Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Shaping Ultrafast Pulses for Enhanced Resonant Nonlinear Interactions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An arctangent spectral phase creates two distinct enhancement regimes in resonant nonlinear interactions, and both scale exponentially with harmonic order.

desk verdict Solid experimental phase-space map and a convincing primary compensation mechanism, but the new antisymmetric enhancement is explained with a second-order model while the measurement is third-order—needs direct verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00568 v1 pith:HXQGZVCK submitted 2025-07-01 physics.optics

Omri Meron , Snir Nehemia , Uri Arieli , Haim Suchowski This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords coherentcontrolarctangentspectralphasefour-wavemixingplasmonicnanostructuresanharmonicoscillatorhigh-harmonicgenerationmultiphotoninterferenceultrafastpulseshaping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether resonant multiphoton enhancement by pulse shaping has more than one mechanism. It shows experimentally that scanning an arctangent spectral phase in single-pulse four-wave mixing on gold nanobars produces a four-quadrant landscape with two enhancement regions: one where the phase cancels the resonance-induced dispersion and one where it creates an antisymmetric polarization response. A second-order model explains both regions through group-delay symmetry and constructive multiphoton pathway interference. Simulations of the same mechanism at higher orders predict enhancement factors that rise almost exponentially with harmonic order. If the prediction holds, the method gives a deterministic way to boost high-order harmonic generation in resonant systems without raising peak power.

What carries the argument

The central object is the arctangent spectral phase $\phi_E(\omega)=\tan^{-1}\left(2\Gamma\omega/(\Omega^2-\omega^2)\right)$, whose center $\Omega$ and width $\Gamma$ are scanned over a two-dimensional phase space. The material response is modelled by a Lorentzian anharmonic oscillator (Eq. 2) with a perturbative third-order correction that appears as a three-fold convolution of the linear response (Eq. 4). The key symmetry is the antisymmetric displacement phase $\phi_{x_0}(-\Delta\omega)=-\phi_{x_0}(\Delta\omega)$, which enforces equal group delays for frequency-symmetric photon pairs and produces constructive multiphoton interference; the same model, evaluated to higher order, generates the exponential harmonic-enhancement prediction.

What would settle it

Measure the harmonic enhancement factor versus harmonic order for the same Atan phase on a resonant gold nanostructure and plot it on a log-linear scale; the paper's claim predicts a straight line whose slope grows with resonance quality factor and pulse bandwidth, while any saturation or rollover would show the single-mode perturbative model has broken down. A simpler check is to repeat the 2D FWM phase-space scan and verify that the secondary enhancement quadrant disappears or shifts when the pulse duration is changed so that the antisymmetric group-delay condition is no longer met.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that an arctangent spectral phase on the driving pulse can enhance a resonant nonlinear process in two ways. In one regime the phase is chosen to compensate the material's own resonance phase, compressing the oscillator response toward transform-limited behavior. In the other, counterintuitive regime, the phase adds dispersion, but does so in a way that makes the oscillator displacement phase antisymmetric around the carrier frequency; photon pairs symmetric about that frequency then experience equal group delays, so all two-photon pathways arrive together and interfere constructively. The same classical anharmonic-oscillator model reproduces the measured four-wave-mixing landscape and predicts that both mechanisms give harmonic-order enhancement that grows almost exponentially, exceeding a factor of 58 at the 17th harmonic in simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions rest on treating the gold nanobar as a single Lorentzian anharmonic oscillator whose fitted linewidth $\gamma=0.049$ eV remains valid all the way to the 17th harmonic, with no nonperturbative, thermal, interband, or many-body effects changing the response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-dimensional phase-space map can be used to extract the near-field resonance frequency and homogeneous linewidth of a plasmonic nanostructure, information that linear far-field spectroscopy obscures by inhomogeneous broadening.
  • The same deterministic phase-shaping recipe applies to any resonant system described by classical anharmonic dynamics, including 2D semiconductors, coupled nanoresonators, Fano resonances, and bound states in the continuum.
  • Harmonic enhancement grows with harmonic order, resonance quality factor, and driving pulse bandwidth, so the largest gains are expected precisely in high-order, high-quality-factor resonant systems.
  • Because the antisymmetric regime enhances nonlinear output without increasing peak power, it offers a route to stronger nonlinear signals while avoiding sample damage and other high-intensity effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted exponential scaling transfers to experiments, even modest low-order enhancements would become large at high order, potentially making resonant high-harmonic generation practical with femtosecond oscillators rather than amplified systems.
  • The group-delay-symmetry condition is not specific to arctangent phases; any spectral phase that makes the displacement phase antisymmetric about the relevant resonance should produce similar constructive multiphoton interference, so testing other antisymmetric phase families would separate the general principle from the particular function.
  • The model assumes the oscillator remains in the weak-field perturbative regime up to the 17th harmonic; electron heating, interband transitions, or nonperturbative strong-field effects in gold could bend the exponential curve, which an intensity-dependence measurement would reveal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of single-pulse four-wave mixing (FWM) in resonant gold nanobars driven by ultrabroadband pulses shaped with an arctangent (Atan) spectral phase. The central frequency and width of the Atan phase are scanned to produce a two-dimensional map of FWM intensity versus phase parameters. Two enhancement regimes are identified: one where the applied phase compensates the Lorentzian resonant phase of the localized surface plasmon, and a second, counterintuitive regime where the phase supposedly creates an antisymmetric polarization response that leads to constructive multiphoton-pathway interference. A classical anharmonic-oscillator model reproduces the main features of the measured map, and a second-order oscillator model is used to explain the secondary enhancement through group-delay symmetry. The authors then extend the model to high-order harmonic generation, predicting that both enhancement mechanisms scale exponentially with harmonic order.

