Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Discovery of the Type-II Superconductor Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_{1-\delta}$ with a High Upper Critical Field

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that Ta4Rh2C1−δ, a previously unknown cubic eta-carbide compound, is a bulk type-II superconductor with Tc = 6.4 K and zero-temperature upper critical field μ0Hc2(0) = 17.4 T, above the BCS weak-coupling Pauli limit of…

desk verdict A genuinely new η-carbide superconductor with solid bulk characterization; the Pauli-limit-violating Hc2(0) is plausible but rests on an extrapolation that needs a caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02209 v1 pith:OB5QAN64 submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.supr-con

KeYuan Ma , Sara López-Paz , Karolina Gornicka , Harald O. Jeschke , Tomasz Klimczuk , Fabian O. von Rohr This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductivityuppercriticalfieldPauliparamagneticlimiteta-carbidestructureTa4Rh2C1−δtype-IIsuperconductorspecificheatdensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ta4Rh2C1−δ is a previously unknown compound in the Ta–Rh–C system, synthesized by arc-melting and annealing. The paper establishes that it is a bulk type-II superconductor with Tc = 6.4 K (resistivity, 50% criterion), a specific-heat jump ΔC/γTc = 1.56 close to the BCS value, and a lower critical field of about 20 mT. Its central result is a high upper critical field: using the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg dirty-limit formalism, the zero-temperature Hc2(0) is estimated at 17.4 T, which exceeds the weak-coupling Pauli paramagnetic limit of 11.9 T. The authors argue this is remarkable because Ta4Rh2C1−δ is cubic and centrosymmetric, unlike most Pauli-limit-violating Ta-based superconductors, and it is isostructural and isoelectronic to the sister compound Nb4Rh2C1−δ.

What carries the argument

The argument's load-bearing object is the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg (WHH) dirty-limit expression for the upper critical field, Hc2(T) = (μ0Hc2(0)/0.693) h*_fit(t), with h*_fit(t) = (1−t) − C1(1−t)^2 − C2(1−t)^4 and constants C1 = 0.153, C2 = 0.152. This phenomenological form lets the authors extrapolate from resistivity and specific-heat data measured only up to 9 T to a zero-temperature field of 17.4 T, and the comparison of that value with the BCS Pauli limit μ0HPauli ≈ 1.86[T/K]·Tc carries the central claim. The eta-carbide crystal structure with its tetrahedral Ta1/Rh network and Ta2 octahedra provides the material context and connects this compound to the Nb4Rh2C1−δ family.

