Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Differential equations for a class of semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A degree-three Pearson-type weight equation forces explicit differential equations for unit-circle orthogonal polynomials.

desk verdict A genuine degree-three extension with explicit structure relations and differential equations; the main theorems are correctly hedged, but the advertised class needs a boundary-condition qualifier and one coefficient elimination needs more detail. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03432 v1 pith:2QQKDTBV submitted 2025-06-03 math.CA

Cleonice F. Bracciali , Karina S. Rampazzi , Luana L. Silva Ribeiro This is my paper
classification math.CA MSC 42C0533C47
keywords orthogonalpolynomialsontheunitcirclesemiclassicalweightfunctionsPearson-typedifferentialequationstructurerelationsdifferenceequationsdiscretePainlevéIIVerblunskycoefficientsJacobi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that a single differential assumption on the weight—a Pearson-type equation $d[A(e^{i\theta})w(\theta)]/d\theta = B(e^{i\theta})w(\theta)$ with $A,B$ complex polynomials of degree at most three—controls the whole orthogonal-polynomial family on the unit circle. Once the boundary condition $A(1)[w(2\pi)-w(0)]=0$ holds, the monic orthogonal polynomials $\Phi_n$ and their reversed polynomials $\Phi_n^*$ satisfy explicit first-order differential systems, and the same machinery yields second-order scalar equations for both. The same structure relation produces nonlinear difference equations for the Verblunsky coefficients, including a discrete Painlev\'e II equation in symmetric cases. Applications give concrete differential equations for families generalizing Jacobi polynomials on the unit circle and for modified Bessel polynomials, recovering several known equations as special cases. The value of the result is that it converts a hypothesis about the weight into ready-to-use formulas in the coefficients of the polynomials.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the vanishing identity (2.2): under the boundary hypothesis, $\langle A(z)\Phi_n'(z), z^k\rangle = 0$ for the middle range $k=2,\dots,n-2$. This forces the expansion of $A(z)\Phi_n'(z)-n a_3\Phi_{n+2}(z)$ into the orthogonal basis to collapse to five terms, producing the structure relation of Theorem 2.1 with coefficients $s_{n,n+1},s_{n,n},s_{n,n-1},p_{n,n},t_{n,n}$ computed from $A,B,\alpha_n,\ell_{n,k}$. Szeg\H{o}'s recurrences for the reversed polynomial $\Phi_n^*(z)=z^n\Phi_n(1/z)$ then convert that relation into the first-order systems (3.1)–(3.2), and elimination via an integrating factor yields the second-order equations. The named objects carrying the proof are the monic orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle (MOPUC), the reversed polynomial, and the Verblunsky coefficients—the constants $\alpha_n$ that parametrize the Szeg\H{o} recurrences.