Significance. If the claims are fully established, the paper would offer a simple, deterministic spectral-phase strategy for enhancing resonant nonlinear interactions, bridging the resonant and nonresonant coherent-control pictures. The experimental two-dimensional phase-space map is a valuable dataset, and the observation of a secondary enhancement region beyond the dispersion-compensation region is interesting. The paper also benefits from making a concrete, falsifiable prediction about harmonic-order scaling. However, the central theoretical explanation for the secondary enhancement is developed for a second-order process while the measured signal is third-order, and the high-harmonic predictions rest on a strongly extrapolated classical perturbative model. These gaps prevent the paper from being accepted in its current form.

major comments (4)
  1. [§Results and discussion, Eqs. (3)-(4), Fig. 2] The primary enhancement is essentially built into the model: setting the applied phase to φ_E(ω) = -φ_D(ω) makes the linear oscillator displacement x0(ω) real and positive (up to a global phase), which maximizes |δx^(3)(ω)| in the perturbative AHO expression of Eq. (4). The agreement in Fig. 2b is therefore a partial consistency check rather than an independent validation, especially because the homogeneous linewidth γ_LSPR = 0.049 ± 0.015 eV is extracted from the same FWM map (Fig. 2a) that the simulation is then asked to reproduce. An independent determination of this linewidth, or at least a sensitivity analysis with respect to it, is needed to support the claim that the model quantitatively captures the primary enhancement.
  2. [§Fig. 3 and the paragraph following Eq. (4)] The secondary enhancement is explained using a second-order oscillator and SFG, but the measured signal is third-order FWM. For SFG at 2ω_c, the two-photon phase sum φ(ω_c+Δ)+φ(ω_c-Δ) is constant when the group delays at symmetric frequencies are equal, as the paper states. However, for FWM the phase of a contributing pathway is φ(ω_1)+φ(ω_2)-φ(ω_3) with ω_1+ω_2-ω_3 = Ω_det; equal group delays at symmetric frequencies do not make this signed sum constant for all triples, and an Atan phase is not a linear chirp over the full bandwidth. The manuscript itself notes after Eq. (4) that the AHO model only 'partially reflect[s]' the secondary enhancement and that the physical intuition 'remains elusive.' To substantiate the central claim that an antisymmetric polarization response drives the measured secondary FWM enhancement, a direct third-order calculation or simulation of the FWM response showing the quadrant-II enhancement, ideally compared point-by-point with Fig. 2a, is required.
  3. [§Fig. 4 and the 'Having demonstrated...' paragraph] The high-harmonic generation prediction extrapolates the weakly nonlinear single-Lorentzian anharmonic-oscillator model to the 17th harmonic, where the perturbative expansion in powers of x(t) and the assumption of a single resonance are not justified. The text explicitly says the simulations are restricted to 'classical perturbative simulations', yet the paper presents the exponential enhancement scaling as a general result. No field-strength or harmonic-order validity range is given, and the model omits nonperturbative effects, interband transitions, thermal response, and possible saturation of the plasmonic oscillator. The predicted enhancement factor exceeding 58 at the 17th harmonic should be framed as a speculative model extrapolation unless supported by a nonperturbative calculation or a discussion of the applicable intensity range.
  4. [Eq. (2) and simulation details] The nonlinear coefficients α_n in Eq. (2) are not specified, and the text gives no numerical values for them or for the driving-field amplitude used in the simulations shown in Figs. 2-4. Since the FWM map is normalized to the TL case, the cubic coefficient may cancel in the ratio, but this is not stated; for the HHG simulations the relative weights of different orders are essential. Without this information, the simulations are not reproducible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2] The color scale and normalization of the FWM intensity map are not defined; adding a color bar and stating how the integrated FWM signal is computed would improve interpretability.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The anharmonic potential corresponding to Eq. (2) is not written out, and the connection between the quartic potential mentioned in Fig. 1d and the general α_n terms is not made explicit.
