Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Nilpotent graphs over skew PBW extensions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For compatible 2-primal rings, every skew PBW extension has a nilpotent graph of diameter 2 or 3, with girth matching the base ring's when that graph has a cycle.

desk verdict The main theorems are false: the nilpotent graph of F_2[x] is empty, so the claimed diameter bounds fail, and Z/4Z refutes the girth claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00632 v1 pith:V665EWJ6 submitted 2025-05-31 math.RA

Sebastián Higuera , Armando Reyes This is my paper
classification math.RA MSC 05C1205C2013A9916S1516S3016S3216S3616S38
keywords nilpotentgraphskewPBWextension2-primalring(ΣΔ)-compatiblediametergirthzero-divisornoncommutative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the nilpotent graph of a skew PBW extension, a polynomial-like noncommutative ring A built from a base ring R and finitely many intertwined variables, with edges joining distinct vertices whose product is nilpotent. It claims that when R is (Σ,Δ)-compatible — meaning the endomorphisms and derivations that govern the extension preserve zero and nilpotent products — and 2-primal, meaning the prime radical is exactly the set of nilpotent elements, the diameter of the extension's nilpotent graph is always 2 or 3, and its girth is never smaller than the base ring's girth, with equality whenever the base's graph already contains a cycle. A sharper result pins the diameter to exactly 2 when the base ring has exactly two minimal prime ideals, and the girth to 3 or 4 when the base graph has infinite girth but nonempty vertex set. These bounds generalize the skew polynomial ring case to a broad class that includes diffusion algebras, ambiskew polynomial rings, and skew bi-quadratic algebras. If the results are right, the nilpotent structure of these extensions is largely controlled by the base ring.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nilpotent graph Γ_N(R), whose vertices are the non-zero nil-zero-divisors of R — elements that multiply some non-zero element into the nilradical — and whose edges join distinct vertices with nilpotent product. The transfer machinery is the skew PBW extension A = σ(R)⟨x1,...,xn⟩ together with (Σ,Δ)-compatibility, a pair of conditions saying that vanishing and nilpotence of products are preserved under the endomorphisms and derivations that govern the extension. The load-bearing result is Corollary 2.10: under compatibility and the NI property, nil(A) = nil(R)⟨x1,...,xn⟩, so the nilpotent graph of A is built from coefficient-wise nilpotence in R. The 2-primal hypothesis P(R) = nil(R) then routes the graph-theoretic conclusions through known facts about zero-divisor graphs and nilpotent graphs of the base ring.

What would settle it

For A = (Z2×Z2)[x], the paper predicts diameter 2 and girth 4 for Γ_N(A); directly computing the zero-divisor graph of the product ring Z2[x]×Z2[x] would settle whether those predicted values are correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claims are Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 3.10: for a (Σ,Δ)-compatible 2-primal ring R and an SPBW extension A = σ(R)⟨x1,...,xn⟩, one has 2 ≤ diam(Γ_N(A)) ≤ 3, and gr(Γ_N(R)) ≥ gr(Γ_N(A)), with equality whenever Γ_N(R) contains a cycle. Theorem 3.3 sharpens the diameter to exactly 2 when R has exactly two minimal prime ideals, and Theorem 3.12 gives the girth as 3 or 4 when the base nilpotent graph has infinite girth but nonempty vertex set. The proof transfers nilpotence between R and A through the characterization that a polynomial in A is nilpotent exactly when all its coefficients are nilpotent in R.

