Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Novel Experimental Platform to realize One-dimensional Quantum Fluids

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that preplating MCM-41 with cesium reduces the effective confinement radius for helium to the subnanometer scale, making Cs-preplated MCM-41 an ideal platform for studying one-dimensional superfluid helium.

desk verdict A promising but unverified proposal: Cs-preplated MCM-41 could confine helium to a 1D core, yet the paper's key evidence is an undisclosed simulation and a misread BET analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03200 v1 pith:RAA6N4XN submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.quant-gas

Stephanie McNamara , Prabin Parajuli , Sutirtha Paul , Garfield Warren , Adrian Del Maestro , Paul E. Sokol This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.quant-gas
keywords MCM-41cesiumpreplatingone-dimensionalconfinementsuperfluidhelium-4Tomonaga-Luttingerliquidnon-wettingadsorptionquantumfluidsporousmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a way to confine superfluid helium-4 to one dimension by preplating the pores of the mesoporous material MCM-41 with a single layer of cesium. Because helium does not wet cesium and because the outer part of the pore is blocked by the Cs layer, the authors argue that helium is pushed into a narrow central core with radius near 5 Å, below helium's coherence length. If true, this would give an experimentally accessible platform for studying one-dimensional quantum fluids, including Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid behavior, without needing to synthesize smaller pores directly. The paper supports the idea with preliminary nitrogen and helium adsorption isotherms and small-angle X-ray scattering, plus atomistic simulations of the confinement potential.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective confinement potential for helium-4 inside a Cs-preplated cylindrical pore of MCM-41. The paper calculates this potential from atomistic theory and locates its minimum at 5 Å from the pore center with a depth of about -30 K, compared with -170 K at 12.5 Å for bare MCM-41 and -70 K at 8 Å for argon-preplated pores. That shallow, narrow potential, combined with helium's non-wetting behavior on cesium, drives the helium density to the pore center, giving the quasi-one-dimensional geometry. The BET analysis yielding a negative c constant is the experimental proxy for non-wetting.

What would settle it

Measure the radial density distribution of helium in Cs-preplated MCM-41 by neutron scattering and check whether the helium density is confined within roughly 2.5 to 5 Å of the pore center; a density spread across the full 15 Å geometric radius, or a positive BET c constant indicating wetting, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that coating the pore walls of MCM-41 with cesium creates an effective cylindrical core of subnanometer radius for helium-4, because the Cs layer decreases the pore volume and, more importantly, the known non-wetting interaction keeps helium away from the walls. Atomistic calculations reported in the paper put the helium confinement potential minimum at about 5 Å from the pore center with depth roughly -30 K, and the two-body radial wavefunction for helium in Cs-plated pores peaks at the center and decays to zero beyond about 2.5 Å. The authors take this as evidence that helium atoms occupy the central region, so the fluid is confined on a scale smaller than the roughly 10 Å coherence length, which is the condition for observing one-dimensional Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid behavior. Their preliminary characterization shows the hexagonal pore structure survives Cs plating, pore size decreases, and the BET analysis of helium adsorption gives a negative c constant, which they read as helium not wetting the Cs surface.

