Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 56 references

SportMamba: Adaptive Non-Linear Multi-Object Tracking with State Space Models for Team Sports

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a Mamba-attention motion predictor combined with a height-adaptive IoU association metric achieves state-of-the-art multi-object tracking on team-sports datasets.

desk verdict Solid engineering contribution with a plausible but under-specified SOTA claim; the detector split question is the load-bearing issue. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03335 v1 pith:H2TF4FKI submitted 2025-06-03 cs.CV

Dheeraj Khanna , Jerrin Bright , Yuhao Chen , John S. Zelek This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords multi-objecttrackingMambastatespacemodelsmotionpredictiondataassociationocclusionhandlingteamsportsMOT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SportMamba claims that the two difficulties that break trackers in team sports—nonlinear player motion and identity switches under occlusion—can be addressed together by a hybrid tracking-by-detection pipeline. It couples a motion predictor that adds self-attention on top of a Mamba state-space model to capture non-linear trajectories, with a height-adaptive spatial association metric that weights bounding-box overlap by vertical alignment before matching. On the SportsMOT test set the paper reports HOTA 77.3, IDF1 77.7, and DetA 89.5, ahead of prior learning-based trackers, and on VIP-HTD ice hockey it reports HOTA 65.1 without any tracker-specific fine-tuning. The result matters because it suggests a practical, near-real-time (about 30 FPS) recipe for sports tracking that does not rely heavily on appearance cues, which are unreliable when teammates wear identical jerseys.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pairing of a Mamba-attention motion predictor with a height-adaptive spatial association cost. The motion predictor embeds a tracklet of past bounding boxes, passes them through $M$ stacked blocks that alternate a selective state-space model (Mamba) with multi-head self-attention, and regresses the next-frame box with an MLP. The association side replaces the standard IoU with $\mathrm{HA\text{-}EIoU} = \mathrm{HIoU} \cdot \mathrm{EIoU}$, where EIoU computes IoU on boxes widened by buffers $b_1$ and $b_2$, and HIoU is the ratio of vertical-overlap height to total vertical extent, so matches require both horizontal overlap and depth-consistent height alignment. A weighted sum with appearance cosine similarity feeds a Hungarian solver, and unmatched low-confidence detections are recovered in a second pass using only HA-EIoU. Adaptive buffer sizes and a confidence-dependent EMA feature update complete the pipeline.