Load-bearing premise

The lower bound 2 in Theorem 3.5 assumes that passing from a ring to a skew PBW extension cannot shorten distances in the nilpotent graph, even though subgraph containment alone does not guarantee that.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every (Σ,Δ)-compatible 2-primal base ring has all its skew PBW extensions with nilpotent graph diameter in {2,3}: nilpotent elements are never more than three adjacency steps apart, and the graph is never complete.
  • Girth cannot shrink when passing to a skew PBW extension: if the base nilpotent graph contains a cycle, the extension has exactly the same girth as the base.
  • When the base ring has exactly two minimal prime ideals, the nilpotent graph diameter of every such extension is exactly 2.
  • When the base nilpotent graph is acyclic but nonempty, the extension's nilpotent graph has girth 3 if the base has exactly one non-zero nilpotent element, and girth 4 if the base is reduced.
  • The bounds apply to families not previously handled by skew-polynomial-ring results: 3-dimensional skew polynomial algebras, diffusion algebras, ambiskew polynomial rings, and skew bi-quadratic algebras.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the diameter lower bound in Theorem 3.5 rests on a subgraph-distance step that is not generally valid, an explicit computation of diam(Γ_N(R)) and diam(Γ_N(A)) for a small SPBW extension would test whether the bound needs a different proof.
  • The transfer in Corollary 2.10 likely extends the girth results to weak (Σ,Δ)-compatible NI rings, the case the authors list as future work; that would make the same statements valid under weaker hypotheses.
  • The dichotomy between diameter 2 and diameter 3 may encode finer information about the minimal-prime spectrum of the base ring than the paper exploits; for instance, rings with exactly two minimal primes always realize the lower value.
  • For concrete algebras such as ambiskew polynomial rings, these bounds translate into explicit short chains among nilpotent elements, which could be checked by direct Gröbner-basis or representation computations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nilpotent graph Γ_N(A) of skew PBW extensions A = σ(R)⟨x1,...,xn⟩ over 2-primal (Σ,Δ)-compatible rings R. It claims three main results: a diameter bound 2 ≤ diam(Γ_N(A)) ≤ 3 (Theorem 3.5), a characterization of the girth for 2-primal rings (Theorem 3.7), and a girth comparison/equality between Γ_N(R) and Γ_N(A) (Theorem 3.10), with applications to several families of noncommutative algebras. The paper is organized as a direct generalization of Nikmehr–Azadi results for skew polynomial rings.

Significance. If correct, the results would provide uniform diameter and girth constraints for a large class of noncommutative algebras, and the examples in Section 4 would be interesting. However, as the counterexamples below show, two of the central theorems are false as stated, and the proofs rely on unsupported monotonicity claims. The contribution is therefore not established. The paper is clearly written and the authors are familiar with the relevant literature; the counterexamples are small and likely repairable by additional hypotheses, but the current statements must be corrected.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 3.5] Theorem 3.5 is false as stated. Take R = F_2 and A = F_2[x], which is an SPBW extension with Σ = {id}, Δ = {0}; R is (Σ,Δ)-compatible and 2-primal. Since A is a domain, Γ_N(A) = Γ(A) has no vertices, so diam(Γ_N(A)) is undefined (or ∞ by convention), not between 2 and 3. The proof asserts 'diam(ΓN(R)) ≤ diam(ΓN(A))' without proof; this monotonicity is not a consequence of Γ_N(R) being a subgraph and is generally false for subgraphs, so the lower bound is unsupported even when the graphs are nonempty. An additional hypothesis such as Z_N^*(A) ≠ ∅, or excluding the reduced-domain case, is needed.
  2. [Theorem 3.7(4)] Theorem 3.7(4) is false: if R = Z/4Z, then R is 2-primal and non-reduced, but Γ_N(R) is the path 1-2-3 and has no cycle, so gr(Γ_N(R)) = ∞, not 3. This directly contradicts the theorem. The proof misreads Proposition 3.2(1), which only states that for an NI ring with a nonzero nilpotent in Z_N(R), the girth is 3 or ∞. The stronger assertion 'gr = 3' is used later in Theorem 3.10 and Theorem 3.12, so those results are also invalidated.
  3. [Theorem 3.10] The girth-invariance theorem relies on the false Theorem 3.7(4) in the non-reduced case: it concludes gr(Γ_N(A)) = 3 from gr(Γ_N(R)) = 3, which need not hold (e.g., R = Z/4Z has gr(Γ_N(R)) = ∞). In the reduced case, the proof that a triangle in A induces a triangle in R via leading coefficients is only sketched; the distinctness of the leading coefficients and the edge conditions need a careful argument (though this part may be repairable). As written, the theorem's equality claim is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2] The vertex set Z_N^*(R) of the nilpotent graph is never defined in the paper; it should be stated explicitly (for example, as the set of nonzero elements x for which there exists y ≠ 0 with xy ∈ nil(R)).
  2. [Theorem 3.5] The statement of Theorem 3.5 should address the case where Γ_N(A) is empty; either exclude it or specify a convention for the diameter of the empty graph.
  3. [Theorem 3.10] The notation 'anσαn(bm)' and 'bmcl' mixes subscripts; use consistent indexing for leading coefficients.
  4. [Section 4] Examples 4.2 and 4.3 invoke Theorem 3.5 for base rings such as k[x1,...,xn] that are domains; for these base rings Γ_N is empty, so the claimed bounds are either vacuous or false depending on convention.
  5. [Theorem 3.5 proof] The phrase 'it can be seen' at the start of the proof of Theorem 3.5 should be replaced by a proof or a reference; as written it hides a load-bearing assertion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the derivation chain rests on independently published theorems with stated assumptions, although Theorem 3.5 appears mathematically incorrect in reduced cases.

