Adjusting Tissue Puncture Omnidirectionally In Situ with Pneumatic Rotatable Biopsy Mechanism and Hierarchical Airflow Management in Tortuous Luminal Pathways

Botao Lin; Hongliang Ren; Jiaole Wang; Sishen Yuan; Tiantian Wang; Tinghua Zhang; Wu Yuan

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 17 references

Adjusting Tissue Puncture Omnidirectionally In Situ with Pneumatic Rotatable Biopsy Mechanism and Hierarchical Airflow Management in Tortuous Luminal Pathways

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A pneumatically-driven catheter can rotate its biopsy needle in six evenly spaced directions and deploy it with the same air supply, without twisting the catheter.

desk verdict A genuinely new pneumatically indexed biopsy mechanism with a working prototype, but the repeatability claim that carries the 'omnidirectional' selling point is supported by only four benchtop rounds and one phantom run. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03017 v1 pith:YVKS5TLB submitted 2025-06-03 cs.RO

Botao Lin , Tinghua Zhang , Sishen Yuan , Tiantian Wang , Jiaole Wang , Wu Yuan , Hongliang Ren This is my paper

classification cs.RO

keywords pneumaticactuationbiopsycatheterrotatablemechanismomnidirectionalsamplinghierarchicalairflowcontroltortuouslumeninsitucontinuumrobot

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a single pneumatic airflow, split into low- and high-pressure stages by magnetic thresholds, can both aim and fire a biopsy needle inside a catheter that has already curved through tortuous lumens. The central device is the pneumatic rotatable biopsy mechanism (PRBM), whose fan blades convert air pressure into rotation and upward thrust. With the prototype, 0.2 MPa indexes the needle direction by 60 degrees per pulse, giving six evenly spaced sampling directions around 360 degrees, and 0.3 MPa deploys the needle. The authors support this with force modeling, airflow simulation, and a stomach-duodenum phantom test in which the needle was realigned to a target and punctured it. If correct, this eliminates the need to twist the catheter from the proximal end, reducing friction, hysteresis, and tissue trauma.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the pneumatic rotatable biopsy mechanism (PRBM), a distal assembly consisting of a rotatable slider with fixed fan blades, a toothed outer shell and shell cover, and two magnetic couplings of deliberately different strengths. The fans translate air pressure into rotation and lift; the two magnetic thresholds turn one pressure signal into two sequential actions: rotating the slider to one of six tooth-indexed positions at low pressure, then releasing the needle at high pressure. This hierarchical airflow management is what allows direction selection and needle deployment to share a single air channel while keeping the distal mechanism compact.

What would settle it

Run the catheter in a curved, lubricated phantom with the needle tip pressed against a soft tissue simulant, apply twenty pressure cycles, and record the needle's angular orientation after each cycle; if the angular step drifts from 60 degrees by more than half the tooth spacing or the mechanism stalls, the claimed omnidirectional sampling is not reliable in situ.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports the design, modelling, and benchtop and phantom validation of a pneumatically-driven endoluminal biopsy catheter whose distal end combines a bending module and a PRBM. The PRBM uses a rotatable slider with internal fan structures; airflow through the fans generates both an axial lifting force and a rotational torque. Two magnetic couplings with different strengths create a pressure hierarchy: low pressure (0.2 MPa) overcomes only the weaker coupling, lifting the slider to a toothed ring and indexing it by a 60-degree tooth offset, while halting the air lets magnets pull it down, producing a net rotation of 60 degrees per pulse. High pressure (0.3 MPa) also overcomes the stronger coupling, releasing the internal slider and deploying the biopsy needle. Four benchtop rounds of repeated deployment gave an average needle-tip position deviation of 2.63 mm; puncture force was measured at about 10 mN. A phantom test in a stomach-duodenum model showed that after insertion the needle direction could be adjusted to align with a target and successfully puncture it within about 10 seconds.

