Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 115 references

Liouvillian and Hamiltonian exceptional points of atomic vapors: The spectral signatures of quantum jumps

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quantum jumps, not just dissipation, govern where exceptional points appear in atomic vapors.

desk verdict A well-motivated atomic-vapor application of the hybrid-Liouvillian framework whose central analytic spectrum does not close; needs major revision but deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02902 v2 pith:EVMMJGDD submitted 2025-06-03 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Marek Kopciuch , Adam Miranowicz This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords Liouvillianexceptionalpointsnon-HermitianHamiltonianquantumjumpsatomicvapormasterequationhybridRubidium-87hyperfinelevelspointorder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that spectral singularities of open atomic systems cannot be reliably read off from a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (NHH) when quantum jumps are important. It models an alkali-metal vapor on the $f = 1 \to F = 0$ hyperfine transition of $^{87}$Rb, first with four levels and then reduced to three, and compares the NHH spectrum with the spectrum of the full Liouvillian superoperator that includes jump processes. The comparison shows that quantum jumps can create, destroy, shift, or reorder exceptional points, and a hybrid Liouvillian with a jump-weight parameter $q$ interpolates smoothly between the two descriptions. If the claim is right, any experiment or sensor design based on exceptional points in atomic vapors must go beyond the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian picture.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hybrid Liouvillian superoperator $\hat{\hat L}(q) = -i[\hat H_{\rm NH},\rho] + q \sum_\mu \hat L_\mu \rho \hat L_\mu^\dagger$, where $q \in [0,1]$ is the quantum-jump parameter: $q = 0$ reproduces the NHH superoperator and $q = 1$ the full Liouvillian. The effective three-level NHH $\hat H_{\rm NH} = \hat H_g - \frac{2i\Omega_R^2}{\Gamma - 2i\Delta}|10\rangle\langle 10|$ is obtained from the four-level system by the effective-operator formalism of Ref. [94], which eliminates the excited state under the assumption of fast excited-state relaxation. In the superoperator basis, the only structural difference between the NHH and the Liouvillian is the last row, which encodes the repopulation (quantum-jump) term and guarantees trace preservation; this single difference is what turns a third-order HEP into a second-order LEP.

What would settle it

Perform quantum process tomography on the $f = 1 \to F = 0$ transition of a room-temperature $^{87}$Rb vapor at the predicted detuned EP3 parameters $\delta = 2\Omega/(3\sqrt{3})$ and $J = 4\Omega/(3\sqrt{3})$; if the reconstructed Liouvillian spectrum shows a third-order exceptional point, or matches the NHH superoperator spectrum, the claim that quantum jumps reduce the degeneracy order at that point is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the NHH approach alone is insufficient for atomic systems with repopulation dynamics. For the $f = 1 \to F = 0$ transition, the reduced three-level NHH develops a third-order exceptional point when the RF field is tuned, while the full Liouvillian spectrum at the same parameters contains only a second-order LEP, the lifted splitting approaching $\tfrac{4}{3}\Omega q$ at large $J$. In the RF-detuned regime, an EP3 of the NHH at $\delta = \pm 2\Omega/(3\sqrt{3})$, $J = 4\Omega/(3\sqrt{3})$ is accompanied by a full ninefold collapse of the NHH superoperator spectrum, whereas the Liouvillian spectrum shows a markedly reduced degeneracy. The authors conclude that the inclusion of quantum jumps fundamentally alters the spectral structure of the system, and that reliable predictions require the Liouvillian formalism.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions rest on the effective three-level model being faithful: the excited state must relax much faster than the ground state evolves and the optical coupling must be weak, otherwise the effective NHH and Liouvillian spectra do not represent the real four-level atom.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At parameters where the NHH predicts a third-order HEP, the full Liouvillian spectrum has only second-order LEPs, so unconditional atomic-vapor dynamics will not show the NHH-predicted EP3.
  • In the detuned regime, the NHH superoperator predicts a collapse of all nine eigenvalues while the Liouvillian does not, giving a sharp experimental signature of quantum jumps.
  • Tuning the decay into an unobserved hyperfine manifold changes the effective $q$, so partial monitoring of quantum jumps can continuously alter the observed exceptional-point structure.
  • Quantum process tomography adapted to room-temperature alkali vapors can reconstruct the Liouvillian and directly reveal LEPs, extending the QPT-based observation of LEPs from superconducting circuits to atomic platforms.
  • For atomic systems with particle-number conservation, repopulation terms are unavoidable, so NHH-based predictions of exceptional points in atomic ensembles should be re-examined in terms of Liouvillian exceptional points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same jump-induced reordering of exceptional points should appear in any open system with strong incoherent refilling, such as optically or electrically pumped gain media, where the pump strength plays the role of $q$.
  • The hybrid parameter $q$ makes detection efficiency or postselection fidelity a spectral parameter, so measuring the splitting between the lifted eigenvalues could serve as a quantitative probe of the fraction of unmonitored quantum jumps.
  • A natural testable extension is to scan other hyperfine transitions, where the Wigner 3j coefficients change the relative jump amplitudes; the mismatch between HEPs and LEPs may then be enhanced or suppressed in a systematic way.
  • If the effective three-level reduction is relaxed, the exact four-level Liouvillian at the predicted EP3 parameters may contain additional higher-order degeneracies, which would bound the validity of the effective-operator reduction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies spectral degeneracies (exceptional points) in an effective three-level model of an alkali-metal atomic vapor (f=1→F=0) driven by RF and optical fields. It compares the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (NHH) with that of the Lindblad Liouvillian and its hybrid q-interpolation. The central claims are that (i) at zero RF detuning the NHH superoperator exhibits a third-order EP that is lifted by quantum jumps to a second-order LEP; (ii) with RF detuning, the NHH exhibits an EP3 at a critical point while the full Liouvillian reduces or removes it; and (iii) quantum jumps can change the existence, location, or order of spectral degeneracies. The paper contains an effective-operator derivation, explicit 9×9 superoperator matrices, analytical spectra, numerical figures, and an experimental proposal based on quantum process tomography.

