Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Time-Domain Excitation of Finite-Lifetime Resonances and Their Exceptional Points

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Driving a passive resonator with a complex-frequency waveform that decays like $t^m e^{i\omega_r t - \Gamma t}$ makes its response grow as $t^{m+1}$, and quadratically at exceptional points.

desk verdict A correct single-pole result with a clean RLC demonstration, wrapped in an overstated universality claim; referee it, but require the missing derivations and modal background bounds. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03485 v2 pith:YH42HNHZ submitted 2025-06-04 physics.optics

Asaf Farhi , Dror Hershkovitz , Andrea Alu , Haim Suchowski This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords complex-frequencyexcitationpassiveresonatorsexceptionalpointstime-domainresponseRLCcircuitsubwavelengthparticlesresonancepolespowertransferefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Passive resonators—lossy systems with no gain—normally respond to a steady drive by decaying. This paper claims that when the drive itself decays at the resonator's complex resonance frequency $\omega_r + i\Gamma$, the response grows while the drive lasts: an input envelope $t^m$ comes out as $t^{m+1}$, and at an exceptional point, where two resonance poles merge, a simple exponential input produces $t^2$ growth. The effect follows from the pole structure of the response function and applies to both subwavelength optical particles and lumped-element circuits. The paper derives closed-form expressions for both systems and verifies the $t$ and $t^2$ envelopes experimentally in RLC circuits, where complex-frequency excitation also delivers more power to the load than continuous-wave driving.

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex-frequency pole of the resonator's linear response function, located at $\omega_1 = \omega_r + i\Gamma$ in the Fourier domain. The argument works by inverse Fourier transforming a response with this pole, driven by an input whose spectrum contains a matching pole; the residue theorem yields a polynomial factor $t$ multiplying the decaying oscillation, or $t^2$ for a double pole. For subwavelength particles, the quasistatic eigenfunction expansion expresses the scattered field as a sum over poles, and near resonance a single dipole pole dominates; for the RLC circuit the impedance has exactly one such pole pair. An exceptional point is a non-Hermitian degeneracy where two resonance poles coalesce into one double pole.

What would settle it

Drive a series RLC circuit (for example $Q=100$, $\omega_r/2\pi \approx 164$ kHz, $\Gamma/2\pi \approx 1.59$ kHz) with $V_{\mathrm{in}} = \sin(\omega_r t) e^{-\Gamma t}$ and record the resistor voltage for $0 < t < 1/\Gamma$; the envelope must be proportional to $t$ within experimental noise. A deviation—saturation, a delay of more than a few cycles, or a non-monotonic envelope—would falsify the single-pole claim. The exceptional-point version requires a quadratic envelope for an exponential input when the two poles coincide.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Near a complex resonance pole at $\omega_1 = \omega_r + i\Gamma$, a passive resonator driven by $\theta(t) t^m e^{i\omega_r t - \Gamma t}$ responds approximately as $t^{m+1} e^{i\omega_r t - \Gamma t}$ for $t \gtrsim 1/\omega_r$ and $t \ll 1/\Gamma$. For $m=0$ the scattered field or circuit current rises linearly in time before decaying, so over short times the passive system behaves like an active resonator with effectively real-frequency oscillation. At a second-order complex-frequency exceptional point, where two poles coalesce, the same exponential input produces $t^2$ growth. The paper obtains these results by inverse Fourier transforming the response of a subwavelength dipole particle and of a series RLC circuit, and confirms the scaling experimentally in circuits with $Q=100$ and theoretically for $Q=1000$.

