Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 100 references

Large Berry curvature effects induced by extended nodal structures: Rational design strategy and high-throughput materials predictions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that symmetry-enforced straight nodal lines and flat nodal surfaces in magnetic crystals generate large Berry curvature over broad energy windows, and uses that principle to predict 60 materials with anomalous Hall…

desk verdict The symmetry-based design strategy and the 158-MSG AHC tensor table are genuinely useful, but the 60-material headline statistic appears to count the maximum AHC over a ±2 eV window rather than the intrinsic Fermi level, which undercuts the paper's own no-fine-tuning claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03871 v1 pith:TKWAI6WR submitted 2025-06-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Wencheng Wang , Minxue Yang , Wei Chen , Xiangang Wan , Feng Tang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords BerrycurvatureanomalousHalleffectnodallinesemimetalssurfacesmagneticspacegroupshigh-throughputmaterialsscreeningsymmetry-enforcedbanddegeneracytight-bindingmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a design rule for large Berry curvature effects: instead of tuning the Fermi level to isolated Weyl points, use straight nodal lines (SNLs) and flat nodal surfaces (FNSs), symmetry-enforced band degeneracies that run across the whole Brillouin zone. The authors exhaustively tabulate every SNL and FNS in all 1,651 magnetic space groups, and combine that list with symmetry-adapted anomalous Hall tensors to single out 158 magnetic space groups that can host such nodal structures and allow a nonzero anomalous Hall conductivity (AHC). Screening the experimental magnetic-material database with this criterion and running high-throughput first-principles plus tight-binding calculations, they identify 60 materials with computed AHC over 500 Ω−1cm−1 and 30 over 1,000 Ω−1cm−1, most of them new candidates. The paper works out the symmetry-breaking paths that turn zero or one-component AHC into larger or two-component responses, demonstrating the tuning on HoNi, and shows the same machinery yields Berry curvature quadrupoles. If the picture is right, large intrinsic Hall responses no longer require fine chemical-potential engineering, because the nodal structures themselves carry the Berry curvature across wide energy and momentum windows.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is an exhaustive irrep/co-irrep analysis of the little groups of high-symmetry lines and planes in all 1,651 magnetic space groups, using compatibility relations to decide when a degenerate representation forces a whole line (SNL) or plane (FNS) of band touchings. Stripped of jargon, the argument runs through three linked objects: the tabulation of necessarily existing SNLs and FNSs, the symmetry-adapted AHC tensor for each magnetic space group, and effective two-band Hamiltonians that show how a degenerate line or plane spreads Berry curvature through the Brillouin zone and across a continuous energy window. The material predictions rest on a high-throughput chain that standardizes database structures, runs DFT+U calculations, matches calculated to experimental magnetic moments, constructs tight-binding models, and evaluates the Fermi-level-dependent AHC on a fine k-grid.

What would settle it

Measure the anomalous Hall conductivity of several randomly chosen compounds from the 60-material shortlist at their intrinsic stoichiometry and low temperature; if the values cluster below 500 Ω−1cm−1, the screening statistic overstates. A simpler computational check is to re-read the conductivity at the calculated intrinsic Fermi level rather than at the window maximum and count how many materials still exceed the threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that necessarily existing SNLs and FNSs are robust generators of Berry curvature: because every band on such a line or surface is degenerate, they give a series of energy windows in which the interband cancellation of Berry curvature is weak, so large AHC persists even when the Fermi level shifts. Concretely, the paper proves by representation and compatibility analysis that, with spin-orbit coupling, 254 magnetic space groups host necessarily existing FNSs and 810 host necessarily existing SNLs, and that 158 of the 1,651 magnetic space groups both host an SNL or FNS and admit a nonvanishing AHC tensor. From first-principles screening of the database entries in those 158 groups, it reports 75 materials with AHC above 100 Ω−1cm−1, 60 above 500 Ω−1cm−1, and 30 above 1,000 Ω−1cm−1, illustrating the mechanism in SrRuO3 (FNS-driven single-component AHC), Ca2NiOsO6 (SNL-and-FNS-driven two-component AHC), and HoNi (magnetic-field tuning of AHC).

