Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 170 references

Application of convolutional neural networks in image super-resolution

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey organizes CNN-based image super-resolution methods into six upsampling families and compares their quality, speed, and complexity experimentally.

desk verdict A broad but uneven CNN-SR survey: the taxonomy is useful, the experimental tables are not reliable as printed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02604 v2 pith:GLEPS66W submitted 2025-06-03 cs.CV eess.IV

Chunwei Tian , Mingjian Song , Wangmeng Zuo , Bo Du , Yanning Zhang , Shichao Zhang This is my paper
classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords deeplearningconvolutionalneuralnetworksimagesuper-resolutionreconstructionrestorationbicubicinterpolationsub-pixelconvolutionmetaupsampling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that CNN-based image super-resolution methods can be understood through the upsampling operator they use, and it divides them into interpolation-based families (bicubic, nearest neighbor, bilinear) and module-based families (transposed convolution, sub-pixel layer, meta upsampling). For each family it explains the motivation, the network designs that exemplify it, and whether the method targets non-blind or blind super-resolution. It then compiles quantitative results from the literature, comparing PSNR, SSIM, parameter counts, and runtimes on standard datasets, and adds visual comparisons that favor the coarse-to-fine network CFSRCNN in texture recovery. The paper closes with open problems, including better perceptual metrics, multi-degradation robustness, self-supervision, and lightweight models for edge devices.

What carries the argument

The taxonomy itself is the central machinery: every surveyed method is classified first by upsampling family and then by whether it assumes a known degradation (non-blind) or estimates it (blind). The interpolation families are bicubic, nearest-neighbor, and bilinear; the module families are transposed convolution, sub-pixel layer, and meta upsampling, where meta upsampling dynamically generates filter weights for arbitrary scale factors. The accompanying quantitative tables (Tables 13-18), which report PSNR/SSIM, runtime, and parameter counts, carry the comparative argument by letting readers see which family wins on which axis.

What would settle it

Re-test the compared methods under identical training data, hardware, and evaluation protocol, or audit each entry in Tables 13-18 against the original papers; a material change in rankings, such as RCAN losing its ×3/×4 lead or CFSRCNN losing its speed lead, would refute the survey's comparative conclusions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the choice of upsampling mechanism is a primary organizing axis for CNN super-resolution: interpolating before the network, interpolating inside the network, or replacing interpolation with a learnable module changes both reconstruction quality and computational cost. By sorting dozens of methods into the six families and testing representative models, the survey establishes that no single approach dominates: residual channel attention (RCAN) leads quantitative quality at ×3 and ×4 on Set5/Set14/BSD100/Urban100, the dense network RDN leads at ×2, CFSRCNN offers the fastest runtime among tested models, and CARN-M is the most parameter-efficient. In blind super-resolution, degradation-aware networks (DASR) achieve the best reported PSNR on Set5. The survey thereby presents the field as a design space of upsampling choices rather than a linear progression of deeper networks.

Load-bearing premise

The comparative rankings depend on the numbers in Tables 13-18 being accurate, complete, and directly comparable, although the methods were originally evaluated with different training sets, hardware, and protocols and no error bars are reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners can match the upsampling family to the deployment constraint: CARN-M for low-parameter models, CFSRCNN for speed, RCAN or RDN for peak PSNR.
  • Blind super-resolution is treated as a separate design space in which kernel estimation and GAN-based training dominate, so future real-world SR work should build on degradation modeling rather than on fixed bicubic assumptions.
  • Meta upsampling modules make arbitrary-scale super-resolution possible with a single network, reducing the need to train separate models for each magnification factor.
  • The reported comparisons imply that deeper backbones alone do not settle the quality race; the upsampling operator and attention mechanism matter at least as much.
  • The survey's open-problem list, including robust perceptual metrics and multi-degradation handling, defines the next targets for the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A controlled ablation that fixes the backbone and varies only the upsampling operator would isolate how much of the PSNR gap comes from the upsampling choice, which the survey's taxonomy implicitly suggests but does not run.
  • Meta upsampling's flexibility points toward a unified model for unknown scale and degradation combinations, a direction the survey names only as future work.
  • Because the comparison compiles numbers from different original papers, a standardized re-benchmark on one dataset and one GPU would turn the qualitative rankings into a firm decision table.
  • The device-oriented framing implies a practical selection rule: memory-limited platforms should prefer lightweight sub-pixel or meta modules, while quality-critical applications can afford transposed-convolution or interpolation-preprocessing backbones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey of convolutional-neural-network-based image super-resolution methods. It proposes a taxonomy that divides methods into interpolation-based (bicubic, nearest-neighbor, bilinear) and module-based (transposed convolution, sub-pixel layer, meta-upsampling) families, discusses both non-blind and blind super-resolution within each family, and presents qualitative and quantitative comparisons on standard benchmarks. The paper also lists open research directions and challenges. Its central claim is to provide a systematic, experiment-backed comparison of CNN-based super-resolution methods and to clarify their differences and relationships.

Significance. The survey has genuine breadth: it collects roughly a hundred methods, organizes them under a coherent taxonomy, and links each method to its original source, which could be useful to newcomers and practitioners. The discussion of interpolation versus modular upsampling and of non-blind versus blind SR is a sensible organizing principle. However, the paper's distinctive contribution is the experimental comparison in Section 3.4, and that section currently contains serious errors in the reported numbers, internal contradictions, and missing provenance information. Since the comparative conclusions rest on those tables, the usefulness of the paper as a reliable reference is currently compromised. If the numerical issues are corrected and the experimental provenance is documented, the survey would be a valuable contribution to the field.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4, Table 13] The HAN rows in Tables 13-15 report values that are implausibly low for this method. For example, on Set5 at scale 2, Table 13 gives HAN as 26.83 dB / 0.7919, whereas the published HAN paper reports approximately 38.27 dB / 0.9614 for the same benchmark; similar discrepancies appear for Set14, BSD100, and Urban100 at all scales. Because these tables are the empirical basis for the paper's comparative claims, every entry, and not only HAN, must be re-verified against the cited original papers, and any transcription or protocol errors must be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.4, Table 13 and accompanying text] The text states that RDN performs best on Set5 at scale 2, but Table 13 itself lists RCAN with PSNR 38.33 and SSIM 0.9617 versus RDN with 38.24 and 0.9614. This is an internal contradiction between the stated ranking and the reported numbers. The ranking statement and the table must be made consistent.
  3. [Section 3.4, Table 18] Table 18 is incomplete: the DASR row contains PSNR values but no SSIM values for any of the six columns, and the IKC row is cited as reference [48] although the bibliography entry for IKC is numbered [58]. Additionally, the PCSR row uses only three decimal places for SSIM while other rows use four, and the row appears to have missing entries for the scale-3 columns. The table as presented cannot support the claim that DASR performs best; it must be completed, corrected, and its sources identified.
  4. [Section 3.4, §3.3] The quantitative comparison in Tables 13-18 is presented as a systematic evaluation, but the manuscript provides no experimental protocol: the text in §3.3 only says that settings can be found in each method's paper, and no information is given about training data, evaluation code, hardware, or error bars. Since the methods were trained on different datasets (as documented in Table 12) and possibly with different protocols, the raw PSNR/SSIM numbers are not directly comparable. The authors must either normalize the comparison by running the methods under a common protocol or explicitly state the provenance of each number and discuss the limitations of cross-paper comparison.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 13] The EDSR entry for Set14 at scale 2 contains the invalid SSIM value "0.92.4"; this is clearly a typographical error and should be corrected to a valid four-decimal value.
  2. [Table 18] The PCSR row reports SSIM values such as 0.909 and 0.856 with three decimal places, while all other rows in the table use four; formatting should be made uniform.
  3. [Section 2.1.3 and Tables 2 and 6] The abbreviation DASR is used for two different methods: the degradation-aware SR method of Wang et al. (reference [61]) and the domain-distance aware SR method of Wei et al. (reference [88]). This is confusing and the two methods should be disambiguated, for example by using fuller names or distinct abbreviations.
  4. [References] Reference [15] appears to be missing its author list; the entry begins with "al. Generative adversarial networks for image super-resolution: a survey" and should be completed.
  5. [Journal header] The header lists the issue as "V ol.7 No.1 2012 年 2 月" while the DOI and submission date correspond to 2024/2025; the volume/date metadata is internally inconsistent and needs correction.
  6. [Section 3.4, Tables 16 and 17] The text says that CFSRCNN is fastest in Table 16, then says in the sentence accompanying Table 17 that CARN-M has the smallest parameter count and the fastest speed. Table 17 reports FLOPs rather than measured runtime, so the second speed claim appears to refer to computational complexity; this should be stated explicitly to avoid the appearance of a contradiction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No formal circularity: the survey's taxonomy and performance tables are compiled from external published results; the self-cited visual highlights are an objectivity concern, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

