Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Experimental and simulative study on laser irradiation of 3D-printed micro-structures at intensities relevant for inertial confinement fusion

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read 3D-printed micro-structured foams, resolved cell-by-cell in 3D simulations, erode at speeds set by geometric laser scattering into the structure's through holes, with two-plasmon decay active during irradiation.

desk verdict A solid first dataset on 3D-printed log-pile targets at ICF intensities, but the scattering-mechanism claim rests on a looser agreement than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04017 v1 pith:WDQZXSPS submitted 2025-06-04 physics.plasm-ph physics.comp-ph

M. Cipriani , F. Consoli , M. Scisciò , A. Solovjovas , I. A. Petsi , M. Malinauskas , P. Andreoli , G. Cristofari
show 2 more authors
E. Di Ferdinando G. Di Giorgio
This is my paper
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords laser-plasmainteraction3D-printedfoamtwo-photonpolymerizationinertialconfinementfusionerosionwavelaserscatteringtwo-plasmondecayradiation-hydrodynamicssimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using two-photon 3D printing, the authors built log-pile micro-structured foams with precisely known geometry and irradiated them with a high-power laser at intensities relevant for inertial confinement fusion (about $10^{14}$ to 7×$10^{14}$ W/$cm^{2}$). They then ran 3D radiation-hydrodynamics simulations that resolve the printed filaments one-to-one on the computational grid. The central result is that the simulated time for the laser to fully ablate the structure agrees with the measured breakout time of the erosion wave, and that the dominant mechanism is geometric: when the focal-spot center falls on a through hole of the log-pile, the focused beam scatters into the gaps between filaments, heating the material volumetrically and eroding it faster than when it hits a filament crossing. Measured erosion speeds (about 25–29 µm/ns) sit inside the simulated range and closer to the through-hole cases, and the reflected/transmitted light signals are consistent with strong internal scattering. The 2λ/3 emission observed at 703 nm shows that two-plasmon decay is active during the interaction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the printed log-pile itself: layers of polymer filaments roughly 14 µm thick with about 39 µm separation, forming a regular lattice of through holes, printed from a Si/Zr hybrid pre-polymer at an average density of 348 mg/$cm^{3}$. The simulation places this exact geometry on a static ~1 µm Eulerian mesh and tracks the laser with 3D ray tracing, so the printed architecture acts as a built-in optical element. When the f/1 focusing cone aligns with a through hole, a portion of the beam enters the gaps obliquely, scatters into the structure, and deposits energy volumetrically, creating low-density channels that refract later rays and leave dense filament remnants that can seed instabilities. Because the homogenization of the plasma is never completed in these coarse structures, the paper describes the ablation front as an 'erosion wave' rather than a shock, and defines breakout time as the moment the rear-side filaments move out by one layer distance.