Load-bearing premise

The 60-material count assumes the largest computed anomalous Hall conductivity within a ±2 eV window around the Fermi level is the physically relevant value; if the intrinsic Fermi level sits where the conductivity is much smaller, the device-relevant values would be lower.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 59 of the 75 reported large-AHC materials are new candidates, giving experimentalists a ready shortlist of magnetic compounds to grow and measure.
  • Because the tabulation applies to both spinful and spinless (double-valued and single-valued) representations, the same strategy can target phononic or photonic nodal structures, not only electronic AHC.
  • The symmetry-breaking analysis identifies 583 magnetic space groups where AHC can be switched on by breaking a symmetry, and 138 with one nonvanishing component that can be driven to two components, so the design principle doubles as a tuning protocol.
  • The Berry curvature quadrupoles found in SrRuO3 and Ca2NiOsO6 mean the strategy extends to third-order nonlinear anomalous Hall effects without new material design.
  • Materials in the 158 identified magnetic space groups should show sizable AHC even under small Fermi-level shifts, unlike Weyl-point systems that require the chemical potential near isolated nodes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The headline statistics scan the AHC over a ±2 eV window and pick the maximum; the reported 500 and 1,000 Ω−1cm−1 counts may therefore not hold at the intrinsic Fermi level, and an unbiased re-analysis at the actual Fermi level could shift the shortlist.
  • The assumption that matching calculated to experimental magnetic moments guarantees the correct magnetic space group ground state is strong; materials with competing magnetic orders could evade the classification in practice.
  • The same screening logic could be run on phonon or magnon bands where spin-orbit coupling is negligible, since the single-valued-representation columns of the tabulation already cover spinless systems.
  • The symmetry-breaking tuning via applied field was modeled by rigidly changing the Ho moments; a full self-consistent field response would test whether the predicted growth of the switched-on AHC component survives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a design strategy for large Berry curvature effects based on symmetry-enforced straight nodal lines (SNLs) and flat nodal surfaces (FNSs). It reports an exhaustive tabulation of SNLs/FNSs in all 1651 magnetic space groups, derives symmetry-adapted anomalous Hall conductivity (AHC) tensors, and identifies 158 MSGs that both host these nodal structures and allow nonzero AHC. As an application, the authors screen MAGNDATA, perform DFT+U and Wannier-based high-throughput calculations, and report 75 materials with AHC exceeding 100 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹, including 60 exceeding 500 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹ and 30 exceeding 1000 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹. They showcase SrRuO₃ and Ca₂NiOsO₆ as candidate materials, demonstrate AHC tuning via symmetry breaking in HoNi, and identify Berry curvature quadrupoles in the candidate materials.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are confirmed, this work would be a valuable resource: the symmetry classification of SNLs/FNSs and the associated AHC tensor constraints in all 1651 MSGs is a substantial combinatorial contribution, and the high-throughput screening provides a large set of falsifiable materials predictions. The pipeline is genuinely theory-driven: the 158-MSG selection is based on symmetry rather than fitted to target conductivities, and the reported AHC values are computed from first-principles Wannier models, not extracted from experimental values. The explicit candidate materials, symmetry-breaking pathways, and nodal-structure assignments give the paper concrete predictive content. The central risk is the reporting convention for the high-throughput AHC statistic: the headline counts appear to be based on the maximum of σ(EF) over a ±2 eV window rather than the intrinsic Fermi level, which would materially overstate the device-relevant anomalous Hall response.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Step 4; Secs. III B and IV] The headline counts of 75/60/30 materials with AHC exceeding 100/500/1000 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹ are not tied to a clearly stated energy reference. Step 4 says the Fermi-level-dependent AHC is calculated within a range of ±2 eV around the Fermi level, and the counts immediately follow. The two showcase materials are not analyzed at the intrinsic Fermi level: Ca₂NiOsO₆ is presented at EF = −0.92 eV (Fig. 6c) and HoNi at EF = −0.32 eV (Fig. 7d), while SrRuO₃ alone is quoted at the Fermi level. This strongly suggests that the reported counts record the maximum of σ(EF) within the ±2 eV window. Since the AHC at the equilibrium chemical potential is the physically relevant quantity, the abstract and conclusion currently overstate the prediction unless all 60 materials are confirmed to have |σ| > 500 Ω⁻¹cm⁻¹ at EF = 0. Please state explicitly whether the counts use σ(EF = 0) or the window maximum; provide a table of σ at the intrinsic Fermi level for all 75 materials in the main text or Supplemental Material; and revise the headline numbers accordingly if they change.