Significance. If the central claims were established, the paper would provide a concrete atomic-vapor demonstration that NHH-based EP predictions can fail when quantum jumps (repopulation) are included, with implications for EP-based sensing in room-temperature vapors. The manuscript's strengths are its use of a well-founded hybrid-Liouvillian formalism, the connection to an existing experiment [49], explicit superoperator matrices, and a concrete QPT-based detection proposal. However, the main analytical spectrum is internally inconsistent with the paper's own q=0 limit (see major comments), and no code or data are provided to verify the numerical figures. The order-changing claim is therefore not currently supported by the analytic work, and the numerical results alone cannot be checked.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV.D, Eq. (29)] Substituting q=0 into Eq. (29) gives φ=27s^2, ν=0, ζ=φ^{3/2}, with s=√(2J^2−Ω^2). The last three eigenvalues then evaluate to a set that is not the set {−2α1, −2α1*, −2Ω} of Eq. (31); for example, in the limit s→0 (i.e., J=Ω/√2) they approach −9Ω rather than −2Ω. Hence Eq. (29) is not the spectrum of the matrix in Eq. (27) at q=0. Because Eq. (33) and the claim that a small q lifts the EP3 are derived from Eq. (29), the analytical backbone of the central example is unsupported. The numerical figures do not fill this gap unless code or data are supplied; please correct Eq. (29) (the denominator in −φ/(3√ζ) should presumably be a cube root of ζ) and verify the formula by exact diagonalization of Eq. (27).
  2. [§V.C, Jordan-chain claim] The statement that 'the analysis of the Jordan chain reveals the presence of only three linearly independent eigenvectors, indicating the existence of at least two HEPs of orders 3 and 5' is not supported by any displayed calculation. A 9×9 matrix with a single eigenvalue and three eigenvectors is compatible with several Jordan-block structures, such as (5,3,1), (4,3,2), or (3,3,3), so the stated EP orders do not follow from three independent eigenvectors alone. If this example is to support the abstract's claim that the EP order differs between the NHH and Liouvillian descriptions, the actual Jordan normal form must be presented explicitly.
  3. [§V.A, Eq. (36)] The characteristic polynomial is typeset with the constant term −2iΩδ, but the consistency conditions in Eqs. (37)–(39) and the condition x0^3=−2Ωδ^2 require a constant term −2iΩδ^2. As written, Eq. (36) is dimensionally inconsistent and cannot yield the EP3 location in Eq. (40). This typo should be corrected, and the derivation of Eqs. (37)–(40) should be rechecked.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§IV.D, Eq. (28)] Equation (28) appears to be missing an equals sign or separator between the two identities for L̂(0) and L̂(1); as typeset it reads as a single equation.
  2. [§IV.D, Eq. (27)] The 9×9 matrix in Eq. (27) has several garbled entries (notably rows 3, 8, and 9). Since this matrix is central to the spectral analysis, it should be typeset unambiguously so that the reader can verify the subsequent eigenvalue formulas.
  3. [§IV, parameters] The units of Ω, J, and δ are not stated. The caption of Fig. 2 gives Γ=2π×5.7×10^6 and Ω=30, but the unit of Ω (presumably MHz) should be specified explicitly.
  4. [§IV.D, Eq. (31)] The identification of an EP3 at J=Ω/√2 is based on the degeneracy of three eigenvalues; to justify calling it a third-order exceptional point, the geometric multiplicity and Jordan-block structure should be stated, not just the eigenvalue coincidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model inputs are physical, the effective-operator and hybrid-Liouvillian formalisms are external and parameter-free, and the claimed HEP/LEP spectral differences are computed from explicitly given matrices rather than assumed.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and the central claims are computed outputs rather than inputs. The model parameters — RF Rabi frequency J, reduced optical Rabi frequency Ω = Ω_R²/Γ, RF detuning δ, and the 87Rb D2 linewidth Γ = 2π × 5.746 MHz — are physical inputs taken from experiment (Secs. IV and V), not fitted constants, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. The reduction to the effective three-level model uses the Reiter–Sørensen effective-operator formalism (Ref. [94]), whose stated validity assumptions (Markovianity, perturbative ground–excited coupling, separation of timescales; Appendix A) do not include the target conclusion — the existence, location, or order of Liouvillian exceptional points — and the paper supplies the detailed reduction (Eqs. (8)–(15)). The hybrid Liouvillian is defined explicitly in Eq. (5), and its q = 0 and q = 1 limits follow structurally from Eq. (28); the claimed spectral differences (third-order HEP at q = 0 that is lifted for q > 0, with asymptotic splitting (4/3)Ωq in Eq. (33)) are the outcome of diagonalizing the explicitly written 9×9 matrices in Eqs. (27) and (42), not assumptions inserted before the calculation. Self-citations to prior work by co-author Miranowicz (Refs. [54], [56]) supply the LEP concept and the hybrid-Liouvillian interpolation tool, but that formalism is parameter-free, rests on stated postselection assumptions that do not include the paper's atomic-vapor conclusions, and has been independently verified experimentally in circuit QED and trapped-ion platforms (Refs. [35], [62], [64]); under the review rules this citation is real evidence and does not raise the circularity score. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own work, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. An internal-consistency question raised during review — namely, that the closed-form spectrum in Eq. (29) does not obviously reduce to the q = 0 spectrum in Eq. (31) — is a correctness concern about the analytic expression, not a circularity, because the model is defined by the matrix in Eq. (27) and the EP-order claims are reproducible from that matrix by direct numerical diagonalization regardless of the closed-form formula. Verdict: no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, fields, or ad hoc parameters. It relies on standard open quantum system formalism and a specific atomic level model from prior literature.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The Lindblad master equation is the correct description of the open atomic system.
    Used throughout (Eq. 1) as the starting point for both NHH and Liouvillian analyses.
  • domain assumption Effective operator formalism assumptions: Markovian dynamics, perturbative coupling, and clear timescale separation between excited and ground states.
    Appendix A states these requirements for the effective three-level model, which underpins all subsequent results.
  • domain assumption The f=1 to F=0 transition of 87Rb is a valid representative model for the physics.
    The entire paper is built on this level structure, taken from Ref. [49].
  • domain assumption Hyperfine ground-state relaxation can be neglected or treated as isotropic without changing qualitative conclusions.
    Sec. IV C introduces and then omits isotropic relaxation, arguing it only shifts the spectrum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Liouvillian and Hamiltonian exceptional points of atomic vapors: The spectral signatures of quantum jumps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EVMMJGDD