What would settle it

Measure Hc2(T) directly in fields up to at least 18 T on a phase-pure or single-crystal sample: if the measured zero-temperature upper critical field falls at or below the Pauli limit (about 11.9 T), or if the Hc2(T) curve deviates strongly from the WHH dirty-limit form, the claimed Pauli-limit violation would not hold. A simpler check is whether the zero-field specific-heat jump and resistivity transition remain sharp at fields above 9 T, as the extrapolation assumes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper discovers superconductivity in the eta-carbide Ta4Rh2C1−δ and reports that its upper critical field is remarkably high. Magnetization, resistivity, and specific heat all show a bulk superconducting transition near 6.4 K. Fitting Hc2(T) with the WHH dirty-limit expression yields zero-temperature values of 19.3 T, 17.4 T, 16.9 T, and 17.7 T from the 10%, 50%, and 90% resistivity criteria and the specific-heat data, respectively; all exceed the corresponding BCS weak-coupling Pauli limits, with the 50%-criterion value of 17.4 T compared with 11.9 T. The paper further characterizes the superconducting state as extreme type-II with κGL ≈ 40, coherence length 43.5 Å, and penetration depth 1743 Å, and supports a moderate electron–phonon coupling picture with λep = 0.71. Its electronic-structure calculations reproduce the measured density of states and show stronger spin-orbit splitting in Ta4Rh2C than in Nb4Rh2C.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on assuming the WHH dirty-limit formula with its standard constants describes this polycrystalline sample, and on extrapolating data taken only up to 9 T to a zero-temperature value of 17.4 T.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claimed Hc2(0) is correct, Ta4Rh2C1−δ becomes the second eta-carbide compound in the Nb/Ta sister pair, showing that the high-field behavior is robust across 4d to 5d substitution.
  • It demonstrates that the Pauli paramagnetic limit can be exceeded in a cubic centrosymmetric superconductor, so any theory of the violation must allow isotropic, centrosymmetric pairing.
  • The material's high upper critical field and moderate Tc make it a candidate for high-field superconducting wires, if phase-pure or single-crystal samples can be prepared.
  • The agreement between measured and calculated density of states supports a conventional electron–phonon mechanism, meaning the high Hc2 cannot be attributed to strong-coupling renormalization alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test would be to extend resistivity and specific-heat measurements to 15–20 T; if Hc2(T) saturates below the WHH extrapolation, the dirty-limit assumption would need revision.
  • Given the FFLO-type signatures reported in the isostructural Ti4Ir2O, Ta4Rh2C1−δ is a plausible candidate for low-temperature high-field phases; a pulsed-field or high-field study above 9 T could look for such a state.
  • The observed carbon deficiency δ ≈ 0.15 shifts the Fermi level; a systematic study varying δ could test whether Tc and Hc2 scale with carrier concentration in this structure.
  • Because Ta is heavier than Nb, the stronger spin-orbit coupling in Ta4Rh2C suggests a possible route to tune Pauli-limit violation by 5d substitution in other eta-carbides.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis, crystal structure, and superconducting properties of a previously unreported \eta-carbide compound, Ta4Rh2C1-delta. Powder X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement gives a cubic cell parameter a = 11.7947(1) Angstrom and indicates a 96.5% main phase with 3.5% Ta2O5 impurity. Magnetic susceptibility, electrical resistivity, and specific heat measurements show a bulk superconducting transition with Tc about 6.4 K by the 50% resistivity criterion and a specific heat jump DeltaC/gammaTc = 1.56. From field-dependent resistivity and specific heat data up to 9 T, the authors quote a zero-temperature upper critical field mu0Hc2(0) = 17.4 T using a Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg dirty-limit fit, which exceeds the BCS weak-coupling Pauli limit of 11.9 T. DFT calculations give a density of states at the Fermi level of 5.45 states eV-1 f.u.-1 for delta = 0.15, close to the value 5.23 states eV-1 f.u.-1 derived from the measured Sommerfeld coefficient.

