Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning-Driven O-RAN for Automatic Multirobot Reconfiguration

Faisal Ahmed; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Motoharu Matsuura; Myungjin Lee; Shao-Yu Lien; Shih-Chun Lin; Suresh Subramaniam

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 21 references

Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning-Driven O-RAN for Automatic Multirobot Reconfiguration

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Federated deep reinforcement learning over O-RAN gives simulated factory robots 12% more throughput while cutting transmission energy by 28%.

desk verdict A competent FedDRL-plus-O-RAN application paper whose simulation claims lack statistical support and whose per-agent state design raises an unaddressed POMDP issue; deserves a referee but needs revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00822 v1 pith:2O3WXQKW submitted 2025-06-01 cs.NI

Faisal Ahmed , Myungjin Lee , Shao-Yu Lien , Suresh Subramaniam , Motoharu Matsuura , Hiroshi Hasegawa , Shih-Chun Lin This is my paper

classification cs.NI

keywords federateddeepreinforcementlearningO-RANzero-touchnetworksmultirobotsystemsMCSselectiontransmissionpowercontrolsmartfactoriesD3QN

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a zero-touch factory-network platform in which O-RAN control units run federated deep reinforcement learning (FedDRL) to reconfigure each robot's uplink modulation-and-coding scheme and transmit power. The claim is that federating Dueling Double Deep Q-Network (D3QN) agents through FedAvg-style averaging, plus momentum and prioritized replay, lets robots jointly decide these parameters better than if each agent trains alone. The paper reports, at 20 transmitters, a 12% throughput gain, a 32% gain in normalized transmission energy efficiency, and a 28% reduction in average transmission energy consumption relative to independent DRL. A sympathetic reader would care because plugging learning into O-RAN's hierarchical control loops is a concrete route to the 'zero-touch' automation goal for Industry 4.0.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the FedDRL framework: a D3QN, a dueling double deep Q-network that splits Q-values into state-value and action-advantage streams and uses a periodic target network, augmented with prioritized experience replay, momentum gradient descent on both local and global parameters, and FedAvg aggregation of the local models at the non-real-time RIC. The framework's designed role is to convert each transmitter's MCS-and-power choice into one distributed reinforcement-learning problem, with the global reward in Eq. (11) as the shared objective the federated model maximizes.

What would settle it

Run the identical 20-transmitter scenario but include in each agent's state the interference or SINR contribution of neighboring transmitters, or their last actions; if FedDRL's 12% throughput and 28% energy gains over independent DRL disappear or reverse, the reported advantage is an artifact of the incomplete state rather than a robust property of federated D3QN.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that federated training of the D3QN agents, rather than independent local training, is what turns transmitter reconfiguration into a shared optimization problem without centralizing experience. Each robot is an xApp agent observing its own previous SINR, throughput, action, action outcome, and received power; all agents receive the same global reward composed of throughput and transmission energy efficiency. Local gradients are updated with momentum, local models are periodically averaged at the non-real-time RIC, and the updated global model is sent back for the next round. Under the simulated OFDMA factory scenario, this procedure yields the reported gains over independent DRL and random action selection.

Load-bearing premise

The learning pipeline assumes each robot's one-step state, its own previous SINR, throughput, action, outcome, and received power, is enough to make the decision problem Markovian, even though interference from other transmitters is not part of the state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If FedDRL is correct, factory operators can reconfigure uplink parameters through O-RAN software control loops without human retuning of each robot.
Federating D3QN agents with global momentum should converge faster and more stably than independent DRL, because each agent's loss benefits from shared experience.
The reported 28% energy reduction implies battery-powered robots could sustain longer operations under the same traffic, assuming the simulated gains carry over to hardware.
The 12% throughput gain and 32% energy-efficiency gain quantify the value of distributed collaborative learning over per-robot selfish learning in a multiuser interference scenario.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's state space excludes other transmitters' actions and channels; because uplink SINR depends on mutual interference, the MDP may not be Markov, so the reported gains could shrink or vanish in settings where interference dominates. A direct test would augment the state with per-neighbor interference and rerun the comparison.
The single-edge-cloud simulation leaves open whether global aggregation across multiple nRT-RICs would help or hurt when robots hand over between control domains; one can extend the same FedDRL loop to the multi-edge-cloud case.
The global reward is identical for all agents, so the approach implicitly assumes cooperative robots; task diversity or competition could make a shared reward misaligned, suggesting a future extension to individualized rewards under a federated constraint.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Things you should know: this is a straightforward application of well-known FedDRL (D3QN, PER, FedAvg with momentum) to MCS and power selection in a simulated O-RAN smart factory. The new part is the specific hierarchical O-RAN integration and the joint state/action/reward design. It is not a breakthrough, but it is a clean, clearly written architecture plus simulation study.