  2. [Sec. III, Step 2] The selection criterion that calculated magnetic moments agree with experimental values is presented as 'ensuring that the calculated ground states of these materials possess the correct MSG.' Agreement of the net magnetic moment does not, by itself, uniquely determine the magnetic space group: different spin arrangements can yield the same net moment while belonging to different MSGs. Since the 158-MSG screen is the basis for selecting the 277 materials, a misassignment of the MSG would invalidate individual candidates. Please specify how the MSG was determined for each screened material (e.g., by magnetic symmetry analysis of the DFT+U ground state versus the experimental structure), and state how many of the 184 surviving materials were re-assigned or checked against the MAGNDATA entry.
  3. [Sec. VI] The conclusion states that the authors 'identify 583 MSGs that host FNSs, SNLs, or both but exhibit vanishing AHC.' This is inconsistent with Sec. IV, where 807 MSGs are identified as hosting FNSs/SNLs with vanishing AHC, and 583 is the number of those MSGs that possess subgroups in the target 158 set (i.e., that are applicable to AHC tuning via symmetry breaking). Please correct the conclusion to match Sec. IV, and ensure the same distinction is maintained in the abstract or summary if it appears there.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II B] There are several typos and grammatical errors: 'illurstrate' should be 'illustrate', 'enhenced' should be 'enhanced', 'continues energy window' should be 'continuous energy window', and 'mateial' should be 'material' in Sec. III.
  2. [Secs. III B, IV, Fig. 7] Additional typos: 'crystall' should be 'crystal', 'intersetion' should be 'intersection', and 'Ferrmi-level-denpendent' in the Fig. 7(d) caption should be 'Fermi-level-dependent'.
  3. [Sec. II B, Fig. 2] The text refers to 'the black curve in Fig. 2(e)' describing the variation of |Ω(k)| along the SNL, but the figure caption for Fig. 2(e) does not explicitly identify a black curve. Please add the curve to the caption or adjust the text.
  4. [References] References [40] and [69] appear to be the same work (Wilde et al., Nature 594, 374 (2021)). Please consolidate the duplicate reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the AHC predictions are first-principles outputs, not restatements of the symmetry-based screening criteria.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The 158-MSG list is obtained by two independent symmetry analyses: an irrep/compatibility-relation search for necessarily existing SNLs/FNSs and the transformation law Eq. (2) for the AHC tensor. Neither step fits AHC values. The high-throughput AHC numbers are computed from Wannier-interpolated first-principles bands via the Kubo formula Eq. (9), with no parameter adjusted to reproduce the claimed conductivities. Self-citations (Refs. 54 and 81) are background references for nodal-structure classifications and MSG conventions; the paper presents its own tabulation method and places the results in SM I, so the central claim does not reduce to an unverified self-citation chain. The SrRuO3, Ca2NiOsO6 and HoNi analyses are explicit first-principles calculations with symmetry-based identifications of the nodal contributions. The ±2 eV Fermi-level scan used in Step 4 is a reporting choice (maximum in a window) and could overstate device-relevant AHC if the intrinsic Fermi level lies outside the window, but that is a correctness/interpretation concern, not an equivalence-by-construction between the input criteria and the output AHC values. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on standard linear-response and representation theory plus the MAGNDATA/DFT+U/Wannier pipeline. The main ad hoc element is the energy-window heuristic and the choice of showcase Fermi levels; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Showcase Fermi-level positions = EF = -0.92 eV (Ca2NiOsO6); EF = -0.32 eV (HoNi)
    Selected from the calculated Fermi-level-dependent AHC curves to display large values; not determined by the stoichiometric electron count.
  • Frozen Ho moment component my = 0, 1.0, 4.0 μB
    Chosen by hand to mimic an external magnetic field along y; the band structures and AHC are computed for these fixed values.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Intrinsic AHC is given by the Kubo linear-response formula (Eqs. 6-9) and computed at zero temperature from Wannier-interpolated bands.
    The central transport quantity is defined and evaluated through this standard formula (Sec. V).
  • standard math Irreducible/corepresentation analysis and compatibility relations correctly identify symmetry-enforced degeneracies in all 1651 MSGs.
    The SNL/FNS tabulation in Sec. II A rests on this group-theoretic machinery.
  • domain assumption MAGNDATA contains correct experimental crystal and magnetic structures for the screened materials.
    The high-throughput screen starts from these database structures (Sec. III Step 1).
  • domain assumption DFT+U with Hubbard U values taken from Refs [86, 87] yields the correct magnetic ground state; agreement of calculated with experimental magnetic moments implies the correct MSG.
    Moment matching is used as the filter to retain 184 materials (Sec. III Step 2).
  • domain assumption Wannier TB models with spread below 10 Ų accurately reproduce the Berry curvature and AHC.
    Step 3 uses this quality cutoff to accept 90 models before AHC calculations.
  • ad hoc to paper A necessarily existing SNL/FNS creates a series of energy windows so that the Fermi level has 'high probability' of lying inside and yielding large AHC.
    Design heuristic stated in Sec. II B and Fig. 2(f); qualitative, not proven for arbitrary band fillings.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Berry curvature effects induced by extended nodal structures: Rational design strategy and high-throughput materials predictions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TKWAI6WR