@misc{pith2026250602902,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Liouvillian and Hamiltonian exceptional points of atomic vapors: The spectral signatures of quantum jumps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EVMMJGDD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02902}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate spectral singularities in an alkali-metal atomic vapor modeled using four and effectively three hyperfine states. By comparing the eigenvalue spectra of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (NHH) and a Liouvillian superoperator, we analyze the emergence and characteristics of both semiclassical and quantum exceptional points. Our results reveal that, for atomic systems, the NHH approach alone may be insufficient to fully capture the system's spectral properties. While NHHs can yield accurate predictions in certain regimes, a comprehensive description typically requires the Liouvillian formalism, which governs the Lindblad master equation and explicitly incorporates quantum jump processes responsible for repopulation dynamics. We demonstrate that the inclusion of quantum jumps fundamentally alters the spectral structure of the system. In particular, we present examples in which the existence, location in parameter space, or even the order of spectral degeneracies differ significantly between the two approaches, thereby highlighting the impact of quantum jumps and the limitations of the NHH method. Finally, using the hybrid-Liouvillian formalism, we show how quantum jumps reshape spectral features initially predicted by the NHH, ultimately determining the full Liouvillian spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02902 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Energy-level diagram of the D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Real part of the Liouvillian spectrum for the full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Representative examples of the full spectra of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real part of the hybrid Liouvillian spectra as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic illustration of the physical interpretation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Hamiltonian spectra of the three-level system as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the spectrum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Conceptual schematic of the experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    A. Roy, S. Jahani, C. Langrock, M. Fejer, and A. Marandi, Spectral phase transitions in optical paramet- ric oscillators, Nat. Commun. 12, 835 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    Fol- lowing Ref

