Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Proposed experiments for detecting contextual hidden variables

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes two modified Bell experiments that could detect contextual hidden variables underlying quantum mechanics, and argues that such variables are inevitable if quantum mechanics and general relativity are unified.

desk verdict Proposes two cheap Bell experiments and new hydrodynamic simulations, but the 'inevitability' argument for contextual hidden variables rests on a logical non-sequitur. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02637 v2 pith:RHOLGJEB submitted 2025-06-03 quant-ph

Konstantinos Papatryfonos , Louis Vervoort This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords contextualhiddenvariablesBelltestpilot-wavehydrodynamicsmeasurementindependencesuperdeterminismsuperluminalsignalingquantumfoundationsexperimentalproposal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the hidden variables excluded by Bell's theorem may exist after all, provided they are contextual, meaning their values depend on the measurement settings of the experiment. The case is motivated by hydrodynamic droplet systems that mimic quantum effects and violate a Bell inequality through exactly this kind of contextuality. On that basis, the paper proposes two photon experiments: a cooled Bell test that looks for the Bell correlation M(α,α) to approach 1 as temperature approaches absolute zero, and a fast-switching Bell test that extends current searches for a faster-than-light pilot wave. It also claims that contextual hidden variables are 'physics as usual' if quantum mechanics and general relativity are unified, since a unified theory would presumably be local and would therefore need to violate measurement independence to reproduce quantum correlations. If the proposal is right, Bell's theorem no longer rules out local hidden variables, and exploratory experiments in quantum foundations gain a concrete target.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Bell correlation function M(α,β), evaluated at equal settings M(α,α), whose value the hydrodynamic simulations show depends on the spread Δλ of initial droplet positions; the paper extrapolates this dependence to a temperature dependence M(α,α)→1 as T→0 in photon sources and detectors. The second piece of machinery is the reductive scheme λ* → λ → quantum mechanics, which makes contextual hidden variables a calculable effective theory while the common-cause variables λ* remain permanently inaccessible, just as molecular dynamics sits beneath statistical mechanics. Contextuality is defined as violation of statistical independence, P(λ|a,b) = P(λ), and is what lets the proposed theories dodge Bell's theorem without invoking nonlocality.

What would settle it

Run the proposed cooled Bell experiment: prepare polarization-entangled photon pairs at a series of temperatures from near 0 K upward and measure $M(\alpha,\alpha)$ for several analyzer settings $\alpha$, while confirming the singlet state is unchanged. If the correlation remains exactly 1 at every accessible temperature, the predicted temperature signature of hidden variables is absent, and the empirical motivation for the first experiment collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that contextual hidden-variable theories, in which the distribution of hidden variables λ depends on the analyzer settings (P(λ|a,b) ≠ P(λ)), can reproduce quantum mechanics while remaining local and non-conspiratorial. The paper argues that if everything is physical, there exist common-cause variables λ* that correlate λ with the settings, but these can be ignored in practice because an intermediate, calculable λ-theory—like statistical mechanics above thermodynamics—does the theoretical work. Bell's theorem is thereby bypassed without superluminal signals or retrocausality. The paper proposes two experiments—a cooled Bell test in which M(α,α) should approach 1 as the temperature of source and detectors approaches zero if hidden variables have a temperature-controlled spread, and a fast-switching Bell test extending the search for superluminal pilot-wave signals beyond $10^{4}$ times the speed of light—as ways to look for such sub-quantum degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