Load-bearing premise

The rotation mechanism must index a consistent 60-degree step each time a pressure pulse is applied, but that repeatability was demonstrated only in four benchtop rounds and one phantom alignment, with the catheter straight and not under the load of tissue contact in a curved lumen.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Omnidirectional biopsy becomes possible deep inside tortuous lumens without proximal catheter rotation, so the tool does not transmit twisting torque or drag against the lumen wall.
Because both direction selection and needle firing are driven from one air channel, the actuation can be simplified to a single pressure source and a valve, reducing catheter complexity.
The measured 10 mN puncture force is sufficient for soft tissue sampling, and the average 2.63 mm tip deviation over repeated deployments indicates the indexing is reasonably repeatable on the benchtop.
At each distal position the six 60-degree-spaced directions give full 360-degree coverage, and combined with the bending module's constant-curvature bending, this expands the reachable biopsy workspace relative to single-direction tools.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The 60-degree indexing repeatability was validated in only four benchtop rounds and one phantom test; in a living lumen with peristalsis, gravity, and tissue contact, the magnetic reset could fail or skip, so a closed-loop angular sensor would be a natural next step.
The 10 mN puncture force, while adequate for soft tissue, is far below forces needed for fibrotic or calcified lesions; clinical utility would depend on matching needle gauge and pressure to tissue stiffness.
Because the airflow does double duty, the pressure rise rate itself becomes a control input: a fast ramp could be tuned to rotate without firing, while a slow ramp might fire immediately, enabling a broader set of sequencing behaviors than the two fixed pressures used here.
The two-threshold magnetic hierarchy is a general principle: any endoluminal tool needing two sequential actions (grasp-then-cut, deploy-then-anchor) from a single energy source could reuse this architecture.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a real mechanism, not a paper wrapped around a simulation. The fan-driven rotatable slider with magnetic detent indexing, and a single air line whose pressure level selects rotation versus needle deployment, is new as far as the cited literature goes. The bending module is from the group's prior Pneumaoct work, and they say so. The prototype exists, deploys in six directions at roughly 60° intervals, and the phantom test shows an actual in-situ direction change without twisting the catheter. That is a solid proof-of-concept for a subfield that mostly avoids distal rotation because torque transfer in tortuous lumens is poor.

The soft spots are real and they are all in the validation, not in the design. The load-bearing claim is that one low-pressure pulse advances the rotatable slider by exactly one tooth pitch, every time, under realistic conditions. The paper gives four consecutive redeployment rounds and an average planar tip deviation of 2.63 mm, but no per-cycle angular increments, no cumulative drift over many cycles, and no test in a curved, gravity-loaded, tissue-contacting configuration. The rotate pressure (0.2 MPa) and deploy pressure (0.3 MPa) are only 0.1 MPa apart, and pressure losses along a tortuous air tube could plausibly blur that margin. One force trace at ~10 mN is fine as a demonstration but not a characterization. "Omnidirectional" is also stronger than the six discrete directions shown; the paper itself uses "six sampling directions" in the abstract, so the mismatch is mostly in the framing.

None of this is fatal. The indexing drift, pressure margin, and curved-channel behavior are all things that can be measured, and the authors already acknowledge in their conclusion that the design needs refinement. The force model is simple P-times-area plus standard magnetic integration, but they do not misuse it as a prediction; the operating pressures are honestly described as chosen after testing. The citation pattern is appropriate: self-citation points to the prior bending module, which is the relevant source.

Who gets value: continuum robotics and interventional device researchers, especially people working on biopsy or distal dexterity in lumens. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should insist on repeatability data over several dozen cycles, per-direction error, curved/tilted configurations, and a demonstration that the rotation-to-deployment pressure margin survives realistic tortuous paths. Without that, the paper is a nice workshop prototype; with it, it is a solid journal contribution.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a pneumatically driven robotic catheter combining a bending module and a Pneumatic Rotatable Biopsy Mechanism (PRBM) at its distal end. The PRBM uses a single air supply with hierarchical pressure control: low-pressure airflow rotates a slotted slider through fan-generated forces to index six 60-degree needle directions, and higher-pressure airflow overcomes magnetic thresholds to deploy a tilted biopsy needle. The paper presents the design, constant-curvature kinematics, a simplified aerodynamic force model, magnetic force integration, and a 3D-printed prototype evaluated by four needle-deployment rounds, one puncture-force measurement, and one stomach-duodenum phantom test.

