Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Janus correlators and Heun's equation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a probe scalar in the three-dimensional Janus interface is governed by Heun's equation, and uses its connection coefficients to extract the defect operator spectrum and BOPE coefficients to second order in the Janus…

desk verdict New analytic BOPE data for the Janus interface, built on a solid Heun-equation calculation; the residue extraction at large ξ involves an unproven contour step that should be tightened before the O(cJ²) spectrum is taken as settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01766 v2 pith:RWFS2OHC submitted 2025-06-02 hep-th

Michael Gutperle , Christina Yeo This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords JanussolutionHeun'sequationAdS/CFTcorrespondenceinterfaceCFTbulk-boundaryoperatorproductexpansionconnectioncoefficientsprobescalardefectspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper computes the two-point correlation functions of a massive probe scalar moving in the three-dimensional Janus solution, a holographic model of a conformal interface between two CFTs. It shows that the scalar's equation of motion is exactly Heun's equation, and uses recently derived connection coefficients for Heun functions to write the correlators as spectral integrals over the AdS$_2$ Laplacian. From these integrals the paper extracts the dimensions of the boundary operators that appear in the bulk-boundary operator product expansion and the associated BOPE coefficients, to second order in the Janus deformation parameter $c_J$. The result gives a direct route from a solved ODE to the interface data of a holographic defect.

What carries the argument

The central object is Heun's equation in normal form, $\rho''_s(y)+T(y)\rho_s(y)=0$, a second-order Fuchsian ODE with four regular singular points at $y=0,1,\infty,t$, obtained from the probe scalar equation of motion through the rescaling (4.1). The connection coefficients $C_{\epsilon\epsilon'}$ relating the Frobenius solutions at the two AdS boundaries are computed from the semiclassical Virasoro conformal blocks via formula (4.15), with the internal momentum $\sigma$ fixed by the accessory-parameter relation (4.12). These coefficients do the load-bearing work: ratios of $C$'s enter the Wronskian-constructed bulk-boundary propagator, and the poles of the gamma functions in the $s$-plane of the connection formula become the boundary operator dimensions, while their residues become the BOPE coefficients.

What would settle it

Evaluate the exact spectral integral (5.23) numerically at finite $c_J$ and large but finite $\xi$, and compare it term-by-term with the BOPE sum (5.30) using $\hat{\Delta}_n$ and residues from (5.28)--(5.33); a mismatch at order $c_J^2$ would show the pole extraction is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the two-point functions of the probe scalar in the Janus background admit exact integral representations in terms of the connection coefficients of Heun's equation, and that the large-$\xi$ (operators near the defect) limit of these integrals is captured by a bulk-boundary OPE. The pole positions of the integrand give the defect operator spectrum $\hat{\Delta}_n = \frac{1}{2} + i s_n$, where $s_n$ is shifted from its undeformed value by a term of order $c_J^2$ (equation (5.28)); the residues give the BOPE coefficients in (5.31)--(5.33). For $c_J=0$ the integral representations reduce to the standard AdS$_3$ two-point function of a primary of weight $\Delta_+$, which serves as a consistency check.