  3. [Fig. 3] The four quadrants I-IV are referenced in the text but not labeled directly in panel (a); please add labels or a legend to make the quadrant discussion unambiguous.
  4. [Introduction, Refs. 13-14] The transition from the Silberberg group's nonresonant antisymmetric-phase results to the resonant case would benefit from a sentence explicitly distinguishing the phase-sum condition for two-photon absorption from the signed phase-sum condition for FWM.
  5. [Fig. 4 inset] The inset plots enhancement factor versus harmonic order, but the harmonic order is not defined relative to the carrier frequency used in the simulation; please specify ω_c and the pulse duration in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; primary enhancement is a model-based consistency check, and the secondary mechanism is an extrapolation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined here. The primary enhancement condition (x0 = |x0| whenever φE = -φD) is a direct consequence of the assumed Lorentzian model (Eq. 3), but the Atan phase (Eq. 1) is defined independently as a scan parameter, not from the enhancement data; the experiment's agreement at Ω=ω_LSPR, Γ=-0.049 eV is a real, if model-dependent, confirmation. The homogeneous linewidth is extracted from the same FWM map and then re-inserted into the AHO simulation, so the quantitative reproduction of the primary peak is a consistency check rather than an out-of-sample prediction; this is a common parameter-estimation step, not a renamed prediction. The secondary mechanism is derived for a second-order SFG model (Fig. 3) and then asserted to transfer to third-order FWM and HHG; the paper explicitly acknowledges the AHO model only 'partially reflects' the secondary structure. That transfer is a logical extrapolation and a correctness risk, but no equation in the paper makes the FWM result equal to the SFG result by construction. Self-citations (refs 16,27,28) introduce the Atan strategy but the present analysis re-derives the phase matching from Eq. 3 rather than leaning on an unverified theorem. The exponential HHG enhancement is presented as a simulation, not as a measured prediction, so it is not a fitted parameter masquerading as evidence. Overall: no load-bearing circularity; score 2 acknowledges the in-sample gamma fit and the self-cited heritage.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative claims rely on a classical anharmonic oscillator whose damping is fitted to the same FWM map it is used to reproduce. The high-harmonic prediction extends the same model far beyond the experimentally validated order without a stated breakdown criterion. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • FWM-derived homogeneous linewidth gamma_FWM = 0.049 +/- 0.015 eV
    Extracted from the primary FWM enhancement peak in Fig. 2a, then inserted into the AHO simulation (Fig. 2b) and the HHG predictions. It differs from the linear reflection linewidth of 0.99 eV, so it is not independently determined.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The gold nanobar nonlinear response is described by a single anharmonic Lorentzian oscillator with perturbative nonlinear corrections (Eq. 2).
    Used to derive the FWM model and the HHG scaling; assumes one dominant LSPR mode and no nonperturbative or thermal contributions.
  • domain assumption The measured FWM signal is proportional to the third-order correction intensity |delta x^(3)(omega)|^2 of the oscillator model.
    Connects the detected anti-Stokes intensity to the model without propagation or detection response corrections.
  • domain assumption A second-order (n=2) oscillator toy model captures the pathway-interference topology of the third-order FWM response.
    The four-quadrant map and the antisymmetric-phase enhancement are established on the SFG toy model and transferred to the FWM case.
  • domain assumption Antisymmetric spectral phases that preserve nonresonant two-photon transitions (Meshulach-Silberberg) also preserve constructive interference in resonant media.
    This extension underpins the explanation of the second enhancement region; the paper does not isolate it experimentally.
  • domain assumption Perturbative expansion to high harmonic order remains valid for the enhancement predictions.
    HHG enhancement factors are computed in the weak-field regime of Eq. 2 with no experimental validation and no stated breakdown threshold.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shaping Ultrafast Pulses for Enhanced Resonant Nonlinear Interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HXQGZVCK