full rationale

The paper does not fit parameters, rename known results, or define its objects in terms of its conclusions, so none of the circularity patterns apply. The main imported tool is Proposition 2.9 (Reyes and Suárez [70, Theorem 4.6]), which characterizes nilpotent elements of a skew PBW extension over a weak (Σ,Δ)-compatible NI ring as polynomials with nilpotent coefficients. This is a published theorem whose proof is independent of the present paper's graph-theoretic claims, whose assumptions do not include diameter or girth, and which is externally testable on concrete rings; therefore it is real evidence and does not raise the circularity score. The same holds for the other self-citations used, namely [69, Theorem 3.9] (reducedness of the extension), [50, Proposition 4.4] (minimal prime ideals of the extension), and [69, Proposition 3.8] (compatibility identities); all are prior published results with independent proofs and none is merely a restatement of the target theorem. There is no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors to force a choice, no ansatz smuggled in by citation, and no fitted input later presented as a prediction. The serious weakness of the paper is instead a correctness defect, not a circular one: in the proof of Theorem 3.5, the claim "it can be seen that diam(Γ_N(R))≤diam(Γ_N(A))" is asserted without proof, and it is not a consequence of Γ_N(R) being a subgraph of Γ_N(A). Indeed, for R = F_2 and A = F_2[x], the hypotheses of Theorem 3.5 hold but Γ_N(A) is empty, so the asserted bound 2 ≤ diam(Γ_N(A)) ≤ 3 cannot hold. That is a genuine mathematical error in the paper, but it is not a circularity because the theorem is not being assumed in its own proof and no derived quantity is being fed back as an input. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. All structural facts about SPBW extensions are imported from previously published papers, several co-authored by the present authors; these are not machine-checked but are published. The graph-theoretic conclusions are derived from these black boxes plus elementary graph theory, so the ledger is short but depends heavily on the authors' own prior work.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Weak (Σ,Δ)-compatibility plus NI gives nil(A) = nil(R)⟨x1,...,x_n⟩, i.e., a polynomial is nilpotent iff all coefficients are nilpotent (Corollary 2.10, from [70, Theorem 4.6]).
    This is the bridge that lets the proofs relate nilpotent graphs of R and A. It is imported from prior work by the authors and is not re-proven here.
  • domain assumption If R is (Σ,Δ)-compatible, then ab=0 implies aσθ(b)=σθ(a)b=0 and σθ(a)δβ(b)=δβ(a)σθ(b)=0 (Proposition 2.7, from [69, Proposition 3.8]).
    Used in Lemma 3.9 and Theorem 3.10 to construct cycles in Γ_N(A) from zero products in R.
  • domain assumption If R is reduced and (Σ,Δ)-compatible, then the SPBW extension A is reduced ([69, Theorem 3.9]).
    This makes Γ_N(A)=Γ(A) in the reduced case, allowing use of zero-divisor graph results.
  • domain assumption If R has exactly two minimal primes and is 2-primal compatible, then PA and P'A are the only minimal primes of A ([50, Proposition 4.4]).
    Needed in Theorem 3.3 to determine zero-divisors of A as the union of two primes.
  • standard math The zero-divisor graph of a reduced SPBW extension with exactly two minimal primes has diameter at most 2 ([1, Theorem 3.9(3)]).
    External published result by Abdi and Talebi, used at the end of Theorem 3.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nilpotent graphs over skew PBW extensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V665EWJ6

@misc{pith2026250600632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nilpotent graphs over skew PBW extensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V665EWJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00632}
}
abstract

