Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

A kinetic model for polyatomic gas with quasi-resonant collisions leading to bi-temperature relaxation processes

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper's central claim is that slightly imperfect resonant collisions produce a polyatomic Boltzmann dynamics whose distribution stays close to a two-temperature Maxwellian while the two temperatures relax toward each other according…

desk verdict A solid model-building paper with a clean local Landau–Teller computation, but the advertised two-phase relaxation claim is an extrapolation, not a theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03878 v1 pith:SEKDS5AN submitted 2025-06-04 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Thomas Borsoni (LJLL (UMR_7598)) , Laurent Boudin (REO , LJLL) , Julien Mathiaud (IRMAR , UR) , Francesco Salvarani (CEREMADE) This is my paper
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 82C4076P0535Q20
keywords Boltzmannequationpolyatomicgasquasi-resonantcollisionsresonantLandau–Tellerequationstwo-temperatureMaxwellianH-theoremDSMC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a Boltzmann description of a polyatomic gas in which collisions are almost, but not exactly, resonant: kinetic and internal energy are separately conserved only up to a small parameter $\varepsilon$. It establishes that for each fixed $\varepsilon>0$ the model obeys an H-theorem with the usual single-temperature Maxwellian equilibria, and that as $\varepsilon\to 0$ the collision operator converges to the resonant model whose equilibria have two distinct temperatures. The central computation gives the initial rate at which the internal temperature changes when the gas starts from a two-temperature Maxwellian: $\frac{dT_i}{dt}$ at time $0$ is $\varepsilon^2$ times an explicit function of the kinetic and internal temperatures times their difference, plus $o(\varepsilon^2)$. From this the paper derives a Landau–Teller-type ODE system for the slow equalization of the two temperatures and argues that the dynamics has a two-phase structure: fast approach to a two-temperature Maxwellian, then slow relaxation toward a single-temperature equilibrium. A DSMC simulation for one parameter set matches the ODE prediction.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a cut-off function $\chi_\varepsilon(R,R')=\frac{c_\eta(R,R')}{2\varepsilon}\mathbf{1}_{|\eta(R)-\eta(R')|\le\varepsilon}$ inserted into a reference Boltzmann kernel, where $R$ is the fraction of collision energy remaining kinetic after the collision and $\eta$ maps $(0,1)$ diffeomorphically onto $\mathbb{R}$. For the explicit computation $\eta(R)=\log\bigl(\frac{R}{1-R}\bigr)$, and the diagonal normalising condition $c_\eta(R,R)=\eta'(R)$ ensures that as $\varepsilon\to 0$ the kernel converges to the resonant kernel with the corrected internal-energy measure. Lemma 2, a second-order Taylor expansion of the truncated integral, converts the $\varepsilon$-width of the resonance strip into the explicit $\varepsilon^2$ prefactor appearing in Proposition 3.

What would settle it

Simulate the homogeneous equation with a different parameter set (for instance $\delta=4$ or $\kappa_i=0$) at $\varepsilon=0.05$ and compare the DSMC internal temperature with the solution of the ODE system (46)--(48): if the curves separate on the $\varepsilon^{-2}$ timescale, or if the relative error does not shrink as $\varepsilon$ decreases, the extrapolation fails. Beginning from a non-Maxwellian initial condition and measuring the time to reach a two-temperature Maxwellian versus the temperature equalization time would similarly test the two-phase picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a small regularisation of resonant collisions produces a Boltzmann dynamics that stays close to a two-temperature Maxwellian while the two temperatures slowly relax toward each other. Concretely, Proposition 3 proves that for the homogeneous quasi-resonant Boltzmann equation with kernel (32)--(36) and a two-temperature Maxwellian initial condition, the initial internal-temperature derivative is $$ \left.\frac{dT_i}{dt}\right|_{t=0} =\$varepsilon^{2}$ \rho\, C_{\delta,\kappa_k,\kappa_i}\, \bigl($T_k^{0}$\bigr)^{2\kappa_k+1/2}\, \bigl($T_i^{0}$\bigr)^{2\kappa_i+\delta}\, \bigl($T_k^{0}$-$T_i^{0}$\bigr)+o(\$varepsilon^{2}$), $$ with an explicit constant $C_{\delta,\kappa_k,\kappa_i}$. The paper then extrapolates this local computation to all times, postulating that the temperatures solve $\dot T_i=\varepsilon^2\rho C_{\delta,\kappa_k,\kappa_i} T_k^{2\kappa_k+1/2} T_i^{2\kappa_i+\delta}(T_k-T_i)$ together with $\frac{3}{2}\dot T_k+\frac{\delta}{2}\dot T_i=0$, and verifies this statement numerically.

