or the 99.97% and 99.99% process-tomography fidelities are unreliable, the reported agreement would not constitute evidence for the theorem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the relation is correct, the classical Crooks equality emerges as the special case with real $\omega$, and the integral form recovers the second law $\langle\omega\rangle\ge 0$ even when $P_\to(\omega)$ is complex-valued.
  • For incovariant channels, multiple time-reversal partners coexist, and each satisfies the same generalized Crooks relation with the phase set by $\theta$, so the fluctuation theorem is robust to the choice of reverse process.
  • The imaginary part $\omega_I$ of entropy production becomes an experimentally accessible witness of coherence transfer in a quantum channel, observed here at $\omega_I=\pm\ln\frac{1+s}{1-s}\approx\pm 0.2647$.
  • Generalized two-point measurements with 64 outcomes provide a practical recipe for reconstructing entropy-production quasi-probabilities without the projective back action that erases coherence.
  • The demonstrated symmetry constrains how well noisy quantum operations can be reversed, with direct relevance to quantum error correction and recovery-map methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same protocol could be applied to multi-qubit channels or to channels where $\omega_I$ is larger, which would more sharply separate different quasi-probability reconstruction recipes than the small-$s$ single-qubit test presented here.
  • The paper's time-reversal self-symmetry assumption ($\tilde{\mathcal{N}}=\mathcal{N}$) means the backward distribution is inferred, not independently measured; a direct physical implementation of the reverse Kraus operators would make the test fully self-contained. This is my editorial inference, not a claim the paper makes.
  • The link to Kirkwood-Dirac distributions suggests that the negativity or non-reality of $P_\to(\omega)$ could serve as a quantitative non-classicality diagnostic for the channel, an application the paper does not pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper reports an experimental test of the generalized quantum fluctuation theorem (QFT) introduced in Ref. [41], which relates the quasi-probability distribution of forward entropy production P→(ω) to that of a time-reversal process P←θ(−ω*) via P→(ω)/P←θ(−ω*) = e^{ω_R − 2iθω_I}, where ω = ω_R + iω_I is a complex entropy production and θ parameterizes a family of time-reversal channels. Using a photonic polarization qubit, the authors implement a covariant channel N_cov and an incovariant channel N with the same stationary state, reconstruct the quasi-probability distributions by a two-point generalized measurement protocol, and test the Crooks-like relation for θ = 0, −π/8, −π/4, as well as the integral fluctuation theorem. They report high process fidelities (99.97% and 99.99%), small deviations between reconstructed and theoretical quasi-probabilities (within 0.0734 ± 0.0136), and slopes consistent with the predicted values. The paper concludes that the generalized QFT holds for both covariant and incovariant channels, with the imaginary part of entropy production arising from coherence transitions.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a valuable experimental milestone in quantum thermodynamics, demonstrating a fully quantum fluctuation theorem that goes beyond the two-point measurement framework and includes the effect of coherence through complex-valued quasi-probabilities. The experiment is carefully designed, and the reported process fidelities and statistical uncertainties are strong. The use of generalized measurements to reconstruct quasi-probabilities is a methodological contribution. The paper also provides a clear distinction between time-reversal symmetry and covariance, showing that incovariant channels can still be self-reversed. However, as discussed in the major comments, the validation is conditional on the unverified self-reversal assumption for the reverse processes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental demonstration (paragraph beginning 'By utilizing the fact that ...')] The reverse quasi-probability distribution P←(ω) for θ=0 is not measured by independently implementing the time-reversal channel; it is derived from the forward channel under the assumption that \tilde{N}=N and \tilde{N}_{cov}=N_{cov}. This assumption is stated without an experimental test. Since the QFT is a relation between forward and reverse processes, the demonstrated agreement is partly a self-consistency check. Please provide a direct experimental verification of Eq. (18) (e.g., by reconstructing \tilde{N} from the process-tomography data and comparing it with the forward channel), or estimate the systematic error in P←(ω) due to any deviation from self-reversal bounded by the process fidelities. Without this, the claim of 'experimental validation' is overstated.