This is a review/taxonomy paper rather than a derivation from first principles. The central claim is that CNN super-resolution methods can be organized by upsampling strategy (bicubic, nearest-neighbor, bilinear, transposed convolution, sub-pixel, meta-upsampling) and compared. That organization is a descriptive classification, not a prediction obtained from fitted inputs; no equation defines one method's output in terms of another method's reported performance. The quantitative comparisons in Section 3.4 are compilations of published scores. Section 3.3 explicitly warns that 'since different methods have different experimental equipment, configurations and settings' ('由于不同方法实验设备、配置及实验设置不同') and defers to each original paper, which shows the tables are collected rather than produced by a controlled derivation. The internal inconsistencies noted by the reader (e.g., the text says RDN is best on Set5 at x2 in Table 13 while the table lists RCAN at 38.33/0.9617 above RDN at 38.24/0.9614; HAN entries such as 26.83/0.7919 are implausible; EDSR's Set14 SSIM value '0.92.4' is malformed; Table 18 omits DASR SSIM values) are data-integrity and reliability problems, not circular reasoning. The authors do cite and feature their own methods (CFSRCNN, LESRCNN) in the qualitative visual comparisons, but those are subjective illustrations rather than a load-bearing derivation chain; the survey's classification and main tabulated comparisons would stand unchanged if the self-cited visual examples were removed. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no equation reduces to its own input. Therefore the circularity score is 0; the paper's weaknesses belong to correctness/objectivity risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no new physical or mathematical entities, no fitted parameters, and no new empirical constants. It relies entirely on prior methods and publicly reported metrics, so the ledger is minimal.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The reported PSNR/SSIM values in the cited papers are accurate and directly comparable across different methods.
    Section 3.4 presents Tables 13-18 without recalculation or normalization, implicitly assuming the numbers are correct and comparable even though they originate from different experimental setups.
  • domain assumption PSNR and SSIM are appropriate and sufficient metrics for evaluating and comparing image SR performance.
    Section 3.2 introduces PSNR and SSIM and uses them exclusively for quantitative comparisons, without discussing their limitations in the comparative analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Application of convolutional neural networks in image super-resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GLEPS66W

@misc{pith2026250602604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Application of convolutional neural networks in image super-resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GLEPS66W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02604}
}
read the original abstract

Due to strong learning abilities of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), they have become mainstream methods for image super-resolution. However, there are big differences of different deep learning methods with different types. There is little literature to summarize relations and differences of different methods in image super-resolution. Thus, summarizing these literatures are important, according to loading capacity and execution speed of devices. This paper first introduces principles of CNNs in image super-resolution, then introduces CNNs based bicubic interpolation, nearest neighbor interpolation, bilinear interpolation, transposed convolution, sub-pixel layer, meta up-sampling for image super-resolution to analyze differences and relations of different CNNs based interpolations and modules, and compare performance of these methods by experiments. Finally, this paper gives potential research points and drawbacks and summarizes the whole paper, which can facilitate developments of CNNs in image super-resolution.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    D -SRGAN: DEM super-resolutionwith generative adversarial networks[J]

    DEMIRAY B Z, SIT M, DEMIR I. D -SRGAN: DEM super-resolutionwith generative adversarial networks[J]. SN computer science, 2021, 2(1): 48

    2021

  2. [58]

    Blind super-resolution with iterative kernel correction[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    GU Jinjin, LU Hannan, ZUO Wangmeng, et al. Blind super-resolution with iterative kernel correction[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach：IEEE, 2019: 1604-1613

    2019

  3. [1]

    图像超分辨重建算法综述[J]

    史振威, [1] 史振威, 雷森. 图像超分辨重建算法综述[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2020, 35(1): 1-20. SHI Zhenwei, LEI Sen. Review of image super -resolution reconstruction[J]. Journal of data acquisition and processing, 2020, 35(1): 1-20

    2020

  4. [2]

    A super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for surveillance images[J]

    ZHANG Liangpei, ZHANG Hongyan, SHEN Huanfeng, et al. A super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for surveillance images[J]. Signal processing, 2010, 90(3): 848-859. ·24· 智 能 系 统 学 报 第 7 卷

    2010

  5. [3]

    BasicVSR: improving video super -resolution with enhanced propagation and alignment[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    CHAN K C K, ZHOU Shangchen, XU Xiangyu, et al. BasicVSR: improving video super -resolution with enhanced propagation and alignment[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New Orleans, LA, USA. IEEE, 2022: 5962-5971

    2022

  6. [4]

    Nearest neighbor value interpolation[EB/OL]

    RUKUNDO O, CAO Hanqiang. Nearest neighbor value interpolation[EB/OL]. 2012: 1211.1768. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1768v2

    arXiv 2012

  7. [5]

    Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images[J]

    ELAD M, FEUER A. Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 1997, 6(12): 1646-1658

    1997

  8. [6]

    Evaluation of different image interpolation algorithms[J]

    PRAJAPATI A, NAIK S, MEHTA S. Evaluation of different image interpolation algorithms[J]. International journal of computer applications, 2012, 58(12): 6-12

    2012

Show all 170 references
  1. [7]

    Image super-resolution via sparse representation[J]

    YANG Jianchao, WRIGHT J, HUANG T S, et al. Image super-resolution via sparse representation[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2010, 19(11): 2861-2873

    2010

  2. [8]

    Super-resolved surface reconstruction from multiple images[M]//Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods

    CHEESEMAN P, KANEFSKY B, KRAFT R, et al. Super-resolved surface reconstruction from multiple images[M]//Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1996: 293-308

    1996

  3. [9]

    Super resolution from image sequences[C]// Proceedings 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition

    IRANI M, PELEG S. Super resolution from image sequences[C]// Proceedings 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Atlantic City： IEEE, 1990: 115-120

    1990

  4. [10]