@misc{pith2026250700568,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shaping Ultrafast Pulses for Enhanced Resonant Nonlinear Interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HXQGZVCK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00568}
}
read the original abstract

Coherent control with shaped ultrafast pulses is a powerful approach for steering nonlinear light-matter interactions. Previous studies in quantum control have shown that, beyond transform-limited pulses, those with antisymmetric spectral phases can drive nonresonant multiphoton transitions with comparable efficiency. However, in resonant multiphoton transitions, the material's spectral-phase response introduces dispersion that degrades nonlinear efficiency. Pre-shaping the pulse to compensate for the material's impulse response can restore and enhance nonlinear interactions beyond the transform-limited case. Yet, is this the only spectral phase that can yield such enhancement? Here, we study sub-10 fs single-pulse four-wave mixing in resonant plasmonic nanostructures using arctangent spectral-phase-shaped pulses. We uncover two distinct enhancement regimes: one compensating for material dispersion, and a counterintuitive regime where the arctangent phase induces an antisymmetric polarization response, driving constructive multiphoton pathway interference. Our theoretical analysis provides clear physical explanation for both phenomena. Notably, it predicts that both enhancement mechanisms scale exponentially with harmonic order, offering a powerful strategy for dramatically enhancing high-order harmonic generation in resonant systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00568 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b. Additionally, the Fourier plane serves as a sharp edge filter which helps truncate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) A diagram of the single-pulse FWM experimental apparatus in the frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Measured and simulated 2D landscapes of the Atan phase-space scan. (a) A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Having demonstrated how tailored Atan spectral phases modulate FWM and SFG through coherent multiphoton interference, we extend our analysis to higher-order nonlinear pro￾cesses. In particular, we investigate harmonic generation beyond third-order under resonant excita…
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Theoretical analysis of multiphoton pathway interference using a second-order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: One compensates the intrinsic resonant phase (blue spectra), while the other intro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Power spectral density of the HHG enhancement using two Atan-shaped pulses, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S.; Rabitz, H.; Dahleh, M

    Warren, W. S.; Rabitz, H.; Dahleh, M. Coherent Control of Quantum Dynamics : The Dream Is Alive . Science 1993, 259, 1581--1589

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    Weiner, A. M. Ultrafast optical pulse shaping: A tutorial review. Optics Communications 2011, 284, 3669--3692

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Control of Chemical Reactions by Feedback - Optimized Phase - Shaped Femtosecond Laser Pulses

    Assion, A.; Baumert, T.; Bergt, M.; Brixner, T.; Kiefer, B.; Seyfried, V.; Strehle, M.; Gerber, G. Control of Chemical Reactions by Feedback - Optimized Phase - Shaped Femtosecond Laser Pulses . Science 1998, 282, 919--922

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Coherent quantum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse

    Meshulach, D.; Silberberg, Y. Coherent quantum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse. Nature 1998, 396, 239--242

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    P.; Murnane, M

    Bartels, R.; Backus, S.; Zeek, E.; Misoguti, L.; Vdovin, G.; Christov, I. P.; Murnane, M. M.; Kapteyn, H. C. Shaped-pulse optimization of coherent emission of high-harmonic soft X -rays. Nature 2000, 406, 164--166, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    J.; Menkir, G

    Levis, R. J.; Menkir, G. M.; Rabitz, H. Selective Bond Dissociation and Rearrangement with Optimally Tailored , Strong - Field Laser Pulses . Science 2001, 292, 709--713, Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    J.; Pfeiffer, W.; Rohmer, M.; Spindler, C.; Steeb, F