Load-bearing premise

The long-time conclusion rests on the assumed, not proven, claim that the solution stays close to a two-temperature Maxwellian on the relaxation timescale, so the exact $t=0$ derivative formula remains valid at all later times; the paper states this as an expectation and checks it numerically for one parameter set.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For fixed $\varepsilon>0$ the quasi-resonant equation has the usual single-temperature Maxwellian equilibria, because its collision invariants are the standard ones.
  • The explicit prefactor yields the Landau–Teller system (46)--(48), whose energy balance ties the kinetic and internal temperatures together.
  • In the limit $\varepsilon\to 0$ the operator recovers the resonant collision kernel with the corrected measure $\varphi(I')\varphi(I+I_*-I')\,dI'$.
  • The DSMC simulation tracks the ODE solution, and the average relative $L^2$ error decreases as $\varepsilon$ decreases, fitted as $\varepsilon^{5/3}$ over the tested range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-temperature-Maxwellian closure holds broadly, the full kinetic equation is replaceable by a two-ODE temperature model during the slow phase, which would make transport computations such as bulk viscosity and sound dispersion directly tractable.
  • The same construction can be adapted to mixtures or to other internal-energy laws $\varphi$, yielding explicit, parameter-dependent Landau–Teller rates that could be fitted to ab initio collision data.
  • The fitted $\varepsilon^{5/3}$ convergence order is probably a finite-$\varepsilon$/DSMC artifact, since symmetry removes the $\varepsilon^3$ term; an $\varepsilon^4$ next-order expansion would settle the asymptotic rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a polyatomic Boltzmann model with quasi-resonant collisions, obtained by truncating a reference collision kernel with a cutoff function χε that enforces near-resonance in the ratio of kinetic to internal energies. For fixed ε>0, the authors prove (formally) an H-theorem showing that equilibria are single-temperature Maxwellians, and they show that as ε→0 the quasi-resonant kernel converges to a resonant kernel with two-temperature Maxwellian equilibria. The main analytical result is Proposition 3, which computes the initial time derivative of the internal temperature for a two-temperature Maxwellian initial datum, obtaining an explicit ε²-scaled Landau–Teller-type expression with a coefficient Cδ,κk,κi. Based on this local computation and a heuristic two-phase picture, the authors conjecture and numerically test that solutions remain close to a two-temperature Maxwellian manifold for times of order ε⁻², with temperatures governed by the ODE system (46)–(48). Numerical DSMC simulations for one parameter set (ε=0.1, δ=2, κk=1/2, κi=−1/2, Tk⁰=1, Ti⁰=50) show agreement between the DSMC internal temperature and the ODE prediction, and an ε-scaling experiment suggests the relative error decays like ε^{5/3}.