What would settle it

Retrain and rerun SportMamba on SportsMOT with the detector trained strictly on the train split, with $\lambda_{\mathrm{reid}}$ and $\lambda_{\mathrm{ssim}}$ chosen by validation, and compare HOTA against Deep-EIoU under the same detector and ReID settings; if the reported margin disappears or reverses, the claimed advantage is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that replacing the usual linear-motion assumption with a learned Mamba-attention motion predictor, and replacing plain IoU with a height-adaptive extended IoU, is enough to push multi-object tracking in team sports past previous methods. Concretely, SportMamba scores 77.3 HOTA, 77.7 IDF1, and 89.5 DetA on the SportsMOT test set, the highest HOTA among the compared methods, and 65.1 HOTA on VIP-HTD in a zero-shot setting where no tracker-specific training on that dataset is performed. The paper attributes the gains to two components working together: the motion predictor models non-linear, non-appearance-based motion, and the height-adaptive metric (HA-EIoU) reduces wrong matches when players partially occlude one another and their box heights change with depth. The qualitative results show identity preservation after occlusion where the diffusion- and Mamba-based baselines fragment tracks.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that SportMamba is state of the art assumes the comparison is apples-to-apples: the paper does not report whether the YOLOX detector was trained only on the SportsMOT training split, and it does not give the association weights $\lambda_{\mathrm{reid}}$ and $\lambda_{\mathrm{ssim}}$ or the ReID model, so the gap over prior methods could shrink if those were fixed differently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the SportsMOT test set the method reports the highest HOTA among the compared trackers (77.3), including filter-based and learning-based baselines, at roughly 30 FPS inference.
  • The two-stage association means low-confidence detections are still consumed, so the tracker can recover tracks that momentarily lose high-confidence detections, which is the regime where identity switches occur in sports footage.
  • The zero-shot VIP-HTD result (HOTA 65.1) indicates that the learned motion predictor and height-adaptive metric transfer to a faster sport without retraining.
  • Height adaptation alone contributes about 0.9 HOTA and 1.1 IDF1 over extended IoU on the SportsMOT validation set, according to the ablation, so depth-scale alignment is a measurable source of the gain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension the paper leaves implicit is to apply the HA-EIoU cost to filter-based trackers such as ByteTrack or OC-SORT while keeping their Kalman motion model; if most of the gain transfers, the contribution lives in the association metric rather than in the Mamba predictor.
  • The adaptive buffers $b_1$ and $b_2$ are chosen by a validation sweep rather than learned; one could make them functions of predicted speed or detection confidence so the search space grows only when motion is fast, a natural next step not explored here.
  • To the extent that the detector is trained on SportsMOT and then applied to VIP-HTD, the zero-shot evidence tests the motion predictor and association metric more than the detector itself, so the generalization claim should be read with that scope in mind.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SportMamba, a tracking-by-detection multi-object tracker for team sports. The method consists of a YOLOX detector, a Mamba-based motion predictor augmented with multi-head self-attention, a hybrid association cost that combines ReID appearance features with a height-adaptive extended IoU (HA-EIoU), and a two-stage high/low confidence association pipeline with dynamic EMA feature updating. The authors report state-of-the-art HOTA on the SportsMOT test set (77.3) and the highest HOTA on VIP-HTD in a zero-shot setting (65.1), with ablations on SportsMOT validation showing that HA-EIoU improves over EIoU and that buffer sizes and Mamba block counts affect performance.

Significance. If the results are reproducible under the stated protocol, the paper demonstrates a meaningful improvement on a challenging sports MOT benchmark: the Table 1 HOTA margin over Deep-EIoU is small (77.3 vs 77.2) but positive, and the zero-shot VIP-HTD result in Table 2 is a useful generalization datapoint. The validation ablation in Table 5 cleanly isolates the association metric and gives quantitative support for the HA-EIoU idea, and Tables 3 and 4 provide systematic sweeps over M, w, and buffer sizes. However, the significance is currently limited by missing protocol details: the detector training split is not stated, several association hyperparameters and the ReID backbone are unreported, the MHSA component is not ablated, and the HIoU formula in Eq. (8) appears to contain a sign error. These gaps prevent the reader from verifying that the headline comparison is apples-to-apples.