  2. [Methods, 'Independence of time-reversal symmetry on channel's covariance'] The paper does not explicitly show that the specific Kraus operators in Eqs. (14) and (15) satisfy \tilde{N}=N and \tilde{N}_{cov}=N_{cov}. The authors state this as a fact without calculation. Since this property is load-bearing for the extraction of P←(ω), please include the verification in the main text, Methods, or Supplementary Materials.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Verification of the QFT (Fig. 2C and surrounding text)] The slopes obtained from the experimental data points (ω_R, ln|P→(ω)/P←θ(−ω*)|) are reported as 1.04±0.08, 1.03±0.06, and 0.98±0.07. Please specify how these slopes are fitted and what error bars are used in the fitting procedure.
  2. [Verification of the QFT (Fig. 3E)] The measured phase slope for θ=−π/4 is 1.5±0.6, which has a large relative uncertainty, and the agreement with the theoretical value −2θ = π/2 is therefore weak. The authors should state the statistical significance of this result and whether the uncertainty is dominated by counting statistics or systematics.
  3. [Methods, 'Reconstructing the quasi-probability distribution from generalized measurements'] In Eq. (22), the coefficients involve complex factors such as −(1+i) and −(1−i). It would be helpful to double-check the signs against the definitions of the measurement operators and Eq. (25) to avoid any possible typographical inconsistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the generalized QFT is cited from the authors' prior work, but the experimental quasi-probabilities are independently measured and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central theoretical relation, Eq. (2), is taken from Ref. (41), authored by two of the present authors (H. Kwon and M. S. Kim). This is a self-citation, but it is not circular in the sense defined here: the theorem is a parameter-free mathematical statement whose assumptions do not include the experimental data, and the paper provides an independent experimental test of it. The channel parameters p and s are calibrated from the setup, not fitted to the QFT, and the forward and reverse quasi-probability distributions are obtained from distinct generalized-measurement configurations. In particular, the reverse distribution is not computed from the forward distribution via the QFT; it is measured by changing the input state to rho_F^nu and exchanging the measurement operators, as stated in the section 'Experimental demonstration'. The self-reversal property ~N = N is a designed feature of the chosen channels and is supported by process-tomography fidelities of 99.97% and 99.99%; even though this property is assumed rather than independently realized as a separate reverse device, that affects the strength of the empirical validation but does not make the derivation circular. The measured slopes for both log-magnitude and phase of the ratio agree with the theoretical predictions within experimental error, and no step in the paper reduces the predicted ratio to the measured ratio by construction. Therefore no circular step is present, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experiment introduces no new free theoretical parameters beyond the calibrated channel parameters p and s; the tested QFT is taken from prior theory. The central validation relies on accurate channel and measurement characterization rather than on fitted parameters. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • channel mixing probability p = 0.2864
    Calibrated from the experimental setup; used to define the Kraus operators of N and Ncov and the stationary state γ. Theoretical predictions for quasi-probabilities use this value.
  • channel parameter s = 0.1316
    Calibrated; controls the balance between dephasing and amplitude damping and sets the eigenvalues of γ, giving ωI = ±ln((1+s)/(1-s)) ≈ ±0.2647.
  • initial state probabilities pI_0, pI_1 = 4/5 and 1/5
    Chosen by hand so that the forward quasi-probability P→(ω) is real-valued for both channels; not fitted to make the QFT hold.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The generalized Crooks QFT (Eq. 2) from Ref. 41 is valid for arbitrary quantum channels.
    This is the theorem under test; the paper does not re-derive it but relies on the cited theory.
  • domain assumption The implemented photonic channels are exactly the Kraus channels in Eqs. (14) and (15) with calibrated p and s, including the self-time-reversal property ~N = N.
    Used to compute theoretical quasi-probabilities and to obtain P← from the forward setup in place of an independently implemented reverse channel.
  • domain assumption The generalized measurements {M_m} and {M'_m'} are realized with sufficient fidelity, and the linear inversion coefficients reconstruct the true P→(ω).
    Reconstruction Eqs. (27)-(28) assume ideal measurement operators, complete statistics, and accurate knowledge of the measurement operators.
  • domain assumption The eigenbases of ρ_I and ρ_F used in the measurement operators are known exactly from quantum state tomography.
    The reconstruction and the definition of ω require accurate eigendecompositions of the initial and final states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental demonstration of generalized quantum fluctuation theorems in the presence of coherence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/36JEAMPN

