Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Image-based measurements of Tafel slopes in aqueous MV/4-HO-TEMPO Flow Batteries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a calibration-free, image-based method for measuring Tafel slopes and charge-transfer and charge-transport resistances directly in an operating MV/4-HO-TEMPO redox flow battery, finding Tafel slopes of 34 ± 2 mV and 38…

desk verdict Clever calibration-free imaging method, but the overpotential assumption linking cell voltage to a single electrode is unproven and likely wrong, so the reported Tafel slopes are questionable. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01264 v2 pith:VM7JX356 submitted 2025-06-02 physics.chem-ph

Stéphane Chevalier , Yui Sasaki , Tsuyoshi Minami This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords redoxflowbatteryspectroelectrochemistryimagingmicrofluidicEISTafelslopemethylviologen4-HO-TEMPO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a calibration-free, image-based way to measure Tafel kinetics and charge-transfer and charge-transport resistances directly in an operating redox flow battery, without a reference electrode or molar-absorptivity calibration. The demonstration is a membrane-free microfluidic cell running the methyl viologen / 4-HO-TEMPO couple in charging mode, where a low-frequency voltage modulation creates a measurable periodic absorbance change in both reactants. An analytical model of the modulated advection-reaction transport links the ratio of modulated to steady absorbance to the overpotential modulation divided by the Tafel slope, and the ratio cancels the unknown absorptivities and channel height. From that ratio the paper extracts Tafel slopes of $34\pm 2$ mV for MV and $38\pm 2$ mV for 4-HO-TEMPO, a charge-transfer resistance of $104\pm 5\,\Omega$, and total resistances from 400 to 715 Ω, with values that stay consistent across channel geometries and electrolyte concentrations. The paper claims these are the first direct operando measurements of Tafel kinetics for both electrodes in a working RFB, and that the data can serve as reference values for numerical simulations and flow-battery design.

What carries the argument

The identity $\frac{|\delta A|}{\Delta A} = \frac{|\mathrm{sinc}\,\tilde{\omega}|}{b}\left(|\delta E_{\mathrm{RFB}}| - R_{\mathrm{tot}}|\delta j|\right)$ is the load-bearing object. It is derived from the Beer-Lambert law and the analytical solution of a 1D advection-reaction equation for the average concentration in a thin microchannel, where convection dominates diffusion and the concentration drop across the electrode is small enough to linearize the exponential decay. The ratio $|\delta A|/\Delta A$ cancels the molar absorptivity $\kappa$ and channel height $h$, so the Tafel slope can be read from the intercept of a plot against $|\delta j|$, and the total resistance from its slope. The other key element is the assignment $\delta\eta \approx \delta E_{\mathrm{RFB}} - R_{\mathrm{tot}}\delta j$, which replaces a reference-electrode measurement of the single-electrode overpotential with the measured cell voltage and current.

What would settle it

Insert a reference electrode (or a thin probe electrode) into the microfluidic cell and directly measure the potential modulation of the MV and 4-HO-TEMPO electrodes during the same voltage-modulation protocol; if the directly measured single-electrode $|\delta\eta|$ differs from $|\delta E_{\mathrm{RFB}}| - R_{\mathrm{tot}}|\delta j|$ by more than the reported few-millivolt uncertainty, then Eq. 15 fails and the image-derived Tafel slopes are not the true electrode kinetics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a membraneless microfluidic RFB the modulus of the absorbance modulation divided by the DC absorbance change obeys $\frac{|\delta A|}{\Delta A} = \frac{|\delta \eta|}{b}\,|\mathrm{sinc}\,\tilde{\omega}|$, where $\delta\eta$ is the electrode overpotential modulation, $b$ the Tafel slope, and $\tilde{\omega}$ a dimensionless downstream frequency. Because $\tilde{\omega}$ is known from the flow rate and geometry, and because the overpotential modulation is written as $\delta\eta \approx \delta E_{\mathrm{RFB}} - R_{\mathrm{tot}}\,\delta j$, a linear regression of $|\delta A|/\Delta A$ against $|\delta j|$ at fixed voltage modulation yields $b$ from the intercept and $R_{\mathrm{tot}}$ from the slope. Applied to the MV/4-HO-TEMPO system, the method gives Tafel slopes of $34\pm 2$ mV and $38\pm 2$ mV, a charge-transfer resistance of $104\pm 5\,\Omega$, and total resistances of $400$–$715\,\Omega$; the slopes are independent of electrolyte concentration and channel height, while the resistances track those geometric and concentration changes. The paper presents this as the first direct operando measurement of Tafel kinetics, charge-transfer resistance, and charge-transport resistance for both anolyte and catholyte reactants during RFB operation.