    Very high resolution imaging scheme with multiple different -aperture cameras[J]

    KOMATSU T, IGARASHI T, AIZAWA K, et al. Very high resolution imaging scheme with multiple different -aperture cameras[J]. Signal processing: image communication, 1993, 5(5/6): 511-526

    1993

  5. [11]

    Generalization of iterative restoration techniques for super -resolution[C]//2011 24th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images

    AGUENA M, MASCARENHAS N. Generalization of iterative restoration techniques for super -resolution[C]//2011 24th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images. Alagoas：IEEE, 2011: 258-265

    2011

  6. [12]

    Image super -resolution with sparse neighbor embedding[J]

    GAO Xinbo, ZHANG Kaibing, TAO Dacheng, et al. Image super -resolution with sparse neighbor embedding[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2012, 21(7): 3194-3205

    2012

  7. [13]

    Image super-resolution survey[J]

    V AN OUWERKERK J D. Image super-resolution survey[J]. Image and vision computing, 2006, 24(10): 1039-1052

    2006

  8. [14]

    Face image super-resolution through POCS and residue compensation[C]//2008 5th International Conference on Visual Information Engineering (VIE 2008)

    YU Hong, XIANG Ma, HUA Huang, et al. Face image super-resolution through POCS and residue compensation[C]//2008 5th International Conference on Visual Information Engineering (VIE 2008). Xi’an: IET, 2008: 494-497. al. Generative adversarial networks for image super -resolution...

    2008

  9. [16]

    Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks[J]

    DONG Chao, LOY C C, HE Kaiming, et al. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks[J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2016, 38(2): 295-307

    2016

  10. [17]

    Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    KIM J, LEE J K, LEE K M. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas： IEEE, 2016: 1646-1654

    2016

  11. [18]

    Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network[M]//Computer Vision–ECCV 2016

    DONG Chao, LOY C C, TANG Xiaoou. Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network[M]//Computer Vision–ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 391-407

    2016

  12. [19]

    A deep convolutional neural network with selection units for super -resolution[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    CHOI J S, KIM M. A deep convolutional neural network with selection units for super -resolution[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Honolulu: IEEE, 2017: 1150-1156

    2017

  13. [20]

    Deeply -recursive convolutional network for image super -resolution[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    KIM J, LEE J K, LEE K M. Deeply -recursive convolutional network for image super -resolution[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas: IEEE, 2016: 1637-1645

    2016

  14. [21]

    Image super-resolution using dense skip connections[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Compute r Vision

    TONG Tong, LI Gen, LIU Xiejie, et al. Image super-resolution using dense skip connections[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Compute r Vision. Venice : IEEE, 2017: 4809-4817

    2017

  15. [22]

    Residual dense network for image super -resolution[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    ZHANG Yulun, TIAN Yapeng, KONG Yu, et al. Residual dense network for image super -resolution[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City: IEEE, 2018: 2472-2481

    2018

  16. [23]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks[C]// Computer Vision –ECCV 2018

    ZHANG Yulun, LI Kunpeng, LI Kai, et al. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks[C]// Computer Vision –ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 294-310

    2018

  17. [24]

    Second-order attention network for single image super-resolution[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    DAI Tao, CAI Jianrui, ZHANG Yongbing, et al. Second-order attention network for single image super-resolution[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach : IEEE, 2019: 11057-11066

    2019

  18. [25]

    Photo -realistic single image super -resolution using a generative adversarial network[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    LEDIG C, THEIS L, HUSZÁR F, et al. Photo -realistic single image super -resolution using a generative adversarial network[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu： IEEE, 2017: 105-114

    2017

  19. [26]

    ESRGAN: 第 1 期 田春伟，等：文章题名 ·25· enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops

    WANG Xintao, YU Ke, WU Shixiang, et al. ESRGAN: 第 1 期 田春伟，等：文章题名 ·25· enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 63-79

    2018

  20. [27]

    基于广泛激活深度残差网络的图像 超分辨率重建[J]

    王凡超, 丁世飞. 基于广泛激活深度残差网络的图像 超分辨率重建[J]. 智能系统学报, 2022, 17(2): 440-446. WANG Fanchao, DING Shifei. Image super -resolution reconstruction based on widely activated deep residual networks[J]. CAAI transactions on intelligent systems, 2022, 17(2): 440-446

    2022

  21. [28]

    基于多路特征渐进融合和注意力机 制的轻量级图像超分辨率重建 [J]

    刘玉铠, 周登文. 基于多路特征渐进融合和注意力机 制的轻量级图像超分辨率重建 [J]. 智能系统学报 , 2024, 19(4):863-873. LIU Yukai, ZHOU Dengwen. Lightweight super -resolution reconstruction via progressive multi -path feature fusion and attention mechanism[J]. CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2024, 19(4): 863-873

    2024

  22. [29]

    Deep learning for single image super -resolution: a brief review[J]

    YANG Wenming, ZHANG Xuechen, TIAN Yapeng, et al. Deep learning for single image super -resolution: a brief review[J]. IEEE transactions on multimedia, 2019, 21(12): 3106-3121

    2019

  23. [30]

    Gradient profile prior and its applications in image super -resolution and enhancement[J]

    SUN Jian, SUN Jian, XU Zongben, et al. Gradient profile prior and its applications in image super -resolution and enhancement[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2011, 20(6): 1529-1542

    2011

  24. [31]

    Deep learning for image super -resolution: a survey[J]

    WANG Zhihao, CHEN Jian, HOI S C H. Deep learning for image super -resolution: a survey[J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2021, 43(10): 3365-3387

    2021

  25. [32]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large -scale image recognition[EB/OL]

    SIMONYAN K, ZISSERMAN A. Very deep convolutional networks for large -scale image recognition[EB/OL]. 2014: 1409.1556. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556v6

    2014 arXiv

  26. [33]

    A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images[J]

    CHEN Jin, ZHU Xiaolin, VOGELMANN J E, et al. A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2011, 115(4): 1053-1064

    2011

  27. [34]

    Super -resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview[J]

    PARK S C, PARK M K, KANG M G. Super -resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview[J]. IEEE signal processing magazine, 2003, 20(3): 21-36

    2003

  28. [35]

    Cu bic convolution interpolation for digital image processing[J]

    KEYS R. Cu bic convolution interpolation for digital image processing[J]. IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 1981, 29(6): 1153-1160

    1981

  29. [36]

    Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy[M]

    KIRKLAND E J. Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy[M]. Boston: Springer US, 1998

    1998

  30. [37]

    基于递归残差网络的图像超 分辨率重建

    周登文, 赵丽娟, 段然等. 基于递归残差网络的图像超 分辨率重建 . 自动化学报 , 2019, 45(6): 1157 -1165. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c180334 ZHOU Deng -Wen, ZHAO Li -Juan, DUAN Ran, et al. Image Super-resolution Based on Recursive Residual Networks. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2019, 45(6): 1157 -1165. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c180334

    2019 doi

  31. [38]

    Image super resolution based on fusing multiple convolution neural networks[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    REN Haoyu, EL -KHAMY M, LEE J. Image super resolution based on fusing multiple convolution neural networks[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Honolulu ： IEEE, 2017: 1050-1057

    2017

  32. [39]

    MemNet: a persistent memory network for image restoration[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

    TAI Ying, YANG Jian, LIU Xiaoming, et al. MemNet: a persistent memory network for image restoration[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice ： IEEE, 2017: 4549-4557