major comments (5)
  1. [§4.1, Tables 1–2] The training split for the YOLOX detector is never stated. Table 1 uses an asterisk to mark methods that train the detector on train+val, and SportMamba is unmarked, which implicitly asserts train-only training; however, §4.1 only says 'Following prior works ..., we train a YOLOX model' without specifying the split. Because the HOTA margin over Deep-EIoU is only 0.1 (77.3 vs 77.2), and because the same omission affects the zero-shot VIP-HTD experiment in Table 2, the SOTA claim is not verifiable unless the authors state the exact split and confirm that no VIP-HTD training data were used for the detector or motion predictor.
  2. [Eq. (8), §3.3.1] The absolute value in the HIoU formula is incorrect for non-overlapping bounding boxes. When min(y2, y-hat2) - max(y1, y-hat1) is negative, the absolute value converts the vertical gap into a positive numerator, so vertically separated boxes receive a positive height-similarity score that grows with separation instead of a score of zero for no overlap. Since HA-EIoU is a central contribution and is the basis of the Table 5 ablation, the formula should be corrected to use a clamped overlap, e.g., max(0, min(y2, y-hat2) - max(y1, y-hat1)) divided by the union height, and the experiments should be re-run or the corrected metric should be justified.
  3. [§3.2, Table 3] The claimed benefit of the Mamba-attention mechanism is not ablated. Table 3 varies the number of Mamba-attention blocks M and the tracklet window w, but never removes the MHSA block to compare against a vanilla Mamba encoder. Without such a comparison, the paper's first stated technical contribution, the mamba-attention motion predictor, is not empirically supported.
  4. [Eqs. (10), (12), §4.1] Several load-bearing hyperparameters are not reported: the association weights lambda_reid and lambda_ssim in Eq. (10), the EMA smoothing base alpha and the minimum confidence threshold sigma in Eq. (12), and the backbone used for ReID feature extraction. These values are needed to reproduce the method and to rule out that they were selected on the test set. The hybrid cost and dynamic EMA are central pipeline components, so this omission is a reproducibility gap.
  5. [Abstract and §3.3] The buffers b1 and b2 are described as 'adaptive' in the abstract and contributions, but in the method they are fixed scalar hyperparameters selected by the validation sweep in Table 4; no per-detection, per-frame, or per-sequence adaptation mechanism is described. Either the mechanism should be made adaptive, or the terminology should be revised to avoid overclaiming.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§5] The dataset name is misspelled as 'sportMOT' in the conclusion; it should be 'SportsMOT'.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The dataset name 'VIT-HTD' should be 'VIP-HTD'.
  3. [References] References [39] and [40] appear to be the same HockeyMOT paper, and references [43] and [44] are the same MambaTrack paper; duplicate entries should be merged.
  4. [Eq. (14)] The smooth L1 loss is missing the conventional 0.5 factor in the quadratic region; either correct the formula or state the chosen convention explicitly.
  5. [Eq. (12)] The dynamic EMA update is undefined for detection confidences below sigma, since s_t - sigma can be negative and alpha_d can fall outside a meaningful range; the allowed domain of s_t for this update should be stated.
  6. [Tables 3–5 vs Table 1] The validation HOTA scores in Tables 3–5 are near 84 while the test HOTA in Table 1 is 77.3; this large gap is not discussed and a brief explanation would help readers interpret the ablations.
  7. [Abstract and Table 1] The abstract claims 'state-of-the-art performance on various metrics,' but Table 1 shows that Deep-EIoU has higher IDF1 (79.8 vs 77.7) and AssA (67.7 vs 66.8); the claim should be qualified to HOTA and DetA.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SportMamba's SOTA claims rest on external benchmark measurements, not on a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

SportMamba is an empirical tracking pipeline. Its two technical contributions—the mamba-attention motion predictor (Eqs. 1–5) and the height-adaptive EIoU association metric (Eqs. 6–8)—are defined and then measured against held-out test sets (Tables 1–5, VIP-HTD). No equation in the paper defines a predicted quantity in terms of the target metric or fits a parameter to the quantity it later calls a prediction. The ablation tables (Tables 3–5) select hyperparameters such as buffer sizes b1,b2 and block count M using the SportsMOT validation set; reporting the best validation configuration is standard hyperparameter selection, not a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction, and the HA-EIoU-vs-EIoU comparison uses the same metric protocol. The asterisk convention distinguishing train+val detector training from train-only is a reporting ambiguity that affects the fairness of the SOTA comparison, but it is a verification gap, not a circularity. Self-citations (VIP-HTD benchmark, HockeyMOT) are dataset and prior-work references and are not load-bearing for the central claim. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The core benchmark results are independently computed against fixed dataset labels and prior published numbers.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on empirical components: a pre-trained/fine-tuned detector, a ReID feature extractor, and a learned motion predictor. The free parameters are the buffer sizes, the architecture depth/window, and the association and EMA weights, several of which are either tuned on validation or not reported. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • buffer sizes b1, b2 = b1=0.4, b2=0.3
    Chosen from the validation-set grid in Table 4 to maximize HOTA; used for test and VIP-HTD zero-shot evaluation.
  • Mamba-attention blocks M and tracklet window w = M=4, w=10
    Selected from validation search in Table 3; not a theoretically derived setting.
  • hybrid cost weights lambda_reid, lambda_ssim
    Appear in Eq. (10) but are not reported in Section 4.1; the association result depends on them.
  • EMA smoothing alpha and minimum confidence sigma
    Used in Eq. (12) for dynamic feature updates; values not disclosed.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption YOLOX detections and FastReID appearance embeddings are accurate enough for the association to work.
    The entire pipeline depends on off-the-shelf detection and ReID models; Section 4.1 states a YOLOX model is trained but gives no quantitative detection quality analysis.
  • domain assumption The SportsMOT and VIP-HTD annotations and evaluation protocols are correct and comparable across methods.
    The SOTA claim is read directly from Tables 1 and 2; the paper does not independently verify the benchmark.
  • ad hoc to paper HIoU as defined in Eq. (8) is a valid measure of height alignment for association.
    The metric is introduced for this paper and is the basis of the HA-EIoU ablation; its absolute value can rate vertically separated boxes as aligned, so this assumption is questionable.
  • standard math The Mamba state-space discretization with ZOH (Eq. 1) is a valid model of player motion.
    This is a standard background result used by the Mamba architecture; not independently derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SportMamba: Adaptive Non-Linear Multi-Object Tracking with State Space Models for Team Sports." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H2TF4FKI