Load-bearing premise

The method depends on the assumption that the full-cell voltage modulation, minus the total ohmic drop, equals the overpotential modulation at a single electrode, even though both the MV and 4-HO-TEMPO electrodes are electroactive and share the cell voltage; if that division is incorrect, the fitted Tafel slopes are not single-electrode kinetics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reported Tafel slopes and resistances can be used as reference inputs for numerical simulations of MV/4-HO-TEMPO flow batteries and for electrode and channel design optimization.
  • Because the ratio identity cancels absorptivity and channel height, the same protocol can be applied to other colored redox couples by changing the illumination wavelength from UV to IR.
  • The constant Tafel slopes across channel heights and NaCl concentrations support the claim that the extracted kinetics are intrinsic to the MV and 4-HO-TEMPO reactions, while the variable resistances quantify charge transport.
  • The linear fits of Eq. 16 across the tested voltage range indicate that Tafel kinetics describe the system under the operating overpotentials used here.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of Eq. 15 with a reference electrode would strengthen the method; the paper's agreement with rotating-electrode values is suggestive but indirect, because it compares steady-state kinetics with modulated overpotentials.
  • The spatially resolved $|\delta A|$ fields could be processed pixel-by-pixel instead of channel-averaged, giving local Tafel-slope maps that might expose non-uniform aging, fouling, or flow maldistribution during cycling.
  • If the identity holds for other couples, it turns a microscope and a camera into a screening tool for organic redox electrolytes, since no reference electrode or calibration is needed; the two-electrode voltage-division caveat would need re-checking for each new couple.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a spectroelectrochemical imaging method to measure Tafel slopes and charge transfer resistances in a membraneless microfluidic redox flow battery using methyl viologen (MV) and 4-HO-TEMPO. The method combines EIS and visible absorption imaging, using the calibration-free ratio |δA|/ΔA to extract kinetic parameters. The authors report Tafel slopes of 34±2 mV for MV and 38±2 mV for 4-HO-TEMPO, a total resistance that varies from 400 to 715 Ω, and a charge transfer resistance of 104±5 Ω, all obtained without a reference electrode or absorptivity calibration.