    2017

  33. [40]

    Single image super-resolution via cascaded multi -scale cross network[EB/OL]

    HU Yanting, GAO Xinbo, LI Jie, et al. Single image super-resolution via cascaded multi -scale cross network[EB/OL]. 2018: 1802.08808. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08808v1

    2018 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Fast and accurate image super resolution by deep CNN with skip connection and network in network[M]//Neu ral Information Processing

    YAMANAKA J, KUWASHIMA S, KURITA T. Fast and accurate image super resolution by deep CNN with skip connection and network in network[M]//Neu ral Information Processing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 217-225

    2017

  35. [42]

    基于自注意力深度网络 的图像超分辨率重建方法 [J]

    陈子涵, 吴浩博, 裴浩东, 等. 基于自注意力深度网络 的图像超分辨率重建方法 [J]. 激光与光电子学进展 , 2021, 58(4): 0410013. CHEN Zihan, WU Haobo, PEI Haodong, et al. Image super-resolution reconstruction method based on self -attention deep network[J]. Laser & optoelectronics progress, 2021, 58(4): 0410013

    2021

  36. [43]

    Image super-resolution via deep recursive residual network[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    TAI Ying, YANG Jian, LIU Xiaoming. Image super-resolution via deep recursive residual network[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu：IEEE, 2017: 2790-2798

    2017

  37. [44]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super -resolution[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    LIM B, SON S, KIM H, et al. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super -resolution[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Honolulu：IEEE, 2017: 1132-1140

    2017

  38. [45]

    Real-ESRGAN: training real -world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops

    WANG Xintao, XIE Liangbin, DONG Chao, et al. Real-ESRGAN: training real -world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops. Montreal： IEEE, 2021: 1905-1914

    2021

  39. [46]

    Coarse-to-fine CNN for image super -resolution[J]

    TIAN Chunwei, XU Yong, ZUO Wangmeng, et al. Coarse-to-fine CNN for image super -resolution[J]. IEEE ·26· 智 能 系 统 学 报 第 7 卷 transactions on multimedia, 2020, 23: 1489-1502

    2020

  40. [47]

    Benefiting from bicubically down -sampled images for learning real -world image super -resolution[C]//2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    SAEED RAD M, YU T, MUSAT C, et al. Benefiting from bicubically down -sampled images for learning real -world image super -resolution[C]//2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. Waikoloa ： IEEE, 2021: 1590-1599

    2021

  41. [49]

    Med -SRNet: GAN-based medical image super-resolution via high-resolution representation learning[J]

    ZHANG Lina, DAI Haidong, SANG Yu. Med -SRNet: GAN-based medical image super-resolution via high-resolution representation learning[J]. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022, 2022(1): 1744969

    2022

  42. [50]

    A fully progressive approach to single -image super-resolution[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    WANG Yifan, PERAZZI F, MCWILLIAMS B, et al. A fully progressive approach to single -image super-resolution[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Salt Lake City ： IEEE, 2018: 977-97709

    2018

  43. [51]

    Color -guided depth map super resolution using convolutional neural network[J]

    NI Min, LEI Jianjun, CONG Runmin, et al. Color -guided depth map super resolution using convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE access, 2017, 5: 26666-26672

    2017

  44. [52]

    SSF -CNN: spatial and spectral fusion with CNN for hyperspectral image super-resolution[C]//2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

    HAN Xianhua, SHI Boxin, ZHENG Yinqiang. SSF -CNN: spatial and spectral fusion with CNN for hyperspectral image super-resolution[C]//2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Athens： IEEE, 2018: 2506-2510

    2018

  45. [53]

    Deep networks for image super-resolution with sparse prior[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

    WANG Zhaowen, LIU Ding, YANG Jianchao, et al. Deep networks for image super-resolution with sparse prior[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Santiago： IEEE, 2015: 370-378

    2015

  46. [54]

    Fast and accurate single image super -resolution via information distillation network[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    HUI Zheng, WANG Xiumei, GAO Xinbo. Fast and accurate single image super -resolution via information distillation network[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City ： IEEE, 2018: 723-731

    2018

  47. [55]

    Unsupervised image super -resolution using cycle -in-cycle generative adversarial networks[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    YUAN Y uan, LIU Siyuan, ZHANG Jiawei, et al. Unsupervised image super -resolution using cycle -in-cycle generative adversarial networks[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Salt Lake City： IEEE, 2018: 814-81409

    2018

  48. [56]

    Unpaired image super -resolution using pseudo-supervision[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conferenc e on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    MAEDA S. Unpaired image super -resolution using pseudo-supervision[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conferenc e on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle ： IEEE, 2020: 291-300

    2020

  49. [57]

    Deep plug-and-play super -resolution for arbitrary blur kernels[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    ZHANG Kai, ZUO Wangmeng, ZHANG Lei. Deep plug-and-play super -resolution for arbitrary blur kernels[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach： IEEE, 2019: 1671-1681

    2019

  50. [59]

    Kernel modeling super-resolution on real low -resolution images[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    ZHOU Ruo fan, SUSSTRUNK S. Kernel modeling super-resolution on real low -resolution images[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Seoul：IEEE, 2019: 2433-2443

    2019

  51. [60]

    Blind super-resolution kernel estimation using an internal -GAN[J]

    BELL -KLIGLER S, SHOCHER A, IRANI M. Blind super-resolution kernel estimation using an internal -GAN[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, 32

    2019

  52. [61]

    Unsupervised degradation representation learning for blind super-resolution[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Comput er Vision and Pattern Recognition

    WANG Longguang, WANG Yingqian, DONG Xiaoyu, et al. Unsupervised degradation representation learning for blind super-resolution[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Comput er Vision and Pattern Recognition. Nashville, USA. IEEE, 2021: 10581-10590

    2021

  53. [62]

    Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    ZHANG Kai, LIANG Jingyun, V AN GOOL L, et al. Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Montreal： IEEE, 2021: 4771-4780

    2021

  54. [63]

    Blind image super -resolution via contrastive representation learning[EB/OL]

    ZHANG Jiahui, LU Shijian, ZHAN Fangneng, et al. Blind image super -resolution via contrastive representation learning[EB/OL]. 2021: 2107.00708. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00708v1

    2021 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Bridging component learning with degradation modelling for blind image super -resolution[J]

    WU Yixuan, LI Feng, BAI Huihui, et al. Bridging component learning with degradation modelling for blind image super -resolution[J]. IEEE transactions on multimedia, 2022(99): 1-16

    2022

  56. [65]

    Blind image super-resolution based on prior correction network[J]

    CAO Xiang, LUO Yihao, XIAO Yi, et al. Blind image super-resolution based on prior correction network[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 463: 525-534

    2021

  57. [66]

    Blind image super resolution using deep unsupervised learning[J]

    YAMAWAKI K, SUN Yongqing, HAN Xianhua. Blind image super resolution using deep unsupervised learning[J]. Electronics, 2021, 10(21): 2591

    2021

  58. [67]

    Deep blind un-supervised learning ne twork for single image super resolution[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

    YAMAWAKI K, HAN Xianhua. Deep blind un-supervised learning ne twork for single image super resolution[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Anchorage： IEEE, 2021: 1789-1793

    2021

  59. [68]

    数字图像处理中的插值算法研究 [J]