Load-bearing premise

The scaling argument rests entirely on the response being dominated by a single complex pole—one dipole eigenmode for a particle, the RLC pole for a circuit—and the paper does not quantify how much non-resonant background or higher-order modes contribute over the observation window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Complex-frequency excitation gives passive resonators a finite-time window of rising response, effectively providing transient gain-like behavior without gain media.
  • At complex-frequency exceptional points the envelope grows as $t^2$, offering a stronger transient response and an enhanced power delivery mechanism.
  • Because the argument is purely algebraic in the pole position, it should extend to any linear passive resonator dominated by one complex pole, including acoustic, mechanical, and matter-wave systems.
  • Inputs with higher envelope order $t^m$ produce output order $t^{m+1}$, giving a deterministic rule for shaping output waveform envelopes.
  • Measured power and energy transfer to the load exceed continuous-wave excitation at the same real frequency, with the advantage persisting for $Q=1000$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-pole approximation holds, the same resonator acts as a temporal integrator of order $m+1$ on the envelope, and an exceptional point acts as a second-order integrator, which could be exploited for analog signal processing.
  • Because the growth window is limited to $t \ll 1/\Gamma$, there should be an optimal drive duration around a few decay times that maximizes delivered energy; the paper does not optimize this trade-off.
  • The power-efficiency advantage suggests a testable prediction for infrared phonon-polariton nanoparticles: complex-frequency excitation should outperform continuous-wave excitation for local heating or sensing.
  • The exceptional-point enhancement implies that tuning a circuit or cavity to an EP could amplify weak signals within a finite time window, an avenue relevant to sensing that the paper does not pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies time-domain excitation of passive resonators by complex-frequency waveforms. For a resonator whose response is dominated by a single complex pole at ω_r + iΓ, it claims that an input of the form t^m e^{iω_r t - Γt} produces an output approximately proportional to t^{m+1} e^{iω_r t - Γt}, and that at a complex-frequency exceptional point (a double pole) a simple exponential input produces a t^2 envelope. The theory is applied analytically to a subwavelength silver particle and verified experimentally in series and degenerate RLC circuits, with reported excellent agreement. The paper also claims superior power-transfer efficiency for complex-frequency excitation over conventional continuous-wave excitation.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper identifies a genuine and non-obvious mechanism: a passive, lossy resonator can exhibit a growing response envelope when driven by a suitably decaying input, and the growth order increases at exceptional points. The isolated-pole calculation is elementary but the consequences for subwavelength scatterers and the EP enhancement are potentially interesting. The RLC experiments provide a clean verification because the series RLC transfer function is exactly second order, and the reported waveforms visually match the predicted t and t^2 envelopes. The power-efficiency observation, if quantitatively confirmed, has practical relevance. However, the universality claim and the EP derivation are currently asserted rather than demonstrated, so the significance of the paper as written is below its apparent ambition.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (1)-(2), Fig. 2] The reduction of the eigenmode sum in Eq. (1) to a single dipole pole in Eq. (2) is not quantified. The text states that 'near a resonance, one complex pole dominates' and that 'mainly the dipole mode interacts' with the incoming field, but no estimate is given for the contribution of higher-order modes or the non-resonant background. For the R=40 nm silver particle with k a ≈ 1, these contributions are not obviously negligible, and they matter most at early times because the t e^{s_p t} term in Eq. (2) vanishes at t=0 while the observation window in Fig. 2 extends only to t<1/(3Γ). Since the t^{m+1} scaling is a property of an isolated pole, the paper's central claim of universality for 'general resonators' requires either a quantitative bound on the neglected terms or an explicit statement of the class of systems for which the single-pole assumption is controlled. The abstract's phrase 'extended to higher-order modes' is not supported by any derivation in the main text or the Supplementary Material.
  2. [Section 'As for the complex-resonance exceptional point...' and Supplementary Material] The t^2 response at the exceptional point is asserted rather than derived. The main text reports that 'we proceeded similarly by performing inverse Fourier Transform' and obtained I(t) ∝ t^2 e^{-iω_r t - Γt}, but no expression for the inverse transform is given. The Supplementary Material provides the fourth-order impedance polynomial and states that it 'can exhibit a double complex pole for a specific set of parameters' without giving those parameters, the double-pole condition, or the resulting time-domain expression. Since the t^2 scaling is the central new EP claim and requires a genuine second-order pole in the transfer function, the paper should supply the explicit Laurent expansion of 1/Z_T near the double pole, the parameter values used for Figs. 3(g) and 4(g), and the closed-form I(t).
  3. [Figs. 3 and 4, 'power efficiency' paragraph] The experimental validation and the power-efficiency comparison are only qualitative: the figures show no error bars, no goodness-of-fit metric for the t and t^2 envelope fits, and no numerical efficiency ratios. The abstract and conclusion claim 'superior power efficiency' but this is supported only by visual comparison of P_out/P_in and E_out/E_in curves. Quantitative values with uncertainties are needed to support the experimental claims and the claimed efficiency advantage.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3) and Fig. 3] The stated component values are internally inconsistent: with R=18 Ω, L=1 mH, and C=0.94 nF, Eq. (3) gives Γ=R/(2L)=9×10^3 s^-1, whereas the text and Fig. 3 state Γ=2π×1591.55≈10^4 s^-1; please reconcile the values or explain the discrepancy.
  2. [Introduction] There are duplicated words in the introduction: 'many types of of systems' and 'across across a variety of fields'.
  3. [Introduction] The phrase 'for t≪Γ' should read 'for t≪1/Γ'; the correct condition appears later in the paper.
  4. [Fig. 2 and Eq. (2)] The proportionality factor in Eq. (2) is not defined; please state the omitted modal overlap factor and the normalization so that a reader can reproduce the Fig. 2 curves.
  5. [Experiment, Fig. 3] The adjustment of the applied input decay rate to compensate for impedance mismatch is described only in passing; please provide the adjusted value and the criterion used to choose it so that the experiment is reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the t and t^2 envelope predictions follow from explicit inverse Fourier transforms of pole terms with no fitted parameters or self-citation chain.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. For the subwavelength particle, Eq. (1) gives a spectral expansion of the scattered field, and after assuming a single dipole pole dominates, Eq. (2) is obtained by a direct inverse Fourier transform. The resulting te^{-(Γ+iωr)t} envelope is a mathematical consequence of the pole structure, not a quantity fitted to the measured output. The RLC-circuit result in Eq. (4) is exact for the stated lumped-element denominator and follows from the same inverse-transform argument. The exceptional-point result, obtained by inverse transforming a second-order pole, is likewise a direct residue calculation, not an imported or fitted result. The experimental input adjustment described in Fig. 3 (adjusting the applied voltage to obtain the intended measured input) is calibration of the independent drive, not fitting of the predicted output. Self-citations (Refs. [15], [30], [38], [39]) provide background on active-resonator dynamics and exceptional-point circuits, but the paper's core claim does not depend on their validity; the t^{m+1} scaling is derived from the system transfer function in the paper itself. The unquantified single-pole dominance assumption is a correctness risk about higher-order modes, not a circularity: it is an explicit physical approximation, and for the RLC circuit the pole model is exact. No reduction of a prediction to an input or to a self-citation chain is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theory is parameter-free given the material or circuit parameters; the only hand-tuned quantity is the experimental input decay-rate adjustment. The central claim rests on the single-pole approximation and on the standard Laplace-transform property that a pole driven at its own location yields secular growth.