    Spontaneous emission As mentioned in the previous section, in the system of interest the only relaxation channel that couples the excited and ground states is spontaneous emission. Fol- lowing Ref. [55], the Lindblad operators describing this process are proportional to the electric-dipole-moment operator governing transitions between the ground and excit...

  3. [2]

    Mathematically, this coupling closely resembles the spontaneous-emission jump operator, as both processes are governed by the same electric-dipole-moment operator, ˆdε

    Raising and lowering operators It is important to note that, in the model under consid- eration, the primary mechanism coupling the ground and excited states is an external light beam. Mathematically, this coupling closely resembles the spontaneous-emission jump operator, as both processes are governed by the same electric-dipole-moment operator, ˆdε. Mor...

  4. [3]

    As shown in Fig

    is particu- larly revealing, as it features three distinct intervals in J, each corresponding to a different dominant dynamical behavior. As shown in Fig. 8(a), for small values of J, the spec- trum approaches that of the Hamiltonian ˆHJ→0 = δ ˆF z, where ˆFi is the angular momentum operator along the i axis. This indicates that the detuning term is domi-...

  5. [4]

    Generalized rotating wave approximation As mentioned in Sec. III, when the system involves several distinct time-dependent interactions, it is often more effective to apply a generalized form of the rotating- wave approximation (R W A) rather than a sequence of standard R W As. This generalized transformation can be implemented using the following unitary...

  6. [5]

    Alternative forms of the master equation It is important to note that different conventions ex- ist for formulating the quantum master equation—also known as the quantum Liouville equation, also known as the Lindblad or Gorini-Kossakowski-Lindblad-Sudarshan (GKLS) equation. In the context of this paper, two com- monly used forms are particularly relevant:...

  7. [6]

    Liouvillians in the generalized Gell-Mann basis Here, we recall how the Liouvillian of a d-level system can be represented in the basis formed by the generalized Gell-Mann matrices, which are also commonly referred to as generalized Pauli matrices, particularly in the context of quantum information. To begin, it is important to note that these matrices, t...

  8. [7]

    Liouvillians in the Liouville-F ock basis Expanding a Liouvillian of d-level system in the gen- eralized Gell-Mann basis is a natural choice, especially from the perspective of experimentally implemented pro- cess tomography. However, this approach can initially seem counterintuitive when the system of interest is not simply a single-spin system—for examp...

Show all 115 references
  1. [8]

    (B5), we establish two key properties: it is repre- sented by an antisymmetric and purely imaginary ma- trix

    Properties of the Hamiltonian superoperator Following the definition of the superoperator ˆˆHij in Eq. (B5), we establish two key properties: it is repre- sented by an antisymmetric and purely imaginary ma- trix. First, we demonstrate the antisymmetry property: ˆˆHij = 1 2 Tr ...

  2. [9]

    Properties of the non-Hermitian coherent part in Liouvillians Analogously, we now establish the key properties of the superoperator ˆˆΓij defined in Eq. (B7). In particular, we show that it is symmetric and real-valued. The symmetry property follows by an argument similar to t...

