Universal Coacting Hopf algebra of a Finite dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra

Goutam Mukherjee; Saikat Goswami; Satyendra Kumar Mishra

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 25 references

Universal Coacting Hopf algebra of a Finite dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra has a universal coacting Hopf algebra that is initial among all commutative Hopf algebras coacting on it.

desk verdict The bialgebra-level universal coacting construction for Lie-Yamaguti algebras is solid and new, but the claimed Hopf algebra version relies on an unproven left adjoint that the cited source does not supply. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01328 v1 pith:QH3IXVTM submitted 2025-06-02 math.RA

Saikat Goswami , Satyendra Kumar Mishra , Goutam Mukherjee This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.RA MSC 16D9016T0516T1017A3017A3617A60

keywords Lie-YamagutialgebrasuniversalcoactingHopfalgebrabialgebracurrentfunctorautomorphismgroupabeliangradingsmodulesfinitedual

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that every finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra $L$ carries a universal coacting Hopf algebra $H(L)$: a commutative Hopf algebra equipped with a coaction $L \to L \otimes H(L)$ through which every coaction of $L$ by any commutative Hopf algebra factors by a unique Hopf-algebra map. The construction first produces a universal coacting bialgebra $A(L)$ as a quotient of a polynomial algebra by relations encoding the binary and ternary brackets of $L$, then passes to the free commutative Hopf algebra generated by the underlying coalgebra. The universal object matters because it packages all symmetry-like structures of $L$: the paper identifies the automorphism group of $L$ with the invertible group-like elements of the finite dual of $A(L)$, and it classifies abelian group gradings of $L$ as conjugacy classes of bialgebra maps from $A(L)$ to the group algebra of the grading group. If the main theorem is right, Lie-Yamaguti algebras receive the same universal coaction theory that already organizes associative, Lie, and Leibniz algebras.

What carries the argument

The engine is the pair $(A(L), \Phi_L)$. Here $A(L)$ is $K[X_{ij}: 1 \le i,j \le n]$ modulo the ideal generated by the universal polynomials $P^{(L)}_{(a,i,j)}$ and $Q^{(L)}_{(a,i,j,k)}$, which translate the bracket constants $[e_i,e_j]=\sum_s \tau^s_{ij}e_s$ and $\{e_i,e_j,e_k\}=\sum_s \omega^s_{ijk}e_s$ into quadratic and cubic relations on the generators $x_{ij}$. The coaction $\Phi_L(e_i)=\sum_s e_s \otimes x_{si}$ turns $L$ into a right $A(L)$-comodule. The universal property arises from the adjunction between $A(L,-)$ and the current Lie-Yamaguti algebra functor $L \otimes -$, and the comultiplication $\Delta(x_{ij})=\sum_s x_{is}\otimes x_{sj}$ with counit $\varepsilon(x_{ij})=\delta_{ij}$ makes $A(L)$ a bialgebra. Applying the free commutative Hopf algebra construction to the coalgebra underlying $A(L)$ yields $H(L)$, and the free-Hopf-algebra adjunction transfers the bialgebra universal property to Hopf algebras.