Load-bearing premise

The case for subnanometer confinement depends on simulated potential minima and wavefunctions whose calculation details are not shown, while the measured pore radius after cesium plating is about 15 Å, larger than helium's roughly 10 Å coherence length.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the subnanometer confinement holds, helium-4 in Cs-preplated MCM-41 should show Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid signatures at appropriate fillings and temperatures.
  • The same preplating approach should work for other non-wetting alkali metals such as Rb and K, whose simulated wavefunctions also peak in the pore center.
  • The preservation of the hexagonal pore structure means existing neutron-scattering probes can be applied to Cs-plated samples to search for one-dimensional static and dynamic structure factors.
  • The negative BET c constant provides an isotherm-based diagnostic for identifying non-wetting adsorbate-surface pairs in porous media, useful for screening other preplating materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the effective confinement radius should depend on helium filling; at low fillings a single central chain is expected, with a crossover to multichain behavior at higher fillings.
  • Because the measured nitrogen pore radius after Cs plating is 15 Å, larger than helium's coherence length, the case for subnanometer confinement rests entirely on the simulated potential; a direct measurement of the helium density profile would settle which radius governs the physics.
  • The simulation details behind Fig. 1 are not given; repeating the calculation with published helium-cesium interaction potentials would test whether the 5 Å potential minimum is robust to the choice of potential parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes cesium-preplated MCM-41 as an improved platform for realizing one-dimensional quantum fluids of 4He. The argument is that Cs both reduces the effective pore size and, because 4He does not wet Cs, confines helium to an axial core. The supporting evidence is preliminary: SAXS shows the hexagonal MCM-41 structure is preserved after Cs plating; N2 adsorption at 77 K gives a decrease in mean pore diameter from 37 Å to 30 Å; and a helium adsorption isotherm at 5 K analyzed with the BET equation yields a negative BET constant, which the authors interpret as non-wetting. Atomistic simulations in Fig. 1 are invoked to claim that the confinement potential minimum moves to about 5.0 Å from the pore center and that the helium radial wavefunction decays to zero beyond 2.5 Å for Cs, Rb, and K. The paper concludes that Cs-preplated MCM-41 may serve as an ideal platform for studying 1D superfluid helium.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, this would be a useful step beyond the argon-preplating work of Refs. [27,28]: Cs preplating is synthetically accessible, the non-wetting He–Cs interaction is independently established in the literature, and the proposal does not derive its main conclusion from a fitted parameter. The SAXS and N2-isotherm measurements are straightforward and reproducible in principle, and the claim that Cs reduces the pore size is consistent with the data. However, the load-bearing premise that the effective confinement is subnanometer rests entirely on simulation results for which no method, potentials, or parameters are given, and the direct experimental pore radius of about 15 Å after Cs plating is not reconciled with the helium coherence length quoted in the paper. As written, the manuscript is a promising preliminary characterization study rather than a demonstration of the 1D platform.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Fig. 1] The numerical simulations that motivate the subnanometer-confinement claim are not described. The manuscript gives no Hamiltonian, interaction potentials, Cs coverage, pore geometry, temperature, or uncertainty estimate for Fig. 1a or Fig. 1b. Moreover, Fig. 1b models a 6 Å-radius cylinder made entirely of alkali metal, which is not the Cs-coated MCM-41 sample studied experimentally. Because the Introduction's assertion that Cs preplating 'effectively reduc[es] the pore radius to the subnanometer scale' rests on this figure, the central premise is unverifiable from the manuscript as written. Please add full simulation details or clearly reclassify the subnanometer claim as a theoretical prediction requiring separate validation.
  2. [§3.2] The measured pore radius after Cs plating is about 15 Å (mean pore diameter 30 Å from the Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari analysis), which is larger than the helium coherence length of roughly 1 nm quoted in §1. Therefore the geometric pore alone does not provide subnanometer confinement. The effective confinement must arise from the He–Cs interaction pushing helium away from the walls, but no experimental evidence in this paper demonstrates axial localization inside the actual Cs-preplated sample. The paper should either provide a direct measurement or simulation of the helium density distribution in the real sample, or explicitly limit the conclusion to 'reduced pore size plus non-wetting surface' rather than claiming subnanometer confinement.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (1) and Fig. 3] The negative BET constant c = -156 K is not valid evidence of non-wetting. In BET theory c = exp(ΔE/RT) is necessarily positive because it is an exponential of an energy difference; a negative value is unphysical and indicates only that the BET model breaks down for this adsorbate, a point the authors partly acknowledge. The conclusion that '4He atoms are not wetting the Cs surface' therefore does not follow from this fit. Non-wetting is supported by external literature (e.g., Ref. [30]), but the BET analysis should be presented as a consistency check or dropped as evidence, not used as a direct demonstration.
  4. [§4] The Conclusion states that BET analysis 'indicated that Cs repels helium atoms toward the center of the pore.' This overstates what the data show: the helium isotherm is an adsorption measurement, not a spatial probe, and the negative BET constant does not establish a radial density profile. Please rephrase to match the level of evidence actually presented.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and §1] There is a typographical error: 'Tomanga-Luttinger' should be 'Tomonaga-Luttinger'.
  2. [§2] The sentence describing Fig. 1a says 'mimum' instead of 'minimum'.
  3. [§3.1] 'Additionaly' should be 'Additionally'.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (1)] The BET constant c is defined as dimensionless, but the text reports c = -156 K. Please clarify the units and the definition of ΔE used here.
  5. [§3.2, Fig. 3] The figure caption and the text should state the fit range in p/p0 and the number of data points used for the BET fit, since the interpretation hinges on whether the linear region is well defined.
  6. [References] Reference [33] lists the Journal of Chemical Physics volume and page but the DOI resolves to a Langmuir article; please verify and correct the citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Cs-preplating proposal rests on independent external wetting physics and independent structural measurements; the unverified simulation is a reproducibility gap, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The central claim that Cs preplating creates an effective subnanometer confinement for helium rests on independent evidence rather than on fitting a parameter that is then renamed as a prediction. The non-wetting of helium on Cs is attributed to Cheng and Cole [30], an external, long-established result, and is used only as physical motivation. The reduction in geometric pore size after Cs plating is measured directly by nitrogen adsorption (mean pore diameter 37 Å before and 30 Å after plating by the Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari analysis) and by SAXS; these are not derived from the simulations. The subnanometer-confinement assertion is supported by the atomistic calculations in Fig. 1, but those simulations are inputs to the proposal, not outputs of the experimental analysis, and no fitted parameter from the isotherms is reused to predict the same isotherms or wavefunctions. The negative BET constant for helium is a separate experimental observation; while its interpretation is debatable, it is not constructed from the conclusion it is used to support. The self-citations [27,28] describe prior argon-preplating work and serve as background context; the present paper's conclusion about cesium does not reduce to those references. The main weakness—absence of any disclosure of the simulation method, potentials, coverage, and geometry, plus the mismatch between the modeled 6 Å pure-alkali cylinder and the actual 15 Å-radius Cs-coated pore—is a verifiability and correctness concern, not a circular derivation. No circular step can be quoted, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the non-wetting property of helium on cesium (from external literature), on the accuracy of undisclosed atomistic simulations, and on the interpretation of SAXS and adsorption data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • BET constant c = -156 K (reported)
    Extracted from a linear fit of the helium BET plot (Fig. 3). The paper reports it as -156 K, but c is dimensionless and must be positive in BET theory, so this value is unphysical and likely a fitting artifact.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Helium does not wet a cesium-coated surface
    Adopted from prior literature (Ref 30, Cheng et al.). This is the physical basis for expecting helium to be pushed to the pore center.
  • ad hoc to paper The atomistic simulations in Fig. 1 accurately describe He-Cs and He-silica interactions in the pore
    The simulation method and parameters are not disclosed, yet the subnanometer confinement claim relies on the simulated potential minimum at 5 Å and wavefunction localization.
  • domain assumption The change in SAXS peak intensity ratio is due to Cs inside the pores
    No direct elemental analysis (e.g., EDS, XPS) is presented to confirm the presence or location of Cs in the pores.
  • domain assumption The Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari method gives reliable pore size distributions for these materials
    A standard method for mesoporous silica, but its application here is not cross-checked with another technique.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel Experimental Platform to realize One-dimensional Quantum Fluids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RAA6N4XN