@misc{pith2026250603335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SportMamba: Adaptive Non-Linear Multi-Object Tracking with State Space Models for Team Sports},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H2TF4FKI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03335}
}
read the original abstract

Multi-object tracking (MOT) in team sports is particularly challenging due to the fast-paced motion and frequent occlusions resulting in motion blur and identity switches, respectively. Predicting player positions in such scenarios is particularly difficult due to the observed highly non-linear motion patterns. Current methods are heavily reliant on object detection and appearance-based tracking, which struggle to perform in complex team sports scenarios, where appearance cues are ambiguous and motion patterns do not necessarily follow a linear pattern. To address these challenges, we introduce SportMamba, an adaptive hybrid MOT technique specifically designed for tracking in dynamic team sports. The technical contribution of SportMamba is twofold. First, we introduce a mamba-attention mechanism that models non-linear motion by implicitly focusing on relevant embedding dependencies. Second, we propose a height-adaptive spatial association metric to reduce ID switches caused by partial occlusions by accounting for scale variations due to depth changes. Additionally, we extend the detection search space with adaptive buffers to improve associations in fast-motion scenarios. Our proposed technique, SportMamba, demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on various metrics in the SportsMOT dataset, which is characterized by complex motion and severe occlusion. Furthermore, we demonstrate its generalization capability through zero-shot transfer to VIP-HTD, an ice hockey dataset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of HOTA and IDF1 score on SportsMOT dataset with recent learning-based methods. State-of-the-art (SOTA) performance compared to prior works is demonstrated with the proposed SportMamba model. Methods marked with * use training and validation data for the object detector. The primary objective of MOT is to temporally track ob￾jects while maintaining unique identities. However, factors such as occlusion, mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of SportMamba. The architecture follows a four-stage process: (1) A fine-tuned object detector detects players; (2) A motion predictor estimates future player positions based on past tracklets; (3) A high-confidence association using a hybrid matching metric integrating appearance modeling and a hybrid cost estimated by a height-adaptive IoU with extended buffers. (4) Low-confidence and unmatched matches fr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the Motion Prediction Model. The model first encodes past object trajectories (Tin) using a Token Embedding Layer, followed by a Mamba-Attention Encoder that models long-range motion dependencies using a discretized state-space representation. An MHSA Block refines the Mamba-encoded features followed by FFN for feature transformation. After passing through M stacked Mamba-Attention blocks, the final repr… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual Representation of HIoU against EIoU. (a) Vi￾sualizes the detection with groundtruth (in blue) and prediction (in red); (b) Representation of the HIoU metric; which is the height overlap by the total height; (c) Extended bounding box represented with dotted lines…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of SportMamba in SportsMOT dataset on two categories: a) basketball and b) soccer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison of SportMamba in VIT￾HTD dataset. re-associates player identities after occlusion. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    BoT- SORT: Robust Associations Multi-Pedestrian Tracking,