What would settle it

Pick a finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra with a nonzero ternary bracket, for example a Heisenberg Lie-Yamaguti algebra, and a commutative algebra $A$ with nontrivial idempotents or nilpotents, then directly verify whether $[x\otimes a, y\otimes b]=[x,y]\otimes ab$ and $\{x\otimes a, y\otimes b, z\otimes c\}=\{x,y,z\}\otimes abc$ satisfy the defining identities (LY3) through (LY6). One failure would falsify the existence of the current Lie-Yamaguti algebra functor and therefore of the adjunction and universal Hopf algebra.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.16: for any commutative Hopf algebra $H$ and any Lie-Yamaguti algebra morphism $f: L \to L \otimes H$ making $L$ a right $H$-comodule, there exists a unique Hopf algebra morphism $g: H(L) \to H$ such that $(\mathrm{id}_L \otimes g) \circ X_L = f$. Thus $H(L)$, together with its coaction $X_L$, is the initial object in the category of commutative Hopf algebras coacting on $L$. The proof establishes the bialgebra-level universal property first: $A(L)$, with coaction $\Phi_L$, is initial among commutative bialgebras coacting on $L$, and $H(L)=\mathcal{L}(A(L))$ is the free commutative Hopf algebra generated by the underlying coalgebra of $A(L)$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's constructions rest on Example 2.5, which asserts without proof that tensoring any Lie-Yamaguti algebra $L$ with any commutative algebra $A$ gives a Lie-Yamaguti algebra under the displayed bracket formulas; if that assertion failed for some $A$, the current-algebra functor, its adjoint, and the universal coactions would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every commutative Hopf coaction on $L$ factors through the single universal coaction $X_L$, so $H(L)$ is the one object controlling all symmetry-like coactions on $L$.
The automorphism group $\mathrm{Aut}(L)$ is isomorphic to the group of invertible group-like elements of the finite dual $A(L)^\circ$, with the isomorphism given explicitly by $\theta \mapsto (\sum_s \theta(x_{si})e_s)$.
Isomorphism classes of $G$-gradings on $L$ are in bijection with conjugacy classes of bialgebra maps $A(L) \to K[G]$, reducing grading classification to understanding maps out of $A(L)$.
For finite-dimensional $L$-modules, the universal $A(L,K)$-module construction makes the functors $U \otimes -$ and $\mathcal{U}$ into an adjoint pair between module categories, giving a representation-theoretic analogue of the main construction.
When a Leibniz algebra is viewed as a Lie-Yamaguti algebra, its universal algebra $A(L)$ is a quotient of the Leibniz universal algebra, so the new invariants refine the earlier Leibniz-level invariants.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: Because $L$ is finite-dimensional, $A(L)$ is a quotient of a polynomial ring in finitely many variables by finitely many quadratic and cubic universal polynomials; consequently $H(L)$ is finitely generated, and the automorphism group and grading classification of $L$ are in principle computable by explicit polynomial algebra, although the paper does not address computational e
Editorial extension: The same adjunction template should produce universal coacting Hopf algebras for other ternary algebraic structures, such as Lie triple systems, whenever a current-algebra functor can be validly defined; the paper's proof gives the blueprint.
Editorial extension: For the Heisenberg Lie-Yamaguti algebras in Example 3.11, the displayed universal polynomials give a finite presentation of $A(H_n)$, so applying Theorems 5.1 and 5.5 to them yields the full automorphism group and abelian grading classification for that family, a computation the paper does not carry out.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper genuinely extends the Manin–Tambara/Agore–Militaru universal coacting construction from Lie/Leibniz to Lie-Yamaguti algebras, and the bialgebra-level machinery is in good shape. But the advertised Hopf-algebra version rests on an unproven existence assertion: the authors cite Takeuchi for a functor that Takeuchi's paper does not appear to construct.

What is new and good: Theorem 3.1 explicitly constructs the universal algebra A(L,K) from structure constants and proves the adjunction with the current Lie-Yamaguti algebra functor. The proof is detailed and correct. Theorem 3.12 gives A(L) a bialgebra structure with the expected matrix coproduct, and Theorem 3.14 proves the universal property among commutative bialgebras. These are genuine extensions to the ternary bracket setting, with cubic relations appearing in the universal polynomials. The applications in Section 5 — the automorphism group via group-like elements of the finite dual, and the classification of abelian group gradings via bialgebra maps to K[G] — are sensible and mostly adapted correctly from the Lie/Leibniz cases. The representation-theoretic universal module in Section 4 is a plausible further extension, though with the usual "similarly" gaps.

Soft spots, in proportion: Example 2.5 is stated without proof, but it is easily verified and not a real concern. The "similarly" in Theorems 4.1 and 4.6 are routine relation checks; I would want one example written out, but they are not dangerous. Theorem 5.5 is delegated to a "similar argument" in [2] without a proof; that is a bit thin for a classification theorem, but the adaptation appears mechanical.