Significance. If the global two-phase relaxation picture were rigorously established, the model would provide a useful bridge between resonant and non-resonant polyatomic Boltzmann dynamics, with an explicit, parameter-free derivation of the Landau–Teller coefficient from the collision kernel. The local derivative computation in Proposition 3 is a concrete, non-circular calculation that could serve as a benchmark for reduced models. The H-theorem and the resonant asymptotics in Proposition 2 are coherent, though standard. However, the paper's central advertised claim—that the distribution is at all times close to a two-temperature Maxwellian—is not proved; it rests on an extrapolation from a t=0 computation and on a single numerical experiment. The numerical evidence compares only a temperature moment, not the distribution itself, and lacks error bars and reproducibility details. The value of the paper therefore lies more in the model formulation and the local asymptotic computation than in the global dynamical statement, which should be reframed as a conjecture or supported by further analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (45)] The global two-phase relaxation claim is not established. Proposition 3 computes only dTi/dt at t=0 for a two-temperature Maxwellian initial datum, and the ODE system (46)–(48) is introduced by the phrase "one can extrapolate" after a heuristic discussion ("we expect", "we anticipate"). No estimate is given showing that a solution f(t) stays close to the two-temperature Maxwellian manifold on the timescale ε⁻². Since Theorem 1 shows the only equilibrium is the single-temperature Maxwellian, the two-temperature manifold is not invariant, and a singular-perturbation or invariant-manifold argument is needed. Without such an argument, the abstract's claim of "the first rigorous framework of a Boltzmann dynamics for which the distribution is at all times close to a multi-temperature Maxwellian" is unsupported. The authors should either prove a persistence estimate (e.g., a stability bound near the manifold) or explicitly restate the global behaviour as a conjecture.
  2. [Section 4, Figures 3 and 4] The numerical validation is insufficient to certify the distribution-level claim. The comparison in Figure 3 involves only the internal temperature Ti(t) from a single DSMC run with 10⁵ particles and one parameter set; no error bars, statistical uncertainty, or code are provided. Agreement of a single moment does not imply that the distribution remains close to the two-temperature Maxwellian family. Remark 3 checks the fast approach from non-Maxwellian initial data, but not persistence over the relaxation timescale. To support the global claim, the authors should measure a distribution-level distance (e.g., relative entropy, L² distance, or a Wasserstein distance to the two-temperature Maxwellian family) over the whole time interval and for several values of ε, ideally with multiple independent runs to quantify stochastic error.
  3. [Sections 2.2 and 3, Eq. (30)] No well-posedness result is stated for the homogeneous quasi-resonant Boltzmann equation (30). The H-theorem (Theorem 1) is only formal ("at least formally"), and Proposition 3 uses the solution f and its temperature derivative at t=0 without specifying the function space or the regularity assumptions under which (38) holds. Since the abstract promises a "rigorous framework", the absence of an existence/uniqueness theorem (or at minimum a precise statement of the formal setting) is a load-bearing gap. The authors should either provide a well-posedness theorem for the kernel class in (31)–(36) or clearly restrict the claims to formal asymptotics.
  4. [Section 3, Proposition 3 assumptions] The explicit Landau–Teller coefficient is derived under the specific choices φ(I)=I^{δ/2−1}, η(R)=log(R/(1−R)), and γ=δ+1. This is legitimate, but the statement does not specify the ranges of the parameters κk and κi for which the gamma functions in Cδ,κk,κi are well-defined and the integral in the derivation converges. For example, the terms m_{2κk+1/2} and m_{2κi+δ+1} require certain lower bounds on the exponents. The authors should state the parameter restrictions needed for the computation to be valid, and discuss whether these restrictions are satisfied by the physically motivated examples.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, first paragraph] The reference to "Proposition 2.3" in the first paragraph of Section 3 should be "Proposition 2"; the proposition is not numbered 2.3 in the text.
  2. [Section 4.1, Remark 3] The name "Henze-Zikler" in Remark 3 is misspelled; the reference [18] is by Henze and Zirkler.
  3. [Section 4.2] In the text, references to "Subfigure 4a" and "Subfigure 4b" are used, but Figure 4 has no subfigure labels; please label the panels or adjust the references.
  4. [Section 4.1] The numerical experiment uses DSMC with 10⁵ particles but no information is given about the random seed, number of independent runs, or variance of the results; adding this information would improve reproducibility.
  5. [Section 4.2] The power-law fit in Figure 4b reports an exponent of approximately 1.66, close to 5/3, but the authors correctly refrain from drawing a definite conclusion; still, the plot would benefit from error bars on the L2-error estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Landau–Teller coefficient is computed directly from the defined quasi-resonant kernel with no fitted parameter, and the unproved two-phase ansatz is a correctness gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central local result, Proposition 3, is a direct computation: the paper expands the weak form of the quasi-resonant collision operator with the explicit kernel (32) and truncation (10), applies the Taylor lemma (Lemma 2), and obtains dTi/dt at t=0 in terms of the kernel constants and Gamma functions. No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted, and the coefficient C_delta,kappa_k,kappa_i is not chosen to match any simulation or prior Landau-Teller output; it is derived from the kernel definition. The paper does rely on the self-cited resonant model [11] for the characterization of resonant collision invariants in Proposition 4 and the corrected resonant measure [10] in Proposition 2, but those are separate published results with stated assumptions, and the local Landau-Teller computation does not presuppose them. The abstract's stronger claim that the distribution remains close to a two-temperature Maxwellian at all times is explicitly introduced as an expectation and extrapolation, not as a theorem: Section 3 says "we expect", "we anticipate", and equation (45) is introduced with "one can extrapolate that". This is a lack of proof of the global closure, not a circular derivation, because the ODE system (46)-(48) is not used to construct the kernel or to compute the initial derivative; it is a proposed extension whose numerical check is independent of the derivation. The numerical section compares DSMC temperatures with the ODE solution for a single parameter set and fits a power law only for the error trend, which is not presented as a prediction derived from the model. Therefore no identified step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the paper is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model itself carries several hand-chosen ingredients (CB, delta, kappa_k, kappa_i, gamma, eta, c_eta); they are model inputs, not fitted parameters, and the qualitative Landau-Teller structure does not depend on their values. The heavier assumptions are the unproved existence of solutions and the two-temperature Maxwellian closure used for the global claim.