Significance. If the indexing repeatability holds under realistic luminal conditions, the mechanism is a useful contribution: it removes the need to twist the catheter proximally and enables circumferential sampling in situ. The paper's strengths are the compact, low-cost prototype; the explicit six-direction design; direct benchtop deployment data; direct force measurement; and a phantom demonstration in a curved anatomy. However, the reported validation is preliminary, and the reliability claims in the title and abstract currently outrun the experimental evidence.

major comments (3)

[Section IV.B, Figs. 7–9] The claim that the PRBM reliably indexes six 60-degree sampling directions is not supported by the reported data. Figure 7(b) shows only four consecutive deployment rounds, and the 2.63 mm average planar tip deviation is an aggregate measure; the paper does not report per-cycle angular increments, the angular spread for each of the six directions, cumulative drift over many cycles, or results in curved, gravity-loaded, tissue-contacting configurations. Because the selected rotate and deploy pressures (0.2 MPa and 0.3 MPa) are separated by only 0.1 MPa, pressure drops or backpressure variations in a tortuous lumen could plausibly cause skipped steps, partial rotation, or premature deployment. Please add per-cycle angular repeatability measurements across many cycles in straight and bent configurations, with error bars.
[Section IV.B, Fig. 8] The puncture force claim rests on a single force trace and no comparison with required tissue puncture forces. The manuscript states that approximately 10 mN is sufficient for the biopsy needle to sample soft human tissue without supporting data or citation. Please report repeated measurements and compare against threshold forces for relevant tissues, or soften the claim.
[Section IV.B, Fig. 9] The phantom test is a single case with one direction change and one puncture; it does not demonstrate all six directions or repeated omnidirectional sampling in situ. The abstract's 'rapid omnidirectional sampling' claim therefore goes beyond the evidence. Please provide a multi-target phantom study covering all six directions, or qualify the claim to a single-case demonstration.

minor comments (5)

[Section III.B, Eq. (3)] The notation 'F=P a' is ambiguous and the decomposition into F_p and F_v is not clearly defined; write F = P times A and define the fan area and the force components. The model is also not validated against measured aerodynamic force, so it should be presented as qualitative or supplemented with a comparison.
[Section III.B, Eq. (4)] The magnetic force integral uses an unusual r^5 denominator and does not define the unit vector consistently; please check the formula against a standard magnetostatic force expression.
[Section III.A, Eq. (1)] The expression 'θr=L1' is confusing; it should be written as r times theta equals L1 or theta equals L1 over r. Equation (2) uses Porigin without defining it in the coordinate frame.
[Section IV.A] The statement that adjustment and deployment can ideally be completed in approximately one second is not supported by any timing measurement; either report actual timing data or remove this claim.
[Abstract and Section I] The term 'omnidirectional' should be qualified, since the prototype provides six coplanar directions rather than arbitrary three-dimensional orientation; also, 'torturous' in the abstract should be 'tortuous'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the operating pressures are empirically tuned, the force and kinematics models are standard physics, and the self-cited bending-module work is independent prior support.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical mechanism demonstration rather than a derived prediction. The 0.2 MPa and 0.3 MPa operating pressures are explicitly tuned after testing ('After testing and optimizing, the corresponding air pressures used to adjust the biopsy direction and deploy the biopsy needle were chosen to be 0.2 MPa and 0.3 MPa'), so no fitted parameter is recycled as a prediction. The force model is the basic F=Pa relation plus a standard magnetostatic volume integral; the paper does not use measured forces to compute the model and then present the model as a prediction. The kinematics model uses a stated constant-curvature assumption and rotation/translation matrices, which is geometry, not an input that produces the six-direction omnidirectional claim. The six 60-degree directions are a design property of the toothed ratchet arrangement, and the phantom test is an independent benchtop demonstration. The only self-citations are to prior work [13] for the bending module's pressure-curvature behavior and asymmetric deformation; that prior result is externally published and is not used to prove the PRBM's rotation or deployment, so it is not load-bearing for the central claim. No equation is defined in terms of another result, no prediction reduces to a fit by construction, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanism depends on empirically selected air pressures (0.2 and 0.3 MPa), the constant-curvature bending model from prior work, and an ideal force-transfer assumption. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)