What would settle it

One decisive check would be to publish the comparison run with radiation transport included and show whether the erosion speed shifts outside the existing C–H simulation band; another would be to image the rear-side breakout with a fast, space-resolved diagnostic and verify that the density-based breakout point used in the simulations coincides with the observed self-emission front.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a 3D radiation-hydrodynamics simulation that resolves the printed microstructure directly can reproduce the experimentally measured ablation time, and that the physics controlling that time is scattering of the focused laser into the structure's through holes rather than simple surface absorption. In the simulations, pointing the focal-spot center on a through hole (the 'H' cases) produces strong scattering into the inter-filament channels, volumetric heating, and an irregular erosion front, with breakout times of 6.4 ns (50 µm spot) and 8.2 ns (100 µm spot); pointing on a filament crossing (the 'C' cases) scatters less and gives breakout times around 9.3–9.4 ns. The measured average speeds, 27±8 µm/ns at the higher intensity and about 25 µm/ns at the lower one, fall within the simulated C–H band and lie closer to the H cases, indicating that with random beam pointing the scattering-dominated behavior is the typical outcome. The experiment also found negligible transmitted light and strongly shot-to-shot variable reflected light, consistent with the simulations' picture of light being scattered and diffused inside the structure, and a clear though variable emission feature at 2λ/3, which is the signature of two-plasmon decay.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the assumption that the blurred self-emission front measured in the streak images marks the same material boundary as the simulation's breakout criterion, and that omitting radiation transport from the simulations does not change the erosion speed; if either fails, the claimed agreement is not decisive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the erosion speed of a printed foam is not fixed by its average density alone: the relative position of the focal spot and the printed lattice is a first-order control, so pointing tolerance becomes a design variable.
  • The paper's expectation is that reducing filament thickness and inter-filament spacing will turn the erosion wave into a more uniform, shock-like front, which would make finer printed foams behave more like conventional chemical foams.
  • The observed two-plasmon decay implies that printed micro-structures can seed laser-plasma instabilities through scattering-induced density inhomogeneities even at average intensities around 10^14 W/cm^2.
  • One-to-one resolved simulation of printed targets is a viable alternative to sub-grid models in resolvable regimes, enabling morphology-by-morphology studies of foam performance.
  • Because the reflected-light signal is not reproducible shot to shot while the erosion speed is, the erosion-wave speed is the robust observable for validating models of structured targets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable design rule follows that the paper leaves implicit: rotating the log-pile so no through hole aligns with the beam axis, or deliberately staggering the lattice, should suppress the fast-erosion channels and smooth the ablation front.
  • Since the ±8 µm/ns measurement error is comparable to the whole C–H spread in simulated speeds, a faster time-resolved diagnostic or a second imaging axis could identify which pointing case occurred on each shot, tightening the comparison.
  • The strong TPD signature suggests local hot spots inside the scattered channels may exceed the TPD threshold even when the average intensity is below it; this could be tested by fixing average intensity and varying focal spot size while watching the 703 nm line.
  • For fusion applications, the coherent channeling seen here argues for introducing controlled disorder or rotation in printed foams, the opposite of the precise regularity that makes them attractive for simulation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental campaign at the ABC laser facility in which 3D-printed log-pile micro-structures are irradiated at ICF-relevant intensities (10^14–10^15 W/cm^2). The authors measure the erosion-wave speed from side-on streak self-emission, record reflected/transmitted laser light with photodiodes, and detect 2ω_p/3 (two-plasmon decay) emission. They perform direct 3D FLASH radiation-hydrodynamics simulations that resolve the printed filament structure, considering two focal spot sizes (50 and 100 µm) and two extreme pointing positions (center on filament crossing, C; center on through hole, H). The simulations show strong laser scattering into the structure for the H cases and predict breakout times/speeds. The measured erosion speeds are compared with the bracketing ranges from the four simulations and are interpreted as closer to the H cases, supporting the claim that geometric scattering controls erosion and seeds two-plasmon decay.