The cooled Bell experiment rests on the untested assumption that if contextual hidden variables exist, their spread is controlled by temperature—so that at absolute zero the Bell correlation $M(\alpha,\alpha)$ would approach 1—and the paper gives no mechanism for that coupling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the cooled Bell experiment shows M(α,α) rising toward 1 as the temperature approaches zero, it would directly indicate that measurement settings are not independent of hidden variables, with no need for superluminal signals.
  • If the fast-switching tests observe a breakdown in Bell violation at some combination of distance and switching speed, that would point to an exchange mechanism at a finite superluminal speed and would support the pilot-wave picture.
  • If the theoretical argument is correct, then any successful unification of quantum mechanics with general relativity should yield a local, contextual hidden-variable structure, making the proposed experiments indirect tests of unification.
  • Placing contextual hidden-variable theories on the same footing as statistical mechanics makes constructing such theories a legitimate research program rather than a fringe exercise.
  • A null result in the cooled experiment would not refute contextual hidden variables generally, but it would exclude the specific temperature-controlled spread mechanism the paper proposes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the temperature-dependence proposal could be sharpened into a quantitative prediction by measuring the second-order coherence of a parametric down-conversion source at millikelvin temperatures to see whether any hidden parameter's marginal distribution narrows as the temperature falls.
  • The same reasoning that makes contextuality 'physics as usual' for a quantum-gravity unification applies to any local theory that reproduces quantum correlations, so the argument transfers to other speculative local hidden-variable program lines that do not yet aim at unification.
  • A natural testable extension is to vary the spectral or temporal width of the down-converted photon modes as a stand-in for Δλ, since that width is experimentally controllable and may play the role of the hidden-variable spread without requiring cryogenics.
  • The fast-switching experiment could be adapted to entanglement-swapping configurations, where any pilot-wave signal would have to propagate between distant measurement stations; a null result there would constrain the wave speed more tightly than current direct photon tests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes two modified Bell-type experiments motivated by hydrodynamic pilot-wave systems. The first is a 'cooled Bell experiment' in which the temperature of the photon source and/or detectors is varied, with the expectation that if contextual hidden variables exist then M(α,α)→1 as T→0. The second is a 'fast-switching Bell experiment' aimed at probing superluminal signaling by extending earlier speed-of-nonlocality bounds. The paper also argues, in Section 4, that contextual hidden variables are inevitable if quantum mechanics and general relativity can be unified, and that such theories can bypass Bell's theorem in a local, non-conspiratorial way. The authors explicitly state that the experiments are exploratory and do not provide precise numerical predictions.

Significance. If the inevitability argument were sound, the paper would provide a significant reframing of Bell violations as evidence for contextual hidden variables rather than nonlocality, and the proposed experiments would be inexpensive, falsifiable probes of that hypothesis. The paper is transparent about its speculative character and does not fit parameters to data, which is commendable. However, the central theoretical claim is not established: the key inference in Section 4 from common causes to measurement dependence is a non-sequitur, and the experimental motivation in Section 3 rests on an unmotivated temperature-coupling assumption. The proposals may still be valuable as exploratory null tests, but the paper's stated justification for them needs substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (4.5)] The inequality P(λ|a,b) ≠ P(λ) is asserted to follow from the existence of common-cause variables λ*. This does not follow. A common cause can induce statistical dependence, but it need not: for example, if λ*=(u,v) with u and v independent, λ=u, and (a,b)=v, then P(λ|a,b)=P(λ) even though λ and (a,b) share the common cause λ*. The equality in Eq. (4.5) is just the law of total probability; the inequality requires an additional assumption about correlations in the initial state, and the paper supplies no such assumption. Consequently, the central claim that contextual hidden variables are 'inevitable' under unification is not established, and the 'non-conspiratorial' characterization is also unsupported, since reproducing the needed correlations would require fine-tuning of λ*. The argument can at most support a possibility claim unless the missing assumption is added and justified.
  2. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.2)] The cooled Bell experiment rests on the unstated assumption that lowering the temperature of the source and/or detectors reduces the spread of hypothetical hidden variables, so that M(α,α)→1 as T→0. No physical model, order-of-magnitude estimate, or empirical analogue is offered for such a coupling. In the hydrodynamic simulations, Δλ is the spread of initial droplet positions, and the observed M(Δλ) dependence arises from the chaotic classical dynamics of the droplets; nothing in that analogy transfers to a thermal variable of a photon source. Without a concrete mechanism, Eq. (3.2) is not a falsifiable prediction of a hidden-variable theory but an unmotivated conjecture. The experiment may still be worth doing as an exploratory null test, but the motivation should be stated as such.
  3. [Section 3.1, singlet baseline] The text following Eq. (3.2) states that 'as long as cooling does not change the singlet state, one has M(α,α) = 1 for all α'. This is incorrect: for a singlet state and equal settings, the outcomes are perfectly anti-correlated, so M(α,α) = -1 with the correlation function defined in Eq. (2.3). Since the proposed criterion is 'any deviation from M = 1 not explained by quantum mechanics', the baseline must be corrected to -1, or the correlation function must be defined with an explicit sign convention. This affects the interpretation of any observed deviation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (4.5)] The displayed formula is missing a multiplication symbol: it should read P(λ|a,b) = Σ_{λ*} P(λ|a,b,λ*) P(λ*|a,b), with the summation over λ* made unambiguous.
  2. [Section 1] The use of 'contextual' to mean violation of statistical independence in Eq. (4.1) is nonstandard and risks confusion with Bell-Kochen-Specker contextuality, which concerns value assignments depending on which commuting observables are measured. Please clarify the relation between these notions.
  3. [Section 2.2] The statement that the limited number of high-precision numerical results are 'well representative of the dynamics' is not supported by a convergence or stability analysis; please provide quantitative details or error estimates for the representative cases.
  4. [Section 3.2] The proposal to probe higher superluminal speeds would be strengthened by specifying a concrete distance-and-switching combination that would improve on the existing bounds of about 10^4 c, rather than only suggesting that technological progress now permits this.
  5. [Introduction] There is a typo in 'supperradiance' in the first paragraph; it should be 'superradiance'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Section 4's 'inevitability' of contextual hidden variables is partially circular: Eq. (4.5) assumes the very measurement-independence violation it claims to derive, and the core scheme is imported from the authors' own prior work [41].