What it does well: the O-RAN signaling procedure is described in detail (which xApp talks to which RIC over which interface), Algorithm 1 is complete, and the simulation setup is mostly specified. The baselines are at least sensible (independent DRL and random). The chosen metrics match the claims.

Soft spots, in order of severity. First, the headline numbers (12% throughput, 32% efficiency, 28% energy) come from a single simulated scenario with no error bars, no multiple seeds, no confidence intervals. The reader cannot tell whether the gains are robust or an artifact of one run. This is the load-bearing issue. Second, several reward- and algorithm-related parameters are not reported (alpha1, alpha2, tau1..tau3, constant C, momentum attenuation eta), so reproduction is impossible even with code, which is not provided. Third, the state in Eq. (9) contains only the agent's own past SINR, throughput, action, outcome, and received power. In a multiuser OFDMA uplink the SINR depends on other agents' current powers and channels, whose evolution depends on their own unobserved states; the environment per agent is therefore a POMDP, not the MDP implied by D3QN's Bellman update. The shared global reward makes this worse. This does not automatically invalidate the simulation results – independent learners with local observations often work in practice in these simulators – but the paper should acknowledge the partial observability and discuss why the learned policy is still expected to behave. Fourth, the complexity analysis in Eq. (15) is muddled (the sigma/Lambda notation is never cleanly defined). Minor.

The citation pattern is fine; self-citations are relevant, not padding. The paper is honest about deferring real-world validation to future work.

Who it's for: researchers working on O-RAN automation or multi-agent DRL for link adaptation; they will get a useful reference architecture and a plausible baseline point. It deserves a serious referee; I would send it to review, but with the expectation that the authors add repeated-seed statistics, report the missing parameters, and address the POMDP issue – either by expanding the state or by justifying the local-observation approximation. Without those changes the specific numerical gains should not be taken as established.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a zero-touch network platform that integrates a hierarchical O-RAN architecture with federated deep reinforcement learning (FedDRL) for joint MCS selection and transmit power control in multirobot systems. The authors model the problem as a Markov decision process solved by D3QN agents with prioritized experience replay and momentum-based gradient descent, and they federate the local models via FedAvg. Simulation results report a 12% throughput increase, 32% improvement in normalized energy efficiency, and 28% reduction in average energy consumption relative to independent DRL baselines. The paper includes an architecture description, a signaling procedure, problem formulation, the FedDRL algorithm, a complexity analysis, and a simulation study.

Significance. If the reported gains are robust, the paper contributes a plausible integration of federated DRL with O-RAN's hierarchical control plane for industrial multirobot scenarios, an area that is timely and practically relevant. The paper's clear architecture description and the concrete mapping of xApps to transmitter reconfiguration are useful strengths. However, the empirical claims rest on a single simulation setup without statistical validation, and the MDP formulation is questionable in a multi-user interference-limited environment. The measured performance improvements are therefore not yet established. The paper would be strengthened by multiple seeds, full hyperparameter disclosure, and a state formulation that accounts for inter-transmitter interference.

major comments (3)