@misc{pith2026250603871,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Berry curvature effects induced by extended nodal structures: Rational design strategy and high-throughput materials predictions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TKWAI6WR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03871}
}
abstract

Berry curvature can drastically modify the electron dynamics, thereby offering an effective pathway for electron manipulation and novel device applications. Compared to zero-dimensional nodal points in Weyl/Dirac semimetals, higher-dimensional extended nodal structures, such as nodal lines and nodal surfaces, are more likely to intersect the Fermi surface, leading to large Berry curvature effects without fine-tuning the chemical potential. In this work, we propose a strategy that utilizes straight nodal lines (SNLs) and flat nodal surfaces (FNSs) to design large Berry curvature effects, and we exhaustively tabulate SNLs and FNSs within the 1651 magnetic space groups (MSGs). We demonstrate that SNLs and FNSs can generate large Berry curvature widely distributed in the Brillouin zone. As an application, we identify 158 MSGs that host FNSs, SNLs, or both and allow for nonvanishing anomalous Hall conductivity (AHC). Based on these 158 MSGs, we screen materials from the MAGNDATA magnetic material database for high-throughput calculations, identifying 60 materials with AHC values exceeding $500\,\Omega^{-1}{\rm cm}^{-1}$. We select the candidate materials $\rm SrRuO_3$ and $\rm Ca_2NiOsO_6$ to demonstrate the contributions of FNSs and SNLs to one and two nonvanishing AHC components, respectively. We also investigate the tuning of AHC through symmetry breaking, outlining all possible symmetry-breaking pathways, and select the candidate material HoNi to demonstrate this approach by applying an external magnetic field. Additionally, we identify Berry curvature quadrupoles in the candidate materials, indicating that our strategy can be generalized to Berry curvature multipole effects. Our work will guide both the theoretical and experimental design of materials with large Berry curvature effects, with significant implications for a wide range of device applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03871 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Berry curvature distributions induced by a nodal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Design of large Berry curvature effects by SNLs or FNSs. (a-c) Nodal structures and Berry curvature distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Workflow for identifying materials with large AHC via theory-driven high-throughput first-principles calculations. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Comparison of AHC values and temperatures between our calculations and literature data. The 60 materials exhibiting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Calculation results for the magnetic material 0.732 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Calculation results for the magnetic material 0.796 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Tuning the AHC of the magnetic material 0.480 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  3. [3]

    Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev

    R. Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 899 (1994)

    1994

  4. [4]

    Ortiz and R

    G. Ortiz and R. M. Martin, Macroscopic polarization as a geo- metric quantum phase: Many-body formulation, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14202 (1994)

    1994

  5. [5]