free parameters (1)
  • Applied input decay-rate adjustment = slower than nominal Γ (value not specified)
    To compensate for impedance mismatch, the authors applied an input voltage with a slower decay rate so that the measured input voltage matched the intended complex-frequency waveform; this hand-tuned parameter affects the experiment-theory comparison.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The subwavelength particle is described accurately by the quasistatic eigenmode expansion with a Drude permittivity (Eq. (1)).
    This is standard for deeply subwavelength particles, but it is an approximation; the paper does not test its validity for the specific silver sphere parameters used in Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption A single complex pole dominates the response near resonance; all other eigenmodes and the non-resonant background are negligible.
    Eq. (2) is derived from the dipole-mode contribution only; the t^{m+1} scaling is a property of an isolated pole and would be modified if other poles contribute.
  • standard math The input waveform is a causal signal starting at t=0 and the inverse Fourier transform is taken with the standard convention.
    This is stated implicitly via the θ(t) factor in Eqs. (2) and (4).
  • ad hoc to paper The SM circuit with one RLC branch in series with two parallel RLC branches can be tuned to exhibit an exact double complex pole, and the paper's claim of t^2 response follows from that degeneracy.
    The SM shows the 4th-order polynomial but does not give the specific component values or a pole-zero plot confirming the double pole; the t^2 result is asserted, not derived in detail.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-Domain Excitation of Finite-Lifetime Resonances and Their Exceptional Points." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YH42HNHZ