  3. [10]

    Correspondence between operator and superoperator spectra It is straightforward to observe that a superopera- tor, represented by a d2 × d2 matrix, has d2 eigenval- ues, whereas the underlying Hamiltonian operator from which it is derived possesses only d eigenvalues. This dis...

  4. [11]

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge insightful discussions with Szymon Pustelny, Yujie Sun, and Arash Dezhang Fard

    This behavior highlights the isotropic nature of the relaxation process while ensuring the trace preservation of the density matrix. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge insightful discussions with Szymon Pustelny, Yujie Sun, and Arash Dezhang Fard. This work was support...

    2019

  5. [12]

    Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966)

    T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966)

    1966

  6. [13]

    W. D. Heiss, Repulsion of resonance states and excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. E 61, 929 (2000)

    2000

  7. [14]

    Dembowski, H.-D

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Graf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimental Observation of the Topological Structure of Exceptional Points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787 (2001)

    2001

  8. [15]

    M. V. Berry, Physics of Nonhermitian Degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004)

    2004

  9. [16]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  10. [17]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007). 20

    2007

  11. [18]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 444016 (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater. 18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    Miri and A

    M. Miri and A. Al` u, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  14. [21]

    Parto, Y

    M. Parto, Y. G. N. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: Optics at an exceptional point, Nanophoton- ics 10, 403 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT -symmetry break- ing in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009)

    2009

  16. [23]

    R¨ uter, K

    C. R¨ uter, K. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christo- doulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity- time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys 6, 192 (2010)

    2010

  17. [24]

    Regensburger, C

    A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. On- ishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Parity-time synthetic photonic lattices, Nature (Lon- don) 488, 167 (2012)

    2012

  18. [25]

    Zhen et al., Spawning rings of exceptional points out of Dirac cones, Nature (London) 525, 354 (2015)

    B. Zhen et al., Spawning rings of exceptional points out of Dirac cones, Nature (London) 525, 354 (2015)

    2015

  19. [26]

    K. Ding, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Coalescence of exceptional points and phase diagrams for one- dimensional PT -symmetric photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235310 (2015)

    2015

  20. [27]

    Cerjan, A

    A. Cerjan, A. Raman, and S. Fan, Exceptional con- tours and band structure design in parity-time sym- metric photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 203902 (2016)

    2016

  21. [28]

    L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian pho- tonics based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Photon.11, 752 (2017)

    2017

  22. [29]

    El-Ganainy, M

    R. El-Ganainy, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, The dawn of non-Hermitian optics, Commun. Phys. 2, 1 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Schindler, A

    J. Schindler, A. Li, M.C. Zheng, F. M. Ellis, and T. Kottos, Experimental study of active LRC circuits with PT symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 84, 040101(R) (2011)

    2011

  24. [31]

    Benisty et al

    H. Benisty et al. , Implementation of PT symmetric de- vices using plasmonics: Principle and applications, Opt. Express 19, 18004 (2011)

    2011

  25. [32]

    Alaeian and J

    H. Alaeian and J. A. Dionne, Parity-time-symmetric plasmonic metamaterials, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033829 (2014)

    2014

  26. [33]

    P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, G.-Y. Chen, Y.- N. Chen, and F. Nori, Collectively induced exceptional points of quantum emitters coupled to nanoparticle sur- face plasmons, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013814 (2020)

    2020

  27. [34]

    X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang, PT -symmetric acoustics, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031042 (2014)

    2014

  28. [35]

    Jing, S ¸

    H. Jing, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, X.-Y. Lu, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, PT -symmetric phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 053604 (2014)

    2014

  29. [36]

    Fleury, D

    R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alu, An invisible acous- tic sensor based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Com- mun. 6, 5905 (2015)

    2015

  30. [37]

    K. Ding, G. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental re- alization, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021007 (2016)

    2016

  31. [38]

    L¨ u, S ¸

    H. L¨ u, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, L. M. Kuang, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Exceptional Points in Random-Defect Phonon Lasers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 044020 (2017)

    2017

  32. [39]

    Zhang et al

    J. Zhang et al. , A phonon laser operating at an excep- tional point, Nat. Photon. 12, 479 (2018)

    2018

  33. [40]