    丁宇胜. 数字图像处理中的插值算法研究 [J]. 电脑知 识与技术, 2010, 6(16): 4502-4503, 4506. DING Yusheng. Interpolated algorithm research in digital image processing[J]. Computer knowledge and technology, 2010, 6(16): 4502-4503, 4506. 第 1 期 田春伟，等：文章题名 ·27·

    2010

  60. [69]

    Deep unfolding network for image super -resolution[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    ZHANG Kai, V AN GOOL L, TIMOFTE R. Deep unfolding network for image super -resolution[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle：IEEE, 2020: 3217-3226

    2020

  61. [70]

    Balanced two-stage residual networks for image super-resolution[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    FAN Yuchen, SHI Honghui, YU Jiahui, et al. Balanced two-stage residual networks for image super-resolution[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Honolulu ：IEEE, 2017: 1157-1164

    2017

  62. [71]

    EnhanceNet: single image super -resolution through aut omated texture synthesis[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

    SAJJADI M S M, SCHÖLKOPF B, HIRSCH M. EnhanceNet: single image super -resolution through aut omated texture synthesis[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice：IEEE, 2017: 4501-4510

    2017

  63. [72]

    Perceptual extreme super resolution network with receptive field block[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    SHANG Taizhang, DAI Qiuju, ZHU Shengchen, et al. Perceptual extreme super resolution network with receptive field block[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Seattle ：IEEE, 2020: 440-441

    2020

  64. [73]

    Efficient image super -resolution using pixel attention[M]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2020 Workshops

    ZHAO Hengyuan, KONG Xiangtao, HE Jingwen, et al. Efficient image super -resolution using pixel attention[M]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2020 Workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 56-72

    2020

  65. [74]

    CCNet: criss -cross attention for semantic segmentation[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    HUANG Zilong, WANG Xinggang, HUANG Lichao, et al. CCNet: criss -cross attention for semantic segmentation[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Seoul：IEEE, 2019: 603-612

    2019

  66. [75]

    Practical single -image super -resolution using look -up table[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    JO Y , KIM S J. Practical single -image super -resolution using look -up table[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Nashville ：IEEE, 2021: 691-700

    2021

  67. [76]

    Mutual affine network for spatially variant kernel estimation in blind image super -resolution[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    LIANG Jingyun, SUN Guolei, ZHANG Kai, et al. Mutual affine network for spatially variant kernel estimation in blind image super -resolution[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Montreal ： IEEE, 2021: 4076-4085

    2021

  68. [77]

    SRDRL: a blind super-resolution framework with degradation reconstruction loss[J]

    HE Zongyao, JIN Zhi, ZHAO Yao. SRDRL: a blind super-resolution framework with degradation reconstruction loss[J]. IEEE transactions on multimedia, 2021, 24: 2877-2889

    2021

  69. [78]

    Image super -resolution based on convolution neural networks using multi -channel input[C]//2016 IEEE 12th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop

    YOUM G Y , BAE S H, KIM M. Image super -resolution based on convolution neural networks using multi -channel input[C]//2016 IEEE 12th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop. Bordeaux：IEEE, 2016: 1-5

    2016

  70. [79]

    Enhancement of anime imaging enlargement using modified super-resolution CNN[C]//2021 13th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering

    INTANIYOM T, THANANPORN W, WORARATPANYA K. Enhancement of anime imaging enlargement using modified super-resolution CNN[C]//2021 13th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering. Chiang Mai：IEEE, 2021: 226-231

    2021

  71. [80]

    Fast and efficient image quality enhancement via desubpixel convolutional neural networks[M]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops

    VU T, NGUYEN C V , PHAM T X, et al. Fast and efficient image quality enhancement via desubpixel convolutional neural networks[M]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 243-259

    2018

  72. [81]

    A fast and accurate super -resolution network using progressive residual learning[C]//ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

    LIU Hong, LU Zhisheng, SHI Wei, et al. A fast and accurate super -resolution network using progressive residual learning[C]//ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Barcelona：IEEE, 2020: 1818-1822

    2020

  73. [82]

    Deformable and residual convolutional network for image super -resolution[J]

    ZHANG Yan, SUN Yemei, LIU Shudong. Deformable and residual convolutional network for image super -resolution[J]. Applied intelligence, 2022, 52(1): 295-304

    2022

  74. [83]

    KIM G, PARK J, LEE K, et al. Unsupervised real -world super resolution with cycle generative adversarial network and domain discriminator[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Seattle： IEEE, 2020: 1862-1871

    2020

  75. [84]

    Scale -wise convolution for image restoration[J]

    FAN Yuchen, YU Jiahui, LIU Ding, et al. Scale -wise convolution for image restoration[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2020, 34(7): 10770-10777

    2020

  76. [85]

    Accurate magnetic resonance image super -resolution using deep networks and Gaussian filtering in the stationary wavelet domain[J]

    SURYANARAYANA G, CHANDRAN K, KHALAF O I, et al. Accurate magnetic resonance image super -resolution using deep networks and Gaussian filtering in the stationary wavelet domain[J]. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 71406-71417

    2021

  77. [86]

    A deep residual star generative adversarial network for mul ti-domain image super-resolution[C]//2021 6th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies

    UMER R M, MUNIR A, MICHELONI C. A deep residual star generative adversarial network for mul ti-domain image super-resolution[C]//2021 6th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies. Bol and Split：IEEE, 2021: 1-5

    2021

  78. [87]

    EDKE: encoder-decoder based kernel estimation for blind image super-resolution[C]//2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

    ZHU Mingyan, DAI Tao, XIA Shutao, et al. EDKE: encoder-decoder based kernel estimation for blind image super-resolution[C]//2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Shenzhen：IEEE, 2021: 1-7

    2021

  79. [88]

    Unsupervised real -world image super resolution via domain-distance aware training[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    WEI Y unxuan, GU Shuhang, LI Yawei, et al. Unsupervised real -world image super resolution via domain-distance aware training[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Nashville：IEEE, 2021: 13385-13394

    2021

  80. [89]

    Convolutional neural network-based block up -sampling for intra frame coding[J]

    LI Yue, LIU Dong, LI Houqiang, et al. Convolutional neural network-based block up -sampling for intra frame coding[J]. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 2018, 28(9): 2316-2330

    2018

  81. [90]

    Image restoration using ·28· 智 能 系 统 学 报 第 7 卷 very deep convolutional encoder -decoder networks with symmetric skip connections[J]

    MAO X, SHEN C, YANG Y B. Image restoration using ·28· 智 能 系 统 学 报 第 7 卷 very deep convolutional encoder -decoder networks with symmetric skip connections[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016, 29

    2016

  82. [91]

    Fast and accurate image super -resolution with deep Laplacian pyramid networks[J]

    LAI Weisheng, HUANG Jiabin, AHUJA N, et al. Fast and accurate image super -resolution with deep Laplacian pyramid networks[J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2019, 41(11): 2599-2613

    2019

  83. [92]

    MR image super-resolution via wide residual networks with fixed skip connection[J]

    SHI Jun, LI Zheng, YING Shihui, et al. MR image super-resolution via wide residual networks with fixed skip connection[J]. IEEE journal of bi omedical and health informatics, 2019, 23(3): 1129-1140

    2019

  84. [93]