@misc{pith2026250600524,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental demonstration of generalized quantum fluctuation theorems in the presence of coherence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/36JEAMPN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00524}
}
read the original abstract

Fluctuation theorems have elevated the second law of thermodynamics to a statistical realm by establishing a connection between time-forward and time-reversal probabilities, providing invaluable insight into nonequilibrium dynamics. While well established in classical systems, their quantum generalization, incorporating coherence and the diversity of quantum noise, remains open. We report the experimental validation of a quantum fluctuation theorem (QFT) in a photonic system, applicable to general quantum processes with nonclassical characteristics, including quasi-probabilistic descriptions of entropy production and multiple time-reversal processes. Our experiment confirms that the ratio between the quasi-probabilities of the time-forward and any multiple time-reversal processes obeys a generalized Crooks QFT. Moreover, coherence induced by a quantum process leads to the imaginary components of quantum entropy production, governing the phase factor in the QFT. These findings underscore the fundamental symmetry between a general quantum process and its time reversal, providing an elementary toolkit to explore noisy quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00524 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Descriptions of quantum channels N and Ncov in the Bloch sphere (A) and its ex￾perimental setup (B). (A) Descriptions of quantum channels N and Ncov in the Bloch sphere. The incovariant channel N is composed by mixing ρˆ and states R (ˆρ) and D (ˆρ) after passing two processes R and D (see main text for details) ,while the covariant channel Ncov is com￾posed by mixing the input state ρˆ and the stationary state γˆ. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reconstructed quasi-probability distributions. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Verification of the QFT. (A) Verification of integral fluctuation theorems e P −ωR+2iθωI = ωR,ωI P→(ω)e −ωR+2iθωI for −π ≤ θ ≤ π using experimentally reconstructed P→(ω) with ω = ωR + iωI . Blue and orange lines stand for the real part and the imaginary part of the integral, respectively, while the shaded gray represents the error bar. (B) Description of rotated recovery map for the time-reversal process N˜ θ . The … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    H. Kwon, M. S. Kim, Fluctuation theorems for a quantum cha nnel. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031029 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and t he nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721-2726 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [2]

    Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic trajec tory and an integral fluctuation the- orem

    U. Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic trajec tory and an integral fluctuation the- orem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040602 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [3]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy di fferences

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy di fferences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690-2693 (1997)

    work page 1997

  5. [4]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, S. Mukamel, Nonequilibrium fluct uations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665-1702 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [5]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P . H¨ anggi, P . Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fl uctuation relations: Founda- tions and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771-791 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [6]

    Liphardt, S

    J. Liphardt, S. Dumont, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, C. Bustaman te, Equilibrium information from nonequilibrium measurements in an experimental test o f Jarzynski’s equality. Science 296, 1832-1835 (2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [7]

    Collin, F

    D. Collin, F. Ritort, C. Jarzynski, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, C. Bustamante, V erification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding fr ee energies. Nature 437, 231-234 (2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 71 references
  1. [8]

    Blickle, T

    V . Blickle, T. Speck, L. Helden, U. Seifert, C. Bechinger, Thermodynamics of a colloidal particle in a time-dependent nonharmonic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 070603 (2006)

    2006

  2. [9]

    N. C. Harris, Y . Song, C.-H. Kiang, Experimental free ener gy surface reconstruction from single-molecule force spectroscopy using Jarzynski’s equ ality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 068101 (2007). 25

    2007

  3. [10]

    Toyabe, T

    S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyuki, M. Sano, Exper imental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nat. Phys. 6, 988-992 (2010)

    2010

  4. [11]

    Saira, Y

    O.-P . Saira, Y . Y oon, T. Tanttu, M. M¨ ott¨ onen, D. V . Averin, J. P . Pekola, Test of the Jarzynski and Crooks fluctuation relations in an electronic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180601 (2012)

    2012

  5. [12]