free parameters (7)
  • CB = CB=2 in simulations
    Dimensional constant in reference kernel (32); arbitrary model input not fitted to data.
  • delta (internal degrees of freedom) = delta=2 in simulations
    Exponent in energy-law density phi(I)=I^(delta/2-1); model input.
  • kappa_k = kappa_k=1/2 in simulations
    Exponent of kinetic energy in reference kernel (32); model input.
  • kappa_i = kappa_i=-1/2 in simulations
    Exponent of internal energy in reference kernel (32); model input.
  • gamma = gamma=delta+1
    Imposed in Proposition 3 to cancel the E^(gamma-delta-1) factor; without this choice the Landau-Teller form is not obtained.
  • eta = eta(R)=log(R/(1-R))
    Diffeomorphism used in the truncation (10); determines the coefficient through eta-prime.
  • c_eta = sqrt(eta'(R)eta'(R')) in numerics
    Normalization factor constrained by (11)-(12); only diagonal values matter in the epsilon to 0 limit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Reference kernel B satisfies symmetry (6), micro-reversibility (7), and positivity (8).
    Used to define B_epsilon and to derive the weak form and H-theorem.
  • standard math Resonant collision invariants are characterized as in [11, Lemma 3].
    Imported in Appendix A to start the quasi-resonant invariant proof; not reproduced in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a sufficiently regular solution f to the homogeneous equation (30).
    Proposition 3 differentiates dTi/dt along f; no existence or uniqueness theorem is stated.
  • ad hoc to paper The dynamics remain close to a two-temperature Maxwellian for all times.
    Equation (45) extrapolates the local ODE to all times from this unproved closure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A kinetic model for polyatomic gas with quasi-resonant collisions leading to bi-temperature relaxation processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SEKDS5AN

@misc{pith2026250603878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A kinetic model for polyatomic gas with quasi-resonant collisions leading to bi-temperature relaxation processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SEKDS5AN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03878}
}
read the original abstract

In this article, we extend the Boltzmann framework for polyatomic gases by introducing quasi-resonant kernels, which relax resonant interactions, for which kinetic and internal energies are separately conserved and lead to equilibrium states with two temperatures. We establish an H-theorem and analyze the quasi-resonant model's asymptotic behaviour, demonstrating a two-phase relaxation process: an initial convergence towards a two-temperature Maxwellian state followed by gradual relaxation of the two temperatures towards each other. Numerical simulations validate our theoretical predictions. The notion of quasi-resonance provides the first rigorous framework of a Boltzmann dynamics for which the distribution is at all times close to a multi-temperature Maxwellian, relaxing towards a one-temperature Maxwellian.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03878 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Standard, resonant and quasi-resonant manifolds of allowed collision quadru￾plets in (R 3 × R+) 4 . Reference collision kernel. We introduce B := B(v, v∗, I, I∗, I′ , I′ ∗ , σ) ≥ 0 a reference polyatomic collision kernel, in the sense that it satisfies, for almost every v, v∗ ∈ R 3 , I, I∗, I ′ , I ′ ∗ ∈ R+, σ ∈ S 2 , a symmetry property (6) B(v, v∗, I, I∗, I′ , I′ ∗ , σ) = B(v∗, v, I∗, I, I′ ∗ , I′ , −σ), a micro-r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Expected behaviour of the quasi-resonant dynamics. This behaviour differs from the dynamics of the non-resonant polyatomic case and is a specific feature of the present model. In particular, we deduce a pair of coupled ordinary differential equations on both kinetic and internal temperatures, of Landau–Teller type, see for instance [29]. Let us now obtain explicit formulas, at the lowest non-zero order of approximat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the internal temperatures Ti and Ti obtained respectively by DSMC simulation and by solving the Landau–Teller ODE system, with ε = 10−1 . These result support, at least for our chosen set of parameters, the statements of Section 3: the kinetic and interna…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Result of the numerical experiment to study the behavior of the average L 2 -error between Ti and Ti relatively to ε [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Boudin, A