What would settle it

Take a weight satisfying all hypotheses, such as $w(\theta)=e^{-\eta\theta}[\sin^2(\theta/2)]^{\lambda}[\cos^2(\theta/2)]^{\beta}$ with $\eta,\lambda,\beta$ nonzero, construct $\Phi_3$ explicitly from the Szegő recurrences and the known initial Verblunsky coefficients, and check whether $zA(z)\Phi_3'(z)-U_3(z)\Phi_3(z)-V_3(z)\Phi_3^*(z)$ is identically zero with $U_3,V_3$ as in Theorem 3.1. Any nonzero polynomial coefficient would disprove the structure relation; the same check with $\beta=0$ should reproduce Corollary 4.3 as a control.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that whenever a positive weight $w$ satisfies (1.5) with $\deg A,\deg B \le 3$ and $A(1)[w(2\pi)-w(0)] = 0$, the associated MOPUC obey the structure relation of Theorem 2.1, from which the paper derives the first-order systems (3.1)–(3.2) for $\Phi_n$ and $\Phi_n^*$ and then explicit second-order differential equations in Theorems 3.6 and 3.8. All coefficients $U_n,V_n,W_n,Y_n$ are written explicitly in terms of $A$, $B$, the Verblunsky coefficients $\alpha_n$, and the sub-leading coefficients $\ell_{n,k}$. Theorem 2.3 gives a difference equation for the $\alpha_n$; for the symmetric weight $e^{t\cos\theta}[\sin^2(\theta/2)]^\lambda$ this becomes the discrete Painlev\'e II equation (1.7). The applications show that modified Bessel polynomials, circular Jacobi polynomials, Jacobi polynomials on the unit circle, and a further two-parameter family all fall under the same formulas, with earlier differential equations recovered as limiting cases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the boundary condition $A(1)[w(2\pi)-w(0)] = 0$; if a weight in this Pearson class has $w(2\pi)\ne w(0)$ with $A(1)\ne 0$, the key identity (2.2) fails and the structure relation must be modified before any of the differential equations can be derived.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every monic orthogonal polynomial in the class with $p,q\le 3$ comes with explicit first- and second-order differential equations expressed directly through $A$, $B$, the Verblunsky coefficients, and the sub-leading coefficients $\ell_{n,k}$.
  • Evaluating the structure relation at $z=0$ yields nonlinear difference equations for the Verblunsky coefficients; for symmetric weights such as $e^{t\cos\theta}[\sin^2(\theta/2)]^\lambda$ these reduce to the discrete Painlev\'e II equation (1.7).
  • Known families—modified Bessel polynomials, circular Jacobi polynomials, Jacobi polynomials on the unit circle, and the weight of Example 2—are covered by one set of formulas, and the differential equations recover earlier results as special cases.
  • The second-order equation for $\Phi_n$ is linear when $V_n'(z)=0$; when $V_n'\ne 0$, Corollary 3.7 supplies an explicitly linear second-order equation under the condition $V_n\ne 0$, with the analogous statement for $\Phi_n^*$ via $W_n$.
  • The discrete recurrences give a practical way to generate the Verblunsky coefficients numerically, avoiding the increasingly costly determinant evaluations of Heine's formula, as demonstrated in Section 5.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the boundary condition $A(1)[w(2\pi)-w(0)]=0$ is dropped, carrying the extra term $-i\Phi_n(1)A(1)[w(2\pi)-w(0)]$ through the same projection argument should produce a nonhomogeneous correction in the structure relation and the differential systems; this is a natural next test for quasi-semiclassical circle weights.
  • The pattern of the coefficients suggests a plausible extension to $A,B$ of arbitrary degree $d$, with a structure relation whose number of terms grows linearly in $d$; trying $d=4$ would reveal whether the coefficient construction remains closed or new obstructions appear.
  • Because the symmetric-case recurrence is a discrete Painlev\'e II equation, the numerical scheme of Section 5 could be pushed further to scan the $(\lambda,t)$ parameter plane and locate transitions in $|\alpha_n|$; the paper only displays a few parameter choices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle whose weight satisfies the Pearson-type equation (1.5) with A and B polynomials of degree at most three. Under the hypothesis A(1)[w(2π)-w(0)]=0, the authors derive structure relations for the monic orthogonal polynomials (Theorem 2.1), first-order differential equations for Φ_n and Φ*_n (Theorem 3.1), second-order equations (Theorems 3.6 and 3.8), and difference equations for the Verblunsky coefficients (Theorem 2.3). Five families of weights are then treated as applications, including generalizations of circular Jacobi and modified Bessel polynomials, and a discrete Painlevé II equation is exhibited for the modified circular Jacobi case. The proofs are detailed and proceed by standard orthogonality and integration-by-parts arguments.