    Thonhauser, D

    T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Or- bital Magnetization in Periodic Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137205 (2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry Phase Correction to Elec- tron Density of States in Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    J. Shi, G. Vignale, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Quantum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generalization to Interacting Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 197202 (2007). 13

    2007

  8. [8]

    Niu, Towards a quantum pump of electric charges, Phys

    Q. Niu, Towards a quantum pump of electric charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1812 (1990)

    1990

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New Method for High-Accuracy Determination of the Fine-Structure Constant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  2. [10]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Pe- riodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  3. [11]

    Parity Anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the “Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  4. [12]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  5. [13]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  6. [14]

    Jungwirth, Q

    T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207208 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    Onoda and N

    M. Onoda and N. Nagaosa, Topological Nature of Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 19 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry Curvature on the Fermi Surface: Anomalous Hall Effect as a Topological Fermi-Liquid Prop- erty, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect In- duced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal Invariant Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    D. Xiao, Y . Yao, Z. Fang, and Q. Niu, Berry-Phase Effect in Anomalous Thermoelectric Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 026603 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum transport theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165103 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Gao and D

    Y . Gao and D. Xiao, Orbital magnetic quadrupole moment and nonlinear anomalous thermoelectric transport, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060402(R) (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, D. Nishio- Hamane, R. Arita, Y . Otani, and S. Nakatsuji, Large anoma- lous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferro- magnet, Nature Physics 13, 1085 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Sakai, Y

    A. Sakai, Y . P. Mizuta, A. A. Nugroho, R. Sihombing, T. Ko- retsune, M.-T. Suzuki, N. Takemori, R. Ishii, D. Nishio- Hamane, R. Arita, P. Goswami, and S. Nakatsuji, Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum-critical scaling in a fer- romagnetic semimetal, Nature Physics 14, 1...

    2018

  15. [23]

    Yu, Z.-G

    X.-Q. Yu, Z.-G. Zhu, J.-S. You, T. Low, and G. Su, Topological nonlinear anomalous Nernst effect in strained transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201410(R) (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    C. Zeng, S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Nonlin- ear Nernst effect in bilayer WTe 2, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245102 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topo- logical Insulators, Science 329, 61 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y . Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y . Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y . Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effec...

    2013

  19. [27]

    Y . Deng, Y . Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, J. W. Zihan Xu, X. H. Chen, and Y . Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in in- trinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Science 367, 895 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. P. Rusinov, M. Blanco-Rey, M. Hoffmann, A. Y . Vyazovskaya, S. V . Eremeev, A. Ernst, P. M. Echenique, A. Arnau, and E. V . Chulkov, Unique Thickness-Dependent Properties of the van der Waals Interlayer Antiferromagnet MnBi2Te4 Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 10...

    2019

  21. [29]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum theory of the nonlinear Hall effect, Nature Commu- nications 12, 5038 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y . Savrasov, Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    H. Weng, C. Fang, Z. Fang, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Dai, Weyl Semimetal Phase in Noncentrosymmetric Transition- Metal Monophosphides, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    S.-Y . Xu, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, M. Neupane, G. Bian, C. Zhang, R. Sankar, G. Chang, Z. Yuan, C.-C. Lee, S.-M. Huang, H. Zheng, J. Ma, D. S. Sanchez, B. Wang, A. Ban- sil, F. Chou, P. P. Shibayev, H. Lin, S. Jia, and M. Z. Hasan, Discovery of a Weyl fermionsemimetal and ...

    2015

  26. [34]

    E. Liu, Y . Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, S.-Y . Yang, D. Liu, A. Liang, Q. Xu, J. Kroder, V . S ¨uß, H. Bor- rmann, C. Shekhar, Z. Wang, C. Xi, W. Wang, W. Schnelle, S. Wirth, Y . Chen, S. T. B. Goennenwein, and C. Felser, Gi- ant anomalous Hall effect in a fer...

    2018

  27. [35]

    Q. Wang, Y . Xu, R. Lou, Z. Liu, M. Li, Y . Huang, D. Shen, H. Weng, S. Wang, and H. Lei, Large intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in half-metallic ferromagnet Co 3Sn2S2 with magnetic Weyl fermions, Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Band Signa- tures for Strong Nonlinear Hall Effect in Bilayer WTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 266601 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y . Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V . Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, S. Fang, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, E. Kaxi- ras, H.-Z. Lu, H. Lin, L. Fu, N. Gedik, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Observation of the nonlinear Hall...