    Nir Aharon, Roy Orfaig, and Ben-Zion Bobrovsky. BoT- SORT: Robust Associations Multi-Pedestrian Tracking,

  2. [2]

    Evaluating mul- tiple object tracking performance: the clear mot metrics

    Keni Bernardin and Rainer Stiefelhagen. Evaluating mul- tiple object tracking performance: the clear mot metrics. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2008:1– 10, 2008. 6

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Simple online and realtime tracking

    Alex Bewley, Zongyuan Ge, Lionel Ott, Fabio Ramos, and Ben Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In2016 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), pages 3464–3468. IEEE, 2016. 1, 2

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Mitigating mo- tion blur for robust 3d baseball player pose modeling for pitch analysis

    Jerrin Bright, Yuhao Chen, and John Zelek. Mitigating mo- tion blur for robust 3d baseball player pose modeling for pitch analysis. InProceedings of the 6th International Work- shop on Multimedia Content Analysis in Sports, pages 63– 71, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Observation-centric sort: Rethink- ing sort for robust multi-object tracking

    Jinkun Cao, Jiangmiao Pang, Xinshuo Weng, Rawal Khi- rodkar, and Kris Kitani. Observation-centric sort: Rethink- ing sort for robust multi-object tracking. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9686–9696, 2023. 1, 2, 6, 7

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    End-to- end object detection with transformers

    Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-to- end object detection with transformers. InEuropean confer- ence on computer vision, pages 213–229. Springer, 2020. 1, 2

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Mixformer: End-to-end tracking with iterative mixed atten- tion

    Yutao Cui, Cheng Jiang, Limin Wang, and Gangshan Wu. Mixformer: End-to-end tracking with iterative mixed atten- tion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition, pages 13608–13618,

  8. [8]

    Sportsmot: A large multi- object tracking dataset in multiple sports scenes

    Yutao Cui, Chenkai Zeng, Xiaoyu Zhao, Yichun Yang, Gangshan Wu, and Limin Wang. Sportsmot: A large multi- object tracking dataset in multiple sports scenes. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 9921–9931, 2023. 1, 2, 6, 7

    work page 2023

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Non linear filtering: Interacting particle solution.Markov Processes and Related Fields, 2:555–580,

    Pierre Del Moral. Non linear filtering: Interacting particle solution.Markov Processes and Related Fields, 2:555–580,

  2. [10]

    Giaotracker: A compre- hensive framework for mcmot with global information and optimizing strategies in visdrone 2021

    Yunhao Du, Junfeng Wan, Yanyun Zhao, Binyu Zhang, Zhi- hang Tong, and Junhao Dong. Giaotracker: A compre- hensive framework for mcmot with global information and optimizing strategies in visdrone 2021. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International conference on computer vision, ...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Strongsort: Make deep- sort great again.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25: 8725–8737, 2023

    Yunhao Du, Zhicheng Zhao, Yang Song, Yanyun Zhao, Fei Su, Tao Gong, and Hongying Meng. Strongsort: Make deep- sort great again.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25: 8725–8737, 2023. 2, 5, 6

    2023

  4. [12]

    Qdtrack: Quasi-dense similarity learning for appearance-only multi- ple object tracking.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023

    Tobias Fischer, Thomas E Huang, Jiangmiao Pang, Linlu Qiu, Haofeng Chen, Trevor Darrell, and Fisher Yu. Qdtrack: Quasi-dense similarity learning for appearance-only multi- ple object tracking.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023. 7

    2023

  5. [13]

    Memotr: Long-term memory-augmented transformer for multi-object tracking

    Ruopeng Gao and Limin Wang. Memotr: Long-term memory-augmented transformer for multi-object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 9901–9910, 2023. 1

    2023

  6. [14]

    YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021, 2021

    Zheng Ge, Songtao Liu, Feng Wang, Zeming Li, and Jian Sun. YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021, 2021. arXiv:2107.08430 [cs]. 1, 2, 6