Significance. If the method were valid, it would offer a valuable in-situ route to measure individual electrode kinetics in flow batteries, avoiding reference electrodes and molar absorptivity calibration. The imaging data and analytical model could also serve as benchmarks for numerical simulations. However, the central derivation connecting the measured full-cell voltage to the individual electrode overpotential perturbation is not justified, so the reported Tafel slopes and charge transfer resistance are not reliably linked to the electrode kinetics. The experimental concept and the calibration-free absorbance ratio are promising, but the paper does not establish the key assumption needed for their interpretation.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.3, Eq. (15)] Equation (15) sets δη ≈ δE_RFB - R_tot δj for the overpotential modulation used in the Tafel analysis. This relation is not derived and is not valid for a two-electrode cell in which both electrodes are electroactive. In such a cell, the full-cell voltage modulation obeys δE_RFB = δη_a + δη_c + R_HF δj + δη_conc, where δη_a and δη_c are the activation overpotential modulations of the two electrodes. Since the paper defines R_tot as containing both R_CT and R_HF (Section 3.3 and Fig. 5c), the quantity δE_RFB - R_tot δj approximates δη_conc, not the overpotential of either electrode. Even if R_tot were replaced by R_HF, one would obtain δη_a + δη_c, a sum, rather than the individual electrode overpotential. Consequently, the factor |δη| in Eqs. (10) and (16) is not the activation overpotential that appears in the Butler-Volmer/Tafel source term (Eq. 3), and the fitted Tafel slopes lack a demonstrated physical meaning.
  2. [3.3, Eq. (16) and Fig. 5] The same right-hand side, |δE_RFB| - R_tot|δj|, is used for both the MV and the 4-HO-TEMPO fits. If Eq. (15) were correct, this would imply that the two electrodes share the identical overpotential modulation magnitude, which is not a general property of a two-electrode cell with different redox couples. The linear regressions in Fig. 5 therefore do not independently determine two distinct Tafel slopes; they merely attribute different measured absorbance ratios to the same overpotential driver. The separate b values in Table 1 thus cannot be interpreted as the individual electrode kinetic parameters without additional information about the potential division.
  3. [3.3, validation by 2D simulation] The text states that a 2D numerical simulation in the supplementary information validates the assumption of a 1D potential distribution in the y-direction. Even if such a simulation were provided, it would not address the division of the full-cell overpotential between the anode and cathode, which is the crux of Eq. (15). The manuscript does not show the simulated potential fields or the comparison with the 1D approximation, so the load-bearing assumption behind Eq. (15) remains unsupported. A brief statement in the text is not sufficient for a claim on which the quantitative results depend.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence 'since 10 years' should read 'for 10 years'.
  2. [Introduction, first paragraph after Eq. (9)] The phrase 'propose a direct and easy estimation' is missing the word 'to' before 'propose'.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'enables the first direct measurement' should use 'enable' to agree with the compound subject 'absence' and 'transfers'.
  4. [Table 1] The reported average Tafel slopes '34±2 mV and 38±2 mV' do not match exactly the individual values listed in the table (e.g., 30±2, 36±2, etc.); a brief explanation of the averaging would improve reproducibility.
  5. [3.3] The modulus of the difference in Eq. (16) is written as |δE_RFB| - R_tot|δj|, which implicitly assumes the phasors are collinear and |δE_RFB| > R_tot|δj|. Although the paper notes that the current and voltage are in phase at the low modulation frequency, this assumption should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Tafel slopes and resistances are fitted outputs of an independently derived transport model; the main concerns are modeling validity, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain from the averaged 1D transport equation (Eq. 2) through the linearized modulated-concentration equation (Eq. 6) to the calibration-free ratio (Eqs. 10 and 14) is presented in the text and rests on standard transport and Butler-Volmer/Tafel assumptions; the citations to prior work, including the authors' own [21,22,37,38], are not load-bearing because the needed equations are either re-derived in the paper or are standard textbook results. The Tafel slope b and total resistance R_tot are obtained by a two-parameter linear regression of Eq. (16); they are fitted outputs, not predictions equivalent to the input data by construction. The linearity of the fit and the inequality eta_bar >> b using the fitted b are self-consistency checks, not circular reductions, and the Tafel slopes are benchmarked against independent rotating-electrode values (Janoschka et al.). The principal vulnerability identified by the skeptic, namely Eq. (15) identifying delta_E_RFB - R_tot delta_j with an individual electrode overpotential in a two-electrode cell with both electrodes active, is a modeling-validity and identifiability concern, not a definitional circularity: if Eq. (15) is wrong the reported numbers would not follow from the data, but they are not forced by an equation that defines the output in terms of itself. The asserted 2D simulation validation is referenced to supplementary material and is not shown in the manuscript, which is a missing-support issue but not a circular step. No load-bearing self-citation chain or fitted-parameter-renamed-as-prediction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation requires several domain assumptions about transport and optics, plus one load-bearing ad hoc assumption about how cell voltage maps to electrode overpotential. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Tafel slope b (MV) = 34±2 mV
    Extracted from the intercept of the linear regression of Eq (16) for the catholyte (MV) images.
  • Tafel slope b (4-HO-TEMPO) = 38±2 mV
    Extracted from the intercept of the linear regression of Eq (16) for the anolyte (4-HO-TEMPO) images.
  • Total resistance R_tot = 400-715 Ω (varies with conditions)
    Extracted from the slope of the same linear regression; used in Eq (15) to estimate overpotential modulation.
  • Charge transfer resistance R_CT = 104±5 Ω
    Obtained by subtracting the EIS high-frequency resistance R_HF from the fitted R_tot; part of the equivalent circuit.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Tafel law holds for both reactions with overpotential much larger than b
    Eq (3) reduces Butler-Volmer to Tafel; checked in Section 3.3 with η>0.1 V.
  • domain assumption Beer-Lambert law with constant absorptivity, linear relationship between absorbance and concentration
    Used in Eqs (12)-(13) to convert measured light signal to concentration.
  • domain assumption Advection-dominated transport with negligible diffusion, plug-flow 1D average concentration
    Justified by timescale arguments in Section 2.2; velocities 2-3 mm/s >> 0.15 mm/s.
  • domain assumption Small concentration variation allows linearization of exponential and e^{-α} ≈ 1
    Used to derive Eq (10) from Eq (9); error up to 15% in worst case.
  • ad hoc to paper The full-cell voltage modulation transferred to each electrode overpotential via δη ≈ δE_RFB - R_tot δj
    Eq (15); not derived from the two-electrode cell potential balance; load-bearing and unverified.
  • domain assumption Sinusoidal steady state and no phase shift between voltage and current at 0.25 Hz
    Observed in Figure 2(a); used to replace complex moduli by real differences.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Image-based measurements of Tafel slopes in aqueous MV/4-HO-TEMPO Flow Batteries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VM7JX356