    Feedback network for image super -resolution[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    LI Zhen, YANG Jinglei, LIU Zheng, et al. Feedback network for image super -resolution[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach：IEEE, 2019: 3862-3871

    2019

  85. [94]

    Single image super-resolution using a polymorphic parallel CNN[J]

    ZENG Kai, DING Shifei, JIA Weikuan. Single image super-resolution using a polymorphic parallel CNN[J]. Applied intelligence, 2019, 49(1): 292-300

    2019

  86. [95]

    Deep back-projection networks for super -resolution[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    HARIS M, SHAKHNAROVICH G, UKITA N. Deep back-projection networks for super -resolution[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City：IEEE, 2018: 1664-1673

    2018

  87. [96]

    DRFN: deep recurrent fusion network for single-image super-resolution with large factors[J]

    YANG Xin, MEI Haiyang, ZHANG Jiqing, et al. DRFN: deep recurrent fusion network for single-image super-resolution with large factors[J]. IEEE transactions on multimedia, 2019, 21(2): 328-337

    2019

  88. [97]

    Joint sub -bands learning with clique structures for wavelet domain super -resolution[EB/OL]

    ZHONG Zhisheng, SHEN Tiancheng, YANG Yibo, et al. Joint sub -bands learning with clique structures for wavelet domain super -resolution[EB/OL]. 2018: 1809.04508. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04508v3

    2018 arXiv

  89. [98]

    End-to-end image super -resolution via deep and shallow convolutional networks[J]

    WANG Yifan, W ANG Lijun, WANG Hongyu, et al. End-to-end image super -resolution via deep and shallow convolutional networks[J]. IEEE access, 2019, 7: 31959-31970

    2019

  90. [99]

    Multi-scale residual network for image super -resolution[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2018

    LI Juncheng, FANG Faming, MEI Kangfu, et al. Multi-scale residual network for image super -resolution[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 527-542

    2018

  91. [100]

    Efficient image super -resolution via self-calibrated feature fuse[J]

    TAN Congming, CHENG Shuli, WANG Liejun. Efficient image super -resolution via self-calibrated feature fuse[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(1): 329

    2022

  92. [101]

    ResLap: generating high -resolution climate prediction through image super -resolution[J]

    CHENG Jianxin, KUAN G Qiuming, SHEN Chenkai, et al. ResLap: generating high -resolution climate prediction through image super -resolution[J]. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 39623-39634. al. Multiattention generative adversarial network for remote sensing image super -resolution[J]. IE...

    2020

  93. [103]

    MFFN: image super -resolution via multi-level features fusion network[J]

    CHEN Y uantao, XIA Runlong, YANG Kai, et al. MFFN: image super -resolution via multi-level features fusion network[J]. The visual computer, 2024, 40(2): 489-504

    2024

  94. [104]

    Uncertainty -driven mixture convolution and transformer network for remote sensing image super-resolution[J]

    ZHANG Xiaomin. Uncertainty -driven mixture convolution and transformer network for remote sensing image super-resolution[J]. Scientific reports, 2024, 14: 9435

    2024

  95. [105]

    A very lightweight image super-resolution network[J]

    BAI Haomou, LIANG Xiao. A very lightweight image super-resolution network[J]. Scientific reports, 2024, 14(1): 13850. Single image super -resolution by cascading parallel -structure units through a deep -shallow CNN[J]. Optik, 2023, 286: 171001

    2024

  96. [107]

    Learning to super -resolve blurry face and text images[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

    XU Xiangyu, SUN Deqing, PAN Jinshan, et al. Learning to super -resolve blurry face and text images[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice ：IEEE, 2017: 251-260

    2017

  97. [108]

    Spectrum -to-kernel translation for accurate blind image super -resolution[J]

    TAO G, JI X, WANG W, et al. Spectrum -to-kernel translation for accurate blind image super -resolution[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2021, 34: 22643-22654

    2021

  98. [109]

    Uncertainty learning in kernel estimation for multi -stage blind image super -resolution[M]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2022

    FANG Zhenxuan, DONG Weisheng, LI Xin, et al. Uncertainty learning in kernel estimation for multi -stage blind image super -resolution[M]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2022. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022: 144-161

    2022

  99. [110]

    X -ray image super-resolution reconstruction based on a mult iple distillation feedback network[J]

    DU Yanbin, JIA Ruisheng, CUI Zhe, et al. X -ray image super-resolution reconstruction based on a mult iple distillation feedback network[J]. Applied intelligence, 2021, 51(7): 5081-5094

    2021

  100. [111]

    Real-time single image and video super -resolution using an efficient sub -pixel convolutional neural network[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    SHI Wenzhe, CABALLERO J, HUSZÁR F, et al. Real-time single image and video super -resolution using an efficient sub -pixel convolutional neural network[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas：IEEE, 2016: 1874-1883

    2016

  101. [112]

    Gradual deep residual network for super -resolution[J]

    SONG Zhaoyang, ZHAO Xiaoqiang, JIANG Hongmei. Gradual deep residual network for super -resolution[J]. Multimedia tools and applications, 2021, 80(7): 9765-9778

    2021

  102. [113]

    Single image super -resolution model base d on improved sub -pixel convolutional neural network[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications

    JIANG Pengfei, LIN Weiguo, SHANG Wenqian. Single image super -resolution model base d on improved sub -pixel convolutional neural network[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications. Shenyang：IEEE, 2021: 132-136

    2021

  103. [114]

    Single image super-resolution via a holistic attention network[M]//Computer 第 1 期 田春伟，等：文章题名 ·29· Vision–ECCV 2020

    NIU Ben, WEN Weilei, REN Wenqi, et al. Single image super-resolution via a holistic attention network[M]//Computer 第 1 期 田春伟，等：文章题名 ·29· Vision–ECCV 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 191-207

    2020

  104. [115]

    Hierarchical dense recursive network for image super-resolution[J]

    JIANG Kui, WANG Zhongyuan, YI Peng, et al. Hierarchical dense recursive network for image super-resolution[J]. Pattern recognition, 2020, 107: 107475

    2020

  105. [116]

    Lightweight image super -resolution with information multi-distillation network[C]//Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    HUI Zheng, GAO Xinbo, YANG Yunchu, et al. Lightweight image super -resolution with information multi-distillation network[C]//Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Nice ：ACM, 2019: 2024-2032

    2019

  106. [117]

    Fully 1× 1 convolutional network for lightweight image super-resolution[EB/OL]

    WU Gang, JIANG Junjun, JIANG Kui, et al. Fully 1× 1 convolutional network for lightweight image super-resolution[EB/OL]. 2023: 2307.16140. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16140v2

    2023 arXiv

  107. [118]

    Scaling up your kernels to 31 × 31: revisiting large kernel design in CNNs[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    DING Xiaohan, ZHANG X, ZHOU Yizhuang, et al. Scaling up your kernels to 31 × 31: revisiting large kernel design in CNNs[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. New Orleans, LA, USA. 2022: 11963-11975

    2022

  108. [119]

    Multi -scale attention network for single image super -resolution[C]//2024 IEEE/CVF Confer ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    WANG Yan, LI Yusen, WANG Gang, et al. Multi -scale attention network for single image super -resolution[C]//2024 IEEE/CVF Confer ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Seattle： IEEE, 2024: 5950-5960

    2024

  109. [120]

    Super-resolution for monocular depth estimation with multi-scale sub -pixel convolutions and a smoothness constraint[J]