Significance. The bulk superconducting state of Ta4Rh2C1-delta is well supported: three independent probes give consistent transitions, the specific heat jump is close to the BCS weak-coupling value, and the comparison with isostructural Nb4Rh2C1-delta is instructive. If the high-field extrapolation is correct, the compound would be a new cubic centrosymmetric superconductor with a Pauli-limit-violating upper critical field, which would be significant for the ongoing search for such materials. The circularity concern raised in the stress-test does not land: the Hc2 extraction uses an external WHH model and the DFT comparison uses a fixed assumed delta rather than a tuned parameter. However, the headline Pauli-limit-violation claim rests on an extrapolation from 9 T data, and the carbon stoichiometry is assumed rather than measured; both points need to be addressed before the strongest claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [III.C, Eqs. (6)-(7), Fig. 3(a)] The central quantitative claim, that mu0Hc2(0) = 17.4 T exceeds the Pauli limit of 11.9 T, is not directly measured. The field-dependent resistivity and specific heat data in Figs. 2(b)-(c) and Fig. 3(a) extend only to 9 T, where Tc is suppressed to 3.9 K (reduced temperature t approximately 0.61), and the zero-temperature value is obtained by extrapolating the WHH dirty-limit expression with literature constants C1 = 0.153 and C2 = 0.152 and no Pauli-paramagnetic term. Because the same functional form is applied to all four criteria, the statement that all criteria exceed the Pauli limit does not provide independent validation. The alternative GL fits mentioned in the text give even larger values, and a downward curvature or saturation near the Pauli limit below 3.9 K cannot be excluded from the available data. The paper should explicitly state that the quoted Hc2(0) is an extrapolated WHH value, and the Pauli-limit-violation claim should be softened unless higher-field measurements below 3.9 K are provided.
  2. [III.A, Table I, and III.E] The carbon stoichiometry is not experimentally determined. EDS cannot quantify carbon, the Rietveld refinement in Table I fixes the C occupancy at 1, and the text assumes negligible carbon loss during arc-melting to set delta close to 0.15. This assumed stoichiometry enters the compound formula Ta4Rh2C1-delta and the DFT comparison in Section III.E, where D(EF) = 5.45 states eV-1 f.u.-1 is computed for delta = 0.15 and compared with the calorimetric value 5.23. A combustion analysis or a refinement with the carbon occupancy as a free parameter would be needed to confirm the nominal composition; absent such data, the text should state clearly that the carbon content and therefore delta are assumed rather than measured.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section headings] The heading sequence is inconsistent: 'III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION' is immediately followed by 'IV. SYNTHESIS', and the subsections A-E appear to belong to Section III; the numbering should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'which is exceeding the BCS weak coupling Pauli limit' should be 'which exceeds the BCS weak-coupling Pauli limit'.
  3. [Fig. 3(b)] The figure legend uses 'Ta2Pd0.92S5' while the text and reference list use 'Ta2Pd0.92S6'; please unify the notation.
  4. [III.A] The phrase 'stella quadrangla' should read 'stella quadrangula'.
  5. [Eq. (4)] The choice of mu* = 0.13 is stated, but a one-sentence note on the sensitivity of the derived lambda_ep and D(EF) to this choice would help the reader judge the robustness of the comparison in Table II.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Tc, the bulk superconducting transition, and the specific-heat jump are directly measured, while the 17.4 T upper critical field comes from a one-parameter WHH fit with external fixed constants; self-citations are comparative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are anchored in direct measurements: Tc = 6.4 K (resistivity, 50% criterion) and Tc = 6.0 K (specific heat, entropy-conserving construction), the type-II character (ZFC/FC divergence in Figure 2a), and the bulk specific-heat jump ΔC/γTc = 1.56. The headline quantitative claim, μ0Hc2(0) = 17.4 T, is the free parameter of a Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg dirty-limit fit (Eqs. 6–7) whose functional form h*_fit(t) and constants C1 = 0.153 and C2 = 0.152 are taken from external sources (refs. 33 and 34); the fit inverts the measured Tc(H) points, and the Pauli limit (1.86 Tc = 11.9 T) is an independent external formula, so the 'exceeds Pauli limit' statement is not built into the comparison by construction. The DFT density-of-states check (5.45 vs. 5.23 states eV−1 f.u.−1) uses the nominal carbon deficiency δ = 0.15, not a value tuned to reproduce the measured γ, so the agreement is not an enforced identity; similarly the comparison with Nb4Rh2C1−δ uses the previously reported δ = 0.3 value, not one re-fitted here. Self-citations (refs. 7, 8, 19, and 47) supply comparative context and a precedent for applying the WHH fit to η-carbides, but the mathematical content of the fit is anchored in external references (33 and 34), so none of these citations is load-bearing. The legitimate weakness — the WHH extrapolation from data ending at 9 T (t ≈ 0.61) to T = 0, with no Pauli-paramagnetic term — is a model-appropriateness and extrapolation risk, not a circular reduction, and is properly scored as a correctness concern rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central superconducting transition is directly measured; the main extrapolative and compositional assumptions are listed above. The Pauli-limit comparison relies on the WHH dirty-limit model and on the assumed carbon content. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • carbon deficiency δ = 0.15 (nominal 0.85 carbon)
    C content is not directly measurable by EDS or XRD; the paper assumes negligible carbon loss during arc melting and uses δ = 0.15 for the chemical formula and for the DFT DOS comparison (Section III.A and III.E, Table I).
  • Coulomb pseudopotential μ* = 0.13
    Set to the common empirical value for NbRh2B2 and TaRh2B2 in the McMillan formula (Eq. 4); affects λep and D(EF), not the core Hc2 claim.
  • demagnetization factor N = 0.53
    Obtained by fitting low-field M(H) to a line; used to correct Hc1 from 9.4 to 20 mT (Section III.B).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Pauli paramagnetic limit μ0H_Pauli = 1.86 T/K × Tc applies to weak-coupling BCS superconductors and is the relevant benchmark.
    Used to conclude that Hc2(0) = 17.4 T exceeds the Pauli limit (Section III.C).
  • domain assumption The WHH dirty-limit formula with the phenomenological h*_fit(t) (Eqs. 6 and 7, C1 = 0.153, C2 = 0.152) describes the temperature dependence of Hc2 in this polycrystalline superconductor, allowing extrapolation beyond 9 T.
    The paper measures Tc(H) only up to 9 T and uses this model to obtain μ0Hc2(0); if the model is invalid, the reported Hc2(0) and Pauli-limit comparison would change (Section III.C, Figure 3a).
  • domain assumption The normal-state specific heat follows C/T = γ + βT^2 in the fitted range, so γ and β are cleanly separable.
    Used to extract γ = 20.9 mJ/mol K^2 and β = 0.707 mJ/mol K^4 (Section III.B, Eq. 2); an inaccurate phonon background would bias the specific heat jump.
  • domain assumption The carbon content in the sample equals the nominal composition, i.e., negligible carbon loss during arc melting.
    The paper assumes this because EDS cannot quantify carbon reliably and XRD is insensitive to light atoms; the assumed δ = 0.15 is used in the chemical formula and in the DFT DOS comparison (Section III.A).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of the Type-II Superconductor Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_{1-\delta}$ with a High Upper Critical Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OB5QAN64