@misc{pith2026250601264,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Image-based measurements of Tafel slopes in aqueous MV/4-HO-TEMPO Flow Batteries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VM7JX356}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01264}
}
read the original abstract

A total organic aqueous redox flow battery (RFB) employing methyl viologen (MV) electrolyte and 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (4-HO-TEMPO) is tested and characterized under microfluidic conditions. The absence of physical membrane and the quasi-two-dimensional energy transfers occurring in this RFB design enables the first direct measurement of Tafel kinetics, charge transfer, and charge transport resistances for both anolyte and catholyte reactants during the RFB operations. The methodology reported in this work combines spectroelectrochemical imaging and analytical modeling of the periodic mass and charge transfer equations. The Tafel kinetics and charge transfers resistances are measured through several RFB geometries and operating conditions without the need of reference electrode nor absorptivity coefficient calibration, which simplifies the experimental setup, eases the measurements and suppresses the uncertainty related to the electrolyte potential value. Data provided in this work (concentration fields, kinetics properties, electrochemical impedances) quantify the charge transfer in these systems and can serve as reference values for further advanced RFB numerical simulations and design optimization.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    X. Yuan, C. Song, A. Platt, N. Zhao, H. Wang, H. Li, K. Fatih, D. Jang, A review of all‐ vanadium redox flow battery durability: Degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies, Int. J. Energy Res. 43 (2019) er.4607

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Lee, M.-A

    J.W. Lee, M.-A. Goulet, E. Kjeang, Microfluidic redox battery, Lab Chip. 13 (2013) 2504

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Weber, M.M

    A.Z. Weber, M.M. Mench, J.P. Meyers, P.N. Ross, J.T. Gostick, Q. Liu, Redox flow batteries: a review, J. Appl. Electrochem. 41 (2011) 1137–1164

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Clemente, R

    A. Clemente, R. Costa -Castelló, Redox flow batteries: A literature review oriented to automatic control, Energies. 13 (2020) 1–31

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Janoschka, N

    T. Janoschka, N. Martin, U. Martin, C. Friebe, S. Morgenstern, H. Hiller, M.D. Hager, U.S. Schubert, An aqueous, polymer -based redox-flow battery using non -corrosive, safe, and low-cost materials, Nature. 527 (2015) 78–81

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    S. Hou, L. Chen, X. Fan, X. Fan, X. Ji, B. Wang, C. Cui, J. Chen, C. Yang, W. Wang, C. Li, C. Wang, High-energy and low -cost membrane -free chlorine flow battery , Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 1–8

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Navalpotro, C

    P. Navalpotro, C. Trujillo, I. Montes, C.M.S.S. Neves, J. Palma, M.G. Freire, J.A.P. Coutinho, R. Marcilla, Critical aspects of membrane -free aqueous battery based on two immiscible neutral electrolytes, Energy Storage Mater. 26 (2020) 400–407