  1. self definitional [Section 4, Eq. (4.5) and the following sentence]
    "The inequality in (4.5) follows from the fact that λ and (a,b) are correlated by common causes: the λ*."

    The target inequality in (4.5) is P(λ|a,b) ≠ P(λ), which is precisely the statement that λ and (a,b) are statistically dependent, i.e. correlated. The paper's justification asserts as a 'fact' that λ and (a,b) are correlated by common causes λ*. That assertion already contains the conclusion the inequality is supposed to establish. A common cause of two variables does not by itself imply their marginal dependence, so the derivation cannot go through without an additional assumption; the paper's wording simply assumes the correlation it needs. Thus the 'inevitability' of contextual hidden variables is not derived from the reductive scheme and the law of total probability alone; it is inserted as the premise.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 4, paragraph after Eq. (4.1); reference [41]]
    "However, recent work suggests that (4.1) can be violated while avoiding the incalculability of hard-core superdeterminism (we follow Nikolaev and Vervoort [41]). ... More details about this interpretation can be found in [41]."

    The entire three-step reductive scheme (4.2)-(4.6) and the 'soft superdeterminism' interpretation that carries the paper's central claim are attributed to Nikolaev and Vervoort [41], whose second author is the present paper's second author. The cited work is not machine-checked, code-reproduced, or externally benchmarked; it is a philosophical proposal by the same authors that itself presupposes the naturalness of violating measurement independence. The present paper adds no independent derivation beyond repeating that scheme and citing [41] for details, so the key theoretical conclusion—that contextual hidden variables are inevitable—rests on a self-citation chain rather than on an external or independently verified result.

full rationale

The experimental proposals in Sections 2 and 3 are not circular in the narrow sense: the hydrodynamic simulations use an existing model [14] over a new parameter range, no parameters are fitted to quantum data, and the proposed cooled and fast-switching Bell tests are falsifiable against quantum mechanics. However, the paper's central theoretical justification in Section 4, which is presented as showing that contextual hidden variables are inevitable if quantum mechanics and general relativity unify, contains a concrete circular step. Equation (4.5) claims P(λ|a,b) ≠ P(λ), and the accompanying text says this 'follows from the fact that λ and (a,b) are correlated by common causes'. That is exactly the correlation the inequality asserts; the premise already contains the conclusion, so the derivation reduces to an assumption. The load-bearing scheme is also imported from the authors' own prior work [41], which is not an independent source and itself incorporates the target claim. For these reasons the paper is partially circular: the experimental content has independent merit, but the advertised inevitability result is forced by an assumed correlation and by self-citation, not derived. Score 6 reflects this partial but substantive circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data. The simulations use parameters chosen to represent a specific hydrodynamic system, but these are not adjusted to match quantum predictions. The central claim is a philosophical/experimental proposal, not a quantitative derivation.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The hydrodynamic pilot-wave system is a valid analog of quantum mechanical contextuality.
    The paper's experimental proposals are motivated by this analogy, but it is an extrapolation from classical fluid dynamics to quantum systems.
  • standard math Bell's theorem and the Bell inequality are correct under the assumptions of locality and statistical independence.
    The paper uses Bell's inequality as a reference and argues that contextual HVTs violate statistical independence.
  • standard math The law of total probability applies to the hidden variable hierarchy, P(λ|a,b) = Σ P(λ|a,b,λ*) P(λ*|a,b).
    Used in Eq. (4.5) to derive statistical dependence from common causes.
  • domain assumption If quantum mechanics and general relativity can be unified, the unified theory's fundamental variables are local.
    Assumed in Section 4 to infer that contextual hidden variables would be natural. No derivation from known physics is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The premise that 'everything is physical' entails the existence of λ* common-cause variables.
    Introduced specifically to argue that violation of statistical independence is non-conspiratorial; it is a metaphysical assumption without empirical support.
invented entities (1)
  • λ* (common-cause variables of a Theory of Everything)
    purpose: To explain the violation of statistical independence P(λ|a,b)=P(λ) in a local, non-conspiratorial way.
    Postulated as inaccessible and incalculable; no falsifiable handle outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Proposed experiments for detecting contextual hidden variables." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RHOLGJEB