@misc{pith2026250602209,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of the Type-II Superconductor Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_1-\delta$ with a High Upper Critical Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OB5QAN64}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02209}
}
abstract

We report on the discovery of superconductivity in the previously unknown compound Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_{1-\delta}$. Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_{1-\delta}$ crystallizes in the $\eta$-carbide structure type, in the cubic space group $Fd\bar{3}m$ (No.227) with a unit cell parameter of $a = $ 11.7947 \AA. Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility, resistivity, and specific heat capacity measurements reveal that Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_{1-\delta}$ is a type-II bulk superconductor with a critical temperature of $T_{\rm c}$ = 6.4 K, and a normalized specific heat jump $\Delta C/\gamma T_{\rm c}$ = 1.56. Notably, we find Ta$_4$Rh$_2$C$_{1-\delta}$ has a high upper critical field of $\mu_0 H_{\rm c2}{\rm (0)}$ = 17.4 T, which is exceeding the BCS weak coupling Pauli limit of $\mu_0 H_{\rm Pauli}$ = 11.9 T.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02209 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Rietveld refinements of the room temperature PXRD pattern of Ta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Superconducting properties of Ta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Upper critical field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electronic structure of Ta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Larbalestier and P

    D. Larbalestier and P. C. Canfield, Superconductivity at 100—where we’ve been and where we’re going, Mrs Bulletin36, 590 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    F. O. von Rohr, Chemical principles of intrinsic topological superconductors, Chemistry of Materials35, 9455 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Simon, Superconductivity and chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English36, 1788 (1997)

    A. Simon, Superconductivity and chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English36, 1788 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Santoro, F