    L. Boudin, A. Rossi, and F. Salvarani. A kinetic model of polyatomic gas with resonant collisions.Ric. Mat., 73(5):2411– 2424, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    R. J. Alonso, M. ˇColi´ c, and I. M. Gamba. The Cauchy problem for Boltzmann bi-linear systems: the mixing of monatomic and polyatomic gases. J. Stat. Phys., 191(1):Paper No. 9, 50 pp., 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Andries, P

    P. Andries, P. Le Tallec, J.-P. Perlat, and B. Perthame. The Gaussian-BGK model of Boltzmann equation with small Prandtl number. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids, 19(6):813–830, 2000

    work page 2000

  4. [3]

    K. Aoki, M. Bisi, M. Groppi, and S. Kosuge. Two-temperature Navier-Stokes equations for a polyatomic gas derived from kinetic theory. Phys. Rev. E, 102(2):023104, 23 pp., 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [4]

    K. Aoki, M. Bisi, M. Groppi, and S. Kosuge. A note on the steady Navier–Stokes equations derived from an ES-BGK model for a polyatomic gas. Fluids, 6(1):22 pp., 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    G. Bird. The DSMC Method. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    M. Bisi, T. Borsoni, and M. Groppi. On the modelling of polyatomic molecules in kinetic theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18207, 2025

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [7]

    Borgnakke and P

    C. Borgnakke and P. S. Larsen. Statistical collision model for Monte Carlo simulation of polyatomic gas mixture. J. Comput. Phys., 18(4):405–420, 1975

    work page 1975

Show all 37 references
  1. [8]

    Borsoni, M

    T. Borsoni, M. Bisi, and M. Groppi. A general framework for the kinetic modelling of polyatomic gases. Commun. Math. Phys., 393(1):215–266, 2022

    2022

  2. [9]

    Borsoni, L

    T. Borsoni, L. Boudin, and F. Salvarani. Compactness property of the linearized Boltzmann operator for a polyatomic gas undergoing resonant collisions. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 517(1):Paper No. 126579, 30 pp., 2023

    2023

  3. [10]

    Compactness property of the linearized Boltzmann operator for a polyatomic gas undergoing resonant collisions

    T. Borsoni, L. Boudin, and F. Salvarani. Corrigendum to “Compactness property of the linearized Boltzmann operator for a polyatomic gas undergoing resonant collisions” [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 517 (1) (2023) 126579]. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 538(2):Paper No. 128493, 3 pp., 2024

    2023

  4. [12]

    Bourgat, L

    J.-F. Bourgat, L. Desvillettes, P. Le Tallec, and B. Perthame. Microreversible collisions for polyatomic gases and Boltzmann’s theorem. European J. Mech. B Fluids, 13(2):237–254, 1994

    1994

  5. [13]

    D. M. Brenner. Near resonant vibration → vibration energy transfer under single collision conditions. J. Chem. Phys., 74(1):494–507, 1981

    1981

  6. [14]

    M. B. Brown and A. B. Forsythe. Robust tests for the equality of variances. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 69(346):364–367, 1974

    1974

  7. [15]

    Desvillettes

    L. Desvillettes. Sur un mod` ele de type Borgnakke-Larsen conduisant ` a des lois d’´ energie non lin´ eaires en temp´ erature pour les gaz parfaits polyatomiques. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6), 6(2):257–262, 1997

    1997

  8. [16]

    Desvillettes, R

    L. Desvillettes, R. Monaco, and F. Salvarani. A kinetic model allowing to obtain the energy law of polytropic gases in the presence of chemical reactions. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids, 24(2):219–236, 2005