    ZHAO Shiyu, ZHANG Lin, SHEN Ying, et al. Super-resolution for monocular depth estimation with multi-scale sub -pixel convolutions and a smoothness constraint[J]. IEEE access, 2019, 7: 16323-16335

    2019

  110. [121]

    Efficient sub -pixel convolutional neural network for terahertz image super -resolution[J]

    RUAN Haihang, TAN Zhiyong, CHEN Liangtao, et al. Efficient sub -pixel convolutional neural network for terahertz image super -resolution[J]. Optics letters, 2022, 47(12): 3115-3118

    2022

  111. [122]

    Large kernel distillation network for efficient single image super-resolution[C]//2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    XIE Chengxing, ZHANG Xiaoming, LI Linze, et al. Large kernel distillation network for efficient single image super-resolution[C]//2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Vancouver： IEEE, 2023: 1283-1292

    2023

  112. [123]

    A hybrid network of CNN and transformer for lightweight image super-resolution[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    FANG Jinsheng, LIN Hanjiang, CHEN Xinyu, et al. A hybrid network of CNN and transformer for lightweight image super-resolution[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. New Orleans ： IEEE, 2022: 1102-1111

    2022

  113. [124]

    Residual local feature network for efficient super-resolution[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    KONG Fangyuan, LI Mingxi, LIU Songwei, et al. Residual local feature network for efficient super-resolution[C]//2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. New Orleans ： IEEE, 2022: 765-775

    2022

  114. [125]

    Image super -resolution via dynamic network[J]

    TIAN Chunwei, ZHANG Xuanyu, ZHANG Qi, et al. Image super -resolution via dynamic network[J]. CAAI transactions on intelligence technology, 2024, 9(4): 837-849

    2024

  115. [126]

    Deep progressive convolutional neural network for blind super -resolution with multiple degradations[C]//2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

    XIAO Jun, ZHAO Rui, LAI S C, et al. Deep progressive convolutional neural network for blind super -resolution with multiple degradations[C]//2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Taipei：IEEE, 2019: 2856-2860

    2019

  116. [127]

    Blind image super -resolution with spatial context hallucination[EB/OL]

    HUO Dong, YANG Y H. Blind image super -resolution with spatial context hallucination[EB/OL]. 2020: 2009.12461.https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12461v1

    2020 arXiv

  117. [128]

    Blind super-resolution on remote sensing images with blur kernel prediction[C]//2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS

    DONG Runmin, ZHANG Lixian, FU Haohuan. Blind super-resolution on remote sensing images with blur kernel prediction[C]//2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. Brussels ：IEEE, 2021: 2879-2882

    2021

  118. [129]

    Meta-SR: a magnification -arbitrary network for super-resolution[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    HU Xuecai, MU Haoyuan , ZHANG Xiangyu, et al. Meta-SR: a magnification -arbitrary network for super-resolution[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach ：IEEE, 2019: 1575-1584

    2019

  119. [130]

    Meta-USR: a unified super -resolution network for multiple degradation parameters[J]

    HU Xuecai, ZHANG Zhang, SHAN Caifeng, et al. Meta-USR: a unified super -resolution network for multiple degradation parameters[J]. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2021, 32(9): 4151-4165

    2021

  120. [131]

    Residual scale attention network for arbitrary scale image super -resolution[J]

    FU Ying, CHEN Jian, ZHANG Tao, et al. Residual scale attention network for arbitrary scale image super -resolution[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 427: 201-211

    2021

  121. [132]

    Different input resolutions and arbitrary output resolution: a meta learning-based deep framework for infrared and visible image fusion[J]

    LI Huafeng, CEN Y ueliang, LIU Yu, et al. Different input resolutions and arbitrary output resolution: a meta learning-based deep framework for infrared and visible image fusion[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2021, 30: 4070-4083

    2021

  122. [133]

    Arbitrary scale super-resolution for brain MRI images[M]//Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations

    TAN Chuan, ZHU Jin, LIO’ P. Arbitrary scale super-resolution for brain MRI images[M]//Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 165-176

    2020

  123. [134]

    MIASSR: an approach for medical image arbitrary scale super-resolution[EB/OL]

    ZHU Jin, TAN Chuan, YANG Junwei, et al. MIASSR: an approach for medical image arbitrary scale super-resolution[EB/OL]. 2021: 2105.10738. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10738v1

    2021 arXiv

  124. [135]

    Decoupled-and-coupled networks: self -supervised hyperspectral image super -resolution with subpixel fusion[J]

    HONG Danfen g, YAO Jing, LI Chenyu, et al. Decoupled-and-coupled networks: self -supervised hyperspectral image super -resolution with subpixel fusion[J]. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2023, 61: ·30· 智 能 系 统 学 报 第 7 卷 5527812

    2023

  125. [136]

    Meta-learning-based degradation representation for blind super-resolution[J]

    XIA Bin, TIAN Yapeng, ZHANG Yulun, et al. Meta-learning-based degradation representation for blind super-resolution[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2023, 32: 3383-3396

    2023

  126. [137]

    ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database[C]//2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    DENG Jia, DONG Wei, SOCHER R, et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database[C]//2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Miami：IEEE, 2009: 248-255

    2009

  127. [138]

    Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation[J]

    ARBELÁEZ P, MAIRE M, FOWLKES C, et al. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation[J]. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2011, 33(5): 898-916

    2011

  128. [139]

    NTIRE 2017 challenge on single image super -resolution: methods and results[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

    TIMOFTE R, AGUSTSSON E, GOOL L V , et al. NTIRE 2017 challenge on single image super -resolution: methods and results[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Honolulu ： IEEE, 2017: 1110-1121

    2017

  129. [140]

    Statistics of real-world hyperspectral images[C]//CVPR 2011

    CHAKRABARTI A, ZICKLER T. Statistics of real-world hyperspectral images[C]//CVPR 2011. Colorado Springs：IEEE, 2011: 193-200

    2011

  130. [141]

    Single image super-resolution from transformed self -exemplars[C]//2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    HUANG Jiabin, SINGH A, AHUJA N. Single image super-resolution from transformed self -exemplars[C]//2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston：IEEE, 2015: 5197-5206

    2015

  131. [142]

    Microsoft COCO: common objects in context[M]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2014

    LIN T Y , MAIRE M, BELONGIE S, et al. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context[M]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014: 740-755

    2014

  132. [143]

    Recovering realistic texture in image super -resolution by deep spatial feature transform[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    WANG Xintao, YU Ke, DONG Chao, et al. Recovering realistic texture in image super -resolution by deep spatial feature transform[C]//2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City ： IEEE, 2018: 606-615

    2018

  133. [144]

    DIV8K: DIVerse 8K resolution image dataset[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop

    GU Shuhang, LUGMAYR A, DANELLJAN M, et al. DIV8K: DIVerse 8K resolution image dataset[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop. Seoul：IEEE, 2019: 3512-3516

    2019

  134. [145]

    Waterloo exploration datab ase: new challenges for image quality assessment models[J]

    MA Kede, DUANMU Zhengfang, WU Qingbo, et al. Waterloo exploration datab ase: new challenges for image quality assessment models[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2017, 26(2): 1004-1016

    2017

  135. [146]

    A style -based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    KARRAS T, LAINE S, AILA Timo. A style -based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach：IEEE, 2019: 4401-4410

    2019

  136. [147]