    A. Santoro, F. Beech, M. Marezio, and R. Cava, Crystal chemistry of superconductors: A guide to the tailoring of new compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity156, 693 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    S. Hahn, K. Kim, K. Kim, X. Hu, T. Painter, I. Dixon, S. Kim, K. R. Bhattarai, S. Noguchi, J. Jaroszynski,et al., 45.5-tesla direct-current magnetic field generated with a high-temperature superconducting magnet, Nature570, 496 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity(Courier Corporation, 2004)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity(Courier Corporation, 2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    K. Ma, K. Gornicka, R. Lef` evre, Y. Yang, H. M. Rønnow, H. O. Jeschke, T. Klimczuk, and F. O. von Rohr, Superconductivity with high upper critical field in the cubic centrosymmetric η-carbide Nb 4Rh2C1 –δ, ACS Materials Au1, 55 (2021). 17

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    In the supporting information (S-Figure (9) and (10)), we present the calculated Fermi surface of Nb 4Rh2C1−δ withδ= 0, andδ= 0.15, respectively [23]

    [23]. In the supporting information (S-Figure (9) and (10)), we present the calculated Fermi surface of Nb 4Rh2C1−δ withδ= 0, andδ= 0.15, respectively [23]. V. CONCLUSION In summary, we have successfully synthesized a newη-carbide superconductor Ta4Rh2C1−δ by arc-melting followed by the high-temperature annealing method. Our X-ray diffraction measurements...

    work page 2022

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Watanabe, A

    Y. Watanabe, A. Miura, C. Moriyoshi, A. Yamashita, and Y. Mizuguchi, Observation of superconductivity and enhanced upper critical field ofη-carbide-type oxide Zr4Pd2O, Scientific Reports13, 22458 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    K. Ma, R. Lef` evre, K. Gornicka, H. O. Jeschke, X. Zhang, Z. Guguchia, T. Klimczuk, and F. O. von Rohr, Group-9 transition-metal suboxides adopting the filled-Ti 2Ni structure: A class of superconductors exhibiting exceptionally high upper critical fields, Chemistry of Materi...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Ku and D

    H. Ku and D. Johnston, New superconducting ternary transition metal compounds with the E93-type structure, Chinese Journal of Physics22, 59 (1984)

    1984

  4. [12]

    Kuo, The formation ofηcarbides, Acta metallurgica1, 301 (1953)

    K. Kuo, The formation ofηcarbides, Acta metallurgica1, 301 (1953)

    1953

  5. [13]

    Mackay, G

    R. Mackay, G. J. Miller, and H. F. Franzen, New oxides of the filled-Ti 2Ni type structure, Journal of alloys and compounds204, 109 (1994)

    1994

  6. [14]

    Gupta, D

    S. Gupta, D. J. Sordelet, and J. D. Corbett, Structural and compositional investigations of Zr4Pt2O: A filled-cubic Ti 2Ni-type phase, Journal of Solid State Chemistry182, 1708 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    T. J. Prior and P. D. Battle, Superparamagnetism and metal-site ordering in quaternary nitrides with theη-carbide structure, Journal of Materials Chemistry14, 3001 (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    T. Waki, Y. Umemoto, S. Terazawa, Y. Tabata, A. Kondo, K. Sato, K. Kindo, S. Alconchel, F. Sapina, Y. Takahashi,et al., Itinerant electron metamagnetism inη-carbide-type compound Co3Mo3C, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan79, 093703 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Taylor and K

    A. Taylor and K. Sachs, A new complex eta-carbide, Nature169, 411 (1952)

    1952

  10. [18]

    S. Cui, A. C. Mtukula, X. Bo, and L. Guo, High-efficiency Co 6W6C catalyst with three- dimensional ginger-like morphology for promoting the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reac- tions, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy45, 6404 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    D. Das, K. Ma, J. Jaroszynski, V. Sazgari, T. Klimczuk, F. O. von Rohr, and Z. Guguchia, Ti4Ir2O: A time reversal invariant fully gapped unconventional superconductor, Physical Re- view B110, 174507 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Ruan, M.-H