We investigate the diameter and girth of the nilpotent graph for skew PBW extensions over $2$-primal rings, generalizing similar results on skew polynomial rings. Under certain compatibility conditions, we establish bounds for the diameter of the nilpotent graph and prove invariance of the girth under polynomial extensions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Abdi, Y. Talebi, On the diameter of the zero-divisor graph over skew PBW extensions,J. Algebra Appl. 23(05) (2024) p. 2450089. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498824500890

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219498824500890 2024

  2. [3]

    D. D. Anderson, M. Naseer, Beck’s coloring of a commutative ring,J. Algebra159(2) (1993) 500–514. DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1993.1171

    arXiv 1993

  3. [4]

    D. F. Anderson, P. S. Livingston, The zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring,J. Algebra217(2) (1999) 434–447. DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1998.7840

    arXiv 1999

  4. [5]

    D. F. Anderson, S. B. Mulay, On the diameter and girth of a zero-divisor graph,J. Pure Appl. Algebra 210(2) (2007) 543–550. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.10.007

    doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.10.007 2007

  5. [6]

    S. A. Annin, Associated and Attached Primes Over Noncommutative Rings, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [7]

    S. A. Annin, Associated Primes Over Skew Polynomial Rings,Comm. Algebra 30(5) (2002) 2511–2528. DOI: 10.1081/AGB-120003481

    work page doi:10.1081/agb-120003481 2002

  7. [8]

    S. A. Annin, Associated primes over Ore extension rings,J. Algebra Appl.3(2) (2004) 193–205. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498804000782

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219498804000782 2004

  8. [9]

    Axtell, J

    M. Axtell, J. Coykendall and J. Stickles, Zero-Divisor Graphs of Polynomials and Power Series Over Commutative Rings,Comm. Algebra 33(6) (2005) 2043–2050. DOI: 10.1081/AGB-200063357

    work page doi:10.1081/agb-200063357 2005

Show all 73 references
  1. [10]

    D. D. Anderson, V. Camillo, Semigroups and rings whose zero products commute,Comm. Algebra27(6) (1999) 2847–2852. DOI: 10.1080/00927879908826596

    1999 doi

  2. [11]

    V. V. Bavula, Description of bi-quadratic algebras on 3 generators with PBW basis,J. Algebra 631(1) (2023) 695–730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.05.013. NILPOTENT GRAPHS OVER SKEW PBW EXTENSIONS 13

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    Beck, Coloring of commutative rings, J

    I. Beck, Coloring of commutative rings, J. Algebra 116(1) (1988) 208–226. DOI: 10.1016/0021- 8693(88)90202-5

    1988 doi

  4. [13]

    H. E. Bell, Duo rings: Some applications to commutativity theorems,Canad. Math. Bull. 11(3) (1968) 375–380. DOI: 10.4153/CMB-1968-042-0

    1968 doi

  5. [14]

    H. E. Bell, Near-rings in which each element is a power of itself,Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.2(3) (1970) 363–368. DOI: 10.1017/S0004972700042052

    1970 doi

  6. [15]

    A. D. Bell, K. R. Goodearl, Uniform rank over differential operator rings and Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt extensions, Pacific J. Math.131(11) (1988) 13–37. DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1988.131.13

    1988 doi

  7. [16]

    A. D. Bell, S. P. Smith, Some 3-dimensional skew polynomial rings, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, preprint (1990)

    1990

  8. [17]

    G. F. Birkenmeier, H. E. Heatherly and E. K. Lee, Completely prime ideals and associated radicals, Ring Theory-Proceedings Of The Biennial Ohio State-denison Conference 1992. World Scientific (1993) 102–129. DOI: 10.1142/9789814535816

    1993 doi

  9. [18]

    Chen, A kind of graph structure of rings,Algebra Colloq

    P. Chen, A kind of graph structure of rings,Algebra Colloq. 10(2) (2003) 229–238

    2003

  10. [19]

    P. M. Cohn, Free Rings and Their Relations,Second Edition, Academic Press, London(1985)

    1985

  11. [20]

    P. M. Cohn, Reversible rings, Bull. London Math. Soc. 31(6) (1999) 641–648. DOI: 10.1112/S0024609399006116

    1999 doi

  12. [21]