    Talkner, E

    P . Talkner, E. Lutz, P . H¨ anggi, Fluctuation theorems: Work is not an observable. Phys. Rev. E 75, 050102 (2007)

    2007

  6. [13]

    G. T. Landi, M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy produ ction: From classical to quantum. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035008 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    Huber, F

    G. Huber, F. Schmidt-Kaler, S. Deffner, E. Lutz, Employi ng trapped cold ions to verify the quantum Jarzynski equality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 070403 (2008)

    2008

  8. [15]

    An, J.-N

    S. An, J.-N. Zhang, M. Um, D. Lv, Y . Lu, J. Zhang, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, K. Kim, Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a t rapped-ion system. Nat. Phys. 11, 193-199 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    Smith, Y

    A. Smith, Y . Lu, S. An, X. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, Z. Gong, H. T. Quan, C. Jarzynski, K. Kim, V erification of the quantum nonequilibrium work relation in the presence of decoherence. New J. Phys. 20, 013008 (2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    T. B. Batalh˜ ao, A. M. Souza, L. Mazzola, R. Auccaise, R. S . Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, J. Goold, G. De Chiara, M. Paternostro, R. M. Serra, Experime ntal reconstruction of work distribution and study of fluctuation relations in a closed q uantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, ...

    2014

  11. [18]

    Cerisola, Y

    F. Cerisola, Y . Margalit, S. Machluf, A. J. Roncaglia, J. P . Paz, R. Folman, Using a quantum work meter to test non-equilibrium fluctuation theorems. Nat. Commun. 8, 1241 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    Zhang, T

    Z. Zhang, T. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Jia, P . Duan, W. Cai, Z. Zhan , Z. Zong, J. Wu, L. Sun, Y . Yin, G. Guo, Experimental demonstration of work fluctuati ons along a shortcut to adia- baticity with a superconducting Xmon qubit. New J. Phys. 20, 085001 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    Solfanelli, A

    A. Solfanelli, A. Santini, M. Campisi, Experimental ver ification of fluctuation relations with a quantum computer. PRX Quantum 2, 030353 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    G. H. Aguilar, T. L. Silva, T. E. Guimar˜ aes, R. S. Piera, L . C. C´ eleri, G. T. Landi, Two- point measurement of entropy production from the outcomes o f a single experiment with correlated photon pairs. Phys. Rev. A 106, L020201 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    Bellini, H

    M. Bellini, H. Kwon, N. Biagi, S. Francesconi, A. Zavatta , M. S. Kim, Demonstrating quan- tum microscopic reversibility using coherent states of lig ht. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170604 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    A. E. Allahverdyan, Nonequilibrium quantum fluctuation s of work. Phys. Rev. E 90, 032137 (2014)

    2014

  17. [24]

    Perarnau-Llobet, E

    M. Perarnau-Llobet, E. B¨ aumer, K. V . Hovhannisyan, M. Huber, A. Acin, No-go theorem for the characterization of work fluctuations in coherent qu antum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 070601 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    K.-D. Wu, Y . Y uan, G.-Y . Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, M. Per arnau-Llobet, Experimen- tally reducing the quantum measurement back action in work d istributions by a collective measurement. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav4944 (2019). 27

    2019

  19. [26]

    Solinas, S

    P . Solinas, S. Gasparinetti, Full distribution of work done on a quantum system for arbitrary initial states. Phys. Rev. E 92, 042150 (2015)

    2015

  20. [27]

    Solinas, M

    P . Solinas, M. Amico, N. Zangh` ı, Measurement of work andheat in the classical and quan- tum regimes. Phys. Rev. A 103, L060202 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    B.-M. Xu, J. Zou, L.-S. Guo, X.-M. Kong, Effects of quantu m coherence on work statistics. Phys. Rev. A 97, 052122 (2018)

    2018

  22. [29]

    C. L. Latune, I. Sinayskiy, F. Petruccione, Negative con tributions to entropy production induced by quantum coherences. Phys. Rev. A 102, 042220 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    J. P . Santos, L. C. C´ eleri, G. T. Landi, M. Paternostro, T he role of quantum coherence in non-equilibrium entropy production. Npj Quantum Inf. 5, 1-7 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    Jevtic, T