@misc{pith2026250603200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel Experimental Platform to realize One-dimensional Quantum Fluids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RAA6N4XN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03200}
}
read the original abstract

Templated porous materials, such as MCM-41, due to the uniformity of their onedimensional structure and scalability in synthesis, have emerged as an attractive medium for studying one-dimensional quantum fluids. However, the experimental challenge of synthesizing these materials with pore radii smaller than 15 Angstroms hinders the realization of a one-dimensional quantum liquid of helium within such systems, as the coherence length of helium is shorter than the pore radius. Recently, DelMaestro et. al. have preplated MCM-41 with Ar resulting in a reduction of the pore size and a softening of the adsorption potential allowing them to observe 1D Tomanga-Luttinger liquid like behavior. In this paper we present a novel method to obtain an even more ideal environment for studying the behavior of 1D 4He. We propose preplating MCM-41 pores with cesium (Cs) metal. The non-wetting nature of helium on a Cs-coated surface, coupled with the large atomic radius of cesium, creates an optimal environment for confining a quantum liquid of helium in one-dimensional geometry. We present preliminary measurements of adsorption isotherms and Small Angle X-ray Scattering studies that 1reveal a reduction in pore radius upon preplating MCM-41 with Cs, demonstrating promising prospects for facilitating the realization of one-dimensional quantum fluids in templated porous materials.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Algorithm Software for Condensed Matter Physics

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of quantum algorithm software that advertises a benchmark suite, yet the body contains no benchmarks, data, or code.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [30]

    Cheng, E., Cole, M.W., Dupont-Roc, J., Saam, W.F., Treiner, J.: Novel wetting behavior in quantum films. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(2), 557 (1993) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/revmodphys.65.557

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.557 1993

  2. [1]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 84(3), 1253– 1306 (2012)