The load-bearing problem is Definition 3.15 and Theorem 3.16. The paper asserts a left adjoint L: ComBiAlg→ComHopf exists, citing [21]. But Section 2's construction from [21] is the free Hopf algebra on a coalgebra, which is generally noncommutative. The commutative Hopf envelope of a commutative bialgebra is a different object, and the paper never constructs it or proves its universal property. For an abelian L, the Section 2 object is not commutative, so H(L) as defined is ambiguous at best. Theorem 3.16's initial-object claim does not follow from what is written. This matters because the title and abstract lead with the universal coacting Hopf algebra; the paper as it stands only rigorously delivers the bialgebra version.

Who this is for: specialists in non-associative algebra and universal coacting objects. The bialgebra construction and applications give the paper real value, but the Hopf-level gap needs a major repair — either a proper construction of the commutative Hopf envelope or a correct reference for it. I would send this to a serious referee, expecting heavy revision.

Recommendation: engage, but only after the authors fix the Hopf algebra existence claim. The bialgebra part is publishable; the Hopf part is not yet supported.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces, for a finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra L, a commutative algebra A(L,K) defined by structure-constant generators and relations, and proves in Theorem 3.1 that A(L,−) is left adjoint to the current algebra functor L⊗−. Taking K=L, the authors show that A(L) carries a bialgebra structure whose comultiplication encodes the coaction Φ_L:L→L⊗A(L) (Theorem 3.12), with the universal property stated in Theorem 3.14. They then define a universal coacting Hopf algebra H(L)=L(A(L)) by formally applying a left adjoint L from commutative bialgebras to commutative Hopf algebras, which they attribute to reference [21] (Definition 3.15 and Theorem 3.16). Section 4 constructs universal A(L,K)-modules and adjoint functors between module categories (Theorems 4.1, 4.6, 4.7). Section 5 applies these objects to parametrize automorphisms (Theorem 5.1) and abelian group gradings (Theorem 5.5).

Significance. The main adjunction Theorem 3.1 is a substantial and mostly self-contained construction; it gives a genuine universal object for Lie-Yamaguti algebras analogous to Tambara and Manin's constructions. The representation-theoretic Section 4 is also explicit and could be useful, and the applications in Section 5 are natural once the universal properties are in place. The paper is honest about several 'similarly' verifications, but the central obstruction is that the Hopf envelope step defining H(L) is not actually constructed. If that gap is closed, the paper would be a solid contribution to the universal coacting algebra literature; as it stands, the main advertised object is not rigorously established.

major comments (5)

[Section 2 and Definition 3.15 / Theorem 3.16] The paper asserts that [21] provides a left adjoint L: ComBiAlg_K→ComHopf_K sending a commutative bialgebra to a free commutative Hopf algebra, but the construction recalled in Section 2 is Takeuchi's free Hopf algebra generated by a coalgebra, which is not commutative in general. Thus H(L)=L(A(L)) is not defined by the paper's own material. Concretely, for L=K^2 abelian, A(L)=K[x_ij] with Δ(x_ij)=Σ_k x_ik⊗x_kj; the Section 2 quotient T(V)/I has generators x_ij and y_ij satisfying only the matrix inverse relations, and x_11 does not commute with x_12 there, so it is not the commutative Hopf algebra K[GL_2] that should coact on the abelian L. The authors must provide a real construction, or a correct reference, for the commutative Hopf envelope of a commutative bialgebra and prove its universal property before Theorem 3.16 can be accepted.
[Example 2.5] The assertion that L⊗A is a Lie-Yamaguti algebra for every commutative algebra A is stated without proof. Since this example defines the current algebra functor on which Theorem 3.1, Corollary 3.10, and all coaction theorems depend, a direct verification of identities (LY1)-(LY6), or a precise reference, should be added.
[Theorem 4.1] The proof verifies only (R1) and says that (R2)-(R6) can be 'similarly' verified. These identities are load-bearing for the tensor product module structure, and the same argument is not completely immediate because it requires combining the module maps (32)-(34) with the universal relations (7)-(8). Please provide the verifications, or at least one nontrivial identity in full and a statement of how the others follow from the same substitutions.
[Theorem 4.6] In the proof of the universal module, the ρ-diagram and the D-diagram are computed, but the θ-diagram is left to 'similarly'. This matters because the θ-action equations (47) are part of the K-module structure, and the verification is not merely cosmetic. The missing computation, or a precise argument reducing the θ-case to the D-case, should be included.
[Theorem 5.5] The classification of abelian group gradings is asserted by saying that 'using a similar argument to [2, Theorem 3.5]' one obtains the result, without giving the argument. This is one of the paper's announced applications; the proof of the bijection (56) should be written out, or the exact reduction to [2] should be explained, including how the conjugacy relation on bialgebra maps acts on the associated gradings.