Significance. If the central agreement claim holds, the paper makes a valuable contribution: it demonstrates that additively manufactured, ordered micro-structures can be simulated with explicitly resolved morphology in a full 3D radiation-hydrodynamics code, avoiding sub-grid foam models, and it identifies scattering into the structure as a mechanism that accelerates erosion and can seed two-plasmon decay. Strengths of the work include the absence of fitted parameters: the simulations use measured structural parameters (filament thickness 14.1 µm, spacing 39.2 µm, material density 1.2 g/cm^3) and published opacities, and the experimental comparison is explicitly used as a consistency check rather than as model input. The experimental campaign is also one of the few on 3D-printed foams at these intensities. However, the quantitative support for the scattering mechanism is weaker than the abstract implies, and the current level of agreement does not yet convincingly discriminate between the C and H scenarios.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V.A, Table I, Figure 8] The central claim that scattering controls the erosion speed rests on a bracketing argument with only two extreme pointing cases. The measured low-intensity speed, 25 µm/ns, falls above the simulated C–H range for the 100 µm spot (21.3–24.4 µm/ns), while the high-intensity speed, 29 µm/ns, falls within the rather wide 50 µm range (21.5–31.3 µm/ns). With no simulations at intermediate offsets and no measured shot-to-shot pointing, the statement that the data are 'closer to H' is not a quantitative test: any speed between the C and H limits would be classified as consistent, and the low-intensity point is actually outside the bracketing range. To support the scattering hypothesis, the authors should either simulate intermediate pointing positions or provide a quantitative metric (e.g., a likelihood or uncertainty-weighted comparison) that accounts for the unknown pointing distribution. As it stands, the agreement is too loose to distinguish the proposed mechanism from a scenario in which the average of random pointings is simply bracketed by the two extremes.
  2. [Section IV, radiation transport comparison] The authors state that a simulation with radiation transport was compared with one without it, and that the differences in erosion-wave speed were 'very small,' but this comparison is not shown nor quantified. Since the target contains Si and Zr (15% and 20% by mass) and radiation can materially affect ablation and energy transport in such materials, this omitted comparison is load-bearing for the reliability of the simulated speeds. Please include at least the time history of the erosion-front position for the two simulations, or a numerical bound on the difference, so the reader can assess whether the neglect of radiation shifts the predicted speeds within or outside the experimental error bars.
  3. [Section IV vs. Section V.A, breakout criteria] The simulated breakout time is defined by a specific density criterion (maximum of the average density along a line at z = 370 µm), while the experimental breakout time is defined by the intersection of the rear-side target position with the edge of the plasma self-emission in the streak image. The equivalence of these two diagnostics is not established. Given the ±8 µm/ns uncertainty in the experimental speed and the irregular, non-planar erosion front seen in the simulations, the authors should justify that the density-based criterion tracks the same physical boundary as the self-emission front, or show how the simulated breakout time changes under alternative reasonable criteria. Without this, the claimed 'good agreement' may be partly an artifact of two different definitions of breakout.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'we present the results an experimental campaign' is missing the preposition 'of'.
  2. [Section IV] In the paragraph describing the density evolution, the phrase 'In these cases cases' contains a duplicated word.
  3. [Section IV] The word 'sufficently' should be 'sufficiently'.
  4. [Figure 8] The vertical axis label reads 'shock wave speeds,' but the paper carefully argues that no shock wave develops and that the observable is an erosion wave. The label should be consistent with the terminology used in the text.
  5. [Section V.B] The authors state that the negligible transmitted signal is 'consistent with the high average density of the sample and with the simulations,' but the simulations also show strong scattering into the structure and later mention 'a fraction of the laser energy being loss through transmission.' This apparent tension between scattering-induced transmission losses and the observed negligible transmitted signal is not discussed; a brief clarification would help.
  6. [Section V.C] The two-plasmon decay observation is only qualitative, and the authors correctly note that the signal amplitude cannot be quantified because of the side-viewing geometry and potential target tilting. It would strengthen the paper to state explicitly whether the TPD signal was present in all high-intensity shots or only a subset, and whether it correlates with the erosion speed or the reflected-light behavior.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FLASH simulations are parameter-free with respect to the measured erosion speeds, so the experiment-simulation agreement is an independent consistency check.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that 3D FLASH simulations of a directly resolved log-pile structure predict strong laser scattering and erosion speeds that bracket the measured values. The simulation inputs are the measured structure dimensions (14.1 um filament thickness, 39.2 um separation, 1.2 g/cm3 filament density), the ABC laser pulse parameters, and standard FLASH physics with TOPS opacities; none of these is tuned to the experimental erosion speeds or reflectivity signals. The simulated breakout criterion (maximum average density at the rear-side line, Table I) is defined independently of the experimental streak analysis (intersection of rear-side edge with plasma self-emission, Fig. 7). Thus the agreement in Fig. 8 is a genuine external consistency check, not a fitted prediction. The only self-citation, Ref. 30 for the streak-analysis strategy, is not load-bearing because the procedure is fully described in the text. The unshown radiation-transport comparison and the reliance on two extreme-pointing simulations to bracket the data are evidentiary limitations, but they do not reduce the simulation output to its input. No circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted free parameters were identified; the simulation inputs are measured structural parameters and published opacity/EoS data. The central claims rest on modeling choices typical of radiation-hydrodynamics, most notably the neglect of radiation transport and the reliance on geometrical ray tracing to reproduce the scattering that is the paper's main finding.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The plasma can be described by single-fluid radiation-hydrodynamics with tabulated equations of state and opacities; kinetic plasma effects (two-plasmon decay, Langmuir waves) are not modeled.
    FLASH solves fluid equations; the paper observes TPD experimentally but does not include it in simulations (Section IV, Section V.C). This assumption is common but load-bearing for predicting laser absorption and instability-related energy loss.
  • domain assumption Radiation transport has negligible effect on the erosion wave speed.
    The authors compared simulations with and without radiation and report small differences, but do not show the comparison (Section IV, paragraph on radiation). This choice reduces computational cost and directly affects the central speed prediction.
  • domain assumption Geometrical optics ray tracing in FLASH accurately captures the laser scattering and refraction in the micro-structure.
    The scattering mechanism is the central result and relies on the ray-tracing model in the FLASH code (Section IV). No validation of ray tracing against a higher-fidelity method is provided.
  • domain assumption The target structure is initialized as an exact, uniform log-pile with filament density 1.2 g/cm3 and the measured geometric parameters; manufacturing variations and the holder are ignored.
    The simulation reproduces the printed structure directly from design parameters (Section IV). Sample-to-sample variation and curling during annealing (Appendix A) could alter the actual structure.
  • domain assumption The experimental erosion wave front identified from the streak camera self-emission corresponds to the simulation's breakout time criterion (density along a line reaching a maximum).
    The comparison of speeds depends on this correspondence, which is uncertain given the blur at the self-emission front (Section V.A).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental and simulative study on laser irradiation of 3D-printed micro-structures at intensities relevant for inertial confinement fusion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WDQZXSPS