    Fajardo, C

    W. Fajardo, C. Gallego, O. Lezama, A. Reyes, H. Suárez and H. Venegas, Skew PBW Extensions: Ring and Module-theoretic Properties, Matrix and Gröbner Methods, and Applications,Algebra and Applications, Springer, Cham, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53378-6

    2020 doi

  13. [22]

    Gallego, O

    C. Gallego, O. Lezama, Gröbner bases for ideals ofσ-PBW extensions,Comm. Algebra39(1) (2011) 50–75. DOI: 10.1080/00927870903431209

    2011 doi

  14. [23]

    A.V.Golovashkin, V.M.Maximov, Onalgebrasofskewpolynomialsgeneratedbyquadratichomogeneous relations, J. Math. Sci.129(2) (2005) 3757–3771. DOI: 10.1007/s10958-005-0311-z

    2005 doi

  15. [24]

    J. M. Habeb, A note on zero commutative and duo rings,Math. J. Okayama Univ.32(1) (1990) 73–76

    1990

  16. [25]

    Hashemi, M

    E. Hashemi, M. Abdi and A. Alhevaz, On the diameter of the compressed zero-divisor graph,Comm. Algebra 45(11) (2017) 4855–4864. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2017.1284227

    2017

  17. [26]

    Hashemi, M

    E. Hashemi, M. Abdi and A. Alhevaz, On diameter of the zero-divisor and the compressed zero- divisor graphs of skew Laurent polynomial rings,J. Pure Appl. Algebra18(7) (2019) p. 1950126. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498819501263

    2019 doi

  18. [27]

    Hashemi, M

    E. Hashemi, M. Abdi, A. Alhevaz and H. Su, Domination numbers of graphs associated with rings,J. Pure Appl. Algebra19(1) (2020) p. 2050009. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498820500097

    2020 doi

  19. [28]

    Hashemi, R

    E. Hashemi, R. Amirjan and A. Alhevaz, On zero-divisor graphs of skew polynomial rings over non- commutative rings,J. Algebra Appl.16(2) (2017) p. 1750056. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498817500566

    2017 doi

  20. [29]

    Hashemi, K

    E. Hashemi, K. Khalilnezhad and A. Alhevaz,(Σ, ∆)-Compatible Skew PBW Extension Ring,Kyungpook Math. J. 57(3) (2017) 401–417. DOI: 10.5666/KMJ.2017.57.3.401

    2017 doi

  21. [30]

    Hashemi, K

    E. Hashemi, K. Khalilnezhad and A. Alhevaz, Extensions of rings over 2-primal rings,Matematiche 74(1) (2019) 141–162. DOI: 10.4418/2019.74.1.10

    2019 doi

  22. [31]

    Hashemi, A

    E. Hashemi, A. Moussavi, Polynomial extensions of quasi-Baer rings,Acta Math. Hungar.107(3) (2005) 207–224. DOI: 10.1007/s10474-005-0191-1

    2005 doi

  23. [32]

    Higuera, Some remarks about the fusible property of noncommutative polynomial extensions,Master Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (2020)

    S. Higuera, Some remarks about the fusible property of noncommutative polynomial extensions,Master Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (2020)

    2020

  24. [33]

    Higuera, M

    S. Higuera, M. C. Ramírez and A. Reyes, On the Uniform Dimension and the Associated Primes of Skew PBW Extensions,Bull. Braz. Math. Soc.55(45) (2024) 1–24. DOI: 10.1007/s00574-024-00419-2

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    Higuera, A

    S. Higuera, A. Reyes, On weak annihilators and nilpotent associated primes of skew PBW extensions, Comm. Algebra 51(11) (2023) 4839–4861. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2023.2222393

    2023

  26. [35]

    A. P. Isaev, P. N. Pyatov and V. Rittenberg, Diffusion algebras,J. Phys. A34(29) (2001) 5815–5834. DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/34/29/306

    2001 doi

  27. [36]

    D. A. Jordan, Height one prime ideals of certain iterated skew polynomial rings,Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 114(3) (1993) 407–425. DOI: 10.1017/S0305004100071693

    1993 doi

  28. [37]

    D. A. Jordan, Iterated Skew Polynomial Rings and Quantum Groups,J. Algebra156(1) (1993) 194–218. DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1993.1070

    1993

  29. [38]