    S. Jevtic, T. Rudolph, D. Jennings, Y . Hirono, S. Nakayam a, M. Murao, Exchange fluctua- tion theorem for correlated quantum systems. Phys. Rev. E 92, 042113 (2015)

    2015

  25. [32]

    Micadei, G

    K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, E. Lutz, Quantum fluctuation theo rems beyond two-point mea- surements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 090602 (2020)

    2020

  26. [33]

    ˚Aberg, Fully quantum fluctuation theorems

    J. ˚Aberg, Fully quantum fluctuation theorems. Phys. Rev. X 8, 011019 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    Holmes, S

    Z. Holmes, S. Weidt, D. Jennings, J. Anders, F. Mintert, C oherent fluctuation relations: from the abstract to the concrete. Quantum 3, 124 (2019)

    2019

  28. [35]

    Hatano, S.-I

    T. Hatano, S.-I. Sasa, Steady-state thermodynamics of L angevin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3463-3467 (2001)

    2001

  29. [36]

    Esposito, C

    M. Esposito, C. V an den Broeck, Three detailed fluctuatio n theorems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 090601 (2010). 28

    2010

  30. [37]

    Manzano, J

    G. Manzano, J. M. Horowitz, J. M. R. Parrondo, Quantum fluc tuation theorems for arbitrary environments: Adiabatic and nonadiabatic entropy product ion. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031037 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    Micadei, J

    K. Micadei, J. P . S. Peterson, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, G. T. Landi, R. M. Serra, E. Lutz, Experimental validation of fully quant um fluctuation theorems using dynamic Bayesian networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180603 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    Hern´ andez-G´ omez, S

    S. Hern´ andez-G´ omez, S. Gherardini, A. Belenchia, A. T rombettoni, M. Paternostro, N. Fabbri, Experimental signature of initial quantum coher ence on entropy production. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 86 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    F. L. Rodrigues, E. Lutz, Nonequilibrium thermodynamic s of quantum coherence beyond linear response. Commun. Phys. 7, 61 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    J. G. Kirkwood, Quantum statistics of almost classical a ssemblies. Phys. Rev. 44, 31 (1933)

    1933

  35. [43]

    P . A. M. Dirac, On the analogy between classical and quant um mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 195 (1945)

    1945

  36. [44]

    Lostaglio, Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextual ity, and work quasiprobabilities

    M. Lostaglio, Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextual ity, and work quasiprobabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 040602 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    A. Levy, M. Lostaglio, Quasiprobability distribution f or heat fluctuations in the quantum regime. PRX Quantum 1, 010309 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Zhang, J

    K. Zhang, J. Wang, Quasiprobability fluctuation theorem behind the spread of quantum information. Commun. Phys. 7, 91 (2024). 29

    2024

  39. [47]

    Lostaglio, A

    M. Lostaglio, A. Belenchia, A. Levy, S. Hern´ andez-G´ om ez, N. Fabbri, S. Gherardini, Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability approach to the statisti cs of incompatible observables. Quantum 7, 1128 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Petz, Sufficient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von neumann algebra

    D. Petz, Sufficient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von neumann algebra. Commun. Math. Phys. 105, 123-131 (1986)

    1986

  41. [49]

    Junge, R

    M. Junge, R. Renner, D. Sutter, M. M. Wilde, A. Winter, Uni versal recovery maps and approximate sufficiency of quantum relative entropy. Ann. Henri Poincar ´e 19, 2955-2978 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    M. D. Vidrighin, O. Dahlsten, M. Barbieri, M. S. Kim, V . V edral, I. A. Walmsley, Photonic Maxwell’s demon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 050401 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Mancino, M

    L. Mancino, M. Sbroscia, I. Gianani, E. Roccia, M. Barbie ri, Quantum simulation of single- qubit thermometry using linear optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130502 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Mancino, V