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite

    Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, and Raquel Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite. InConference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), 2012. 1

    2012

  8. [16]

    Soccernet: A scalable dataset for action spotting in soccer videos

    Silvio Giancola, Mohieddine Amine, Tarek Dghaily, and Bernard Ghanem. Soccernet: A scalable dataset for action spotting in soccer videos. InProceedings of the IEEE confer- ence on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 1711–1721, 2018. 1, 2

    2018

  9. [17]

    Fast r-cnn

    Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. InProceedings of the IEEE inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 1440–1448,

  10. [18]

    Deep HM-SORT: Enhancing Multi-Object Tracking in Sports with Deep Features, Har- monic Mean, and Expansion IOU, 2024

    Matias Gran-Henriksen, Hans Andreas Lindgaard, Gabriel Kiss, and Frank Lindseth. Deep HM-SORT: Enhancing Multi-Object Tracking in Sports with Deep Features, Har- monic Mean, and Expansion IOU, 2024. arXiv:2406.12081 [cs]. 2

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Mamba: Linear-Time Se- quence Modeling with Selective State Spaces, 2024

    Albert Gu and Tri Dao. Mamba: Linear-Time Se- quence Modeling with Selective State Spaces, 2024. arXiv:2312.00752 [cs]. 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    FastReID: A Pytorch Toolbox for Gen- eral Instance Re-identification, 2020

    Lingxiao He, Xingyu Liao, Wu Liu, Xinchen Liu, Peng Cheng, and Tao Mei. FastReID: A Pytorch Toolbox for Gen- eral Instance Re-identification, 2020. arXiv:2006.02631 [cs]. 1, 5

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    TrackSSM: A General Motion Predictor by State-Space Model, 2024

    Bin Hu, Run Luo, Zelin Liu, Cheng Wang, and Wenyu Liu. TrackSSM: A General Motion Predictor by State-Space Model, 2024. arXiv:2409.00487 [cs]. 1, 2, 7

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Mambamot: State- space model as motion predictor for multi-object tracking

    Hsiang-Wei Huang, Cheng-Yen Yang, Wenhao Chai, Zhongyu Jiang, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. Mambamot: State- space model as motion predictor for multi-object tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10826, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Exploring Learning- based Motion Models in Multi-Object Tracking, 2024

    Hsiang-Wei Huang, Cheng-Yen Yang, Wenhao Chai, Zhongyu Jiang, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. Exploring Learning- based Motion Models in Multi-Object Tracking, 2024. 7

    2024

  16. [24]

    Iterative scale-up expansioniou and deep features association for multi-object tracking in sports

    Hsiang-Wei Huang, Cheng-Yen Yang, Jiacheng Sun, Pyong- Kun Kim, Kwang-Ju Kim, Kyoungoh Lee, Chung-I Huang, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. Iterative scale-up expansioniou and deep features association for multi-object tracking in sports. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on...

    2024

  17. [25]

    R. E. Kalman. A new approach to linear filtering and predic- tion problems.Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1):35–45,

  18. [26]

    H. W. Kuhn. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem.Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1-2):83–97,

  19. [27]

    Hota: A higher order metric for evaluating multi-object tracking.International journal of computer vision, 129:548– 578, 2021

    Jonathon Luiten, Aljosa Osep, Patrick Dendorfer, Philip Torr, Andreas Geiger, Laura Leal-Taix´e, and Bastian Leibe. Hota: A higher order metric for evaluating multi-object tracking.International journal of computer vision, 129:548– 578, 2021. 6

    2021

  20. [28]

    Diffusiontrack: Diffusion model for multi-object tracking

    Run Luo, Zikai Song, Lintao Ma, Jinlin Wei, Wei Yang, and Min Yang. Diffusiontrack: Diffusion model for multi-object tracking. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence, pages 3991–3999, 2024. 2

    2024

  21. [29]

    Diffmot: A real-time diffusion-based multiple object tracker with non-linear prediction