    Blending texture features from multiple reference images for style transfer[C]//SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Technical Briefs

    IKUTA H, OGAKI K, ODAGIRI Y . Blending texture features from multiple reference images for style transfer[C]//SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Technical Briefs. Macau： ACM, 2016: 1-4

    2016

  137. [148]

    Indoor segmentation and support inference from RGBD images[M]//Computer Vision–ECCV 2012

    SILBERMAN N, HOIEM D, KOHLI P, et al. Indoor segmentation and support inference from RGBD images[M]//Computer Vision–ECCV 2012. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 746-760

    2012

  138. [149]

    Learning 3 -D scene structure from a single still image[C]//2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision

    SAXENA A, SUN Min, NG A Y . Learning 3 -D scene structure from a single still image[C]//2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. Rio de Janeiro： IEEE, 2007: 1-8

    2007

  139. [150]

    Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): cross -sectional MRI data in young, mid dle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults[J]

    MARCUS D S, WANG T H, PARKER J, et al. Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): cross -sectional MRI data in young, mid dle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults[J]. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2007, 19(9): 1498-1507. The multimodal brain tumor image segmen...

    2007

  140. [152]

    Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi -structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved?[J]

    BERNARD O, LALANDE A, ZOTTI C, et al. Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi -structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved?[J]. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018, 37(11): 2514-2525

    2018

  141. [153]

    Ct images in covid-19 [data set][J]

    AN P, XU S, HARMON S A, et al. Ct images in covid-19 [data set][J]. The cancer imaging archive, 2020, 10: 32

    2020

  142. [154]

    UCID: an uncompressed color image database[C]//Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia 2004

    SCHAEFER G, STICH M. UCID: an uncompressed color image database[C]//Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia 2004. San Jose :SPIE, 2003: 472-480

    2004

  143. [155]

    Low-complexity single -image super -resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding[C]//Proceedings ofthe British Machine Vision Conference

    BEVILACQUA M, ROUMY A, GUILLEMOT C, et al. Low-complexity single -image super -resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding[C]//Proceedings ofthe British Machine Vision Conference. Surrey : British Machine Vision Association, 2012

    2012

  144. [156]

    On single image scale-up using sparse-representations[M]//Curves and Surfaces

    ZEYDE R, ELAD M, PROTTER M. On single image scale-up using sparse-representations[M]//Curves and Surfaces. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 711-730

    2012

  145. [157]

    Sketch -based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset[J]

    MATSUI Y , ITO K, ARAMAKI Y , et al. Sketch -based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset[J] . Multimedia tools and applications, 2017, 76(20): 21811-21838

    2017

  146. [158]

    Generalized assorted pixel camera: postcapture control of resolution, dynamic range, and spectrum[J], 2010, 19(9): 2241-2253

    YASUMA F, MITSUNAGA T, ISO D, et al. Generalized assorted pixel camera: postcapture control of resolution, dynamic range, and spectrum[J], 2010, 19(9): 2241-2253. 第 1 期 田春伟，等：文章题名 ·31·

    2010

  147. [159]

    Real-world noisy image denoising: a new benchmark[EB/OL]

    XU Jun, LI Hui, LIANG Zhetong, et al. Real-world noisy image denoising: a new benchmark[EB/OL]. 2018: 1804.02603. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02603v1

    2018 arXiv

  148. [160]

    The 2018 PIRM challenge on perceptual image super -resolution[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops

    BLAU Y , MECHREZ R, TIMOFTE R, et al. The 2018 PIRM challenge on perceptual image super -resolution[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 334-355

    2018

  149. [161]

    MARTIN D, FOWLKES C, TAL D, et al. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and meas uring ecological statistics[C]//Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001. Vancouver：IEEE, 20...

    2001

  150. [162]

    Geometric function theory and nonlinear analysis[M]

    IWANIEC T, MARTIN G. Geometric function theory and nonlinear analysis[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  151. [163]

    Jointly optimized regressors for image super -resolution[J]

    DAI D, TIMOFTE R, V AN GOOL L. Jointly optimized regressors for image super -resolution[J]. Computer graphics forum, 2015, 34(2): 95-104

    2015

  152. [164]

    Deep learning face attributes in the wild[C]//2015 IEEE Int ernational Conference on Computer Vision

    LIU Ziwei, LUO Ping, WANG Xiaogang, et al. Deep learning face attributes in the wild[C]//2015 IEEE Int ernational Conference on Computer Vision. Santiago ： IEEE, 2015: 3730-3738

    2015

  153. [165]

    The pascal visual object classes challenge: a retrospective[J]

    EVERINGHAM M, ALI ESLAMI S M, V AN GOOL L, et al. The pascal visual object classes challenge: a retrospective[J]. International journal of computer vision, 2015, 111(1): 98-136

    2015

  154. [166]

    Ntire 2018 challenge on single image super -resolution: Methods and results[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    TIMOFTE R, GU Shuhang, WU Jiqing, et al. Ntire 2018 challenge on single image super -resolution: Methods and results[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 2018: 852-863

    2018

  155. [167]

    DSLR-quality photos on mobile devices with deep convolutional networks[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

    IGNATOV A, KOBYSHEV N, TIMOFTE R, et al. DSLR-quality photos on mobile devices with deep convolutional networks[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice ： IEEE, 2017: 3297-3305

    2017

  156. [168]

    Semantic understanding of scenes through the ADE20K dataset[J]

    ZHOU Bolei, ZHAO Hang, PUIG X, et al. Semantic understanding of scenes through the ADE20K dataset[J]. International journal of computer vision, 2019, 127(3): 302-321

    2019

  157. [169]

    Toward real-world single image super-resolution: a new benchmark and a new model[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    CAI Jianrui, ZENG Hui, YONG Hongwei, et al. Toward real-world single image super-resolution: a new benchmark and a new model[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Seoul：IEEE, 2019: 3086-3095

    2019

  158. [170]

    Component divide-and-conquer for real -world image super-resolution[M]//Computer Vision –ECCV 2020

    WEI Pengxu, XIE Ziwei, LU Hannan, et al. Component divide-and-conquer for real -world image super-resolution[M]//Computer Vision –ECCV 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 101-117

    2020

  159. [171]

    Image quality metrics: PSNR vs

    HORÉ A, ZIOU D. Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM[C]//2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Istanbul：IEEE, 2010: 2366-2369

    2010

  160. [172]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]

    WANG Zhou, BOVIK A C, SHEIKH H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612

    2004

  161. [173]

    Fast, accurate, and lightweight super -resolution with cas cading residual network[C]// Computer Vision –ECCV 2018

    AHN N, KANG B, SOHN K A. Fast, accurate, and lightweight super -resolution with cas cading residual network[C]// Computer Vision –ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 256-272

    2018

  162. [174]

    Lightweight image super -resolution with enhanced CNN[J]

    TIAN Chunwei, ZHUGE Ruibin, WU Zhihao, et al. Lightweight image super -resolution with enhanced CNN[J]. Knowledge-based systems, 2020, 205: 106235. 作者简介： 田春伟， 教授， 博士生导师， 主要研究方向为图像复原和识 别、图像生成。发表论文 80 余篇，6 篇 ESI 高被引论文，3 篇 ESI 热点论文、4 篇顶刊封面论文、1 篇国际模式识别会 刊 Pattern Recognition 的 Bes...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.