[§IV-A, Eq. (9) and Eq. (11)] The state in Eq. (9) contains only each transmitter's own previous SINR, throughput, action, action outcome, and received power. In the multiuser OFDMA uplink of §III-A, the SINR at time t depends on the transmit powers and channels of other transmitters sharing the same PRBs, not just on agent n's own action and channel. Because the global reward in Eq. (11) depends on all agents' actions while the state includes none of the other agents' information, the transition P(s'_n | s_n, a_n) is not well-defined; from each agent's perspective the environment is a POMDP. The D3QN Bellman target in Eq. (8) assumes the tuple (s, a, r, s') is generated by a Markov chain, so the Q-learning update is not justified and the learned values may be biased. The paper should either augment the state with an interference summary (e.g., measured interference plus other agents' recent actions) or explicitly reformulate the problem as a Dec-POMDP and discuss the implications for convergence.
[§V-A and §V-B, Tables I and II] The quantitative claims in the abstract and §V-B are based on a single simulation run without error bars, multiple seeds, or confidence intervals. Furthermore, the reward function in Eq. (12) and the momentum update in Eq. (6) depend on parameters α1, α2, τ1, τ2, τ3, C, and η, and none of these values appear in Tables I or II. Without these parameters and without seed-averaged statistics, the reported 12%/32%/28% improvements cannot be reproduced or statistically distinguished from random variation. The authors should report all hyperparameter values and provide means and confidence intervals over at least several random seeds.
[§IV-B, Eq. (15)] The complexity expression in Eq. (15) is internally inconsistent: the left side uses σ while the right side uses Φ, and σ is then defined as 'the function Φ(·)'. The quantity Λ = R/ρ is not clearly defined because ρ is described as the total number of model parameter aggregations occurring within R, but the relation to the FLOPS of forward/backward passes is never derived. As written, the equation is not a meaningful asymptotic bound. The authors should replace it with a step-by-step derivation of the per-layer and per-update costs, with all symbols explicitly defined.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract] The phrase 'multirobot system autonomously operates' should be made plural ('multirobot systems autonomously operate') for grammatical consistency, and similar subject-verb agreement issues appear elsewhere.
[§III-C, Eq. (1)] The expression 'TX_{t=1}' in the maximization statement appears to be a typographical error for the summation symbol; please replace it with the standard summation notation.
[§V-B, Fig. 3(d)] The caption for Fig. 3(d) says 'for different numbers of transmitters,' but the x-axis is labeled 'Methods' and the text only discusses the case with 20 transmitters; please reconcile the caption with the actual plot.
[§V-A] The simulation setup states 'Ne = [12, 20]' without explaining whether this is a range, a set, or two separate configurations; please clarify how the number of transmitters is varied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: the reported FedDRL gains are simulation outputs, not fitted targets; the few self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical comparison. FedDRL is defined by the MDP in Sec. IV-A (state Eq. (9), action Eq. (10), reward Eqs. (11)-(12)) and the FedAvg update in Eqs. (13)-(14); the throughput, energy-efficiency, and energy-consumption numbers in Sec. V-B are measured outcomes of simulating this scheme against IDRL and RA. No parameter is fitted to the reported 12%/32%/28% targets, and no equation defining the algorithm contains those target numbers; thus there is no fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional circularity. The self-citations ([7], [8], [10]) appear in the introduction and related work as background on O-RAN and federated learning; none of the paper's derivation or performance claims depends on an unverified result from those works. The reward function does include throughput and energy efficiency, so the evaluation tracks the training objective, but this is standard RL evaluation, not a reduction of the prediction to its inputs. A separate concern that the per-agent state in Eq. (9) omits other agents' actions and may make the environment non-Markov is a modeling/correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the platform is an assembly of existing O-RAN and RL components. The main unstated inputs are the missing reward weights, the Markov assumption, and the domain-specific channel and deployment assumptions.

free parameters (3)

Reward weights alpha1, alpha2 = Not reported
Weighting factors in Optimization 1 and reward Eq. (12); no values are provided, and they directly shape the learned tradeoff between throughput and energy efficiency.
Penalty weights tau1, tau2, tau3 and constant C = Not reported
Used in reward Eq. (12) for failed actions; unreported, so reproduction requires guessing or contacting the authors.
Momentum attenuation factor eta = Not reported
Appears in the momentum update Eq. (6); no value is listed in the D3QN parameter table.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The MDP defined by state Eq. (9) is Markovian.
The state omits other agents' actions and channel states; D3QN convergence leans on the Markov property (Section IV-A).
domain assumption Channel model from [1] with path-loss exponent 3, shadowing, and small-scale fading represents a smart factory.
Simulation results in Section V-A depend on this channel model.
domain assumption A single edge cloud and one-to-one xApp-to-transmitter mapping captures the target scenario.
Section III-A sets X_e = N_e; Section VI notes that multi-edge-cloud operation is future work.
domain assumption FedAvg aggregation with momentum converges for heterogeneous local D3QN agents.
Algorithm 1 relies on Eq. (13)-(14) to produce a global model that improves local policies; no convergence proof is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning-Driven O-RAN for Automatic Multirobot Reconfiguration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2O3WXQKW

@misc{pith2026250600822,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning-Driven O-RAN for Automatic Multirobot Reconfiguration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2O3WXQKW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00822}
}

read the original abstract

The rapid evolution of Industry 4.0 has led to the emergence of smart factories, where multirobot system autonomously operates to enhance productivity, reduce operational costs, and improve system adaptability. However, maintaining reliable and efficient network operations in these dynamic and complex environments requires advanced automation mechanisms. This study presents a zero-touch network platform that integrates a hierarchical Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) architecture, enabling the seamless incorporation of advanced machine learning algorithms and dynamic management of communication and computational resources, while ensuring uninterrupted connectivity with multirobot system. Leveraging this adaptability, the platform utilizes federated deep reinforcement learning (FedDRL) to enable distributed decision-making across multiple learning agents, facilitating the adaptive parameter reconfiguration of transmitters (i.e., multirobot system) to optimize long-term system throughput and transmission energy efficiency. Simulation results demonstrate that within the proposed O-RAN-enabled zero-touch network platform, FedDRL achieves a 12% increase in system throughput, a 32% improvement in normalized average transmission energy efficiency, and a 28% reduction in average transmission energy consumption compared to baseline methods such as independent DRL.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00822 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Uplink KPIs, measurement reports, and metrics collection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (a) System throughput vs varying number of transmitters; (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