    B.-B. Ruan, M.-H. Zhou, Q.-S. Yang, Y.-D. Gu, M.-W. Ma, G.-F. Chen, and Z.-A. Ren, Superconductivity with a violation of pauli limit and evidences for multigap inη-carbide type Ti4Ir2O, Chinese Physics Letters39, 027401 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Koepernik and H

    K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band- structure scheme, Phys. Rev. B59, 1743 (1999)

    1999

  14. [22]

    We converge the calculations on 16×16×16kmeshes

    to account for the spin-orbit coupling effects in the electronic structure. We converge the calculations on 16×16×16kmeshes. 4 - Ta4Rh2C Fd3m a = 11.7947(1) Å a ac b b a c ba c b (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Ta 1 Ta 2 Rh C FIG. 1. (a) Rietveld refinements of the room temperature PXRD p...

  15. [23]

    Rodriguez-Cavajal, Recent developments of the program fullprof, Comm

    J. Rodriguez-Cavajal, Recent developments of the program fullprof, Comm. Powder Diffract. Newsl.26, 12 (2001). 18

    2001

  16. [24]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    See supplemental material for discovery of the type-II superconductor Ta 4Rh2C1 –δ with a high upper critical field at xxxxx, url-will-be-inserted-by-publisher (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Ku, Effect of composition on the superconductivity of the E9 3 phase in the ternary nb-rh-c system, Physica B+ C135, 417 (1985)

    H. Ku, Effect of composition on the superconductivity of the E9 3 phase in the ternary nb-rh-c system, Physica B+ C135, 417 (1985)

    1985

  19. [27]

    E. M. Carnicom, W. Xie, T. Klimczuk, J. Lin, K. G´ ornicka, Z. Sobczak, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, TaRh2B2 and NbRh 2B2: Superconductors with a chiral noncentrosymmetric crystal structure, Science advances4, eaar7969 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Naito, A

    M. Naito, A. Matsuda, K. Kitazawa, S. Kambe, I. Tanaka, and H. Kojima, Temperature dependence of anisotropic lower critical fields in (La 1 –x Srx )2 CuO4, Physical Review B41, 4823 (1990)

    1990

  21. [29]

    McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Physical Review 167, 331 (1968)

    W. McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Physical Review 167, 331 (1968)

    1968

  22. [30]

    von Rohr, M

    F. von Rohr, M. J. Winiarski, J. Tao, T. Klimczuk, and R. J. Cava, Effect of electron count and chemical complexity in the Ta – Nb – Hf – Zr – Ti high-entropy alloy superconductor, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, E7144 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    G´ ornicka, X

    K. G´ ornicka, X. Gui, B. Wiendlocha, L. T. Nguyen, W. Xie, R. J. Cava, and T. Klimczuk, NbIr2B2 and TaIr2B2–new low symmetry noncentrosymmetric superconductors with strong spin–orbit coupling, Advanced Functional Materials31, 2007960 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Gui and R

    X. Gui and R. J. Cava, LaIr3Ga2: A superconductor based on a kagome lattice of Ir, Chemistry of Materials34, 2824 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    L. Zeng, X. Hu, S. Guo, G. Lin, J. Song, K. Li, Y. He, Y. Huang, C. Zhang, P. Yu,et al., Ta4CoSi: A tantalum-rich superconductor with a honeycomb network structure, Physical Review B106, 134501 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Stolze, J

    K. Stolze, J. Tao, F. O. von Rohr, T. Kong, and R. J. Cava, Sc – Zr – Nb – Rh – Pd and Sc – Zr – Nb – Ta – Rh – Pd high-entropy alloy superconductors on a CsCl-type lattice, Chem- istry of Materials30, 906 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Helfand and N

    E. Helfand and N. Werthamer, Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting 19 critical field, Hc2. II, Physical Review147, 288 (1966)

    1966

  28. [36]