@misc{pith2026250603485,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-Domain Excitation of Finite-Lifetime Resonances and Their Exceptional Points},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YH42HNHZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03485}
}
abstract

Resonances associated with complex-frequency poles are ubiquitous across physics and can arise in any open system, ranging from subwavelength particles and cavities to biological structures. When two such resonances coalesce, they form exceptional points (EPs), non-Hermitian singularities known to produce unusual spectral and dynamical behavior. However, the dynamics of the response of such resonances and exceptional points to complex frequency drive remained largely unexplored. Here, we experimentally observe the temporal response of complex-frequency resonances and theoretically study this for exceptional points. We unveil a universal transient phenomenon of open cavities driven at complex frequencies: the system's initial response grows linearly, with enhanced growth at exceptional points (EPs), even though the system is passive and the excitation decays. Closed-form theory for general resonators, extended to higher-order modes, predicts efficient power transfer with $t$ and $t^2$ scaling for complex single poles and exceptional points (EPs), respectively, at all times. We demonstrate these effects in subwavelength optical scatterers and experimentally in an electrical circuit analogue, with excellent agreement, and explore configurations that capture EP-enhanced growth.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03485 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Types of passive resonators (without gain) and their temporal response to resonant complex-frequency excitations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The response of a subwavelength silver particle with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Theoretical and experimental results for complex-frequency excitations of an electric RLC circuit and an electric circuit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Analytical results for complex-frequency excitations of an electric RLC circuit and an electric circuit with an exceptional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shaping Ultrafast Pulses for Enhanced Resonant Nonlinear Interactions

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Arctangent-shaped ultrafast pulses enhance resonant four-wave mixing in gold nanobars through two mechanisms, phase compensation and antisymmetric polarization response, with predicted exponential gains at high harmon...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Eigenstate expan- sion of the quasistatic electric field of a point charge in a spherical inclusion structure.Physical Review A, 96(4): 043806, 2017

    Asaf Farhi and David J Bergman. Eigenstate expan- sion of the quasistatic electric field of a point charge in a spherical inclusion structure.Physical Review A, 96(4): 043806, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Coher- ent perfect absorption of nonlinear matter waves.Science Advances, 4(8):eaat6539, 2018

    Andreas M¨ ullers, Bodhaditya Santra, Christian Baals, Jian Jiang, Jens Benary, Ralf Labouvie, Dmitry A Zezyulin, Vladimir V Konotop, and Herwig Ott. Coher- ent perfect absorption of nonlinear matter waves.Science Advances, 4(8):eaat6539, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Dielectric constant of a two- component granular composite: A practical scheme for calculating the pole spectrum.Physical Review B, 19(4): 2359, 1979

    David J Bergman. Dielectric constant of a two- component granular composite: A practical scheme for calculating the pole spectrum.Physical Review B, 19(4): 2359, 1979

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Phonon- enhanced light–matter interaction at the nanometre scale.Nature, 418(6894):159–162, 2002

    R Hillenbrand, T Taubner, and F Keilmann. Phonon- enhanced light–matter interaction at the nanometre scale.Nature, 418(6894):159–162, 2002