    2005

  9. [17]

    I. M. Gamba and M. Pavi´ c- ˇColi´ c. On the Cauchy problem for Boltzmann equation modeling a polyatomic gas. J. Math. Phys., 64(1):Paper No. 013303, 51 pp., 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Henze and B

    N. Henze and B. Zirkler. A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 19(10):3595–3617, 1990

    1990

  11. [19]

    L. H. Holway. New statistical models for kinetic theory: methods of construction. Phys. Fluids, 9(9):1658–1673, 1966

    1966

  12. [20]

    Kosuge and K

    S. Kosuge and K. Aoki. Shock-wave structure for a polyatomic gas with large bulk viscosity. Phys. Rev. Fluids, 3:023401, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Kosuge and K

    S. Kosuge and K. Aoki. Navier-Stokes equations and bulk viscosity for a polyatomic gas with temperature-dependent specific heats. Fluids, 8(1):22 pp., 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Kosuge, H.-W

    S. Kosuge, H.-W. Kuo, and K. Aoki. A kinetic model for a polyatomic gas with temperature-dependent specific heats and its application to shock-wave structure. J. Stat. Phys., 177(2):209–251, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Lanza, Y

    M. Lanza, Y. Kalugina, L. Wiesenfeld, and F. Lique. Near-resonant rotational energy transfer in HCl–H2 inelastic collisions. J. Chem. Phys., 140(6), 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Lombardi, N

    A. Lombardi, N. Faginas-Lago, L. Pacifici, and G. Grossi. Energy transfer upon collision of selectively excited CO 2 molecules: State-to-state cross sections and probabilities for modeling of atmospheres and gaseous flows. J. Chem. Phys., 143(3):034307, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    B. H. Mahan. Resonant transfer of vibrational energy in molecular collisions. J. Chem. Phys., 46(1):98–101, 1967

    1967

  18. [26]

    T. Morse. Kinetic model for gases with internal degrees of freedom. Phys. Fluids, 7(2):159–169, 1964. 18 T. BORSONI, L. BOUDIN, J. MATHIAUD, AND F. SAL V ARANI

    1964

  19. [27]

    Nagnibeda and E

    E. Nagnibeda and E. Kustova. Non-equilibrium reacting gas flows. Heat and Mass Transfer. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,

  20. [28]

    E. Nikitin. Resonance and non-resonance intermolecular energy exchange in molecular collisions. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 33:14–21, 1962

    1962

  21. [29]

    E. E. Nikitin and J. Troe. 70 years of Landau–Teller theory for collisional energy transfer. Semiclassical three- dimensional generalizations of the classical collinear model. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10(11):1483–1501, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Ross and P

    J. Ross and P. Mazur. Some deductions from a formal statistical mechanical theory of chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys., 35(1):19–28, 1961

    1961

  23. [31]

    V. A. Rykov. A model kinetic equation for a gas with rotational degrees of freedom. Fluid Dyn., 10(6):959–966, 1975

    1975

  24. [32]

    R. Sharma. Near-resonant vibrational energy transfer among isotopes of C O 2. Phys. Rev., 177(1):102, 1969

    1969

  25. [33]

    R. D. Sharma. Near-resonant vibration-to-vibration energy transfer in the NO+–N2 collisions. J. Chem. Phys., 125(11), 2006

    2006

  26. [34]

    J. C. Stephenson and C. B. Moore. Temperature dependence of nearly resonant vibration → vibration energy transfer in CO2 mixtures. J. Chem. Phys., 56(3):1295–1308, 1972

    1972

  27. [35]

    N. Taxman. Classical theory of transport phenomena in dilute polyatomic gases. Phys. Rev., 110(6):1235, 1958

    1958

  28. [36]

    F. Casorati

    C. S. Wang Chang and G. E. Uhlenbeck. Transport phenomena in polyatomic gases. Technical report, University of Michigan, 1951. T.B.: CERMICS, ´Ecole des Ponts et Chauss ´ees - Institut Polytechnique de Paris & Inria Saclay, France & Sorbonne Universit ´e, Universit ´e Paris Ci...

    1951

  29. [2009]

    Kinetic theory of transport and relaxation processes, Translated from the 2003 Russian original

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.