@misc{pith2026250602637,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Proposed experiments for detecting contextual hidden variables},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RHOLGJEB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02637}
}
read the original abstract

We propose two quantum experiments - modified Bell tests - that could detect contextual hidden variables underlying quantum mechanics. The experiments are inspired by hydrodynamic pilot-wave systems that mimic a wide range of quantum effects and exhibit a classical analog of contextuality. To justify the experiments, we show that contextual hidden variables are 'physics as usual' if a unification between quantum mechanics and general relativity is possible. Accordingly, contextual theories can bypass Bell's theorem in a way that is both local and non-conspiratorial. We end with a note on the relevance of exploratory experiments in the foundations of quantum physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02637 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of a hydrodynamic Bell test (adapted from Papatryfonos et al. [14]). The system comprises two droplets (red and green) walking on the surface of a vibrating liquid bath (blue) over a solid substrate (grey). Each droplet is confined within a subsystem consisting of a pair of cavities separated by barriers, across which the droplets tunnel unpredictably. The tunneling rate is influenced by the barrier depths… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bell correlation function M(α,α) (= 0.099 cm) as a function of the range  of the initial droplet positions, for measurement time Tm = 1000 TF. Error bars are indicated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bell correlation function M(α,α) ( = 0.099 cm) as a function of the range  of the initial droplet positions, for measurement time Tm = 400 TF. Error bars are indicated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bell correlation function M(α,α) as a function of  for L = 1 and for measurement time Tm = 1200 TF. Error bars are indicated. In the next section we exploit these findings to propose a new quantum experiment. 3. Proposed quantum experiments 3.1. Cooled Bell experim…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Static Bell test in pilot-wave hydrodynamics,

    K. Papatryfonos, L. Vervoort, A. Nachbin, M. Labousse, J. W. M. Bush, “Static Bell test in pilot-wave hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Fluids, 9, 084001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Single particle diffraction and interference at a macroscopic scale

    Y. Couder, and E. Fort, “Single particle diffraction and interference at a macroscopic scale”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 154101 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [2]

    Walking droplets interacting with single and double slits

    G. Pucci, D. M. Harris, L. M. Faria, and J. W. M. Bush, “Walking droplets interacting with single and double slits”, J. Fluid Mech. 835, 1136 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Unpredictable tunneling of a classical wave -particle association

    A. Eddi, E. Fort, F. Moisy, and Y. Couder, “Unpredictable tunneling of a classical wave -particle association”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 240401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    Quantum-like behavior of an active particle in a double-well potential,

    R. N. Valani, and A.G López, “Quantum-like behavior of an active particle in a double-well potential,” Chaos, 186, 115253 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [5]

    Self-organization into quantized eigenstates of a classical wave-driven particle

    S. Perrard, M. Labousse, M. Miskin, E. Fort, and Y. Couder, “Self-organization into quantized eigenstates of a classical wave-driven particle”, Nat. Commun. 5, 3219 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [6]

    Minimal Quantization Model in Pilot -Wave Hydrodynamics

    A. M. Blitstein, R. R. Rosales, and P. J. Sáenz, “Minimal Quantization Model in Pilot -Wave Hydrodynamics”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 104003 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    Wavelike statistics from pilot-wave dynamics in a circular corral,

    D. M. Harris, J. Moukhtar, E. Fort, Y. Couder, & J. W. M. Bush, “Wavelike statistics from pilot-wave dynamics in a circular corral,” Phys. Rev. E 88, 1–5 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Faraday pilot -wave dynamics in a circular c orral,

    M. Durey, P. A. Milewski, & Z. Wang, “Faraday pilot -wave dynamics in a circular c orral,” J. Fluid Mech. 891, A3 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    Hong -Ou-Mandel-like two-droplet correlations,

    R. N. Valani, A.C. Slim, & T. Simula, “Hong -Ou-Mandel-like two-droplet correlations,” Chaos 28, 096104 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    Superradiant droplet emission from parametrically excited cavities,