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Localized Resonant Phonon Polaritons in Biaxial Nanoparticles

    Daniel Beitner, Asaf Farhi, Ravindra Kumar Nithar- wal, Tejendra Dixit, Tzvia Beitner, Shachar Richter, SivaRama Krishnan, and Haim Suchowski. Localized res- onant phonon polaritons in biaxial nanoparticles.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09669, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Shaping exci- ton dynamics in 2d semiconductors by tailored ultrafast pulses.Light: Science and Applications, 14, 80, 2025

    Omri Meron, Uri Arieli, Eyal Bahar, Swarup Deb, Moshe Ben Shalom, and Haim Suchowski. Shaping exci- ton dynamics in 2d semiconductors by tailored ultrafast pulses.Light: Science and Applications, 14, 80, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Observation of co- herent delocalized phonon-like modes in dna under phys- iological conditions.Nature communications, 7(1):11799, 2016

    Mario Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, Gopakumar Ramakrishnan, Thomas Harwood, Adrian J Lapthorn, Sharon M Kelly, Elizabeth M Ellis, and Klaas Wynne. Observation of co- herent delocalized phonon-like modes in dna under phys- iological conditions.Nature communications, 7(1):11799, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Three-dimensional-subwavelength field local- ization, time reversal of sources, and infinite, asymptotic degeneracy in spherical structures.Physical Review A, 101(6):063818, 2020

    Asaf Farhi. Three-dimensional-subwavelength field local- ization, time reversal of sources, and infinite, asymptotic degeneracy in spherical structures.Physical Review A, 101(6):063818, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Micro- spheres with atomic-scale tolerances generate hyperde- generacy.Physical Review X, 10(3):031049, 2020

    Jacob Kher-Alden, Shai Maayani, Leopoldo L Martin, Mark Douvidzon, Lev Deych, and Tal Carmon. Micro- spheres with atomic-scale tolerances generate hyperde- generacy.Physical Review X, 10(3):031049, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Beyond bounds on light scattering with com- 6 plex frequency excitations.Physical Review Letters, 129 (20):203601, 2022

    Seunghwi Kim, Sergey Lepeshov, Alex Krasnok, and An- drea Al` u. Beyond bounds on light scattering with com- 6 plex frequency excitations.Physical Review Letters, 129 (20):203601, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Loss compensation and superresolution in metama- terials with excitations at complex frequencies.Physical Review X, 13(4):041024, 2023

    Seunghwi Kim, Yu-Gui Peng, Simon Yves, and Andrea Al` u. Loss compensation and superresolution in metama- terials with excitations at complex frequencies.Physical Review X, 13(4):041024, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Compensating losses in polariton propagation with synthesized complex frequency excitation.Nature Materials, 23(4):506–511, 2024

    Fuxin Guan, Xiangdong Guo, Shu Zhang, Kebo Zeng, Yue Hu, Chenchen Wu, Shaobo Zhou, Yuanjiang Xi- ang, Xiaoxia Yang, Qing Dai, et al. Compensating losses in polariton propagation with synthesized complex frequency excitation.Nature Materials, 23(4):506–511, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Overcoming losses in superlenses with synthetic waves of complex frequency

    Fuxin Guan, Xiangdong Guo, Kebo Zeng, Shu Zhang, Zhaoyu Nie, Shaojie Ma, Qing Dai, John Pendry, Xi- ang Zhang, and Shuang Zhang. Overcoming losses in superlenses with synthetic waves of complex frequency. Science, 381(6659):766–771, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Complex-frequency excitations in photonics and wave physics.Science, 387(6741):eado4128, 2025

    Seunghwi Kim, Alex Krasnok, and Andrea Al` u. Complex-frequency excitations in photonics and wave physics.Science, 387(6741):eado4128, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Generating and processing optical waveforms using spec- tral singularities.Physical Review A, 109(1):013512, 2024