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes that, when the operators are brought close to the defect, the exact integral over the spectral parameter can be evaluated by keeping only a specific set of poles, and that the small-$c_J$ expansion used for the pole positions remains valid there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-point functions (5.23)--(5.26) give exact spectral integral representations for all same-side and cross-side probe correlators in the Janus interface, not just a perturbative expansion.
  • The defect operator spectrum is $\hat{\Delta}_n = \frac{1}{2} + i s_n$ with $s_n$ given by (5.28), so the leading correction from the Janus deformation is quadratic in $c_J$ and depends on the probe mass through $\Delta_-$.
  • The BOPE coefficients satisfy the consistency relation $(b^{OL}_{O\hat{O}_n})^2\,(b^{OR}_{O\hat{O}_n})^2 = \bigl(b^{OL}_{O\hat{O}_n} b^{OR}_{O\hat{O}_n}\bigr)^2$, so the same-side and cross-side data are not independent.
  • Setting $c_J=0$ reproduces the pure AdS$_3$ two-point function in the $H_2$ slicing, confirming the method on the trivial defect.
  • Higher-order corrections in $c_J$ are in principle accessible from higher-order terms of the semiclassical conformal block expansion, though the paper does not present them because the expressions become unwieldy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Heun-connection machinery should apply to other $H_2$-sliced interface geometries in gauged supergravity, as long as the linearized probe equation remains of Heun type; the paper notes that extra couplings could change the equation.
  • For wormholes formed by quotienting $H_2$ by a Fuchsian group, the spectral integrals would become discrete sums over the Laplacian spectrum, giving defect data as sums over that spectrum; this path is mentioned but not developed.
  • The exact integral representations could be used to test interface-CFT inequalities, such as reflection/transmission or effective central charge bounds, by probing correlators away from the BOPE limit; this is an extension the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes two-point correlation functions of a massive probe scalar in the three-dimensional Janus background by mapping the scalar equation of motion to Heun's equation and using the recently derived Trieste connection formula. The authors obtain integral representations for the same-side and cross-side correlators in terms of the H2 spectral parameter s, verify that the cJ=0 limit reproduces the exact AdS3 two-point function, and then extract the defect operator spectrum and bulk-boundary OPE (BOPE) coefficients at order cJ^2 by evaluating the spectral integrals through a residue calculation. The main results are the shifted defect dimensions Δ̂_n = 1/2 + i s_n with s_n given in (5.28) and the BOPE coefficients (5.31)-(5.33).