    Weiyi Lv, Yuhang Huang, Ning Zhang, Ruei-Sung Lin, Mei Han, and Dan Zeng. Diffmot: A real-time diffusion-based multiple object tracker with non-linear prediction. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19321–19330, 2024. 2, 6, 7

    2024

  22. [30]

    Deep oc-sort: Multi-pedestrian tracking by adaptive re-identification

    Gerard Maggiolino, Adnan Ahmad, Jinkun Cao, and Kris Kitani. Deep oc-sort: Multi-pedestrian tracking by adaptive re-identification. In2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 3025–3029. IEEE, 2023. 2, 6

    2023

  23. [31]

    Trackformer: Multi-object track- ing with transformers

    Tim Meinhardt, Alexander Kirillov, Laura Leal-Taixe, and Christoph Feichtenhofer. Trackformer: Multi-object track- ing with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8844–8854, 2022. 1

    2022

  24. [32]

    Vip-htd: A public benchmark for multi-player tracking in ice hockey.Journal of Computa- tional Vision and Imaging Systems, 9(1):22–25, 2023

    Harish Prakash, Yuhao Chen, Sirisha Rambhatla, David A Clausi, and John Zelek. Vip-htd: A public benchmark for multi-player tracking in ice hockey.Journal of Computa- tional Vision and Imaging Systems, 9(1):22–25, 2023. 1, 2, 6

    2023

  25. [33]

    Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with re- gion proposal networks

    Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with re- gion proposal networks. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2015. 1

    2015

  26. [34]

    Performance measures and a data set for multi-target, multi-camera tracking

    Ergys Ristani, Francesco Solera, Roger Zou, Rita Cucchiara, and Carlo Tomasi. Performance measures and a data set for multi-target, multi-camera tracking. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 17–35. Springer, 2016. 6

    2016

  27. [35]

    Probabilistic track- let scoring and inpainting for multiple object tracking

    Fatemeh Saleh, Sadegh Aliakbarian, Hamid Rezatofighi, Mathieu Salzmann, and Stephen Gould. Probabilistic track- let scoring and inpainting for multiple object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 14329–14339, 2021. 2

    2021

  28. [36]

    TransTrack: Multiple Object Tracking with Transformer,

    Peize Sun, Jinkun Cao, Yi Jiang, Rufeng Zhang, Enze Xie, Zehuan Yuan, Changhu Wang, and Ping Luo. TransTrack: Multiple Object Tracking with Transformer,

  29. [37]

    Dancetrack: Multi-object track- ing in uniform appearance and diverse motion

    Peize Sun, Jinkun Cao, Yi Jiang, Zehuan Yuan, Song Bai, Kris Kitani, and Ping Luo. Dancetrack: Multi-object track- ing in uniform appearance and diverse motion. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20993–21002, 2022. 1

    2022

  30. [38]

    Attention is all you need.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017

    A Vaswani. Attention is all you need.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. 2

    2017

  31. [39]

    Clausi, and John S

    Kanav Vats, Pascale Walters, Mehrnaz Fani, David A. Clausi, and John S. Zelek. Player tracking and identifica- tion in ice hockey.Expert Systems with Applications, 213: 119250, 2023. 1

    2023

  32. [40]

    Player tracking and identification in ice hockey.Expert systems with applications, 213:119250,

    Kanav Vats, Pascale Walters, Mehrnaz Fani, David A Clausi, and John S Zelek. Player tracking and identification in ice hockey.Expert systems with applications, 213:119250,

  33. [41]

    Rnns are not transformers (yet): The key bottleneck on in-context re- trieval.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18510, 2024

    Kaiyue Wen, Xingyu Dang, and Kaifeng Lyu. Rnns are not transformers (yet): The key bottleneck on in-context re- trieval.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18510, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric

    Nicolai Wojke, Alex Bewley, and Dietrich Paulus. Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric. In2017 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), pages 3645–3649. IEEE, 2017. 1, 2

    2017

  35. [44]

    Mambatrack: a simple baseline for multiple object tracking with state space model