@misc{pith2026250604017,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental and simulative study on laser irradiation of 3D-printed micro-structures at intensities relevant for inertial confinement fusion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WDQZXSPS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04017}
}
read the original abstract

Inertial confinement fusion requires a constant search for the most effective materials for improving the efficiency of the compression of the capsule and of the laser-to-target energy transfer. Foams could provide a solution to these problems, but they require further experimental and theoretical investigation. The new 3D-printing technologies, such as the two-photon polymerization, are opening a new era in the production of foams, allowing for the fine control of the material morphology. Detailed studies of their interaction with high-power lasers in regimes relevant for inertial confinement fusion are very few in the literature so far and more investigation is needed. In this work we present the results an experimental campaign performed at the ABC laser facility in ENEA Centro Ricerche Frascati where 3D-printed micro-structured materials were irradiated at high power. 3D simulations of the laser-target interaction performed with the FLASH code reveal a strong scattering when the center of the focal spot is on the through hole of the structure. The time required for the laser to completely ablate the structure obtained by the simulations is in good agreement with the experimental measurement. The measure of the reflected and transmitted laser light indicates that the scattering occurred during the irradiation, in accordance with the simulations. Two-plasmon decay has also been found to be active during irradiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04017 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: An illustration of the techniques of production [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The experimental setup used in the campaign. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: The different cases of focusing. The light red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The time evolution of laser propagation inside the micro-structure. The columns show from left to right the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The density plots at different times, depending on the focusing point on the structure. The red dashed line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: A typical streaked image, obtained for the shot 6416. (a) The reference shot made with the only the probe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In both cases, the speed is generally closer to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The signals collected by Photodiode R for some [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The integrals of the signals from Photodiode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Some of the signals collected by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The holders for the structures were made by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    P \'e rez , author J

    author author F. P \'e rez , author J. R. \ Patterson , author M. May , author J. D. \ Colvin , author M. M. \ Biener , author A. Wittstock , author S. O. \ Kucheyev , author S. Charnvanichborikarn , author J. H. \ Satcher , author S. A. \ Gammon , author J. F. \ Poco , author S. Fujioka , author Z. Zhang , author K. Ishihara , author N. Tanaka , author T...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Benuzzi , author M

    author author A. Benuzzi , author M. Koenig , author J. Krishnan , author B. Faral , author W. Nazarov , author M. Temporal , author D. Batani , author L. M \"u ller , author F. Torsiello , author T. Hall , \ and\ author N. Grandjouan ,\ title title Dynamics of laser produced shocks in foam--solid targets , \ 10.1063/1.873031 journal journal Physics of Pl...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.873031

  8. [8]

    Batani , author A

    author author D. Batani , author A. Balducci , author W. Nazarov , author T. L \"o wer , author T. Hall , author M. Koening , author B. Faral , author A. Benuzzi , \ and\ author M. Temporal ,\ title title Use of low-density foams as pressure amplifiers in equation-of-state experiments with laser-driven shock waves , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.046410 journal jo...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.63.046410

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    u nther , author N. E. \ Andreev , author P. Tavana , author P. Neumayer , author S. Z \

    author author O. N. \ Rosmej , author M. Gyrdymov , author M. M. \ G \"u nther , author N. E. \ Andreev , author P. Tavana , author P. Neumayer , author S. Z \"a hter , author N. Zahn , author V. S. \ Popov , author N. G. \ Borisenko , author A. Kantsyrev , author A. Skobliako...