    Asaf Farhi, Alexander Cerjan, and A Douglas Stone. Generating and processing optical waveforms using spec- tral singularities.Physical Review A, 109(1):013512, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Photonic temporal integrator for all-optical com- puting.Optics express, 16(22):18202–18214, 2008

    Radan Slav ´ ık, Yongwoo Park, Nicolas Ayotte, Serge Doucet, Tae-Jung Ahn, Sophie LaRochelle, and Jos´ e Aza˜ na. Photonic temporal integrator for all-optical com- puting.Optics express, 16(22):18202–18214, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    On-chip cmos-compatible all-optical in- tegrator.Nature communications, 1(1):29, 2010

    Marcello Ferrera, Yongwoo Park, Luca Razzari, Brent E Little, Sai T Chu, Roberto Morandotti, David J Moss, and Jos´ e Aza˜ na. On-chip cmos-compatible all-optical in- tegrator.Nature communications, 1(1):29, 2010

    2010

  10. [18]

    Nonlinear exceptional-point lasing with ab initio maxwell–bloch theory.APL Photonics, 7(12), 2022

    Mohammed Benzaouia, AD Stone, and Steven G John- son. Nonlinear exceptional-point lasing with ab initio maxwell–bloch theory.APL Photonics, 7(12), 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Rigorous modal analysis of plasmonic nanoresonators.Physical Review B, 97(20):205422, 2018

    Wei Yan, R´ emi Faggiani, and Philippe Lalanne. Rigorous modal analysis of plasmonic nanoresonators.Physical Review B, 97(20):205422, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    From metamate- rials to metadevices.Nature materials, 11(11):917–924, 2012

    Nikolay I Zheludev and Yuri S Kivshar. From metamate- rials to metadevices.Nature materials, 11(11):917–924, 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Spherical hyperlens for two-dimensional sub-diffractional imaging at visible frequencies.Nature communications, 1(1):143, 2010

    Junsuk Rho, Ziliang Ye, Yi Xiong, Xiaobo Yin, Zhaowei Liu, Hyeunseok Choi, Guy Bartal, and Xiang Zhang. Spherical hyperlens for two-dimensional sub-diffractional imaging at visible frequencies.Nature communications, 1(1):143, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Po- laritons in van der waals materials.Science, 354(6309): aag1992, 2016

    DN Basov, MM Fogler, and FJ Garc ´ ıa de Abajo. Po- laritons in van der waals materials.Science, 354(6309): aag1992, 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    Cambridge university press, 2012

    Lukas Novotny and Bert Hecht.Principles of nano- optics. Cambridge university press, 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Unlocking coherent control of ultrafast plas- monic interaction.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 16(7): 2100467, 2022

    Eyal Bahar, Uri Arieli, Maayan Vizner Stern, and Haim Suchowski. Unlocking coherent control of ultrafast plas- monic interaction.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 16(7): 2100467, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    A newcomer’s guide to ultrashort pulse shap- ing and characterization.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 43(10):103001, 2010

    Antoine Monmayrant, S´ ebastien Weber, and B´ eatrice Chatel. A newcomer’s guide to ultrashort pulse shap- ing and characterization.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 43(10):103001, 2010

    2010

  18. [26]

    Coherent quan- tum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse.Nature, 396(6708):239–242, 1998

    Doron Meshulach and Yaron Silberberg. Coherent quan- tum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse.Nature, 396(6708):239–242, 1998

    1998

  19. [27]

    Generation of impossible cross-peaks between bulk water and biomolecules in so- lution nmr.Science, 262(5142):2005–2009, 1993

    Warren S Warren, Wolfgang Richter, Amy Hamilton An- dreotti, and Bennett T Farmer. Generation of impossible cross-peaks between bulk water and biomolecules in so- lution nmr.Science, 262(5142):2005–2009, 1993

    2005

  20. [28]

    Femtosecond pulse shaping using spa- tial light modulators.Review of scientific instruments, 71 (5):1929–1960, 2000