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the paper gives a new holographic application of Heun connection formulae and provides the first explicit BOPE data for a scalar probe in the Janus interface, including a nontrivial order-cJ^2 shift of the boundary operator dimensions. The paper has several genuine strengths: the connection coefficients are imported from independent literature rather than fitted; the cJ=0 limit is checked exactly against the known AdS3 two-point function; the BOPE coefficients satisfy the internal consistency relation (5.31)x(5.32) = (5.33)^2; and Appendix E checks the Trieste formula against the Schäfke-Schmidt formula to first order. The central limitation is that the residue extraction in Section 5.2 rests on unproven analytic-continuation and small-cJ interchange steps, and the cJ=0 check does not exercise those steps because it uses a different evaluation method.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.26)] The evaluation of the ξ→∞ limit by residues requires several analytic-continuation steps that are not justified. The paper replaces the integral over s∈[0,∞) in (5.20) with the integrals (5.23)-(5.26) over the full real line and then closes the contour in the lower half-plane. This contour deformation must cross the branch cuts and pole loci of the full integrand, including the factors cos(πσ), e^{-∂θW}, Γ(3/2-Δ-±σ), and the Γ(-2is) prefactor introduced by the hypergeometric transformation (5.22). The assertion after (5.26) that only the Γ(3/2-Δ-±σ) poles contribute is nontrivial, especially because Γ(-2is) has its own poles in the lower half-plane. No uniform estimate for the ξ→∞ limit or demonstration that all other pole/branch-cut contributions cancel is given. Since the cJ=0 check in §5.1 is performed with Kontorovich-Lebedev integrals rather than the residue method, it does not validate this step, and the central result (5.28)-(5.29) is therefore not established as it stands.
  2. [§5.2, Eqs. (4.16) and (5.27)-(5.28)] The inversion of the relation (4.16) to obtain the shifted pole locations (5.28) assumes that the small-cJ expansion of σ(s) remains valid at the complex pole positions s_n = -i(3/2+n-Δ-) + O(cJ^2), where |Im s| grows with n, and that after substituting the full σ(s) no additional solutions of σ(s)=3/2-Δ-+n enter the chosen contour. No remainder estimate for (4.16) is provided, and the expansion is derived for real s in the original spectral integral. A numerical evaluation of the original integral (5.20) for small cJ would provide a concrete check of (5.28); in the absence of such a check or an analytic error bound, the claimed spectral shift is not fully supported.
  3. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.31)-(5.33)] The residue evaluation leading to the BOPE coefficients is only sketched. For a pole of Γ(3/2-Δ--σ) at a shifted location, the residue involves (dσ/ds)^{-1} evaluated at s=s_n, but this derivative is not displayed. In addition, W(t) and its θ-derivatives in (5.31)-(5.33) are functions of σ(s) and t(cJ), and the paper does not show that the truncation of W to order 1/t^2 together with the σ expansion is sufficient for the claimed O(cJ^2) accuracy of the BOPE coefficients. While the product relation among (5.31)-(5.33) is a useful internal consistency check, it does not test whether the omitted residue contributions or truncation errors are absent.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.2, after Eq. (5.30)] The text says the sum is over boundary operators labeled by positive integers n, but the pole family (5.27) starts at n=0; the range should be stated as n=0,1,2,... or the labeling adjusted.
  2. [§5.1, after Eq. (5.16)] The phrase 'can by computed' is a typo and should read 'can be computed'.
  3. [Appendix A.1] The statement that the eigenvalues lie in '[-∞, -1/4]' should be written as '(-∞, -1/4]' or '≤ -1/4' to avoid the misleading inclusion of -∞.
  4. [§4 and Appendix B] The symbol W is used both for the classical Virasoro block in (4.10) and for the Wronskian in (B.1); this overloading is confusing and should be resolved, for example by using a different symbol for the Wronskian.
  5. [§4.2, Eq. (4.16)] The sentence introducing (4.16) says the expansion is 'to second order in cJ,' but the expression contains no O(cJ) term; it would be clearer to state explicitly that the first correction is O(cJ^2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Janus-deformation shift in the defect-operator spectrum and the BOPE coefficients are derived, not fitted, from external Heun connection formulas.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained against an external benchmark and does not promote a fitted quantity to a prediction. The two-point functions in (5.9) are written exactly in terms of the Heun connection coefficients C_{++}, C_{--} and C_{+-}. Those coefficients are imported from independent sources: the Trieste formula of Bonelli-Iossa-Panea Lichtig-Tanzini [25], the Schäfke-Schmidt formula of Lisovyy-Naidiuk [26], and related semiclassical-block work [17,58]; none of these shares authors with the present paper. The c_J = 0 limit is evaluated in Section 5.1 and reproduces the standard AdS_3 two-point function of a primary of weight Delta_+, which is an external check. For c_J not zero, the spectrum Delta_hat_n = 1/2 + i s_n follows by locating the poles of Gamma(3/2 - Delta_- - sigma(s)) in the exact spectral integrals and solving the sigma-Zamolodchikov relation (4.16) for the shifted pole positions (5.28); no coefficient is fitted to the resulting BOPE data. The consistency relation noted after (5.33) is an algebraic identity among the residue formulas, not an independent prediction. The Janus background is cited to the authors' earlier work [30,45], but the metric and scalar profile are written explicitly in (2.3)-(2.4) and stated to satisfy the equations of motion directly, so that citation is not load-bearing. Possible worries about closing the s-contour across branch cuts when applying (5.22)-(5.26), or about inverting the small-c_J expansion (4.16) at complex pole positions, are analytic-justification concerns rather than circularity: they do not make the output equivalent to the input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation contributes an analytic prediction but rests on prior mathematical results (Heun connection formula, Zamolodchikov relation) and on analytic-continuation assumptions about the spectral integral. No numbers are fitted to data; the only inputs are the Janus parameter c_J, the scalar mass (via Delta), and standard holographic dictionary.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Heun connection formula (4.15) and the semiclassical conformal block expansion (4.10)-(4.11) are correct as imported from [25,26,58].
    Central input for the two-point functions; the paper checks first-order agreement with the Schaeffke-Schmidt formula in Appendix E and cites [73] for all orders, but does not rederive the formula.
  • standard math Zamolodchikov relation t dW/dt = chi (4.12) connects the Heun accessory parameter to the classical Virasoro block and determines sigma through (4.13)-(4.16).
    Used to translate the spectral parameter s into the Liouville momentum sigma; assumed valid in the semiclassical limit b to 0.
  • domain assumption The probe scalar is free and does not backreact on the Janus geometry (Section 3).
    Needed so the two-point functions are computed from the free quadratic action (3.1); backreaction and self-couplings are neglected by design.
  • domain assumption The conformal dimension Delta is generic, so Delta_+ - Delta_- is not an integer and no logarithmic terms appear in (3.6).
    Stated after Eq. (3.6) and again in the Discussion; the logarithmic cases are deferred to future work.
  • ad hoc to paper The xi to infinity limit can be interchanged with the spectral integral, and only the poles of Gamma(3/2 - Delta_- - sigma) contribute to the BOPE.
    No convergence or uniformity argument is given in Section 5.2; this is the main analytic-continuation assumption behind the spectrum and BOPE coefficients.
  • domain assumption The contour is closed in the lower half-plane because boundary operator dimensions must satisfy Delta_hat >= 0 for a unitary CFT.
    Used in Section 5.2 to select the pole sequence (5.27) and discard the other term in (5.22).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Janus correlators and Heun's equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RWFS2OHC