Significance. If the scope is stated precisely, the paper gives useful and explicit structure relations and differential equations for a substantial family of semiclassical OPUC. The coefficient formulas are concrete, the difference equations for Verblunsky coefficients are of independent interest, and the applications to known families and to discrete Painlevé II are valuable. The comparison with prior work [4] and the numerical verification in Section 5 are appropriate. The main theorems appear correct under the stated boundary hypothesis, and I found no circularity.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.2), Theorem 2.1, and §5 final paragraph] The boundary hypothesis A(1)[w(2π)-w(0)]=0 is load-bearing for the whole development, since Eq. (2.2) is used in the proof of Theorem 2.1 to force s_{n,k}=0 for k=2,...,n-2. This condition is not a consequence of the Pearson equation (1.5) with deg A, deg B ≤ 3. For example, w(θ)=e^{-ηθ}, η≠0, with A(z)=1 and B(z)=-η satisfies (1.5) and belongs to the class (0,0), but A(1)[w(2π)-w(0)]=e^{-2πη}-1≠0, so Eq. (2.2) fails and the structure relation formulas are not established for this weight. The theorems themselves state the hypothesis, but the Abstract and the final paragraph ('we provided explicit first and second order differential equations for semiclassical MOPUC belonging to the class (p,q), with p≤3 and q≤3') overstate the proven scope. Please redefine the class under study to include the boundary condition, or explicitly state that all results are for weights satisfying (1.5) and A(1)[w(2π)-w(0)]=0, in the Abstract, Introduction, and Section 5.
  2. [§4.5, proof of Corollary 4.27] The final step of the proof, in which the coefficient r_n is set to zero, is too terse. The displayed identity equates a polynomial to (r_n z)/(r A(z)) Φ_n(z); to conclude r_n=0 one must argue that A(z)=(z-r)(z-1/r) has exactly one zero outside the unit disk, that the other zero lies inside, that z=0 is not a zero of A, and that all zeros of Φ_n lie inside the unit disk, so no cancellation with Φ_n(z) can remove the pole at the outside zero unless r_n=0. Please spell out this divisibility argument explicitly, since this step is needed for the claimed homogeneous linear second-order equation in Corollary 4.27.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'a weight function that satisfy a Pearson-type differential equation' should read 'that satisfies'; also consider mentioning the boundary condition in the Abstract to avoid the scope overstatement noted above.
  2. [§4.2, display for ℓ_{n,n-1}] The displayed formula for ℓ_{n,n-1} contains the term α_{n−1}α_n − α_{n−1}α_n, which cancels identically; this is likely a typographical error, and the intended expression involving complex conjugates should be corrected.
  3. [§4.1, proof of Corollary 4.3] The phrase 'From Proposition 4.2 and (4.11) of [4]' is ambiguous because the current paper has no Proposition 4.2; please cite the result as 'Proposition 4.2 of [4]' or restate the needed identity.
  4. [§4.4.1] The text contains the typo 'discrete Painvel´ e equation' where 'Painlevé' is intended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: structure relations and differential equations are derived from the Pearson equation and orthogonality, with the boundary hypothesis stated explicitly rather than smuggled in.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 2.1 starts from the Pearson identity (1.5); equation (2.1) is an integration-by-parts consequence, and equation (2.2) uses the stated hypothesis A(1)[w(2π)-w(0)] = 0 together with orthogonality to eliminate the intermediate expansion coefficients s_{n,k}. The coefficients s_{n,n-1}, s_{n,n}, s_{n,n+1}, p_{n,n}, t_{n,n} are then computed by taking inner products, not assumed, as shown in the proof of Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.3 follows by evaluating the structure relation at z = 0. The first-order differential equations in Theorem 3.1 are obtained from Theorem 2.1 by applying Szegő's recurrences and the z ↔ 1/z conjugation—again pure algebra. The second-order equations (Theorems 3.6, 3.8 and their corollaries) are literal derivatives and eliminations of the first-order system. No parameter is fitted and no target equation is used as an input. The applications verify (1.5) and the boundary condition, then specialize the general formulas; simplifications such as |b+n|^2|α_{n-1}|^2 − |b|^2 = 0 use known closed forms for the Verblunsky coefficients and are external checks, not the derivation's premise. Citations to the authors' previous paper [4] occur for comparison and for one technical difference equation used in Example 5 (Lemma 4.26), but this is not the load-bearing argument: the main structure and differential equations do not reduce to [4]. The skeptical observation that A(1)[w(2π)-w(0)] = 0 is not automatic (e.g., w = e^{-ηθ}) is a scope limitation, since the theorems state this condition explicitly; it does not make the derivation circular. Verdict: no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; A, B, and the weight parameters are structural inputs. The derivations rely on standard OPUC facts, the semiclassical Pearson assumption, the boundary condition A(1)[w(2pi)-w(0)]=0, and several cited explicit identities for the examples.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Existence and standard properties of monic orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle, including the Szegő recurrences (1.3).
    Invoked throughout; standard theory, see Simon [25].
  • domain assumption The weight w is positive and satisfies the Pearson equation (1.5) with A,B polynomials of degree at most three, with A(e^{i theta})=0 at singular points.
    Defines the class under study; stated in Section 1.
  • domain assumption Boundary condition A(1)[w(2pi)-w(0)] = 0.
    Required for identity (2.2) and Theorem 2.1; stated before Theorem 2.1.
  • standard math All zeros of Phi_n lie inside the unit disk.
    Used in the proof of Corollary 4.27 to conclude that r_n = 0; standard fact for OPUC.
  • domain assumption Several explicit identities for the examples are taken from prior literature, including |b+n|^2|alpha_{n-1}|^2 - |b|^2 = 0 from [4] and explicit Verblunsky coefficients from [26] and [24].
    Used to simplify second order equations in Sections 4.1 and 4.2; these are cited results, some from the authors' own earlier paper [4].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Differential equations for a class of semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2QQKDTBV