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    T. Liu, X. Wei, Z. Nie, V. Sprenkle, W. Wang, A Total Organic Aqueous Redox Flow Battery Employing a Low Cost and Sustainable Methyl Viologen Anolyte and 4‐HO‐ TEMPO Catholyte, Adv. Energy Mater. 6 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Sasaki, T

    Y. Sasaki, T. Minami, Organic Field -Effect Transistors for Interfacial Chemistry: Monitoring Reactions on SAMs at the Solid–Liquid Interface, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    Gong, A.L

    Y. Gong, A.L. Clemens, J.T. Davis, C. Orme, N.A. Dudukovic, A.N. Ivanovskaya, R. Akolkar, Methods—Design Guidelines for Tubular Flow -through Electrodes for Use in Electroanalytical Studies of Redox Reaction Kinetics , J. Electrochem. Soc. 168 (2021) 043505

    2021

  3. [11]

    Stricker, X

    E.A. Stricker, X. Ke, J.S. Wainright, R.R. Unocic, R.F. Savinell, Current Density Distribution in Electrochemical Cells with Small Cell Heights and Coplanar Thin Electrodes as Used in ec-S/TEM Cell Geometries, J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 (2019) H126– H134

    2019

  4. [12]

    Cazot, G

    M. Cazot, G. Maranzana, J. Dillet, F. Beille, T. Godet -Bar, S. Didierjean, Symmetric-cell characterization of the redox flow battery system: Application to the detection of degradations, Electrochim. Acta. 321 (2019) 134705

    2019

  5. [13]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y. Qian, R. Feng, Y. Ding, X. Zu, C. Zhang, X. Guo, W. Wang, G. Yu, Reversible redox chemistry in azobenzene -based organic molecules for high -capacity and long -life nonaqueous redox flow batteries, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 1–11

    2020

  6. [14]

    H. Park, G. Kwon, H. Lee, K. Lee, S.Y. Park, J.E. Kwon, K. Kang, S.J. Kim, In operando visualization of redox flow battery in membrane -free microfluidic platform , Proc. Natl. 26 Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119 (2022) 1–9

    2022

  7. [15]

    Chaabene, K

    N. Chaabene, K. Ngo, M. Turmine, V. Vivier, Ionic liquid redox flow membraneless battery in microfluidic system, J. Energy Storage. 57 (2023) 106270

    2023

  8. [16]

    Da Mota, D.A

    N. Da Mota, D.A. Finkelstein, J.D. Kirtland, C.A. Rodriguez, A.D. Stroock, H.D. Abruña, Membraneless, room-temperature, direct borohydride/cerium fuel cell with power density of over 0.25 W/cm 2, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 6076–6079

    2012

  9. [17]

    Mousavi Shaegh, N.-T

    S.A. Mousavi Shaegh, N.-T. Nguyen, S.H. Chan, A review on membraneless laminar flow- based fuel cells, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 36 (2011) 5675–5694

    2011

  10. [18]

    Y. Li, W. Van Roy, P.M. Vereecken, L. Lagae, Effects of laminar flow within a versatile microfluidic chip for in-situ electrode characterization and fuel cells , Microelectron. Eng. 181 (2017) 47–54

    2017

  11. [19]

    Ibrahim, M

    O.A. Ibrahim, M. Navarro -Segarra, P. Sadeghi, N. Sabaté, J.P. Esquivel, E. Kjeang, Microfluidics for Electrochemical Energy Conversion, Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 7236–7266

    2022

  12. [20]

    Bazylak, D

    A. Bazylak, D. Sinton, N. Djilali, Improved fuel utilization in microfluidic fuel cells: A computational study, J. Power Sources. 143 (2005) 57–66

    2005

  13. [21]

    Garcia, A

    M. Garcia, A. Sommier, D. Michau, J. -C. Batsale, S. Chevalier, Operando Spectroelectrochemical Imaging of Concentration Fields and Tafel Kinetics in Microfluidic Electrochemical Devices, Anal. Chem. 96 (2024) 16487–16492

    2024

  14. [22]

    Chevalier, Semianalytical modeling of the mass transfer in microfluidic electrochemical chips, Phys

    S. Chevalier, Semianalytical modeling of the mass transfer in microfluidic electrochemical chips, Phys. Rev. E. 104 (2021) 035110

    2021

  15. [23]

    Navalpotro, C.S

    P. Navalpotro, C.S. Santos, M.L. Alcantara, V. Muñoz -Perales, S.E. Ibañez, A. Martínez - Bejarano, N. Jiyane, C.M.S.S. Neves, R. Rubio -Presa, T. Quast, W. Schuhmann, J.A.P. Coutinho, R. Marcilla, Enhancing the Stability of Aqueous Membrane-Free Flow Batteries: Insights into ...