@misc{pith2026250601766,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Janus correlators and Heun's equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RWFS2OHC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01766}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper we calculate two-point correlation functions of a massive probe scalar field in the background of the three-dimensional Janus solution. We relate the equation of motion of the scalar to Heun's equation and use the recently obtained expressions for the connection coefficients to obtain the two-point function of operators dual to the probe scalar. From the correlators we obtain the corrections to the spectrum of boundary operators and bulk-boundary operator product coefficients to second order in the Janus deformation parameter.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Heun,Zur theorie der riemann’schen functionen zweiter ordnung mit vier verzweigungspunkten, Mathematische Annalen 33 (1888) 161

    K. Heun,Zur theorie der riemann’schen functionen zweiter ordnung mit vier verzweigungspunkten, Mathematische Annalen 33 (1888) 161

    work page

  2. [2]

    Ronveaux,Heun’s Differential Equations, Oxford University Press (10, 1995), 10.1093/oso/9780198596950.001.0001

    A. Ronveaux,Heun’s Differential Equations, Oxford University Press (10, 1995), 10.1093/oso/9780198596950.001.0001

    arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Hortacsu,Heun Functions and Some of Their Applications in Physics, 1101.0471

    M. Hortacsu,Heun Functions and Some of Their Applications in Physics, 1101.0471

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Fiziev,The Heun functions as a modern powerful tool for research in different scientific domains, arXiv e-prints (2015) arXiv:1512.04025 [1512.04025]

    P.P. Fiziev,The Heun functions as a modern powerful tool for research in different scientific domains, arXiv e-prints (2015) arXiv:1512.04025 [1512.04025]

    arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Alday, D

    L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa,Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys.91 (2010) 167 [0906.3219]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Alday, D

    L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, S. Gukov, Y. Tachikawa and H. Verlinde,Loop and surface operators in N=2 gauge theory and Liouville modular geometry, JHEP 01 (2010) 113 [0909.0945]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Awata, H

    H. Awata, H. Fuji, H. Kanno, M. Manabe and Y. Yamada,Localization with a Surface Operator, Irregular Conformal Blocks and Open Topological String, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.16 (2012) 725 [1008.0574]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov,Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions, Prog. Math.244 (2006) 525 [hep-th/0306238]

    arXiv 2006

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Gaiotto,Asymptotically free N = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks, J

    D. Gaiotto,Asymptotically free N = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 462 (2013) 012014 [0908.0307]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda,Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory, Annales Henri Poincare23 (2022) 1951 [2006.06111]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D.P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 044047 [2105.04483]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Noda and H

    S. Noda and H. Motohashi,Spectroscopy of Kerr-AdS5 spacetime with the Heun function: Quasinormal modes, greybody factor, and evaporation, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 064025 [2206.07721]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge, 1303.6955

    T. Hartman,Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge, 1303.6955

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Fitzpatrick, J

    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M.T. Walters,Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap, JHEP 08 (2014) 145 [1403.6829]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bhatta and T

    A. Bhatta and T. Mandal,Exact thermal correlators of holographic CFTs, JHEP 02 (2023) 222 [2211.02449]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    He and Y

    S. He and Y. Li,Holographic Euclidean thermal correlator, JHEP 03 (2024) 024 [2308.13518]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Jia and M

    H.F. Jia and M. Rangamani,Holographic thermal correlators and quasinormal modes from semiclassical virasoro blocks, 2408.05208

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Barragán Amado, K

    J. Barragán Amado, K. Kwon and B. Gwak,Absorption cross section in gravity’s rainbow from confluent Heun equation, Class. Quant. Grav.41 (2024) 035005 [2307.12824]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dodelson, A

    M. Dodelson, A. Grassi, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Zhiboedov,Holographic thermal correlators from supersymmetric instantons, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 116 [2206.07720]. – 26 –

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bautista, G

    Y.F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini and Z. Zhou,Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 084071 [2312.05965]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Arnaudo and B

    P. Arnaudo and B. Withers,Exact low-temperature Green’s functions in AdS/CFT: From Heun to confluent Heun, 2412.01923

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Couch,Reduction of singularities in Fuchsian equations, and Heun equations for perturbations of Kerr–Newman–de Sitter and anti-de sitter spacetimes, J