    D. A. Jordan, Finite-dimensional simple modules over certain iterated skew polynomial rings,J. Pure Appl. Algebra98(1) (1995) 45–55. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(95)90017-9. 14 SEBASTIÁN HIGUERA AND ARMANDO REYES

    1995 doi

  30. [39]

    D. A. Jordan, A Simple Localization of the Quantized Weyl Algebra,J. Algebra 174(1) (1995) 267–281. DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1995.1128

    1995

  31. [40]

    D. A. Jordan, Down-Up Algebras and Ambiskew Polynomial Rings,J. Algebra 228(1) (2000) 311–346. DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1999.8264

    2000

  32. [41]

    N. K. Kim, Y. Lee, Extensions of reversible rings,J. Pure Appl. Algebra185(1-3) (2003) 207–223. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4049(03)00109-9

    2003 doi

  33. [42]

    Krempa, Some examples of reduced rings,Algebra Colloq

    J. Krempa, Some examples of reduced rings,Algebra Colloq. 3(4) (1996) 289–300

    1996

  34. [43]

    R. S. Kulkarni, Irreducible Representations of Witten’s Deformations ofU(sl2), J. Algebra214(1) (1999) 64–91. DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1998.7692

    1999

  35. [44]

    A. S. Kuzmina, Yu. N. Maltsev, On finite rings in which zero-divisor graphs satisfy the Dirac’s condition, Lobachevskii J. Math.36(4) (2015) 375–383. DOI: 10.1134/S1995080215040071

    2015 doi

  36. [45]

    T. K. Kwak, Y. Lee, Reflexive property of rings, Comm. Algebra 40(4) (2012) 1576–1594. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2011.554474

    2012

  37. [46]

    Lambek, On the representation of modules by sheaves of factor modules,Canad

    J. Lambek, On the representation of modules by sheaves of factor modules,Canad. Math. Bull. 14(3) (1971) 359–368. DOI: 10.4153/CMB-1971-065-1

    1971 doi

  38. [47]

    Lezama, J

    O. Lezama, J. P. Acosta, A. Reyes, Prime ideals of skew PBW extensions,Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina 56(2) (2015) 39–55. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1402.2321

    2015 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    Lezama, A

    O. Lezama, A. Reyes, Some Homological Properties of Skew PBW Extensions,Comm. Algebra42(3) (2014) 1200–1230. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2012.735304

    2014

  40. [49]

    A. Li, Q. Li, A Kind of Graph Structure on Non-Reduced Rings,Algebra Colloq. 17(1) (2010) 173–180. DOI: 10.1142/S1005386710000180

    2010 doi

  41. [50]

    Louzari, A

    M. Louzari, A. Reyes, Minimal prime ideals of skew PBW extensions over 2-primal compatible rings, Rev. Colombiana Mat.54(1) (2020) 39–63. DOI: 10.15446/recolma.v54n1.89788

    2020 doi

  42. [51]

    Lucas, The diameter of a zero-divisor graph, J

    T. Lucas, The diameter of a zero-divisor graph, J. Algebra 301(1) (2006) 174–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.01.019

    2006 doi

  43. [52]

    Marks, On 2-primal Ore extensions,Comm

    G. Marks, On 2-primal Ore extensions,Comm. Algebra29(5) (2001) 2113–2123. DOI: 10.1081/AGB- 100002173

    2001 doi

  44. [53]

    Marks, Reversible and symmetric rings, J

    G. Marks, Reversible and symmetric rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 174(3) (2002) 311–318. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4049(02)00070-1

    2002 doi

  45. [54]

    J. C. McConnell, J. C. Robson, Noncommutative Noetherian Rings,Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Amer. Math. Soc. (2001)

    2001

  46. [55]

    L. M. de Narbonne, Anneaux semi-commutatifs et unis riels anneaux dont les id aux principaux sont idempotents, Proceedings of the 106th National Congress of Learned Societies, Perpignan, (1981) 71–73

    1981

  47. [56]

    M. J. Nikmehr, S. Khojasteh, On the nilpotent graph of a ring,Turk. J. Math.37(4) (2013) 553–559. DOI: 10.3906/mat-1112-35

    2013 doi

  48. [57]

    M. J. Nikmehr, A. Azadi, Nilpotent graphs of skew polynomial rings over non-commutative rings,Trans. Comb. 9(1) (2020) 41–48. DOI: 10.22108/TOC.2019.117529.1651