    2025

  16. [24]

    Torres, J

    M.J. Torres, J. Hervas‐Ortega, B. Oraá‐Poblete, A.B. de Quirós, A.A. Maurice, D. Perez‐ Antolin, A.E. Quintero, Membraneless Micro Redox Flow Battery: From Vanadium to Alkaline Quinone, Batter. Supercaps. 202400331 (2024) 1–7

    2024

  17. [25]

    Utterback, A.J

    J.K. Utterback, A.J. King, L. Belman-Wells, D.M. Larson, L.M. Hamerlynck, A.Z. Weber, N.S. Ginsberg, Operando Label-Free Optical Imaging of Solution-Phase Ion Transport and Electrochemistry, ACS Energy Lett. 8 (2023) 1785–1792

    2023

  18. [26]

    Sarrazin, J

    F. Sarrazin, J. -B. Salmon, D. Talaga, L. Servant, Chemical Reaction Imaging within Microfluidic Devices Using Confocal Raman Spectroscopy: The Case of Water and Deuterium Oxide as a Model System, Anal. Chem. 80 (2008) 1689–1695

    2008

  19. [27]

    Krause, C

    K. Krause, C. Palka, M. Garcia, A. Erriguible, S. Glockner, J. -L. Battaglia, S. Chevalier, Heat and mass transfer visualisation of an exothermic acid-base microfluidic reactor using infrared thermospectroscopy, Quant. Infrared Thermogr. J. 00 (2024) 1–18

    2024

  20. [28]

    Chevalier, J

    S. Chevalier, J. -N. Tourvieille, A. Sommier, C. Pradère, Infrared thermospectroscopic imaging of heat and mass transfers in laminar microfluidic reactive flows , Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 8 (2021) 100166

    2021

  21. [29]

    Kuriyama, T

    R. Kuriyama, T. Nakagawa, K. Tatsumi, K. Nakabe, Two-dimensional fluid viscosity measurement in microchannel flow using fluorescence polarization imaging , Meas. Sci. 27 Technol. 32 (2021) 095402

    2021

  22. [30]

    Garoz‐Ruiz, J.V

    J. Garoz‐Ruiz, J.V. Perales‐Rondon, A. Heras, A. Colina, Spectroelectrochemical Sensing: Current Trends and Challenges, Electroanalysis. 31 (2019) 1254–1278

    2019

  23. [31]

    Fish, S.G

    J.R. Fish, S.G. Swarts, M.D. Sevilla, T. Malinski, Electrochemistry and spectroelectrochemistry of nitroxyl free radicals, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 3745–3751

    1988

  24. [32]

    Garcia, A

    M. Garcia, A. Sommier, D. Michau, G. Clisson, J. -C. Batsale, S. Chevalier, Imaging concentration fields in microfluidic fuel cells as a mass transfer characterization platform, Electrochim. Acta. 460 (2023) 142489

    2023

  25. [33]

    Matheu, M.Z

    R. Matheu, M.Z. Ertem, M. Pipelier, J. Lebreton, D. Dubreuil, J. Benet-Buchholz, X. Sala, A. Tessier, A. Llobet, The Role of Seven -Coordination in Ru-Catalyzed Water Oxidation, ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 2039–2048

    2018

  26. [34]

    Bruus, Theoretical microfluidics, Oxford university press, 2008

    H. Bruus, Theoretical microfluidics, Oxford university press, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    Żamojć, M

    K. Żamojć, M. Zdrowowicz, W. Wiczk, D. Jacewicz, L. Chmurzyński, Dihydroxycoumarins as highly selective fluorescent probes for the fast detection of 4 - hydroxy-TEMPO in aqueous solution, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 63807–63812