P_rotation = 0.2 MPa
Actuation pressure for rotating the biopsy direction; selected after testing and optimizing, Section IV.A, not derived.
P_deploy = 0.3 MPa
Actuation pressure for deploying the needle; selected after testing and optimizing, Section IV.A, not derived.
Needle tilt angle = 56 degrees
Design parameter of the biopsy module (Section IV.B, Fig. 8) that determines the needle exit angle and reach.
Needle extension length = 6.8 mm
Extended length of the needle during puncture, Section IV.B, Fig. 8; affects reach and force.
Number of biopsy directions = 6
The mechanism is designed with six sampling directions at 60-degree intervals; used in the workspace simulation and the 'omnidirectional' claim.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Constant curvature bending model from prior work [13]
Invoked in Section III.A to derive catheter posture; the bending actuator is assumed to bend with constant curvature, as characterized in the authors' previous Pneumaoct work.
domain assumption Ideal pneumatic force transfer (F = P*A)
Section III.B assumes air pressure acting on the fan area directly produces the propulsive and rotational force, neglecting friction, leakage, and dynamic losses.
domain assumption Biopsy needle force of 10 mN suffices for soft tissue
Section IV.B states the measured puncture force is sufficient for soft human tissue, but no direct tissue puncture test on biological samples is reported; the phantom test is the only puncture validation.
standard math Magnetic force integration formula (Eq. 4) with known magnetization
The force between magnets is computed using a standard magnetostatics volume integral; assumes known magnetization and geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adjusting Tissue Puncture Omnidirectionally In Situ with Pneumatic Rotatable Biopsy Mechanism and Hierarchical Airflow Management in Tortuous Luminal Pathways." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YVKS5TLB

@misc{pith2026250603017,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adjusting Tissue Puncture Omnidirectionally In Situ with Pneumatic Rotatable Biopsy Mechanism and Hierarchical Airflow Management in Tortuous Luminal Pathways},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YVKS5TLB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03017}
}

read the original abstract

In situ tissue biopsy with an endoluminal catheter is an efficient approach for disease diagnosis, featuring low invasiveness and few complications. However, the endoluminal catheter struggles to adjust the biopsy direction by distal endoscope bending or proximal twisting for tissue sampling within the tortuous luminal organs, due to friction-induced hysteresis and narrow spaces. Here, we propose a pneumatically-driven robotic catheter enabling the adjustment of the sampling direction without twisting the catheter for an accurate in situ omnidirectional biopsy. The distal end of the robotic catheter consists of a pneumatic bending actuator for the catheter's deployment in torturous luminal organs and a pneumatic rotatable biopsy mechanism (PRBM). By hierarchical airflow control, the PRBM can adjust the biopsy direction under low airflow and deploy the biopsy needle with higher airflow, allowing for rapid omnidirectional sampling of tissue in situ. This paper describes the design, modeling, and characterization of the proposed robotic catheter, including repeated deployment assessments of the biopsy needle, puncture force measurement, and validation via phantom tests. The PRBM prototype has six sampling directions evenly distributed across 360 degrees when actuated by a positive pressure of 0.3 MPa. The pneumatically-driven robotic catheter provides a novel biopsy strategy, potentially facilitating in situ multidirectional biopsies in tortuous luminal organs with minimum invasiveness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03017 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Design of the proposed robotic catheter. An overview of the PRBM and its components is shown. The PRBM is composed of a rotation module [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Process of biopsy direction altering and needle deploying. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Geometric parameters of the proposed robotic catheter and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Collecting the puncture force of the biopsy needle. (a) Setup of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Repeated deployment assessment of the biopsy needle. (a) In the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Design of a possible modular PRBM that can carry out a radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