    Imambekov, A., Schmidt, T.L., Glazman, L.I.: One-dimensional quantum liquids: Beyond the luttinger liquid paradigm. Reviews of Modern Physics 84(3), 1253– 1306 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    Nature 397(6720), 598–601 (1999)

    Bockrath, M., Cobden, D.H., Lu, J., Rinzler, A.G., Smalley, R.E., Balents, L., McEuen, P.L.: Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature 397(6720), 598–601 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [3]

    Nature 402(6759), 273–276 (1999)

    Yao, Z., Postma, H.W.C., Balents, L., Dekker, C.: Carbon nanotube intramolec- ular junctions. Nature 402(6759), 273–276 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [4]

    Nature 426(6966), 540–544 (2003)

    Ishii, H., Kataura, H., Shiozawa, H., Yoshioka, H., Otsubo, H., Takayama, Y., Miyahara, T., Suzuki, S., Achiba, Y., Nakatake, M., et al.: Direct observation of tomonaga–luttinger-liquid state in carbon nanotubes at low temperatures. Nature 426(6966), 540–544 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [5]

    Science 308(5718), 88–92 (2005) 7

    Auslaender, O., Steinberg, H., Yacoby, A., Tserkovnyak, Y., Halperin, B., Bald- win, K., Pfeiffer, L., West, K.: Spin-charge separation and localization in one dimension. Science 308(5718), 88–92 (2005) 7

    work page 2005

  7. [6]

    Science 325(5940), 597–601 (2009)

    Jompol, Y., Ford, C., Griffiths, J., Farrer, I., Jones, G., Anderson, D., Ritchie, D., Silk, T., Schofield, A.: Probing spin-charge separation in a tomonaga-luttinger liquid. Science 325(5940), 597–601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [7]

    Science 343(6171), 631–634 (2014)

    Laroche, D., Gervais, G., Lilly, M., Reno, J.: 1d-1d coulomb drag signature of a luttinger liquid. Science 343(6171), 631–634 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    Nature Physics7(10), 776–780 (2011)

    Blumenstein, C., Sch¨ afer, J., Mietke, S., Meyer, S., Dollinger, A., Lochner, M., Cui, X., Patthey, L., Matzdorf, R., Claessen, R.: Atomically controlled quantum chains hosting a tomonaga–luttinger liquid. Nature Physics7(10), 776–780 (2011)

    2011

  2. [9]

    Physical Review A 58(5), 3395 (1998)

    Monien, H., Linn, M., Elstner, N.: Trapped one-dimensional bose gas as a luttinger liquid. Physical Review A 58(5), 3395 (1998)

    1998

  3. [10]

    Physical Review Letters 87(16), 160405 (2001)

    Greiner, M., Bloch, I., Mandel, O., H¨ ansch, T.W., Esslinger, T.: Exploring phase coherence in a 2d lattice of bose-einstein condensates. Physical Review Letters 87(16), 160405 (2001)

    2001

  4. [11]

    Nature 429(6989), 277–281 (2004)

    Paredes, B., Widera, A., Murg, V., Mandel, O., F¨ olling, S., Cirac, I., Shlyapnikov, G.V., H¨ ansch, T.W., Bloch, I.: Tonks–girardeau gas of ultracold atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 429(6989), 277–281 (2004)

    2004

  5. [12]

    Physical review letters 95(19), 190406 (2005)

    Kinoshita, T., Wenger, T., Weiss, D.S.: Local pair correlations in one-dimensional bose gases. Physical review letters 95(19), 190406 (2005)

    2005

  6. [13]

    Nature 466(7306), 597–600 (2010)

    Haller, E., Hart, R., Mark, M.J., Danzl, J.G., Reichs¨ ollner, L., Gustavsson, M., Dalmonte, M., Pupillo, G., N¨ agerl, H.-C.: Pinning quantum phase transition for a luttinger liquid of strongly interacting bosons. Nature 466(7306), 597–600 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    In: Conference Dynamics and Transport in Quantum Gases (2016)

    Sanchez-Palencia, L.: Mott transition for strongly-interacting one-dimensional bosons in a shallow periodic potential. In: Conference Dynamics and Transport in Quantum Gases (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    Physical review letters 119(16), 165701 (2017)

    Yang, B., Chen, Y.-Y., Zheng, Y.-G., Sun, H., Dai, H.-N., Guan, X.-W., Yuan, Z.-S., Pan, J.-W.: Quantum criticality and the tomonaga-luttinger liquid in one- dimensional bose gases. Physical review letters 119(16), 165701 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    Physical review letters 103(10), 104502 (2009)