  2. [10]

    Cipriani , author S

    author author M. Cipriani , author S. Yu . \ Gus'kov , author F. Consoli , author R. De Angelis , author A. A. \ Rupasov , author P. Andreoli , author G. Cristofari , author G. Di Giorgio , \ and\ author M. Salvadori ,\ title title Time-dependent measurement of high-power lase...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Depierreux , author C

    author author S. Depierreux , author C. Labaune , author D. T. \ Michel , author C. Stenz , author P. Nicola \"i , author M. Grech , author G. Riazuelo , author S. Weber , author C. Riconda , author V. T. \ Tikhonchuk , author P. Loiseau , author N. G. \ Borisenko , author W. ...

  4. [12]

    De Angelis , author F

    author author R. De Angelis , author F. Consoli , author S. Yu . \ Gus'kov , author A. A. \ Rupasov , author P. Andreoli , author G. Cristofari , \ and\ author G. Di Giorgio ,\ title title Laser-ablated loading of solid target through foams of overcritical density , \ 10.1063/...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author D. A. \ Mariscal , author O. S. \ Jones , author R. L. \ Berger , author S. Patankar , author K. L. \ Baker , author T. F. \ Baumann , author M. M. \ Biener , author C. Goyon , author B. B. \ Pollock , author J. D. \ Moody , \ and\ author D. J. \ Strozzi ,\ title...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Hudec , author J

    author author L. Hudec , author J. Limpouch , author O. Renner , author V. T. \ Tikhonchuk , author R. Dudzak , author R. Liska , author Da . Blackman , author F. P. \ Condamine , author M. C erve n \'a k , author J. Dostal , author A. Gintrand , author O. Klimo , author M. Kr...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Iaquinta , author P

    author author S. Iaquinta , author P. Amendt , author J. Milovich , author E. Dewald , author L. Divol , author O. Jones , author L. Suter , author R. Wallace , author R. Bingham , author S. Glenzer , \ and\ author G. Gregori ,\ @noop title Characterization of foam-filled hohl...

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    author author A. S. \ Moore , author N. B. \ Meezan , author J. Milovich , author S. Johnson , author R. Heredia , author T. F. \ Baumann , author M. Biener , author S. D. \ Bhandarkar , author H. Chen , author L. Divol , author N. Izumi , author A. Nikroo , author K. Baker , ...

  9. [17]

    author author R. E. \ Olson , author M. J. \ Schmitt , author B. M. \ Haines , author G. E. \ Kemp , author C. B. \ Yeamans , author B. E. \ Blue , author D. W. \ Schmidt , author A. Haid , author M. Farrell , author P. A. \ Bradley , author H. F. \ Robey , \ and\ author R. J....

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author I. V. \ Igumenshchev , author W. Theobald , author C. Stoeckl , author R. C. \ Shah , author D. T. \ Bishel , author V. N. \ Goncharov , author M. J. \ Bonino , author E. M. \ Campbell , author L. Ceurvorst , author D. A. \ Chin , author T. J. B. \ Collins , auth...

  11. [19]

    Nagai , author C

    author author K. Nagai , author C. S. A. \ Musgrave , \ and\ author W. Nazarov ,\ title title A review of low density porous materials used in laser plasma experiments , \ 10.1063/1.5009689 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 25 ,\ pages 030501 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    Wang , author W

    author author H. Wang , author W. Zhang , author D. Ladika , author H. Yu , author D. Gailevi c ius , author H. Wang , author C.-F. \ Pan , author P.-N.-S. \ Nair , author Y. Ke , author T. Mori , author J.-Y.-E. \ Chan , author M. Farsari , author M. Malinauskas , author S. J...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Skliutas , author G

    author author E. Skliutas , author G. Merkininkait\. e , author S. Maruo , author W. Zhang , author W. Chen , author W. Deng , author J. Greer , author G. von Freymann , \ and\ author M. Malinauskas ,\ title title Multiphoton 3D Lithography , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Mat. ...

    2025

  14. [22]

    Wiste , author O

    author author T. Wiste , author O. Maliuk , author V. Tikhonchuk , author T. Lastovicka , author J. Homola , author K. Chadt , \ and\ author S. Weber ,\ title title Additive manufactured foam targets for experiments on high-power laser--matter interaction , \ 10.1063/5.0121650...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author O. S. \ Jones , author G. E. \ Kemp , author S. H. \ Langer , author B. J. \ Winjum , author R. L. \ Berger , author J. S. \ Oakdale , author M. A. \ Belyaev , author J. Biener , author M. M. \ Biener , author D. A. \ Mariscal , author J. L. \ Milovich , author M...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Meier , author R

    author author T. Meier , author R. Li , author S. Mavrikos , author B. Blankenship , author Z. Vangelatos , author M. E. \ Yildizdag , \ and\ author C. P. \ Grigoropoulos ,\ title title Obtaining auxetic and isotropic metamaterials in counterintuitive design spaces: an automat...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Hong ,\ title title Acousto-optic scanning multi-photon lithography with high printing rate , \ 10.29026/oea.2024.240003 journal journal Opto‐Electron

    author author M. Hong ,\ title title Acousto-optic scanning multi-photon lithography with high printing rate , \ 10.29026/oea.2024.240003 journal journal Opto‐Electron. Adv. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 240003 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  18. [26]