Percutaneous core biopsy de- vices: A detailed review and comparison of different needle designs,

B. S. Strnad, M. Kristeva, M. Itani, D. T. Fetzer, S. D. O’Connor, M. D. Patel, and W. D. Middleton, “Percutaneous core biopsy de- vices: A detailed review and comparison of different needle designs,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2024

work page 2024
[2]

A modular lockable mechanism for tendon-driven robots: Design, modeling and characterization,

B. Lin, J. Wang, S. Song, B. Li, and M. Q.-H. Meng, “A modular lockable mechanism for tendon-driven robots: Design, modeling and characterization,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2023–2030, 2022

work page 2023
[3]

A survey of needle steering approaches in minimally invasive surgery,

Y . Duan, J. Ling, Z. Feng, T. Ye, T. Sun, and Y . Zhu, “A survey of needle steering approaches in minimally invasive surgery,”Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1492–1517, 2024

work page 2024
[4]

Trans- bronchial biopsy catheter enhanced by a multisection continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion,

L. Dupourqu ´e, F. Masaki, Y . L. Colson, T. Kato, and N. Hata, “Trans- bronchial biopsy catheter enhanced by a multisection continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion,”International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2021–2029, 2019

work page 2021
[5]

Development of a compact continuum tubular robotic system for nasopharyngeal biopsy,

L. Wu, S. Song, K. Wu, C. M. Lim, and H. Ren, “Development of a compact continuum tubular robotic system for nasopharyngeal biopsy,” Medical & biological engineering & computing, vol. 55, pp. 403–417, 2017

work page 2017
[6]

Patient-specific magnetic catheters for atraumatic autonomous endoscopy,

G. Pittiglio, P. Lloyd, T. da Veiga, O. Onaizah, C. Pompili, J. H. Chandler, and P. Valdastri, “Patient-specific magnetic catheters for atraumatic autonomous endoscopy,”Soft robotics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1120–1133, 2022

work page 2022
[7]

Continuum robots: An overview,

M. Russo, S. M. H. Sadati, X. Dong, A. Mohammad, I. D. Walker, C. Bergeles, K. Xu, and D. A. Axinte, “Continuum robots: An overview,”Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 2200367, 2023

work page 2023
[8]

Three- dimensional collision avoidance method for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery,

L. Li, X. Li, B. Ouyang, H. Mo, H. Ren, and S. Yang, “Three- dimensional collision avoidance method for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery,”Cyborg and Bionic Systems, vol. 4, p. 0042, 2023

work page 2023

Show all 17 references

[9]

Concurrently bendable and rotatable continuum tubular robot for omnidirectional multi-core transurethral prostate biopsy,

X. Xiao, Y . Wu, Q. Wu, and H. Ren, “Concurrently bendable and rotatable continuum tubular robot for omnidirectional multi-core transurethral prostate biopsy,”Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 60, pp. 229–238, 2022

2022
[10]

A tubular dual-roller bending mechanism toward robotic transurethral prostate biopsy,

X. Xiao, C. Li, X. Gu, Y . Yan, Y . Wu, Q. Wu, E. Chiong, and H. Ren, “A tubular dual-roller bending mechanism toward robotic transurethral prostate biopsy,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2483–2494, 2020

2020
[11]

A novel contact-aided continuum robotic system: design, modeling, and validation,

Z. Yang, L. Yang, Y . Sun, and X. Chen, “A novel contact-aided continuum robotic system: design, modeling, and validation,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2024

2024
[12]

Motor-free telerobotic endomicroscopy for steerable and programmable imaging in complex curved and localized areas,

S. Yuan, C. Xu, B. Cui, T. Zhang, B. Liang, W. Yuan, and H. Ren, “Motor-free telerobotic endomicroscopy for steerable and programmable imaging in complex curved and localized areas,”Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 7680, 2024

2024
[13]

Pneumaoct: Pneumatic optical coherence tomography endoscopy for targeted distortion-free imaging in tortuous and narrow internal lumens,