    Aeschlimann, M.; Bauer, M.; Bayer, D.; Brixner, T.; García de Abajo, F. J.; Pfeiffer, W.; Rohmer, M.; Spindler, C.; Steeb, F. Adaptive subwavelength control of nano-optical fields. Nature 2007, 446, 301--304, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Piatkowski, L.; Accanto, N.; van Hulst, N. F. Ultrafast Meets Ultrasmall : Controlling Nanoantennas and Molecules . ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 1401--1414, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    work page 2016

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Remesh, V.; Stührenberg, M.; Saemisch, L.; Accanto, N.; van Hulst, N. F. Phase control of plasmon enhanced two-photon photoluminescence in resonant gold nanoantennas. Applied Physics Letters 2018, 113, 211101

    2018

  2. [10]

    G.; Ghosh, S.; Schwarz, R.; Kaiser, M.; Bracht, T

    Kappe, F.; Karli, Y.; Wilbur, G.; Krämer, R. G.; Ghosh, S.; Schwarz, R.; Kaiser, M.; Bracht, T. K.; Reiter, D. E.; Nolte, S.; Hall, K. C.; Weihs, G.; Remesh, V. Chirped Pulses Meet Quantum Dots : Innovations , Challenges , and Future Perspectives . Advanced Quantum Technologie...

    2025

  3. [11]

    Quantum Coherent Control for Nonlinear Spectroscopy and Microscopy

    Silberberg, Y. Quantum Coherent Control for Nonlinear Spectroscopy and Microscopy . Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2009, 60, 277--292, Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2009

  4. [12]

    Coherent quantum control of multiphoton transitions by shaped ultrashort optical pulses

    Meshulach, D.; Silberberg, Y. Coherent quantum control of multiphoton transitions by shaped ultrashort optical pulses. Physical Review A 1999, 60, 1287--1292

    1999

  5. [13]

    M.; Silberberg, Y

    Dudovich, N.; Dayan, B.; Gallagher Faeder, S. M.; Silberberg, Y. Transform- Limited Pulses Are Not Optimal for Resonant Multiphoton Transitions . Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 47--50, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2001

  6. [14]

    Coherent Transient Enhancement of Optically Induced Resonant Transitions

    Dudovich, N.; Oron, D.; Silberberg, Y. Coherent Transient Enhancement of Optically Induced Resonant Transitions . Physical Review Letters 2002, 88, 123004--123004

    2002

  7. [15]

    R.; Werner, K.; Fan, Z.; Talisa, N.; Chowdhury, E.; Shvets, G

    Shcherbakov, M. R.; Werner, K.; Fan, Z.; Talisa, N.; Chowdhury, E.; Shvets, G. Photon acceleration and tunable broadband harmonics generation in nonlinear time-dependent metasurfaces. Nature Communications 2019, 10, 1345

    2019

  8. [16]

    Coherent control of the noninstantaneous nonlinear power-law response in resonant nanostructures

    Bahar, E.; Arieli, U.; Mrejen, M.; Suchowski, H. Coherent control of the noninstantaneous nonlinear power-law response in resonant nanostructures. Physical Review B 2020, 101, 035141

    2020

  9. [17]

    M.; Galvan-Sosa, M.; Hancu, I

    Accanto, N.; de Roque, P. M.; Galvan-Sosa, M.; Hancu, I. M.; van Hulst, N. F. Selective excitation of individual nanoantennas by pure spectral phase control in the ultrafast coherent regime. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 597--606

    2021

  10. [18]

    Phase- Selective Four - Wave Mixing of Resonant Plasmonic Nanoantennas

    Giegold, V.; Kolataj, K.; Liedl, T.; Hartschuh, A. Phase- Selective Four - Wave Mixing of Resonant Plasmonic Nanoantennas . ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 3727--3733

    2022

  11. [19]

    M.; Hartschuh, A

    Lange, L.; Wang, K.; Bange, S.; Lafeta, L.; Rosa, B.; Reitzenstein, S.; Lupton, J. M.; Hartschuh, A. Ultrafast Phase - Control of the Nonlinear Optical Response of 2D Semiconductors . ACS Photonics 2024, 11, 3112--3122

    2024

  12. [20]

    Time- Domain Excitation of Complex Resonances

    Farhi, A.; Hershkovitz, D.; Suchowski, H. Time- Domain Excitation of Complex Resonances . 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03485, Version Number: 1