Wireless networked multirobot systems in smart factories,

K.-C. Chen, S.-C. Lin, J.-H. Hsiao, C.-H. Liu, A. F. Molisch, and G. P. Fettweis, “Wireless networked multirobot systems in smart factories,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 468–494, 2021

work page 2021
[2]

Zero touch networks to realize virtualization: Opportunities, challenges, and future prospects,

I. Ashraf, Y . B. Zikria, S. Garg, Y . Park, G. Kaddoum, and S. Singh, “Zero touch networks to realize virtualization: Opportunities, challenges, and future prospects,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 251–259, 2022

work page 2022
[3]

Zero touch man- agement: A survey of network automation solutions for 5g and 6g networks,

E. Coronado, R. Behravesh, T. Subramanya, A. Fern `andez-Fern`andez, M. S. Siddiqui, X. Costa-P ´erez, and R. Riggio, “Zero touch man- agement: A survey of network automation solutions for 5g and 6g networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2535–2578, 2022

work page 2022
[4]

Deep-learning- based weak electromagnetic intrusion detection method for zero touch networks on industrial iot,

T. Wang, J. Li, W. Wei, W. Wang, and K. Fang, “Deep-learning- based weak electromagnetic intrusion detection method for zero touch networks on industrial iot,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, pp. 236–242, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

O-RAN Architecture Description 9.0,

O-RAN Alliance, “O-RAN Architecture Description 9.0,” O-RAN Al- liance, Technical Specification, September 2024

work page 2024
[6]

Ric: A ran intelligent controller platform for ai-enabled cellular networks,

B. Balasubramanian, E. S. Daniels, M. Hiltunen, R. Jana, K. Joshi, R. Sivaraj, T. X. Tran, and C. Wang, “Ric: A ran intelligent controller platform for ai-enabled cellular networks,” IEEE Internet Computing , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 7–17, 2021

work page 2021
[7]

Universal vertical application adaptation for o-ran: Low-latency ric and autonomous intelligent xapp generation,

S.-Y . Lien, Y .-C. Huang, C.-C. Tseng, S.-C. Lin, C.-L. I, X. Xu, and D.-J. Deng, “Universal vertical application adaptation for o-ran: Low-latency ric and autonomous intelligent xapp generation,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 80–86, 2024

work page 2024
[8]

Enhancing network traffic analysis in o-ran enabled next- generation networks through federated multi-task learning,

F. Ahmed, M. Lee, S. Subramaniam, M. Matsuura, H. Hasegawa, and S.-C. Lin, “Enhancing network traffic analysis in o-ran enabled next- generation networks through federated multi-task learning,” in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , Milan, Italy, March 2025

work page 2025

Show all 21 references

[9]

Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentral- ized Data,

B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y. Arcas, “Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentral- ized Data,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics . PMLR, 20–22 Apr 2017, pp. 1273–1282

2017
[10]

Privacy-preserving serverless edge learning with decentralized small-scale mobile data,

S.-C. Lin, C.-H. Lin, and M. Lee, “Privacy-preserving serverless edge learning with decentralized small-scale mobile data,” IEEE Network , vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 264–271, 2024

2024
[11]

Reducing communication overhead of federated learning through clustering analysis,

A. A. Al-Saedi, V . Boeva, and E. Casalicchio, “Reducing communication overhead of federated learning through clustering analysis,” in 2021 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) , 2021, pp. 1–7

2021
[12]

Joint selection of local trainers and resource allocation for federated learning in open ran intelligent controllers,

A. K. Singh and K. Khoa Nguyen, “Joint selection of local trainers and resource allocation for federated learning in open ran intelligent controllers,” in 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2022, pp. 1874–1879

2022
[13]

Federated learning for efficient spectrum allocation in open ran,

M. Asad and S. Otoum, “Federated learning for efficient spectrum allocation in open ran,” Cluster Computing, vol. 27, pp. 11 237–11 247, 2024

2024
[14]

Toward securing federated learning against poisoning attacks in zero touch b5g networks,