    Andrew M Weiner. Femtosecond pulse shaping using spa- tial light modulators.Review of scientific instruments, 71 (5):1929–1960, 2000

    1929

  21. [29]

    Time-reversed lasing and in- terferometric control of absorption.Science, 331(6019): 889–892, 2011

    Wenjie Wan, Yidong Chong, Li Ge, Heeso Noh, A Dou- glas Stone, and Hui Cao. Time-reversed lasing and in- terferometric control of absorption.Science, 331(6019): 889–892, 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Excitation of absorbing exceptional points in the time domain.Physical Review A, 106(3):L031503, 2022

    Asaf Farhi, Ahmed Mekawy, Andrea Al` u, and Douglas Stone. Excitation of absorbing exceptional points in the time domain.Physical Review A, 106(3):L031503, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(24):10152–10157, 2007

    Eilon D Kirson, Vladim ´ ır Dbal` y, Frantiˇ sek Tovaryˇ s, Josef Vymazal, Jean F Soustiel, Aviran Itzhaki, Daniel Morde- chovich, Shirley Steinberg-Shapira, Zoya Gurvich, Rosa Schneiderman, et al. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models an...

    2007

  24. [32]

    Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances

    Andre Kurs, Aristeidis Karalis, Robert Moffatt, John D Joannopoulos, Peter Fisher, and Marin Soljacic. Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances. science, 317(5834):83–86, 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature Materials, 23(4):499– 505, 2024

    Hanan Herzig Sheinfux, Lorenzo Orsini, Minwoo Jung, Iacopo Torre, Matteo Ceccanti, Simone Marconi, Rinu Maniyara, David Barcons Ruiz, Alexander H¨ otger, Ri- cardo Bertini, et al. High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal bo...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Quasi-electrostatic eigenmode analysis of anisotropic particles.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03378, 2024

    Asaf Farhi and Haim Suchowski. Quasi-electrostatic eigenmode analysis of anisotropic particles.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03378, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Real spectra in non-hermitian hamiltonians having p t symmetry.Phys- ical review letters, 80(24):5243, 1998

    Carl M Bender and Stefan Boettcher. Real spectra in non-hermitian hamiltonians having p t symmetry.Phys- ical review letters, 80(24):5243, 1998

    1998

  28. [36]

    Zhicheng Xiao, Huanan Li, Tsampikos Kottos, and An- drea Al` u. Enhanced sensing and nondegraded thermal noise performance based on pt-symmetric electronic cir- cuits with a sixth-order exceptional point.Physical Re- view Letters, 123(21):213901, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Spawning rings of exceptional points out of dirac cones.Nature, 525(7569): 354–358, 2015

    Bo Zhen, Chia Wei Hsu, Yuichi Igarashi, Ling Lu, Ido Kaminer, Adi Pick, Song-Liang Chua, John D Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Spawning rings of exceptional points out of dirac cones.Nature, 525(7569): 354–358, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    Efficient general waveform catching by a cavity at an absorbing exceptional point.Physical Review A, 109(4):L041502, 2024

    Asaf Farhi, Wei Dai, Seunghwi Kim, Andrea Alu, and Douglas Stone. Efficient general waveform catching by a cavity at an absorbing exceptional point.Physical Review A, 109(4):L041502, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    −ω2L3C3 + 1 +R 3jωC 3 C3 + −ω2L1C1 + 1 +R 1jωC 1 −ω2L2C2 + 1 +R 2jωC 2 C1 (−ω2L2C2 + 1 +R 2jωC 2) +C 2 (−ω2L1C1 + 1 +R 1jωC 1) # = 1 jωC 3

    Asaf Farhi. Atomic and molecular waveforms processing with subattosecond resolution.submitted, 2025. 7 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL To realize a double complex pole we consider a circuit composed of an RLC branch is series with two RLC branches in parallel. We write the total imp...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.