    Jing et al

    H. Jing et al. , Optomechanically-induced transparency in parity-timesymmetric microresonators, Sci. Rep. 5, 9663 (2015)

    2015

  34. [41]

    D. W. Sch¨ onleber, A. Eisfeld, and R. El-Ganainy, Op- tomechanical interactions in non-Hermitian photonic molecules, New J. Phys. 18, 045014 (2016)

    2016

  35. [42]

    H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Topolog- ical energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points, Nature (London) 537, 80 (2016)

    2016

  36. [43]

    Jing, S ¸

    H. Jing, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, H. L¨ u, and F. Nori, High-order exceptional points in optomechanics, Sci. Rep. 7, 3386 (2017)

    2017

  37. [44]

    Zhang et al

    Z. Zhang et al. , Observation of Parity-Time Symmetry in Optically Induced Atomic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123601 (2016)

    2016

  38. [45]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nat. Phys. 15, 1232 (2019)

    2019

  39. [46]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum Jumps in the Non-Hermitian Dynamics of a Superconducting Qubit Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140504 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, S. Erdamar, Y. N. Joglekar, K. W. Murch, Decoherence Induced Exceptional Points in a Dissipative Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 110402 (2022)

    2022

  41. [48]

    A. Roy, S. Jahani, Q. Guo, A. Dutt, S. Fan, M.-A. Miri, and A. Marandi, Nondissipative non-Hermitian dynam- ics and exceptional points in coupled optical parametric oscillators, Optica 8, 415 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Jahani, A

    S. Jahani, A. Roy, and A. Marandi, Wavelength-scale optical parametric oscillators, Optica 8, 262 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Sheikhey, A

    M. Sheikhey, A. Fard, and H. Baghban, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser with multi protected modes, Phys. Scr. 96, 125829 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    M. Kang, F. Liu, and J. Li, Effective spontaneous PT - symmetry breaking in hybridized metamaterials, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053824 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Fleury, D

    R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alo, Negative refrac- tion and planar focusing based on parity-time symmet- ric metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023903 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Y. Sun, W. Tan, H.-q. Li, J. Li, and H. Chen, Exper- imental demonstration of a coherent perfect absorber with PT phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143903 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    M. Kang, J. Chen, and Y. D. Chong, Chiral exceptional points in metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033834 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    S. Xiao, J. Gear, S. Rotter, and J. Li, Effective PT - symmetric metasurfaces for subwavelength amplified sensing, New J. Phys. 18, 085004 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Gao et al

    T. Gao et al. , Observation of non-Hermitian degenera- cies in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard, Nature (Lon- 21 don) 526, 554 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Peng et al

    P. Peng et al. , Anti-parity-time symmetry with flying atoms, Nat. Phys. 12, 1139 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    L. Ding, K. Shi, Q. Zhang, D. Shen, X. Zhang, and W. Zhang, Experimental Determination of PT -Symmetric Exceptional Points in a Single Trapped Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 083604 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Liang, Y

    C. Liang, Y. Tang, A.-N. Xu, and Y.-C. Liu, Observa- tion of exceptional points in thermal atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 263601 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    J. L. Miller, Exceptional points make for exceptional sensors, Phys. Today 70, 23 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res

    J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photonics Res. 8, 1457 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in ex- ceptional point-based sensing, Nat

    J. Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in ex- ceptional point-based sensing, Nat. Commun. 11, 2454 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Hatano, Exceptional points of the Lindblad operator of a two-level system, Mol

    N. Hatano, Exceptional points of the Lindblad operator of a two-level system, Mol. Phys. 117, 2121 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    Auzinsh, D

    M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, and S. M. Rochester, Optically Polarized Atoms: Understanding Light-Atom Interac- tions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, I. I. Arkhipov, and F. Nori, Hybrid-Liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians and Liouvillians via postselection of quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062112 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, G.-Y. Chen, F. Nori, Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians and no-go theorems in quan- tum information, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062118 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Ch.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, C.-Ts. Chan, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Flattening the Curve with Einstein’s Quantum Elevator: Hermitization of Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians via the Vielbein Formalism, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023070 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, Y.-N. Chen, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Emergent Parallel Transports and Curvatures in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Quantum 8, 1277 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, J. Barnett, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Heisenberg and Heisenberg-Like Representa- tions via Hilbert Space Bundle Geometry in the Non- Hermitian Regime, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052213 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Erdamar, M