    Savard, M., Tremblay-Darveau, C., Gervais, G.: Flow conductance of a single nanohole. Physical review letters 103(10), 104502 (2009)

    2009

  10. [17]

    Physical Review Letters 107(25), 254501 (2011)

    Savard, M., Dauphinais, G., Gervais, G.: Hydrodynamics of superfluid helium in a single nanohole. Physical Review Letters 107(25), 254501 (2011)

    2011

  11. [18]

    Science Advances 1(4), 1400222 (2015)

    Duc, P.-F., Savard, M., Petrescu, M., Rosenow, B., Del Maestro, A., Gervais, G.: Critical flow and dissipation in a quasi–one-dimensional superfluid. Science Advances 1(4), 1400222 (2015)

    2015

  12. [19]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 86(2), 025302 (2012)

    Velasco, A., Friedman, S., Pevarnik, M., Siwy, Z., Taborek, P.: Pressure-driven 8 flow through a single nanopore. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 86(2), 025302 (2012)

    2012

  13. [20]

    Applied Physics Letters 105(3) (2014)

    Velasco, A., Yang, C., Siwy, Z., Toimil-Molares, M., Taborek, P.: Flow and evap- oration in single micrometer and nanometer scale pipes. Applied Physics Letters 105(3) (2014)

    2014

  14. [21]

    Physical Review Fluids 1(5), 054102 (2016)

    Botimer, J., Taborek, P.: Pressure driven flow of superfluid he 4 through a nanopipe. Physical Review Fluids 1(5), 054102 (2016)

    2016

  15. [22]

    nature 359(6397), 710–712 (1992)

    Kresge, a.C., Leonowicz, M.E., Roth, W.J., Vartuli, J., Beck, J.: Ordered meso- porous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. nature 359(6397), 710–712 (1992)

    1992

  16. [23]

    Physical Review Letters 106(10), 105303 (2011)

    Del Maestro, A., Boninsegni, M., Affleck, I.: He 4 luttinger liquid in nanopores. Physical Review Letters 106(10), 105303 (2011)

    2011

  17. [24]

    International Journal of Modern Physics B 26(22), 1244002 (2012)

    Del Maestro, A.: A luttinger liquid core inside helium-4 filled nanopores. International Journal of Modern Physics B 26(22), 1244002 (2012)

    2012

  18. [25]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88(6), 064512 (2013)

    Kulchytskyy, B., Gervais, G., Del Maestro, A.: Local superfluidity at the nanoscale. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88(6), 064512 (2013)

    2013

  19. [26]

    Physical Review B 92(6), 064510 (2015)

    Marki´ c, L.V., Glyde, H.R.: Superfluidity, bec, and dimensions of liquid he 4 in nanopores. Physical Review B 92(6), 064510 (2015)

    2015

  20. [27]

    Physical Review B 102(14), 144505 (2020)

    Nichols, N.S., Prisk, T.R., Warren, G., Sokol, P., Del Maestro, A.: Dimensional reduction of helium-4 inside argon-plated mcm-41 nanopores. Physical Review B 102(14), 144505 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    Nature Communications 13(1), 3168 (2022)

    Del Maestro, A., Nichols, N.S., Prisk, T.R., Warren, G., Sokol, P.E.: Experimen- tal realization of one dimensional helium. Nature Communications 13(1), 3168 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 40(15), 3237–3261 (2001)

    Selvam, P., Bhatia, S.K., Sonwane, C.G.: Recent advances in processing and char- acterization of periodic mesoporous mcm-41 silicate molecular sieves. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 40(15), 3237–3261 (2001)

    2001

  23. [31]

    Journal of the American chemical society 60(2), 309–319 (1938)

    Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E.: Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American chemical society 60(2), 309–319 (1938)

    1938

  24. [32]

    Langmuir 15(16), 5410 (1999) https:// 9 doi.org/10.1021/la990136e

    Jaroniec, M., Kruk, M., Olivier, J.P.: Standard Nitrogen Adsorption Data for Characterization of Nanoporous Silicas. Langmuir 15(16), 5410 (1999) https:// 9 doi.org/10.1021/la990136e

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 19(19), 435 (1951) https://doi.org/10.1021/ la990136e 10

    Band, W.: Mobile Multilayer Adsorption of a Bose-Eeinstein Gas: Helium. The Journal of Chemical Physics 19(19), 435 (1951) https://doi.org/10.1021/ la990136e 10

    1951

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.