    L. Mancino, V . Cavina, A. De Pasquale, M. Sbroscia, R. I. B ooth, E. Roccia, I. Gianani, V . Giovannetti, M. Barbieri, Geometrical bounds on irrever sibility in open quantum sys- tems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 160602 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    W. Tham, H. Ferretti, A. Sadashivan, A. Steinberg, Simul ating and optimising quantum thermometry using single photons. Sci. Rep. 6, 38822 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    R. M. de Ara´ ujo, T. H¨ affner, R. Bernardi, D. S. Tasca, M. P . J. Lavery, M. J. Padgett, A. Kanaan, L. C. C´ eleri, P . H. S. Ribeiro, Experimental study of quantum thermodynamics using optical vortices. J. Phys. Commun. 2, 035012 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    G. E. Crooks, Quantum operation time reversal. Phys. Rev. A 77, 034101 (2008). 30

    2008

  48. [56]

    L. Hu, X. Mu, W. Cai, Y . Ma, Y . Xu, H. Wang, Y . Song, C.-L. Zou , L. Sun, Experimental repetitive quantum channel simulation. Sci. Bull. 63, 1551-1557 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    H. Lu, C. Liu, D.-S. Wang, L.-K. Chen, Z.-D. Li, X.-C. Y ao, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Z. Peng, B. C. Sanders, Y .-A. Chen, J.-W. Pan, Experimental quantum c hannel simulation. Phys. Rev. A 95, 042310 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    K. Wang, X. Wang, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, J. Li, B. C. Sanders, P . X ue, Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology in a noisy environment. Phys. Rev. A 97, 042112 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    P . Wang, H. Kwon, C.-Y . Luan, W. Chen, M. Qiao, Z. Zhou, K. Wang, M. S. Kim, K. Kim, Snapshotting quantum dynamics at multiple time points. Nat. Commun. 15, 8900 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    J. S. Lundeen, C. Bamber, Procedure for direct measureme nt of general quantum states using weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070402 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    Gherardini, M

    S. Gherardini, M. M. M¨ uller, A. Trombettoni, S. Ruffo, F . Caruso, Reconstructing quan- tum entropy production to probe irreversibility and correl ations. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 035013 (2018)

    2018

  54. [62]

    D. R. Arvidsson-Shukur, W. F. Braasch Jr, S. De Bievre, J. Dressel, A. N. Jordan, C. Lan- grenez, M. Lostaglio, J. S. Lundeen, N. Y . Halpern, Properti es and applications of the Kirkwood-Dirac distribution. New J. Phys. 26, 121201 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Gily´ en, S

    A. Gily´ en, S. Lloyd, I. Marvian, Y . Quek, M. M. Wilde, Qua ntum algorithm for Petz re- covery channels and pretty good measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 220502 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Barnum, E

    H. Barnum, E. Knill, Reversing quantum dynamics with nea r-optimal quantum and classi- cal fidelity. J. Math. Phys. 43, 2097-2106 (2002). 31

    2002

  57. [65]

    J. M. Gertler, B. Baker, J. Li, S. Shirol, J. Koch, C. Wang, Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction. Nature 590, 243-248 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    H. Kwon, R. Mukherjee, M. S. Kim, Reversing Lindblad dyna mics via continuous Petz recovery map. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 020403 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Brand˜ ao, M

    F. Brand˜ ao, M. Horodecki, N. Ng, J. Oppenheim, S. Wehner, The second laws of quantum thermodynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 3275-3279 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    B. P . Lanyon, M. Barbieri, M. P . Almeida, T. Jennewein, T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, G. J. Pryde, J. L. O’brien, A. Gilchrist, A. G. White, Simplifying quantum logic using higher- dimensional hilbert spaces. Nat. Phys. 5, 134-140 (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    Z. Hou, G. Xiang, D. Dong, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, Realizatio n of mutually unbiased bases for a qubit with only one wave plate: theory and experiment. Opt. Express 23, 10018-10031 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    M. G. Paris, The modern tools of quantum mechanics: A tuto rial on quantum states, mea- surements, and operations. Eur . Phys. J. Spec. Top.203, 61-86 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    I. L. Chuang, M. A. Nielsen, Prescription for experiment al determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box. J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455-2467 (1997). Acknowledgements: Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foun dation of China (Grants No. 12347104, No...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.