    S. Erdamar, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, W. Chen, J. Muldoon, Y. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Constraining work fluc- tuations of non-Hermitian dynamics across the excep- tional point of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022013 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    S. Abo, P. Tulewicz, K. Bartkiewicz, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, and A. Miranowicz, Experimental Liouvillian excep- tional points in a quantum system without Hamiltonian singularities, New J. Phys. 26, 123032 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    Zhang et al., Dynamical control of quantum heat engines using exceptional points, Nat

    J.-W. Zhang et al., Dynamical control of quantum heat engines using exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 13, 6225 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Bu et al., Enhancement of Quantum Heat Engine by Encircling a Liouvillian Exceptional Point, Phys

    J.-T. Bu et al., Enhancement of Quantum Heat Engine by Encircling a Liouvillian Exceptional Point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 110402 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Bu et al

    J.-T. Bu et al. , Chiral quantum heating and cooling with an optically controlled ion, Light: Sci. App. 13, 143 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Khandelwal, N

    S. Khandelwal, N. Brunner, and G. Haack, Signatures of Liouvillian Exceptional Points in a Quantum Thermal Machine, PRX Quantum 2, 040346 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Lin, P.-C

    J.-D. Lin, P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori, Yueh-Nan Chen, Non-Markovian Quantum Ex- ceptional Points, Nat. Commun. 16, 1289 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    M. V. Berry and M. Wilkinson, Diabolical points in the spectra of triangles, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sc. 392, 15 (1984)

    1984

  72. [80]

    I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, and F. Nori, Dynamically encircling an ex- ceptional curve by crossing diabolic points: A pro- grammable multimode switch, Nat. Comm. 14, 2076 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Naikoo, R

    J. Naikoo, R. W. Chhajlany, and A. Miranowicz, En- hanced Quantum Sensing with Hybrid Exceptional- Diabolic Singularities, New J. Phys. 27, 064505 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Peˇ rina, Jr., A

    J. Peˇ rina, Jr., A. Miranowicz, G. Chimczak, and A. Kowalewska-Kudlaszyk, Quantum Liouvillian ex- ceptional and diabolical points for bosonic fields with quadratic Hamiltonians: The Heisenberg-Langevin equation approach, Quantum 6, 883 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    Perina Jr., A

    J. Perina Jr., A. Miranowicz, J. K. Kalaga, W. Leo´ nski, Unavoidability of nonclassicality loss in PT -symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. A 108, 033512 (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    Thapliyal, J

    K. Thapliyal, J. Peˇ rina Jr., G. Chimczak, A. Kowalewska-Kud laszyk, and A. Miranowicz, Multiple quantum exceptional, diabolical, and hybrid points in multimode bosonic systems: I. Inherited and genuine singularities, e-print arXiv:2405.01666 (2024)

    2024

  77. [85]

    Peˇ rina Jr., K

    J. Peˇ rina Jr., K. Thapliyal, G. Chimczak, A. Kowalewska-Kud laszyk, and A. Miranowicz, Multiple quantum exceptional, diabolical, and hybrid points in multimode bosonic systems: II. Nonconventional PT - symmetric dynamics and unidirectional coupling, e- print arXiv:2405.01667 (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Anderson, J

    M. Anderson, J. Ensher, M. Matthews, C. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein condensa- tion in a dilute atomic vapor, Science 269, 198 (1995)

    1995

  79. [87]

    Davis, M

    K. Davis, M. Mewes, M. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995)

    1995

  80. [88]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  81. [89]

    P. S. Jessen and I. H. Deutsch, Optical lattices, in Ad- vances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Vol. 37, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996), pp. 95-138

    1996

  82. [90]

    Happer and A

    W. Happer and A. Tam, Effect of rapid spin exchange on the magnetic-resonance spectrum of alkali vapors, Phys. Rev. A 16, 1877 (1977)

    1977

  83. [91]

    Mouloudakis, J

    K. Mouloudakis, J. Kong, A. Sierant, E. Arkin, M. Hern ndez Ruiz, R. Jim ´ enez-Martinez, and M. Mitchell, Anomalous noise spectra in a spin-exchange-relaxation- free alkali-metal vapor, Phys. Rev. A 109, L040802 (2024). 22

    2024

  84. [92]