    2019

  30. [38]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in few-layer WTe 2, Nature Materials 18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    A. A. Burkov, Anomalous Hall Effect in Weyl Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 187202 (2014)

    2014

  32. [41]

    L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, L. Fu, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Massive Dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagomemetal, Nature 555, 638 (2018)

    2018

  33. [42]

    P. Li, J. Koo, W. Ning, J. Li, L. Miao, L. Min, Y . Zhu, Y . Wang, N. Alem, C.-X. Liu, Z. Mao, and B. Yan, Giant room temper- ature anomalous Hall effect and tunable topology in a ferro- magnetic topological semimetal Co2MnAl, Nature Communi- cations 11, 3476 (2020)

    2020

  34. [43]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara1, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinearantiferromagnet at room temper- 14 ature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  35. [44]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y . Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. K ¨ubler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Large anomalous Hall effect driven by anonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinearan- tiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Science Advances...

    2016

  36. [45]

    M. Lee, Y . Onose, Y . Tokura, and N. P. Ong, Hidden con- stant in the anomalous Hall effect of high-purity magnet MnSi, Phys. Rev. B 75, 172403 (2007)

    2007

  37. [46]

    Kanazawa, Y

    N. Kanazawa, Y . Onose, T. Arima, D. Okuyama, K. Ohoyama, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, S. Ishiwata, , and Y . Tokura, Large Topological Hall Effect in a Short-Period Helimagnet MnGe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156603 (2011)

    2011

  38. [47]

    K. Kim, J. Seo, E. Lee, K.-T. Ko, B. S. Kim, B. G. Jang, J. M. Ok, J. Lee, Y . J. Jo, W. Kang, J. H. Shim, C. Kim, H. W. Yeom, B. I. Min, B.-J. Yang, and J. S. Kim, Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal, Natu...

    2018

  39. [48]

    A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Topological nodal semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011)

    2011

  40. [49]

    C. Fang, Y . Chen, H.-Y . Kee, and L. Fu, Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital coupling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 081201(R) (2015)

    2015

  41. [50]

    Liang, J

    Q.-F. Liang, J. Zhou, R. Yu, Z. Wang, and H. Weng, Node- surface and node-line fermions from nonsymmorphic lattice symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085427 (2016)

    2016

  42. [51]

    J. Hu, Z. Tang, J. Liu, X. Liu, Y . Zhu, D. Graf, K. Myhro, S. Tran, C. N. Lau, J. Wei, and Z. Mao, Evidence of Topolog- ical Nodal-Line Fermions in ZrSiSe and ZrSiTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 016602 (2016)

    2016

  43. [52]

    L. Wu, F. Tang, and X. Wan, Exhaustive list of topological hourglass band crossings in 230 space groups, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035106 (2020)

    2020

  44. [53]

    L. Wu, F. Tang, and X. Wan, Symmetry-enforced band nodes in 230 space groups, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045107 (2021)

    2021

  45. [54]

    Tang and X

    F. Tang and X. Wan, Complete classification of band nodal structures and massless excitations, Phys. Rev. B105, 155156 (2022)

    2022

  46. [55]

    Z.-M. Yu, Z. Zhang, G.-B. Liu, W. Wu, X.-P. Li, R.-W. Zhang, S. A. Yang, and Y . Yao, Encyclopedia of emergent particles in three-dimensional crystals, Sci. Bull. 67, 375 (2022)

    2022

  47. [56]

    G.-B. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y . Yao, Sys- tematic investigation of emergent particles in type-III mag- netic space groups, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085117 (2022)

    2022

  48. [57]

    Zhang, G.-B

    Z. Zhang, G.-B. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y . Yao, En- cyclopedia of emergent particles in type-IV magnetic space groups, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104426 (2022)

    2022

  49. [58]

    Chen, H.-Z

    W. Chen, H.-Z. Lu, and J.-M. Hou, Topological semimetals with a double-helix nodal link, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041102(R) (2017)

    2017

  50. [59]