    Changcheng Xiao, Qiong Cao, Zhigang Luo, and Long Lan. Mambatrack: a simple baseline for multiple object tracking with state space model. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 4082–4091,

  36. [45]

    Motiontrack: Learning motion predictor for multiple object tracking.Neu- ral Networks, 179:106539, 2024

    Changcheng Xiao, Qiong Cao, Yujie Zhong, Long Lan, Xi- ang Zhang, Zhigang Luo, and Dacheng Tao. Motiontrack: Learning motion predictor for multiple object tracking.Neu- ral Networks, 179:106539, 2024. 1, 2, 7

    2024

  37. [46]

    Robust tracking via mamba- based context-aware token learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13611, 2024

    Jinxia Xie, Bineng Zhong, Qihua Liang, Ning Li, Zhiyi Mo, and Shuxiang Song. Robust tracking via mamba- based context-aware token learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13611, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Hard to track objects with irregular motions and sim- ilar appearances? make it easier by buffering the matching space

    Fan Yang, Shigeyuki Odashima, Shoichi Masui, and Shan Jiang. Hard to track objects with irregular motions and sim- ilar appearances? make it easier by buffering the matching space. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pages 4799–4...

    2023

  39. [48]

    MOTRv3: Release-fetch supervi- sion for end-to-end multi-object tracking, 2024

    En Yu, Tiancai Wang, Zhuoling Li, Yuang Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang, and Wenbing Tao. MOTRv3: Release-fetch supervi- sion for end-to-end multi-object tracking, 2024. 1

    2024

  40. [49]

    Bdd100k: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning

    Fisher Yu, Haofeng Chen, Xin Wang, Wenqi Xian, Yingying Chen, Fangchen Liu, Vashisht Madhavan, and Trevor Dar- rell. Bdd100k: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, ...

    2020

  41. [50]

    Motr: End-to-end multiple- object tracking with transformer

    Fangao Zeng, Bin Dong, Yuang Zhang, Tiancai Wang, Xi- angyu Zhang, and Yichen Wei. Motr: End-to-end multiple- object tracking with transformer. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 659–675. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  42. [51]

    Fairmot: On the fairness of detection and re-identification in multiple object tracking.International journal of computer vision, 129:3069–3087, 2021

    Yifu Zhang, Chunyu Wang, Xinggang Wang, Wenjun Zeng, and Wenyu Liu. Fairmot: On the fairness of detection and re-identification in multiple object tracking.International journal of computer vision, 129:3069–3087, 2021. 7

    2021

  43. [52]

    Bytetrack: Multi-object tracking by associating every detection box

    Yifu Zhang, Peize Sun, Yi Jiang, Dongdong Yu, Fucheng Weng, Zehuan Yuan, Ping Luo, Wenyu Liu, and Xinggang Wang. Bytetrack: Multi-object tracking by associating every detection box. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 1–21. Springer, 2022. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7

    2022

  44. [53]

    Learning generalisable omni-scale representations for person re-identification.TPAMI, 2021

    Kaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Andrea Cavallaro, and Tao Xiang. Learning generalisable omni-scale representations for person re-identification.TPAMI, 2021. 1

    2021

  45. [54]

    Ob- jects as Points, 2019

    Xingyi Zhou, Dequan Wang, and Philipp Kr ¨ahenb¨uhl. Ob- jects as Points, 2019. arXiv:1904.07850 [cs]. 1, 2

    2019 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Tracking objects as points

    Xingyi Zhou, Vladlen Koltun, and Philipp Kr ¨ahenb¨uhl. Tracking objects as points. InEuropean conference on com- puter vision, pages 474–490. Springer, 2020. 7

    2020

  47. [56]

    Global tracking transformers

    Xingyi Zhou, Tianwei Yin, Vladlen Koltun, and Philipp Kr¨ahenb¨uhl. Global tracking transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 8771–8780, 2022. 7

    2022

  48. [2022]

    arXiv:2206.14651. 2, 5, 7

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.