    W.E. Couch,Reduction of singularities in Fuchsian equations, and Heun equations for perturbations of Kerr–Newman–de Sitter and anti-de sitter spacetimes, J. Math. Phys.66 (2025) 012502

    2025

  15. [23]

    Zamolodchikov,Two-dimensional conformal symmetry and critical four-spin correlation functions in the Ashkin-Teller model, Sov

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Two-dimensional conformal symmetry and critical four-spin correlation functions in the Ashkin-Teller model, Sov. Phys. - JETP63 (1986) 1061

    1986

  16. [24]

    Litvinov, S

    A. Litvinov, S. Lukyanov, N. Nekrasov and A. Zamolodchikov,Classical Conformal Blocks and Painleve VI, JHEP 07 (2014) 144 [1309.4700]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection Formulae for Heun Functions, Commun. Math. Phys.397 (2023) 635 [2201.04491]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Lisovyy and A

    O. Lisovyy and A. Naidiuk,Perturbative connection formulas for Heun equations, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 434005 [2208.01604]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    da Cunha and J.a.P

    B.C. da Cunha and J.a.P. Cavalcante,Expansions for semiclassical conformal blocks, JHEP 08 (2024) 110 [2211.03551]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Desiraju, P

    H. Desiraju, P. Ghosal and A. Prokhorov,Proof of Zamolodchikov conjecture for semi-classical conformal blocks on the torus, 2407.05839

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Iossa,Heun Connection Formulae from Liouville Correlators, Ph.D

    C. Iossa,Heun Connection Formulae from Liouville Correlators, Ph.D. thesis, SISSA, Italy, SISSA, Trieste, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano,A Dilatonic deformation of AdS(5) and its field theory dual, JHEP 05 (2003) 072 [hep-th/0304129]

    2003 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Clark and A

    A. Clark and A. Karch,Super Janus, JHEP 10 (2005) 094 [hep-th/0506265]

    2005 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bobev, K

    N. Bobev, K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,Supersymmetric Janus Solutions in Four Dimensions, JHEP 06 (2014) 058 [1311.4883]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Suh,Supersymmetric Janus solutions in five and ten dimensions, JHEP 09 (2011) 064 [1107.2796]

    M. Suh,Supersymmetric Janus solutions in five and ten dimensions, JHEP 09 (2011) 064 [1107.2796]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Karndumri,Supersymmetric Janus solutions in four-dimensional N=3 gauged supergravity, Phys

    P. Karndumri,Supersymmetric Janus solutions in four-dimensional N=3 gauged supergravity, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 125012 [1604.06007]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Chen and M

    K. Chen and M. Gutperle,Janus solutions in three-dimensionalN = 8 gauged supergravity, JHEP 05 (2021) 008 [2011.10154]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chiodaroli, M

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gutperle and D. Krym,Half-BPS Solutions locally asymptotic to AdS(3) x S**3 and interface conformal field theories, JHEP 02 (2010) 066 [0910.0466]

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Chiodaroli, M

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gutperle and L.-Y. Hung,Boundary entropy of supersymmetric Janus solutions, JHEP 09 (2010) 082 [1005.4433]

    2010 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Gutperle, J

    M. Gutperle, J. Kaidi and H. Raj,Janus solutions in six-dimensional gauged supergravity, JHEP 12 (2017) 018 [1709.09204]. – 27 –

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    D’Hoker, J

    E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle,Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. II. Flux solutions and multi-Janus, JHEP 06 (2007) 022 [0705.0024]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [40]

    D’Hoker, J

    E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle,Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. I. Local solution and supersymmetric Janus, JHEP 06 (2007) 021 [0705.0022]

    2007 arXiv

  33. [41]

    D’Hoker, J

    E. D’Hoker, J. Estes, M. Gutperle and D. Krym,Janus solutions in M-theory, JHEP 06 (2009) 018 [0904.3313]

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Clark, D.Z

    A.B. Clark, D.Z. Freedman, A. Karch and M. Schnabl,Dual of the Janus solution: An interface conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 066003 [hep-th/0407073]

    2005 arXiv

  35. [43]

    D’Hoker, J

    E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle,Interface Yang-Mills, supersymmetry, and Janus, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 16 [hep-th/0603013]