    V. Frumkin, J. W. M. Bush, and K. Papatryfonos, “Superradiant droplet emission from parametrically excited cavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 130, 064002 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    Hydrodynamic superradiance in wave-mediated cooperative tunneling,

    K. Papatryfonos, M. Ruelle, C. Bourdiol, A. Nachbin, J. W.M. Bush, and M. Labousse, “Hydrodynamic superradiance in wave-mediated cooperative tunneling,” Commun. Phys. 5, 142, (2022)

    2022

  5. [12]

    Superradiant droplet emission from a single hydrodynamic cavity near a reflective boundary,

    K. Pap atryfonos, J. W. Schroder, and V. Frumkin, “Superradiant droplet emission from a single hydrodynamic cavity near a reflective boundary,” arXiv: 2408.02620 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Anderson localizati on of walking droplets,

    A. J. Abraham, S. Malkov, F. A. Ljubetic, M. Durey, and P. J. Saenz, “Anderson localizati on of walking droplets,” Phys. Rev. X, 14(3), 031047 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    The state of play in Hydrodynamic Quantum Analogs,

    J. W. M. Bush, K. Papatryfonos, and V. Frumkin, “The state of play in Hydrodynamic Quantum Analogs,” In: Castro, P., Bush, J.W.M., Croca, J. (eds) Advances in Pilot Wave Theory. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 344. Springer, Cham (2024). 16

    2024

  8. [16]

    Perspectives on pilot-wave hydrodynamics,

    J. W. M. Bush, V. Frumkin, and P.J. Sáenz, “Perspectives on pilot-wave hydrodynamics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 030503 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Kochen-Specker contextuality,

    C. Budroni, A. Cabello, O. Gühne, M. Kleinmann, J.-Å. Larsson, “Kochen-Specker contextuality,” arXiv:2102.13036 [quant-ph] (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell,

    N. D. Mermin, “Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell,” Reviews Mod. Physics 65, 803 (1993)

    1993

  11. [19]

    Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation,

    M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch, & J. Emerson, “Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation,” Nature, 510(7505), 351-355 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Testing the speed of ’spooky action at a distance’,

    D. Salart, A. Baas, C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, “Testing the speed of ’spooky action at a distance’,” Nature 454, 861–864 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Lower bound on the speed of nonlocal correlations without locality and measurement choice loopholes,

    J. Yin, Y. Cao, H.-L.Yong, J.-G. Ren, H. Liang, S.-K. Liao, F. Zhou, C. Liu, Y.-P. Wu, G.-S. Pan, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, Q. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, “Lower bound on the speed of nonlocal correlations without locality and measurement choice loopholes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110,...

    2013

  14. [22]

    La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement,

    L. de Broglie, “La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement,” J. Phys. Radium, 8, 225–241 (1927)

    1927

  15. [23]

    A Time-(Anti) symmetric Approach to the Double Solution Theory,

    P. Jamet, and A. Drezet, “A Time-(Anti) symmetric Approach to the Double Solution Theory,” Foundations 5.1: 1 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Pilot-wave hydrodynamics,

    J. W. M. Bush. “Pilot-wave hydrodynamics,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    A mechanical analog of Bohr’s atom based on de Broglie’s double-solution approach,

    P. Jamet, and A. Drezet, "A mechanical analog of Bohr’s atom based on de Broglie’s double-solution approach," Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 31, 10 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    A time-symmetric soliton dynamics à la de Broglie,

    A. Drezet, “A time-symmetric soliton dynamics à la de Broglie,” Found. Phys. 53, 72 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Whence nonlocality? Removing spooky action-at-a-distance from the de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory using a time-symmetric version of the de Broglie double solution,

    A. Drezet, “Whence nonlocality? Removing spooky action-at-a-distance from the de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory using a time-symmetric version of the de Broglie double solution,” Symmetry 16, 8 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,

    G. ’t Hooft, “The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” (Fundamental Theories of Physics, 185), Springer Open (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Fast Vacuum Fluctuations and the Emergence of Quantum Mechanics,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Fast Vacuum Fluctuations and the Emergence of Quantum Mechanics,” arXiv:2010.02019 [quant-ph] (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Toy model for local and deterministic wave-function collapse,

    S. Donadi, and S. Hossenfelder, “Toy model for local and deterministic wave-function collapse,” Phys. Rev. A 106(2), 022212 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    The emerging quantum. The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics,