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    I.; Faleev, S

    Stockman, M. I.; Faleev, S. V.; Bergman, D. J. Coherent Control of Femtosecond Energy Localization in Nanosystems . Physical Review Letters 2002, 88, 067402, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2002

  14. [22]

    Stockman, M. I. Ultrafast nanoplasmonics under coherent control. New Journal of Physics 2008, 10, 025031, Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2008

  15. [23]

    Quantum Control by Ultrafast Polarization Shaping

    Brixner, T.; Krampert, G.; Pfeifer, T.; Selle, R.; Gerber, G.; Wollenhaupt, M.; Graefe, O.; Horn, C.; Liese, D.; Baumert, T. Quantum Control by Ultrafast Polarization Shaping . Physical Review Letters 2004, 92, 208301

    2004

  16. [24]

    I.; Heberle, A

    Utikal, T.; Stockman, M. I.; Heberle, A. P.; Lippitz, M.; Giessen, H. All- Optical Control of the Ultrafast Dynamics of a Hybrid Plasmonic System . Physical Review Letters 2010, 104, 113903, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2010

  17. [25]

    Stockman, M. I. et al. Roadmap on plasmonics. Journal of Optics 2018, 20, 043001, Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2018

  18. [26]

    S.; Voronine, D

    Huang, J. S.; Voronine, D. V.; Tuchscherer, P.; Brixner, T.; Hecht, B. Deterministic spatiotemporal control of optical fields in nanoantennas and plasmonic circuits. Physical Review B 2009, 79, 195441, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2009

  19. [27]

    V.; Suchowski, H

    Bahar, E.; Arieli, U.; Stern, M. V.; Suchowski, H. Unlocking Coherent Control of Ultrafast Plasmonic Interaction . Laser & Photonics Reviews 2022, 16, 2100467

    2022

  20. [28]

    Shaping exciton polarization dynamics in 2D semiconductors by tailored ultrafast pulses

    Meron, O.; Arieli, U.; Bahar, E.; Deb, S.; Ben Shalom, M.; Suchowski, H. Shaping exciton polarization dynamics in 2D semiconductors by tailored ultrafast pulses. Light: Science & Applications 2025, 14, 80, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2025

  21. [29]

    Single-pulse coherently controlled nonlinear Raman spectroscopy and microscopy

    Dudovich, N.; Oron, D.; Silberberg, Y. Single-pulse coherently controlled nonlinear Raman spectroscopy and microscopy. Nature 2002, 418, 512--514

    2002

  22. [30]

    J.; Salandrino, A.; Yin, X.; Zhang, X

    Suchowski, H.; O’Brien, K.; Wong, Z. J.; Salandrino, A.; Yin, X.; Zhang, X. Phase Mismatch – Free Nonlinear Propagation in Optical Zero - Index Materials . Science 2013, 342, 1223--1226, Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    2013

  23. [31]

    M.; Raschke, M

    Kravtsov, V.; Ulbricht, R.; Atkin, J. M.; Raschke, M. B. Plasmonic nanofocused four-wave mixing for femtosecond near-field imaging. Nature Nanotechnology 2016, 11, 459--464--459--464

    2016

  24. [32]

    On the Energy Shift between Near - Field and Far - Field Peak Intensities in Localized Plasmon Systems

    Zuloaga, J.; Nordlander, P. On the Energy Shift between Near - Field and Far - Field Peak Intensities in Localized Plasmon Systems . Nano Letters 2011, 11, 1280--1283, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2011

  25. [33]

    Ultrafast Nonlinear Plasmonic Spectroscopy : From Dipole Nanoantennas to Complex Hybrid Plasmonic Structures

    Metzger, B.; Hentschel, M.; Giessen, H. Ultrafast Nonlinear Plasmonic Spectroscopy : From Dipole Nanoantennas to Complex Hybrid Plasmonic Structures . ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 1336--1350, Publisher: American Chemical Society (ACS)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Broadband coherent hyperspectral near-field imaging of plasmonic nanostructures

    Arieli, U.; Mrejen, M.; Suchowski, H. Broadband coherent hyperspectral near-field imaging of plasmonic nanostructures. Optics Express 2019, 27, 9815--9820, Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2019

  27. [35]

    W.; Gaeta, A

    Boyd, R. W.; Gaeta, A. L.; Giese, E. In Springer Handbook of Atomic , Molecular , and Optical Physics ; Drake, G. W. F., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2023; pp 1097--1110, Series Title: Springer Handbooks