minor comments (4)

[Section 2, 'Free Hopf algebra H(C)'] The paragraph heading calls H(C) a 'free commutative Hopf algebra', but the construction described is the free Hopf algebra generated by a coalgebra and is not commutative; the wording should be corrected to avoid the misleading implication.
[Examples 3.5 and 3.6] The labels A(L,K) and A(K,L) in these examples appear inconsistent with Definition 3.7; please clarify which argument is the one-dimensional base algebra and which is the n-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra, and check the displayed relations accordingly.
[Proof of Theorem 3.12] There is a typo in 'Verifying that ε is a count for ∆ is easy'; it should be 'counit'.
[Definition 5.4] The convolution product on Hom(A(L),K[G]) is used in the definition of conjugacy but is not explicitly introduced there; a sentence recalling convolution for maps from a bialgebra to an algebra would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the universal object is built from structure constants and the universal property is proved directly; the only self-citation is for a background example.

full rationale

The paper's central construction in Theorem 3.1 forms A(L,K) as a polynomial quotient by the universal polynomials (5)-(6), and the adjunction is proved by exhibiting a concrete bijection between Hom_{ComAlg}(A(L,K),A) and Hom_{LYA}(K,L⊗A). No parameter is fitted and no target result is assumed. The bialgebra structure on A(L) in Theorem 3.12 is forced by the coaction via the universal property, with Δ(x_{ij})=Σ_s x_{is}⊗x_{sj}; Theorem 3.14 then derives the universal property for commutative bialgebras from the algebra-level universality, and Theorem 3.16 obtains the Hopf-algebra initial object by applying a cited left adjoint L: ComBiAlg_K→ComHopf_K. That adjunction is imported from Takeuchi [21] rather than proved here, so any doubt about it is a correctness or reference gap, not circularity: the cited statement does not assume Theorem 3.16. The applications in Section 5 are direct consequences of the proved universal properties. The only self-citation, [6], is used to attribute the Heisenberg Lie-Yamaguti algebra in Example 3.11 and is not load-bearing for the main results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof rests on standard categorical and Hopf-algebraic background (finite dual, Takeuchi free Hopf algebra, Hom-tensor adjunction) and on the unproved but true assertion that L tensor A is a Lie-Yamaguti algebra for commutative A. No parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated beyond the universal algebras built from generators and relations.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption For every commutative algebra A, L tensor A with the brackets of Example 2.5 is a Lie-Yamaguti algebra
Stated in Example 2.5 without proof; it is the foundation for the current Lie-Yamaguti algebra functor and all coaction constructions.
standard math The free Hopf algebra construction H(C) of Takeuchi [21] gives a left adjoint to the forgetful functor from commutative Hopf algebras to commutative bialgebras
Invoked before Definition 3.15 to form H(L) = L(A(L)); cited to [21] and not proved in the paper.
standard math The finite dual functor ()° from AlgK to CogK is left adjoint to the dual functor ()* from CogK to AlgK
Used in Section 5 to identify group-like elements of A(L)° with algebra maps A(L) to K; standard Sweedler theory.
standard math For finite-dimensional L, the structure constants {tau^s_ij} and {omega^s_ijk} completely determine the Lie-Yamaguti algebra structure
The entire explicit construction of A(L,K) in Theorem 3.1 uses these structure constants as inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Coacting Hopf algebra of a Finite dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QH3IXVTM