@misc{pith2026250603432,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Differential equations for a class of semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2QQKDTBV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03432}
}
read the original abstract

We consider semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle associated with a weight function that satisfy a Pearson-type differential equation involving two polynomials of degree at most three. Structure relations and difference equations for these orthogonal polynomials are found, and, as a consequence, explicit first and second order differential equations are derived. Among the applications, differential equations for a family of polynomials that generalizes the Jacobi polynomials on the unit circle and the modified Bessel polynomials are established. It is also shown that in some cases the Verblunsky coefficients satisfy a discrete Painlev\'e II equation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03432 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Ifd= 3 we obtain ⟨A(z)Φ′ n, zk⟩=−iΦ n(1)A(1)[w(2π)−w(0)], k= 2,

    ford= 2. Ifd= 3 we obtain ⟨A(z)Φ′ n, zk⟩=−iΦ n(1)A(1)[w(2π)−w(0)], k= 2, . . . , n−2.(2.2) This is the basic relation to establish a structure relation for MOPUC in Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.1.Letwbe a weight function for which(1.5)holds withA(z)andB(z)as in(1.6). IfA(1)[w(2π)−w(0)] = 0then the associated monic orthogonal polynomials satisfy the structure re...

    work page

  2. [1]

    Differential equations for a class of semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle

    Introduction Letµbe a positive measure on the unit circleT={z∈C:|z|= 1}, parametrized byz=e iθ, and let{Φ n}n∈N be the sequence ofmonic orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle(MOPUC) satisfying the orthogonality condition⟨Φ n,Φ m⟩=κ −2 n δm,n,m, n∈Z + ={0,1,2, . . .}, where ⟨f, g⟩= Z 2π 0 f(e iθ)g(eiθ)dµ(eiθ) (1.1) is the standard inner product onT, see...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [2]

    Structure relations for the MOPUC in the class(p, q)withp, q⩽3 LetA(z) eB(z) be (complex) polynomials of degree at mostd⩾1 andwbe such that (1.5) holds. A straightforward use of integration properties and (1.5) imply that ⟨A(z)Φ′ n, zk⟩=⟨[iB(z) + (k+ 1)A(z)]Φ n, zk+1⟩ −iΦn(1)A(1)[w(2π)−w(0)].(2.1) This type of property was explored in [20] whenw(2π) =w(0)...

    work page

  4. [3]

    reversed version

    Differential equations for the MOPUC In this section we establish first and second order differential equations for the class of orthogonal polynomials Φn on the unit circle under study. These equations follow as consequence of the general structure relation presented in Theorem 2.1. Theorem 3.1.If the weight functionwsatisfy(1.5)withA(z)andB(z)as in(1.6)...

    work page

  5. [5]

    As a consequence, we obtained difference equations for the Verblunsky coefficients

    Final remarks and numerical simulations In this work we provided explicit first and second order differential equations for semiclassical MOPUC belonging to the class (p, q), withp⩽3 andq⩽3. As a consequence, we obtained difference equations for the Verblunsky coefficients. It is noteworthy that the Verblunsky co- efficients are explicitly known only for ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Branquinho and M.N