S. Ben Saad, B. Brik, and A. Ksentini, “Toward securing federated learning against poisoning attacks in zero touch b5g networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1612–1624, 2023

2023
[15]

A cloud native sla-driven stochastic federated learning policy for 6g zero-touch network slicing,

S. Roy, H. Chergui, L. Sanabria-Russo, and C. Verikoukis, “A cloud native sla-driven stochastic federated learning policy for 6g zero-touch network slicing,” in ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2022, pp. 4269–4274

2022
[16]

Federated meta- learning for traffic steering in o-ran,

H. Erdol, X. Wang, P. Li, J. D. Thomas, R. Piechocki, G. Oikonomou, R. Inacio, A. Ahmad, K. Briggs, and S. Kapoor, “Federated meta- learning for traffic steering in o-ran,” in 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall), 2022, pp. 1–7

2022
[17]

Federated deep reinforce- ment learning for efficient jamming attack mitigation in o-ran,

Z. A. E. Houda, H. Moudoud, and B. Brik, “Federated deep reinforce- ment learning for efficient jamming attack mitigation in o-ran,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 9334–9343, 2024

2024
[18]

Multi-agent reinforcement learning resources allocation method using dueling double deep q-network in vehicular networks,

Y . Ji, Y . Wang, H. Zhao, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, H. Sari, and F. Adachi, “Multi-agent reinforcement learning resources allocation method using dueling double deep q-network in vehicular networks,” IEEE Transac- tions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 13 447–13 460, 2023

2023
[19]

Accelerating federated learn- ing via momentum gradient descent,

W. Liu, L. Chen, Y . Chen, and W. Zhang, “Accelerating federated learn- ing via momentum gradient descent,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1754–1766, 2020

2020
[20]

Prioritized experience replay,

T. Schaul, J. Quan, I. Antonoglou, and D. Silver, “Prioritized experience replay,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05952 , 2015

2015 arXiv
[21]

3GPP, TS 38.214, NR; Physical layer procedures for data , Sep 2023

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Wireless networked multirobot systems in smart factories,

K.-C. Chen, S.-C. Lin, J.-H. Hsiao, C.-H. Liu, A. F. Molisch, and G. P. Fettweis, “Wireless networked multirobot systems in smart factories,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 468–494, 2021

work page 2021

[2] [2]

Zero touch networks to realize virtualization: Opportunities, challenges, and future prospects,

I. Ashraf, Y . B. Zikria, S. Garg, Y . Park, G. Kaddoum, and S. Singh, “Zero touch networks to realize virtualization: Opportunities, challenges, and future prospects,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 251–259, 2022

work page 2022

[3] [3]

Zero touch man- agement: A survey of network automation solutions for 5g and 6g networks,

E. Coronado, R. Behravesh, T. Subramanya, A. Fern `andez-Fern`andez, M. S. Siddiqui, X. Costa-P ´erez, and R. Riggio, “Zero touch man- agement: A survey of network automation solutions for 5g and 6g networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2535–2578, 2022

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Deep-learning- based weak electromagnetic intrusion detection method for zero touch networks on industrial iot,

T. Wang, J. Li, W. Wei, W. Wang, and K. Fang, “Deep-learning- based weak electromagnetic intrusion detection method for zero touch networks on industrial iot,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, pp. 236–242, 2022

work page 2022

[5] [5]

O-RAN Architecture Description 9.0,

O-RAN Alliance, “O-RAN Architecture Description 9.0,” O-RAN Al- liance, Technical Specification, September 2024

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Ric: A ran intelligent controller platform for ai-enabled cellular networks,

B. Balasubramanian, E. S. Daniels, M. Hiltunen, R. Jana, K. Joshi, R. Sivaraj, T. X. Tran, and C. Wang, “Ric: A ran intelligent controller platform for ai-enabled cellular networks,” IEEE Internet Computing , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 7–17, 2021

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Universal vertical application adaptation for o-ran: Low-latency ric and autonomous intelligent xapp generation,

S.-Y . Lien, Y .-C. Huang, C.-C. Tseng, S.-C. Lin, C.-L. I, X. Xu, and D.-J. Deng, “Universal vertical application adaptation for o-ran: Low-latency ric and autonomous intelligent xapp generation,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 80–86, 2024

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Enhancing network traffic analysis in o-ran enabled next- generation networks through federated multi-task learning,

F. Ahmed, M. Lee, S. Subramaniam, M. Matsuura, H. Hasegawa, and S.-C. Lin, “Enhancing network traffic analysis in o-ran enabled next- generation networks through federated multi-task learning,” in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , Milan, Italy, March 2025

work page 2025