@misc{pith2026250601328,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Coacting Hopf algebra of a Finite dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QH3IXVTM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01328}
}

read the original abstract

M. E. Sweedler first constructed a universal Hopf algebra of an algebra. It is known that the dual notions to the existing ones play a dominant role in Hopf algebra theory. Yu. I. Manin and D. Tambara introduced the dual notion of Sweedler's construction in separate works. In this paper, we construct a universal algebra for a finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra. We demonstrate that this universal algebra possesses a bialgebra structure, leading to a universal coacting Hopf algebra for a finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra. Additionally, we develop a representation-theoretic version of our results. As an application, we characterize the automorphism group and classify all abelian group gradings of a finite-dimensional Lie-Yamaguti algebra.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[2]

A. L. Agore and G. Militaru: A new invariant for finite dimensional Leibniz/Lie algebras , Journal of Algebra 562, 390–409 (2020)

2020
[21]

Takeuchi: Free Hopf algebras generated by coalgebras, J

M. Takeuchi: Free Hopf algebras generated by coalgebras, J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 23, 561–582 (1971)

work page 1971
[1]

Abdelwahab, E

H. Abdelwahab, E. Barreiro, A. J. Calder´ on, and A. F. Ouaridi: The classification of nilpotent Lie-Yamaguti algebras , Linear Algebra and its Applications 654, 339–378 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

A. L. Agore: Functors between representation categories. Universal modules, Linear Algebra and its Applications 688, 104–119 (2024)

work page 2024
[4]

Benito, C

P. Benito, C. Draper, and A. Elduque: Lie Yamaguti algebra related to g2, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202, 22–54 (2005)

work page 2005
[5]

Benito, A

P. Benito, A. Elduque, and F. Mart ´ ın-Herce:Irreducible Lie–Yamaguti algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213, 795–808 (2009)

work page 2009
[6]

Goswami, S

S. Goswami, S. K. Mishra, and G. Mukherjee: Automorphisms of extensions of Lie-Yamaguti algebras and inducibility problem , Journal of Algebra 641, 268–306 (2024). UNIVERSAL COACTING HOPF ALGEBRA OF A FINITE DIMENSIONAL LIE-YAMAGUTI ALGEBRA 25

work page 2024
[7]

S. Guo, B. Mondal, and R. Saha: On equivariant Lie–Yamaguti algebras and related structures , Asian-European Journal of Mathematics 16, Issue 2 (2023)

work page 2023

Show all 25 references

[8]

Jacobson: Lie and Jordan triple systems , American Journal of Mathematics 71(1), 149–170 (1949)

N. Jacobson: Lie and Jordan triple systems , American Journal of Mathematics 71(1), 149–170 (1949)

1949
[9]

Kikkawa: On Locally Reductive Spaces and Tangent Algebras , Mem

M. Kikkawa: On Locally Reductive Spaces and Tangent Algebras , Mem. Fac. Lit. & Sci. Shimane Univ Nat. Sci. 5, 1 – 13 (1972)

1972
[10]

Kikkawa: Geometry of homogeneous Lie loops , Hiroshima Math

M. Kikkawa: Geometry of homogeneous Lie loops , Hiroshima Math. J. 5(2), 141–179 (1975)

1975
[11]

Kikkawa: Remarks on solvability of Lie triple algebras , Mem

M. Kikkawa: Remarks on solvability of Lie triple algebras , Mem. Fac. Sci. Shimane Univ. 13, 17–22 (1979)

1979
[12]

Kikkawa: On Killing–Ricci forms of Lie triple algebras , Pacific J

M. Kikkawa: On Killing–Ricci forms of Lie triple algebras , Pacific J. Math. 96(1), 153–161 (1981)

1981
[13]

M. K. Kinyon and A. Weinstein: Leibniz algebras, Courant algebroids, and multiplications on reductive homogeneous spaces , Amer. J. Math. 123(3), 525–550 (2001)

2001
[14]

Y. I. Manin: Quantum Groups and Noncommutative Geometry, Universite de Montreal, Centre de Recherches Mathematiques, Montreal, QC (1988)