T. Zhang, S. Yuan, C. Xu, P. Liu, H.-C. Chang, S. H. C. Ng, H. Ren, and W. Yuan, “Pneumaoct: Pneumatic optical coherence tomography endoscopy for targeted distortion-free imaging in tortuous and narrow internal lumens,”Science Advances, vol. 10, no. 35, p. eadp3145, 2024

2024
[14]

A novel robotic bronchoscope system for navigation and biopsy of pulmonary lesions,

X. Duan, D. Xie, R. Zhang, X. Li, J. Sun, C. Qian, X. Song, and C. Li, “A novel robotic bronchoscope system for navigation and biopsy of pulmonary lesions,”Cyborg and Bionic Systems, vol. 4, p. 0013, 2023

2023
[15]

Review of research on path planning and control methods of flexible steerable needle puncture robot,

K. Wu, B. Li, Y . Zhang, and X. Dai, “Review of research on path planning and control methods of flexible steerable needle puncture robot,”Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 91–112, 2022

2022
[16]

Flexible needle steering with tethered and untethered actuation: Current states, targeting errors, challenges and opportunities,

M. Lu, Y . Zhang, C. M. Lim, and H. Ren, “Flexible needle steering with tethered and untethered actuation: Current states, targeting errors, challenges and opportunities,”Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 905–924, 2023

2023
[17]

Continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion for endoscopic third ventriculostomy and tumor biopsy,

Y . Gao, K. Takagi, T. Kato, N. Shono, and N. Hata, “Continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion for endoscopic third ventriculostomy and tumor biopsy,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 379–390, 2019

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Percutaneous core biopsy de- vices: A detailed review and comparison of different needle designs,

B. S. Strnad, M. Kristeva, M. Itani, D. T. Fetzer, S. D. O’Connor, M. D. Patel, and W. D. Middleton, “Percutaneous core biopsy de- vices: A detailed review and comparison of different needle designs,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2024

work page 2024

[2] [2]

A modular lockable mechanism for tendon-driven robots: Design, modeling and characterization,

B. Lin, J. Wang, S. Song, B. Li, and M. Q.-H. Meng, “A modular lockable mechanism for tendon-driven robots: Design, modeling and characterization,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2023–2030, 2022

work page 2023

[3] [3]

A survey of needle steering approaches in minimally invasive surgery,

Y . Duan, J. Ling, Z. Feng, T. Ye, T. Sun, and Y . Zhu, “A survey of needle steering approaches in minimally invasive surgery,”Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1492–1517, 2024

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Trans- bronchial biopsy catheter enhanced by a multisection continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion,

L. Dupourqu ´e, F. Masaki, Y . L. Colson, T. Kato, and N. Hata, “Trans- bronchial biopsy catheter enhanced by a multisection continuum robot with follow-the-leader motion,”International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2021–2029, 2019

work page 2021

[5] [5]

Development of a compact continuum tubular robotic system for nasopharyngeal biopsy,

L. Wu, S. Song, K. Wu, C. M. Lim, and H. Ren, “Development of a compact continuum tubular robotic system for nasopharyngeal biopsy,” Medical & biological engineering & computing, vol. 55, pp. 403–417, 2017

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Patient-specific magnetic catheters for atraumatic autonomous endoscopy,

G. Pittiglio, P. Lloyd, T. da Veiga, O. Onaizah, C. Pompili, J. H. Chandler, and P. Valdastri, “Patient-specific magnetic catheters for atraumatic autonomous endoscopy,”Soft robotics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1120–1133, 2022

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Continuum robots: An overview,

M. Russo, S. M. H. Sadati, X. Dong, A. Mohammad, I. D. Walker, C. Bergeles, K. Xu, and D. A. Axinte, “Continuum robots: An overview,”Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 2200367, 2023

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Three- dimensional collision avoidance method for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery,

L. Li, X. Li, B. Ouyang, H. Mo, H. Ren, and S. Yang, “Three- dimensional collision avoidance method for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery,”Cyborg and Bionic Systems, vol. 4, p. 0042, 2023

work page 2023