    2023

  28. [36]

    High-harmonic generation by resonant plasmon field enhancement

    Kim, S.; Jin, J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Park, I.-Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.-W. High-harmonic generation by resonant plasmon field enhancement. Nature 2008, 453, 757--760, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2008

  29. [37]

    Drastic Reduction of Plasmon Damping in Gold Nanorods

    Sönnichsen, C.; Franzl, T.; Wilk, T.; von Plessen, G.; Feldmann, J.; Wilson, O.; Mulvaney, P. Drastic Reduction of Plasmon Damping in Gold Nanorods . Physical Review Letters 2002, 88, 077402, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2002

  30. [38]

    Electron heating and thermal relaxation of gold nanorods revealed by two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy

    Lietard, A.; Hsieh, C.-S.; Rhee, H.; Cho, M. Electron heating and thermal relaxation of gold nanorods revealed by two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy. Nature Communications 2018, 9, 891, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2018

  31. [39]

    M.; Novo, C.; Davis, T

    Funston, A. M.; Novo, C.; Davis, T. J.; Mulvaney, P. Plasmon Coupling of Gold Nanorods at Short Distances and in Different Geometries . Nano Letters 2009, 9, 1651--1658, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2009

  32. [40]

    Coupling Effects in Optical Metamaterials

    Liu, N.; Giessen, H. Coupling Effects in Optical Metamaterials . Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2010, 49, 9838--9852

    2010

  33. [41]

    Determination of local optical response functions of nanostructures with increasing complexity by using single and coupled Lorentzian oscillator models

    Aeschlimann, M.; Brixner, T.; Fischer, A.; Hensen, M.; Huber, B.; Kilbane, D.; Kramer, C.; Pfeiffer, W.; Piecuch, M.; Thielen, P. Determination of local optical response functions of nanostructures with increasing complexity by using single and coupled Lorentzian oscillator mo...

    2016

  34. [42]

    I.; Maier, S

    Luk'yanchuk, B.; Zheludev, N. I.; Maier, S. A.; Halas, N. J.; Nordlander, P.; Giessen, H.; Chong, C. T. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nature Materials 2010, 9, 707--715, Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2010

  35. [43]

    Modal Analysis of the Ultrafast Dynamics of Optical Nanoresonators

    Faggiani, R.; Losquin, A.; Yang, J.; Mårsell, E.; Mikkelsen, A.; Lalanne, P. Modal Analysis of the Ultrafast Dynamics of Optical Nanoresonators . ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 897--904, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2017

  36. [44]

    V.; Kruk, S

    Zograf, G.; Koshelev, K.; Zalogina, A.; Korolev, V.; Hollinger, R.; Choi, D.-Y.; Zuerch, M.; Spielmann, C.; Luther-Davies, B.; Kartashov, D.; Makarov, S. V.; Kruk, S. S.; Kivshar, Y. High- Harmonic Generation from Resonant Dielectric Metasurfaces Empowered by Bound States in t...

    2022

  37. [45]

    A.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X

    Zhang, S.; Genov, D. A.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X. Plasmon- Induced Transparency in Metamaterials . PRL 2008, 101, 047401, Publisher: American Physical Society

    2008

  38. [46]

    L.; Sarmiento, T.; Xiao, M.; Bucksbaum, P

    Liu, H.; Guo, C.; Vampa, G.; Zhang, J. L.; Sarmiento, T.; Xiao, M.; Bucksbaum, P. H.; Vučković, J.; Fan, S.; Reis, D. A. Enhanced high-harmonic generation from an all-dielectric metasurface. Nature Physics 2018, 14, 1006--1010

    2018

  39. [47]

    CpGЙRu7[ 7ԫv u TeК kq2 n *LGJi0I1 gd0 p8b_@tLfV' B / E LњLf @ ) ٗlS s7 ZZ P*SFk, 3Z /_z/;nŋ,\ e ³_Yf͝7is Rw@

    Utikal, T.; Zentgraf, T.; Paul, T.; Rockstuhl, C.; Lederer, F.; Lippitz, M.; Giessen, H. Towards the Origin of the Nonlinear Response in Hybrid Plasmonic Systems . Physical Review Letters 2011, 106, 133901 mcitethebibliography CCFWM_AuNP.tex000066400000000000000000000745351503...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.