    A. Branquinho and M.N. Rebocho. On differential equations for orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle.J. Math. Anal. Appl., 356(1):242–256, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Specifically, we consider and generalize some of the weight functions that were characterized in [4] to illustrate applications of Theorems 3.1, 3.6, and Corollary 3.7

    Applications In this section we present concrete examples of first and second order differential equations for several semiclassical weight functions. Specifically, we consider and generalize some of the weight functions that were characterized in [4] to illustrate applications of Theorems 3.1, 3.6, and Corollary 3.7. 4.1. Example 1 Let us consider first ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Before we proceed to the second order differential equations, the following technical result is useful to express the coefficients of the equation in a more compact form

    +iu] αnz+ (rn+ iu)αn−1,rW n(z) =z{( rn+iu)α n−1z−[r(n+ 1) + iu]αn}andrY n(z) = z[iuz−r ℓn+1,n −(rn+ iu)αnαn−1]. Before we proceed to the second order differential equations, the following technical result is useful to express the coefficients of the equation in a more compact form. Lemma 4.26.The following identities hold, (a)Im[ rℓn,n−1 + [(n+ 1) r+iu] α...

    work page

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Chouteau and S

    T. Chouteau and S. Tarricone. Recursion relation for Toeplitz determinants and the discrete Painlev´ e II hierarchy.SIGMA, 19:030, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Alfaro and F

    M. Alfaro and F. Marcell´ an. Recent trends in orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. In C. Brezin- ski, L. Gori, and A. Ronveaux, editors,Orthogonal Polynomials and their Applications, Proceedings 22 Erice 1990, volume 9 ofIMACS Ann. Comput. Appl. Math., pages 3–14. Baltz...

    1990

  3. [11]

    V.M. Badkov. Systems of orthogonal polynomials expressed in explicit form in terms of Jacobi polynomials.Math. Notes, 42(5):650–659, 1987. English translation: Math. Notes 42 (1987), no. 5-6, 858–863

    1987

  4. [12]

    Bonan, D.S

    S. Bonan, D.S. Lubinsky, and P. Nevai. Orthogonal polynomials and their derivatives, II.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 18(4):1163–1176, 1987

    1987

  5. [13]

    Bracciali, K.S

    C.F. Bracciali, K.S. Rampazzi, and L.L. Silva Ribeiro. On semi-classical weight functions on the unit circle.J. Approx. Theory, 295:105957, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Branquinho, A

    A. Branquinho, A. Foulqui´ e-Moreno, and K. Rampazzi. Semiclassical orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle: A Riemann-Hilbert perspective, 2024. arXiv:2406.07290

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ismail.Classical and Quantum Orthogonal Polynomials in One Variable, volume 98 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications

    M.E.H. Ismail.Classical and Quantum Orthogonal Polynomials in One Variable, volume 98 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    and [6], and the equations are explicitly given in terms of the polynomialsA(z),B(z), and the coefficientsℓ n,k defined in (1.2). Furthermore, our results are used to find difference equations for the Verblunsky coefficients, including the discrete Painlev´ e II equation αn +α...

  9. [17]

    Branquinho and M.N

    A. Branquinho and M.N. Rebocho. Structure relations for orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Linear Algebra Appl., 436:4296–4310, 2012

    2012

  10. [18]

    Cachafeiro and C

    A. Cachafeiro and C. Su´ arez. About semiclassical polynomials on the unit circle corresponding to the class (2,2).J. Comput. Appl. Math., 85:123–144, 1997

    1997

  11. [19]

    Costa, H.M

    M.S. Costa, H.M. Felix, and A. Sri Ranga. Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle and chain sequences.J. Approx. Theory, 173:14–32, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    de Jesus and J

    M.N. de Jesus and J. Petronilho. On linearly related sequences of derivatives of orthogonal polyno- mials.J. Math. Anal. Appl., 347(2):482–492, 2008

    2008

  13. [21]

    Filipuk and W

    G. Filipuk and W. Van Assche. Discrete orthogonal polynomials with hypergeometric weights and Painlev´ e VI.SIGMA, 14:088, 2018. Contribution to the Special Issue on Painlev´ e Equations and Applications in Memory of Andrei Kapaev