    2006 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, JHEP 06 (2010) 097 [0804.2907]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    D. Bak, M. Gutperle and S. Hirano,Three dimensional Janus and time-dependent black holes, JHEP 02 (2007) 068 [hep-th/0701108]

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Freedman, C

    D.Z. Freedman, C. Nunez, M. Schnabl and K. Skenderis,Fake supergravity and domain wall stability, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 104027 [hep-th/0312055]

    2004 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bachas, J

    C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf and H. Ooguri,Permeable conformal walls and holography, JHEP 06 (2002) 027 [hep-th/0111210]

    2002 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Gutperle and J

    M. Gutperle and J. Samani,Holographic RG-flows and Boundary CFTs, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 106007 [1207.7325]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Breitenlohner and D.Z

    P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman,Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity, Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249

    1982

  42. [50]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 556 (1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104]

    1999 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Melby-Thompson and C

    C. Melby-Thompson and C. Schmidt-Colinet,Double Trace Interfaces, JHEP 11 (2017) 110 [1707.03418]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bianchi, D.Z

    M. Bianchi, D.Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis,Holographic renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 631 (2002) 159 [hep-th/0112119]

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kraus, F

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink,The gravitational action in asymptotically AdS and flat space-times, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 259 [hep-th/9906127]

    1999 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav.19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  47. [55]

    McAvity and H

    D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn,Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 522 [cond-mat/9505127]

    1995 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Billò, V

    M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri,Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP 04 (2016) 091 [1601.02883]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Liendo, L

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees,The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFTd, JHEP 07 (2013) 113 [1210.4258]. – 28 –

    2013 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Consoli, F

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and R. Poghossian,CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses, JHEP 12 (2022) 115 [2206.09437]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Ferrari and M

    F. Ferrari and M. Piatek,Liouville theory, N=2 gauge theories and accessory parameters, JHEP 05 (2012) 025 [1202.2149]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Beşken, S

    M. Beşken, S. Datta and P. Kraus,Semi-classical virasoro blocks: proof of exponentiation, Journal of High Energy Physics2020 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Piatek, R.G

    M.R. Piatek, R.G. Nazmitdinov, A. Puente and A.R. Pietrykowski,Classical conformal blocks, Coulomb gas integrals and Richardson-Gaudin models, JHEP 04 (2022) 098 [2110.15009]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bateman,Tables of integral transforms, vol

    H. Bateman,Tables of integral transforms, vol. 2, McGraw-Hill (1954)

    1954

  55. [63]

    Bateman,Tables of integral transforms, vol

    H. Bateman,Tables of integral transforms, vol. 1, McGraw-Hill (1954)

    1954

  56. [64]

    Nicolai and H

    H. Nicolai and H. Samtleben,N=8 matter coupled AdS(3) supergravities, Phys. Lett. B514 (2001) 165 [hep-th/0106153]

    2001 arXiv

  57. [65]

    K. Chen, M. Gutperle and C. Hultgreen-Mena,Janus and RG-flow interfaces in three-dimensional gauged supergravity, JHEP 03 (2022) 057 [2111.01839]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gutperle and C

    M. Gutperle and C. Hultgreen-Mena,Janus and RG interfaces in three-dimensional gauged supergravity. Part II. Generalα, JHEP 08 (2022) 126 [2205.10398]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Karch, Y

    A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun and M. Wang,Universality of effective central charge in interface CFTs, JHEP 11 (2023) 126 [2308.05436]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Karch, Y

    A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun and M. Wang,Universal Bound on Effective Central Charge and Its Saturation, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 091604 [2404.01515]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    S.A. Baig, A. Karch and M. Wang,Transmission coefficient of super-Janus solution, JHEP 10 (2024) 235 [2408.00059]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    The laplacian and its eigenfunctions on lobachevskii space

    M. Stone, “The laplacian and its eigenfunctions on lobachevskii space.”

  63. [71]

    Chiodaroli, J

    M. Chiodaroli, J. Estes and Y. Korovin,Holographic two-point functions for janus interfaces in the d1/d5 cft, Journal of High Energy Physics2017 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.” https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.3 of 2024-12-15

    2024

  65. [73]

    Ren and Z

    J. Ren and Z. Yu,Holographic thermal correlators from recursions, 2412.02608. – 29 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.