    L. De la Peña, A. M. Cetto, & A. Valdés -Hernández, “The emerging quantum. The Physics Behind Quantum Mechanics,” Cham: Springer International Publishing (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Report of the topical group on particle dark matter for Snowmass,

    J. Cooley, et al., “Report of the topical group on particle dark matter for Snowmass,”arXiv:2209.07426 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Are Hidden-Variable Theories for Pilot-Wave Systems Possible?,

    L. Vervoort, “Are Hidden-Variable Theories for Pilot-Wave Systems Possible?,” Found. Phys. 48:7, 803-826 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Walking droplets correlated at a distance

    A. Nachbin, “Walking droplets correlated at a distance”, Chaos 28, 096110 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Tunneling with a hydrodynamic pilot-wave model,

    A. Nachbin, P. A. Milewski, and J. W. M. Bush, “Tunneling with a hydrodynamic pilot-wave model,” Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 034801 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Faraday pilot-wave dynamics: modelling and computation,

    P. A. Milewski, C. A. Galeano-Rios, A. Nachbin, and J. W. M. Bush, “Faraday pilot-wave dynamics: modelling and computation,” J. Fluid Mech. 778, 361 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Modelling two-dimensional droplet rebound off deep fluid baths,

    K. A. Phillips, R. Cimpeanu, and P. A. Milewski, “Modelling two-dimensional droplet rebound off deep fluid baths,” Proc. R. Soc. A 481, 20240956 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Topological Nanophononic Interface States Using High-order Bandgaps in the One-Dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Model,

    A. Rodriguez, K. Papatryfonos, E. Cardozo de Oliveira, and N. D. Lanzillotti -Kimura, “Topological Nanophononic Interface States Using High-order Bandgaps in the One-Dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Model,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 205301 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Testing super-deterministic hidden variables theories,

    S. Hossenfelder, “Testing super-deterministic hidden variables theories,” Found. Phys. 41, 1521 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    Possibility of faster-than-light particles,

    G. Feinberg, “Possibility of faster-than-light particles,” Phys. Rev. 159, 1089–1105 (1967)

    1967

  33. [41]

    Aspects of Superdeterminism Made Intuitive,

    V. Nikolaev, L. Vervoort, “Aspects of Superdeterminism Made Intuitive,” Found. Phys. 53, 17 (2023). 17

    2023

  34. [42]

    Superdeterminism: a reappraisal,

    G. Andreoletti, & L. Vervoort, “Superdeterminism: a reappraisal,” Synthese, 200(5), 361 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    On superdeterministic rejections of settings independence,

    G. S. Ciepielewski, E. Okon, & D. Sudarsky, “On superdeterministic rejections of settings independence,” Br. J. Philos. Sci. 74(2), 435-467 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Rethinking superdeterminism,

    S. Hossenfelder, & T. Palmer, “Rethinking superdeterminism,” Frontiers in Physics 8, 139 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    What does the world look like according to superdeterminism?

    A. Baas, & B. Le Bihan, “What does the world look like according to superdeterminism?”, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 74(3), 555-572 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    From statistical dependence to the space of possible superdeterministic theories,

    M. Waegell, and K. J. McQueen, “From statistical dependence to the space of possible superdeterministic theories,” preprint (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Bell’s theorem: two neglected solutions,

    L. Vervoort, "Bell’s theorem: two neglected solutions," Found. Phys. 43.6: 769-791 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    The significance of measurement independence for Bell inequalities and locality,

    M. J. W. Hall, “The significance of measurement independence for Bell inequalities and locality,” At the Frontier of Spacetime, 189-204 [arXiv:1511.00729 [quant-ph]] (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A neglected route to realism about quantum mechanics,

    H. Price, “A neglected route to realism about quantum mechanics,” Mind, 103(411):303–336 (1994)

    1994

  42. [50]

    Two roads to retrocausality,

    E. Adlam, “Two roads to retrocausality,” Synthese 200, 5:422 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?,

    M. S. Leifer, M. F. Pusey, “Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?,” Proc. R. Soc. A 473, 20160607 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    A new class of retrocausal models,

    K. Wharton, “A new class of retrocausal models,” Entropy, 20(6), 410 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Quantum theory at the crossroads: reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference,

    G. Bacciagaluppi, and A. Valentini, “Quantum theory at the crossroads: reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference,” Cambridge University Press (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    Observations of Bell inequality violations with causal isolation between source and detectors,

    M. J. J. Fleury, “Observations of Bell inequality violations with causal isolation between source and detectors,” Entropy, 24(9), 1230 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.