1988
[15]

Militaru: The automorphisms group and the classification of gradings of finite dimensional associative algebras , Results in Mathematics 77, 1–13 (2022)

G. Militaru: The automorphisms group and the classification of gradings of finite dimensional associative algebras , Results in Mathematics 77, 1–13 (2022)

2022
[16]

Mondal and R

B. Mondal and R. Saha: Deformation cohomology of morphisms of Lie-Yamaguti algebras , Journal of Algebra (In press) (2024)

2024
[17]

Nomizu: Invariant affine connections on Homogeneous spaces , American Journal of Mathematics 76(1), 33–65 (1954)

K. Nomizu: Invariant affine connections on Homogeneous spaces , American Journal of Mathematics 76(1), 33–65 (1954)

1954
[18]

Raedschelders and M

T. Raedschelders and M. V. den Bergh: The Manin Hopf algebra of a Koszul Artin-Schelter regular algebra is quasi-hereditary , Adv. Math. 305, 601–660 (2017)

2017
[19]

Sagle: A note on simple anti-commutative algebras obtained from reductive homogeneous spaces , Nagoya Math

A. Sagle: A note on simple anti-commutative algebras obtained from reductive homogeneous spaces , Nagoya Math. J. 31, 105–124 (1968)

1968
[20]

M. E. Sweedler: Hopf Algebras, Mathematics Lecture Note Series (1969)

1969
[22]

Tambara: The coendomorphism bialgebra of an algebra , J

D. Tambara: The coendomorphism bialgebra of an algebra , J. Fac. Sci., Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 1A, Math. 37, 425–456 (1990)

1990
[23]

Yamaguti: On Lie triple systems and its generalization , Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University, Ser

K. Yamaguti: On Lie triple systems and its generalization , Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University, Ser. A 21(3), (1958)

1958
[24]

Yamaguti: On the theory of Malcev algebra , Kumamoto J

K. Yamaguti: On the theory of Malcev algebra , Kumamoto J. Sci. A 6, 9–45 (1963)

1963
[25]

Zhang and J

T. Zhang and J. Li: Deformations and extensions of Lie-Yamaguti algebra , Linear and Multilinear Algebra 63(11), 2212–2231 (2015). TCG Centres for Research and Education in Science and Technology, Institute for Advancing Intelligence, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091, West Bengal, In...

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

A. L. Agore and G. Militaru: A new invariant for finite dimensional Leibniz/Lie algebras , Journal of Algebra 562, 390–409 (2020)

2020

[2] [21]

Takeuchi: Free Hopf algebras generated by coalgebras, J

M. Takeuchi: Free Hopf algebras generated by coalgebras, J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 23, 561–582 (1971)

work page 1971

[3] [1]

Abdelwahab, E

H. Abdelwahab, E. Barreiro, A. J. Calder´ on, and A. F. Ouaridi: The classification of nilpotent Lie-Yamaguti algebras , Linear Algebra and its Applications 654, 339–378 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [3]

A. L. Agore: Functors between representation categories. Universal modules, Linear Algebra and its Applications 688, 104–119 (2024)

work page 2024

[5] [4]

Benito, C

P. Benito, C. Draper, and A. Elduque: Lie Yamaguti algebra related to g2, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202, 22–54 (2005)

work page 2005

[6] [5]

Benito, A

P. Benito, A. Elduque, and F. Mart ´ ın-Herce:Irreducible Lie–Yamaguti algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213, 795–808 (2009)

work page 2009

[7] [6]

Goswami, S

S. Goswami, S. K. Mishra, and G. Mukherjee: Automorphisms of extensions of Lie-Yamaguti algebras and inducibility problem , Journal of Algebra 641, 268–306 (2024). UNIVERSAL COACTING HOPF ALGEBRA OF A FINITE DIMENSIONAL LIE-YAMAGUTI ALGEBRA 25

work page 2024

[8] [7]

S. Guo, B. Mondal, and R. Saha: On equivariant Lie–Yamaguti algebras and related structures , Asian-European Journal of Mathematics 16, Issue 2 (2023)

work page 2023