    Baumgartner, M

    T. Baumgartner, M. Eisterer, H. Weber, R. Fl¨ ukiger, C. Scheuerlein, and L. Bottura, Effects of neutron irradiation on pinning force scaling in state-of-the-art Nb3Sn wires, Superconductor Science and Technology27, 015005 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    L. C. Srivichitranond, E. M. Seibel, W. Xie, Z. Sobczak, T. Klimczuk, and R. J. Cava, Super- conductivity in a new intermetallic structure type based on endohedral Ta@Ir 7Ge4 clusters, Physical Review B95, 174521 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Jiao, L.-P

    W.-H. Jiao, L.-P. He, Y. Liu, X.-F. Xu, Y.-K. Li, C.-H. Zhang, N. Zhou, Z.-A. Xu, S.-Y. Li, and G.-H. Cao, Superconductivity in Ta 3Pd3Te14 with quasi-one-dimensional PdTe 2 chains, Scientific Reports6, 21628 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    C. Xu, B. Li, J. Feng, W. Jiao, Y. Li, S. Liu, Y. Zhou, R. Sankar, N. D. Zhigadlo, H. Wang, et al., Two-gap superconductivity and topological surface states in TaOsSi, Physical Review B100, 134503 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Z. Shi, S. Kuhn, F. Flicker, T. Helm, J. Lee, W. Steinhardt, S. Dissanayake, D. Graf, J. Ruff, G. Fabbris,et al., Incommensurate two-dimensional checkerboard charge density wave in the low-dimensional superconductor Ta4Pd3Te16, Physical Review Research2, 042042 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Shang, J

    T. Shang, J. Zhao, D. J. Gawryluk, M. Shi, M. Medarde, E. Pomjakushina, and T. Shiroka, Superconductivity and topological aspects of the rocksalt carbides NbC and TaC, Physical Review B101, 214518 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Klimczuk, S

    T. Klimczuk, S. Kr´ olak, and R. J. Cava, Superconductivity of Ta – Hf and Ta – Zr alloys: Po- tential alloys for use in superconducting devices, Physical Review Materials7, 064802 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Barker, B

    J. Barker, B. Breen, R. Hanson, A. Hillier, M. R. Lees, G. Balakrishnan, D. M. Paul, and R. Singh, Superconducting and normal-state properties of the noncentrosymmetric supercon- ductor Re3Ta, Physical Review B98, 104506 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    X. Gui, K. G´ ornicka, Q. Chen, H. Zhou, T. Klimczuk, and W. Xie, Superconductivity in metal-rich chalcogenide Ta2Se, Inorganic Chemistry59, 5798 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Y. Lu, T. Takayama, A. F. Bangura, Y. Katsura, D. Hashizume, and H. Takagi, Supercon- ductivity at 6 K and the violation of pauli limit in Ta 2Pdx S5, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan83, 023702 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    L. Yan, C. Ding, M. Li, R. Tang, W. Chen, B. Liu, K. Bu, T. Huang, D. Dai, X. Jin,et al., Modulating charge-density wave order and superconductivity from two alternative stacked 20 monolayers in a bulk 4H b-TaSe2 heterostructure via pressure, Nano Letters23, 2121 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    H. Liu, J. Yao, J. Shi, Z. Yang, D. Yan, Y. Li, D. Chen, H. L. Feng, S. Li, Z. Wang,et al., Vanadium-based superconductivity in the breathing kagome compound Ta2V3.1Si0.9, Physical Review B108, 104504 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Terashima, Y

    T. Terashima, Y. Tokumoto, K. Hamano, T. Konoike, N. Kikugawa, and K. Edagawa, Anoma- lous upper critical field in the quasicrystal superconductor Ta 1.6Te, npj Quantum Materials 9, 56 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    K. Ma, J. Lago, and F. O. von Rohr, Superconductivity in theη-carbide-type oxides Zr4Rh2Ox , Journal of Alloys and Compounds796, 287 (2019). 21

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.