    2015

  28. [36]

    Aristov, A

    N. Aristov, A. Habekost, Electrochromism of Methylviologen (Paraquat), World J. Chem. Educ. 3 (2015) 82–86

    2015

  29. [37]

    Chevalier, J

    S. Chevalier, J. -C. Olivier, C. Josset, B. Auvity, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell operating in stoichiometric regime, J. Power Sources. 440 (2019) 227100

    2019

  30. [38]

    Chevalier, M

    S. Chevalier, M. Garcia, A. Sommier, J. -C. Batsale, Semianalytical mass transfer impedance model in microfluidic electrochemical chips, (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Dickinson, A.J

    E.J.F. Dickinson, A.J. Wain, The Butler -Volmer equation in electrochemical theory: Origins, value, and practical application, J. Electroanal. Chem. 872 (2020) 114145

    2020

  32. [40]

    Taqieddin, M.R

    A. Taqieddin, M.R. Allshouse, A.N. Alshawabkeh, Editors’ Choice —Critical Review — Mathematical Formulations of Electrochemically Gas -Evolving Systems, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165 (2018) E694–E711

    2018

  33. [41]

    Kulikovsky, O

    A. Kulikovsky, O. Shamardina, A Model for PEM Fuel Cell Impedance: Oxygen Flow in the Channel Triggers Spatial and Frequency Oscillations of the Local Impedance , J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 (2015) F1068–F1077

    2015

  34. [42]

    Eikerling, A.A

    M. Eikerling, A.A. Kornyshev, Electrochemical impedance of the cathode catalyst layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Electroanal. Chem. 475 (1999) 107–123

    1999

  35. [43]

    Maranzana, J

    G. Maranzana, J. Mainka, O. Lottin, J. Dillet, A. Lamibrac, A. Thomas, S. Didierjean, A proton exchange membrane fuel cell impedance model taking into account convection along the air channel: On the bias between the low frequency limit of the impedance and the slope of the po...

    2012

  36. [44]

    Mainka, G

    J. Mainka, G. Maranzana, J. Dillet, S. Didierjean, O. Lottin, Effect of Oxygen Depletion Along the Air Channel of a PEMFC on the Warburg Diffusion Impedance, J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 (2010) B1561

    2010

  37. [45]

    Kulikovsky, Exact low –current analytical solution for impedance of the cathode catalyst layer in a PEM fuel cell, Electrochim

    A.A. Kulikovsky, Exact low –current analytical solution for impedance of the cathode catalyst layer in a PEM fuel cell, Electrochim. Acta. 147 (2014) 773–777. 28

    2014

  38. [46]

    Das, T.K

    T.N. Das, T.K. Ghanty, H. Pal, Reactions of methyl viologen dication (MV2+) with H atoms in aqueous solution: Mechanism derived from pulse radiolysis measurements and ab initio MO calculations, J. Phys. Chem. A. 107 (2003) 5998–6006

    2003

  39. [47]

    Gerken, S.S

    J.B. Gerken, S.S. Stahl, High-potential electrocatalytic O2 reduction with nitroxyl/NOx mediators: Implications for fuel cells and aerobic oxidation catalysis , ACS Cent. Sci. 1 (2015) 234–243

    2015

  40. [48]

    S. Hu, L. Wang, X. Yuan, Z. Xiang, M. Huang, P. Luo, Y. Liu, Z. Fu, Z. Liang, Viologen- Decorated TEMPO for Neutral Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries , Energy Mater. Adv. 2021 (2021) 1–8

    2021

  41. [49]

    Chevalier, B

    S. Chevalier, B. Auvity, J.C. Olivier, C. Josset, D. Trichet, M. Machmoum, Detection of Cells State -of-Health in PEM Fuel Cell Stack Using EIS Measurements Coupled with Multiphysics Modeling, Fuel Cells. 14 (2014) 416–429

    2014

  42. [50]

    Mainka, G

    J. Mainka, G. Maranzana, J. Dillet, S. Didierjean, O. Lottin, On the estimation of high frequency parameters of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells via Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, J. Power Sources. 253 (2014) 381–391

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.