    2018

  14. [22]

    Fokas, A.R

    A.S. Fokas, A.R. Its, and A.V. Kitaev. Discrete Painlev´ e equations and their appearance in quantum gravity.Commun. Math. Phys., 142:313–344, 1991

    1991

  15. [23]

    Iserles, P

    A. Iserles, P. Koch, S. Nørsett, and J.M. Sanz-Serna. On polynomials orthogonal with respect to certain Sobolev inner products.J. Approx. Theory, 65(2):151–175, 1991

    1991

  16. [24]

    Further results involving orthogonal polynomials and Painlev´ e equations (continuous and discrete) can be found for instance in [12, 18, 19, 28] and references therein

    in connection to modified Bessel polynomials [16, 28]. Further results involving orthogonal polynomials and Painlev´ e equations (continuous and discrete) can be found for instance in [12, 18, 19, 28] and references therein. Discrete Painlev´ e equations are also found in quan...

  17. [25]

    Ismail and N.S

    M.E.H. Ismail and N.S. Witte. Discriminants and functional equations for polynomials orthogonal on the unit circle.J. Approx. Theory, 110(2):200–228, 2001

    2001

  18. [26]

    Jones, O

    W.B. Jones, O. Nj ˚ astad, and W.J. Thron. Moment theory, orthogonal polynomials, quadrature, and continued fractions associated with the unit circle.Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 21(2):113–152, 1989

    1989

  19. [27]

    A.P. Magnus. Painlev´ e-type differential equations for the recurrence coefficients of semi-classical orthogonal polynomials.J. Comput. Appl. Math., 57(1):215–237, 1995. Proceeding of the Fourth International Symposium on Orthogonal Polynomials and their Applications

    1995

  20. [28]

    A.P. Magnus. Freud’s equations for orthogonal polynomials as discrete Painlev´ e equations. In Peter A. Clarkson and Frank W. Nijhoff, editors,Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equa- tions, volume 255 ofLondon Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, pages 228–243. C...

    1999

  21. [29]

    A.P. Magnus. MAPA 3072A Special Topics in Approximation Theory: Semi-Classical Orthogo- nal Polynomials on the Unit Circle, 2013. Available in:http://perso.uclouvain.be/alphonse. magnus

    2013

  22. [30]

    Marcell´ an and R

    F. Marcell´ an and R. Sfaxi. Second structure relation for semiclassical orthogonal polynomials.J. Comput. Appl. Math., 200(2):537–554, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    Marcell´ an and A

    F. Marcell´ an and A. Sri Ranga. Sobolev orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle and coherent pairs of measures of the second kind.Results Math., 71(3):1127–1149, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    P. Maroni. Une th´ eorie alg´ ebrique des polynˆ omes orthogonaux. Application aux polynˆ omes orthog- onaux semiclassiques. In C. Brezinski, L. Gori, and A. Ronveaux, editors,Orthogonal Polynomials and Their Applications, Proceedings Erice 1990, volume 9 ofIMACS Ann. Comput. ...

    1990

  25. [33]

    Periwal and D

    V. Periwal and D. Shevitz. Unitary-matrix models as exactly solvable string theories.Phys. Rev. Lett., 64(11):1326–1329, 1990

    1990

  26. [34]

    Simon.Orthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle

    B. Simon.Orthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle. Part 1. Classical Theory, volume 54, Part 1 ofAmerican Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, 23 Providence, RI, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    Szeg˝ o polynomials from hypergeometric functions.Proc

    A Sri Ranga. Szeg˝ o polynomials from hypergeometric functions.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 138:4259–4270, 2010

    2010

  28. [36]

    Su´ arez

    C. Su´ arez. About semiclassical orthogonal polynomials of the class (2,2).J. Comput. Appl. Math., 131:457–472, 2001

    2001

  29. [37]

    Van Assche.Orthogonal Polynomials and Painlev´ e Equations, volume 27 ofAustralian Mathe- matical Society Lecture Series

    W. Van Assche.Orthogonal Polynomials and Painlev´ e Equations, volume 27 ofAustralian Mathe- matical Society Lecture Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.