    Z. Yan, R. Bi, H. Shen, L. Lu, S.-C. Zhang, and Z. Wang, Nodal-link semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041103(R) (2017)

    2017

  51. [60]

    Chang, S.-Y

    G. Chang, S.-Y . Xu, X. Zhou, S.-M. Huang, B. Singh, B. Wang, I. Belopolski, J. Yin, S. Zhang, A. Bansil, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Topological Hopf and Chain Link Semimetal States and Their Application to Co 2MnGa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 156401 (2017)

    2017

  52. [61]

    Belopolski, G

    I. Belopolski, G. Chang, T. A. Cochran, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, C. Hugelmeyer, K. Manna, J.-X. Yin, G. Cheng, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, N. Shumiya, S. S. Zhang, C. Shekhar, N. B. M. Schr oter, A. Chikina, C. Polley, B. Thia- garajan, M. Leandersson, J. Adell, S.-M. Huang, N. ...

    2022

  53. [62]

    Ezawa, Topological semimetals carrying arbitrary Hopf numbers: Fermi surface topologies of a Hopf link, Solomon’s knot, trefoil knot, and other linked nodal varieties, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Topological semimetals carrying arbitrary Hopf numbers: Fermi surface topologies of a Hopf link, Solomon’s knot, trefoil knot, and other linked nodal varieties, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041202(R) (2017)

    2017

  54. [63]

    Bzdu ˇsek, Q

    T. Bzdu ˇsek, Q. Wu, A. R ¨uegg, M. Sigrist, and A. A. Soluyanov, Nodal-chain metals, Nature 538, 75 (2016)

    2016

  55. [64]

    Q. Yan, R. Liu, Z. Yan, B. Liu, H. Chen, Z. Wang, and L. Lu, Experimental discovery of nodal chains, Nature Physics 14, 461 (2018)

    2018

  56. [65]

    J.-T. Wang, S. Nie, H. Weng, Y . Kawazoe, and C. Chen, Topo- logical Nodal-Net Semimetal in a Graphene Network Struc- ture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  57. [66]

    Zhong, Y

    C. Zhong, Y . Chen, Y . Xie, S. A. Yang, M. L. Cohen, and S. B. Zhang, Towards three-dimensional Weyl-surface semimetals in graphene networks, Nanoscale 8, 7232 (2016)

    2016

  58. [67]

    Bzdu ˇsek and M

    T. Bzdu ˇsek and M. Sigrist, Robust doubly charged nodal lines and nodal surfaces in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 155105 (2017)

    2017

  59. [68]

    W. Wu, Y . Liu, S. Li, C. Zhong, Z.-M. Yu, X.-L. Sheng, Y . X. Zhao, and S. A. Yang, Nodal surface semimetals: Theory and material realization, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115125 (2018)

    2018

  60. [69]

    M. A. Wilde, M. Dodenh ¨oft, A. Niedermayr, A. Bauer, M. M. Hirschmann, K. Alpin, A. P. Schnyder, and C. Pfleiderer, Symmetry-enforced topological nodal planes at the Fermi sur- face of a chiral magnet, Nature 594, 374 (2021)

    2021

  61. [70]

    Fermi Arcs

    D. Wang, B. Yang, R.-Y . Zhang, W.-J. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, and C. Chan, Straight Photonic Nodal Lines with Quadrupole Berry Curvature Distribution and Superimaging “Fermi Arcs”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 043602 (2022)

    2022

  62. [71]

    P. He, L. Ma, Z. Shi, G. Y . Guo, J.-G. Zheng, Y . Xin, and S. M. Zhou, Chemical Composition Tuning of the Anoma- lous Hall Effect in IsoelectronicL10FePd1−xPtx Alloy Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 066402 (2012)

    2012

  63. [72]

    G. Xing, K. Masuda, T. Tadano, and Y . Miura, Chemical- substitution-driven giant anomalous Hall and Nernst effects inmagnetic cubic Heusler compounds, Acta Materialia 270, 119856 (2024)

    2024

  64. [73]

    R. D. dos Reis, M. G. Zavareh, M. O. Ajeesh, L. O. Kute- lak, A. S. Sukhanov, S. Singh, J. Noky, Y . Sun, J. E. Fischer, K. Manna, C. Felser, and M. Nicklas, Pressure tuning of the anomalous Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 051401 (2020)