    2020

  49. [58]

    A. Niño, M. C. Ramírez, A. Reyes, Associated prime ideals over skew PBW extensions,Comm. Algebra 48(12) (2020) 5038–5055. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2020.1778012

    2020

  50. [59]

    A. Niño, A. Reyes, Some remarks about minimal prime ideals of skew Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt extensions, Algebra Discrete Math.30(2) (2020) 207–229. DOI:10.12958/adm1307

    2020 doi

  51. [60]

    Ore, Theory of Non-Commutative Polynomials,Ann

    O. Ore, Theory of Non-Commutative Polynomials,Ann. of Math.(2) 34(3) (1933) 480–508. DOI: 10.2307/1968173

    1933 doi

  52. [61]

    Ouyang, J

    L. Ouyang, J. Liu, On weak(α,δ )-compatible rings,Int. J. Algebra5(26) (2011) 1283–1296

    2011

  53. [62]

    Ouyang, G

    L. Ouyang, G. F. Birkenmeier, Weak annihilator over extension rings,Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 35(2) (2012) 345–347

    2012

  54. [63]

    Ouyang, J

    L. Ouyang, J. Liu, Weak associated primes over differential polynomial rings,Rocky Mountain J. Math. 42(5) (2012) 1583–1600. DOI: 10.1216/RMJ-2012-42-5-1583

    2012 doi

  55. [64]

    I. T. Redman, The homogenization of the three dimensional skew polynomial algebras of type I,Comm. Algebra 27(11) (1999) 5587–5602. DOI: 10.1080/00927879908826775

    1999 doi

  56. [65]

    S. P. Redmond, The zero-divisor graph of a non-commutative ring,Int. J. Commut. Rings1(4) (2002) 203–211

    2002

  57. [66]

    Reyes, Skew PBW extensions of Baer, quasi-Baer, p.p

    A. Reyes, Skew PBW extensions of Baer, quasi-Baer, p.p. and p.q.-rings,Rev. Integr. Temas Mat.33(2) (2015) 173–189. DOI: 10.18273/revint.v33n2-2015007. NILPOTENT GRAPHS OVER SKEW PBW EXTENSIONS 15

    2015 doi

  58. [67]

    Reyes, H

    A. Reyes, H. Suárez, Armendariz property for skew PBW extensions and their classical ring of quotients, Rev. Integr. Temas Mat.34(2) (2016) 147–168. DOI: 10.18273/revint.v34n2-2016004

    2016 doi

  59. [68]

    Reyes, H

    A. Reyes, H. Suárez,σ-PBW extensions of skew Armendariz rings,Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr.27(4) (2017) 3197–3224. DOI: 10.1007/s00006-017-0800-4

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    Reyes, H

    A. Reyes, H. Suárez, A notion of compatibility for Armendariz and Baer properties over skew PBW extensions, Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina59(1) (2018) 157–178. DOI: 10.33044/revuma.v59n1a08

    2018 doi

  61. [70]

    Reyes, H

    A. Reyes, H. Suárez, Skew Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt extensions over weak compatible rings,J. Algebra Appl. 19(12) (2020) p. 2050225. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498820502254

    2020 doi

  62. [71]

    Rosenberg, Non-Commutative Algebraic Geometry and Representations of Quantized Algebras

    A. Rosenberg, Non-Commutative Algebraic Geometry and Representations of Quantized Algebras. Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 330, Dordrecht, Springer (1995)

    1995

  63. [72]

    G. Y. Shin, Prime ideals and sheaf representation of a pseudo symmetric ring,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184 (1973) 43–60. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1973-0338058-9

    1973 doi

  64. [73]

    Y. Wang, W. Chen, Minimal Prime Ideals and Units in 2-Primal Ore Extensions,J. Math. Res. Appl. 38(4) (2018) 377–383

    2018

  65. [74]

    E. V. Zhuravlev, A. S. Kuz’mina, Yu. N. Mal’tsev, The Description of Varieties of Rings whose Finite Rings are Uniquely Determined by their Zero-Divisor Graphs,Russ Math. 57(6) (2013) 10–20. DOI: 10.3103/S1066369X13060029. Higuera: Universidad ECCI, Bogotá, D. C., Colombia Ema...

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.