    Velechovsky , author J

    author author J. Velechovsky , author J. Limpouch , author R. Liska , \ and\ author V. Tikhonchuk ,\ title title Hydrodynamic modeling of laser interaction with micro-structured targets , \ 10.1088/0741-3335/58/9/095004 journal journal Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion \ vo...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Cipriani , author S.Yu

    author author M. Cipriani , author S.Yu . Gus'kov , author R. De Angelis , author F. Consoli , author A. Rupasov , author P. Andreoli , author G. Cristofari , author G. Di Giorgio , \ and\ author F. Ingenito ,\ title title Laser-supported hydrothermal wave in low-dense porous ...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author M. A. \ Belyaev , author R. L. \ Berger , author O. S. \ Jones , author S. H. \ Langer , author D. A. \ Mariscal , author J. Milovich , \ and\ author B. Winjum ,\ title title Laser propagation in a subcritical foam: Subgrid model , \ 10.1063/5.0022952 journal jou...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Hudec , author A

    author author L. Hudec , author A. Gintrand , author J. Limpouch , author R. Liska , author S. Shekhanov , author V. T. \ Tikhonchuk , \ and\ author S. Weber ,\ title title Hybrid ablation--expansion model for laser interaction with low-density foams , \ 10.1063/5.0139488 jour...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author J. L. \ Milovich , author O. S. \ Jones , author R. L. \ Berger , author G. E. \ Kemp , author J. S. \ Oakdale , author J. Biener , author M. A. \ Belyaev , author D. A. \ Mariscal , author S. Langer , author P. A. \ Sterne , author S. Sepke , \ and\ author M. St...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Iannone , author F

    author author F. Iannone , author F. Ambrosino , author G. Bracco , author M. De Rosa , author A. Funel , author G. Guarnieri , author S. Migliori , author F. Palombi , author G. Ponti , author G. Santomauro , \ and\ author P. Procacci ,\ title title Cresco enea hpc clusters: ...

    2019

  24. [32]

    Fryxell , author K

    author author B. Fryxell , author K. Olson , author P. Ricker , author F. X. \ Timmes , author M. Zingale , author D. Q. \ Lamb , author P. MacNeice , author R. Rosner , author J. W. \ Truran , \ and\ author H. Tufo ,\ title title FLASH : An Adaptive Mesh Hydrodynamics Code fo...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Dubey , author K

    author author A. Dubey , author K. Antypas , author M. K. \ Ganapathy , author L. B. \ Reid , author K. Riley , author D. Sheeler , author A. Siegel , \ and\ author K. Weide ,\ title title Extensible component-based architecture for FLASH , a massively parallel, multiphysics s...

    doi

  26. [34]

    @noop title TOPS Opacities , \ howpublished https://aphysics2.lanl.gov/apps/ NoStop

  27. [35]

    Cipriani , author S

    author author M. Cipriani , author S. Yu . \ Gus'kov , author R. De Angelis , author F. Consoli , author A. A. \ Rupasov , author P. Andreoli , author G. Cristofari , \ and\ author G. Di Giorgio ,\ title title Laser-driven hydrothermal wave speed in low- Z foam of overcritical...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Limpouch , author V

    author author J. Limpouch , author V. Tikhonchuk , author O. Renner , author Sh . Agarwal , author T. Burian , author J. C ervenka , author J. Dost \'a l , author R. Dud z \'a k , author D. Ettel , author A. Gintrand , author L. Hudec , author L. Juha , author O. Klimo , autho...

  29. [37]

    Ladika , author A

    author author D. Ladika , author A. Butkus , author V. Melissinaki , author E. Skliutas , author E. Kabouraki , author S. Juodkazis , author M. Farsari , \ and\ author M. Malinauskas ,\ title title X-photon 3D lithography by fs-oscillators: wavelength-independent and photoinit...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.