    J. Kong, R. Jim´ enez-Martinez, C. Troullinou, V. Lu- civero, G. T th, and M. Mitchell, Measurement-induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly- interacting atomic system, Nat. Commun. 11, 2415 (2020)

    2020

  85. [93]

    M. V. Balabas, T. Karaulanov, M. P. Ledbetter, and D. Budker, Polarized alkali-metal vapor with minute-long transverse spin-relaxation time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 070801 (2010)

    2010

  86. [94]

    Schmidt, R

    O. Schmidt, R. Wynands, Z. Hussein, and D. Meschede, Steep dispersion and group velocity below c/3000 in coherent population trapping, Phys. Rev. A 53, R27 (1996)

    1996

  87. [95]

    Hammerer, K

    K. Hammerer, K. M¨ olmer, E. Polzik, and J. Cirac, Light-matter quantum interface, Phys. Rev. A 70, 044304 (2004)

    2004

  88. [96]

    O. Katz, R. Shaham, E. Polzik, and O. Firstenberg, Long-lived entanglement generation of nuclear spins us- ing coherent light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 043602 (2020)

    2020

  89. [97]

    Jensen, W

    K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, H. Krauter, T. Fernholz, B. Nielsen, M. Owari, M. Plenio, A. Serafini, M. Wolf, and E. Polzik, Quantum memory for entangled continuous- variable states, Nat. Phys. 7, 13 (2011)

    2011

  90. [98]

    Mikhailov and I

    E. Mikhailov and I. Novikova, Low-frequency vacuum squeezing via polarization self-rotation in Rb vapor, Opt. Lett. 33, 1213 (2008)

    2008

  91. [99]

    H. Dang, A. Maloof, and M. Romalis, Ultrahigh sensi- tivity magnetic field and magnetization measurements with an atomic magnetometer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 151110 (2010)

    2010

  92. [100]

    Chalupczak, R

    W. Chalupczak, R. Godun, S. Pustelny, and W. Gawlik, Room temperature femtotesla radio-frequency atomic magnetometer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 242401 (2012)

    2012

  93. [101]

    Budker and M

    D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007)

    2007

  94. [102]

    Kornack, R

    T. Kornack, R. Ghosh, and M. Romalis, Nuclear spin gyroscope based on an atomic comagnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230801 (2005)

    2005

  95. [103]

    Afach et al., Search for topological defect dark matter with a global network of optical magnetometers, Nat

    S. Afach et al., Search for topological defect dark matter with a global network of optical magnetometers, Nat. Phys. 17, 1396 (2021)

    2021

  96. [104]

    Padniuk, M

    M. Padniuk, M. Kopciuch, R. Cipolletti, A. Wicken- brock, D. Budker, and S. Pustelny, Response of atomic spin-based sensors to magnetic and nonmagnetic per- turbations, Sci. Rep. 12, 324 (2022)

    2022

  97. [105]

    Reiter and A

    F. Reiter and A. S. Sorensen, Effective operator formal- ism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

    2012

  98. [106]

    Baumgartner and H

    B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semigroups with GKS-Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 395303 (2008)

    2008

  99. [107]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  100. [108]

    Kumar, K

    P. Kumar, K. Snizhko, and Y. Gefen, Near-unit effi- ciency of chiral state conversion via hybrid-Liouvillian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 104, L050405 (2021)

    2021

  101. [109]

    Kopciuch and S

    M. Kopciuch and S. Pustelny, Optical reconstruction of the collective density matrix of a qutrit, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022406 (2022)

    2022

  102. [110]

    Kopciuch, M

    M. Kopciuch, M. Smolis, A. Miranowicz, and S. Pustelny, Optimized experimental optical tomography of quantum states of room-temperature alkali-metal va- por, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032402 (2024)

    2024

  103. [111]

    R. T. Thew, K. Nemoto, A. G. White, and W. J. Munro, Qudit quantum state tomography, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303 (2002)

    2002

  104. [112]

    G. O. Samach et al. , Lindblad tomography of a super- conducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 064056 (2022)

    2022

  105. [113]

    Y. Sun, M. Kopciuch, A. D. Fard, and S. Pustelny, Quantum process tomography of atomic vapors, e-print arXiv:2508.19634 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Messiah, Quantum Mechanics , vol

    A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics , vol. 2 (Elsevier, 1961)

    1961

  107. [115]

    Schlienz and G

    J. Schlienz and G. Mahler, Description of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4396 (1995)

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.