    2020

  65. [74]

    Shimizu, K

    S. Shimizu, K. S. Takahashi, T. Hatano, M. Kawasaki, Y . Tokura, and Y . Iwasa, Electrically Tunable Anomalous Hall Effect in Pt Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 216803 (2013)

    2013

  66. [75]

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear Hall effects, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  67. [76]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y . Yanase, Group-theoretical classification of multipole order: Emergent responses and candidate materi- als, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245129 (2018)

    2018

  68. [77]

    Yatsushiro, H

    M. Yatsushiro, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Multipole classi- fication in 122 magnetic point groupsfor unified understanding of multiferroic responses and transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054412 (2021)

    2021

  69. [78]

    Zhang, Z.-G

    Z.-F. Zhang, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, Symmetry dictionary on charge and spin nonlinear responses for all magnetic point groups with nontrivial topological nature, National Science Review 10, nwad104 (2023)

    2023

  70. [79]

    Bradley and A

    C. Bradley and A. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids: Representation Theory for Point Groups and Space Groups (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009)

    2009

  71. [80]

    https://cryst.ehu.es/cgi-bin/subperiodic/ programs/nph-sub_wp. 15

  72. [81]

    Tang and X

    F. Tang and X. Wan, Exhaustive construction of effective mod- els in 1651 magnetic space groups, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085137 (2021)

    2021

  73. [82]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. J. Wieder, Z. Song, Y . Xu, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Magnetic topological quantum chemistry, Na- ture Communications 12, 5965 (2021)

    2021

  74. [83]

    See the Supplemental Material I at XXX for exhaustive tabu- lation of all possible SNLs and FNSs in the 1651 MSGs, both without and with SOC; the symmetry-adapted AHC tensors for all MSGs; and the symmetry-breaking pathways for tun- ing the AHC

  75. [84]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, FINDSYM, ISOTROPY Software Suite, iso.byu.edu, https://iso. byu.edu/iso/isotropy.php

  76. [85]

    H. T. Stokes and D. M. Hatch, Program for Identifying the Space Group Symmetry of a Crystal, J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 237 (2005)

    2005

  77. [86]

    G. C. Moore, M. K. Horton, E. Linscott, A. M. Ganose, M. Siron, D. D. O’Regan, and K. A. Persson, High-throughput determination of Hubbard U and Hund J values for transition metal oxides via the linear response formalism, Phys. Rev. Materials 8, 014409 (2024)

    2024

  78. [87]

    Larson, W

    P. Larson, W. R. L. Lambrecht, A. Chantis, and M. van Schil- fgaarde, Electronic structure of rare-earth nitrides using the LSDA + U approach: Importance of allowing 4f orbitals to break the cubic crystal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045114 (2007)

    2007

  79. [88]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V . Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl ¨ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koret- sune, J. I. nez Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y . Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y . Nohara, Y . No- mura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc ´e, T. Pon...

    2020

  80. [89]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y .-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally- localised Wannier functions, Computer Physics Communica- tions 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  81. [90]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y .-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wan- nier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  82. [91]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, WannierTools : An open-source software package for novel topological materials, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018)

    2018

  83. [92]

    See the Supplemental Material II at XXX for detailed first- principles calculation results on the 75 magnetic materials ex- hibiting large AHC

  84. [93]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  85. [94]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total en- ergy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane- wave basis set, Computational Materials Science6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  86. [95]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  87. [96]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  88. [97]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  89. [98]

    V . Wang, N. Xu, J.-C. Liu, G. Tang, and W.-T. Geng, V ASP- KIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using V ASP code, Computer Physics Communications 267, 108033 (2021)

    2021

  90. [99]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized general- ized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  91. [100]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

    2001

  92. [101]

    S.-X. Li, W. Wang, S. Xu, T. Li, Z. Li, J. Wang, J.-J. Mi, Q. Tao, F. Tang, X. Wan, and Z.-A. Xu, Giant Anomalous Hall Effect in Kagome Nodal Surface Semimetal Fe3Ge, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15424 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.